RU2148278C1 - Power generation process and power plant implementing it - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: power engineering. SUBSTANCE: energy source is hydrogen in which maximum quantity of molecules are in orthoform. Such hydrogen is used to produce pellets which are cooled down to temperature approaching absolute zero and spin-polarized. Then they are conveyed to reaction chamber core and bombarded by slightly focused beams of polarized protons and electrons of minimal possible size in direction of their motion; electrons and protons are polarized in same way as in hydrogen pellets and their motion towards axes of their revolution is ensured. Beam particles are arranged so that their axes of revolution are parallel to those of protons and electrons in pellets and then they are accelerated. When electrons are used, they can be polarized in opposition to those in hydrogen pellets at the same time ensuring that they move perpendicular to axes of revolution of electrons in pellets. During collision of beam particles with pellet particles the latter are destroyed which is accompanied by energy release. Process is implemented in plant that has desired units for initiating, conducting and controlling the reaction. Desired energy is produced from hydrogen pellets. EFFECT: improved efficiency and environmental friendliness of process and plant. 5 cl, 33 dwg

Description

 The invention relates to energy and can be used to create highly efficient power plants.

As you know, it is currently believed that the total energy of any body E _p ("elementary" particle, atomic nucleus, atom, molecule, crystal, macro-object, etc.) consists of two parts: passive (hidden) rest energy E ₀ , most of which does not manifest itself under ordinary conditions, and the active kinetic energy E _k , which can be easily used for practical purposes, i.e. what
E _p = E ₀ + E _to . (1)
According to the law of conservation of energy (in its modern concept), the total energy of any material object remains unchanged in any process, however, this law does not prohibit the conversion of energy from one form to another. In principle, both the process of converting rest energy into kinetic energy and the inverse process of converting kinetic energy into rest energy are possible. In accordance with the ratio
E _p = Mc ² , (2)
where E _p is the total energy;
M is the rest mass of the object;
c is the speed of light in the "physical vacuum",
the first process should be accompanied by a decrease in mass ("conversion of mass into kinetic energy"), and the second - by an increase in mass ("conversion of kinetic energy into mass").

In this regard, the most promising (from the point of view of maximum energy extraction from matter) seems to be the process of complete conversion of the rest energy of subatomic particles to another form of energy (for example, into rest energy and kinetic energy of lighter microobjects formed in this process). According to relation (2), the mass of one gram of any substance is equivalent to the rest energy of 9 • 10 ²⁰ erg, or 9 • 10 ¹³ J, which is almost 1000 times more energy released when one gram of uranium decays in a nuclear reactor. The discovery in the middle of the current century of micro-objects that differ from previously discovered subatomic particles only in terms of signs of electric charges and magnetic moments, i.e. positrons, antiprotons, and antineutrons, as well as the knowledge that microobjects with opposite electric charges are mutually attracted to each other (in accordance with Coulomb's law), prompted specialists to come up with proposals for organizing the annihilation process and generating energy for this. In physics, the term "annihilation" (literally meaning disappearance, turning into nothing) is used to refer to a process in which a particle and its corresponding antiparticle are converted into electromagnetic radiation - photons or other particles - quanta of a physical field of a different nature than for the corresponding initial particles. Moreover, as is now believed, the law of conservation of electric charge must be observed (along with other fundamental laws of conservation), that is, only the corresponding pairs of particles and antiparticles can disappear or be born. For example, upon collision of an electron (e ^- ) and its antiparticle - positron (e ⁺ ), both of them can disappear, forming two photons (γ-quanta). At sufficiently high energies, an electron-positron pair can turn into a collection of heavy particles - hadrons, which include protons and neutrons. In turn, the collision of a proton and an antiproton often leads to their mutual annihilation, which is accompanied by the appearance of several much lighter particles — pi mesons and (less commonly) K mesons. Thus, this is not about the destruction or spontaneous occurrence of matter, but only about the interconversion of particles.

So far, the processes of annihilation of electrons and protons at their meeting with their antiparticles have been carried out only in accelerators. Particularly effective are accelerators with colliding beams in which subatomic particles and their corresponding antiparticles move under the influence of electric and magnetic fields in opposite directions in almost circular orbits. At the point of intersection of the orbits, annihilation of a small number of particles and antiparticles takes place. However, it is not possible to use these processes as an energy source, since to create the conditions under which they can occur, one has to expend immeasurably more energy than it is released during annihilation. Huge energy is needed for the artificial production of antiparticles in laboratory conditions, their accumulation and storage, as well as for the acceleration of particles and antiparticles and the formation of trajectories of their motion. In particular, for the accumulation and storage of antiparticles, special rather complex devices called storage rings are used. In such installations, antiparticles are "stored" in a state of motion at a speed close to the speed of light, inside large annular evacuated chambers placed in a strong magnetic field. The radius of these giant rings is tens and hundreds of meters, and the total number of antiparticles circulating in them is negligible. To store the same amount of substance under ordinary conditions, a volume of many orders of magnitude less than 1 cm ^{3 is} sufficient.

Particular attention should be paid to the fact that only a very small number of particles and antiparticles from colliding beams annihilate in the accelerators under consideration. This is due to the relatively low density of microobjects in the beams and the short penetration time of particles of one beam moving at a high speed through the oncoming beam, and, consequently, to the extremely low probability of mutual collision of particles and antiparticles. At the same time, the energy spent on obtaining, accumulating, storing, accelerating, etc. "unreacted" microobjects will be completely lost. The efficiency of the process under consideration (as an energy source) could be increased if it were possible to focus the beams to densities close to the densities of the “packing” of subatomic particles in solids. This is a thousand times greater than the density of focused beams at one of the most modern accelerators of "elementary" particles - the Stanford linear collider operating on colliding beams of electrons and positrons. Is it possible to expect that in the future it will be possible to achieve the required density of microobjects in colliding beams? P. Valoshek writes the following about this:
“It’s easy to go into the field of scientific fiction. Already during acceleration in LINAC, the final beam sizes should be taken into account. Focusing magnets (quadrupoles) with a hole of a few tenths of a millimeter are used at the interaction point. They must be aligned with the same accuracy and maintain a stable position within the millionth fractions of a millimeter. We are approaching the limits of the possible: errors should not exceed one thousandth of a millimeter. Clots of particles should not be longer than about a tenth of a millimeter. tionary increasing frequencies must be more strictly hold sheaves on the accelerator axis "(P. Valoshek journey into the interior of matter. C HERA to the boundaries of cognition. Moscow," Mir ", 1995, p. 238). The applicant is not aware of other proposals for the extraction of energy from subatomic particles due to the destruction of the latter.

 The closest analogue of the proposed method for obtaining energy from matter in terms of preparatory operations for organizing the process is a method for producing nuclear energy through the synthesis of heavier atomic nuclei from lighter nuclei and individual nucleons, described in patent GB 795596 A (IPC G 21, published on 28.05. 58).

 It proposed a system for producing usable nuclear energy, consisting of appropriate sources of nucleons, i.e. neutrons or protons, and other (secondary) reacting particles, selected in such a way that the fusion reaction between them leads to the formation of at least one particle with a decrease in mass and a corresponding release of energy. Secondary and newly formed particles are understood to mean not only nucleons, but also atomic nuclei or compound particles, such as deuterium, tritium, helium and other atomic nuclei. In this system, the first means for magnetic polarization of the interacting particles and the second means for guiding these particles along the paths of approach, i.e. in the direction to each other in the reaction zone, and the directions of polarization and trajectories are chosen in such a way in relation to each other that these particles tend to occupy relative positions in the reaction zone, in which their magnetic moments create maximum attractive forces between the primary and secondary particles, providing their merger, i.e. the formation of practically stable final particles.

 Such a system provides for various combinations of the directions of polarization of interacting particles, including the direction common to them. In this case, the particle motion paths, caused by the means of guidance, can be either parallel to the indicated general direction of polarization or perpendicular to it.

 In the case of using neutrons as primary particles to increase the cross section of the beam they form, which, as is known from nuclear physics, increases the likelihood of their meeting and reacting with other particles, neutrons are slowed down in various ways, including by cooling to acceptable low temperatures.

