TW201814630A - System and method for processing information and mentoring people - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for processing information for mentoring service to at-risk people is described. Also describes is a system for implementing the method and a tangible computer readable medium for storing instructions that, when executed by computer processor, causes the computer processor to process information according to the method of the present application.

Description

 System and method for processing information and teaching people   [Priority statement]

The present application claims the priority of the following application: U.S. Application Serial No. 15/266,384, filed on Sep. 15, 2016; US Application No. 15/373,869, filed on December 9, 2016; US Application No. 15/623,206, filed on June 14, 2017; and US application filed on August 30, 2017 Case No. 15/691,253. The entire disclosures of the aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

The present invention generally relates to a system and method for processing information and teaching personnel. In particular, the present invention relates to a method for improving the matching between a mentor and a mentee by using instructor information and information of a mentee, and improving the relationship between the instructor and the mentee. The instructor provides a system and method of reward.

Even if the current mentoring system operates on a small scale for a short period of time, such teaching systems can have a significant impact on, for example, children in distress and those who have just been released from prison. However, in the current teaching system, there is no quantitative method to pair a potential facilitator with a potential instructor to maximize the probability of an instructor-director relationship succeeding on a long-term basis. In addition, in the current teaching system, the instructor does not receive financial rewards for becoming a successful instructor, and rarely receives continuous rewards to establish a long-term support relationship with the mentee. In addition, there is far more demand for instructors than those currently available to current instructors.

Therefore, there is a need for a system and method for improving the pairing between an instructor and a facilitator. There is also a need for a system and method for long-term financial rewards for successful instructors to substantially increase the supply of instructors.

One aspect of the present application relates to a method for processing information to provide a mentoring service to a person in crisis, comprising the steps of executing one of the applications on one or more computer processors One of the user interfaces receives a personal profile of one of the objects in crisis, wherein the personal profile includes a person profile, a crisis profile, and a plurality of menee matching tags, the crisis profile including a plurality of crisis factors; assigning a crisis point value to the one or more computer processors based on a severity level of the object's crisis factor and a risk point matrix stored on a memory device Each of the crisis factors, the memory device is accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database that reflects the crisis of other objects and such Other objects are later a comparison of success or failure and estimated lifetime social costs; borrowed by the one or more computer processors The one or more computer processors determine a total crisis point value of the object in crisis; if the total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined threshold, accepting the object in crisis as a candidate for the leader (mentee candidate); searching for a mentor candidate database comprising one of a plurality of instructor profiles by the one or more computer processors, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plural The instructor matches the tag; the at least one instructor candidate is assigned to the subject candidate by the one or more computer processors, wherein the at least one instructor candidate matches the instructor based on the referee matching tags Selecting between one of the tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; submitting the assigned at least one instructor candidate to an oversight committee for approval; establishing an instructor-guided After the mentor-mentee relationship, the user interface of the application receives the threat Progress report of the object in the object; comparing the progress of the victim in the crisis with the success rate of the in-crisis individual stored in a memory device or the success rate of the prior criminal by the one or more computer processors The memory device is accessible by the one or more computer processors; and the one or more computer processors obtain: (1) an income tax record of the object in crisis from the relevant government agency, (2) Retirement plan (eg, 401(k)) investment information and/or education plan (eg, 529 plan) investment information from the relevant financial institution in the crisis; by the one or more computer processors based on To determine financial incentives for one of the instructors: the result of the comparison step; the income tax record of the subject in crisis; the retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the target in crisis; Expected lifetime social costs; approval of the amount of the financial incentive from the supervisory committee; and notification of one of the approved amounts To the relevant government agency.

Another aspect of the present application relates to a system for processing information to provide a teaching service to a person in crisis, comprising: one or more computer processors; and one or more tangible non-transitory computers readable Media, accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media are included to be executed by the one or more processors when executed by the one or more processors The following instructions: receiving, by a user interface of one of the applications on the one or more computer processors, a crisis profile for one of the objects in crisis, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors and the The expected lifetime social cost of the object in crisis; one or more computer processors based on one of the object's crisis factors, the severity level of the subject and the expected lifetime social cost of the subject, and one of the memory devices stored on a memory device The crisis point matrix assigns a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors, and the memory device is accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the crisis point matrix is borrowed Determined by evaluating a large database that reflects the crisis of other objects and the subsequent success or failure of these other objects and the expected lifetime social cost; by the one or more computer processors One or more computer processors determine a total crisis point value of the object in crisis; if the total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined threshold, accepting the object in crisis as a candidate for the leader; Searching for a library of instructor candidates comprising a plurality of instructor profiles by the one or more computer processors, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; by the one or A plurality of computer processors assigning at least one instructor candidate to the subject candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on matching the one of the tutor matching tags with one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the The matching is performed using a matching algorithm; the assigned at least one instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee Approving; after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, receiving the progress report of the victim in the user interface of the application; the one or more computer processors are in crisis The progress of the object is compared to the progress achieved by other individuals in crisis stored in a memory device and the probability of success or the progress of the criminal and the probability of success, the memory device being configurable by the one or more computer processors Accessing; by the one or more computer processors: (1) an income tax record of the person in crisis from the relevant government agency, and/or (2) the object in crisis from the relevant financial institution Retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information; the financial reward for one of the instructors is determined by the one or more computer processors based on the following: the result of the comparison step, the income tax record of the subject in crisis Retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the target in crisis, and expected lifetime social cost; The member will obtain approval for the amount of the financial award; and will transmit a notice of the approved amount to the relevant government agency.

Another aspect of the present application is directed to a tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising, when executed by a computer processor, causing the processor to execute an instruction to receive by a user interface on a computer A crisis profile of a crisis target, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors; a computer processor based on the severity level of the object's crisis factor and a crisis point stored on a memory device The matrix assigns a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors, and the memory device is accessible by the computer processor, wherein the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database that reflects other objects. The crisis and the other objects are later the success or failure and the estimated lifetime social cost; the computer processor determines the total crisis point value of the one of the objects in crisis by the one or more computer processors; The total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined threshold, and the object in crisis is accepted as a receiver candidate; by the computer processor A searcher candidate database comprising a plurality of instructor profiles, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; the computer processor assigns at least one instructor candidate to the director a candidate candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; At least one instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee for approval; after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, the user interface of the application receives a progress report of the object in crisis; with the computer The processor compares the progress of the object in crisis with the probability of success of the in-crisis individual stored on a memory device or the success rate of the prior criminal, the memory device being accessible by the computer processor; The computer processor is: (1) the crisis from the relevant government agencies The income tax record of the object, and/or (2) the retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the crisis-related object from the relevant financial institution, and/or (3) the crime of the object in crisis The incarceration record and its associated costs, and/or (4) the amount of the welfare and/or food stamp payment received by the subject in crisis; the instructor is determined by the one or more computer processors based on the following One of the financial rewards: the result of the comparison step, the income tax record of the person in crisis, the retirement plan investment information of the target in crisis and/or the education plan investment information, and the expected life-long society due to criminal activities Cost, prison costs, court costs, welfare payments, food stamp payments, and similar social costs; the financial reward for one of the instructors is determined by the computer processor based on the following: the result of the comparison step, and the crisis The income tax record of the object and the estimated lifetime social cost; the approval of the amount of the financial incentive from the supervisory committee; A notice of the approved amount is transmitted to the relevant government agency, wherein the financial reward is provided to the instructor in the form of a cash remuneration, wherein the amount of the cash remuneration is calculated as one of the following percentages: The income tax of the object in the crisis, the annual retirement plan investment information and/or the education plan investment of the target in crisis, or the amount of the cash compensation reflects the following compensation: the recipient reaches one or more milestones or Avoiding incidents that would result in social costs, and where the notice would cause the relevant government agency to issue one of the approved amounts.

100‧‧‧Computer System/System/Server

102‧‧‧ memory

108‧‧‧Output device

110‧‧‧ display device

112‧‧‧Auxiliary storage/auxiliary storage

114‧‧‧Processor

116‧‧‧ Input device

118‧‧‧Network

200‧‧‧Recipient Database

201‧‧‧Crisis Database

202‧‧‧Individual Success Rate Database in Crisis

204‧‧‧Successful probability database

206‧‧‧Instructor Database

208‧‧‧Instructor Qualification Database

210‧‧‧Instructor Performance Database

212‧‧‧Instructor Award Database

300‧‧‧ method

302, 304, 306, 308, 310‧‧‧ blocks

For ease of understanding of the present application, reference is made to the following drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to the The drawings are merely exemplary in order to illustrate some features that may be used alone or in any combination with other features, and the invention should not be limited to the illustrated embodiments.

1 shows an embodiment of the system of the present application; FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the database structure of the present application; and FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of exemplary steps of the method of the present application.

The detailed description below is intended to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the present application. To facilitate explanation, specific terms are set forth to achieve a thorough understanding of the present application. However, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that such specific details are not required to practice the subject matter of the present application. Descriptions of specific applications are provided merely as representative examples. The application is not limited to the illustrated embodiments, but is to be accorded the broadest possible scope of the principles and features disclosed herein.

This description is intended to be read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are considered to be a part of the entire written description of the application. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, and are in the

As used herein, the term "at-risk" refers to an individual, group, group, or subgroup that is considered to be more likely to fail socially, economically, academically, or morally. . This term may apply to persons facing situations that may jeopardize their ability to complete their studies, employment or retention or avoidance of criminal activity. The ratio of such persons may be higher than the average: homelessness, poverty, imprisonment, teenage pregnancy, serious health problems, domestic violence, transiency, gang activity, drug use, or other criminal activity Or status. Such personnel may also have learning disabilities, low test scores, disciplinary issues, retention, or other learning-related factors that have an adverse impact.

The term "recidivism" as used herein refers to a recurrent or habitual fall into a behavior such as a crime, or a chronic tendency to repeatedly appear in a criminal behavioral pattern or an antisocial behavioral pattern.

As used herein, the term "mentee" refers to an individual in crisis who agrees to receive guidance, guidance, support, and encouragement to be responsible for helping the facilitator become an individual in a successful society.

As used herein, the term "mentor" refers to an individual who provides guidance, guidance, support, and encouragement to a facilitator to help the facilitator become a successful member of society.

