TW201411372A - Multi-file checking system and method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

A multi-file checking system and method thereof is disclosed to solve the problem without spell-checking for multi-file. By analyzing format of the multi-file and loading decoding rule, and then comparing content of the multi-file and words for generating a spelling report. The mechanism is to improve the efficiency and convenience of spell-checking.

Description

Multi-file inspection system and method thereof

A file inspection system and method thereof, in particular, a multi-file inspection system and method for spell checking multiple files at the same time.

In recent years, with the rapid development of information technology and the rise of environmental awareness, the paper documents have gradually become electronic. Therefore, various software processing software for processing electronic documents (hereinafter referred to as documents) has sprung up.

In general, the basic function of the word processing software is to provide the user with the ability to edit the text, and even to process the chart or simple spreadsheet. However, with the development of software processing software, people can no longer meet the basic functions provided by the software processing software. Therefore, how to increase the function of the software processing software has become an urgent problem for various manufacturers.

In view of this, some manufacturers have proposed a word processing software with a spell check function, so that when the user performs text editing, the user can simultaneously prompt the user whether the entered vocabulary is misspelled to reduce the possibility of misspelling. However, since the word processing software can only perform spell checking on the currently opened file, there is a problem that it is impossible to perform spell checking on multiple files at the same time. On the other hand, when multiple files have different formats, because the file formats supported by various word processing software are different, it is also easy to cause spell checking errors due to compatibility, and if the file is actually opened, it is not only cost effective. In addition, it is more inconvenient for the user.

In summary, it can be seen that there has been a problem in the prior art that it is impossible to perform spell checking on multiple files at the same time, and therefore it is necessary to propose an improved technical means to solve this problem.

In view of the problems of the prior art. The present invention discloses a multi-file inspection system and method thereof.

The multi-file inspection system disclosed in the present invention comprises: a spelling database, a loading module, an analysis module and an inspection module. The spelling database is used to store the vocabulary; the loading module is used to load the file file; the analysis module is used to analyze and record the format of the file file in the analysis result; and the checking module loads the corresponding decoding rule according to the analysis result. And decoding the corresponding file file through the decoding rule and comparing with the vocabulary to generate and display the spelling report.

As for the multi-file inspection method of the present invention, the steps include: creating a vocabulary in the spelling data database; loading the file file; analyzing and recording the format of the file file in the analysis result; loading the corresponding decoding rule according to the analysis result, and decoding The rules decode the corresponding file file and compare it with the vocabulary to generate and display the spelling report.

The system and method disclosed in the present invention are as above, and the difference from the prior art is that the present invention compares the decoded file content with the vocabulary by analyzing the format of each file and respectively loading the corresponding decoding rule to decode the file. And generate a spelling report.

Through the above technical means, the present invention can achieve the technical effect of improving the efficiency and convenience of spelling correction.

The embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings and embodiments, so that the application of the technical means to solve the technical problems and achieve the technical effects can be fully understood and implemented.

First, before describing the embodiment in detail, the self-defined nouns of the multi-file inspection system and the method thereof according to the present invention are described. The file according to the present invention exists in the form of a computer file, so it can be called a file. File, and this file file has a file for identification The name of the auxiliary file, such as: "doc", "pdf", "html", "ppt", ..., etc., in order to cooperate with the processing software that specializes in the processing of the file name for further paper processing. . The encoding rule and the decoding rule are processes for encoding and decoding files having different file names. For example, the decoding rule corresponding to the "doc" file name can decode the file file with the file name "doc" to display the text content therein; the decoding rule corresponding to the "pdf" file name can be used for the file name. Decode the file file of "pdf" and display the text content thereof... and so on. Otherwise, the encoding rule is like the decoding rule, the difference is only that the encoding rule is used for encoding, and the decoding rule is used for The encoded file is decoded, so the encoding rules are not described here. In general, different sub-file names correspond to different encoding rules and decoding rules, and the corresponding encoding rules and decoding rules can be correspondingly encoded/decoded. .

