TR202022546A2 - AHI COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION PORTAL - Google Patents

Abstract

This invention is related to the education portal based on high competence, which aims to increase the quality of educational activities carried out especially in higher education institutions, to create a strong link between program competencies and course learning outcomes, and to establish standards in determining competencies. The user management and authorization module (1), where the authorization process is made in the system for each user through the main server, the basic parameters of all open academic units in the educational institution (such as the department, department and programs in the Institute / Faculty / School) and the curriculum created for each program. The curriculum development module (2), where it is automatically transferred to the system via the server, the content definition module in which the program competencies and course learning outcomes are defined in the database of the system for academic programs, the files and information packages are uploaded for the gains and achievements, the subject, objectives and resources of the course are defined (3), As a result of the analysis of the answers entered by the students into the database as a result of the exam conducted on the system, the system does the item analysis of the questions (difficulty, discrimination, etc.) It consists of the measurement and evaluation module (4) that gives n.

Description

DESCRIPTION AHI PROFICIENCY BASED EDUCATION PORTAL Technological Field: This invention is especially important in education-training carried out in higher education institutions. to increase the quality of activities, program competencies and course learning outcomes. to establish a strong bond between them and to set standards in determining competencies It is about the ahi competency-based education portal that aims to create

State of the Art: Turkish Higher Education Qualifications Framework (TYYÇ) in current education systems establishing a hierarchical link between program competencies and course learning outcomes Mechanisms to regulate and control this relationship does not exist. In short, for competency-based education in Turkish higher education established standards and the mechanisms by which these standards will be implemented It is not possible to reach the learning outcomes of the courses taken by the students. There is also no mechanism to monitor and evaluate the failure to achieve. Each how much planning, implementation and implementation of teaching within the Bologna process Although it is recommended to consider competencies in the assessment stages control and follow-up of this process was difficult and is under the initiative of the teaching staff.

The biggest disadvantage of current practices is that qualifications at the higher education level are in accordance with both pedagogical and andragogical principles and taxonomic hierarchy. is not determined. On the other hand, whether the predicted competencies have been achieved or not. is not known and there is no standard structure in this regard. pre-invention There is no system that measures the level and quality of education given in higher education.

Academics will evaluate the achievements of the courses they will teach and their program proficiency. determine their own relations and there is no effective control of them.

In today's conditions, in higher education institutions without creating a specific system It is very difficult to monitor and control the training activities carried out. High education within the scope of the Bologna process applied in higher education academic institutions evaluation and quality improvement commission (YÖDEK) and National Qualifications Its framework has not been determined. In this way, higher education programs based on competencies a system is envisaged, but there is a difference between program qualifications and course learning outcomes. Mechanisms to ensure relationship and harmony have not been established. Moreover, check this relationship. no system has been developed. However, those who train experts in certain fields Qualifications and learning outcomes in higher education institutions are interrelated. It should be defined in such a way that it will be and appropriate teaching and evaluation should be done.

The main problem in existing systems is the programs applied in higher education. are uncertainties about reaching the competencies that students are expected to acquire. This In this context, which qualifications are determined in the education given in higher education institutions? the absence of a Learning Management System that measures the level of is the lack of a platform for the implementation of education. for this purpose Some references and deficiencies found in the literature are given below.

In the patent application numbered TR201903936, “Performance Enhancing Quality Management System” is explained. The present invention; strategically targeted and Every organization that plans to make progress according to its strategic plans has the purpose, target and and indicators are recorded regularly and each unit is responsible for which indicators. It is a performance-enhancing quality management system that records the information that it is each assignment of the indicators for which they are responsible to the unit, purpose and target definition processes. After receiving the report consisting of the entered data, the data entered by the unit In order to prevent the error caused by the change of If the data entries are requested for 12 months, the data entry of the relevant period can be entered. it is ensured that it is closed to users, personnel assignment procedures are made to the units, Unit-specific notifications on the main page and menu titles according to authorization status. in the form of tables in line with the period selected in the source of the entered data. analysis using advanced reporting techniques with formulas defined for the indicator It is ensured that the last three data entered are monitored with automatic graphics from the system. a system is considered.

In the patent application numbered TR201911609, “Learning and Program Outcomes A System That Provides Measurement and Evaluation by Reaching” has been explained. The present invention; that can be integrated into student information automation systems in educational institutions. or at the end of the training given in educational institutions, which can be used externally expressing the qualifications and competencies that students should acquire in a particular course It is possible to access the learning outputs online, the student will graduate. the knowledge, skills and competencies to be acquired at the end of the program are defined, These are the exam questions prepared by the instructor, whose printouts can be accessed online. that the questions were matched with the data in the relevant learning output module, that the questions were in multiple choice exams as a result of matching with the data in the learning output module. Question-based success of the students based on the exam result from the optical reader Statistics graphs by comparing the data, which it creates and transfers to the database, were created and these graphics were forwarded to the instructor in the relevant department, education-teaching At the end of the program, a general report was prepared to cover all data, For student or course-based improvements, users are provided with the generated report. A system that offers solutions is discussed.

System and Methods” are explained. The present invention; students' academic various aspects of a training process using training data on performance one or more configured to generate a large number of models to model contains the server. One or more presenters are responsible for the handling of education standards. to evaluate and predict performance measures associated with the educational process, or can use created models and collected data to predict A or more servers, one or more of the educational standards for display calculated measures of how well the client device is addressed, or considered a system that can provide assessments.

Applications related to quality performance management are discussed above. However, this an evaluation by the academic staff during the evaluation period for applications. is out of the question. Such systems do not allow access to an expert and is not open to inspection.