As used herein, the term "wireless" means any wireless signal, material, communication or other interface, including but not limited to Wi-Fi protocol (Wi-Fi), Bluetooth, third generation mobile communication. (3G), High Speed Downlink Packet Access/High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSDPA/HSUPA), Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) (eg, narrowband-95A (IS-95A) , Wideband Coded Multiple Access (WCDMA), FSHS, Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS), Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Personal Area Network/802.15 (PAN/802.15), Global Interoperable microwave access (Wi-MAX (802.16)), 802.20, narrowband/frequency division multiple access (narrowband/FDMA), orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), process control system/decentralized control system (PCS/ DCS), analog cellular cellular, cellular digital packet data (CDPD), satellite systems, millimeter wave systems or microwave systems, acoustics, and infrared (ie, Infrared Data Association (IrDA)).

As used herein, the term "internet (internet, interchangeable)" refers to an inter-network, including but not limited to the Internet.

The term "memory" as used herein includes any type of integrated circuit or other storage device suitable for storing digital data, including but not limited to read only memory (ROM), programmable read only memory. (PROM), electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM), double data rate/2 synchronous dynamic random access Memory (DDR/2 SDRAM), extended data output/fast page mode (EDO/FPMS), delayed reduced dynamic random access memory (RLDRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), "flash" Flash) memory (eg, NAND/NOR), and pseudo-static random access memory (PSRAM).

As used herein, the term "computer processor" refers to all types of digital processing devices, including but not limited to digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (reduced instruction set computers). ; RISC), general purpose (complex instruction set computer (CISC)) processor, microprocessor, gate array (eg, field programmable gate array (FPGA)), programmable logic device (PLD), reconfigurable computing Reconfigurable compute fabric (RCF), array processor, and application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Such a digital processor can be included on a single monolithic integrated circuit die or distributed across multiple components.

The term "at-risk subject's income tax records" as used herein includes federal income tax records, state income tax records, and/or city income tax records for objects in crisis, and in certain In the embodiment, the federal income tax record, state income tax record, and/or city income tax record of the household in the crisis are also included.

The term "cost to society" used in this article includes the following costs: benefits, food stamps, unemployment benefits, Medicaid, underage pregnancy, drug use, crime, imprisonment, unpaid Income tax, failed to graduate from college, etc. The term "lifetime cost to society" includes the following finals: welfare, food stamps, unemployment benefits, low-income medical assistance, underage pregnancy, drug use, crime, imprisonment, unpaid income tax, failure Graduated from college.

One of the basic premises of the present invention is "successful success." Individuals who are exposed to and guided by successful people have a greater chance of becoming successful. Individuals who lack a successful role model in life are more likely to fail or re-offend. Therefore, this application seeks to link children and adults in crisis (collectively referred to as "individuals in crisis") with instructors who will be economically motivated throughout life to ensure the success of such individuals. The instructor will be rewarded based on the future success of his or her faculty, for example, by a portion of his or her evaluator’s income tax or by some other measure reflecting the successful success of the mentee as a productive citizen. . As a result, the instructor will be motivated for many years to advise, coach, plead, train his or her mentors, and otherwise influence the success of their mentors. The instructor will want to educate the mentee, avoid crime and drug use, and will even be motivated to help the mentee get a good job. The instructor will be interested in giving full attention to the long-term success of the mentee. The instructor can share his or her wisdom, provide work for the mentee, or suggest certain positions or opportunities for the mentee. The instructors' friends and relatives can also be motivated to help the mentee, so it will be beneficial to the instructor. The same principle can be applied to prisoners who have served their sentences. For these instructors, the economic incentives can be based on the income tax of their mentors for several years, or the economic rewards can also include targeting certain milestones (eg college graduation, university entrance, university graduation, avoidance of future crimes, avoidance) In the future, serving a sentence, etc.) or for each day or week or month or year, the mentee has no criminal activity and avoids one of the social costs of bonuses.

Based on the success of various social and charitable projects that lack any type of long-term economic incentive, the applicant has come to the conclusion that a well-implemented large-scale work can fundamentally improve the success of people in crisis of all ages, while Improve ethnic relations and reduce crime, welfare costs (and other social costs) and reduce Treasury bonds by trillions of dollars.

Method of processing information to provide teaching services to people in crisis

One aspect of the present application relates to a method for processing information to provide a teaching service to a person in crisis. The method comprises the steps of: receiving a crisis profile of a target in crisis by one of a user interface executing one of the applications on one or more computer processors, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors; Assigning a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors by one or more computer processors based on a severity level of the crisis factor of the object and a crisis point matrix stored on a memory device, the memory device can be Accessing by one or more computer processors; determining, by the one or more computer processors, a total crisis point value of the object by the application; and when the total crisis point value reaches a predetermined threshold value, Accept the object in crisis as a candidate for a guide. In some embodiments, the higher the severity level of a crisis, the higher the crisis point is assigned. If the total crisis point value equals or exceeds the predetermined threshold, the total crisis point value reaches the threshold. In other embodiments, the higher the severity level of one of the crises, the lower the crisis point assigned. If the total crisis point value is equal to or lower than the predetermined threshold, the total crisis point value reaches the threshold.

Examples of crisis factors include, but are not limited to, age, gender, race, weight, height, work history, history of traffic violations, alcohol consumption, history of drug abuse, personal medical history, academic performance at school, attendance at school, and decent behavior at school Sex (such as avoiding fights, bullying, deception, or other sabotage), extracurricular activities, gang participation, personality assessment, assessment of siblings and/or parents and/or guardians, probability of dropping out, probability of pregnancy, probability of crime, smoking Probability of illicit drugs, work history, probability of habitual unemployment, probability of returning to prison, and other crisis factors.

In some embodiments, the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a database that reflects the crisis of other objects against the subsequent success or failure of the other objects and the estimated lifetime social cost. In some embodiments, the crisis database contains information about a large number of people in crisis, crisis factors associated with each of the people in crisis, and follow-up of each person in crisis (follow-up )News. This information is a combination of various sources of information such as school records, motor vehicle management (DMV) records, police records and alteration records, personal medical records, financial transaction records, and tax records. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of generating a database that reflects the crisis of other objects against the subsequent success or failure of the other objects and the estimated lifetime social cost.

In some embodiments, ontology related artificial intelligence is utilized to improve the functionality of the crisis database. Ontology is a technology in computer technology that divides the variables required in complex computational processes and establishes the fundamental relationships between the variables. Since the original data is collected from various sources in different contexts (eg, school records and police records), the semantic variables may have different names in different sources, making this variable difficult to identify. In some embodiments, the crisis point matrix is derived from the crisis database using an artificial intelligence method, the artificial intelligence method comprising the steps of: identifying semantic information from a different information source; analyzing the semantic information and analyzing it with one or Compare the semantics of multiple other sources of information; discover possible relationships between semantic information from different sources; and establish an ontology for the crisis database. In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence method is implemented by an artificial intelligence module.

The term "user interface of an application" as used herein means, but is not limited to, providing information to a user or other entity and/or receiving information from a user or other entity. Any visual means, graphical means, tactile means, audible means, sensory means, digital means or other means. One of the application user interfaces includes means for receiving information from a tangible storage medium (eg, a flash drive) or from the Internet.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of assigning an instructor candidate to the object in crisis by the one or more computer processors, wherein the instructor is selected from one of the instructor candidates on a memory device The memory device is accessible by the one or more computer processors; and the assigned instructor is approved by an oversight committee.

In certain embodiments, the supervisory committee may include at least one member from a local community, at least one member with experience in adolescent transformation, and/or at least one member from a criminal justice system. In some embodiments, the supervisory committee also includes representatives from a local government, state government, or federal government. In some embodiments, the supervisory committee includes representatives from one of the local government, the state government, or one of the federal government's tax authorities.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of searching for a library of instructor candidates comprising one of a plurality of instructor profiles by the one or more computer processors, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a Teaching the experience and a plurality of instructors to match the tags; and assigning at least one instructor candidate to the subject candidate by the one or more computer processors, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is based on the tag matching tags of the instructors Selecting is matched to one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm.

In some embodiments, the instructor candidate database contains instructor personal information such as gender, age, race, marital status, health status, education, work history, and teaching experience and performance. In some embodiments, the initial assignment to the instructor is determined by a computer program that uses a set of instructor matching criteria to match the candidate in crisis with the instructor in the instructor candidate database .

In some embodiments, the initial assignment to the instructor is determined by an artificial intelligence module based on a crisis profile of the subject in crisis and information stored in the instructor qualification database. In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence module includes a user interface to enable a programmer to construct an artificial intelligence model, train the artificial intelligence model to provide a trained artificial intelligence model, and deploy the trained artificial Wisdom model for instructor selection.

In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence module is configured to train the artificial intelligence model with training data from one or more training data sources (eg, data from the instructor candidate database) in one or more training cycles. . In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence module proposes an artificial intelligence model based on a combined assembly code generated by writing one of the source codes in a teaching programming language. The source code includes a mental model that learns one or more concept modules from the use of training materials by the artificial intelligence model and includes one of the artificial intelligence models for training on the one or more concept modules. Or the total course of multiple courses is formed. Each of the one or more courses is structured to selectively use a different training data stream. The training course may include selecting instructors and/or mentees based on certain factors, such as instructors, including their relevant occupations and lifetime success, their emotional maturity, their work and family status, and their cost. Time to become a successful instructor's ability and willingness, and other factors, and if it is a mentee, these factors include age, family situation, ethnicity, school performance, school attendance, dropout rate, gang participation Or temptation, drug use, criminal activity, maturity, and other factors.

The AI module allows for a learning process to increase the chances of a successful instructor-guided match.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the steps of: receiving a progress report of the object in crisis by the user interface of the application after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship; and by one or more The computer processor compares the progress of the object in crisis with the progress achieved by other individuals in crisis on a memory device and the probability of success or the progress and success rate of other criminals, the memory The device can be accessed by the one or more computer processors.

In some embodiments, the method further includes the step of: recovering from the crisis reduction database by the one or more computer processors from a memory device to learn how to reduce the risk factors Information on the crisis associated with one or more; and electronically delivering the information to the Supervisory Committee and/or one of the instructors and/or the mentors of the mentee approved by the Supervisory Board by the one or more computer processors Or guardian. In some embodiments, the information is delivered to a wireless device associated with the instructor on a wireless communication channel.

In some embodiments, the crisis reduction database is periodically updated with new methods and/or devices for reducing crises. In some embodiments, the crisis reduction database is supplemented with a search program that continuously searches the Internet to find out the emergence of new crises and improved or new methods/devices for reducing/avoiding the crisis. . In some embodiments, ontology-related artificial intelligence is utilized to improve the functionality of the crisis reduction database. In some embodiments, the crisis reduction database is part of a crisis database.

