SU900185A1 - Soil phytotoxity determination method - Google Patents
Soil phytotoxity determination method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- SU900185A1 SU900185A1 SU802937051A SU2937051A SU900185A1 SU 900185 A1 SU900185 A1 SU 900185A1 SU 802937051 A SU802937051 A SU 802937051A SU 2937051 A SU2937051 A SU 2937051A SU 900185 A1 SU900185 A1 SU 900185A1
- Authority
- SU
- USSR - Soviet Union
- Prior art keywords
- soil
- phytotoxity
- determination method
- sand
- toxicity
- Prior art date
Links
Landscapes
- Pretreatment Of Seeds And Plants (AREA)
Description
1one
Изобретение относитс к сельскому хоз йс.тву, а именно к определению биодиагностики плодороди почв.The invention relates to agriculture, namely to the determination of bio-diagnostics of soil fertility.
Известно определение фитотоксичности почвы методом агаровых пластинок с целофаном по Красильникову 1.The definition of soil phytotoxicity is known by the method of agar plates with cellophane according to Krasilnikov 1.
Известен также способ определени фитотоксичности почвы, включающий изготовление почвенных пластинок с последующим посевом сем н и измерением ростовых реакций 21.There is also known a method for determining the phytotoxicity of a soil, including the manufacture of soil plates, followed by sowing seeds and measuring growth reactions 21.
Недостатки известных способов недостаточный доступ кислорода к семени , вдавленному в увлажненную пластинку , заростание пластинки и сем н плесневыми грибами, непосредственный контакт сем н с патогенными и условно патогенными микроорганизмами , что существенно вли ет на результаты анализа по определению фитотоксичности почвы.The disadvantages of the known methods are insufficient access of oxygen to the seed pressed into the moistened plate, the overgrowth of the plate and seeds by mold fungi, direct contact of the seeds with pathogenic and conditionally pathogenic microorganisms, which significantly affects the results of soil phytotoxicity analysis.
Цель изобретени - повышение точности определени .The purpose of the invention is to improve the accuracy of determination.
Поставленна цель достигаетс тем, что почвенную пластинку переувлажн ют, нанос т слой сухого стерильного песка и выдерживают в течение 20-30 ч.The goal is achieved by over-wetting the soil plate, applying a layer of dry, sterile sand and incubating for 20-30 hours.
Пример 1. Поставлен лабораторный опыт определени токсичности чернозема выи(елоченного под монокультурой сахарной свеклы к просу. Образцы почвы отобраны в опытном Example 1. Laboratory experience was established to determine the toxicity of chernozem of the soil (eaten under a sugar beet monoculture to millet. Soil samples were collected in the experimental
10 хоз йстве института.10 host institute.
Дл определени токсичности, почвы необходимо переувлажнить испытуемый образец до сметанообразного состо ни и. распределить его в чашIS ки Петри, добива сь равной поверхности с помощью металлического шпател . Затем на почвенную пластинку наноситс слой сухого стерильного песка, толщиной 0,+-0,6 см, предва20 рительно промытого в воде. Почвенна пластинка с песком компостируетс ч при комнатной темпера туре дл дифундировани фитотоксинов в песок. Влажность испытуемого образца почвы с песком перед посевом сем н должна быть сбалансир аана в пределах 70-80% от полной влагоемкости. Предварительно дл каждого типа испытуемых почв экспериментально ус танавливаетс полна влагоемкость и расчетным путем устанавливаетс необходимое количество воды дл доведени образца почвы до полной влагоемкости. Во всех испытуемых .образцах вес почвы в чашках Петри, а также слой нанесенного песка, дол ны быть одинаковыми. Вес почвы и песка устанавливают в зависимости о диаметра и высоты чашки Петри, Кром чашки Петри опыты можно проводить в кюветах дл определени всхожести сем н, примен емых контрольно семенными инспекци ми, которые необ ходимо закрывать сверху стеклом. Контролем служит стерильный песо увлажненный до 70-80 от полной влагоемкости. Посев сем н проводитс в песок путем вдавливани их на половину своей толщины. 1роращивают семена при . Учет проросших сем н ведетс на третьи сутки. По р ности всхожести сем н на контроле To determine the toxicity of the soil, it is necessary to rewet the test sample to a creamy state and. distribute it in a bowl of Petri ki, to achieve an equal surface using a metal spatula. Then, a layer of dry, sterile sand, 0, + - 0.6 cm thick, preliminarily washed in water, is applied to the soil plate. A soil plate with sand is composted at room temperature to diffuse phytotoxins into sand. The humidity of the test sample of the soil with sand before sowing seeds should be balanced with aan within 70-80% of full capacity. Previously, for each type of tested soil, the full capacity is experimentally established and the required amount of water is calculated by calculation to bring the soil sample to full capacity. In all the test specimens, the weight of the soil in Petri dishes, as well as the layer of applied sand, should be the same. The weight of the soil and sand is established depending on the diameter and height of the Petri dish. Krom Petri dish experiments can be carried out in cuvettes to determine seed germination, used by seed control inspections, which need to be covered with glass on top. The control is a sterile peso moistened to 70-80 of full capacity. Sowing seeds is carried out in the sand by pressing them down to half their thickness. Grow seeds at. Accounting for sprouted seeds is kept on the third day. According to the seed germination rate under control
Таблица 1 4 и испытуемом образце суд т о степени токсичности почвы. Результаты сравнени известного и предлагаемого способов определени фитотоксичности почвы представлены в табл.1. П р и м е р 2. Результаты опыта по определению токсичности чернозема выщелоченного к сахарной свекле под бе с смен найми посевами привод тс в табл.2. Опыт проводилс согласно методике описанной в примере 1. Как видно из табл. 1 и 2, предлагаемый способ точнее известного за счет сближени опытных вариантов и контрол по физическим показател м . Пример расчета токсичности почвы . Взошло сем н проса на контроле 85% (85 сем н из ЮО), что принимаетс за 1001, а всхожесть на опытном варианте - за х. контроль 85-100% опыт 21-х X 25%. Токсичность почвы или процент ингибировани всхожести равен 100-25 75.Table 1-4 and the sample to be tested judge the degree of soil toxicity. The results of the comparison of the known and proposed methods for determining the phytotoxicity of the soil are presented in Table 1. EXAMPLE 2: The results of the experiment to determine the toxicity of leached chernozem to sugar beets under seed shifts by hiring the crops are given in Table 2. The experiment was carried out according to the procedure described in Example 1. As can be seen from the table. 1 and 2, the proposed method is more precisely known due to the convergence of experimental variants and the control by physical indicators. An example of the calculation of soil toxicity. The seed of millet on control was 85% (85 seeds from SO), which is taken as 1001, and the germination rate on the experimental variant is x. control 85-100% experience 21 x 25%. Soil toxicity or percent inhibition of germination is 100-25 75.