Next, prior to describing an embodiment of the present invention, the multi-document inspection system and method thereof of the present invention will be further described with reference to the drawings. Please refer to "FIG. 1", which is a multi-file inspection system of the present invention. The block diagram includes: a spelling database 101, a loading module 102, an analysis module 103, and an inspection module 104. The spelling database 101 is used to store vocabulary, and the vocabulary includes words in various languages, such as Chinese, English, French, ..., and programming languages, such as: c, java, html, ...and at least one of the keywords. In addition, the spelling database 101 may further include a grammar rule for analyzing whether the grammar of the text content and the syntax of the programming language are at least one of the spelling errors, and the grammar rule may be updated through the network or the file due to the update thereof. The method is a conventional technique, so it will not be repeated here.

The loading module 102 is configured to load a file file, and the format of the file file includes at least a file file format (for example, the file name is "doc", "ppt", ..., etc.), and the text format is (Example: the file name is "txt"), portable file format (for example: the file name is "pdf" "), the super-text markup language format (for example: the extension file name "html") and the open file format (for example: the extension file name "odf", "oxml", ..., etc.) Since the file file has been explained in the previous custom nouns, it will not be repeated here.

The analysis module 103 is configured to analyze and record the format of the file file in the analysis result, and the analysis manner can be determined according to the file structure of the file file or directly according to the file name of the file file. Generally speaking, the file structure of the file file has a field for recording the file format. Therefore, in actual implementation, the value of the field can be determined by judging the value of the field (for example, the string value is "word file"). Format, and record the format in the analysis results; and directly determine the format of the file file according to the file name (for example: "doc"), it is easy to generate errors due to misjudgment, because the file name is easily falsified, However, it is still a simple way to judge the format. Similarly, after judging the format, the result of the judgment is recorded in the analysis result.

The checking module 104 loads the corresponding decoding rule according to the analysis result, and after decoding the corresponding file file through the loaded decoding rule, the text content in the text file and all the words in the spelling database 101 are made. The comparison is used to generate and display a spelling report. For example, the analysis result is recorded as a “word file”, and the checking module 104 loads the decoding rule of the “word file” according to the analysis result to decode the file file. Since the text content of the file file is obtained after decoding, for example, the word content has "good" and "goood" words, and then the checking module 104 then performs the text content and all the words in the spelling database 101. The comparison is performed, and the text content that does not match the comparison is displayed as a spelling report. In this example, the word “goood” is a typo, so it does not exist in the spelling database 101, so after the comparison, The word "goood" does not match the match and is recorded in the spelling report. In addition, the above spelling report record can record the comparison results of multiple file files, and includes the matching words and ratios. Statistics on at least one of the inconsistent words, and can be displayed in the form of graphics and tables. In actual implementation, the check module 104 can perform a customized spell check by using a preset spell check rule, and the spell check rule can record the spell check mode, for example, only the check start is The vocabulary of the letter "b" is even a vocabulary that ignores checking.

As described above, the multi-file inspection system may further include: a receiving module 105, a decoding module 106, and a revision module 107. The receiving module 105 is configured to receive the selection condition and the modified text, and the selection condition and the modified text can be input by pressing a function key or a cursor selection manner, respectively, for selecting a file file to be edited, and selecting or Enter the correct vocabulary to correct it.

The decoding module 106 is configured to select one of the loaded file files according to the selection condition, and display the text content of the file file after being decoded by the decoding rule corresponding to the selected file file. In particular, the difference between the decoding module 106 and the inspection module 104 is that the decoding module 106 displays the decoded text content, and the inspection module 104 is the decoded text content and the spelling database. All the words in 101 are compared, and only the spelling reports generated based on the comparison results are displayed.