In some other embodiments, the method further includes the step of: learning, by one or more computer processors, from one of the databases stored on a memory device, how to reduce one of the crisis factors Information relating to a plurality of associated crises; and electronically delivering an alert to the instructor (or other appropriate interested party) on the wireless communication channel by the one or more computer processors to The instructor is associated with one of the wireless devices, wherein the reminder activates an application on the wireless device to cause the wireless device to connect to the one or more computer processors via the Internet and download the information.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of: receiving, after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, a progress report of the object in crisis by a user interface of the application; by the one or The plurality of computer processors compare the progress of the victim in crisis with the probability of success or the success rate of the criminal in a crisis device stored on a memory device, the memory device being executable by the one or more computers Processor access; providing a financial reward to the instructor based on the result of the comparing step by the one or more computer processors; and maintaining an instructor reward database by the one or more computer processors, wherein the instructor The reward database is stored on one of the tangible media that can be accessed by the one or more computer processors. In some embodiments, the results of the financial reward calculations are subject to review by an oversight committee and, if necessary, timely adjustments may be made to the mentors who are not attracted to the appropriate instructor. The Supervisory Board's review ensures that all relevant factors are considered to balance the supply and demand of the instructor and the mentee at a particular point in time in a particular area.

In some embodiments, the progress report includes the current educational status of the mentee, marital status, various crisis factor status, health status, mental status, and the like. In some embodiments, the computer processor assigns an integral value to each of the states to obtain a total score for each progress report. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of: identifying semantic information from the progress report of the object in crisis. In certain embodiments, the progress report is made every 1 month, every 2 months, every 3 months, every 4 months, or every 6 months, or at other appropriate time intervals. Progress reports on subjects in crisis can be submitted by parents or guardians or teachers of subjects in crisis and/or in crisis.

In some embodiments, the semantic information from the progress report of the object in crisis is used to determine the probability of success or the success rate of the criminal in the crisis in the object of the crisis, which is based on the use of artificial intelligence modules. Calculated by storing information on the success rate database of a person in crisis or the success rate database of a former criminal.

In some embodiments, the financial reward is provided in the form of (1) cash remuneration for one of the instructors, (2) investment in one of the instructor's retirement plans (eg, 401(k) account, (3) pair An investment in one of the instructor's education savings plan (eg, 529 Program and Education Savings Account), (4) an income tax credit in the form of a federal income tax credit, state income tax credit, urban income tax credit, or a combination thereof, and / or "points" that can be provided by an outside company that wishes to promote the success of the project. The term "Point" as used herein may be broadly stated to mean the value that can be redeemed for a good or service, such as an airline "point." The term "retirement plan" as used in this article may be broadly stated to include the "Defined Contribution Benefit Plan" which includes employees or their assignees as plan beneficiaries. These plans include but Not limited to 401(k) plan, 403(b) plan, employee stock ownership plan, simple individual retirement account ("Simple Individual Retirement Account (Simple IRA)"), simplified employee pension plan (simplified employee pension plan; SEP), and profit sharing plan. The amount of financial incentives is calculated based on the behavior of the person in crisis and/or the achievement of the target in crisis and/or the income tax or the estimated lifetime social cost of the person in crisis. In some embodiments, the amount of the financial incentive is calculated based on the behavior of the subject in crisis during the previous year and/or the personal income tax and/or household income tax of the subject in crisis. The income tax of the object may include federal income tax, state income tax, city income tax, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the amount of the financial incentive is calculated based on the estimated income tax amount of the subject in crisis and/or the estimated lifetime social cost of the subject in crisis. In some embodiments, the amount of the financial incentive is calculated based on an investment in a retirement plan (eg, a 401(k) plan). In some embodiments, the amount of the financial incentive is calculated based on an investment in an educational program (eg, the 529 program) by the subject in crisis. In some embodiments, the amount of the financial incentive is calculated based on one or more of the following factors: personal income tax payments for the person in crisis, household income tax payments for the person in crisis, crisis An investment in a retirement plan (such as 401(k)) and an investment in a crisis-to-information program (such as the 529 program).

In some embodiments, if the subject in crisis reaches certain goals, the financial reward is provided to the instructor as a bonus.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises one or more of the following steps: preferably obtaining the estimated income tax and/or the estimated lifetime social cost of the subject in crisis from the relevant government agency.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the steps of obtaining federal tax and/or local tax (eg, state tax and city tax) payment information from the subject in crisis; and verifying the federal tax and the corresponding government agency / or local tax (for example, state tax and city tax) payment information. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of obtaining, from the subject in crisis, permission to access personal income tax information or family income tax information for the subject in crisis from the relevant government agency.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the steps of: obtaining retirement plan investment information and/or education savings plan information from the object in crisis; and verifying the retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment by the relevant financial institution News. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of obtaining permission from the underlying object to access retirement plan information and/or educational program information for the subject in crisis in the relevant financial institution.

In certain embodiments, the method further comprises the step of determining an amount of cash remuneration and/or bonus (in the form of an income tax deduction) for the instructor; obtaining approval from the supervisory committee; from a relevant government agency (eg, the United States) The State Administration of Taxation (IRS), the State Tax Department, or the City Tax Department are approved; and the amount approved by the government agency for remuneration.

In some embodiments, the financial reward is provided in the form of points provided to the instructor, wherein the method further includes the step of calculating the amount of the integral reward as one of the following percentages: (1) the income tax of the object in crisis Money, and/or (2) the target of a crisis in an investment in a retirement plan and/or education plan for a person in crisis, and/or (3) the object in crisis is avoiding a negative social cost Performance in terms of consequences and events.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of transmitting a reward notification to a department, company, agency or financial institution responsible for the instructor's remuneration, wherein the notification causes the department, company, agency or financial institution to reflect The instructor's progress is treated in a manner that is the progress of the instructor or as a reimbursement to the instructor in the process of supporting the instructor.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of transmitting a reminder of one of the instructors' cash rewards to a relevant government agency (eg, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to issue one of the cash payments . In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of: transmitting a reminder to an instructor of an income tax credit to a relevant government agency (eg, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to enter the tax credit To the instructor's tax record.

In some embodiments, the method comprises the steps of: obtaining income tax information from a relevant government agency or obtaining retirement/education plan investment information from a related company, institution or institution; determining a cash remuneration and/or bonus of the instructor (in income tax) One of the amount of the form; the approval from the supervisory committee; notify the relevant government agency (for example, the US Internal Revenue Service, the state tax authority, or the city tax authority) of the approved amount, where the notice causes the relevant government agency to process the instructor Remuneration is paid electronically to one of the bank accounts designated by the instructor.

a system for processing information to provide teaching services to people in crisis

Another aspect of the present application relates to a system for collecting and/or processing information and using the information to provide teaching services to persons in crisis. The system includes: one or more computer processors; and one or more tangible, non-transitory computer readable media accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the one or more tangible non-transitory computers The readable medium includes instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to: use one of the applications executed on the one or more computer processors The interface receives a crisis profile for one of the objects in crisis, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors; the severity level of the crisis factor based on the object is stored in one or more tangible non-transitory computers readable A crisis point matrix on the media assigns a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media being accessible by the one or more computer processors; determining one of the objects The value of the crisis point; and when the total crisis point value reaches a predetermined threshold, accepting the object in crisis as a candidate for the leader. In some embodiments, the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database that reflects the crisis of other objects and the subsequent success or failure of the other objects and the estimated lifetime social cost. .

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform one or more of the following steps An instruction to search a database of instructor candidates comprising a plurality of instructor profiles by the one or more computer processors, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; One or more computer processors assign at least one instructor candidate to the subject candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, Wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; the assigned at least one instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee for approval; after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, by the user of the application The interface receives a progress report of the object in crisis; the object in crisis is caused by the one or more computer processors Advances in storage compared with the progress of the reach of individuals in crisis and other success rate or probability of success and progress ex-prisoners on a memory device, the memory device by the one or more computer processors access.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further comprise, when executed by one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to perform one or more of the following steps Instruction: assigning an instructor candidate to an object in crisis, wherein the instructor candidate is selected from a library of instructor qualifications on a tangible memory device, the tangible memory device being storable by the one or more computer processors Taking from the database stored on the one or more tangible memory devices by the one or more computer processors to learn how to reduce the crisis associated with one or more of the crisis factors Information; electronically delivered to the supervisory committee by a computer processor and/or approved by one of the supervisory committees; after establishing an instructor-director relationship, receiving the user interface through one of the applications Progress report of the object in crisis; the progress of the object in crisis and the crisis in a memory device by one or more processes Comparing the probability of success or the success rate of the prior criminal, the memory device is accessible by the one or more computer processors; the financial reward is provided to the instructor by the one or more processors based on the result of the comparing step And maintaining, by the one or more processors, an instructor reward database, wherein the instructor rewards database is stored on a tangible memory device accessible by the one or more processors.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media are further included to, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform an improvement using ontology-related artificial intelligence An instruction of one of the functions of the crisis database.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media are further included when executed by one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to perform artificial intelligence to be in crisis The candidate performs an instruction to match one of the processes with the instructor in the instructor candidate database.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further comprise, when executed by one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to perform one or more of the following steps Directive: Obtain information on income tax from relevant government agencies; determine the amount of cash remuneration and/or bonus (in the form of income tax deduction) of the instructor; obtain approval from the supervisory committee; from relevant government agencies (for example, the US Internal Revenue Service) , the state tax department or the city tax department) is approved; and the amount approved by the government agency for remuneration is processed.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further comprises instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the following steps: The notice is transmitted to a department, company or agency responsible for the instructor's remuneration, wherein the notification causes the department, company or agency to process the instructor's remuneration.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further includes instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of: instructing an instructor One of the cash rewards is sent to a relevant government agency (for example, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to pay one of the cash payments. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the step of: transmitting a reminder to an instructor of an income tax credit to a relevant government agency (eg, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to enter the tax credit To the instructor's tax record.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further comprise, when executed by the one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to execute the income tax information from the relevant government agency Instructions for the steps. In certain embodiments, the obtaining steps described above are replaced with the following steps or in combination with the expected income tax and/or the estimated lifetime social cost of the subject in crisis from the relevant government agency.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media further includes instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of: determining an instructor One of the amount of cash remuneration and/or bonus (in the form of income tax deduction or cash remuneration); obtained from the Supervisory Committee; notified to the relevant government agency (for example, the US Internal Revenue Service, the State Taxation Department, or the Urban Tax Department) The amount in which the notification causes the relevant government agency to process the instructor's remuneration and electronically deliver the remuneration to one of the bank accounts designated by the instructor.

In some embodiments, the system further includes one or more of the following databases: a success rate database of the individuals in crisis, a success rate database of the former criminals, a qualification database of the instructors, and performance data of the instructors Library and instructor's reward database. In some embodiments, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media are further included to, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform an improvement using ontology-related artificial intelligence One of the functions of the following database: the success rate database of the individuals in crisis, the success rate database of the former criminals, the qualification database of the instructors, the performance database of the instructors, and the reward database of the instructors.