Despite the fact that more than forty years have passed since the issuance of the aforementioned patent, the proposed system for producing usable nuclear energy has not yet been implemented, i.e. The expected technical result was not obtained. The main reason for this is, as mentioned earlier, the extremely low probability of approaching in colliding beams of polarized particles to distances comparable to the sizes of the latter. As you know, the scope of nuclear forces, including those due to magnetic moments, is negligible. The radius of their action is approximately equal to (1-2) • 10 ^-13 cm.

 Partially, this drawback is eliminated in the device for igniting hydrogen tablets to initiate a thermonuclear reaction by circulating ion current (Germany, application N DE 3742327 A1, IPC-4 G 21 B 1/02, published June 22, 89), which is an analogue of the inventive installation for implementing the proposed production method energy.

 In this device, the initiation of a thermonuclear reaction is provided by firing tablets of a spherical or other shape from liquid or frozen hydrogen, or heavy water, or another material suitable for a thermonuclear reaction. A distinctive feature of this application is that the ignition is carried out by reagent ions, which under the influence of a predominantly magnetic field circulate along a closed curve, penetrating into the tablet.

 According to the applicant, the above device will also not allow to obtain the required technical result, i.e. will not provide ignition of tablets containing material suitable for a thermonuclear reaction.

 The author of this application mistakenly believes that in order to create the conditions necessary for the thermonuclear reaction in the tablet as a whole, it is sufficient to ensure the collision of a relatively small number of high-speed ions from their beam circulating under the influence of a predominantly magnetic field with deuterons that are part of the molecules, for example, liquid or frozen heavy water.

 According to modern concepts (see, for example, J. Orir, Physics. T. 2. M., Mir, 1981, pp. 544-545), for organizing effective, i.e. energetically and economically advantageous reaction of helium synthesis in tablets with thermonuclear fuel, it is necessary to ensure high temperature not in their local zones, but in the whole volume. To do this, send highly focused beams of high-energy microobjects from different sides to the tablet, which naturally penetrate deep into the structure of the tablet. The required sufficiently dense focusing of identically electrically charged particles is, as mentioned earlier, if not feasible in principle, then at least difficult to achieve, including due to the mutual Coulomb repulsion of homogeneous microobjects in the beam.

 The reasons for the fact that, in principle, the correct ideas about the possibility of obtaining an almost unlimited amount of energy due to the synthesis of relatively heavy atomic nuclei from lighter ones and due to the destruction of subatomic particles have not yet been found practical application, are not only technical difficulties, but also (mainly ) ignorance of the fundamental properties of matter, structure and nature of the parameters of the objects of the microworld.

 Natural scientists have not yet been able to know what mass and energy are, what the nature of electromagnetic fields is, and what determines the forces of the four considered fundamental interactions.

 While he is not aware of the structure of "elementary" particles and those underlying processes that determine the parameters of micro-objects: their electric charges, magnetic moments and spins. Without understanding the essence of such concepts as mass and energy, without creating models of micro-objects that correspond to the realities of the material world, without clarifying the nature of their parameters, it is hardly possible to find ways to efficiently extract energy from matter, in particular by destroying subatomic particles.

Before proceeding to the description of the essence of the invention, it is necessary to state those ideas about the microworld on which it is based. The presentation of these representations is accompanied by a number of drawings. In FIG. 1, 2, 3, and 4 schematically show the changes in volumes (a) and apparent total magnetism (h) of those indivisible and indestructible particles of matter, hereinafter called gravitons, which underlie the universe, and in FIG. 5 and 6 - changes in the apparent total magnetism and its excess component (Δh) in gravitons during their unilateral deformation. In FIG. 7 shows a microbunch of gravitons when viewed from the side, FIG. 8 is a cross section of a core of a bunch of gravitons and changes in the apparent total magnetism (h) and its excess component (Δh) for that group of gravitons, which is numbered in Arabic numerals, and in FIG. 9 is a view of one of the hemispheres of a core of a bunch of gravitons and changes in the apparent total magnetism (h) and its excess component (Δh) for gravitons in the process of their movement from the core pole to its "equator". In FIG. 10 shows the nature of the change in the latitudinal component (H _Σ ) of the magnetic field generated by the core of a bunch of gravitons when viewed from the side, as well as the dipole component of this field (H _c ), in FIG. 11 - change in the latitudinal component strength (h) and polarity (Δh) when viewed from the top of a bunch of gravitons. In FIG. 12 shows zones of the ether surrounding the proton that “carry” electric charges of different signs, and in FIG. 13 - neutron charged zones. In FIG. Figure 14 shows a change in the latitude and magnetic polarity of sunspots during successive cycles of solar activity. In FIG. 15 graphically shows changes in the parameters of graviton microbunches depending on external conditions and on the speed of their translational motion. In FIG. 16, existing ideas about changes in the microscopic cross sections of nuclides depending on the neutron velocity are illustrated, and FIG. 17 is what takes place in reality. In FIG. 18 shows a particle and an antiparticle. In FIG. 19 is a plan view of a nuclear helix of a copper atom. In FIG. 20 illustrates the process of self-transformation of an antiparticle into an ordinary particle. In FIG. 21 shows the gravitational interaction of an electron with a proton in the case when the distance between micro-objects is many times greater than their own dimensions, and in FIG. 22 is the same for the case when the distance between the electron and the proton is commensurate with their size. In FIG. 23 shows the change in size (a), apparent total magnetism (h) and its excess component (Δh) of gravitons in the process of their movement to graviton bunches. In FIG. 24 shows the electromagnetic interaction of a proton and an electron in the case when the distance between them is many times greater than their own dimensions, and in FIG. 25 is the same for the case when the distance between subatomic particles is commensurate with their size. In FIG. 26 shows a model of a hydrogen atom, and FIG. 27 - hydrogen orthomodification molecules. In FIG. Figure 28 shows the overlapping of the uncharged zones of protons and "antiprotons" during the approach of microobjects.

The entire material world consists of extremely small (in mass as a measure of the matter contained in them) structureless particles - gravitons. According to estimates, the mass of the graviton, which does not change under any conditions, is in the range of 10 ^-42 - 10 ^-45 g. These irreplaceable and indestructible particles are elements of all clumps of gravitons, including "elementary" particles, and also form the ubiquitous ether ("physical vacuum"), i.e. fill, though without gaps, the entire space of the universe. In other words, gravitons are represented as elements of continuous substance, which is the cause and basis of the vast variety of systems existing in nature and their properties and provides the interconnection of everything in an infinite Universe.

 Purely conditionally, gravitons can be represented in the form of peculiar magnetic dipoles, one half of which is filled with “northern” magnetic monopoles, and the other is “southern”, as schematically shown in FIG. 1.

 The peculiarity of gravitons is that depending on the external conditions, and more precisely, on the density of the "packing" of gravitons in a particular volume of space or on the speed of their movement relative to the "permeated" ether, they change their volume in significant limits calculated by many orders of magnitude (and ), and therefore, its apparent total magnetism - h (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4). “It seems” because, relatively speaking, the number of magnetic monopoles enclosed in the graviton remains constant, and only the distance between them changes. Gravitons are the material basis of electromagnetic fields.

 From what has been said, it follows that in graviton bunches, for example, in an electron or proton, the density of the “packing” of primordial particles of matter is relatively high (moreover, the higher the mass of the bunch) and their own magnetic fields have a relatively high intensity, while in ether the volume of gravitons is many orders of magnitude greater, and their apparent total magnetism and the intensity of the magnetic fields they create are many times smaller.

 When the graviton deforms unevenly, it more or less shows an uncompensated "part" of its apparent magnetism (Δh), as shown schematically in FIG. 5 and 6. If, for example, the graviton has a volume of the “northern” part that is half that of the “southern” part, then the apparent “northern” magnetism will be as many times larger.