As a result, education and training that can overcome the disadvantages mentioned above between program competencies and course learning outcomes, which increases the quality of a new approach that creates a strong bond and sets standards for the determination of competences. technology is needed.

Description of the Invention: This invention is an education portal based on ahi proficiency, and its features are; educational activities There is a strong link between program qualifications and course learning outcomes, which increases the quality of A new technology that creates and sets standards for the determination of competences is that.

The main purpose of the invention is in the process of raising and developing Turkey's human resources. To design, develop and implement a Learning Management System software that can be used to offer to use. Education and training carried out in higher education institutions with Bulus improve the quality of its activities; program competencies and course learning outcomes to establish a strong bond between is intended to create. In line with this basic purpose, the basis of the invention is The realizations are: - To secure the learning rights of the learners, - To gain ahi-order values based on human virtues in education programs, to build on a sustainable and inclusive understanding, - In determining the program competencies and on behalf of the curriculum, the courses should be standardized. to the benefit of the student in building the structure and gaining the course proficiency. achieve success, - Transparency and supervision in planning and evaluation of educational processes to establish mechanisms in accordance with the principles, - Using the invention subject system, the subjects of each lesson, learning outcomes and to define the gains, to establish the relationship of the subjects with the learning outcomes, - In the course evaluation stage, a measurement and evaluation suitable for the achievements to do and to determine the status of acquiring the competencies of the course, - Natural disaster, epidemic, etc. that can be used in emergencies to prevent disruption of education. Developing a Distance Education Management System, - Sharing files for the subjects and achievements of the courses in the distance education process - Effective communication between students and instructors in the distance education process to enable it to be established, - Competency-based quality assurance system in education applied at the university To ensure integration with external quality assurance systems through accreditation, - The design of education programs is based on national and international standards and values. to shape the field with a competency-based understanding, - In the design, planning and execution of education-training processes Developing the original Ahi Education Quality Assurance System Model to be followed, - A new competency-based model taken as an example at national and international level. to build an accreditation model, Thanks to the above-mentioned objectives, education and training in the higher education system planning, implementation and implementation of activities within the framework of determined standards. can be evaluated; thanks to an auditable and sustainable system It will be possible to increase the quality of higher education institutions.

The subject of the invention is the ahi competency-based education portal education in higher education institutions To ensure that the processes are carried out in accordance with certain standards and to ensure quality in education. It was developed to create an assurance system. Bulus education related planning, implementation and evaluation processes are carried out in accordance with certain standards. it provides.

Acquisition of the competencies envisaged in the system of the invention and in the education systems, measured as learning outcomes. Comply with standards in competency-based education follow-up is provided. Thanks to the developed system, the competencies are arranged in a hierarchical order. determined and all the envisaged achievements serve the program competencies.

Invention based on competency-based education; all educational processes It is carried out through an internet-based learning management system.

The basic principles of the inventive system are as follows: It guarantees the right to learn. It focuses on learning and the all-round development of the student. It is based on student-centered education. It is aimed to gain predetermined competencies.

It is based on the harmony between the program competencies and the learning outcomes of the courses.

It is based on the harmony between the learning outcomes of the courses and the teaching practices.

It is based on the presentation of rich teaching material and interactive teaching environment.

Assessment and evaluation of competencies and learning outcomes of courses based on the use of the model.

It is based on a joint exam for the same course.

It aims at the evaluation and continuous improvement of programs.

Instructors teaching the same course together to gain qualifications. leads to decision-making and collaboration.

It provides standardization in the learning and measurement evaluation of the courses.

Teaching staff working in the same unit in higher education institutions Current curriculum for the courses in higher education programs The invention has a unique structure with many advantages. Advantages of the invention are: In higher education, there is a spiral (holistic) relationship between programmes, curricula and courses. It allows the structure to be established.

All courses in higher education institutions have a standard structure. allows it to be cured.

Support offices established in academic units within the scope of the invention and program adequacy and course learning outcomes thanks to the commissions development with a holistic and interdisciplinary perspective. knows.

It allows to make assessment and evaluation in accordance with the learning outcomes. eliminate subjective evaluations based on employee initiative removes. To determine the extent to which the students have achieved the planned gains. can be achieved.

Administrators, instructors and students are all about education and training. they can follow the processes through the system.

Via common information technologies (computer, tablet and mobile phone) is accessible, Thanks to its ability to be used independently of time and place, education-teaching allows it to be done uninterrupted.

It can be integrated with different video conferencing systems, distance education can be used for the purpose.

Opportunity to create course syllabuses in face-to-face education process gives. As a result of the information defined on it, the Bologna Information Package is automatically can be created.

Data with Student Information Systems used in higher education institutions It allows the sharing of basic data automatically from this system. is updated and constantly updated.

Unlike other learning management systems, it has a competency-based structure. has. Thus, a competency-based hierarchical structure in higher education programs creates specification tables and evaluates the achievement of the targeted competencies. provides monitoring.

Thanks to the invention, students can improve their program competencies, course learning outcomes and being able to foresee the gains, informing about the preparation for the lesson is being done.

An effective communication between the instructor and students through the system can be established.

Competence-based measurement and evaluation are carried out through the system.

- The system can be easily updated according to the needs.

- Long-term storage of the content to be created for the lessons learning material It provides the advantage of creating a pool.

All the advantages of the inventive product are in the diagram given below and making leaps to this scheme. It will be clearer thanks to the detailed explanation written by Evaluation should be made by considering this diagram and detailed explanation. required.

