TW200534147A - The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties - Google Patents
The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TW200534147A TW200534147A TW94122618A TW94122618A TW200534147A TW 200534147 A TW200534147 A TW 200534147A TW 94122618 A TW94122618 A TW 94122618A TW 94122618 A TW94122618 A TW 94122618A TW 200534147 A TW200534147 A TW 200534147A
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- value
- quality
- parameters
- sequence
- factors
- Prior art date
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
200534147 0 九、發明說明: 【發明所屬之技術領域】 本發明係與各式產業製程改良有關,泛指產業界束手無策 且參數繁雜而難以判斷取捨的製程方面。尤其針對在考慮製程 參數間存在交互作用下,如何能有效找出影響製程的主要參數 ,同時求得具多重品質特性的製程參數組合最適化方法。 【先前技術】 針對改善產品品質,業界為對於製程參數大都採用過去實 際操作累積的經驗或嘗試錯誤的方式來作為加工時的參考,而 ♦ 多數加工機製造廠則是只提供判斷系統或工具書幫助製造者 依加工需求選擇加工條件或製程規劃,其目的為滿足加工需求 下,選擇較佳的參數組合控制方式。近年來學術界則是著重於 建立符合多重品質特性的演算法及利用各種方法在解決加工 製程最佳化的探討,其中較早期的文獻有(Osyczka et al., 1982)提出利用多目標決策(multi-criteria)最佳化方法改善 | 多品質特性的問題。(Lin et al.,2000)提出針對多品質特 性問題,結合田口方法與模糊理論分析出最適的參數組合。綜 合上述之文獻雖結合多種方法在改善品質特性問題上,但同樣 缺乏影響製程主要參數選取的依據。同時在實驗過程中,每篇 論文只單純考慮品質特性卻忽略了因子間存在著交互作用關 係,以致於最後所得之結果不儘相同,且無法有效應用在業界 實務上。所以有效的分析出製程主要參數與考慮因子間交互作 用關係,才能確實改善品質的問題。 6 200534147 資料挖掘(Data Mining)中粗集合理論(pawlak,丨⑽幻主 要應用於不確定或不精確的資料作分析,主要協助決策人員針 對一大型資料庫,運用分類與屬性化簡的方法,使決策人員能 快速找出問題的來源的最小決策演算法。其相關文獻研究如 (Kusiak and Kurasek,2001)利用粗集合理論針對印刷電路 在焊接過程中產生錫球現象的因素,找出發生問題的原因。 (SriniVasan and Moon,1999)針斟眾多品質特性提出一群 聚演算法,湘平均鏈結法作為群聚法則,只要·績效有影 響之產品特性皆在演算法中被列人群聚之依據。(_含等, HU對半導體製程問題,利料策樹分析,找出影^站 及通過該機台_,藉此縮小製程㈣的來源。 =星4,觸侧氏祕及粗集合理論,針對化學製品 ^過程中,找㈣響製㈣各個屬性及可能值的分類,並以 貝氏網路找出對每種條件產生機率值。 本發明為有效從眾多製程參數中,分析出影響 的控制參數,而利用粗集合理論中的可辨‘陣法 (D1SCernibllity matrix),此法主要目的為針對於一資訊系 統中所有屬性(參數)集合進行屬性化簡, 、貝β '、 過程是將資料 庫中所有有關屬性(參數)區分的資料都置入一個矩陣中,再透 過邏輯運算後,得到該資料庫内的核心、(咖_ + 化 (reducts)屬性。 S h 田口方法其主要是以發展低成本且具有穩健性的產口為 目的’同時重視產品及製㈣計之最佳化。以往;^田口 ^法 的文獻研究或實務應用中,大都著重於探討單特性之製 7 200534147 1 # 程最佳化的處理,然而產品之製程品質特性往往並非唯一,若 只尋求單一品質特性之製程最佳化,除了可能無法達到製程的 真正需求,同時也會損失許多提高產品品質特性及降低成本的 機會。如早期的(Phadke,1989)將田口方法應用於超大型積體 電路之複晶矽沉積製程中,倘若不同的品質特性之間,最佳化 因子水準選擇有衝突時,則利用工程上相關經驗或知識作判斷 ,以決定出整體之最佳因子水準組合。此法需仰賴工程師較主 觀的相關知識及經驗,雖然分析簡易,但卻無明確的判斷準則 ^ ,亦使得工作經驗較少的工程師無所適從。另外若同一產品或 製程上需同時考慮的品質特性愈複雜時,勢必單憑人為經驗的 • 判斷恐怕是不易辦到的。(Logothetis and Haigh,1988)以田 ^ 口方法結合多元迴歸分析法及多目標決策分析法應用於電漿 蝕刻的多個品質特性中,此法首先針對每個品質特性值,分別 計算其雜訊績效統計量(noise performance statistic,NPS) 和目標值績效統計量(target performance statistic,TPS) ,分別決定每個品質特性值的控制因子之最佳水準組合。再利 參 用多元迴歸分析法,以每個品質特性值為相依變數,以控制因 子為獨立變數,求出其線性迴歸式,最後以多目標決策分析法 找出製程最佳因子水準組合。此法雖由多維空間經過權值的加 入簡化到一維空間使問題簡化,然而存在於品質特性間的關聯 性卻未被納入決策過程中,其結果是否能得到真正的最佳組合 有待商榷,且此法演算過程繁雜,是否能在實務上應用值得懷 疑。(蕭綱衡,1990)以田口方法應用於鐵礦燒結製程為例,首 先將每一次實驗所量得的各項品質特性值轉換成S/N比,並賦 8 200534147200534147 0 IX. Description of the invention: [Technical field to which the invention belongs] The present invention relates to the improvement of various industrial processes, and generally refers to the aspects of the process where the industry is at a loss and the parameters are complex and difficult to judge. In particular, considering the interaction between process parameters, how to effectively find the main parameters that affect the process, and at the same time to find the optimization method of process parameter combinations with multiple quality characteristics. [Previous technology] In order to improve product quality, the industry mostly adopts the accumulated experience of past actual operation or the method of trial and error as a reference when processing. ♦ Most processing machine manufacturers only provide judgment systems or reference books. Help the manufacturer choose processing conditions or process planning according to processing requirements. The purpose is to meet the processing requirements and choose a better parameter combination control method. In recent years, the academic community has focused on the establishment of algorithms that meet multiple quality characteristics and the use of various methods to solve the optimization of processing processes. Among the earlier literatures (Osyczka et al., 1982) proposed the use of multi-objective decision-making ( multi-criteria) optimization method improvement | multi-quality characteristics problem. (Lin et al., 2000) proposed a combination of Taguchi method and fuzzy theory to analyze the optimal parameter combination for multi-quality characteristics. In summary, although the above-mentioned literature combines various methods to improve the quality characteristics, it also lacks the basis to influence the selection of the main parameters of the process. At the same time, in the course of the experiment, each paper only considered the quality characteristics and ignored the interaction relationship between the factors, so that the final results were not the same, and could not be effectively applied to industry practice. Therefore, an effective analysis of the interaction between the main parameters of the process and the consideration of factors can really improve the quality problem. 6 200534147 Rough set theory (Data Mining) is mainly used for analysis of uncertain or inaccurate data. It mainly assists decision-makers to use classification and attribute reduction methods for a large database. Minimal decision algorithm that enables decision makers to quickly find the source of the problem. Related literature studies such as (Kusiak and Kurasek, 2001) use rough set theory to identify the factors that cause solder balls in the printed circuit during soldering to find out the problem. (SriniVasan and Moon, 1999) A group of clustering algorithms is proposed based on many quality characteristics. The Xiang average link method is used as the clustering rule. As long as the product characteristics that have an effect on performance are included in the algorithm, the crowds are clustered on the basis. . (Including Han et al., HU to analyze semiconductor process problems, to analyze the strategic tree, find the shadow station and pass through the machine _, thereby narrowing the source of process ㈣. = Star 4, touch side secret and rough set theory In the process of chemical products, find the classification of each attribute and possible value of the system, and use the Bayesian network to find the probability value for each condition. In order to effectively analyze the influence of control parameters from many process parameters, the discriminant matrix method (D1SCernibllity matrix) in rough set theory is used. The main purpose of this method is to perform a set of all attributes (parameters) in an information system. Attribute simplification. The process is to put all the data related to the attributes (parameters) in the database into a matrix. After logical operations, the core in the database is obtained. (reducts) attributes. Sh Taguchi method is mainly aimed at the development of low-cost and robust production port 'at the same time pay attention to the optimization of products and manufacturing methods. In the past; ^ Taguchi method of literature research or practical application Most of them focus on the processing of single-characteristic system 7 200534147 1 # process optimization, but the quality characteristics of the product process is often not unique. If you only seek to optimize the process with a single quality characteristic, except that the true process may not be achieved. Demand, it also loses many opportunities to improve product quality characteristics and reduce costs. For example, the early (Phadke, 1989) applied the Taguchi method to super In the polycrystalline silicon deposition process of the integrated circuit, if the optimization factor level selection conflicts between different quality characteristics, use relevant engineering experience or knowledge to make a judgment to determine the overall optimal factor level. Combination. This method depends on the relatively subjective knowledge and experience of the engineer. Although the analysis is simple, there are no clear judgment rules ^, which also makes engineers with less work experience incomprehensible. In addition, if the same product or process needs to consider the quality at the same time When the characteristics are more complicated, it is bound to rely on human experience alone. • Judgement may not be easy to achieve. (Logothetis and Haigh, 1988) The field method combined with multiple regression analysis and multi-objective decision analysis is applied to plasma etching. For each quality characteristic, this method first calculates the noise performance statistic (NPS) and target performance statistic (TPS) for each quality characteristic value, and determines each quality characteristic separately. The best level combination of the control factors of the value. With reference to multiple regression analysis, each quality characteristic value is a dependent variable, and the control factor is an independent variable. The linear regression formula is obtained. Finally, the multi-objective decision analysis method is used to find the optimal combination of factor levels in the process. Although this method simplifies the problem from the multi-dimensional space through the addition of weights to the one-dimensional space to simplify the problem, the correlation between the quality characteristics has not been included in the decision-making process. Whether the results can be truly the best combination is open to question. Moreover, the calculation process of this method is complicated, and it is doubtful whether it can be applied in practice. (Xiao Gangheng, 1990) Take the Taguchi method applied to the iron sintering process as an example. First, each quality characteristic value measured in each experiment is converted into an S / N ratio, and 8 200534147 is assigned.
I A 予每一個品質特性值之S/N比一權重,且加總各類品質特性之 S/N比,以作為多重品質特性值之績效衡量準則,最後找出最 佳因子水準組合。此法雖然簡單易懂,但各品質特性的權重決 定不易,因此這種結果的合理性亦待研究。 本研究將以田口方法作為在考慮製程參數間存在交互作 用下,解決品質特性最佳因子水準問題的方法,並將實驗數據 以S/N比方法分析結果,並提出利用預測值分析作為解決在考 慮製程參數間存在交互作用下,所造成的因子水準衝突的問題 品質特性是產品開發或製程最終的指標。雖然多位學者紛 紛提出許多解決多重品質特性最佳化的方法,但始終無法把品 質特性的重要程度展現出來。(Derringer and Suich,1980) 以理想函數應用於多重品質特性的製程問題,利用多元迴歸分 析法,分別將各品質特性及可控因子構建出其線性迴歸式。此 法雖然能使多重品質特性問題簡化,然而此法演算過程繁雜, 是否能在實務上應用值得懷疑。(Nian and Tarng,1999)針對 • 車床製程的各個品質特性損失函數作正規化,再對產品品質不 同的重要性分別給予不同的權重來計算總損失函數,然後將損 失函數轉換成S/N比再選定參數和各水準,最後定義最佳參數 。此法對於各品質特性的權重決定不易,因此這種結果的合理 性亦待研究。(Pignatiel lo etal.,1993)重新定義了一個考 慮品質特性相關性的損失函數,作為多重品質特性產品及製程 的績效評估指標,並提出最佳化多品質特性問題的策略。此法 不易精確估計品質損失函數,且需更多實驗才能估計精確的共 9 200534147 變異矩陣。(Tong and Su,1997)提出以主成份分析法來解決 多重品質特性產品及製程最佳化的問題。在例子中未說明當處 置兩個或兩個以上的主成份時,應如何選取最佳組合,因此在 未能充分使用各個品質特性值所有資訊下,是否能求得最佳組 合值得商榷。文獻中眾多學者提出處理多重品質特性的方法, 其中大都以迴歸分析法與灰關聯分析法為主,然而迴 卻有以下缺點·· / π不妖儺過少則難Mae肌旰现伴,所以需大量數據。I A gives a weight to the S / N ratio of each quality characteristic value, and adds up the S / N ratios of various quality characteristics to serve as a performance measure for multiple quality characteristic values, and finally finds the best combination of factor levels. Although this method is simple and easy to understand, it is not easy to determine the weight of each quality characteristic, so the rationality of this result needs to be studied. In this study, the Taguchi method is used as a method to solve the problem of the best factor level of quality characteristics considering the interaction between process parameters. The experimental data is analyzed by the S / N ratio method, and the prediction value analysis is proposed as a solution. Considering the interaction between process parameters, the problem of factor level conflict caused by quality characteristics is the final indicator of product development or process. Although many scholars have proposed many ways to solve the optimization of multiple quality characteristics, the importance of quality characteristics has never been demonstrated. (Derringer and Suich, 1980) The ideal function is applied to the process problem with multiple quality characteristics, and the multiple regression analysis method is used to construct a linear regression formula for each quality characteristic and controllable factor. Although this method can simplify the problem of multiple quality characteristics, the calculation process of this method is complicated, and it is doubtful whether it can be applied in practice. (Nian and Tarng, 1999) Normalize the loss function of each quality characteristic of the lathe process, and then give different weights to the different importance of product quality to calculate the total loss function, and then convert the loss function into S / N ratio Then select the parameters and levels, and finally define the best parameters. This method is not easy to determine the weight of each quality characteristic, so the rationality of this result needs to be studied. (Pignatiel lo etal., 1993) redefines a loss function that takes into account the correlation of quality characteristics as a performance evaluation index for multiple quality characteristics products and processes, and proposes strategies for optimizing multiple quality characteristics. This method is not easy to accurately estimate the quality loss function, and more experiments are needed to estimate the accurate total variation matrix. (Tong and Su, 1997) proposed the use of principal component analysis to solve the problem of optimizing multiple quality products and processes. The example does not explain how to choose the best combination when two or more principal components are disposed. Therefore, it is questionable whether the best combination can be obtained without fully using all the information of each quality characteristic value. Many scholars in the literature have proposed methods to deal with multiple quality characteristics, most of which are mainly regression analysis and grey correlation analysis. However, they have the following disadvantages. Large amounts of data.