Computer system for rewarding instructors of mentors in crisis

Another aspect of the present application is directed to a computer system for generating and/or maintaining an instructor rewards database and providing incentives to instructors of a constrained in a crisis. The computer system includes a computer processor and one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media accessible by the computer processor, wherein the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media are included The one or more processors, when executed, cause the one or more processors to execute an instruction to: determine a behavior and progress of a stewards over a period of time; determine the recipient's income during the same time period and Income tax and/or estimated lifetime social cost; and calculating a financial reward for one of the instructors of the faculty, wherein the amount of the financial reward is used in one of the one or more tangible computer readable media The compensation matrix is based on the behavior or achievement of the mentee during the time period (eg, graduating from college, or entering college or graduate from college) and/or income tax payments and/or estimated lifetime social costs. Calculation.

In some embodiments, the reward matrix is generated by an artificial intelligence process based on a set of initial rules and criteria. The AI module can modify these rules and criteria from time to time based on funds and feedback from instructors and users of the computer system.

In some embodiments, the tangible computer readable medium includes instructions stored thereon for selecting an instructor and/or a mentee based on a selection factor: in the case of an instructor, the selection factors include their related occupations And the success of life, its emotional maturity, its work and family status, the time it takes to become a successful instructor, and the other factors, and if it is a mentor, the selection factors include Age, family situation, school performance, school attendance, dropout rate, gang participation or temptation, drug use, criminal activity, maturity, and other factors. In some embodiments, the tangible computer readable medium includes instructions stored thereon for selecting an instructor and/or a mentee by an artificial intelligence process.

In some embodiments, the tangible computer readable medium, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to: (1) receive information about a potential instructor candidate or a potential mentee candidate A selection profile, wherein the selection profile includes a plurality of selection factors, instructor qualifications, and/or a crisis faced by the mentee; (2) based on the qualifications of the instructor, the severity level of the crisis of the potential mentee candidate, and storage Assigning a selection point value to potential candidates in the crisis point matrix in the memory device, wherein the higher the score is the better the score; (3) assigning other options based on other selection factors in the potential candidate's selection profile The point value is given to the object, wherein the higher the score is the better the score; (4) the total candidate point value of one of the potential candidates is determined; and (5a) if the total candidate point value is equal to or exceeds a predetermined threshold, then Accepting a potential candidate as a teacher candidate or a mentee candidate; or (5b) rejecting the potential candidate as a teacher candidate or a mentee if the total crisis point value is below a predetermined threshold Selector. In some embodiments, the rating system in steps (2) and (3) is designed such that the lower the score (including the negative score), the better the score, and in step (5a), If the total candidate point value is equal to or lower than a predetermined threshold, accept the potential candidate as a teacher candidate or a mentee candidate, or in step (5b), if the total candidate point value exceeds one If the threshold is predetermined, the potential candidate is rejected as a learner candidate or a mentee candidate.

In some embodiments, the tangible computer readable media stores estimated social costs and actual social costs associated with "failed" to become productive children. Examples of such costs include, but are not limited to, the following costs: benefits, food stamps, unemployment benefits, low-income medical assistance, underage pregnancy, drug use, crime, imprisonment, unpaid income tax, failure to graduate from college, and A crisis point matrix. In some embodiments, the tangible computer readable medium includes, when executed by a processor, causing the processor to: (1) receive a crisis profile for one of the subject objects, wherein the crisis profile includes Multiple Crisis Factors, which include object dropouts or fail in a variety of other ways that are achievable by the mentor under appropriate guidance, are costly (in real dollars and/or opportunity costs) for society. The severity level of probability; (2) assessing the expected value of the life of the mentee from a social perspective and comparing this to the value achievable under appropriate guidance; (3) the recommendation to assign to the mentee One of the instructors' reward factors, which will provide a great reward for the instructor, while also enabling the society to retain a significant benefit; and (4) recommending that the income tax will be paid by the mentee as a follow-up to the instructor to ensure that the referee The reward for the role of the member in the success of the process is paid by the tax authority to one of the instructors, or recommended to be expected in the life of the leader. The share of the instructor's contribution to the instructor is paid by the government agency to ensure that the facilitator has the benefit of increasing the success and lowering the expected social cost.

In some embodiments, the one or more tangible, non-transitory computer readable media stores income and income tax information about the family of the mentee and/or the mentee to: (1) serve as an instructor Providing a basis for rewarding the instructor; (2) providing a cycle of analyzing the productivity and success of the pilot relative to the initial probability analysis based on the assessment of the crisis before the facilitator becomes a mentee The foundation of sexuality; and (3) provides a basis for analyzing the productivity and success of the instructor relative to the initial probability analysis based on the assessment of the crisis before the facilitator becomes a mentee.

In some embodiments, the instructor's reward is provided to the instructor in the form of a point reward. The tangible non-transitory computer readable medium further includes instructions for causing the processor to calculate the amount of the integral reward as a percentage of the following when executed by a processor: (1) the income tax of the object in crisis, and / or (2) the target of a crisis in an investment in a retirement plan and/or education plan for a target in crisis, and/or (3) the object in crisis is avoiding the negative consequences and events that would cause social costs Aspect performance.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, further comprising, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to: obtain federal tax and/or local taxation from an object in crisis ( For example, state tax and city tax) information; and verification of federal tax and/or local tax (for example, state tax and city tax) information by the corresponding government agency. In some embodiments, the tangible non-transitory computer readable medium is further included when executed by a processor to cause the processor to: obtain an access to the relevant government agency from an object in crisis Permission to personal income tax information or family income tax information for individuals in crisis.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, further comprising, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to: obtain retirement information investment information and/or education from an object in crisis Savings plan information; and verifying the retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information by relevant financial institutions. In some embodiments, the tangible non-transitory computer readable medium further comprises, when executed by a processor, causing the processor to: obtain an access to the relevant financial institution from an object in crisis Permission to retired program information and/or educational program information for the target in crisis.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium stores the recidivism rate of the prior criminal and compares it with the recidivism rate of the prior sect of the mentee, and keeps track of the intention to help guide the guilty The successful instructor moves and keeps track of the income of the mentee and the income tax to: (1) provide a basis for the instructor to give the mentee avoidance of future crimes and future imprisonment; (2) to judge the instructor Actions and strategies provide the basis for which types of mentors are most successful; (3) provide a basis for determining which instructors' qualities and/or qualifications are most helpful for which types of mentors; (4) The instructor assigns a time period reflecting the period in which the facilitator has avoided the crime and/or the income tax paid by the ombudsman and/or the social cost of the ombudsman; (5) providing a continuous database that can be analyzed The library assigns future instructor reward rates based on the success of the teaching project; and (6) provides a basis for analyzing the overall cost of recidivism (in terms of court costs, prison costs, and social costs) . A higher amount of income tax paid by a former offender may be a small fraction of the overall social benefit achieved by such a project.

In some embodiments, the tangible non-transitory computer readable medium is stored, when executed by one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to perform an instruction using an artificial intelligence process to calculate the estimated society Cost, performance analysis of the success rate of the commissioner, and calculation of the instructor's reward.

Tangible non-transitory computer readable media

Another aspect of the present application is directed to a tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium. The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium includes instructions stored thereon for providing a teaching service to a person in crisis, the instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the following steps: Executing one of the application interfaces on the computer processor to receive a crisis profile for one of the objects in crisis, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors; a severity level and storage based on the crisis factor of the object Assigning a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors on one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media, the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media Accessing; determining a total crisis point value for the object; and accepting the object in crisis as a recipient candidate when the total crisis point value reaches a predetermined threshold.

In some embodiments, the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database that reflects the crisis of other objects and the subsequent success or failure of these other objects and the comparison of social costs.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium includes instructions for causing the computer processor to perform one or more of the following steps when executed by a computer processor: One of a plurality of instructor profiles, the inquirer candidate database is searched, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; at least one instructor candidate is assigned to each of the instructors by a computer processor a candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; the at least assigned An instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee for approval; after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, the user interface of the application receives a progress report of the object in crisis; by computer processor The progress of the object in crisis and the other being stored on a memory device The progress of the individual machine reached its probability of success and progress or other ex-prisoners comparing the probability of success, the memory device access by the computer processor.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium further includes instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to: assign an instructor candidate to an object in crisis, wherein The instructor candidate is selected from a library of instructor qualifications on a tangible, non-transitory memory device that is accessible by the processor; is stored in one or more by one or more computer processors Information on one of a plurality of tangible memory devices for information on how to reduce the crisis associated with one or more of these crisis factors; and electronic delivery of the information to the supervisory committee via a computer processor And/or one of the instructors approved by the supervisory committee.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium further includes instructions for causing the processor to perform the following steps when executed by a processor: after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, One of the application's user interfaces receives progress reports of objects in crisis; the probability of success of an object in crisis with one or more processors and the probability of being in crisis in an individual memory device Comparing the success rate of the prior criminal, the memory device being accessible by the one or more computer processors; providing the financial reward to the instructor based on the result of the comparing step by the one or more processors; An instructor rewards repository is maintained by the one or more processors, wherein the instructor rewards repository is stored on a tangible, non-transitory memory device accessible by the one or more processors.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, further comprising, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to: obtain federal tax and/or local taxation from an object in crisis ( For example, state tax and city tax) information; and verification of federal tax and/or local tax (for example, state tax and city tax) information by the corresponding government agency. In some embodiments, the tangible non-transitory computer readable medium is further included when executed by a processor to cause the processor to: obtain an access to the relevant government agency from an object in crisis Permission to personal income tax information or family income tax information for individuals in crisis.

In some embodiments, the tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, further comprising, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to: obtain retirement information investment information and/or education from an object in crisis Savings plan information; and verifying retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information by relevant financial institutions. In some embodiments, the tangible non-transitory computer readable medium further comprises, when executed by a processor, causing the processor to: obtain an access to the relevant financial institution from an object in crisis Permission to retired program information and/or educational program information for the target in crisis.

1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary hardware component that can be used to implement processing information and use the information to improve the match between the instructor and the mentee and to improve the relationship between the instructor and the mentee. The various aspects of the system and method of success and rewards for the instructor. A computer system 100 can include and execute programs for performing the functions described herein, including the steps of the methods described above. Although only one processor 114 is shown in FIG. 1, it should be understood that computer system 100 can include multiple processors. Additionally, system 100 can include multiple networked computers. Moreover, a mobile device including some of the same components in computer system 100 can perform the steps of the methods described above. The computer system 100 can be coupled to a network 118 (e.g., the Internet or other network) to receive, query, obtain, and transmit information (e.g., to a user workstation or other user computing device) as described above. ).