 The interaction of gravitons, which is truly fundamental, consists in their attraction and repulsion. A peculiar model of this interaction can be the behavior of two cubes, which are permanent magnets, with their different relative positions. Ultimately, all those interactions that are currently considered fundamental, i.e., can be reduced to this gravitomagnetic interaction. strong, electromagnetic, weak and gravitational. The main form of the relative motion of gravitons is the approximation and removal of their "centers of mass", and its own - compression and expansion.

 The main form of the existence of matter in the material state is graviton bunches, which form the widest range of objects of the material world of various sizes and masses (as they are contained in bunches of gravitons), starting with photons, γ-quanta and "elementary" particles and ending with the nuclei of planets, stars and the nuclei of galaxies. The fact is that at a certain stage of the "life" of celestial bodies, in particular stars and planets, in their central regions macrobunches of gravitons are formed, which, with the aging of mega-objects, constantly increase in size, turning into a mega-bunch. As will be shown below, in the central regions of the Sun and the Earth, such megalots of gravitons are already present, representing the nuclei of these celestial bodies. As for the nuclei of galaxies, from these colossal masses of graviton bunches neutrons are constantly thrown into the surrounding space, some of which later decay into protons and electrons. Subatomic particles that are born in the central regions of galaxies are the “building material” for the atoms of all chemical elements that subsequently “contract” into stars or fly off into interstellar space.

 All clumps of gravitons, in particular “elementary” particles, have a core, which for clarity can be represented as a droplet of an extremely dense graviton “liquid”, and a surrounding “core” coat, which in turn consists of the smallest graviton droplets, as well as individual gravitons having intermediate sizes between core elements and adjacent to the "fur coat" layers of ether (Fig. 7).

 The "fur coat" of a micro-object can be likened to a dense steam shell of a core. For a figurative representation of the shape of this “fur coat” and the nature of the motion of the graviton microdroplets indicated above, one can resort to a peculiar megamodel — the Earth’s radiation belts, the presence of which on our planet is due to the existence of a graviton core in its center.

 Any bunch of gravitons, which is a magnetic dipole, i.e. having, as shown in FIG. 7, the north and south poles, constantly interacts with the surrounding ether and exchanges gravitons with it. The absorption of gravitons from the ether, as well as microdrops from the “coat”, occurs through the polar zones of the core, and their release through its “equatorial” regions (see Fig. 7). It is this process that determines the relentless rotation of graviton microbunches, which is called the "spin". Incidentally, the same process also determines the rotation of celestial bodies around their axes, which has not yet been explained.

 Cores of different-sized clumps of primordial particles of matter are formed by four closely related peculiar vortices — solitons of the graviton “fluid”, two of which form the “northern” hemispheres of the cores, and the other two are “southern”. The desire to present in this application his ideas about the microworld in a concise form limits the author in a detailed description of why he believes that the cores of graviton bunches consist of four soliton vortices. Briefly, it can be said that this was the only way he was able to compose a viable "construction" from the smallest possible number of these vortices.

 One of the distinguishing features of these solitons is that they are like a mirror image of ordinary vortices, i.e. look like not "funnels", but "bells". Another feature is that, in contrast to ordinary vortices, which usually have a circular cross section, core solitons are deformed to a semicircle in a similar cross section, as shown in FIG. 8, which schematically depicts one of the latitudinal sections of the core.

 The groups of gravitons that are part of the indicated vortex-solitons constantly perform complex trajectory (spiral) movement within them: in vertical planes they move from the poles to the "equator", and in semicircles of horizontal planes they move from the center of the core to the periphery, along half its perimeter and back to the center (see Fig. 8). The volume of gravitons, and consequently, their apparent total magnetism and its excess component during the motion of the primordial “bricks” in core solitons are constantly changing. In meridional planes, as gravitons move from the poles to the "equator" of the core, their volume increases, and the apparent total magnetism and its excess component decrease, as shown schematically in FIG. 9, which shows one of the core hemispheres, while in latitudinal planes this change is, as can be seen from FIG. 8, more complex. In particular, those gravitons that form the surface layers of the core twice change the magnitude of their total magnetism, and its excess component changes its polarity four times.

As follows from FIG. 8, 9, the maximum magnetism of the cores of graviton bunches takes place in their polar regions, and in each of the hemispheres of this kind of material objects there are two poles of the same name located close to each other, while the opposite pair of poles also has the opposite polarity. The gravitons following to the core of the graviton bunch, carried away by it in rotational motion, are constantly decreasing in volume, are increasingly manifesting one or another component of their excess magnetism and, due to this, form an electromagnetic field in the ether surrounding the microbunch of gravitons, which can conditionally be divided into two constituents: dipole (H _c ) and latitudinal (H _Σ ), as shown in FIG. 10. Since the structure of the latitudinal component of this field is determined by the interaction of ether gravitons with the same counterparts that form the surface layers of the core, the nature of the change in the intensity and polarity of the latitudinal component of this field in its cross section looks like that shown in FIG. 11. It should be noted that the polarity of the dipole component of the field in question (H _c ) is opposite to the polarity of the core itself. This is due to the fact that gravitons moving, say, to the north poles of the core, constantly decrease to a greater extent the part that is filled with "southern" monopoles, while the meridional motion of gravitons in core solitons forming its "northern" hemisphere begins provisions in which the part of microdipoles that is filled with "northern" monopolies is maximally deformed. The dipole nature of graviton bunches determines the magnetic moments inherent in each of them and allows, if necessary, to orient microobjects in the right direction by superimposing the corresponding external electromagnetic fields at their location.

 The combination of the peculiar orientation of gravitons in the ether surrounding their particular bunch, the degree of their deformation, including one-sided, is currently perceived as an electric charge of micro-objects.

If we could look at the core of a particular bunch of gravitons from the side, we could see that in each of its hemispheres there are two crescent-shaped depressions (places M ₁ and M ₂ in Fig. 8), going from the "equator" to the poles core, as schematically shown by lines L in FIG. 9 and 10.

The crescent shape of these depressions is due to the fact that the torque (K ₁ - K ₂ in Fig. 8), formed due to the ejection of droplets of gravitons from the "equatorial" core regions, is transmitted to their polar regions due to the fundamental interaction mentioned above.

The force of this interaction, which plays the role of the friction force familiar to solid-state disks, is created when the gravitons of one core layer are shifted relative to their counterparts in adjacent layers by a half-step (see line L in Fig. 9). This force reaches its maximum value when the microdipoles of one core layer are rotated 180 ^° with respect to the microdipoles of neighboring layers.

 In this regard, the orientation of gravitons in each of the four core solitons can change as they move from the poles to the "equator". So, for example, if in the solitons of a core of a relatively light electron, the polarity of gravitons remains unchanged throughout their movement, i.e. To transfer torque from the “equatorial” core layers of this subatomic particle to its poles, it is enough to shift the microdipoles by a half-step, then in core solitons of a heavier proton it changes to the opposite in the regions adjacent to the “equator”. In the solitons of the core of an even heavier neutron, the polarity of gravitons changes twice, so that the polar and "equatorial" regions of this micro-object are separated by intermediate regions with a different orientation of its elements - dipoles. It follows that, using the current terminology, the electron has only a negative electric charge, and the proton has zones with both a positive (predominant peripheral) electric charge and a negative internal one (Fig. 12). The neutron is surrounded by three such zones, with the peripheral and internal ones carrying a positive electric charge, and the intermediate one being negative (Fig. 13). The apparent electroneutrality of the neutron (when viewed from afar) indicates that its positively and negatively “charged” zones are mutually compensated.

Are there any objective data confirming the correspondence of the proposed model of graviton bunches to the realities of the material world?
It is unlikely to ever be able to “discern” the structure of microbunches of gravitons, in particular electrons and nucleons, even with the help of the most advanced observational or measuring means. But for this, one can resort to the help of megalots of gravitons, which, as mentioned earlier, have the same four-soliton structure, for example, the core of the Sun. On the surface of our star, bipolar spots are constantly observed, which are the manifestation on its face of the joints of solitons in the solar core.

 In FIG. 14 schematically shows the change in the latitude and magnetic polarity of sunspots during successive cycles of solar activity that took place in the first half of this century. As can be seen from FIG. 14, both the polarity of the sunspots and the nature of their movement are in complete agreement with the L lines at the junctions of solitons on the core surface of graviton bunches.

