TW202233464A - Driving evaluation device, driving evaluation program and report data providing a driving evaluation device, driving evaluation program and report data that can make a fairer evaluation among multiple drivers even when the operating condition of the vehicle changes - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention is to provide a driving evaluation device, driving evaluation program and report data that can make a fairer evaluation among multiple drivers even when the operating condition of the vehicle changes. The solution of the invention is: in S15 and S16, each driver compares the delivery route of the current day operation performance with the current day scheduled delivery route or the delivery route in the past operation performance, detects whether the operation is under a special condition such as operating in an unfamiliar delivery route, and gives an exclusion mark to the daily report of the corresponding day. The evaluation value of each driver is calculated based on the remaining data after excluding the actual performance data of the special conditions. In addition to the delivery routes, the types of roads and the information of the running vehicles are also taken into consideration and the exclusion mark is given. In S19, we produce a monthly report that summarizes the daily reports excluding the exclusion mark, and the monthly evaluation value is calculated based on the monthly report.

Description

Driving evaluation device, driving evaluation program and reporting data

The present invention relates to a driving evaluation device, a driving evaluation program, and reporting data.

For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a driving diagnosis system that more accurately diagnoses the quality of the driver's driving. Specifically, the vehicle-mounted terminal obtains and records vehicle information and diagnostic information, and transmits the recorded vehicle information and diagnostic information to the server device. Based on the vehicle information and the diagnosis information, the server device performs driving diagnosis processing by excluding the vehicle information detected when the vehicle defect is detected.

In addition, Patent Document 2 discloses an operation management system capable of preventing interference between vehicles even when the update frequency of data is low. Specifically, the in-vehicle device determines whether its own vehicle or other vehicles are in a special state. When it is determined that its own vehicle is in a special state, it transmits the fact that its own vehicle is in a special state to the center or other vehicles. When it is determined that the predetermined other vehicle is in a special state When the other vehicle is in a special state, it is transmitted to the center or other vehicles that are different from the predetermined other vehicles. When the interference risk between one's own vehicle and other vehicles is judged and it is judged that there is a risk of interference, it will generate a response to the operation. warning information for the user and output. A special state refers to a state where communication cannot be performed, or a state that is assumed to be transferred to a state where communication cannot be performed. [Prior Art Literature] [Patent Literature]

[Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2012-146195. [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2018-49542.

[The problem to be solved by the invention]

In general, companies such as transportation companies that routinely operate business vehicles such as trucks use a large number of vehicle operators employed within the company to repeatedly operate various vehicles. In addition, in order to ensure the safety of vehicle operation work, the managers of each company conduct labor management for each vehicle operator who operates the vehicle, and evaluate whether each vehicle operator actually drives safely.

For example, if a company installs an in-vehicle device such as a digital tachograph on its vehicle, it can obtain the actual performance data that records the driving state of the vehicle staff during the operation. Analysis is performed to evaluate whether the corresponding vehicle operator is driving safely. As a specific example, imagine that the company evaluates the number and frequency of rapid acceleration and deceleration, and the number and frequency of exceeding the speed limit, and manages the results to quantify, so as to grasp whether each vehicle operator is driving safely.

In addition, when an in-company manager or the like evaluates driving characteristics such as safe driving separately for a large number of vehicle operators, it is important to make a fair evaluation for all the vehicle operators. However, it is difficult to make a fair assessment. For example, when the accidental occurrence of the vehicle for some reason during the operation is recorded as the actual performance data, although the corresponding vehicle operator performs normal driving operations, the evaluation is still likely to be lowered, and the evaluation will be lowered by other vehicle operators. It is not ideal from the point of view of fairness between the two.

Specifically, a skilled vehicle operator who routinely repeats the operation of delivering goods to the same delivery destination is likely to have a high evaluation. However, even such a vehicle operator may still be instructed to perform ad hoc operations to deliver goods to a new delivery destination. When carrying out this special operation, it is very likely that the vehicle operator will increase the number of times of acceleration and deceleration and the number of times of reversing the vehicle compared to usual because of driving on an unfamiliar road. Furthermore, when evaluating the actual performance data recorded during the operation at this time, it is expected that the evaluation will decrease even if the driving skill of the corresponding vehicle operator does not deteriorate. That is to say, an instruction to change the content of the operation work results in a decrease in the evaluation of the operator who has received the instruction, resulting in unfair evaluation among a plurality of operators.