The computer system 100 generally includes a memory 102, an auxiliary storage device 112, and a processor 114. Computer system 100 can also include a plurality of processors 114 and be configured, for example, as a plurality of blade servers or other known server configurations. The computer system 100 can also include an input device 116, a display device 110, and an output device 108.

The memory 102 can include random access memory or similar types of memory, and it can store one or more applications executed by the processor 114. The auxiliary storage device 112 can include a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a CD-ROM drive, or other types of non-volatile data storage. Processor 114 may include multiple processors or include one or more multi-core processors. Any type of processor 114 capable of performing the calculations described herein can be used. The processor 114 can execute an application stored in the memory 102 or the auxiliary storage 112 or received from the Internet or other network 118. The processing performed by the processor 114 can be implemented by a software (such as a software module) executed by a computer or other machine. Such applications preferably include instructions that can be executed to carry out the functions and methods described above and illustrated in the various figures herein. The applications provide a graphical user interface (GUI) through which the user can view the application and interact with the application.

Moreover, as described above, the processor 114 can execute one or more software applications to provide the functions described in this specification, and in particular, to perform and implement the steps and functions of the methods described above. These methods and processes can be implemented by software executed by a computer or other machine, such as a software module.

The input device 116 can include any device for inputting information into the computer system 100, such as a touch screen, a keyboard, a mouse, a cursor control device, a microphone, a digital camera, a video recorder, or A camcorder. Input device 116 can be used to input information into the graphical user interface during execution of the methods described above. Display device 110 can include any type of device for presenting visual information, such as a computer monitor or a flat screen display (or mobile device screen). Output device 108 can include any type of device (e.g., a printer) for presenting a hard copy of information and other types of output devices (including speakers or any device for providing information in audio form).

Examples of computer system 100 include a dedicated server computer (eg, a blade server), a personal computer, a laptop, a laptop, a palmtop computer, a network computer, a mobile device, or capable of executing a web browser or execution Any processor-controlled device for other types of applications that interact with the system. If the computer system 100 is a server, the server 100 may not include the input device 116, the display device 110, and the output device 108. Rather, server 100 can be connected to an independent workstation (another computer system) having one of these devices, for example via a network connection.

Although only one computer system 100 is shown in detail, as described above, the computer system 100 can use multiple computer systems or servers to support the user, as appropriate or as needed. Each aspect can also use a backup server or a redundant server to prevent network downtime in the event of a specific server failure. Additionally, while computer system 100 is illustrated as having various components, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the server can include other components or different components. In addition, although various aspects of an embodiment consistent with the above are described as being stored in a memory, those skilled in the art should understand that such aspects can also be stored in other types of computer program products or computer readable. The media may be read from or read from other types of computer program products or computer readable media, such as auxiliary storage devices, including hard disk drives, floppy disk drives, or read-only memory compact disks, or other forms of random storage. Take memory or read-only memory. The computer readable medium can include instructions for controlling a computer system (e.g., computer system 100) to perform a particular method, such as the methods described above.

2 shows a plurality of databases (databases) that can be stored in the memory 102, the auxiliary storage 112, or a combination of the memory 102 and the auxiliary storage 112. For purposes of illustration only, the description will assume that the databases are stored on the auxiliary storage 112. The databases may include any suitable database, such as a file-oriented database, a full-text database, a spatial database, a decentralized database, and a relational database. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that other types of databases may be used. In some embodiments, the database (DB) includes a faculty repository 200 and an instructor database 206. The faculty database 200 can include a crisis database 201, an individual success probability database 202 in crisis, and a success rate database 204. The instructor database 206 can include an instructor qualification database 208, an instructor performance database 210, and an instructor rewards database 212.

Crisis database

The crisis database 201 may contain information about a large number of people in crisis, crisis factors associated with each of the people in crisis, and follow-up information about each of the people in crisis. Such information may be combined from a variety of sources (eg, school records, motor vehicle management records, police records and alteration records, personal medical records, financial transaction records, and tax records). In some embodiments, the crisis database may contain a sub-database that reflects the crisis of the object and whether the object is later successful or failed and the estimated lifetime social cost. In some embodiments, the crisis database 201 may further comprise a sub-database formed by methods and apparatus for crisis reduction.

Individual success rate database in crisis

The individual success probability database 202 in crisis can store a record of a plurality of individuals in crisis. The individual success probability database 202 in crisis can be used to store various attributes or characteristics relating to each of the individuals and their living conditions stored in the repository 202. The various attributes or characteristics stored may include a crisis profile for each of the individuals stored in the child success probability database 202. For example, the individual success probability database 202 in crisis may include, for example, attributes or characteristics of the following: intelligence quotient (IQ), individual success of the school (attendance rate, grade, teacher rating, discipline) Question, etc.), family income of the individual, the block number or postal code of the place where the individual lives, the school where the individual is located, the dropout rate of the school where the individual is located, the family status of the individual's family, the success of the individual's brothers and sisters, and the individual block Crime rates, gang activities in individual neighborhoods, and drug use in individual neighborhoods. In some embodiments, the success probability (Success Odds; SO) is calculated based on the following formula: SO = f (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) = Aa + Bb + Cc+Dd+Ee+Ff+Gg+Hh+Ii+Jj+Kk+Ll

Where a = IQ, b = family income, c = neighborhood assessment, d = school assessment, e = family status, f = sibling success, g = crime rate, h = local drug intake, i = dropout rate, j = Success in school, k = block gang activity, l = other factors, and which can be modified by a factor (eg, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, or L) to modify the weight of each of the impact factors.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that other attributes or characteristics may be stored in the individual success probability database 202 in crisis. Based on such attributes or characteristics, system 100 can use one of a variety of life events to generate a crisis point value for each individual. For the sake of explanation only, the remainder of the invention assumes that the higher the crisis point value, the more likely the individual is in crisis. Those with ordinary knowledge in this technology will readily recognize that crisis point values can be defined such that the lower the crisis point value, the more likely the individual is in crisis. For example, various life events can include graduation from college, graduation from college, becoming a contributing member of society, future drug use, future criminalization, future unemployment, future welfare assistance, or premature death in the future. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that other life events can be calculated using the attributes or characteristics of each individual stored in the individual success probability database 202 in crisis. To generate a crisis point value for each individual, system 100 can assign a certain number of points to each of the life events described above. System 100 can then simply sum all the points to generate a crisis point value. Alternatively, system 100 can assign a weighting factor to each of the life events. Subsequently, system 100 can use the weighting factors and the points to generate a crisis point value for each of the life events described above. Similarly, there may be attributes that are related in a way that affects the crisis of certain individuals in crisis. In such cases, for example, individuals who do well in both siblings may not be affected by gang activities or drug use in the neighborhood; however, if siblings are susceptible to such dangers, the weight of such crises will be magnified. Therefore, the above simple formula can become more complicated because the analysis of the available data proves that there is a correlation between the various crisis factors, which needs to be evaluated by the computer system.

In another aspect of the invention, system 100 may supplement the crisis point values calculated based on the life events described above. For example, system 100 may consider gender, non-academic interests of an individual, which region of the country the individual resides in, and the overall appearance of the individual. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that system 100 can take into account other non-life events. A certain number of crisis points can be assigned to such non-life events. These crises can then be added to the crisis based on life events. Another option is to add these crisis points and then add them to the crisis based on life events. In some embodiments, the individual success probability database in crisis contains a sub-database for one of the children in crisis.

Former criminal success rate database

In one aspect of the invention, a second database may be a successor database 204 of prior criminals. The predecessor success rate database 204 can be functionally similar to the above-described individual success probability database 202 in crisis, except that the database is directed at the offender and not in general for the individual in crisis. The criminal success rate database 204 can be used to store various attributes or characteristics relating to each of the prior criminals stored in the database 204. The various attributes or characteristics stored may include a crisis profile for each of the prior criminals stored in the criminal success rate database 204. For example, the criminal success rate database 204 may include, for example, the following attributes or characteristics: the crime committed by the former criminal, the number of years of imprisonment, the education level of the former criminal, the workplace skills of the former criminal, and the family support system of the criminal. , the personality of the former criminal (which can be assessed by a trained professional), the history of drug abuse of the former offender, the history of the gang’s participation in the criminal, the behavior of the former in prison, and other information that can be re-offended by assessing the history. The factor used. Based on these attributes or characteristics, system 100 can generate a crisis point value for each of the criminals. For the sake of explanation only, the remainder of the invention assumes that the higher the crisis point value, the more likely the criminal is in crisis. Those with ordinary knowledge in this technology will also readily recognize that crisis point values can be defined such that the lower the crisis point value, the more likely the criminals are in crisis. Those of ordinary skill in the art will also readily recognize that other attributes or characteristics may be stored in the success rate database 204 of the prior art. In order to generate a crisis point value for each of the prior criminals, system 100 can assign a certain number of points to each of the attributes or characteristics described above. System 100 can then simply sum all the points to generate a crisis point value. Alternatively, system 100 can assign a weighting factor to each of the attributes or characteristics. System 100 may then use the weighting factors and the points to generate a crisis point value for each of the attributes or characteristics described above. In certain embodiments, such analysis is done while the individual is still in prison.

In some embodiments, the probability of success of a _prior criminal (SO _ExCon ) is evaluated based on the following formula: (SO _ExCon )=f(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i)=Aa+ Bb+Cc+Dd+Ee+Ff+Gg+Hh+Ii+Jj

Where a = committed crime, b = years of imprisonment, c = education, d = workplace skills, e = family support system, f = personality assessment by a trained professional, g = drug abuse history, h = gang participation history, i = behavior in prison, j = other factors found by assessing historical recidivism, and which can be modified by a factor (eg, A, B, C, D, E, F) , G, H, I, or J) to modify the weight of each of the impact factors. As with the formula for individuals in crisis, the above equations may need to become significantly more complex if it is determined that the various factors are related to each other in their effects.