Explanation of Figures: The invention will be described with reference to the accompanying figures so that the features of the invention will be more clearly understood and appreciated, but the purpose of this It's not about limiting yourself with regulations. On the contrary, the invention is satisfied by the appended claims. all alternatives, changes and It is intended to cover the equivalences. Details shown are present invention only shown for illustration of preferred embodiments and both methods formulation, as well as the rules and conceptual features of the invention. and it should be understood that they are presented to provide an easy-to-understand definition. This in drawings; Figure 1 is the schematic view of the modules that make up the subject of the invention.

Figures to assist in understanding this invention are as indicated in the attached picture. are numbered and given below with their names.

Explanation of References: 1. User Management and Authorization Module 2. Curriculum Development Module 3. Content Description Module 4. Measurement and Evaluation Module . Online Course Module 6. Tracking and Polling Module Description of the Invention: Meet; authorization process in the system for each user through the main server. user management and authorization module (1), which is open in the educational institution the basic parameters of all academic units (Institute departments, departments and programs) and the curriculum created for each program. curriculum development module (2), which is automatically transferred to the system via the server, for academic programs, the system's database of program competencies and course where learning outcomes are defined, files for achievements and achievements, information packages are installed, the subject of the lesson, its objectives and resources are defined. The content definition module (3) is the result of the examination made on the system. As a result of the analysis of the answers entered into the database by the processor, the system questions in which item analyzes (difficulty, distinctiveness, etc.) allow questions to be disabled so that they are not reused by administrators. It consists of measurement and evaluation module (4).

Invention's user management and authorization module (1); via main server It is characterized by grouping users and granting collective authorization.

Invention's user management and authorization module (1); different from main server It is characterized by passing authorization for users with privileges.

Measurement and evaluation module (4) of the invention; data over the processor during the active period success analyzes of the class or group determined as a result of performing the analyzes characterized by doing.

Measurement module (4) of the invention; As a result of the analyzes made, the user responsible for exams assigned by the management and authorization module (1) It is characterized by suggesting exam questions to the department.

Measurement and evaluation module (4) of the invention; through the system for teaching staff suitable for the gains of the instructors into the groups categorized for each course. It is characterized by creating a pool of questions by entering questions.

Measurement and evaluation module (4) of the invention; students throughout their education life at graduation by storing all the assessments they've had in the database by performing the reporting process showing the extent to which it has reached the determined competencies. is characterized.

Measurement and evaluation module (4) of the invention; measurement of authorized users for courses As a result of creating an evaluation module (4), it allows the authority to take the exam. is characterized.

Invention's user management and authorization module (1); entered into the system's database data entered to audit all definitions and submit to expert evaluation. It is characterized by transmitting it to the relevant person or persons over the server.

Detailed Description of the Invention: This invention is a Learning Management System used in educational institutions. This system The Learning Management System consists of various modules. Creator of the invention The modules and functions are: 1- User Management and Authorization Module (1): Invention subject system It works on the basis of authorization. Each user by the system administrator authorization can be made. Cancellation or addition of authorization when necessary can be done. Users can be grouped and collective authorization can be given.

Users with different authorizations can easily switch to different authorizations within the system. can do. The table view of the module is as follows.

Your Powers Anabiiim Daii'Program President Unit AYDEP Kooi'cinatorii Böiair' - President dean'iiimur Decanmitidiii Commemorative Young Sekieier Head of System Support Office .Si-318W Regenerator YÖK Evaluation Head of Öçrre Degerierdimie Support Office Student Ogrciin` Eiemoni Head of Ogrelin* Technology Support Office 2- Curriculum Development Module (2) and Content Definition Module (3): One basic parameters of all academic units open in higher education institution (Institute/Faculty Departments, departments and programs in high schools) and each The curriculum created for the program is automatically sent to the system via the server. transfer is provided. Students taking each course are automatically entered into the system. is defined.

Curriculum development module (2) and content of the inventive system identification module (3) provides program competencies and course learning for academic programs. to define outputs, gains and files for gains, information packages allowed to be uploaded, to define the subject, objectives and resources of the course. gives. Example of the identification module (3) where this academic unit data is entered The table view is as below. ' ÇİÇEKDAGl VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 55 On page 11: v ü Chapters Veterinary :1: ComputerTechno oiiieri `2 1: Crop and Animal Production (2 2x Bum Services and Secretarial m Child Care and Youth Services iii'i Accounting and Tax m 6 records showing records 1 r 6 Head of department Ogr Go' ERHAN DURUST Ogr Gar CEVAT FlLIKCI Ogr GO' OZLEM YILMAZ Dr. Member of OGR RAMAZAN YAZICl Number of Majors Ogr GO.' MUHAMMED KOSTEKCE Dr. Lecturer lSMAlL DOGAN Learning outputs entered into the invention subject system Number of Lessons Number of Branches Number of Programs and gains in the system program defined by the user management and authorization module (1) It is submitted to the approval of the development and evaluation support office and relevant field experts. and necessary corrections are made.

A sample Curriculum Development chart based on competency is given below: PROGRAM ROGRAM COMPETENCIES,. _ LESSONS SUBJECTS ME ACQUISITION Proficiency Proficiency OUTPUT â Area Definition Indicator Professional Weekly Learning Top Less than 2 for Information Output A Program Every . At least 3 At least 2 B Lessons For 14 Weeks At least - .

Less than 2 for Skill Output Every Week -› 'Every Attitude and - . Learning Best H At least 3 At least 2 For At least - .

Less than 2 for Value Output In the curriculum development module (2), competency areas were originally created.

Proficiency areas are in the form of Professional Knowledge, Professional Skills, Attitudes and Values, When defining the program competencies, defining the content by choosing the competency area Necessary definitions are made by module (3).