The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to provide a driving evaluation device, a driving evaluation program, and report data that can perform fair evaluation among a plurality of vehicle operators even when the operating state of the vehicle changes. [means to solve the problem]

In order to achieve the aforementioned objects, the driving evaluation device, the driving evaluation program, and the report data of the present invention are characterized by the following (1) to (6). (1) A driving evaluation device for evaluating the operation status of each operator based on the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each operator in the running vehicle, wherein the driving evaluation device includes: a route acquisition The identification part is used to obtain the first running route information and the second running route information for the vehicle operator as the evaluation object; the identification code assigning part is to compare the aforementioned first running route information and the aforementioned second running route information, and when the comparison result is consistent with When a predetermined condition is used, an identification code for excluding the corresponding specific operation log data from the evaluation object is assigned to the above-mentioned specific operation log data; and the evaluation value calculation part is extracted from the above-mentioned operation log data according to the above-mentioned identification code. The evaluation object data related to the second running route information, and the extracted evaluation object data are evaluated according to each vehicle operator, and the aggregated evaluation value is output.

(2) The driving evaluation device according to (1) above, wherein the identification code assigning unit reflects at least one of the vehicle information and road type included in the operation log data as a condition for assigning the identification code .

(3) The driving evaluation device according to the above (1) or (2), wherein the route acquisition unit acquires the first operation route information from the first operation log data as a candidate for processing, and obtains the first operation route information from the first operation record as the processing target candidate. The above-mentioned second operation route information is obtained from the second operation record data recorded in the past performance before the first operation record data or the delivery schedule of the current day.

(4) The driving evaluation device according to any one of the above (1) to (3), wherein the evaluation value calculation unit generates short-term actual performance data and a ratio indicating the actual performance for a predetermined period from the operation record data, respectively. The aforementioned short-term performance data is also the long-term performance data of long-term performance, and when generating or evaluating the aforementioned long-term performance data, the aforementioned operation record data with the aforementioned identification symbols are excluded and aggregated.

(5) A driving evaluation program, which can be executed by a computer, and is used to evaluate the operation status of each vehicle operator based on the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each vehicle operator running the vehicle, the aforementioned driving evaluation program. The system includes the following procedures: obtaining first running route information and second running route information for the vehicle operator as the evaluation object; When , assigning an identification symbol for excluding the corresponding specific operation record data from the evaluation object; and extracting the evaluation object data related to the second operation path information from the operation record data according to the identification symbol, and analyzing the extracted data. The aforementioned evaluation object data is evaluated according to each vehicle operator, and the aggregated evaluation value is output.

(6) Report data generated based on the driving evaluation device described in (1) above.

According to the driving evaluation device of the configuration of the above (1) and the report data of the configuration of the above (6), when the special operation work corresponding to the first operation route information may unduly lower the evaluation of the corresponding vehicle operator, it is possible to The operation record data recorded in the special operation business is excluded from the evaluation object. Therefore, the evaluation value calculation unit can perform the evaluation in such a manner that unfair evaluation does not occur among a plurality of vehicle operators because the evaluation is performed only based on the evaluation target data extracted from the identification code. For example, unfair evaluation can be reduced by excluding the operation log data recorded by the vehicle operator who is the evaluation object when he performed the operation work on an unfamiliar route.

According to the driving evaluation device of the above-mentioned (2) configuration, the operation log data recorded during the special operation work which is different from the daily operation work for the vehicle operator as the evaluation object can be excluded from the evaluation object. For example, differences in vehicle types such as large/medium-sized cars/small cars, and differences in road types such as general roads/highways are likely to have a great impact on the content of the recorded operation record data, and these differences may affect vehicle types. The undue influence of staff evaluations will be avoided.

According to the driving evaluation device of the configuration (3) above, since the second operation record data recorded as the past actual performance reflects the content of the operation work performed by the corresponding vehicle operator on a daily basis, the second operation record data is obtained by using this second operation record. The running route of the data is set as a reference, and it is possible to easily identify whether or not the first log data is suitable as a candidate for processing.

The driving evaluation device according to the configuration of the above (4) can easily distinguish and grasp the actual performance in a relatively short period such as daily time data and in a relatively long period such as monthly data, for example. In addition, when generating or evaluating long-term performance data, since the operation record data to which the identification code is assigned are excluded and aggregated, it is easy to grasp the actual performance of each vehicle operator only related to the daily operation work, which can reduce the number of Possibility of unfair evaluation among vehicle crews.