If the probability of success is below a certain level, it is obvious that intervention by an instructor can be very valuable. As the instructor-director relationship continues, information about the influence of the instructor on various “types” of individuals in crisis can also be collected, for example, teaching individuals in crisis who have a 20- to 30% chance of success. Influence and teaching influence on individuals in crisis who have a chance of success of 0% to 10%. In some embodiments, the amount of the instructor's reward may vary depending on the magnitude of the challenge the instructor will face in helping his or her facilitator succeed. In some embodiments, the instructor is assigned to a mentor having the same gender. In some embodiments, the instructor is assigned to a different gender of the mentee. In some embodiments, the instructor is assigned to a mentee belonging to the same ethnic group. In other embodiments, the instructor is assigned to a mentee belonging to a different ethnic group. Other factors to consider when pairing instructors/recipients include the regularity of interaction, geographic distance, the family situation of the instructor, and the working status of the instructor. In some embodiments, the system periodically analyzes past instructor/director pairing data and results and determines which pairs appear to be working and which pairings appear to fail. The knowledge accumulated in the analysis is used to improve future pairings and to give current instructors and mentors advice on what behavioral characteristics should be considered to achieve the best results.

The recidivism crisis of a criminal record can be calculated in a manner similar to the probability of success of an individual in crisis. In some embodiments, an instructor-director relationship is established with a prison instructor while a pilot is in prison, and the instructor continues to teach when the pilot is released from the prison . In some embodiments, the instructor in prison is selected from a person who works in a prison, and the instructor outside the prison is selected from a person who works outside the prison. In some embodiments, the in-teacher instructor is paid based on the recidivism rate of the former prisoner, and the prison instructor is paid based on the income tax of the former prisoner. In some embodiments, the instructor in prison is the same person as the instructor outside the prison.

Instructor database

In one aspect of the invention, a third database can be associated with the instructor database 206. The instructor database 206 can be comprised of a plurality of databases. The instructor database may be comprised, for example, by an instructor qualification database 208, an instructor performance database 210, and an instructor rewards database 212. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that more or fewer databases may be used.

The instructor qualification database 208 can be used to store a plurality of instructor records. For example, the instructor qualification database 208 can store various attributes or characteristics for each of the instructors stored in the instructor qualification database 208. For example, the instructor qualification database 206 can include, for example, attributes or characteristics of each of the instructors' education, occupation, work history, criminal history, health history, drug abuse history, leadership role or position, family status, or may have Any other attribute or characteristic that helps to become a successful instructor. The instructor's qualifications may also include the training courses attended, the books read, or the tests passed, all of which may be related to an instructor preparing for success. These attributes or characteristics can be used to generate an instructor profile for each of the instructors. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that other attributes or characteristics may be used in generating an instructor profile. There may also be "free-form" entries, such as leadership positions in the instructor's community, or recommendations or references provided by the instructor, such as to confirm the instructor's character. The instructor's qualifications can be updated periodically to take into account, for example, new reference or leadership positions. In the longer term, each of the instructors' track records of the success or failure of their mentors will also be an important factor in judging the qualifications of the instructors in the future. Keeping track of each element on a large scale should be able to correlate over time with elements that appear to have an impact on overall teaching success.

The instructor qualification database 208 may also store attributes or characteristics that potentially invalidate the qualification. For example, if a potential instructor volunteers to join the system 100, the potential instructor can be added to the instructor database 206. However, if the potential instructor is later found to be, for example, an alcoholic drinker, a drug abuser, a criminal or a child, the potential instructor will be disqualified.

In addition to eligibility, the instructor qualification database 208 may also include a measure of suitability for a given instructor-receiver pairing. For example, the referee and the instructor may interview each other for example, the degree of fit, before assigning an instructor to a mentee. The instructor qualification database 208 and the individual success probability database 202 in crisis can also store the results of such interviews. In addition, the mentee may reject an instructor after an instructor-director relationship has been established. In such a case, the instructor qualification database 208 can include a note indicating that the instructor is not suitable for the one of the facilitators. Depending on the content of the note, the instructor may not be considered suitable for any future referee. Depending on the timing of the note and its reasons, the instructor's right to receive any remuneration in the future may be eliminated or adjusted.

The instructor performance database 210 can also be used to store a plurality of instructor records. For example, the instructor performance database 210 can store records relating to how the instructor behaves. One way to assess the performance of the instructor is by comparing the outcome of the mentee with the probability of success of the individual in crisis or the probability of success of the criminal. Individuals or criminals in crisis are more successful than their respective successes, and the instructors are better off. Another way in which system 100 can assess how instructors behave is by including reports from parties. For example, the parent, teacher, or other interested party of the mentee may provide a report on the manner in which the instructor has a positive or negative impact on the mentee. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that other performance metrics can be used to determine the effectiveness of the instructor. Performance metrics can be collected periodically. In some embodiments, if the results are significantly positive or negative, the system provides various reminders and appropriate actions can be taken to repeat or eliminate the reported behavior.

Additionally, the instructor performance database 210 can include a plurality of problem-solution pairs. For example, if an instructor reports that a solution is very effective for one of the mentees in a given situation, then this annotation can be noted in the instructor performance database 210. Alternatively, if an instructor reports that a solution is not very effective for one of the mentees in a given situation, then this can also be noted in the instructor performance database 210. These issues - solution pairing may be useful for other instructor-director relationships.

In some embodiments, system 100 can include an artificial intelligence module for improving the functionality of the criminal success rate database 204, the instructor database 206, and any other database in the system 100. In some embodiments, the artificial intelligence module is also used to select an instructor for a facilitator.

System 100 can also include an oversight committee to review and approve an instructor-director pairing and track how the instructor behaves. The committee can use the information in the instructor performance database 210 to perform the tracking. In addition to tracking the performance of the instructor, the committee may also assign an instructor to a mentee. The assignment may be based, for example, on the success rate of the facilitator, the qualification of the instructor, and the performance of the instructor. In addition, the committee may limit the number of mentors a instructor may have. For example, if an instructor is inexperienced and has not proven to be a good instructor, the committee may initially limit the number of mentors the instructor may have at any given time. If the instructor performs well, the committee may increase the number of mentors the instructor may have. In either case, the number of recipients allowed by each instructor should increase as the instructor demonstrates success and when the facilitator may need less time per week due to its maturity and success with life. In some embodiments, the supervisory committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving the rewards of the instructors.

In certain embodiments, system 100 may draw information about the potential qualifications of the potential instructor and/or their specific qualifications in teaching a particular recipient candidate or a particular type of referee candidate, and The information is electronically or otherwise delivered to an oversight committee that will be responsible for assigning an instructor to approve a particular faculty member. The system 100 can also electronically or otherwise deliver certain aspects of the instructor information to a potential or a potential mentee's parent or guardian, and obtain from the potential mentee about the potential mentee and a particular A response from the instructor's willingness to cooperate.

In some embodiments, system 100 evaluates information or provides information to an oversight committee to assess the probability that a potential instructor will successfully reduce various crisis factors associated with one or more potential mentors. The factors to be analyzed will include the instructor's education, family status, age, non-work interests, work performed, criminal history, health, drug use, leadership, ethnicity, religion, or other personality traits. References to the position of the instructor in the community and the qualification of the instructor from respected personnel may also be important. By tracking the instructor's qualifications and comparing personal attributes and professional attributes with their performance over time, information will be obtained about which potential instructors will guide the most effective future. It may also be useful to correlate these results with the attributes of the instructor's respective mentors. The best instructor for the person X may be quite different from the best instructor for the person Y.

In some embodiments, system 100 electronically tracks the performance of the instructor when guiding his or her supervisor. Such performance may include statistics on the relative relationship of the success of the facilitator to its initial success rate, and may include reports from the mentee and/or his or her parent or teacher or other interested parties. Whether the data should be collected on a weekly or monthly basis or in some other periodic manner will also be affected by the ongoing analysis of the data. It is certainly meaningful to make the frequency higher in the early stages of the relationship, however, the time interval can be extended based on the positive relationship and progress of stability. In some embodiments, data is collected weekly during the first month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, or 6 months of the instructor-director relationship. Based on the progress of the instructor-director relationship, the time interval for data collection is extended to 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, or 6 months. Of course, learning the good and bad aspects of each relationship can be equally important. In some cases, even in the case of particularly challenging situations, even the instructor may need an instructor. If the instructor faces a challenging problem, it is encouraged to seek assistance. The system 100 will provide the instructor with the option of reading the suggested suggestion, contacting a living person for a brief conversation, attending a class related to the question, or requesting an expert to participate in a future referee meeting. In some embodiments, each of the mentors has its own database. In order for each facilitator to get the best results in a timely manner, a large database with one of a wide variety of possible problems and solutions will be critical. Remind each to ensure that progress is progressing properly and that the instructor's behavior or mentee behavior is inappropriate or unsuccessful in any way or when there is evidence that the current instructor/receiver relationship needs to be terminated or modified in some way It is also important for the organization to have a specific database for each facilitator. In some embodiments, system 100 electronically tracks the overall outcome of the teaching process.

The instructor rewards database 212 can be used to store a plurality of instructor records. The instructor records stored in the instructor qualification database 208, in the instructor performance database 210, and in the instructor rewards database 212 can all be identical. System 100 can reward the efforts of the instructor. For example, the instructor can receive a portion of the tax amount of his or her faculty member. In this way, the instructors and even the instructors' families and friends can be rewarded to take full advantage of the financial wealth of their mentors. However, some adjustments can be made to this kind of reward. For example, women usually have lower incomes than men. Therefore, there may be an adjustment factor to correct for this resulting inequality. Alternatively, or in addition, the instructor may be rewarded based on the tutor's household tax. For example, a mentee may become a woman who is a successful but not working mother. The instructor may have played a big role in this success. However, since the woman does not work, she does not incur any taxable income. Therefore, the share of tax revenue based on family income can be a way of properly rewarding the instructor.

The amount of financial incentives offered to the instructor may reflect the initial estimate of the level of crisis faced by the mentee as determined by the following: the crisis factor of the mentee and the historical database accumulated in the computer system Crisis factors are compared and their prospective performance is assessed based on their relative crisis comparisons. The potential crime costs, prison costs, welfare costs, and estimated social costs of certain individuals with their crisis factors are weighed against the positive impact of successful personnel despite the existence of such crisis factors. Depending on the severity of the crisis factor, if the instructor is successful, the share of future income tax payments can be extremely high while still providing a long-term benefit to the community. In some embodiments, the amount of the instructor's award is calculated as one of the following percentages: the personal income tax of the mentee, the family income tax of the mentee, the estimated income tax of the mentee, the mentee It is estimated that the family income tax, the retire's retirement plan investment, and/or the mentor's education plan investment. Tax payments can include federal tax payments, state tax payments, and/or city tax payments.