The revision module 107 edits the text content of the file file according to the revised text, and after the editing is completed, encodes and writes the file file through the encoding rule corresponding to the format of the file file. As can be seen from the foregoing description, file files have different encoding formats according to different file names. Therefore, when writing file files, the decoded and revised text content must first be transmitted through the corresponding encoding rules. Write the file and then write it to the file.

As shown in "Fig. 2", "Fig. 2" is a flowchart of the multi-file checking method of the present invention, the steps of which include: creating a vocabulary in the spelling database (step 201); loading the file file (step Step 202); analyzing and recording the format of the file file in the analysis result (step 203); loading the corresponding decoding rule according to the analysis result, and decoding the corresponding file file through the decoding rule and comparing with the vocabulary to generate A spelling report is displayed (step 204). Through the above steps, the format of each file can be analyzed and the corresponding decoding rules are respectively loaded to decode the file, and the decoded file content is compared with the vocabulary and a spelling report is generated.

In addition, the multi-file checking method may further include: receiving a selection condition and correcting the text (step 205); selecting one of the file files according to the selection condition, and displaying the file file after decoding by the decoding rule corresponding to the file file The text content (step 206); editing the text content of the file file according to the modified text, and after the editing is completed, encoding and writing the file file through the encoding rule corresponding to the format of the file file (step 207). By the above steps, after the spelling report is generated, one of the loaded file files is selected for vocabulary revision and storage.

The following description will be made by way of example with reference to "3rd" to "6th". Please refer to "3rd" to "5th", which is a schematic diagram of multi-file inspection using the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the inspection window 300, the loading component 301, the loading display block 302, the spell checking component 303, the report output component 304, the spelling report display block 305, the previous vocabulary component 306, The next vocabulary component 307, the modified text selection block 308, the replacement vocabulary component 309, and all of the recovery components 310, the form and inclusion of the inspection window 300 are not limited thereto.

When the user wants to perform a spell check on multiple files, the inspection window 300 can be executed and the loading component 301 can be clicked to generate a selection dialog (not shown) to provide the user with the choice and loading of the spell check. File files, for example: Select to load file files as "a.htm" and "b.doc". Then, the loading module 102 loads the selected file file, and analyzes and records the format of the file file through the analysis module 103 to analyze the result. In fact, according to the file structure or the auxiliary file name of "a.htm" and "b.doc", the format of the two files is "html file" and "word file" respectively, so the analysis result records the file file. The format of a.htm" is "html file", and the format of file file "b.doc" is "word file". It should be noted that the present invention does not limit the format recorded by the analysis result, that is, as long as the file file and the corresponding format can be known, the spirit of the present invention can be omitted. For example, the analysis result can also be Values represent different formats, for example: the value "1" stands for "html file" and the value "2" stands for "word file".

As shown in Figure 4, when the analysis module 103 analyzes and records the format of the file file and analyzes the result, the related information of the file file to be loaded, such as the file name, type and size, can also be displayed. Loaded into display block 302. Then, when the user clicks on the spell check component 303, the check module 104 loads the corresponding decoding rule according to the analysis result (for example, the decoding rule of the loading process "html file" and the decoding rule of processing the "word file"). And decoding the corresponding file file through the loaded decoding rule, and comparing with all the words in the spelling database 101 to generate and display a spelling report. For example, the checking module 104 The decoding rule for processing the "html file" is used to decode the file file "a.htm", and the decoding rule for loading the "word file" is used to decode the file file "b.doc" and compare The words "boook" and "goood" which are inconsistent with the post-recording are recorded in the spelling report, and the spelling report can be displayed in the spelling report display block 305 as shown in "Fig. 5" by clicking the report output component 304. This spelling report can also record the total number of words that do not match the matching in each file file.

Next, please refer to "Figure 6", "Figure 6" is a schematic diagram of multi-file revision using the present invention. As mentioned earlier, the present invention can perform multi-file checking to generate spellings. In addition, after the spelling report is generated, one of the loaded file files is selected for vocabulary revision and storage. Therefore, the revision will be explained below, and the flow of the steps before the spelling report is generated will not be repeated.