According to the driving evaluation program of the above (5), when the special operation work corresponding to the first operation route information may lower the evaluation of the corresponding vehicle staff, the special operation work can be excluded from the evaluation object. operation log data. Therefore, the evaluation value calculation unit can perform the evaluation in such a manner that unfair evaluation does not occur among a plurality of vehicle operators because the evaluation is performed only by the evaluation target data extracted from the identification code. For example, it is possible to reduce unfair evaluation by excluding the operation record data recorded by the vehicle operator who is the target of the evaluation when they perform operation work on an unfamiliar route. [Inventive effect]

According to the driving evaluation device, the driving evaluation program, and the report data of the present invention, even when the operating state of the vehicle changes, it is possible to suppress unfair evaluation among a plurality of vehicle operators. That is to say, when the special operation operation corresponding to the first operation information may inappropriately lower the evaluation of the corresponding train personnel, the operation record data recorded during the special operation operation can be excluded from the evaluation object. .

The present invention has been briefly described above. In addition, the details of the present invention should be further clarified by reading the modes for carrying out the invention (hereinafter referred to as "embodiments") described below with reference to the drawings in the appendix.

Hereinafter, specific embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

[System Components] FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a system including a driving evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The system shown in FIG. 1 is used, for example, in a company such as a transportation company, and is used to manage the operation status of a large number of operators who drive business vehicles such as transportation trucks and deliver goods. In such an enterprise, each vehicle operator usually operates the vehicle through one of the predetermined one or more delivery routes in order to deliver the goods to one or more predetermined delivery destinations.

Furthermore, for example, due to an emergency situation, the goods may be delivered to a new delivery destination other than a predetermined delivery destination, and thus the vehicle may be operated using a new delivery route different from the usual one. In addition, depending on the situation, it is also possible to use the delivery route so that the expressway and the general road are used separately to carry out the operation of the vehicle. Further, for example, according to the difference in the size and quantity of the cargo, it is also possible to use separate vehicles of different types such as small cars, medium cars, and large cars for operation.

The server system 10 shown in FIG. 1 has a function corresponding to a driving evaluation device. That is to say, the server system 10 can grasp the data of the respective driving conditions of various vehicle operators who operate vehicles such as trucks in the form of daily reports or monthly reports, and can automatically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of whether each vehicle operator is driving safely. and display the result. In addition, the server system 10 may be installed in each enterprise that manages vehicles and vehicle personnel, or may be installed in a predetermined data center.

Each of the in-vehicle devices 20 is installed in all vehicles that are likely to be driven by a large number of vehicle operators to be managed. As a representative example of the in-vehicle device 20, a tachograph such as a digital tachograph is assumed. In addition, the in-vehicle device 20 is equipped with a wireless communication module, so that the data recorded during the operation of the vehicle can be transmitted to the outside.

As a representative example of the data collected by the in-vehicle device 20 during the operation of the vehicle, it is assumed that the operator ID (identification), the time of leaving the warehouse, the time of entering the warehouse, the running time, the running distance, the maximum speed, the number of overspeeds, the number of overspeeds, and the speed Acceleration times, rapid deceleration times, idling timeout time, driving history, etc.

As shown in FIG. 1 , the server system 10 and the in-vehicle device 20 installed in each vehicle can be wirelessly connected via a wireless communication device 30 . For example, when the wireless communication device 30 performs narrow-area wireless communication, wireless connection and data communication are performed in a state where each vehicle is parked at a predetermined location when each vehicle leaves the warehouse and when it enters the warehouse. In addition, when the wireless communication device 30 performs wide-area wireless communication, a wireless connection is established at any time when each vehicle is running, and data communication is performed as required.

The server system 10 includes various functions of a data receiving unit 11 , a data processing unit 12 , a driving evaluation unit 13 , a display processing unit 14 , an actual operation performance DB (database; the same applies hereinafter) 15 , and a driving evaluation DB 16 . These various functions are realized by executing the application software including the driving evaluation program prepared in advance by the computer constituting the core of the server system 10 .

The data receiving unit 11 receives and acquires the telegram data transmitted from the in-vehicle device 20 installed in each vehicle via the wireless communication device 30, and stores it in a predetermined internal storage device. The telegram data transmitted by the in-vehicle device 20 may be, for example, the day-to-day operation performance data that is uniformly transmitted when the vehicle completes the delivery of the day and is stored in the warehouse, or may be individual data transmitted sequentially or periodically at any time during the operation of the vehicle. operating performance data. In either case, the telegram data transmitted by the in-vehicle device 20 includes information indicating the crew ID of the specific crew member driving the corresponding vehicle. Therefore, the data receiving unit 11 can manage the received various data in association with the driver of the vehicle.

In the actual operation performance DB 15 , the daily operation performance data of each vehicle operator received by the data receiving unit 11 is inputted via the data processing unit 12 , and stored and stored.