Other bonuses may also be provided by system 100. Such other bonuses may, for example, be based on specific objectives, such as graduating from college, achieving a specific grade average score, being admitted to a university, avoiding underage pregnancy, avoiding drug use, avoiding gang participation or avoiding crime. Such targets may not generate any taxable income. Therefore, a way to reward the instructor can be a tax deduction. Tax deductions can depend on how well the mentee does in terms of specific goals. This may be done, for example, after the instructor's faculty reaches a certain age and withstands any of these temptations or deducts the instructor's tax bill after some of these goals have been achieved. In some embodiments, a database is constructed to track the performance of the mentee with respect to these key factors and other key factors. In some embodiments, the bonus is provided to the instructor as an income tax deduction, wherein the amount of the income tax deduction is calculated based on the behavior of the subject in crisis, and/or the income tax of the subject in crisis. Investment plans for retirement plans for individuals in crisis, and/or educational programs for those in crisis. In some embodiments, the tax credit is a federal income tax credit, a state income tax credit, a city income tax credit, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the bonus is a direct remuneration to one of the instructors, which may or may not be considered taxable. In some embodiments, the bonus is based on one of the following direct rewards or a point reward: the estimated social cost to the mentee for the mentee over a certain period of time and the predicted social cost of the mentee Compared. Such points may be provided by one or more companies or other entities that desire to support the teaching activities and promote the use of their products and/or services. In some embodiments, the bonus is based on a direct reward or a reward for the following: the estimated social cost of the faculty at the beginning of a time period and the estimated social cost of the faculty at the end of a time period Difference. In some embodiments, system 100 calculates the estimated income tax of the mentee based on the verified information provided by the mentee.

In some embodiments, the system 100 electronically obtains income tax information, retirement plan investment information, and/or education plan investment information from relevant government agencies and/or financial institutions, based on income tax information, retirement plan investment information, and/or Education plan investment information to determine the amount of cash remuneration and/or bonus (in the form of income tax deduction) of the instructor, and from the Supervisory Committee and/or relevant government agencies (eg, IRS, State Tax Department, or City Tax) Department) is approved.

In some embodiments, system 100 processes an amount approved by a government agency for the instructor's remuneration. In some embodiments, system 100 communicates a reward notification to a department, company, or agency responsible for the instructor's remuneration, wherein the notification causes the department, company, or agency to process the instructor's remuneration. In some embodiments, the system 100 further transmits a reminder to one of the instructors for a cash payment to a relevant government agency (eg, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to issue one of the cash payments.

In some embodiments, system 100 will issue a warning to an instructor for an income tax credit to a relevant government agency (eg, the US Internal Revenue Service) to enable the government agency to enter the tax credit into the instructor's tax record. in.

In some embodiments, the system 100 obtains income tax information, retirement plan investment information, and/or education plan investment information from a relevant government agency or financial institution, and determines an amount of cash compensation for the instructor, which is approved by the supervisory committee and notified. A government agency (for example, the US Internal Revenue Service, the State Tax Department, or the City Tax Department) for the approved amount, where the notification causes the relevant government agency to process the instructor’s remuneration and electronically deliver the remuneration to one of the banks designated by the instructor account.

In addition, one of the criminals who will be released from prison or who have been released from prison may have multiple instructors, for example two. For example, one instructor may have cooperated with the mentee while the mentee is in prison and the other instructor may be outside the prison. The two instructors receive different rewards. For example, the instructor in the prison can be rewarded based on the recidivism of the pilot. Instructors outside the prison can be rewarded based on the income tax of the mentee and/or the performance in avoiding social costs (which can also include recidivism).

The initial database of success probabilities and future inventories that are part of the instructor will be important to focus on the work while appropriately motivating the instructor. In some embodiments, system 100 tracks both the mentee and the instructor to determine the success of the relationship and identify key elements of success or failure. Any particular instructor may look good in theory, but only the time and database will be able to determine the true performance of its activities. In the future, both the instructor and the mentee will have the opportunity to learn from the successes and failures of their predecessors, provided that their predecessors are properly documented in the computer system and carefully analyzed.

Guided safety and project supervision

It is essential to ensure that vigilance oversight of this process is carried out normally. When starting on a large scale, care must be taken to deal with the fact that child prostitutes, criminals or simply inefficient instructors may try to get into the system. Thus, in some embodiments, a database and/or an emergency information system is constructed such that any inappropriate behavior can be immediately reported and effectively addressed. A contract with the instructor may include the following provisions: If inappropriate behavior occurs, the right to receive remuneration in the future is eliminated. Similarly, the mentee has the right to interview the instructor and/or to deny the instructor midway if the facilitator feels uncomfortable because the relationship is unsuitable or unhelpful. Maintaining a detailed database of instructor candidates (including reports of the successes and failures of the instructor candidates) will be critical to ensuring that the facilitator is protected and given the greatest chance of success in the future. In some embodiments, the database will be a national database to ensure that the "bad apple" identified in one jurisdiction will not appear in another jurisdiction. Similarly, there is no doubt that some instructors will really come up with brilliant ideas that should be replicated quickly across the country. Collecting and sharing bad and good stories from this database will be extremely valuable.

In some embodiments, another associated database can track the overall instructor review process. A supervising entity can monitor the behavior of the instructor and approve each assignment and continuously review the success of the assignment. It is conceivable that various types of misconduct that may occur under such a bureaucratic system, therefore, tracking various metrics to ensure the best possible outcomes while encouraging the evaluators who are able to stand up to the merits or vice versa will be important of. Having an extensive database that is regularly excavated carefully will help ensure that the process gets the best results. Keeping track of drug use, crime, employment rate, graduation rate, dropout rate, underage pregnancy, and other measures of success and failure will be important in assessing the continuing eligibility of each instructor. In some embodiments, an inexperienced instructor is limited to having only one or two or several mentees until they can establish their qualifications by the success of the mentee.

3 is a flow chart showing a method 300 for implementing system 100 in accordance with an aspect of the present invention. Method 300 can begin at block 302. At block 302, system 100 can collect information about the mentors and instructors as well as other relevant materials. At block 304, system 100 processes the collected data. For example, the collected data can also be used to fill the faculty database 200 and the instructor database 206. In block 304, system 100 can generate a pilot success rate and an instructor summary. After block 304 is complete, method 300 can proceed to block 306 to begin the matching process.

At block 306, the system 100 can match the instructor to the mentee. This matching can be implemented entirely by the system 100, entirely by the supervisory committee described above, or by a combination of the system and the supervisory committee. After block 306 is complete, method 300 can proceed to block 308.

In some embodiments, system 100 includes a matching module that includes software for matching the instructor to the instructor based on a profile of a facilitator and an overview of an instructor. logic. In some embodiments, the profile of the mentee includes the personal information of the mentee (eg, age and gender), the census's crisis profile, the success rate of the mentee, and the label associated with the mentee (eg, Location tags (for example, New York City), language tags (for example, Spanish), and behavior tags (for example, aggression). The instructor profile includes the instructor's personal information, the instructor's work history, and the tags associated with the instructor (eg, location tags (eg, New York City), language tags (eg, Spanish), and experience tags (eg, dealing with aggression) experience)). The matching module can analyze the tags associated with the profile of the facilitator and the profile of the instructor and determine the best match based on a matching algorithm. In some embodiments, system 100 includes an artificial intelligence module to improve the functionality of various databases and the instructor-receiver matching process.

At block 308, system 100 can track the success of each instructor-director relationship. System 100 can track the success of such relationships as described above with reference to Figure 2. After block 308 is complete, method 300 can proceed to block 310.

At block 310, the system 100 can reward the instructor based on the success of the instructor-director relationship. System 100 can measure the success of the relationship as described above with reference to Figure 2. After block 310 is completed (which may take years or even decades), method 300 may end.

Each of the processes, methods, and algorithms described in the preceding sections can be implemented by coded instructions embodied in one or more computer systems or computer processors, and by the coded instructions. Automate partially or partially. These processes and algorithms may be implemented partially or completely in application specific circuitry.

The various features and processes described above can be used independently of one another or can be combined in various ways. All possible combinations and sub-combinations are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Additionally, in some embodiments, certain method blocks or process blocks may be omitted. The methods and processes described herein are not limited to any particular order, and the blocks or states associated with the methods and processes may be performed in other suitable sequences. For example, the blocks or states may be performed in an order other than the order specifically disclosed, or a plurality of blocks or states may be combined in a single block or state. Each example block or state may be executed continuously, in parallel, or in some other manner. Blocks or states may be added or removed for the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The example systems and components described herein can be configured in a manner different than that described. For example, elements may be added, removed, or rearranged as compared to the disclosed exemplary embodiments.

Unless otherwise specifically stated or otherwise understood within the context of use, conditional language (eg, "can, could, might or may, and others" is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include certain features, The elements and/or steps, while other embodiments do not include certain features, elements, and/or steps. Therefore, such conditional language is not intended to suggest that the features, elements, and/or steps are in any way. It is necessary for a plurality of embodiments, or one or more embodiments, to include whether the user includes or will perform such features, elements, and/or in any particular embodiment with or without input or prompting. The logic of the steps.

The above description is intended to teach those skilled in the art how to practice the subject matter of the present application, and is not intended to detail all those obvious modifications and variations of the present application. After reading this description, the skilled artisan will understand. These retouching and changes. However, all such obvious modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the present application as defined by the following claims. The various aspects and embodiments are intended to cover the various components and steps in any order that effectively meet the intended objectives, unless the context specifically indicates the opposite.