By the curriculum development module (2) and the content definition module (3) The following processes are carried out in the curriculum development process: The instructors giving the course, the experts who will supervise the course, and the students in the system. introducing, By matching the lesson and the instructor, you can choose the subjects of the lesson and the lesson from the instructor. determine the learning outcomes in accordance with the program competencies and the course Entering the gains into the system in accordance with their taxonomic characteristics, Uploading the information package for gains, Instructors' learning outputs and program competencies to create the relevant competence matrix, The expert opinion of the table of specifications prepared by the teaching staff presenting, Course learning information entered into the system by field experts and lecturers Evaluating the outputs and achievements and giving feedback about the deficiencies, In line with the expert opinions, the necessary requirements in the system are determined by the instructor. making corrections, Approval of specification table by experts.

Example table view of the tabs of the curriculum development module (2) on the portal as below: Teaching Eikoku and Writing (203321303) _› Topic 1: Subject Home Acquaintance, presentation of the course and planning of teaching activities. Introducing resources, auxiliary resources and necessary materials.

Examination and evaluation of the sections related to the first literacy teaching of the Turkish Curriculum Dated Home 20t9.

Aims and principles of primary reading and writing teaching; The effects of the features of Turkish on the first reading and writing teaching v Basic Characteristics of first graders` causes of inefficiency-failure in primary reading and writing instruction.

E. tools and materials used in primary reading and writing teaching (properties and effects. selection, creation and use of these tools), v Methods applied in primary reading and writing teaching in our country and in the world (definitions, features, classification. applications, superiority and limitations of methods). v Sound-based sentence method (definition. principles, properties. stages and application); Presentation preparation principles for practice studies.

Sound Based Sentence Method case studies. Examining the activity examples and preparing the activity suitable for the first reading and writing teaching stages.

Presentations and acquaintance with the applications of teaching reading and writing in line with the stages of the sound-based sentence method (1st group chart; teaching e-i-a-k-t-n letter and evaluation). v Presentations and discussion on reading and writing teaching practices in line with the stages of the sound-based sentence method (Group 2; teaching the o-m-u-t-ü-y namer and evaluation).

Presentations and acquaintance with the applications of teaching reading and writing in line with the stages of the sound-based sentence method (3rd Group: Teaching :1 r- i- d- 5- b narts and evaluation).

Presentations and acquaintance with the practices of teaching reading and writing in line with the stages of the sound-based sentence method (Group 4; teaching zıç- g-s-op hait and evaluation).

Presentations and acquaintance with the applications of teaching reading and writing in line with the stages of the sound-based sentence method (teaching and meeting the 5th group n-v-g-f-j naris). evaluation).

General evaluation, presentations and discussion on reading and writing teaching practices in the stages of sound-based sentence method.

Sample table view of tabs belonging to content definition modules (3) on the portal as below: Specification Table Duration: 0 Minutes KHe-delueze Rapziru Karimi Map' 'Gen [luriusuni Box' im 5' W 5' v Getting to know, introducing the course and teaching activities 5 v Explains the information learned about the initial literacy teaching period 5 v The importance of initial literacy teaching (Cognitive-Knowledge) planning) resource' auxiliary resource and can explain how to apply necessary teaching in his life. (Be salmon yellow introducing the materials.

(Number of files Cl) (Reference Number 0) E I' of the students of the first reading and writing teaching as required focuses on how they affect their academic lives. EEliissek Grip] v As required by the primary reading and writing instruction, explains how it affects their academic life (Cognitive-Cognitive) (Question number .0) 3- Measurement and Evaluation Module (4): Using the system that is the subject of the invention, 6 different type (Multiple choice, multiple choice, online written, online oral, performance assignment, objective structured performance exam) can be measured and evaluated. The sample table view of the tabs of the measurement evaluation module (4) is as follows igic'iii Emu- Tui" m 9' iS-i Ciuptiimi: Scrum Nuk! limr ':ku lem km Fi›iJ..\-Irl'fl HH' 'ti-1 «Mr i i &i; \.Li'-.'i\1r› all! "score lrii-r'r-i ,i i iv i EIIWJ'1;:Flr"llwl”'J -: J' 745' -ii-gi `i` imgiiyuwr gr; vr: HI` liii' 2' yrliirilueLH ›' wiiirr LLî'FIi;'.Isrr". bug.`li 'tu-v; v good-i The date for online exams in the system by the assessment and evaluation module (4), time and duration can be determined, the opportunity to change the date and time and increase the duration gives. Automatically reading and scoring online test exams can be done. Uploading assignments for assignment-based assessments, uploaded assignments It is possible to make comments and re-upload files. Assignments and written Rating scales (rubrics) are prepared for the evaluations and accordingly evaluation can be made. Sample table display of exam analysis result as below: Exam QuestionAnaiiz Sinaindi: iemei isiaiisiik (Between) Exam Date: Ü4ii2i202ü Exam Question Analysis Number of students who took the exam: 106 Number of Owned and Senior GiUp Students: 29 EEicei Number of questions: 14 ll Question Question Questionnaire Type of Options Ratio of Questions Questionnaire Acquisition of the First Ritual 1 Asa-gidaverienslatisli pro' Çoktan UsiG. m TuplanUsiiAliG. “WWW!nü Dic'gi.MemberAH-iiiiSAlH Çc-kzor Kuianimamaii Optional 1;' :5 gg cis dd_ SiiiSEK [COÜi ii) '33] Seinseii isaigai 25 iâ li 83 istalsli..uiia'ii i] 3 3- i istansiiii: aiyi'lii Ü i i 2 believes. .nuiainiii 0 i i 2 2 |.Gcîzienndengnzien'eena. Already IJ 516. Sub&TnplnrnÜsilAllG. hmûgmm “nü DiCgiL'yesifiiii'iiiiiSMH Chinese Permit Kuienimaniaii eniniisiii'i Seçnieii t ;5 5.5 [5 (is. SLISEK ii3 00 i i`ll '33] Üieiir i'eiiSet Ü B 5 7 The measurement and evaluation module (4) of the invention also includes homework assignments. It also provides evaluation and entry of grades into the system. Optionally The evaluation results and justifications of the students can also be viewed here.