The data processing unit 12 recognizes whether or not there is "operation under special conditions" that should be excluded from the evaluation target of the vehicle operator based on the data received by the data receiving unit 11 . Then, when the data processing unit 12 detects an operation under a special situation, it gives an exclusion flag to the corresponding operation record data on the operation record DB 15 . "Operation under special conditions" refers to situations such as the running route of the vehicle that is different from the usual situation, etc., and is handled according to the identification of each vehicle operator under different conditions, which will be explained in detail later.

The driving evaluation unit 13 evaluates the driving of each operator by using the daily operation performance data on the operation performance DB 15 , the monthly operation performance data obtained by summarizing the operation performance data, and the like. The results of the evaluation are stored in the driving evaluation DB 16 and managed. In addition, the driving evaluation unit 13 implements the driving evaluation in which the bonus point system is introduced, which will be described in detail later.

The display processing unit 14 outputs a list as a monthly report and displays it on a predetermined display screen in order of the highest monthly improvement rate of the evaluation points for the plurality of vehicle operators based on the evaluation results on the driving evaluation DB 16 .

[Procedures for data processing] FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of data processing in the driving evaluation apparatus. The computer of the server system 10 shown in FIG. 1 realizes the function of the data processing unit 12 by executing the data processing program shown in FIG. 2 .

The data processing unit 12 can access the delivery schedule DB 41 , the current-day operation results DB 42 , the past operation results DB 43 , the daily report DB 44 , and the monthly report DB 45 shown in FIG. 2 . The delivery schedule DB 41 manages data indicating the daily delivery schedule of each vehicle operator determined in advance. The data includes the planned delivery route, the type of vehicles running (for large vehicles, medium-sized vehicles, small cars, etc.), and the type of road (for expressways, general roads, etc.) in each section of the planned delivery route.

The current day's actual operation performance DB 42 acquires the current day's operation performance data determined when the vehicle is put into storage from the data receiving unit 11 , and stores and manages it for each vehicle operator. The actual operation performance data includes the delivery routes traveled in actual operation, the types of vehicles in operation (large vehicles, medium-sized vehicles, small vehicles, etc.), and the types of roads (expressways, general roads, etc.) in each section of the delivery route. distinguish).

The past operation performance DB 43 stores and manages the past operation performance data, which is the daily-counted data for each vehicle operator, which indicates the past operation performance before the current day. This data, like the actual operation performance data of the current day, includes the delivery route traveled during the actual operation, the type of vehicle (large, medium, small, etc.) in operation, and the type of road in each section of the delivery route ( Expressways, general roads, etc.).

Daily report DB44 stores and manages the daily report data in the form of a report suitable for the managers of the company to grasp the daily operation status and evaluation of each vehicle operator. Monthly report DB45 will store and manage the data in the form of reports, that is, monthly reports, which are suitable for the managers of the enterprise to grasp the monthly operation status and evaluation of each vehicle operator.

The data processing unit 12 first acquires the actual operation performance data of the current day for each operator from the current operation performance DB 42 ( S11 ). Moreover, the operation condition D1 is acquired from the actual operation performance data of that day (S12). The operating condition D1 indicates the delivery route that is actually traveling, the type of vehicle that is traveling, the type of road in each section of the delivery route, and the like.

Next, the data processing unit 12 refers to the delivery schedule DB 41, and acquires the operating condition D2 from the delivery schedule of the corresponding driver on the day (S13). The operation condition D2 indicates the planned delivery route, the type of vehicle to be operated, the type of road in each section of the delivery route, and the like.

Next, the data processing unit 12 obtains the operation condition D3 by referring to the past operation record of the corresponding vehicle operator from the past operation record DB 43 ( S14 ). The operating condition D3 indicates the delivery route traveled in the past actual driving, the type of the vehicle that was driven, the type of road in each section of the delivery route, and the like.

The data processing unit 12 compares whether or not the arterial road on the route of the actual operating condition D1 matches the scheduled delivery operating condition D2 (S15), and proceeds to S18 when they match, and proceeds to S16 when they do not.

Further, the data processing unit 12 compares whether or not the arterial road located on the route of the actual performance operating condition D1 exists in the operating condition D3 indicating the past actual performance (S16), and proceeds to S17 when not present, and proceeds to S18 when present.

That is to say, when the trunk road in the route actually operated by the corresponding vehicle operator on the current day is different from the delivery schedule and is different from the past routinely operated route, the data processing unit 12 proceeds to S17. Then, in S17, the data processing unit 12 assigns an exclusion flag to the daily daily report of the corresponding vehicle operator.