 It should be added that the intensity and polarity of the magnetic fields generated by the Sun and measured in the region of the Earth's orbit has the form shown in FIG. 11. This field, measured in the plane of the solar equator, twice changes the tension from minimum to maximum and four times the polarity.

 Elements of the ubiquitous substance are gravitons, which in the modern Universe are in constant motion. Those of them that move to different-sized clumps of primordial particles of matter (whether it is an “elementary” particle, the core of a planet or star), while changing their size and shape, create the material basis of space. Thus, those or other areas of space are all the more densified and curved, the closer they are to the cores of different-scale bunches of gravitons and the more massive the bunches themselves. It follows, in particular, that when creating models of the microworld ("elementary" particles, atomic nuclei, atoms, molecules, elements of crystal lattices), as well as when describing the processes occurring in the microworld and the phenomena taking place in it, it is necessary to take into account the pronounced anisotropy of space .

The structure and properties of microbunches of gravitons that do not translate in ether, which also has an unchanged intensity of its electromagnetic field, are described. In the real material world, things are more complicated: both the microbunches of gravitons themselves and all microsystems and bodies consisting of them move at different speeds, and the intensity of the electromagnetic fields they intersect changes to a greater or lesser extent. Without dwelling on a detailed description of the processes that determine the change in the parameters and properties of graviton microbunches with a change in the intensity of the surrounding magnetic field (N), the "density" of the ether at the location of the microbunches (P), and their translational velocity in such ether (V), we restrict ourselves to a brief commentary on FIG. 15, in which a peculiar coordinate system shows these changes. The peculiarity of this system is that (unlike the usual Cartesian system), the values of N, P, and V decrease with distance from the origin, i.e. that (N ₀ , P ₀ , V ₀ )> (N ₁ , P ₁ , V ₁ ), etc. From FIG. Figure 15 shows, firstly, that any microbunch of gravitons can exist within certain limits, limited by the values N ₀ , P ₀ , V ₀ ) and (N ₈ , P ₈ , V ₈ ) characteristic of it, and secondly, that these within the range of external parameters, the micro-object changes its own parameters in a significant range and, thirdly, that there are conditions (N ₄ , P ₄ , V ₄ ), where many of its parameters reach their maximum values. For example, if some kind of graviton bunch, say an electroton moving at a speed of V ₄ in the ether region in which the “density” of the latter was P ₄ , for some reason falls into the ether region with a high “density”, for example P ₂ , then it will lose part of its mass (Δm), reduce the average strain of its gravitons (δΔx), its volume (Δq), its electric charge (ΔH _Σ ), reduce the number of revolutions around its own axis (Δn) and etc.

 It follows from what has been said that the current concept of the invariance of mass, electric charge, and mechanical moment (spin) of subatomic particles under any conditions is erroneous. The law of conservation of electric charge, supposedly allowing, as mentioned earlier, only “pairwise” destruction or birth of subatomic particles, should also be included in the list of erroneous ones.

 The acceleration, for example, of an electron in a synchrotron is accompanied, as is well known, by characteristic radiation, which is the discharge of daughter microdrops from the "fur coat" of a microobject. This synchrotron radiation indicates a decrease in the mass of the electron as its speed increases, and not an increase in the latter, as follows from the special theory of relativity. The need to increase (as the speed of the subatomic particle increases) the frequency of the accelerating electric field and to increase, according to a certain law, the magnetic field strength necessary for the formation of its trajectory, is not caused by an increase in the relativistic mass of the microbunch of gravitons, but by a decrease in its electric charge, a decrease in the size of the micro-object, moreover, not only in the direction of motion, as is assumed by the same theory, but in all three directions, i.e. in volume. But it doesn’t follow from this (as it should have happened in accordance with the law of conservation of electric charge) that the charge of that proton, which is not known anywhere, with which the accelerated electron was once associated in an atom, should decrease to the same extent, say hydrogen.

 A change in one of the parameters of graviton microbunches, which is important for understanding the proposed method for extracting energy from subatomic particles, should be said in more detail. As can be seen from FIG. 15, as the intensity of the external magnetic field (N) increases or the velocity of the micro-object (V) increases, its volume (q) is constantly decreasing.

 Is there any objective evidence to support such a change? The decrease in the volume of subatomic particles, in particular neutrons, with an increase in their speed is not only proven experimentally, but has long been taken into account in the calculations of nuclear reactors. True, the results of these experiments are misinterpreted today. This refers to the so-called microscopic cross sections, which are the effective cross-sectional area of the nucleus, upon falling into which the incident neutron causes one or another reaction or undergoes scattering. It is believed that these cross sections depend on the speed of neutrons represented as point microobjects and on the quantum-mechanical properties of nuclei. In particular, as the experiments show, the radiative capture cross sections in the region of thermal neutrons, i.e. neutrons moving at relatively low speeds for most nuclides decrease inversely with the speed of neutrons. In the region of fast neutrons, the cross sections for radiation capture decrease by about 100 times in comparison with the micro cross sections for the capture of thermal neutrons.

Simplifying, for clarity, the existing ideas about microscopic sections, we can (with reference to Fig. 16, the coordinate system on which is similar to that shown in Fig. 15) say the following. It is believed that the above changes in microscopic sections are caused by changes in the cross sections of atomic nuclei. In other words, it is assumed that the nucleus of a nuclide, sensing in some way only known to it, that a point neutron flying in its direction has a thermal velocity (V ₅ ), instantly increases in volume several times and becomes such (Q ₅ ⁱ ), as shown in FIG. 16. If the neutron flying in its direction moves with speed V ₁ , i.e. is fast, then the nucleus of the nuclide is compressed and occupies a much smaller volume (Q ₁ ^I ), as shown here.

Explanations of this kind raise a number of unanswered questions so far, for example, what to do to a nucleus of a nuclide if fast and thermal neutrons are moving from different directions at the same time, or what kind of "mechanism" causes a change in the volume of nuclei in such wide limits?
Everything falls into place and finds a completely logical explanation if we imagine that the volume of the nucleus of the nuclide Q ⁱ (which plays a passive role in the described process) remains unchanged, but changes its volume q ⁿ depending on the speed of the neutron (Fig. 17).

 Since great hopes were pinned earlier and are being placed by some now on energy production due to the annihilation process, moreover, not only subatomic particles unlike in the sign of the electric charge, but also the usual substance with a certain hypothetical antimatter, we should briefly dwell on this. First of all, it must be said that the division of microbunches of gravitons into normal particles and their antipodes is purely arbitrary. It all depends on the orientation of the axis of rotation, and therefore the polarity of the intrinsic magnetic field generated by the micro-object relative to the lines of force of the external magnetic field. If the polarities of the bunch of gravitons and the external magnetic field coincide (Fig. 18a), then it is perceived as a normal particle, otherwise (Fig. 18b) - as an antiparticle. It should be recalled that the theoretical justification for the existence of a positively charged electron double was made by Dirac in 1931, and the following year Anderson discovered such a particle in cosmic rays and called it a positron.

Antiprotons were first experimentally discovered in 1955 in Berkeley (USA) during the firing of protons of a copper target accelerated to 6.3 GeV. Then, for 10 ¹¹ collisions, there were only a few antiprotons. Over time, antiproton beams were created at all large accelerators, giving several tens of antiprotons per pulse. At such accelerators, using a system of deflecting magnets, negatively charged particles are selected, the vast majority of which are pi-mesons. In the first experiment, for example, for each antiproton there were about 60,000 pi-mesons. Antiprotons are separated from other charged particles by their mass
The birth of antiprotons is currently explained as follows. In the case when, firstly, the kinetic energy of the proton "projectile" is sufficient for the formation (when the "energy into mass" occurs) of two nucleons, and secondly, when the proton "projectile" collides with the target nucleon, new proton-antiproton pair. “New” because both the den “shell” and the proton of the target are preserved during the collision.