2·要求樣本有較好的分佈規律,尤其以線性迴歸為佳。 如樣本為非線性時,則會造成大量的演算過程。 所以可以得知,迴歸分析法的侷限性較大,而灰色理論則 十對上述缺點提出了一種新的分析方法,稱為灰關聯分析法, 間發展態勢的相似或相異程度,來衡量因素間 因素二斤(GreyRe〗ationaIAnaIy___ T素刀析特點’可彌補—般統計迴歸的缺點。較早的 :二::°()利用灰關聯分析法來解決半導體製程的多重 口方=:_陶利用灰色多屬性決策方法與田 万法解决1C製程的多品質特性的問題。 因此’本發明提出田口灰關聯法, 實驗與穩健性高的優點與灰關聯 疋二二:法少 的優點。不但以田σ方、心數據與多因素分析 負特性的最佳因子水準组合找出各时 多個品質特性下,斜料 Λ _刀析法’在同時考慮 下針對田口方法所求得所有的最佳組合,從中 200534147 % 分析出一組符合多品質特性的製程參數最適化組合。 【發明内容】 為解決上述製程改良等問題,本發明係提出一套製程改良 最適化的方法。首先對於製程中眾多參數其簡化方法,本發明結合 K-means群聚法與可辨識矩陣法(Discemibility matrix)作為分析影經製 程主要參數的方法。先利用K-means群聚法分析出各品質特性實驗結 果之優劣性。再以可辨識矩陣法(Discemibility matrix)針對實驗内所有製 程參數集合進行參數化簡,最後得到該實驗内的核心(core)參數或最簡 丨化(reducts)參數,即為影響製程的主要參數。 本發明將所求得之影響製程參數,利用田口直交表實驗計劃法作 為分析各品質特性製程參數組合最佳化的實驗設計架構,並在考慮製 程參數間存在交互作用下進行實驗,同時以,比分析實驗結果。最後 以預測值分析作為解決时慮製程參數間交互侧喊生的因子水準 衝突的問題。並求出實驗所得各品質特性製程參數最佳組合之預測值 〇 另外因田口方法在雜文獻研究中,所解決的問題都為單一品質 , 特性。如須解決多重品質特性的問題,則須配合其它方法理論。因此本 發明利用田口方法結合整體性灰關聯分析,作為解決田口方法所造成的 在考慮多重品質特性下因子水準衝突問題,並同時求得在考慮因子間交 互作用及多重品質特性下最適化的製程參數組合。 【實施方式】 >製程參數之簡化 本發明為取得辟餘的主要錄,制全因子實驗方式。立全 因子包含了完錄銷麵财參數,製程參财錢雜。為有效地區 200534147 分出實驗結果優劣性,本發明将刹τ, 科】用K-means群聚法根據品質特性的期 望值,對實驗結果區分為數群。立i r、K-means群聚法演算流程如圖i所示 K-means群聚法執行步驟 I.決定η個群組,並計算出每個群組中心點的初始值。 ZM-',Zn{i) 其中代表第n個族群,第—次中心點。2. Require the sample to have a good distribution law, especially linear regression is better. If the sample is non-linear, it will cause a lot of calculations. Therefore, it can be known that the regression analysis method has greater limitations, and the gray theory proposes a new analysis method for the above shortcomings, called the gray correlation analysis method. The degree of similarity or dissimilarity between development trends is used to measure factors. The factor of two factors (GreyRe〗 ationaIAnaIy___ T element analysis features can make up for the shortcomings of general statistical regression. Earlier: two:: ° () using gray correlation analysis method to solve the multiple aspects of the semiconductor process =: _ 陶The gray multi-attribute decision-making method and Tian Wan method are used to solve the problem of multi-quality characteristics of 1C process. Therefore, the present invention proposes the Taguchi gray correlation method, which has the advantages of high experiment and robustness and gray correlation 22: the advantages of fewer methods. Not only The best factor level combination of the negative characteristics of Tian σ square, heart data, and multi-factor analysis is used to find all the quality characteristics at each time. According to 200534147%, a set of process parameter optimization combinations meeting multiple quality characteristics is analyzed. [Summary of the Invention] In order to solve the above-mentioned problems such as process improvement, the present invention proposes a An optimized method for improving the manufacturing process. First of all, for the simplification of many parameters in the manufacturing process, the present invention combines the K-means clustering method and the discernibility matrix method as a method for analyzing the main parameters of the shadow process. First, the K- The clustering method is used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the experimental results of various quality characteristics. Then the discernibility matrix method is used to reduce the parameter set of all the process parameters in the experiment, and finally the core parameters or the most in the experiment are obtained. Reducts parameters are the main parameters that affect the manufacturing process. The present invention uses the Taguchi orthogonal table experimental plan method as the experimental design framework for optimizing the combination of process parameters with various quality characteristics. The experiment is performed under the consideration of the interaction between process parameters. At the same time, the experimental results are analyzed by comparison. Finally, the predicted value analysis is used to solve the problem of factor level conflicts that are considered during the interaction between process parameters. The experimental results are obtained. The predicted value of the best combination of quality characteristics and process parameters. In addition, the Taguchi method is used in miscellaneous literature research. The problems to be solved are single quality and characteristic. If the problem of multiple quality characteristics must be solved, other methods and theories must be matched. Therefore, the present invention uses the Taguchi method in combination with the holistic gray correlation analysis as a solution to the Taguchi method. The factor level conflict problem under quality characteristics, and at the same time, the optimal combination of process parameters is obtained by considering the interaction between factors and multiple quality characteristics. [Embodiment] > Simplification of process parameters The experimental method of making a full factor. The full factor includes the parameters of the recording and sales process, and the process is involved in money. In order to distinguish the advantages and disadvantages of the experimental results in 200534147, the present invention uses K-means clustering method. According to the expected value of quality characteristics, the experimental results are divided into several groups. The calculation process of the Li-I, K-means clustering method is shown in Figure i. The K-means clustering method performs step I. Determine n groups, and calculate the initial value of the center point of each group. ZM-', Zn {i) which stands for the nth ethnic group, the first-second center point.