For example, the operation was carried out on the current day, and the operation was based on a sudden schedule change instruction issued by the management department to the vehicle operator, the change was not reflected in the delivery schedule of the delivery schedule DB 41, and there was no operating experience in delivering the goods to that date. the new delivery destination, the data processing unit 12 executes S17 at this time. In this case, even a skilled vehicle operator is not familiar with driving on the route, which is different from normal vehicle operation, so it is generally assumed that the number of abrupt acceleration and deceleration increases and the number of reverse driving increases. Such a driving operation is a factor that lowers the evaluation of the corresponding driver, and thus may give an unfair evaluation compared to other drivers who perform daily deliveries limited to the same route. Here, when an operation under a special situation such as a route change is detected, an exclusion flag is given to the corresponding daily report, and the actual performance data is excluded from the evaluation target of the corresponding vehicle operator.

The data processing unit 12 creates daily data for each driver as report data based on the actual operation performance of each driver on the day, and stores the data in the daily report DB 44 ( S18 ). The exclusion flag given in S17 is attached to the report on the day to be excluded from the evaluation target of the vehicle operator.

In addition, the data processing unit 12 compiles the daily reports of each driver on a monthly basis and only those without exclusion signs, creates the monthly report data for each driver as report data, and stores the data in the monthly report DB 45 ( S19 ).

[Variation of data processing] FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a modified example of data processing in the driving evaluation device. The data processing in FIG. 3 is a modification of the data processing in FIG. 2 , and the difference is only that steps S21 and S22 are added.

In the data processing of FIG. 3 , when the route of the operating condition D1 in the current operating results is the daily route, the data processing unit 12 proceeds from step S15 or S16 to the processing of S21. Then, regarding the type of the running vehicle, in S21, the running condition D1 of the actual running performance of the current day is compared with the running condition D2 of the delivery schedule.

When the types of the running vehicles match, the data processing unit 12 proceeds from S21 to the processing of S18. In addition, if they do not match, the data processing unit 12 proceeds to S22, refers to the operation condition D3 of the past operation performance, and recognizes whether or not there is an operation record of the same type of vehicle as the operation vehicle of the operation condition D1. When there is an actual operation record of the same type of vehicle, the process proceeds from S22 to S18, and when there is no vehicle, the process proceeds to S17.

For example, if a driver who usually only operates small or medium-sized vehicles runs a large vehicle on the same day and carries out delivery, even if the delivery is carried out on a familiar route, since they are not familiar with the size of the vehicle, it is likely that the evaluation will be lowered. drive. Therefore, the data processing unit 12 regards such an actual operation performance as an operation under a special situation, and gives an exclusion flag to the corresponding daily report in S17. Thereby, the driving evaluation device can perform a fairer evaluation among a plurality of vehicle operators.

[Procedure of driving evaluation processing] FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of driving evaluation processing in the driving evaluation device. The computer of the server system 10 shown in FIG. 1 realizes the function of the driving evaluation unit 13 by executing the program of the driving evaluation processing in FIG. 4 .

For example, the driving evaluation unit 13 executes the driving evaluation process of FIG. 4 for the operation performance data in the daily report on the daily report DB 44 shown in FIG. 2 and the operation performance data in the monthly report on the monthly report DB 45 as objects, and can automatically The evaluation value of the train operator is calculated as a value in units of one day or a unit of one month. However, the driving evaluation unit 13 excludes the actual driving performance data with the exclusion flag from the evaluation target because the actual operation performance at the time of driving under special conditions is given the exclusion flag. The driving evaluation process of FIG. 4 will be described below.

The driving evaluation unit 13 acquires information on the type (vehicle type) of the vehicle actually operated from the operation performance data of the daily report as the evaluation object, identifies the information in S31, and determines various parameters required for evaluating the vehicle operator, so as to obtain the information. Suitable for each vehicle type (S31a, S31b, S31c).

In S32, the driving evaluation unit 13 recognizes the information of the actual operation route and the type of the road in the main road on the route based on the operation performance data of the daily report which is the object of evaluation, and determines various parameters required for evaluating the vehicle operator. , to suit each road type (S32a, S32b).

The driving evaluation unit 13 sequentially selects various evaluation items, and acquires parameters necessary for evaluating the selected evaluation items, respectively (S33, S33a to S33e). For example, parameters such as threshold value and weight are appropriately determined for each evaluation item of "maximum speed", "number of overspeed", "number of overspeed", "number of rapid acceleration and deceleration", and "idle overtime time".

In S34, the driving evaluation unit 13 calculates the evaluation points of the corresponding vehicle operator based on the acquired various parameters and the operation performance data in the daily report for each of the selected evaluation items. The number of points calculated here is set to be in the range of 0 to 100. In addition, the driving evaluation unit 13 calculates the points of the comprehensive evaluation by summarizing all the evaluation items. In addition, the driving evaluation unit 13 calculates the score of the comprehensive evaluation in the monthly report by summarizing the comprehensive evaluation for the daily report.