The system, which is the subject of the invention, is used by students to answer the questions originally used in the exam. The system as a result of analyzing the answers entered in the database on the processor makes item analyzes (difficulty, distinctiveness, etc.) of the questions and allow questions to be disabled so that they are not reused by administrators. gives.

The measurement and evaluation module (4) of the inventive system is processed by the processor. As a result of data analysis, success analyzes of the class can be made. Prepared questions Approval by the Measurement and Evaluation Support Office and the relevant field expert. submitted and accepted with necessary corrections. The measurement and evaluation module (4) is suitable for the acquisitions by the instructors. A question pool consisting of questions is created. Exams to be held in this pool can be created using field questions. Instructor prepares rubrics for assignments, The requirements define the start and end dates and share them with the students.

Monitored in the process of creating and realizing the exams on the system the stages are: a) Measurement and evaluation of course achievements by instructors entering questions for evaluation purposes, b) Exam questions created by the Assessment and Evaluation Commission. sent to designated experts, c) Checking the compatibility of the questions prepared by the experts with the achievements. and giving feedback to the instructor, d) Making the necessary corrections by the instructor and reapproving sending, e) Approval of the exam questions by the experts, f) The exam, which consists of questions approved by the instructors before the exam, identification to the system g) Appointment of an inspector for the examinations, h) Examination on the system at the specified date and time, i) Calculation of the measurement and evaluation module (4) for the questions after the exam The questions that are not suitable are removed from the system through the item analysis. removal.

Competence-based measurement and evaluation module in the inventive system (4) All the evaluations that students are subject to throughout their education life are in the database. showing the degree to which the competencies determined at the graduation stage have been reached by storing provides a proof.

Throughout the academic year, the exams are in the form of electronic exams over the system. If the instructor wishes, the exam can be taken in Word format. can take the printout and apply it in the classroom environment. In electronic exams The instructor can determine the duration of the exam and extend it when necessary.

At the end of the exam, students can see their grades. If requested, students It is ensured that they see the wrong and right in the exam they take. for assignments Which answers were answered by the instructor with the rubric prepared? they can. 4- Online Course Module (5): Web-based video conferencing to the invention subject system live lessons and meetings thanks to the feature of integrating the system Online live lessons and meetings via the system can be created. Thesis defenses, seminar presentations and academic meetings and activities are defined and the participation of authorized persons can be ensured. such as removing the participants from the system, silencing them, giving presentation authorization when requested. transactions can be made. Video or audio participation can be provided in online lessons or activities.

The session authority can send collective or private messages to the participants. Session A file can be created for the decisions or opinions to be taken during the Opinions and suggestions can be written without intervention. When a session authority is required can make changes on the shared notes. Online lecture or meeting During the survey, a survey can be arranged. Authorized unit supervisors You can instantly monitor the progress of the students and take online classes when necessary. can participate. Report on attendance rates to courses held they can create.

- Tracking and Polling Module (6): The system created over the subject of the invention It is possible to receive reports showing the participation status in lessons or other activities.

Information on retrospective courses and students attending can be reached. The reports that can be received in the follow-up and polling module (6): a) Instructors can get attendance report for their own courses. b) Students can see the reports of their attendance. c) Administrators can see course attendance reports. 6- Course Registration and Monitoring Module (7): Recording of online live lectures allows. The recorded lessons are then delivered within the specified time interval. It can be opened for students to watch.

The invention allows the development of all modules and the necessary data updates. gives. Thus, for the courses and programs they are responsible for, the instructors makes it easy for them to make data-based updates.

The system that is the subject of the invention is related to the activities of education and training in higher education processes. some new principles in the design, implementation and evaluation of It includes innovative and functional methods. The new methods brought by the system and this Explanations on the functions of the methods are given below.

System Login Method: Login to the system with the same information as the Student Information System. requires. Instructors' registration numbers and passwords and students Students can log in with their number and password. System login authorization made according to the method.

Authorization Method: Defined tasks screen at the first login to the system The task is selected and the system entry is completed. functions within the system. There are many jurisdictions. Users are authorized according to the action they want to do. You can enter the system by making the selection. empowerment higher education defined in the legal legislation of institutions and existing in student information systems. complies with the mandate. In this context, the administrative hierarchy of academic units appropriate authorizations are available (eg: lecturer, student, department head, department president, dean, director, academic advisor, system administrator, office or commission head etc. have powers).

Description Method: The design, implementation and It allows to make definitions about its evaluation. Describing basic information (academic year, semester, unit, program, curriculum, courses and students and lecturers) automatically from the Student Information System. is being drawn. If necessary, new definitions can be created manually through the system. can be done. Defined time intervals for information in the Student Information System is constantly updated. In addition, updates by the authorities at desired times can be done. Definitions to be made in the system are based on authorization principles. (For example: program qualifications are only available to the Heads of Departments/Divisions) course learning outputs can only be made by the responsible lecturer. can be made by Instructors are responsible for each course they are responsible for. they write the learning outcomes/outcomes and associate them with the relevant program outcomes. Instructors write the 14-week subject list of the relevant course and submit their learning outputs. they relate. Instructors also provide course learning outputs. The associated achievements are based on the target area and target level in Bloom's taxonomy. can enter appropriately. As a result of these definitions, a a table of specifications is formed. Again, the student work of a course by the instructors. load, resources, measurement and evaluation methods and tools, tasks and activities etc. definitions are made. As a result of these definitions Bologna Definitions, which are obligatory in universities, are formed and reported as a report. can be obtained. The Identification Method available in the system is within the scope of Bologna. It not only defines the targeted proficiency expectation, but also implements and It also ensures compatibility with the evaluation processes. teaching staff for the courses they are responsible for, the purpose of the course, resources, files, forums, feedback and can identify their contact information. In terms of process tracking and monitoring of the system An important function of it is to create an assessment and evaluation module (4) for the course. Because the lesson The exam cannot be taken before the measurement and evaluation module (4) is created. Lesson measurement Instructor in terms of measurement and evaluation with the evaluation module (4) they indicate the percentage weights and numbers of the exams they will take. For exam The questions to be determined are determined in a way that is compatible with the learning outcomes of the courses.