Π·比幸乂每個點與各中心點的差值,再將各點歸納至適合的群組内。 _ ZjH\ThenX 6 sxn)fori>j-_1>2r..>n{2) 其中jst為具制性值的#料點,咖為代表第丨個分類鱗的集合。 計算兩群組的各點與各中心點的差值,依各點差值作為再次分群之 依據。 H·歸肩兀成後,再依公式⑺重新計算各群組之中心點。當中心點新、 舊值相等時或收般鱗各點已無變化時即停止演算,否則必須重新執 行II項步驟。Π · Bingxing 乂 The difference between each point and each center point, and then the points are grouped into a suitable group. _ ZjH \ ThenX 6 sxn) fori &j; j-_1 > 2r .. > n {2) where jst is a # material point with a restrictive value, and coffee is a set representing the first classification scale. Calculate the difference between each point in the two groups and each center point, and use the difference in points as the basis for regrouping. After H. shoulder to shoulder, recalculate the center point of each group according to formula ⑺. The calculation will be stopped when the new and old values of the center point are equal, or the points of the scale have not changed. Otherwise, step II must be performed again.
ZXn+Hj^=^ ⑶ 其中#為5/^;族群所屬的义個數。 倘若計算結果已滿足收斂至族群各點已無變化則停止演算。 接著本發明係_粗集合理論(RGUgh Set)作為製程參數簡化方法 ,以有效求得影響製程最主要的參數。其演算過程主要是將資料庫帽 ^有關參數(屬性)區分的資料都置人—個矩陣中,再透過邏輯運算後, 知到该貝料庫内的核心(core)屬性或最簡化(reduct幻屬性。該方法定義為 12 200534147ZXn + Hj ^ = ^ ⑶ where # is 5 / ^; the number of meanings to which the group belongs. If the calculation result meets the convergence to all points in the ethnic group, the calculation is stopped. Then, the present invention adopts RGUgh Set as a method for simplifying process parameters, so as to effectively obtain the most important parameters that affect the process. The calculation process is mainly to put the data related to the database cap ^ related parameters (attributes) into a matrix, and then through logical operations, know the core (core) attributes or the most simplified (reduct) Magic attribute. This method is defined as 12 200534147
識矩陣可利用下列方程式表示之: ‘域且"^^^,···,'},d是 x在屬性α上的值,因此可辨The recognition matrix can be expressed by the following equation: ‘domain and &^; ^^^, ···, '}, d is the value of x on the attribute α, so it can be discerned
1 ,ΦΟ=φ^),1, ΦΟ = φ ^),
其中Ζ)為決策屬性,α為條件屬性 ’其演异步驟(Walczak and 依上述方程式(4)來架構可辨識矩陣Where Z) is the decision attribute, α is the condition attribute, and its differentiating step (Walczak and construct the discernible matrix according to the above equation (4)
Massart,1999)如下所示: 1·首先判斷決策屬性(D): 2·若決策屬性(D)相等,則條件屬性用〇代入。 3·若決策屬性(D)不相等,再依序判斷條件屬性。 4·若條件屬性相等者,則條件屬性用丨代入。 5·若條件屬性不相等者,則用該條件屬性代入。 可辨識矩陣建構完成後,將各攔内之各屬性值間先作OR運算,接 著再與其餘攔位作AND運算,將所得計算式最後再以邏輯運算求出其 核心(core)屬性或最簡化(reducts)屬性之所在。其中計算所得結果若為個 別獨立因子’則稱此因子為該實驗表之核心(core)屬性,反之則稱為該 貫驗表之最簡化(reducts)屬性。 >各品質特性製程參數組合最佳化 本發明將所求得之影響製程的主要參數,利用田口直交表實驗計 劃法作為分析各品質特性製程參數組合最佳化的實驗設計架構,並在考 慮製程參數間存在交互作用下進行實驗,同時以S/N比分析實驗結果。 13 200534147 最後以預測值分析作為解決 水準衝突關題。並求心& /交互個喊生的因子 值。本發_以實際碰製程參録她合之預測 攄。一直心=:=r取依 a.確定品質特性 α。質特性是產品開發或製程最終的触 的問題。依照_師输小齡^雜望目=決 b· 確定因子水準 古无Sr製程巾會影_難的參數稱之為因子。其每個因子都 ^不同的數值《範_卩為轉),轉值的設定需在合 為不同的水準設定對於品質特性影響是非常的明顯。 因 C· 直交表設置 參數因子依自由度計算邮最適合交表進行配置 鼻如公式(5)所示。Massart, 1999) is as follows: 1. First determine the decision attributes (D): 2. If the decision attributes (D) are equal, the condition attributes are substituted with 0. 3. If the decision attributes (D) are not equal, then judge the condition attributes sequentially. 4. If the condition attributes are equal, the condition attributes are substituted with 丨. 5. If the condition attributes are not equal, substitute the condition attribute. After the construction of the discernible matrix is completed, an OR operation is performed on each attribute value in each block, and then an AND operation is performed with the remaining blocks. The obtained calculation formula is finally obtained by logical operation to obtain its core attribute or the most Where the reducts attribute is. Among them, if the calculated result is an individual independent factor ', this factor is called the core attribute of the experimental table, otherwise it is called the most simplified attribute of the pass table. > Optimization of process parameter combination of each quality characteristic The present invention uses Taguchi orthogonal experiment plan method as the experimental design framework for analyzing the optimization of each quality characteristic process parameter combination, and considers the main parameters affecting the process. The experiment was performed under the interaction between process parameters, and the experimental results were analyzed by S / N ratio. 13 200534147 Finally, predictive value analysis is used to solve the problem of level conflict. And find the factor of heart & / interaction. Benfa_ Records her He's predictions based on the actual production process. Centering === r depends on a. Determine the quality characteristic α. Quality characteristics are the ultimate issue in product development or manufacturing processes. According to _ teacher lose Xiaoling ^ miscellaneous eyes = determine b. Determine the level of the factor The parameters of the ancient Sr-free process will be called factors. Each of its factors has a different value, "Fan_ 卩 is a revolution." The setting of the transition value must be set at a different level. The effect on the quality characteristics is very obvious. Due to the setting of C. Orthogonal form, the parameter factor is calculated according to the degree of freedom. The post is the most suitable for delivery form configuration. The nose is shown in formula (5).