In addition, regarding the scores of the comprehensive evaluation, for example, A to J scores are implemented as follows. "Level: Range of Scores" "A: 90 to 100", "B: 80 to 90", "C: 70 to 80", "D: 60 to 70", "E: 50 to 60", "F: 40 to 50", "G : 30 to 40", "H: 20 to 30", "I: 10 to 20", "J: 0 to 10".

In S35 and S36, the driving evaluation unit 13 compares the scores of the comprehensive evaluations in the monthly reports for each of the several months for each operator. In addition, when the condition of "the score of the previous month and the previous month is less than 60 points consecutively" is met, and the condition of "the score of this month has increased by more than two levels compared with the previous month", the process proceeds to the next S37 . In this case, the driving evaluation unit 13 gives a comment indicating that the driving skill has been improved, further updates the comprehensive evaluation for this month, and adds 30% as a bonus point ( S37 ).

For example, when the comprehensive evaluation of a specific vehicle operator in July, August, and September (this month) is 50, 55, and 75, respectively, since both conditions of S35 and S36 are met at the same time, the 9th The monthly 75 points will add 30%, and the final comprehensive evaluation will be 97.5 points. In addition, when the driving evaluation unit 13 recognizes that the updated score exceeds the maximum full score (100) in S38, the score is corrected to the full score in S39.

[The composition of the monthly statement list] FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the monthly report list table 50 . The monthly report list table 50 shown in FIG. 5 shows a specific example of the data list required by the display processing unit 14 of FIG. 1 to display the improvement rate of the monthly evaluation points in a ranking format for a large number of vehicle operators. That is, the display processing unit 14 can generate and display the contents of the monthly report list table 50 as shown in FIG. 5 by collecting monthly reports for a large number of vehicle operators.

The monthly report list table 50 of FIG. 5 is configured in a state in which the data of many items 50a to 50o are arranged in the row direction in the order of high to low. Items 50a to 50o respectively indicate the ranking, the name of the vehicle operator, the comprehensive evaluation, the grade, the improvement rate (%), the daily report, the running time (hour, minute, second), the running distance (km), and the maximum speed (km/ h), the number of overspeeds, the number of overspeeds, the number of rapid accelerations, the number of rapid decelerations, the idling timeout time (hours, minutes, seconds) and the national ranking.

In addition, the daily report link 52 for accessing the daily report list table 70 is provided in the daily report item 50f. In addition, when one or more exclusion flags 71 are included in the corresponding daily report list table 70, the exclusion flag 51 is displayed in the item 50f of the daily report.

In the example of FIG. 5 , the overall evaluation item 50c of the first-ranked driver "driver A" is 83 points, and the improvement rate item 50e is 18.5%. In addition, the overall evaluation item 50c of the second-ranked vehicle operator "driver B" was 85 points, and the improvement rate item 50e was 10.5%. Therefore, the train staff "Driver A" with a higher improvement rate is ranked higher than the train staff "Driver B".

The display processing unit 14 can accept an input operation by, for example, an administrator's mouse operation, in a state in which the monthly report list table 50 of FIG. 5 is displayed. For example, when the manager selects the part of the driver's name "driver A" in the item 50b, the display processing unit 14 can display the monthly list table 60 as shown in FIG. 6 .

[The composition of the monthly list table] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the monthly list table 60 . The monthly list table 60 is configured to rank the contents of the monthly reports for a plurality of months with respect to the particular selected vehicle operator in a manner that can be easily compared. Therefore, the manager can compare the actual performance of the current month with the actual performance of the past month for the corresponding vehicle operator.

The monthly list table 60 of FIG. 6 includes a number of items 60a, 60b, 60c, 60d . . . FIG. 6 shows only a part of the monthly list table 60. In fact, the items 50j to 50n in the monthly report list table 50 after the item 60d actually have the number of overspeeds, the number of overspeeds, the number of rapid accelerations, the number of rapid decelerations, and the idling. Each item of the timeout period.

In the month-by-month list table 60 in FIG. 6, item 60a includes date (year/month), item 60b includes comprehensive evaluation scores, grades, and improvement rates, and item 60c includes top-speed actual performance, evaluation scores, improvement rates, and comments .

In the example of FIG. 6, in the column "2020/8" of the item 60a of the date, since the improvement rate (36.4%) in the item 60c of the highest speed is large, the score "22.5 points" is added to the evaluation point. ”, and further automatically write a sentence that is easy to understand the situation into the comment column.

