TH61125B - Verification of key exchange - Google Patents

Abstract

DC60 Exchanging keys between same level tools is a risk of attack. With people in the midst of attack Verification of the key exchange is made on a different network channel and / or instrument than that of a transponder. Network and / or use tools For a key exchange to determine whether a key exchange is safe or not, a key exchange verification is also established through established and reliable tools and / or entities. Various stakeholders to communicate in the use of Key exchange (multiple times) is announced if required if key exchange is not secure. The stakeholders were announced. And communication was not connected by selection. Exchanging keys between similar tools is a dangerous attack. With people in the midst of attack Verification of the key exchange is made on a different network channel and / or instrument than that of a transponder. Network and / or use tools For a key exchange to determine whether a key exchange is safe or not, a key exchange verification is also established through established and reliable tools and / or entities. Various stakeholders to communicate in the use of Key exchange (multiple times) is announced if required if key exchange is not secure. Stakeholders were announced and communications were not connected through the selection.

Claims (9)

Disclaimer (all) which will not appear on the advertisement page. : What it claims is 1. a system which facilitates the verification of the exchange of the same level of secret keys by It is composed of a receiver component that receives cryptographic key exchange information for key exchanges between same level tools ( peer to peer device) two tools The key exchange is above the first communication method and the verification component is at least above the second communication method. Exchange of secret keys (Cryptographic key exchange) Depend on the people in the midst of attack? 2. The said system of claim 1 means of communication first and least method of communication. Two is one of the trusted third-party tools of network communication. Or a combination of such things 3. The system of claim 1, in addition to the channel variation module, defines the channel used for crypto-key exchange. (cryptographic key exchange) and uses a different channel for verification of a cryptographic key exchange. (cryptographic key exchange verification). 4. The system of claim 1 is supplemented by a specific part, variation, that tool is known. The type of tool used during the exchange of the secret key is used to take advantage of the type of Different tools for the verification of the exchange of keys. (cryptographic key exchange) 5. The system of claim 1 is supplemented by a third party routing module, which provides a validation route for the crypto exchange. (cryptographic key exchange verification) through a trusted third group. 6. The said system of claim 1, the exchange of the aforementioned same level of keys is between the users. Behalf of or above an untrusted network. 7. The said system of claim 1, in addition to the declaration component, provides acknowledgment that the news is delivered. With regard to the same level of tools, the verification of the key exchange is likely someone in the raid. In the middle? 8. The system of claim 7 If the key exchange verification (key exchange verification), there is a tendency for people to attack in the middle of communication between the same level tools. Two tools automatically shut off. 9. Such a system of claim 7 if the verification of the key exchange is likely someone in Attack in between Verification is transmitted to two same-level tools above the means of communication. A second is at least 1. 0. The said system of claim 1, in addition to the declaration component, declares Two of the same tools, whose key exchange is safe if no one is likely In the interstitial attack 1 1. The said system of claim 1 verification component performs the exchange verification. The secret key is enforceable depending on the user request.1 2. Methods for determining whether peer communication exchanges are compromised consists of obtaining a notice of key exchange between the sender apparatus and Receiver tool Deciding how to communicate is used for exchanging such keys and completing different communication methods to examine key exchanges. For the danger of being attacked 1 3. The method of claim 12 At least the means of communication is either a trusted third party network or tool. Or a combination of the aforementioned 1 4. The above method of claim 12 is supplemented by a declaration of acknowledgment of the sender and receiver of the communication. The same level if the exchange of keys compromises by the danger of being attacked 1 5. The above method of claim 14 is supplemented by sending a notice on different means of communication. Many methods 1 6. The above-mentioned method of claim 12 is supplemented by disconnecting communications between the sender tools. With the recipient tool automatically if there is a danger of being attacked in the exchange of such keys 1 7. The above method of claim 12 is supplemented by declaring the acknowledgment of both the sender and the receiver in the Communicate the same level of safety communication if it is found that there is no risk of hurting hazards. Kao in the key exchange 1 8. A compliant computer system provides verification of an automatic key exchange, including a method for obtaining acknowledgment in a key exchange between Two tools of the same level Methods for verifying the exchange of the secret key between the level tools. The same two tools are secured through one tool on the network, one is at least different from Is the network used for exchange? One tool is more different than the one used for. Such exchange Or a trusted third group, or a combination of the aforementioned methods and a method for declaring each user to two same-level tools. Is exchanging secret keys safe? 9. operating computer system As mentioned of Clause 18, additional methods for utilizing one of the common networks are different than those used for the exchange. The tools differ from those used for an exchange or the third group that are trusted to Declare at least 2 of two instruments of the same level instrument. 0. The aforementioned operating computer system of claim 18 is supplemented with communication closures. Automatically if the secret key is not safe