These definitions for evaluation purposes have defined the measurement and evaluation system from the beginning of the semester. It is aimed to create and inform students.

Process Tracking and Monitoring Method: Any data/information/task defined to the system can be seen by users in accordance with authorization principles. This With this method, students can determine the subjects of the courses they take, their learning outcomes, and their achievements. and they can see the uploaded resources and files for gains. Moreover The assignments given by the teaching staff, the announcements made, the forms opened have the power to see and watch. Instructor class participation taking attendance, seeing and evaluating the uploaded assignments, feedback so that they can follow They can perform operations such as giving, sharing announcements. Coverage by experts is examined in terms of validity. Online Lesson and Meeting Method: The system is within the scope of distance education activities. It allows various activities to be done. In this context, online courses and meetings can be arranged. Persons authorized to use this method It is possible for them to create a lecture or meeting whenever they want. Integrated into the system online lectures and meetings held with video conferencing software are recorded and allowed to be viewed later. Instant on the system 100 online lectures/meetings can be organized, 200 people per lecture/meeting. can join seamlessly. With this method, video or audio online activities can be done. Collective or individual during online activity messaging, file sharing, presentation authorization, screen sharing can be done. Restricting attendees by admin in online lecture/meetings or authorization to use a function can be granted and/or revoked.

Supervision, Evaluation and Support Method: Guiding the system learning-teaching process It has a structure that removes the critical definitions that give education from the initiative of the instructor.

All definitions made in accordance with the basic principles that guide the creation of the system It is open to inspection and submitted to expert evaluation. In the inventive system The audit and evaluation processes are carried out by the support units.

Within the scope of the definitions related to the instructional processes, all academic support in curriculum development and assessment and evaluation in units commissions were created. Commissions define their jurisdictions and fields. They evaluate and give feedback to the teaching staff through the system.

Support management provides transparency and control of education-teaching processes; It allows development from an interdisciplinary perspective. teaching staff system with the request section on the system administrators about the problems they have experienced. they can get support. In addition, the user's guide about the general features of the system is located.

The implementation of the competency-based education quality assurance system model and this model The portal designed within the scope of the project is as follows for the execution of the learning management system. the listed coordinatorship, support offices and commissions are required. Aforementioned The functions of the coordinator, support offices and commissions are as follows: Quality Assurance System Coordinator in Education: In Education within the Rectorate Quality Assurance System (EKGS) is being established and all other support offices and commissions coordinates. Invention of the Quality Assurance System Coordinator in Education Its duties are as follows: a) To increase the quality of education-teaching processes and practices to carry out planning, implementation, monitoring and improvement studies. b) To develop a competency-based quality assurance system in education. preparing and executing action plans. c) Educational activities to be carried out through formal or distance education In accordance with the principles of Qualification-Based Quality Assurance System in Education to work on the execution of To ensure that units are assigned or authorized.

Coordinating the accreditation processes of the Departments/Programs.

Regarding the execution of education-training activities based on competence develop recommendations Learning for competency-based education in cooperation with UZEM Developing Management Systems and ensuring the dissemination of these systems. Established for the healthy execution of learning management systems coordinating the commission and support offices and their working procedures and determine the fundamentals. For the development of learning management systems, academic related requests, suggestions and complaints from units and other stakeholders. forwarding and following up to coordinators, offices, boards and individuals.

The unit to be established within the scope of the competency-based quality assurance system in education principles determined by the coordinatorships, commission and support offices To ensure the functioning and coordination in line with it.

Decisions taken within the scope of the quality assurance system, the relevant coordinator, support Notifying the office and individuals and following the decisions.

To conduct research on the quality of education and education-teaching processes, and To present the research results to the Rectorate and share them with the relevant units.

Authorized national and international institutions for accreditation of academic programs Communicate with independent international accreditation bodies and Coordinating the necessary information and training activities in the accreditation process Processes for Qualification-Based Quality Assurance System in Education, activity determine plans and performance parameters.

In order to achieve excellence in education and training activities, domestic and international In joint activities with universities and other institutions/organizations outside to be present and develop projects.

Curriculum Support Office: affiliated to the quality assurance system coordinator in education Curriculum support office (MDO) is established and its tasks within the scope of the invention are established. are: Examining the program competencies and curricula of academic units in Turkey report on compliance with the higher education qualifications framework (TYYÇ) Competence-based quality in education for unit managers and instructors assurance system, competency-based education and curriculum development give tutorials. Creating learning outputs and specification tables, program qualifications To prepare a guide on issues related to the creation of the matrix.