 What is the process of birth of an antiproton to the author? Without intending to set forth his ideas about the structure of atomic nuclei within the framework of this application, he only wants to say that atomic nuclei are proton-neutron ribbons folded into peculiar spirals. These "ribbons" consist of blocks: two protons - one neutron (at the ends of the "ribbons" facing outward spirals), two protons - three neutrons (in most of the "ribbons") and one proton - two neutrons (in the inner turns of heavy chemical helices elements). In FIG. 19 schematically shows a top view of the nuclear helix of one of the atoms of the copper target, as well as the orientation of the poles and the direction of rotation of the protons 1 and 2, which are part of the outward-facing spiral end of the ribbon. When shelling such a spiral with accelerated protons 3, it is most likely that proton 1 will be knocked out of it, manifesting itself as a normal particle in the fields of deflecting magnets. Judging by the results of experiments, in rare cases, protons 3 also knock out protons 2, which have opposite polarity and direction of rotation relative to protons 1. They are perceived in the system of deflecting magnets as antiparticles.

 Since the electrons in atoms surround the nuclear "ribbons" on both sides, interacting with those protons in the "field of view" of which they are located, the positron production can be explained in a similar way.

But if the situation with the birth of antiparticles is so simple, the question naturally arises of why they are relatively rare in near-Earth space, in particular in cosmic radiation. This is explained by the fact that under natural conditions, over time, antiparticles self-transform into normal particles. If the polarity of the dipole magnetic field generated by the graviton bunch (H _c in Fig. 10) coincides with the direction of the lines of force of the external magnetic field (H) surrounding the microobject, as shown in FIG. 20a, the magnetic field acting on the last microdipole will be the sum of the intrinsic (Σh) and external (H) magnetic fields. If a bunch of gravitons enters an opposite field (Fig. 20b), in which a micro-object will appear to be an antiparticle, the intensity of the total field acting on each element of it will decrease and will be equal to the difference between the field intensities H and Σh, which is equivalent to a particle entering a magnetic field with a lower intensity . In this case, a bunch of gravitons will increase its volume, slow down rotation around its own axis, etc. (Fig. 15). Fending off a decrease in the magnetic field, the micro-object will more intensively lose its “weight”, but ... the accelerated rotation of the graviton microbunch will not help him much, since in the magnetic field acting on each of its elements the fraction of the field created by its brothers (Σh) will decrease, and the fraction of the field H will increase. The situation is further aggravated by the fact that under such conditions the core of the bunch has difficulty with the "absorption" of gravitons from the surrounding ether, due to their different orientation. For these reasons, the process of "melting" of the micro-object, reducing its speed and increase in size progresses until its inversion with the "use" of the magnetic moment inherent in all graviton bunches becomes "under the force" of the external magnetic field (Fig. 20c). After a coup, the magnetic fields H and Σh acting on the components of the gravitational bunch of the microdipole will add up and it will intensively increase its “weight”, i.e. move from right to left in FIG. 15 coordinates, until it reaches the corresponding intensity of the external magnetic field of the equilibrium state. In this case, the direction of rotation of the micro-object around its own axis will also change, i.e. it transforms itself from an antiparticle into a normal particle.

 The concepts of the nature and sign of the electric charge are set out in comparative detail, because the main argument among opponents who consider it impossible in principle to obtain energy by destroying subatomic particles, in particular protons or electrons, is that in this case the law of conservation of electric charge is violated, elevated, as mentioned earlier, to the rank of fundamental.

 And now briefly about the interaction of graviton clumps with ether. Those heavily deformed gravitons and microdroplets consisting of them that are constantly ejected in all directions from the "fur coats" of different-sized clumps of gravitons determine the movement of all objects existing in nature, starting with a tiny photon and ending with an incomparably larger star. Gravitons flowing in the direction of movement of such objects and microdroplets consisting of them encounter “head-on” ether resistance to a moving object, i.e. have a lower speed compared to those that are thrown from the object in the opposite direction. The total reactive force of "traction" created in this way also moves all the clumps of gravitons existing in nature and the bodies consisting of them. It also lies at the basis of gravitational interaction: any material object, under the influence of this force, self-aspires to the area of space where the “density” of ether is higher. The indicated “traction” force is the greater in magnitude, the greater the gradient of the “compaction” of space near a particular bunch of gravitons (or an object consisting of such clusters), to which a particle or any other material body self-strives.

This can be illustrated by the example of the gravitational interaction of a proton (p) and an electron (e). For clarity, gravitons can be likened to the molecules of a gas, and the density of the “packing” of gravitons of a particular region of space can be represented as the pressure of the graviton “gas” (P) in this ether region. In FIG. 21 schematically shows the position of subatomic particles in the case when the distance between them is many times greater than their own size. In this position, the pressure drop of the graviton "gas" (ΔP ₁ ) on different sides of the electron is small, calculated in fractions of a percent of the average pressure of this "gas" in this place. To describe the force of the graviton interaction of two mega- and macrobodies under similar conditions, Newton proposed at the time a dependence describing the law of universal gravitation.

Another thing is the interaction of graviton bunches located close to each other, for example, a proton and an electron in a hydrogen atom, where the pressure of the graviton “gas” between microobjects is significantly greater than from the opposite side (see Fig. 22). In this regard, the pressure drop indicated above (ΔP ₂ ) and, consequently, the force F ₂ will also be several times larger.

 It follows from the foregoing that, to determine the forces of gravitational interaction, graviton bunches are located relatively close to each other, i.e., when the distance between them is comparable to the size of microobjects, which takes place, for example, in atomic nuclei and to a lesser extent in atoms, by the usual law Newton should not be used, since it is possible to significantly underestimate the magnitude of the forces of gravitational interaction. In such cases, it is necessary to use a different dependence that takes into account the “compaction” of space (increasing the pressure of the graviton “gas”) as micro-objects approach each other.

 The forces due to the electromagnetic interaction of micro-objects carrying an electric charge behave in a similar manner.

 Gravitons in the process of moving toward graviton bunches constantly decrease their volume (a) and shape, and therefore increase both the apparent total magnetism (h) and its excess component (Δh). These relative changes are especially pronounced near graviton bunches (Fig. 23). In view of the foregoing, we consider the electromagnetic interaction of two stationary electric charges, for example, the proton (p) and electron (e) mentioned. Let's start this time with the option when the distance between the micro-objects is many times larger than their own dimensions (Fig. 24). To determine the forces of electromagnetic interaction of material objects that have an electric charge, in such positions Coulomb proposed a well-known dependence at one time. In accordance with it, the force of mutual attraction (or repulsion) of charges changes inversely with the square of the distance separating these charges. In FIG. 24 gravitons moving toward microobjects are depicted in the form of magnets having northern (N) and southern (S) "parts". As can be seen from FIG. 24, the polarity of excess magnetism in gravitons moving toward a proton and an electron is the opposite, which determines the mutual attraction of opposite in sign electric charges. It should be emphasized that electric charges are attracted to each other not by themselves, but through the "intermediate agent" - ether.

 At the bottom of FIG. 24 schematically shows the change in apparent total magnetism (h) and its excess components (Δh) for gravitons moving toward a proton and an electron. As can be seen from FIG. 24, in this embodiment, the forces of electromagnetic interaction due to the mutual attraction of gravitons along the plane I-I are relatively small.

 Another thing is the interaction of protons and electrons located close to each other, i.e. in the embodiment when the distance between the clumps of gravitons is comparable with their absolute sizes (Fig. 25). In this case, the forces of electromagnetic interaction, due to the mutual attraction of gravitons along the II-II plane, are significantly larger than the usual Coulomb forces. As two charges approach each other, the electromagnetic field strength between them increases inversely not with the square of the distance, but with a higher, ever-increasing power dependence on the latter. This is also due to the compaction of space near graviton bunches, which is not taken into account in the Coulomb dependence.

 And now, taking into account the above ideas about the structure of microobjects, about the structure of electric charges and the forces of gravitational and electromagnetic interactions, we turn to the description of the simplest of atoms, namely a hydrogen atom consisting of one proton and one electron.