сем нД this nd
80 82 88 8880 82 88 88
Среднее, %85Average,% 85
Токсичность почвы,5j Примечание . НСР,„ дл опыта 11,3%.Soil toxicity, 5j Note. HCP, „for experience 11.3%.
17 16 20 3017 16 20 30
77 66 80 6077 66 80 60
71 1671 16
21 7521 75
Всхожесть сем н,Seed germination,
1one
22
33
kk
Среднее, % Токсичность, %Average,% Toxicity,%
Примечание. НСР,,„, дл опыта 3,9Note. NDS ,, „, for experience 3.9
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SU802937051A SU900185A1 (en) | 1980-03-17 | 1980-03-17 | Soil phytotoxity determination method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SU802937051A SU900185A1 (en) | 1980-03-17 | 1980-03-17 | Soil phytotoxity determination method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
SU900185A1 true SU900185A1 (en) | 1982-01-23 |
Family
ID=20900677
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
SU802937051A SU900185A1 (en) | 1980-03-17 | 1980-03-17 | Soil phytotoxity determination method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
SU (1) | SU900185A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1997012241A1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1997-04-03 | Gff | Method and biotest kit for characterizing a plant-production substrate |
-
1980
- 1980-03-17 SU SU802937051A patent/SU900185A1/en active
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1997012241A1 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1997-04-03 | Gff | Method and biotest kit for characterizing a plant-production substrate |
CH689464A5 (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1999-04-30 | Jacques Fuchs | Characterisation of plant growth substrates |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Samuel et al. | The infected root‐hair count for estimating the activity of Plasmodiophora brassicae Woron. in the soil | |
Martens | Contribution of rhizodeposits to the maintenance and growth of soil microbial biomass | |
Brown et al. | The germination of the seed of Striga lutea: I. Host influence and the progress of germination | |
MOCTEZUMA | Changes in auxin patterns in developing gynophores of the peanut plant (Arachis hypogaea L.) | |
Gueye et al. | Acquisition of callogenic capacity in date palm leaf tissues in response to 2, 4-D treatment | |
Zilkah et al. | Cell cultures vs. whole plants for measuring phytotoxicity I. The establishment and growth of callus and suspension cultures; definition of factors affecting toxicity on calli | |
Macfarlane | A solution-culture technique for obtaining root-hair, or primary, infection by Plasmodiophora brassicae | |
SU900185A1 (en) | Soil phytotoxity determination method | |
CN102172128B (en) | Method for biologically testing chemoreception potential of plant root system secretions | |
Burrage | Environmental factors influencing the infection of wheat by Puccinia graminis | |
Mian et al. | The onset of nitrogen fixation in young alder plants and its relation to differentiation in the nodular endophyte | |
Weinberger et al. | The effect of sonication on the growth of some tree seeds | |
Hart et al. | An apparatus for determining the effects of temperature and humidity on germination of fungous spores | |
CN100394182C (en) | Method for measuring virulence of bactericide to bacterium of downy mildew of cucumber | |
Bradbeer et al. | Seed viability and vigour | |
Herder-Brouwer | The development of periphyton on artificial substrates | |
Wrba et al. | The action of serum from partially hepatectomized rats on explants of liver and tumors | |
Wang et al. | Tomato stem injection for the precise assessment of Ralstonia solanacearum fitness in planta | |
Garrard | The effects of β-indolylacetic acid on the germination and root growth of certain members of the cruciferae | |
SU947761A1 (en) | Soil fertility determination method | |
SU1139389A1 (en) | Method of estimating stability of pepper varieties to verticilliaceous wilt | |
SU1061719A1 (en) | Method of determining the quality of winter rye seeds | |
Horodecka | Laboratory methods of evaluating tomato resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary) | |
Hof | Inhibition of mitosis in Pisum root meristems by continuous gamma radiation: The influence of temperature on the synthesis of DNA, RNA and protein during inhibition | |
RU2379686C2 (en) | Method of biological fluid analysis for concentration of benzylpenicillin preparations |