Competence-based learning management systems used by the units To carry out the necessary monitoring and guidance work for it to happen. 6) Guidance for curriculum development and evaluation commissions to be established in the units Assessment and Evaluation Support Office: Quality assurance system in education Measurement and Evaluation Support Office (ÖDO) is established under the coordinatorship and their tasks within the scope of the inventive system are: Educational measurement and evaluation processes and processes, proficiency in education in accordance with the principles of quality assurance system based on competency-based education. Developing, applying and evaluating measurement and evaluation tools and techniques scoring, writing questions, preparing rubrics to provide training to the teaching staff. The content and scope of the course, the measurement and evaluation tools and methods, to monitor and develop their suitability for their achievements and learning outcomes. contribute.

Validity, reliability and validity of measurement tools and techniques upon request. To give feedback to the instructors about usability features.

Measurement and evaluation by the quality assurance system coordinator with the faculty members about the decisions and suggestions regarding the to share. f) Compliance and competence with the principles of a competency-based quality assurance system in education unit managers and teaching staff on based assessment and evaluation. Planning and executing trainings for its staff. g) The functioning and application principles of the competency-based measurement and evaluation system, effective and up-to-date approaches and questions about measurement and evaluation processes preparation etc. preparing a guide on the subjects and teaching when necessary to inform staff. h) Measurement and evaluation interface of Learning Management Systems and make recommendations for its functions.

System Support Office: Depending on the quality assurance system coordinator in education The systems support office (SDO) is being established and its tasks within the scope of the invention are: a) To ensure that the learning management systems work smoothly from a technical point of view, to take the necessary precautions together with the relevant person/unit/parties and to ensure coordination. b) For the healthy execution of learning management systems to forward their suggestions to the quality assurance system coordinator. c) Requests, suggestions and suggestions from stakeholders for learning management systems to the person or company officials who developed the software by evaluating the complaints. transmit and follow up. (1) Techniques that may arise in the use of learning management systems to deal with disruptions. e) Instruct students on the use of interfaces of learning management systems. and to prepare written and/or visual guides for teaching staff. f) To increase the usefulness of the interfaces of learning management systems to make the necessary interventions and / or the service from which the software was received To follow up by forwarding it to the supplier/contractor authorities. g) Contractor company for the development of learning management systems quality assurance system on the status of requests forwarded to the authorities to inform the coordinator. Changes and improvements made in the interface of learning management systems relevant stakeholders (students, faculty, support offices, and to inform the coordinators Etc.). Stakeholders (student, teaching staff, examiners, etc.) to provide training.

Accreditation Support Office: affiliated to the quality assurance system coordinator in education An accreditation support office (ADO) is established and its tasks within the scope of the invention are established. are: a) To coordinate the accreditation activities to be carried out for the programs. b) Unit/Division Rules on accreditation bodies and processes to inform and offer advice. c) To prepare activity plans and reports on accreditation studies, and To present it to the quality assurance system coordinator in education. d) Evaluation reports on accredited Departments/Programs by preparing it to the rectorate and to the coordinator of the quality assurance system in education. to present. e) In cooperation with the Unit/Department Accreditation commissions, report to the quality assurance system coordinator in education on activities i) National and international accreditation applications and self-assessment report support in preparation.

Academic Development Support Office: Coordinator of quality assurance system in education depending on the academic development support Office (AGDO) is established and their duties are: Education quality assurance system of teaching staff and related administrative personnel To conduct research on development needs within the scope of Preparing and conducting an academic development program for teaching staff.

Quality Assurance System Coordinator in Unit Education: In academic units unit education quality assurance system coordinator system coordinatorship (BEKGSK) is established and its tasks within the scope of the invention are: Competency-based quality assurance of education-teaching activities in the unit system principles and accreditation processes ensure coordination.

To carry out the educational activities in the unit based on competency. To prepare an annual evaluation report on applications for

Program qualifications of the Department/Department, course learning outcomes and To ensure that the achievements are entered into the learning management system.

Measurables related to the education-training and accreditation processes of the units to determine quality targets and performance indicators related to these targets and ensuring their regular follow-up.

Competence-based quality assurance system and accreditation in education To ensure the coordination of the commissions/boards to be formed in the departments.

On competency-based quality assurance system and accreditation in education Preparing the reports requested by the unit top manager.

Competence-based quality assurance system in education of academic units and To convey their requests for accreditation to the unit managers.

Suggestions for the development of learning management systems used in the unit to present.

For the development of the learning management system used in the unit, requests, suggestions and complaints from academic units and other stakeholders To convey to the relevant commissions, offices, boards and persons and to follow up.

Coordinating the self-assessment studies in the unit, annual unit self-assessment To prepare the evaluation report and at the end of March every year, the university Competence-based quality assurance system and accreditation in education submit it to the coordinator.

Establishing and managing commissions, when necessary, on matters related to his field of duty. The performances of the teaching staff regarding the education-teaching activities. To study and report on evaluation.

Curriculum Development and Evaluation Commission: Conducted in academic units in accordance with the principles of the quality assurance system of education-teaching activities created in each program with students in order to ensure the execution of Curriculum Development and Evaluation Commission (MGDK) is established and the Its duties are as follows: Competence-based quality assurance system and competency-based education programs To ensure that it is developed in accordance with the principles of education. Program qualifications entered into the learning management system, quality assurance to evaluate the system in accordance with its principles and to to inform stakeholders. Course learning information entered into the learning management system by the instructors their outputs to program competencies and competency-based education principles. appoint relevant experts to assess its suitability and provide feedback to the relevant Instructor about the identified nonconformities. have.

Current approaches to program evaluation and development, learning outputs, specification tables, the creation of the program qualifications matrix. To prepare a guide on the issues related to the subject and to inform about these issues arranging meetings.

Preparing reports on curriculum development and teaching staff organize a meeting.

Each year, taking the opinions of students and faculty members, basis to be assessed, added, subtracted, credited, or increased and their suggestions on elective courses to the relevant program executives. to present.