自由度計 DOF = ^ + 7 + 7 (5 其中Z為时數乘以(轉數_1},γ為交互作賴愤軸(水準數 ,1 ··為誤差平均自由度。 在選擇直交表時需注意·· a·實驗數2自由度 b•含交互作用時依其點線圖選擇最適合的直交表 由公式(5)求得實驗自由度。倘若考慮各參數間的交互作用時,則 在選擇直交表時需配合點線圖。 14 200534147 d·執行實驗 e·實驗結果分析 本發明針對所得實驗數據,利用S/N(信號/雜訊)比分析作為求出各 品質特性最佳組合的方法。再以預測值分析⑹計算各組合最佳預測值, 最後以所得預測值作為解決參數最佳組合因子水準衝突問題的取捨依 據。 又 广⑺+ (M-她-顿-她-相_抑广岣⑹ 其中讲為品質特性總平均值,為水準設定值,〜< 為獨立因子最 佳水準平均值’ Μ為交互侧之最佳因子水準平均值。 S/Ν比分析 在田口實驗設計騎巾’田π博士將信姆訊比(Signal_t〇_N〇ise (S/Ν) ’單位:分貝,dedba卜此)定義為穩健性的評估標準,以對數轉 換、乘以H)、並取反絲示之。躲是⑽數值且其值愈小愈 好的稱之為望小特性,而非貞數值且其值愈场好的稱之為望大特性, 若當品質特性有設定目標值時,則稱之為望目特性。本發明首先將所得 各品質特性量測值依不同特性,由公式⑺、⑻轉換成_比,再由公 式⑼侧求得全體平均值m及因子(包含交互作_各水準平均值= 、U。並從所計算數據結果,依據各品質特性的賊值選擇如子最佳 ⑺ ⑻ 望,1、型 S/Ν = -Wlogifx ητ^ι 丨 1域 S/N = —1〇di nTti X 2 15 (9) 200534147 其中义代表Μ實驗結果記驗,〃為實驗總次數。 m =DOF = DOF = ^ + 7 + 7 (5 where Z is the number of hours multiplied by (the number of revolutions _1), γ is the interaction axis (level, 1 ··· is the mean freedom degree of error. When choosing the orthogonal table Please pay attention when ... a. The number of experiments 2 degrees of freedom b. In the case of interaction, select the most suitable orthogonal table according to its point and line graph. Obtain the experimental degrees of freedom from formula (5). If the interaction between parameters is considered, When selecting an orthogonal table, you need to match the dot-line diagram. 14 200534147 d · Experiment e. Analysis of experimental results The present invention uses S / N (signal / noise) ratio analysis to obtain the best quality characteristics for the obtained experimental data. The combination method. Then, the predicted value analysis of each combination is used to calculate the best predicted value for each combination. Finally, the obtained predicted value is used as the basis for solving the problem of the optimal combination factor level conflict of the parameters. You Guangyi + (M-her-ton-her- PHASE_YI Guang 岣 ⑹ Among them is the total average value of the quality characteristics, which is the level setting value, ~ < is the best factor average value of the independent factor 'Μ is the best factor level average value of the interactive side. The S / N ratio analysis is in Taguchi experimental design riding towel 'Dr. Tian Pi will be more than Signal_t〇 _N〇ise (S / N) 'Unit: decibel, dedba (defined here) is defined as a criterion for evaluating robustness, which is converted logarithmically, multiplied by H), and shown in reverse. The hidden value is the smaller the value and the smaller the value The better is called the small-magnitude property, and the better the value is called the large-magnitude property, if the quality characteristic has a set target value, it is called the long-range characteristic. The present invention first The measured values of each quality characteristic are converted into _ ratio from formulas ⑺ and 依 according to different characteristics, and then the overall average m and factors (including interactions _ each level average =, U.) are obtained from the formula ⑼ side. Calculate the results of the data, and select the best sub-rule according to the thief value of each quality characteristic. 1, type S / N = -Wlogifx ητ ^ ι 丨 1 domain S / N = —1〇di nTti X 2 15 (9) 200534147 The meaning represents the test result of M, and 〃 is the total number of experiments. M =
LL
(10) 其中代表《項實驗結果記錄值,〃為實驗總次數。〜代表第7·個因子 摘值,,為第ζ個水準的實驗總次數。 ,本發明以各主要參數因 再以各品質特性期望值作 在未含交互作用參數最佳組合選取方面 子在各不同水準下,依公式(10)所計算結果, 為選擇依據。 面,本發明以各主要參數因子 再以各品質特性賊值作為選(10) Which represents the recorded value of the experimental results, 〃 is the total number of experiments. ~ Represents the 7th factor extraction value, and is the total number of experiments at the ζ level. In the present invention, the main parameter factors and the expected values of the quality characteristics are used as the basis for selecting the optimal combination selection of the interaction parameters without including the interaction parameters at different levels according to formula (10). In the present invention, the main parameter factors and the thief value of each quality characteristic are used as the selection.
在含父互作用參數最佳組合選取方 在相同水準下,依公式(10)所計算結果, 擇依據。 多重品質特性製程參數組合最適化 灰關聯分析主要為分析離散序觸關聯程度的_酬度計算方法 ,具有少數據及乡因素分析的特點’剛好可以彌補傳統統計迴歸的多項 限制。另外嚇物_b刚咖__,此輪到、 聯度也相對增加,所以如將這些灰關聯度加以排序,可以構成—個矩陣 ’稱為灰關聯矩陣。然後透過此—灰關矩陣的各缝間之關係,進行 200534147 t * ,1998) 各因素間的分析,此财法稱之為題喊M分析(江金山等 {執行正體性灰關聯分析時’序列需符合以下規則。 (一)、 因子空間 假°又印為一種的主題所得到的因子隹人2 阶)4 ^ =口、于集口 ’ ^為影響關係 1 口具有下列特性,此時則稱户(Χ)必為因子空間。 •哥、建因子的存雜··餘巾包含難因子的存在。 2·内涵0子的可數性:因子的數目是有限的而且可數的。 因子的了擴充性·除關鍵因子外,可加入其他因子。 4·因子的獨立性:各因子之間均為獨立性 a,均可視為是獨立的。The selection method is based on the best combination of parent interaction parameters. At the same level, the basis is calculated according to the result calculated by formula (10). Optimization of multi-quality characteristic process parameter combination Gray correlation analysis is mainly used to analyze the degree of discrete order and correlation. It has the characteristics of less data and rural factor analysis, which can just make up for many limitations of traditional statistical regression. In addition, the scary _b Gangca__, this time, the relative degree has also increased, so if you rank these gray correlation degrees, you can form a matrix ′ called the gray correlation matrix. Then through this relationship between the seams of the gray-gray matrix, 200534147 t *, 1998) is analyzed among various factors. This financial method is called the title M analysis (Jiang Jinshan et al {when performing regular gray correlation analysis' The sequence must conform to the following rules: (1) Factor space false ° is printed as a theme and the factor obtained is 2nd order) 4 ^ = 口, Yu Jikou '^ is the relationship of influence 1 口 has the following characteristics, at this time Then it is said that the household (X) must be a factor space. • Brother and Jian's existence of miscellaneous factors. • Towel contains the existence of difficult factors. 2. Countability of connotation 0: the number of factors is limited and countable. Factor expansion: In addition to key factors, other factors can be added. 4. Independence of factors: each factor is independent a, and can be regarded as independent.