 First of all, it should be said about the fundamentally erroneous premise that was laid as the basis for the planetary and all subsequent atomic models, namely, the representation of a proton as a micro-object that supposedly carries only a positive electric charge. In order to “avoid” in this case the electron fall on the proton, our predecessors were forced to “force” it to rotate around the nucleus with tremendous speed. At the same time, it was assumed that the force of Coulomb mutual attraction of two oppositely charged microobjects is balanced by centrifugal force.

 But the proton, as mentioned earlier, is surrounded by latitudinally polarized fields, or, as they say now, has a combined electric charge: positive external and negative internal. In this regard, the electron in the hydrogen atom occupies a position relative to the nucleus in which the force of attraction to the proton due to the external magnetic belt carrying a positive electric charge is balanced by the force of repulsion of the same charged internal proton belt, as shown schematically in FIG. 26.

Turning again to FIG. 23. If we imagine that a proton is in its center, and the electron is located at the junctions of those gravitons that form a magnetic field corresponding to the proton charge, then the experimentally established emission spectrum of the atom in question can be explained. An electron located at a minimum distance from the proton (e ₁ in Fig. 23), that is, in the place of the relatively high pressure of the graviton “gas”, called the ground state, has minimal mass, dimensions, electric charge, etc. When an electron receives an additional portion of gravitons from the outside, for example, in the form of a photon, which, as they say now, has the corresponding energy, then it increases its mass, volume and magnitude of the electric charge. Due to the increase in the latter, the electron is repelled from the inner (negatively charged) proton belt and occupies one of the positions e ₂ , ... e ₅ (Fig. 23), called the excited states of the atom. However, the excited state does not exist for long. After the expiration of the so-called average lifetime, which in order of magnitude is only 10 ^-8 s, the electron again makes a jump back directly to the ground state or sequentially passes through the lower intermediate states one after another. At each such jump, a portion of gravitons previously absorbed is given in the form of a photon of the corresponding energy. The discreteness and originality of the structure of the magnetic field surrounding the proton determines that the discharge of gravitons from the electron into the surrounding ether takes place in the form, as they say now, of whole quanta. Indeed, as can be seen from FIG. 15, to each level of the intensity of the external magnetic field N there corresponds a well-defined bunch of gravitons (in this case, an electron) by mass and other parameters.

The question involuntarily begs: do electrons rotate in atoms around nuclei, as it appears in the planetary and all subsequent models?
Since we are talking about a hydrogen atom, we will consider those movements that the electron makes in it relative to the proton.

Any graviton bunch is surrounded by a latitudinal electromagnetic field, the intensity of which around it (in our case, the proton and electron) changes twice: from the minimum (h _min ) to maximum (h _max ) values, and the polarity - four times (Fig. 11).

 Since the proton rotates around its axis, then the field generated by it also “rotates”. Most likely, with the same angular velocity, the electron rotates around the common center of mass of the system in the hydrogen atom.

 Considering the ultimate rationality of nature, in particular, one of its fundamental principles - the principle of energy saving, it can be assumed that the intrinsic angular velocities of the proton and electron in a hydrogen atom are identical, that is, one and the other are always “visible” from one point of the proton same side of the electron. A kind of analogue of the described motion of micro-objects in a hydrogen atom can be the movement of the moon around the earth. It should be added to the above that the rotation around its axes is opposite for the electron and proton.

In addition to the latitudinal components, the surrounding gravitational clumps of magnetic fields also have meridional components (H _s in Fig. 10), the intensity of which increases with distance from the "equator" to the poles, and the polarity remains unchanged. These components provide, despite the change in the polarity of the wide components, the mutual orientation of the poles of the micro-objects, as well as the fact that the electron combines its equatorial plane with a similar proton plane. Under natural conditions, hydrogen is in the form of diatomic molecules having two modifications: an orthoform and a paraform. The existence of two modifications of hydrogen molecules is associated with different mutual orientations of the axes of rotation of protons, or, as it is customary to say now, nuclear spins of atoms. In parahydrogen molecules, nuclear spins are antiparallel, i.e. with parallel rotation axes, the protons of two hydrogen atoms have the opposite polarity. In orthohydrogen, the backs are parallel, i.e. protons of both atoms have the same polarity (Fig. 27). The “equatorial" planes of all subatomic particles of such a molecule are aligned, i.e. are in the same plane. In it, the coupling of protons is carried out by means of two electrons, making small-amplitude oscillations in well-defined regions of the indicated plane. At ordinary (room) temperature, hydrogen contains 75% paraforms and 25% orthoforms. The ratio of para- and orthoforms does not change if the temperature is above 25 ^o C. At a temperature of 20.4 K in equilibrium hydrogen contains about 0.21% of the orthoform, and such hydrogen is identified with parahydrogen. At temperatures below 10 K, the hydrogen orthoform is practically absent. Hydrogen production with an orthoform concentration of more than 75% is possible by distillation, since parahydrogen is more volatile. An effective separation is obtained by aluminum, which has selective adsorption at 20.4 K and an enrichment coefficient of 16. The hydrogen ortho-composition obtained at low temperatures is stable, which allows the accumulation and storage of hydrogen with a high content of molecules in it in the orthoform. The atoms and molecules of hydrogen in the orthoform are described in comparative detail, because it is due to the destruction of their subatomic particles that it is proposed to obtain energy.

 And now briefly about energy. By the energy melting in a substance, one should generally understand the average relative degree of deformation of gravitons that are part of one or another bunch of them. If in some way (for example, in the process of a chemical reaction, nuclear fusion, or destruction of a micro-object) a large or smaller group of gravitons is separated, which falls into the surrounding ether, then its constituent elements, trying to bring themselves into line with the new conditions, "unclench" ", i.e. increase their volume, "crowding" their brothers in the surrounding space, and reduce their apparent total magnetism. This fundamental process is perceived by us as the release of energy. Ultimately, many of the currently known types of energy can be reduced to it: thermal, chemical, nuclear, thermonuclear and annihilation.

 From what has been said, it follows that the amount of energy released during the course of a process in a given region of space depends, firstly, on the number of gravitons that left the microclusts, or, as they say now, on the mass defect of microobjects, and, secondly, from the difference in the degrees of the initial and final deformation of the gravitons that took part in the reaction. It follows that when the same number of gravitons is separated, for example, from a proton and an electron, more energy will be released in the first case than in the second, since gravitons are more densely packed in the proton. On the other hand, with the same initial deformation of gravitons in their microbunch, the more energy is released, the lower the pressure of the graviton “gas” in the ether surrounding the micro-object, i.e. the greater the possibility of increasing the volumes of those gravitons that left the microbunch.

 Based on the above ideas about the structure and properties of microcosm objects, we consider the conditions under which it was possible to annihilate microobjects in accelerators, and also analyze the possibility of destruction of subatomic particles due to a change in the pressure of the graviton “gas” surrounding them or the electromagnetic field strength at the location microbunches of gravitons.

Let's start with the last one. As discussed in connection with FIG. 15, the existence of graviton microbunches in nature is limited by two limits, in particular, the maximum (P ₀ ) and minimum (P ₈ ) pressure of the graviton “gas”. From this it can be concluded that one or another bunch of gravitons, for example, a proton or electron, can be destroyed by changing the external conditions, say, by increasing the “density” of the ether to P ₀ values or reducing it to P ₈ . In principle, this conclusion is correct. This is how the microbunches of gravitons in the central regions of planets and stars are destroyed, the nuclei of which grow due to the "absorption" of those gravitons that were part of decaying subatomic particles. Opposite extreme conditions (P ₈ in FIG. 15) take place in interstellar and intergalactic space. But it is unlikely that it will ever be possible to “condense” or “divide” the ether under terrestrial conditions, and, therefore, proposals for generating energy by destroying subatomic particles in this way seem futile.