When the user wants to revise the file file that has been spell-checked, a selection condition can be generated by pressing a function key to select a file file that has been loaded. For example, the numeric key "1" of the keyboard can be pressed. Load the first file file; press the number key "2" on the keyboard to load the second file file... and so on, and so on. After the generated selection condition (for example, the number key "2") is received by the receiving module 105, the decoding module 106 loads the selected file file according to the selection condition (for example, the file file "b.doc"). And after decoding by the decoding rule corresponding to the file file (for example, the decoding rule for processing the "word file"), the original spelling report display block 305 can be switched to the editing block as shown in "Fig. 6". 350, used to display the text content of this file file. At this time, the user can input the corrected text in the editing block 350, and after receiving the received text through the receiving module 105, the revision module 107 edits the text content of the text file according to the input corrected text, and after editing, Encoding and writing to the file file (for example, file file "b.doc") through the encoding rules corresponding to the format of the file file, thus completing the revision of the file file.

In addition, the editing block 350 can be further marked with a conspicuous color according to the inconsistent vocabulary recorded in the spelling report, for example, adding a red bottom line (not shown) to the first wrong vocabulary 351 and the first The second error vocabulary 352, so that the user can quickly know the source of the misspelled vocabulary and edit it to complete the revision. In actual implementation, the current vocabulary component 306 and the next vocabulary component 307 can also be used to adjust the current desire. The revised vocabulary, for example, assumes that the current vocabulary to be corrected is the first erroneous vocabulary 351. When the vocabulary component 307 is selected, the vocabulary to be corrected is adjusted to The second erroneous vocabulary 352, even when the vocabulary to be corrected is the first erroneous vocabulary 351, the similar vocabulary similar to the first erroneous vocabulary 351 (for example: book, booker, and bookie) can be displayed in the modified text selection block 308. Used to provide a reference for the user to correct.

In addition to the above reference as a correction, one of the listed similar words may be selected in the modified text selection block 308, and the currently modified word may be replaced by clicking the replacement vocabulary element 309, for example, assuming When the current vocabulary to be corrected is the first erroneous vocabulary 351, when the user selects the similar vocabulary as "book" in the modified text selection block 308, and clicks the replacement vocabulary element 309, the first erroneous vocabulary 351 will be wrong. Replace "boook" with the correct "book". If the user wants to cancel the replacement, all of the restoration elements 310 can be clicked to cancel all replacements. In particular, the judgment of the similar vocabulary is generated by performing a fuzzy comparison between the vocabulary to be corrected and all the vocabulary in the spelling database 101. Since this method is a conventional technique, it is not described here. .

In summary, it can be seen that the difference between the present invention and the prior art is that by analyzing the format of each file and separately loading the corresponding decoding rules for file decoding, the file content after the decoded code is compared with the vocabulary and the spelling is generated. The technical means of the report can solve the problem that the prior art cannot perform spell check on multiple files at the same time by using a technical means, thereby achieving the technical effect of improving the efficiency and convenience of the spell check.

While the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the above description is not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Any changes in the form and details of the embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is to be determined by the scope of the appended claims.

101‧‧‧Spelling database

102‧‧‧Loading module

103‧‧‧Analysis module

104‧‧‧Check module

105‧‧‧ receiving module

106‧‧‧Decoding module

107‧‧‧Modification module

300‧‧‧Check window

301‧‧‧Loading components

302‧‧‧Load display block

303‧‧‧Spell check component

304‧‧‧Report output component

305‧‧‧Spelling report display block

306‧‧‧Previous vocabulary components

307‧‧‧ vocabulary components

308‧‧‧Revised text selection block

309‧‧‧Replacement of vocabulary components

310‧‧‧All recovery components

350‧‧‧Editing block

351‧‧‧First wrong vocabulary

352‧‧‧ second wrong vocabulary

Step 201‧‧‧Create at least one vocabulary in a spelling database

Step 202‧‧‧ Load at least one file file

Step 203‧‧‧ Analyze and record the format of the file file in an analysis result

Step 204‧‧‧ loading corresponding at least one decoding rule according to the analysis result, and decoding the corresponding file file through the decoding rule, and comparing with the vocabulary to generate and display a spelling report