本研究之每個因子對整體而 (二)、序列之可比性條件 設一原始序列為: 其中VO代表序列χ,中第灸項實驗紀錄值;灸=/2Each factor of this study is related to the whole and (b), the comparability of the sequence. Let an original sequence be: where VO represents the sequence χ, the experimental record value of the middle moxibustion item; moxibustion = / 2
為全集合。 …〇’1…,n’X 若序列滿足以下三個條件,此時則稱此序列具有可比性。 1·無因次性(,dimen_ :不論因子的測度單位為何型態,都必須經過 處理成無因次性的型態。 2·同等級性(scaling):各序列\中之值咖均屬於同等級或等級相差 大於2。 3·同極性(p〇larizati〇n):序列中因子描述狀態須為同方向。 倘若品質特性所各量測數據值等級相差大於2時,則未能符合同 等級性之條件。因此本發明為有效執行灰關聯分析,須將所得數據依據 各品質特性期望值不同,以修飾型灰關聯生成處理(如公式12、13所示 17 200534147 ),以滿足實驗數據可比性。 望大型式:希望目標愈大愈好時 ___all i _wax# ⑻—wz>?e)㈤ all i all i (12) 望小型式:希望目標愈小愈好時 X:⑻= 顧X'⑻W - ⑻ all i _ (13) maxx(f\k)^ min^ik) all i all i 4%¼表序列中第灸項的原始實驗紀錄值;wi?xX/ ~所有序列'中 第灸項最大的原始實驗紀錄值;巧所有序列义中第灸項最小的原 始實驗紀錄值;々 = 7,2,···,《 ; ζ· = 0,7,·",π。 (二)、 灰關聯測度的四項公理(Axiom) 滿足由因子空間及可比性而形成的空間稱為灰關聯空間。假設 為灰關聯測度空間,厂為測度的大小,炉(1>厂}須滿足以 四個定理,使其更具完備性。 下 1、 規範性: 〇<y{xlixJ)<l ; V/,Vy /(ΧΆ)= 7時稱完全相關,時稱不相關 2、 偶對稱性:當只有兩組序列時Ηά)=/(ά) 3、 整體性·當序列大於三組(含三組)時 (14) 18 (15) (16) 200534147 > 1 4、接近性: 的主控項,亦即灰關聯 滿足以上定理,則稱 丨Χ/⑷一 Χ/㈣的大小為整個,h(4'W) 度的大小必須與此項有關。 若在灰關聯空間找到一函數厂 為灰關聯空間中的灰關聯度。For the full collection. ... 〇'1 ..., n'X If the sequence satisfies the following three conditions, then the sequence is said to be comparable. 1. Dimensionless (, dimen_: Regardless of the type of the unit of measure of the factor, it must be processed into a dimensionless form. 2. Scaling: The values in each sequence \ belong to The difference between the same grade or grade is greater than 2. 3. Same polarity (p〇larizati〇n): The factor description status in the sequence must be in the same direction. If the difference between the grades of the measured data values of the quality characteristics is greater than 2, it will not meet the same grade. Graded conditions. Therefore, in order to effectively perform gray correlation analysis, the present invention must modify the obtained data according to the expected value of each quality characteristic, and modify the gray correlation generation process (as shown in formulas 12, 13 17 200534147) to meet the experimental data comparable I hope that the large-scale: when the goal is bigger the better ___all i _wax # ⑻—wz >? E) ㈤ all i all i (12) I hope the small-scale: when the goal is smaller the better X: ⑻ = 顾 X '⑻W-⑻ all i _ (13) maxx (f \ k) ^ min ^ ik) all i all i 4% ¼ The original experimental record value of the moxibustion item in the table sequence; wi? XX / ~ all sequences The largest original experimental record value of the moxibustion item; the smallest original experimental record value of the second moxibustion item in the sequence meaning; 々 = 7 , 2, ..., "; ζ · = 0,7, · ", π. (B). The four axioms of the gray correlation measure (Axiom) satisfy the space formed by factor space and comparability called gray correlation space. Suppose it is a gray-related measurement space, and the factory is the size of the measurement. The furnace (1 > factory) must satisfy four theorems to make it more complete. The following 1, normative: 〇 < y {xlixJ) <l; V /, Vy / (χΆ) = 7 when it is said to be completely related, when it is said to be unrelated 2. Even symmetry: when there are only two groups of sequences Ηά) = / (ά) 3. Holisticity · When the sequence is greater than three groups (including (3 groups) (14) 18 (15) (16) 200534147 > 1 4. Proximity: The main control item of, that is, the gray relation satisfies the above theorem, then the size of 丨 X / ⑷ 一 Χ / ㈣ is the whole , The size of h (4'W) degree must be related to this item. If a function factory is found in the gray correlation space, it is the gray correlation degree in the gray correlation space.
(四)、灰關聯係數 在灰關聯空間{户(尤),·Γ}中,有一序列 其中'丫幻代表序列'中第灸項實驗紀錄值;灸=人二···,” 為全集合。 (17)(4) Gray correlation coefficient In the gray correlation space {house (you), · Γ}, there is a series of experimental record values of the moxibustion item in the 'Ya representative series'; moxibustion = person two ... Collection (17)
X 體性灰 灰關聯度依照兩個序列間的關聯程度,又分為局部性與整體1 關聯度,其灰關聯係數定義如下:The grayness of the X body is related to the degree of correlation between the two sequences, and is further divided into the degree of locality and the overall 1 degree of correlation. The gray correlation coefficient is defined as follows:
局部性灰關聯係數:只有一個序列〜(灸)為參考序列時。 (18) ΛχΜΦ))=^-ζ^Local grey correlation coefficient: when there is only one sequence ~ (moxibustion) as the reference sequence. (18) ΛχΜΦ)) = ^-ζ ^
Aoi[k) + ζΔΜαχ 其中為參考序列,' 為比較序列。ζ· = 7 乂又…,w;灸=厶2,又···:;# , (辨識係數产[〜?],一般辨識係數的數值均取〇 5。 = h⑻-调丨 4丫㈠為序列%和序列 ' 之間第灸項實驗相差值並取絕對值 min. min.Aoi [k) + ζΔΜαχ where is the reference sequence and 'is the comparison sequence. ζ · = 7 乂, again, w; moxibustion = 厶 2, again ... :: #, (identification coefficient yield [~?], the value of general identification coefficient is taken as 0. = h⑻- 调 丨 4 丫 ㈠ For the difference between the sequence% and the sequence of the moxibustion term experiment and take the absolute value min. Min.
Amin = Vy e 〇νψ0(Α:)^ x (19) (20) 200534147 > 翻 Λ max = V/ e 〇V^||x0 (k) - xj (A:| (21) 其中zlmh為序列〜和序列\之間,所有實驗項數的紀錄相差值中取最 小值。zlmox為序列X,和序列'之間,所有實驗項數(灸)的紀錄相差值中取 最大值。 整體性灰關聯係數:表示任一個序列'0)為參考序列時 (22) 細臟 Δ^) + ζΔιηαχAmin = Vy e 〇νψ0 (Α:) ^ x (19) (20) 200534147 > Λ max = V / e 〇V ^ || x0 (k)-xj (A: | (21) where zlmh is a sequence Between the sequence and the sequence \, the minimum value of the recorded phase difference between all experimental items is taken. Zlmox is the sequence X, and the sequence ', the maximum value of the recorded phase difference between all experimental items (moxibustion). Integrity gray Correlation coefficient: when any sequence '0) is a reference sequence (22) Fine dirty Δ ^) + ζΔιηαχ
其中’為參考序列,'為比較序列,/=/,2,3,·ί灸=人二3,·ί yd, ((辨識係數)eM,—般觸魏的數值均取〇·5。 4丫則冰)-训| (23)Among them, 'is a reference sequence,' is a comparison sequence, / = /, 2,3, · ίoxia = ren two 3, · ί yd, ((identification coefficient) eM,-the values of general contact are all taken as 0.5. 4 丫 则 冰)-training | (23)
Aj(k) ^ . χ 為序列’和序列'之間第灸項實驗相差值並取絕對值。Aj (k) ^. Χ is the absolute value of the difference between the experimental items of the moxibustion term between the sequence 'and the sequence'.