 And now again about the process of annihilation of subatomic particles, in particular protons and "antiprotons". Due to the decrease in the volume of graviton microbunches, as the speed increases, the probability of their collision in colliders is already low. To overcome the forces of mutual repulsion of protons and "antiprotons" due to the "superposition" of the peripheral zones of microobjects of one beam on the same "charged" inner zones of microbunches of gravitons of another beam, as shown in FIG. 28, need high speed. In addition to the previously mentioned drawbacks of the process of energy production due to annihilation of microbunches in accelerators, the latter circumstance causes the presence of one more problem: in the collision and complete or partial destruction of microobjects, their “fragments” have high kinetic energy (daughter microdroplets of gravitons from “fur coats”, individual vortices are solitons of cores, perceived as mesons and muons) fly by inertia far from the collision site, which excludes the possibility of localizing the process of energy release in Shom space power plant. As an example, we can cite the processes that occur during the “firing” of beryllium targets by protons accelerated to an energy of 400 GeV at the synchrotron at CERN (Geneva). In the processes of intense collisions of accelerated protons with the atomic nuclei of the target, many mesons are generated, which are sorted and sent to a vacuum tunnel using a complex system of focusing and deflecting magnets and collimators, where some of them are converted into muons during the flight. Further, microobjects pass through steel and stone screens about 350 m long, where the remaining mesons, which lose energy in the processes of collisions with atomic nuclei, are absorbed. In addition, the screen slows down and stops the muons, whose energy gradually decreases during the electromagnetic interaction with the atoms of iron and stone (see. The fundamental structure of matter. Edited by J. Mulvey, M., Mir, 1984, pp. 140-141) . The likelihood of collisions between microbunches of gravitons having the same electric charges can be increased by exposing them to polarizing magnetic fields and, thus, preliminary orientation of the magnetic moments (magnetic "poles") of the micro-objects in the desired direction, as proposed in the aforementioned patent GB 795596. When In this case, the proton "shells" 1 and the proton "target" 2 must be mutually oriented as shown in FIG. 29, i.e. so that their rotation axes are parallel, and the polarity of the approaching "poles" of the micro-objects is opposite. In this position, electrically charged particles like small permanent magnets will be mutually attracted to each other, which will not only increase the probability of their collision, but at a sufficient velocity of the projectile particles will contribute to the destruction of the target particles.

 Not only protons, but also electrons behave in a similar way. At present, it is believed that “in the collision of an incident electron with the electrons of a substance, the so-called exchange effects occur due to the indistinguishability of the colliding electrons” (Yu. M. Shirokov, NP Yudin. Nuclear Physics, M., “Science” , 1980, p. 442) and which consist in the exchange of electrons by their characteristics — projections of spins and coordinates. These effects are caused by exchange forces, which are “essentially quantum in nature. Therefore, it is difficult to visualize them on the basis of classical macroscopic representations” (ibid., P. 185).

 “To obtain more complete information about the interactions of elementary particles,” the textbook cited further says, “we need some ideas about the structure of particles and the mechanism of reactions and decays. A complete theory of this circle of phenomena has not yet been created” (there same, p. 315). According to modern concepts, “the interaction of two electrons and, in general, the electromagnetic interaction of two charged particles occurs by transferring one virtual photon” (ibid., P. 321) from one particle to another and vice versa. Earlier, the applicant briefly stated his ideas about the structure of elementary particles, about the nature of their electric charges, as well as about the mechanism of electromagnetic interaction, which is not based on the instantaneous transfer from one particle to another virtual, that is, “intangible” even with the most modern technical means, photons, and the mutual attraction or repulsion of particles through the interaction of gravitons in the ether that separates them.

 As mentioned earlier (reference to Fig. 19), the atomic nuclei of medium-mass and heavy chemical elements are protons - neutron ribbons, rolled into a kind of spiral. Electrons in atoms, rotating around their axes, surround nuclear “ribbons” on both sides, interacting with those protons in the “field of view” of which they are located, and vibrating with a small amplitude within well-defined local regions of the nuclear environment . In fired solid-state "targets", atomic nuclei, and therefore the electrons that surround them, can be oriented differently. The core of the electron, as mentioned earlier, is surrounded by a single-band, albeit complex structural, electric charge. Therefore, during the firing of target electrons in a substance by projectile electrons, most often either scattering of projectile electrons from different angles is accompanied by changes in the projections of their spins, or knocking out target electrons from their places and filling the latter with "shells" electrons. These processes are also perceived as metabolic effects. The only exceptions are the cases conventionally shown in FIG. 30, when, firstly, the axes of rotation of the electrons - "shells" 1 and electrons - "targets" 2 are parallel, and, secondly, the polarity of the approaching "poles" of the electrons is opposite. In this position, the electrons are mutually attracted to each other, and at a sufficient velocity of the electron-shells, the destruction of the target electrons can occur, accompanied by the release of energy.

 The same result can be achieved in another way. With reference to FIG. 18 it was said that if the polarity of the microbunch of gravitons and the external magnetic field coincide, then it is perceived as a normal particle, in particular an electron, and if they do not coincide, then as an antiparticle, i.e., a positron. When an electron collides with a positron, it is possible not only their elastic scattering, but also transformation into lighter particles, most often into two photons. This process, called two-photon annihilation, is most easily observed for fading positrons, i.e. at low energies of positrons incident on resting electrons. In these cases, two γ-quanta fly out from the meeting point of the annihilating particles in opposite directions and have an energy of 0.51 MeV each (see, for example, Yu.M. Shirokov, NP Yudin. Nuclear Physics. M., "Science ", 1980, p. 338). Thus, if the target electrons 1 in the substance are bombarded with low-velocity projectile electrons 2, whose rotation axes are parallel to the rotation axes of the target electrons and the orientation of the poles is opposite, and the direction of motion is perpendicular to the rotation axes of the micro objects as shown schematically in FIG. 31, then the annihilation process, i.e. collapse of colliding particles, accompanied by the release of energy. In this case, the velocity of the "projectile" electrons should be relatively small, but sufficient so that they cannot reverse under intraatomic conditions, as described previously with reference to FIG. 20.

 From the foregoing, it follows that when creating industrial power plants operating due to the destruction of subatomic particles, it is necessary to organize the process in such a way that, firstly, as many collisions of micro objects as possible are ensured, and secondly, these collisions would occur with a relatively small initial kinetic energy of graviton microbunches, thirdly, the axis of rotation of the interacting particles would be parallel and, fourthly, so that the polarization of the colliding protons or electrons would be the same or when th motion elektronov- "shells" in a direction perpendicular to their axes of rotation, opposite polarization elektronov- "targets."

 The aim of the invention is the creation of a highly efficient environmentally friendly power plant, in which energy is obtained due to the destruction of subatomic particles, in particular protons and electrons.

 This goal is achieved by shelling spin-polarized hydrogen tablets, in which the maximum possible number of molecules is in the orthoform, with beams of accelerated subatomic particles. In this case, weakly focused and having the smallest possible dimensions in the direction of motion beams of protons or electrons accelerated to speeds are sent to hydrogen pellets preliminarily cooled to a temperature close to absolute zero, hydrogen tablets periodically fed into the active zone of the reaction chamber pre-evacuated and shielded from external electromagnetic fields sufficient to penetrate the subatomic particles of the beams deep into the hydrogen tablets and destroy as many tablets as possible subatomic particles.

 In the case of using “projectiles” as particles in proton beams, the latter are polarized in the same way as protons were polarized in hydrogen pellets and provide a direction of motion that coincides with the direction of their rotation axes.

 In the case of using as particles, "shells" in electron beams, two options can be implemented. In the first of them, the electrons in the beams polarize in the same way as the electrons were polarized in hydrogen pellets, and provide the direction of electron motion in the beams, which coincides with the direction of their rotation axes. In the second embodiment, the electrons in the beams polarize in the opposite way as the electrons in the tablets were polarized, and provide the direction of electron motion in the beams perpendicular to the axes of rotation of the electrons in the hydrogen tablets.

In FIG. 32 schematically shows the proposed method for producing energy, where the positions indicated:
1 - protons, "shells";
2 - target protons;
3 - molecules of orthohydrogen tablets;
4 - target electrons;
5 - electrons, "shells".

 As you know, hydrogen molecules 3 consist of two atoms, each of which in turn consists of one proton 2 and one electron 4. In the hydrogen molecule, which is in the orthoform, the rotation axes of all subatomic particles are parallel, and the "poles" of the same name are oriented the same, but opposite to the orientation of the same "poles" of electrons.