[The composition of the daily list sheet] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the daily report list table 70 . In the state where the monthly report list table 50 of FIG. 5 is displayed, when the manager's input operation selects the daily report link 52 ranked second, the display processing unit 14 displays the daily report list table 70 as shown in FIG. 7 .

In the daily report list table 70 of FIG. 5 , the content lists of daily reports of a plurality of dates are arranged in order along the column direction. Each item 70a to 70n of the daily list table 70 respectively indicates the name of the vehicle operator, the time of leaving the warehouse, the time of entering the warehouse, the running time, the running distance, the comprehensive evaluation, the level, the maximum speed, the number of overspeed, the number of overspeed, the number of rapid acceleration, the number of rapid acceleration The number of decelerations, the idling timeout time and the driving history, etc.

In addition, an exclusion flag 71 is displayed in the item 70n of the travel history in the daily report on the date of the operation under the special situation that should be excluded from the evaluation. The display processing unit 14 can accept an input operation from a manager in a state where the daily report list table 70 of FIG. 5 is displayed. Then, when, for example, the item 70n of the travel history is selected by an input operation, the display processing unit 14 displays the details of the travel history.

[Advantages of driving evaluation devices] In the above-mentioned driving evaluation device, as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 , operation under special conditions is detected by data processing, and an exclusion flag is given to the actual operation performance, so that it is easy to perform a fair operation evaluation among a plurality of vehicle operators. . That is, it is possible to perform a fair operation evaluation that takes into account the experience of each operator with respect to the individual operation route. Furthermore, by considering the difference in the type of vehicle or the type of road being operated, a fairer evaluation can be performed.

In addition, when calculating the monthly evaluation score, since it can be calculated based on the data of the monthly report excluding the daily report with the exclusion flag, the manager can easily grasp the fair evaluation value of each vehicle operator.

In addition, the driving evaluation device can automatically give bonus points to the train personnel with a large improvement rate of the evaluation points by the processing shown in FIG. 4 . As a result, it is expected that each driver will improve their awareness, thereby encouraging autonomous improvement of driving skills. In particular, for items that are rated low due to the influence of each driver's personal driving habits, based on the evaluation, a reward score will be given on the condition that there is a greater improvement, and it can be expected to improve the awareness of each driver. And autonomously correct driving habits.

Furthermore, by listing the evaluations of each driver in a ranking format like the monthly report list table 50 in FIG. 5 , the manager can easily grasp the improvement status of the driving skills of the plurality of drivers. In addition, by displaying the contents of the monthly list table 60 as shown in FIG. 6 in a list, the manager can easily grasp the improvement status of driving skills for each operator. In addition, by attaching a mark to the daily exclusion flag 71 for daily operation under special conditions and displaying it like the daily report list table 70 in FIG.

Here, the features of the driving evaluation device, the driving evaluation program, and the report data according to the above-described embodiments of the present invention are summarized and listed in the following [1] to [6], respectively. [1] A driving evaluation device (server system 10 ), which is used to evaluate the operation status of each vehicle operator based on the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each vehicle operator who runs the vehicle. The aforementioned driving evaluation The device includes a route acquisition unit (data processing unit 12, S11 to S14) that acquires first travel route information (operating condition D1) and second travel route information (operating condition D2, D3); the identification code assigning part (data processing part 12, S15 to S17), which compares the aforementioned first running route information with the aforementioned second running route information, and when the comparison result meets the predetermined condition, it will be used to extract information from the evaluation object. The identification code excluding the corresponding specific operation record data is assigned to the above-mentioned specific operation record data; and the evaluation value calculation part (driving evaluation part 13 ) is based on the above-mentioned identification code from the above-mentioned operation record data. Information-related evaluation object data, and evaluate the above-mentioned evaluation object data extracted according to each vehicle operator, and output the aggregated evaluation value.

[2] The driving evaluation device according to the above [1], wherein the identification code assigning section reflects at least one of the vehicle information and road type included in the operation log data as a condition for assigning the identification code (S15, S16, S21, S22).

[3] The driving evaluation device according to the above [1] or [2], wherein the route acquisition unit acquires the first operation route information (operation condition D1 ) from the first operation log data which is a candidate for processing, The second operation route information is obtained from the second operation record data (operation condition D3) recorded as the past performance before the first operation record data or the delivery schedule (operation condition D2) of the current day.

[4] The driving evaluation device according to any one of the above [1] to [3], wherein the evaluation value calculation unit generates short-term performance data (daily report) representing the performance for a predetermined period from the operation record data, respectively. DB44) and long-term performance data (monthly report DB45) indicating the performance for a period longer than the short-term performance data, and when generating or evaluating the long-term performance data, the operation record data assigned the identification symbol are excluded and aggregated ( S19).