Claims (24)

 A method for processing information to provide a mentoring service to a person in crisis, comprising the steps of: receiving, by one of the application interfaces on one or more computer processors, a user interface A personal profile of a person in a crisis, wherein the personal profile includes a person profile, a crisis profile, and a plurality of menee matching tags, the crisis profile including a plurality of crisis factors; Or the plurality of computer processors assign a crisis point value to each of the crisis factors based on a severity level of the crisis factor of the object and a risk point matrix stored on a memory device, the memory device Accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database that reflects the crisis of other objects and whether the other objects are subsequently successful or failed Estimating a lifetime social cost comparison by the one or more computer processors by the one or more computer processors Determining the total crisis point value of one of the objects in crisis; if the total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined threshold, accepting the object in crisis as a mentee candidate; One or more computer processors search for a mentor candidate database comprising a plurality of instructor profiles, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; One or more computer processors assign at least one instructor candidate to the subject candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, Wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; the assigned at least one instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee for approval; in the establishment of a mentor-mentee relationship Thereafter, receiving, by the user interface of the application, a progress report of the object in crisis; Comparing the progress of the object in crisis with the success rate of the in-crisis individual stored in a memory device by the one or more computer processors, or the success rate of the prior criminal, the memory device may be Or access by a plurality of computer processors; obtained by the one or more computer processors: (1) an income tax record of the object in crisis from a relevant government agency, and (2) a crisis from a relevant financial institution Retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the object, or (3) if the object in crisis is successfully taught, the future income tax and future retirement plan investment and/or future education plan investment of the object a forecast; a financial incentive for the one of the instructors by the one or more computer processors based on: a result of the comparing step; an income tax record of the subject in crisis; Retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the target in crisis; or if the person in crisis is successfully taught, Such forecast of future income tax and future retirement plan investment and/or future education plan investment; and expected lifetime social cost; approval of the amount of the financial incentive from the supervisory committee; and one of the approved amounts A notice is sent to the relevant government agency.    The method of claim 1, wherein the financial reward is provided to the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan in the form of a reward, wherein the amount of the cash reward is calculated as one of the following percentages: The income tax, the retirement plan investment, and/or the education plan investment of the object in the crisis, and the notice causes the relevant government agency to issue one of the approved amounts.    The method of claim 2, wherein the notification is subject to review and approval by the relevant government agency, and wherein the relevant government agency issues one of the amounts approved by the relevant government agency.    The method of claim 3, wherein the notification causes the relevant government agency to electronically deposit the approved amount into a bank account designated by the instructor.    The method of claim 1, wherein the financial reward is provided in the form of: (1) an income tax credit, or (2) an investment in the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan, and wherein the notice To cause the relevant government agency to: (1) issue to the instructor a notice of an income tax credit for one of the approved amounts and electronically enter the tax record on the instructor, or (2) The instructor issues a notice of one of the amounts approved for the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan investment and electronically transfers the funds to the instructor's retirement plan and/or educational program.    The method of claim 5, wherein the notification is subject to review and approval by the relevant government agency and/or the supervisory committee.    The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: obtaining, by the one or more computer processors, a database stored on a memory device about how to reduce one of the crisis factors or Information on the associated crisis and the electronic delivery of the information to the supervisory committee and/or one of the instructors approved by the supervisory committee by the one or more computer processors.    The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: obtaining, by the one or more computer processors, a database stored on a memory device about how to reduce one of the crisis factors or Information relating to a plurality of associated crises, and electronically delivering an alert to the instructor to the wireless device on the wireless communication channel by the one or more computer processors to one of the wireless devices associated with the instructor, wherein The reminder activates an application on the wireless device to cause the wireless device to connect to the one or more computer processors via the Internet and download the information.    The method of claim 1, wherein the crisis factors comprise one or more of a factor selected from the group consisting of age, sex, race, weight, height, work history, traffic violation history, and alcohol consumption. History of drug abuse, personal medical history, school performance, school attendance history, school behavior, extracurricular activities, gang participation, personality assessment, evaluation of siblings and/or parents and/or guardians, probability of dropping out of school , probability of pregnancy, probability of crime, probability of illicit drug use, work history, probability of habitual unemployment, and probability of returning to prison.    The method of claim 1, wherein the crisis point matrix is generated using ontology related artificial intelligence.    A system for providing teaching services to a person in crisis, comprising: one or more computer processors; and one or more tangible, non-transitory computer readable media receivable by the one or more computer processors Taking the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media, when executed by the one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to execute the following instructions: by the one or more A user interface executing one of the applications on the computer processor receives a crisis profile of one of the objects in crisis, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors and an expected lifetime social cost of the object in crisis; Assigning a crisis point value to each of the one or more computer processors based on a severity level of the object's crisis factor and an expected lifetime social cost of the object and a crisis point matrix stored on a memory device a crisis factor, the memory device being accessible by the one or more computer processors, wherein the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a large database, the large Type database reflects the crisis of other objects and the subsequent success or failure of these other objects and the expected lifetime social cost; the one or more computer processors determine the crisis by the one or more computer processors One of the objects in the total crisis point value; if the total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined threshold, accepting the object in crisis as a receiver candidate; by the one or more computer processor pairs A searcher candidate database comprising a plurality of instructor profiles, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; assigning at least one instructor candidate by the one or more computer processors Giving the recipient candidate, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; The assigned at least one instructor candidate is submitted to an oversight committee for approval; an instructor-recipient is established Receiving, by the user interface of the application, a progress report of the object in crisis; and the one or more computer processors progressing and storing the object in crisis in a memory device Comparing the progress achieved by other individuals in crisis with the probability of success or the progress of the prior criminal and the probability of success, the memory device can be accessed by the one or more computer processors; by the one or more computers The processor obtains: (1) an income tax record of the person in crisis from the relevant government agency, and/or (2) retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment from the relevant financial institution in the crisis. Information; determining, by the one or more computer processors, a financial reward for one of the instructors based on: a result of the comparing step, an income tax record of the subject in crisis, and a retirement plan investment of the subject in crisis Information and/or education plan investment information, and expected lifetime social costs; approval from the supervisory committee for the amount of the financial incentive; And transmitting a notice of one of the approved amounts to the relevant government agency.    The system of claim 11, wherein the financial reward is provided to the instructor in the form of a cash reward, wherein the amount of the cash reward is calculated as one of the following percentages: (1) the object in crisis Income tax, and/or (2) the target of the crisis, the investment in the retirement plan and/or education plan of the target in crisis, and/or (3) the object in crisis is avoiding the meeting The negative consequences of social costs and the performance of events.    The system of claim 11, wherein the notification is subject to review and approval by the relevant government agency, and wherein the relevant government agency issues one of the amounts approved by the relevant government agency.    The system of claim 13, wherein the notification causes the relevant government agency to electronically deposit the approved amount into a bank account designated by the instructor.    The system of claim 11, wherein the financial reward is provided in the form of an investment in one of the instructor's retirement plan and/or educational program, and wherein the notification causes the relevant government agency to issue the instructor to the instructor One of the amounts approved by the retirement plan and/or education plan investment is notified and the investment is electronically transferred to the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan.    The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media comprises instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the following steps: And utilizing the one or more computer processors to retrieve information about how to reduce a crisis associated with one or more of the crisis factors from a database stored on a memory device, and by using the one The plurality of computer processors electronically deliver the information to the supervisory committee and/or one of the instructors approved by the supervisory committee and/or the parent or guardian of the director.    The system of claim 16 wherein the information is delivered to a wireless device associated with the instructor on a wireless communication channel.    The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more tangible non-transitory computer readable media comprises instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the following steps: And utilizing the one or more computer processors to retrieve information about how to reduce a crisis associated with one or more of the crisis factors from a database stored on a memory device, and by using the one Or the plurality of computer processors electronically deliver a reminder to the instructor to the wireless device associated with the instructor on a wireless communication channel, wherein the alert activates an application on the wireless device to cause the wireless device to pass the wireless device via the wireless device The internet is connected to the one or more computer processors and the information is downloaded.    The system of claim 11, wherein the at least one instructor candidate is selected using an artificial intelligence process implemented by an artificial intelligence module.    A tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising: when executed by a computer processor, causing the processor to execute an instruction to receive a crisis regarding a crisis object by a user interface on a computer An overview, wherein the crisis profile includes a plurality of crisis factors; assigning a crisis point value to each of the crisis points based on a severity level of the object's crisis factor and a crisis point matrix stored on a memory device by a computer processor a crisis factor, the memory device being accessible by the computer processor, wherein the crisis point matrix is determined by evaluating a crisis database that reflects the crisis of other objects and whether the other objects are subsequently successful or not a comparison of the failure and the estimated lifetime social cost; the computer processor determines, by the one or more computer processors, a total crisis point value of the object in crisis; if the total crisis point value satisfies a predetermined Limit, accept the object in crisis as a candidate for the pilot; the computer processor pair contains a plurality of instructor profiles One of the instructor candidate databases for searching, wherein each of the instructor profiles includes a person profile, a teaching experience, and a plurality of instructor matching tags; wherein the computer processor assigns at least one instructor candidate to the subject candidate, wherein The at least one instructor candidate is selected based on a match between the referee matching tags and one of the instructor matching tags, wherein the matching is performed using a matching algorithm; the at least one instructor candidate to be assigned Submitted to an oversight committee for approval; after establishing an instructor-receiver relationship, the user interface of the application receives a progress report of the object in crisis; the computer processor is The progress of the object in the crisis is compared with the probability of success of the in-crisis individual stored on a memory device or the success rate of the prior criminal, the memory device being accessible by the computer processor; obtained by the computer processor : (1) Income tax records of the person in crisis from the relevant government agency, and / (2) retirement plan investment information and/or education plan investment information of the crisis-related object from the relevant financial institution; the financial reward for one of the instructors is determined by the one or more computer processors based on the following: The result of the comparison step, the income tax record of the person in crisis, the retirement plan investment information of the target in crisis, and/or the investment plan information of the education plan, and the expected lifetime social cost; the computer processor is determined based on the following Financial reward for one of the instructors: the outcome of the comparison step, and the income tax record of the person in crisis, and the estimated lifetime social cost; obtaining approval from the supervisory committee for the amount of the financial incentive; A notice of the approved amount is transmitted to the relevant government agency, wherein the financial reward is provided to the instructor in the form of a cash remuneration, wherein the amount of the cash remuneration is calculated as one of the following percentages: Income tax on the object in the event, the annual retirement plan of the person in crisis Investing in investment information and/or educational plan investments, or the amount of cash remuneration reflects a remuneration based on the fact that the mentee has reached one or more milestones or avoided an event that would result in social costs, and wherein the notification resulted in the relevant government The agency issues one of the amounts approved by the agency.    The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 20, wherein the financial reward is provided in the form of an income tax deduction of the instructor or an investment in one of the instructor's retirement plan and/or educational program, and Wherein the notice causes the relevant government agency to issue a notice to the instructor regarding the income tax credit or one of the amount approved for the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan investment, and electronically input the income tax credit Transfer the investment to the instructor's retirement plan and/or education plan electronically on the instructor's tax record.    The tangible non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 20, further comprising instructions for causing the computer processor to perform the following steps when executed by the computer processor: self-storing by the one or more computer processors Retrieving information about how to reduce a crisis associated with one or more of the crisis factors in a database on a memory device, and by using the computer processor to the instructor on a wireless communication channel Electronically delivering a reminder to one of the wireless devices associated with the instructor, wherein the alert activates an application on the wireless device to cause the wireless device to connect to the computer processor via the Internet and download the information.    The tangible non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 20, further comprising instructions for causing the computer processor to execute a process when executed by the computer processor, the process using ontology-related artificial intelligence to improve the crisis The function of the database.    The tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 20, wherein the financial reward is provided in the form of a point provided to the instructor, wherein the amount of the reward is as one of the following percentages Calculated: (1) the income tax of the person in crisis, and/or (2) the investment in the crisis plan and/or the education plan of the target in crisis, and/or ( 3) The target of the crisis is avoiding the negative consequences and events that will cause social costs.