(24) max. max ^ax = \fjEm\\Xi(k)~Xj(q (25) 其令知為邮和相\間,所編卿)的編目差值中取最 ^一為邮和序列,乂間,所有實驗項納的紀錄相差值中取 辨識係數(〇 的為加大結果之差異性。其數值—般均取 。辨識係數數值m變化姉數值的 辨識係數(()的主要目 0.5 ’但可依實際需求作調整 20 200534147(24) max. Max ^ ax = \ fjEm \\ Xi (k) ~ Xj (q (25) The ordering difference between the postal and postal phases is known as postal and postal space), and the postal postal distance is the largest one The identification coefficients are taken from the recorded phase difference between all the experimental items and sequences (the value of 0 is to increase the difference of the results. The values are generally taken. The identification coefficients are changed from m and the identification coefficients (()) Head 0.5 'but can be adjusted according to actual needs 20 200534147
J I 大小,並不影響結果之排序。 (五)、整體性灰關聯度 在整體性灰關聯度中,由於每個序列均可以成為標準序列 ,因此在求出所有的灰關聯度後(公式26),可以用特徵值A的方式加以 排序。其演算步驟如以下所述: I η r(^i9xj)z:z-yLr(^i(k)fxj(k)) (26)J I size does not affect the ordering of results. (V) Global Grey Correlation Degree In the global grey correlation degree, since each sequence can become a standard sequence, after obtaining all the grey correlation degrees (formula 26), it can be added in the form of the characteristic value A. Sort. The calculation steps are as follows: I η r (^ i9xj) z: z-yLr (^ i (k) fxj (k)) (26)
η μ 、 Jη μ, J
其中义為參考序列,'為比較序列,;·=人二3,…,/2,灸=7乂3,···,《, r{xXk\x (k)) /為整體性灰關聯係數。 假設有多項序列為 〜=W/K(4 …,\W) :· = ·: ⑵,…,χ») 人乂每 固序列為標準序列,其它為比較序列,最後依所得的 值依序整理,即建立―個轉/^,此—矩陣即稱為『灰關聯 矩陣』。The meaning is the reference sequence, 'is the comparison sequence; · = person two 3,…, / 2, moxibustion = 7 乂 3, ···, ", r {xXk \ x (k)) / is the global gray correlation coefficient. Assume that there are multiple sequences of ~ = W / K (4…, \ W): · = ·: ⑵,…, χ ») The sequence of each sequence of human 乂 is a standard sequence, the others are comparison sequences, and the sequence is based on the obtained values. Sorting, that is to establish a transfer / ^, this-matrix is called "gray correlation matrix."
R r η γ r2I γ 13 22 lrmI γ m2R r η γ r2I γ 13 22 lrmI γ m2
Ylmr2m rt (27) 每一歹陣中的每-行表示同-參考序列對不同比較序列的影響, 的大小,八同標準序列對同一比較序列的影響。由於可根據灰關聯 的幻〃析出哪些因素是優勢, 哪些因素是劣勢,因此稱之為整體性 21 200534147 灰關聯分析。當矩陣的型態產生後,由於各元素均為灰關聯度的值,接 著計算a矩陣之特徵值他=狀糾矩陣之特徵向量p形成: ρ、=~α,υη} (28) 其中’如发从…乂代表對角矩陣,其具有特徵值乂"ν·.Λ在它的主 對角線上(其餘為零),構成矩陣户中所使用特徵向量的順序將會決定特徵 值出現在〜. ·. · Λ}之主對角線上的順序。 户矩陣為灰關聯矩料中η個線性獨立的特徵向量所組成。广為ρ的反矩 陣。 最後取最大特徵值L所對應的特徵向量,則其中該特徵向量中的各 對應元素數值大小即為權重Id(取絕對值)。此一權重%對灰關聯矩陣及 而言’可以表示成灰_矩陣中的主對角線元素在系統巾所佔重要性之評 比而取其大小排列則可代表系統中求取最佳序列的準則(吳漢雄等,1996) 〇 整體性灰關聯分析步驟 若貫驗結果量測數據不符合可比性,則須先將實驗數據分別代入( 公式12、13)作灰生成處理,使其各序列數據滿足可比性。再執行整體 性灰關聯分析。其演算步驟如下所示: 步称-:首先選擇某-品質雛生成值作為鮮序#,其餘品質特性生 成值為比較序列',在定f化的灰襲度之下求出灰_度的值,再以公 式(23)計算出其差序列之大小。 隨後經由公式(24)(25)求出兩極最大差」所似和最小差」所//?。 步驟二·•依照公式(22)計算出整體性灰關聯係數。取辨識係數 22 200534147 ξ = 0.5000 寻所選擇某-品質特性生成值作為標準序列^的整 體性灰Ylmr2m rt (27) Each line in each matrix represents the effect of the same-reference sequence on different comparison sequences, the size of the sequence, and the effect of eight identical standard sequences on the same comparison sequence. Because of the factors that can be identified according to the grey correlation, which are the advantages and disadvantages, they are called holistic 21 200534147 grey correlation analysis. When the matrix type is generated, since each element is the value of the gray correlation degree, then the eigenvalues of the a matrix are calculated. He = the eigenvector p of the shape correction matrix is formed: ρ, = ~ α, υη} (28) where ' If you send from… 乂 to represent a diagonal matrix, which has eigenvalues quot " ν · .Λ on its main diagonal (the rest are zero), the order of the eigenvectors used to form the matrix will determine the eigenvalues. Now ~. ·. · Λ} 's order on the main diagonal. The household matrix is composed of η linearly independent eigenvectors in gray-associated moments. Widely inverse matrix of ρ. Finally, the feature vector corresponding to the maximum feature value L is taken, and the numerical value of each corresponding element in the feature vector is the weight Id (take an absolute value). This weight% can be expressed as a gray correlation matrix and 'can be expressed as a ratio of the importance of the main diagonal elements in the gray matrix to the system towel, and its size arrangement can represent the best sequence in the system. Criterion (Wu Hanxiong et al., 1996) 〇 If the overall gray correlation analysis step does not meet the comparability of the measured data, the experimental data must first be substituted into (Equations 12, 13) for gray generation processing to make each sequence data Meet comparability. Then perform a global gray correlation analysis. The calculation steps are as follows: Step name-: First select a certain quality quality generation value as the fresh order #, and the remaining quality characteristic generation values are comparison sequences. Value, and then calculate the size of the difference sequence by formula (23). Then, the maximum difference "like and minimum difference" between the two poles is obtained by formulas (24) and (25). Step 2 • Calculate the overall gray correlation coefficient according to formula (22). Take the identification coefficient 22 200534147 ξ = 0.5000 Find the generated value of the selected quality characteristic as the overall gray of the standard sequence ^
步驟二:依照公式⑽計算出以等權為標準的整體性灰關聯度 後可得到所選品質雜生紐作為縣相\的整雜灰關聯度。 步称四:將所得之各序列灰_度值依序代人以下矩陣L中,並求^ 特徵值^。 一 rI2 rI3 y 2! 7 22 ··· m2 rmJ r • · · ύ t Im • · · y ,2m • l • · > · · y • mm 由矩陣計算得到特徵值乂大小,以最大特徵值^所對應 徵向量的對應數值為權重1^,此一權# 製程的重要程度。 健了喊不成各品_性對於整個 度大小再代墙品娜A,而㈣崎特性糊Step 2: Calculate the overall gray correlation degree using the equal weight as the standard according to formula 可, and then obtain the selected quality hybrid button as the county's overall gray correlation degree. Step 4: Substitute the gray-degree values of the sequences into the following matrix L in order, and find ^ characteristic values ^. 1 rI2 rI3 y 2! 7 22 ··· m2 rmJ r • · · ύ t Im • · · y, 2m • l • · > · · y • mm Calculate the eigenvalue 乂 size from the matrix, using the largest eigenvalue The corresponding value of the corresponding eigenvector is the weight 1 ^, which is the importance of the # process. I ca n’t make it into everything. Sex is for the entire degree and replaces Pinna A, but Ayazaki ’s characteristic paste