Step 205‧‧‧ Receive a selection condition and a correction text

Step 206‧‧‧ select one of the file files according to the selection condition, and display the text content of the file file after decoding by the decoding rule corresponding to the file file

Step 207‧‧‧ edit the text content of the file file according to the modified text, and after the editing is completed, encode and write the file file through an encoding rule corresponding to the format of the file file

Figure 1 is a block diagram of a multi-file inspection system of the present invention.

Figure 2 is a flow chart of the multi-file checking method of the present invention.

Figures 3 through 5 are schematic views of multi-file inspection using the present invention.

Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of multi-document revision using the present invention.

101‧‧‧Spelling database

102‧‧‧Loading module

103‧‧‧Analysis module

104‧‧‧Check module

105‧‧‧ receiving module

106‧‧‧Decoding module

107‧‧‧Modification module

Claims (10)

A multi-file inspection system includes: a spelling database for storing at least one vocabulary; a loading module for loading at least one file file; and an analysis module for analyzing and recording the file file The format is an analysis result; and an inspection module loads the corresponding at least one decoding rule according to the analysis result, and decodes the corresponding file file through the decoding rule, and compares the vocabulary with the vocabulary. Used to generate and display a spelling report. The multi-document inspection system of claim 1, wherein the system further comprises: a receiving module for receiving a selection condition and a modified text; and a decoding module for selecting the selection according to the selection condition Descripting one of the file files, and displaying the text content of the file file after decoding by the decoding rule corresponding to the file file; and a revision module, editing the text content of the file file according to the modified text, and After the editing is completed, the encoding file is encoded and written by an encoding rule corresponding to the format of the file file. The multi-document inspection system of claim 1, wherein the spelling database further comprises storing at least one grammar rule, the grammar rule being updated through a network or a file, the vocabulary being a word in each language and At least one of the keywords of the programming language, the file file format includes at least one of a document file format, a plain text format, a portable file format, a hypertext markup language format, and an open file format. The multi-file inspection system of claim 2, wherein the encoding rule and the decoding rule are based on processing different formats for being able to correctly read and write the file file. The multi-document inspection system of claim 1, wherein the spelling report records a comparison result of each of the file archives, and includes at least one of the vocabulary that matches the vocabulary and the collocation that does not match the comparison. registration. A multi-file checking method, the method comprising: establishing at least one vocabulary in a spelling database; loading at least one file file; analyzing and recording the format of the file file in an analysis result; and loading the corresponding result according to the analysis result At least one decoding rule, and decoding the corresponding file file through the decoding rule, and comparing the vocabulary to generate and display a spelling report. The multi-document inspection method of claim 6, wherein the method further comprises: receiving a selection condition and a correction text; selecting one of the file files according to the selection condition, and transmitting the file file corresponding to the file file After the decoding rule is decoded, the text content of the file file is displayed; and the text content of the file file is edited according to the modified text, and after editing, encoding is performed by an encoding rule corresponding to the format of the file file and Write to the file archive. The multi-file inspection method of claim 6, wherein the spelling database further comprises storing at least one grammar rule, the grammar rule is transmitted through a network or a file. The file is updated, and the vocabulary is at least one of a word of a national language and a keyword of a programming language, and the format of the file file includes at least a document file format, a plain text format, a portable file format, and a hypertext markup language format. And one of the open file formats. The multi-file inspection method of claim 7, wherein the encoding rule and the decoding rule are based on processing different formats for being able to correctly read and write the file file. The multi-document inspection method of claim 6, wherein the spelling report records a comparison result of each of the file archives, and includes at least one of the vocabulary that matches the vocabulary and the collocation that does not match the comparison. registration.