[5] A driving evaluation program, which can be executed by a computer, is used to evaluate the operation status of each vehicle operator based on the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each vehicle operator running the vehicle. The aforementioned driving evaluation program It includes the following procedures: the steps of obtaining first and second running route information for the vehicle operator as the evaluation object (S11 to S14); comparing the aforementioned first running route information with the aforementioned second running route information, When the comparison result satisfies the predetermined condition, assign an identification symbol for excluding the corresponding specific operation log data from the evaluation object (S15 to S17); The evaluation object data related to the route information is evaluated, and the extracted evaluation object data is evaluated for each vehicle operator, and the aggregated evaluation value is output (S31 to S34).

[6] Report data generated based on the driving evaluation device described in the above [1].

10: Server system (driving evaluation device) 11: Data Receiving Department 12: Data Processing Department (Route Acquisition Department) 13: Driving Evaluation Section (Evaluation Value Calculation Section) 14: Display processing section 15: Run the actual performance DB 16: Driving Evaluation DB 20: Vehicle device 30: Wireless communication equipment 41: Delivery Schedule DB 42: Today's operation performance DB 43: Past operation performance DB 44: Daily DB (short-term performance data) 45: Monthly report DB (long-term performance data) 50: monthly report list 50a~50o: Item 51: Exclusion sign (identifier) 52: Daily Links 60: Monthly list 60a~60d: Items 70: Daily Checklist 70a~70n: Items 71: Exclusion sign (identifier) S11~S19, S21~S22, S31, S31a~S31c, S32, S32a~S32b, S33, S33a~S33e, S34~S39: Steps

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a system including a driving evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of data processing in the driving evaluation device. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a modified example of data processing in the driving evaluation device. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of driving evaluation processing in the driving evaluation device. [ Fig. 5 ] is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the monthly report list table. Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the monthly list table. Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of the daily report list table.

41: Delivery Schedule DB

42: Today's operation performance DB

43: Past operation performance DB

44: Daily DB

45: Monthly DB

S11~S19: Steps

Claims (7)

A driving evaluation device is used to evaluate the operation status of each vehicle operator according to the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each vehicle operator who runs the vehicle. The aforementioned driving evaluation device is provided with: The route obtaining unit obtains the first travel route information and the second travel route information for the vehicle operator who is the evaluation object; The identification code assigning part compares the first operation path information with the second operation path information, and when the comparison result meets the predetermined condition, assigns the identification code used to exclude the corresponding specific operation record data from the evaluation object to the identification code. the aforementioned specific operational log data; and The evaluation value calculation unit extracts the evaluation object data related to the second operation route information from the operation record data according to the identification symbol, and evaluates the extracted evaluation object data according to each vehicle operator, and outputs the output The aggregated evaluation value. The driving evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein the identification code assigning unit reflects at least one of the vehicle information and road type included in the operation record data as a condition for assigning the identification code. The driving evaluation device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the route obtaining unit obtains the first operation route information from the first operation log data as the candidate for processing, and obtains the first operation path information from the first operation log data before the first operation record data. The second operation route information is obtained from the second operation log data recorded in the past performance or the delivery schedule of the current day. The driving evaluation device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the evaluation value calculation unit generates short-term performance data representing actual performance for a predetermined period and performance representing a period longer than the short-term performance data from the operation record data, respectively. The long-term performance data, and when generating or evaluating the above-mentioned long-term performance data, the above-mentioned operation record data assigned the above-mentioned identification symbols will be excluded and aggregated. The driving evaluation device according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation value calculation unit generates, from the operation record data, short-term performance data representing actual performance for a predetermined period and short-term performance data representing performance for a period longer than the short-term performance data, respectively. Long-term performance data, and when generating or evaluating the above-mentioned long-term performance data, the above-mentioned operation record data with the above-mentioned identification symbols will be excluded and aggregated. A driving evaluation program, which can be executed by a computer, is used to evaluate the operation status of each vehicle operator according to the operation record data obtained by detecting the operation status of each vehicle operator running the vehicle. The aforementioned driving evaluation program includes the following: described procedure: Obtain the first running route information and the second running route information for the vehicle operator as the evaluation object; Comparing the first operation path information with the second operation path information, when the comparison result meets a predetermined condition, assigning an identification symbol for excluding the corresponding specific operation record data from the evaluation object; and The evaluation object data related to the second operation path information is extracted from the operation record data according to the identification symbol, and the extracted evaluation object data is evaluated for each vehicle operator, and a summarized evaluation value is output. A report data is generated based on the driving evaluation apparatus as described in claim 1.

Images