Stakeholders (instructor, student, industry) on the current curriculum representatives etc.) to establish mechanisms to express their views. The curriculum development and evaluation module of the learning management system To notify the system support office about the development requests. Assessment and Evaluation Commission: In academic units, program competencies and To manage measurement and evaluation processes in accordance with course learning outcomes Measurement and Evaluation Commission (ÖDK) is established for the purpose of Its duties are as follows: The measurement and evaluation processes and processes in the program in line with the competency-based quality assurance system and accreditation principles ensure its execution. Competence in education of measurement tools prepared by instructors compliance with the quality assurance system and accreditation principles based on to evaluate. Developing, applying and evaluating measurement and evaluation tools and techniques To support the instructors in the scoring issues. Writing questions for teaching staff, preparing rubrics etc. To support measurement and evaluation activities.

Measurement and evaluation tools and techniques used in the education-teaching process To examine and report validity, reliability and usefulness features.

Validity, reliability and validity of measurement tools and techniques upon request. To give feedback to the instructors about usability features. Functioning of measurement and evaluation system, application principles, measurement assessment processes, question preparation, etc. preparing a guide on the topics and give training. Effective and up-to-date approaches in measurement and evaluation practices to prepare a guide about and, when necessary, inform. Students' objections to the exam questions, their compatibility with the learning outcomes and the answers of the questions to assess structural and structural suitability, and finalize. Regarding the measurement and evaluation module of the Learning Management System to report development requests to the System Support Office.

Accreditation Commission: All programs with students in academic units accreditation in order to carry out the accreditation studies of the programs in one commission (EC) is established and its tasks within the scope of the invention are: a) Activity plans about the accreditation studies carried out in the relevant program, and preparing reports and a competency-based quality assurance system in unit education submit it to the coordinator. b) Carrying out and maintaining the processes and procedures related to the accreditation of the programs. preparing evaluation reports. c) To prepare a report on accreditation issues at least once a year and to teach Organizing a meeting for the staff. d) Relevant program boards about accreditation institutions and processes inform and offer advice. e) Development of the accreditation module of the learning management system to report their requests to the system support office. Learning Management System Officer: Learning management system in all academic units system supervisor (ÖYSS) is appointed and his duties within the scope of the invention are as follows: a) Request, suggestion for the interface of the learning management system used in the unit and to forward their complaints to BKGSK. b) BKGSK about the ongoing and finished works related to its field of duty. inform.

Education quality assurance system based on competency of the subject of the invention The diagram showing the necessary support units for the model is given below: RECTORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EDUCATION COORDINATOR (EKGSK) Curriculum Assessment and System Support Accreditation Academic Support Office Evaluation Office (SDO) Support Office Development Support (MDO) Support Office (ÖDO) (ADO) Office (AGDO) UNITS Units Quality Assurance System Coordinator in Education (BEKGSK) Curriculum Accreditation Learning Management Testing Develop . EC System Responsibility Evaluation Commission (MGK) commission ( ) (ÖYSS) Commission (ÖDEK) The system, which is the subject of the invention, is used in higher education institutions for associate, undergraduate and graduate education. developed for use in programs. In-service training in industry applicable under. The knowledge and information required to be taught in the relevant line of business in the industry skills are entered into the system, allowing employees to receive training and training through this system. evaluation can be made at the end. Also available for administrators whether the training and the competencies aimed to be acquired are acquired by the target audience Feedback is provided about not being won.

Claims (9)

REQUESTS 1- The invention is related to the ahi competency-based education portal that includes the online course module (5), the follow-up and attendance module (6) and the course registration and monitoring module (7). The user management and authorization module (1), where authorization is made for each user in the system over the main server, automatically provides the basic parameters of all open academic units in the educational institution (such as the department, department and programs in the Graduate School/Faculty High Schools) and the curriculum created for each program. The curriculum development module (2), in which the program is transferred to the system via the server, the content definition module (3), in which the program adequacy and course learning outcomes are defined to the database of the system for academic programs, the files and information packages are uploaded for the achievements and achievements, and the subject, objectives and resources of the course are defined through the system. As a result of the analysis of the answers entered by the students into the database as a result of the exam, the system analyzes the items (difficulty, distinctiveness, etc.) of the questions and allows the unsuitable questions to be made passive so that they are not reused by the administrators. It is composed of measurement and evaluation module (4). 2- It is the user management and authorization module (l) mentioned in Claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by grouping users over the main server and giving collective authorization. 3- It is the user management and authorization module (l) mentioned in claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by passing authorization for users with different authorizations through the main server. 4- It is the measurement and evaluation module (4) mentioned in claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by the successful analysis of the class or group determined as a result of performing data analysis on the processor during the active period. 5- It is the measurement and evaluation module (4) mentioned in Claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by suggesting an exam question to the department responsible for the exams assigned by the user management and authorization module (1) as a result of the analyzes made. 6- It is the measurement and evaluation module (4) mentioned in claim 17, and its feature is; It is characterized by the fact that the instructors create a pool of questions by entering the questions appropriate to their achievements into the groups categorized for each course through the system for the instructors. 7- It is the measurement and evaluation module (4) mentioned in Claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by the fact that it stores all the assessments that students have undergone throughout their education life in the database and performs the reporting process that shows the extent to which they have reached the competencies determined at the graduation stage. 8- It is the measurement and evaluation module (4) mentioned in Claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by the fact that authorized users create a measurement and evaluation module (4) for the courses and allow the authorization to take the exam. 9- It is the user management and authorization module (l) mentioned in Claim 1, and its feature is; It is characterized by the fact that the system transmits the entered data to the relevant person or persons over the server in order to control all the definitions entered in the database and submit it to expert evaluation.