接者利賴糊理射的取小(minimum)與取大㈣咖㈣觀冬 (祕,1965)。首先將各個品質特性的歸屬度取小i A =V伽叫(代表娜崎撕蝴,即得到以下 之集合(D)。 最後取出D中的最大值心(代表針對所得多重品質特性 重要因子水準組合取聯集)。 23 200534147 所得之Dmax所對應之重要因子水準組合即為在同時考慮因子間交 互作用及多重品質特性下,利用整體灰關聯分析所得影響製程參數最適 化的組合。 【圖式簡單說明】 第1圖係K-means群聚法流程圖 第2圖係田口方法實驗流程圖The successor took advantage of the minimum and the big cock to watch the winter (secret, 1965). Firstly, the attribution degree of each quality characteristic is taken as small i A = V Jia (representing Nazaki tear butterfly, that is to obtain the following set (D). Finally, the maximum center in D is taken out (represents the level of important factors for the obtained multiple quality characteristics The combination of the combination and the associated set.) 23 200534147 The important factor level combination corresponding to Dmax is the combination that optimizes the process parameter obtained by using the overall gray correlation analysis while considering the interaction between factors and multiple quality characteristics. [Schematic Brief description] Figure 1 is the flow chart of K-means clustering method. Figure 2 is the experimental flow chart of Taguchi method.
24twenty four
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW94122618A TW200534147A (en) | 2005-07-04 | 2005-07-04 | The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW94122618A TW200534147A (en) | 2005-07-04 | 2005-07-04 | The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TW200534147A true TW200534147A (en) | 2005-10-16 |
Family
ID=52348708
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW94122618A TW200534147A (en) | 2005-07-04 | 2005-07-04 | The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TW200534147A (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI632470B (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2018-08-11 | 國立成功大學 | Virtual material quality investigation method and computer program product |
TWI637248B (en) * | 2017-04-24 | 2018-10-01 | 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 | Method and system for designing steelmaking process |
CN110503288A (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2019-11-26 | 郑芳田 | Consider the System and method for of the interactive identification yield loss reason of board |
CN111505403A (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2020-08-07 | 泰达电子股份有限公司 | Design and test method of test plan |
US11436115B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2022-09-06 | Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited | Test method of test plan |
TWI797089B (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2023-04-01 | 聯華電子股份有限公司 | Manufacture parameters grouping and analyzing method, and manufacture parameters grouping and analyzing system |
-
2005
- 2005-07-04 TW TW94122618A patent/TW200534147A/en unknown
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI637248B (en) * | 2017-04-24 | 2018-10-01 | 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司 | Method and system for designing steelmaking process |
TWI632470B (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2018-08-11 | 國立成功大學 | Virtual material quality investigation method and computer program product |
TWI797089B (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2023-04-01 | 聯華電子股份有限公司 | Manufacture parameters grouping and analyzing method, and manufacture parameters grouping and analyzing system |
CN110503288A (en) * | 2018-05-17 | 2019-11-26 | 郑芳田 | Consider the System and method for of the interactive identification yield loss reason of board |
CN111505403A (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2020-08-07 | 泰达电子股份有限公司 | Design and test method of test plan |
CN111505403B (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2022-06-28 | 泰达电子股份有限公司 | Design and test method of test plan |
US11436115B2 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2022-09-06 | Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited | Test method of test plan |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106055918B (en) | Method for identifying and correcting load data of power system | |
CN115270965B (en) | Power distribution network line fault prediction method and device | |
TW200534147A (en) | The suitable method for selection of manufacturing factors and the best combination of interactive factors under multiple quality properties | |
CN103839057B (en) | A kind of antimony flotation operating mode's switch method and system | |
CN106407464A (en) | KNN-based improved missing data filling algorithm | |
CN110503462A (en) | Power grid investment measuring and calculating method, system and medium based on grey correlation degree analysis | |
CN109919356A (en) | One kind being based on BP neural network section water demand prediction method | |
Zhang et al. | Developed density peak clustering with support vector data description for access network intrusion detection | |
CN117689661B (en) | Method and system for detecting coating defects on surface of medical breathable material | |
CN116933962A (en) | Clustering method for load characteristics and adjustable potential of power consumer | |
Lingqing et al. | Detection method for power theft based on SOM neural network and K-means clustering algorithm | |
CN113591322A (en) | Low-voltage transformer area line loss rate prediction method based on extreme gradient lifting decision tree | |
CN109255394B (en) | Forced oscillation identification method based on mode similarity | |
Olivares-Rojas et al. | Machine learning model for the detection of electric energy fraud using an edge-fog computing architecture | |
CN111832645A (en) | Classification data feature selection method based on discrete crow difference collaborative search algorithm | |
CN115394381B (en) | High-entropy alloy hardness prediction method and device based on machine learning and two-step data expansion | |
CN111027612A (en) | Energy metering data feature reduction method and device based on weighted entropy FCM | |
Lardin-Puech et al. | Analysing large datasets of functional data: a survey sampling point of view | |
Liu et al. | Short-term power load forecasting via recurrent neural network with similar day selection | |
CN114065109A (en) | Optimal selection method for power system demand response aggregation users | |
Yang et al. | An improved probabilistic neural network with ga optimization | |
CN112748358A (en) | Power distribution network ground fault identification method and system based on artificial immune network | |
Baobao et al. | An enhancement of K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm using information gain and extension relativity | |
CN117236381B (en) | Cutter wear monitoring method based on triplet length short-time memory neural network | |
Kong et al. | Based on WOA-BP neural network power the behavior detection |