 In the case of using protons 1 as “shells” in the reaction chamber, they collide with subatomic particles of the tablet, in particular with its protons 2. These collisions are accompanied either by partial destruction of the “target” protons, i.e. departure from their "fur coats" of daughter microdrops of gravitons (mesons), or the complete decay of these particles, i.e. dividing their cores into four soliton vortices. Both those and other short-lived composite particles of proton “targets” decay soon in the reaction chamber into the gravitons that form them, which, trying to bring themselves into line with the new condition, expand, i.e. emit energy.

 To increase the probability of destruction of the subatomic particles of the tablet by protons, "shells" moving at relatively low speeds, it is necessary to first expose these and other microobjects in space, that is, in a certain way orient the axis of rotation of the graviton microbunch and their pole.

 Of all the possible options, the most suitable from this point of view is that shown in FIG. 29 and on the left side of FIG. 32, i.e. when, firstly, the axis of rotation of the protons, "shells" are parallel to the axes of rotation of the subatomic particles of the tablet, secondly, the orientation of the poles of the protons of the "shells" 1 and protons of the tablet 2 is the same, and thirdly, when the direction of motion of the protons is "shells" "coincides with the direction of the axes of their rotation.

 As mentioned earlier, the strength of the meridional component of the magnetic field in graviton microbunches (h in Fig. 9) is maximum in the regions of their poles, i.e., in these areas of the ether surrounding the microobject, both the apparent total magnetism of gravitons (h) and its excess component are maximal (Δh) and the polarity of the latter at the opposite poles of subatomic particles is opposite. In this regard, as we approach the oriented ones as shown in FIG. 32, proton “shells” 1 to the protons of tablet 2, that is, as their oppositely polarized poles come closer together, the previously described forces of electromagnetic and gravitational interactions, which determine this option (in contrast to the version shown on Fig. 28) the mutual attraction of microobjects. This will make it possible to ensure the destruction of proton “targets” by proton “shells” that have a relatively small kinetic energy.

 With the opposite orientation of the poles of protons, "shells" and protons, "targets" the forces of their repulsion will be maximum, which will require a significant increase in the speeds of protons, "shells" with all the ensuing negative consequences.

 Will energy be emitted from protons "shells" in the described process? It is likely that when these subatomic particles collide with the protons of the tablet, some part of the daughter microdroplets of gravitons and from the "fur coats" of proton "shells" will "shake off", but their cores, the vortex-soliton interconnection forces in which are quite large, including and due to the movement of micro-objects on the air, they will be preserved. In this regard, the direct contribution of proton "shells" to the amount of energy released will be negligible.

 So far, it has been a matter of generating energy through the destruction of target protons. But there are electrons in the hydrogen atoms 4. Although, due to the substantially smaller than protons (almost 2000 times), the number of gravitons in the electrons and their initial deformation is lower in the latter, the amount of energy released in the case of destruction of these subatomic particles of the tablet will be relatively small, but to increase the efficiency of the proposed method for generating energy, it is possible to destroy electrons, especially since particles are "shells", which can be used as electrons generated during ionization hydrogen volumes.

 Due to the fact that these subatomic particles have a single-band electric charge, it is possible to orient and direct the "projectile" electrons to the tablet electrons not only as described above in the case of the proton variant, that is, into the "end face" of molecules 3 and with the same orientation of the poles of electrons - "shells" and electrons - "targets", but in the direction of the equatorial planes of the subatomic particles of the tablet. In the embodiment, when the direction of movement of the electrons of the "shells" 5 is perpendicular to the axes of their rotation, the orientation of the poles of the latter should be opposite to their counterparts in the tablet, that is, such electrons can be represented in the form of positrons (Fig. 31 and the lower part Fig. 32). At a low speed of translational movement of microobjects-"shells" 5 and their mutual attraction (under the influence of electromagnetic and gravitational forces) with the electrons of tablet 4, not only the latter can be destroyed, but also annihilation of both colliding microbunches of gravitons, accompanied by the release of more energy.

 Of course, during the firing of a hydrogen tablet, electrons dispersed to optimal speeds will also destroy electrons. However, prior to conducting relevant experiments, it is not possible to assess the share of their contribution to the total energy release.

 The proposal to use orthohydrogen as a “fuel” cooled to a temperature close to absolute zero is due to a number of circumstances. To facilitate the task of partial or complete destruction of graviton microbunches, it is necessary to ensure conditions under which the forces of interconnection of their components (vortex-solitons in cores and daughter microdroplets of “fur coats” with the latter) are minimal. These forces are ultimately determined by the gravitonomagnetic interaction of the gravitons that make up the micro-object. The larger the volume of gravitons, and therefore, the less their apparent total magnetism, the less is the force of interconnection of the components of a microbunch of gravitons. As can be seen from FIG. 15, the volume of a bunch of gravitons (q) and, consequently, of its constituent elements increases as the pressure of the graviton "gas" in the surrounding space (P), the intensity of the external magnetic field (N) and the velocity of the micro-object (V) decrease.

 The pressure of the graviton "gas" in the microworld, to a first approximation, is determined by how many microbunches of gravitons are in a given volume of space. For example, in areas of atomic nuclei of medium-mass and heavy chemical elements, the pressure of the graviton “gas” is relatively high, the gravitons included in the composition of subatomic particles have a relatively high average deformation (δX), and, therefore, a strong relationship. From the foregoing, it follows that of all chemical elements, hydrogen is most suitable for the role of a “target”. The pressure of the graviton “gas” in the core is reduced by evacuation of the reaction chamber and shielding it from external magnetic fields.

 As follows from the foregoing, the probability of partial or complete destruction of graviton microbunches largely depends on the parallelism of the rotation axes of the “target” particles and the “projectile” particles and on the relative orientation of their “poles”. Of all the chemical elements, only for hydrogen and helium do the axes of rotation of all subatomic particles forming atoms are parallel. For all subsequent chemical elements, starting with lithium, the nuclear ribbons are more or less curved. In particular, in the closing second period of the table, D.I. Mendeleev’s neon said “ribbon” forms the first turn of the nuclear spiral. Consequently, the axes of rotation of nucleons and electrons of these atoms are not parallel, but intersect at larger or smaller angles, which excludes the possibility of destruction of as many subatomic particles as possible when shelling particles with such shells. Since, in the hydrogen molecule, as was said above, firstly, the rotation axes of all subatomic particles are parallel and, secondly, the "poles" of the same subatomic particles are equally oriented for hydrogen molecules in the orthoform, and for this reason they are most suitable for the role of "targets" are hydrogen tablets, in which the maximum number of molecules is in orthoform.

 The speed of movement of microobjects (atoms, molecules) and the speed of rotation of graviton microbunches around their axes (n) depends on the relative non-uniformity of the pressure of the graviton “gas” in the space surrounding them, or, as they say now, on the ambient temperature. In this regard, it is necessary to cool the orthohydrogen forming the tablet to the lowest possible temperature, which can be done, for example, by freezing orthohydrogen in liquid helium, the temperature of which is close to absolute zero. When cooled to 14 K, solid hydrogen forms - a white foamy mass whose density is 12 times less than water.

 Under the above conditions, subatomic particles of a hydrogen tablet, as can be seen from FIG. 15 will have relatively large volumes (q), which will increase the likelihood of projectile particles entering them. This, combined with the solid state of the “fuel”, will make it possible to solve one of the two above problems, i.e. will provide a large number of collisions of micro-objects.

 The firing of hydrogen tablets should be carried out by weakly focused beams of protons, "shells". Weakly focused beams, because with their strong focusing, intense heating of local areas in the tablets will occur and, as a result, the above advantages will be lost due to the low temperatures of the atoms of the hydrogen tablets. For the same reason, it is necessary to ensure the minimum possible extent of the beams in the direction of their movement. Otherwise, the proton “shells” leading in the beams will interact with the subatomic particles of the tablet earlier than others, accompanied by the release of a large amount of energy, and, consequently, heating of those areas in the tablet (with all the negative consequences arising from this) that will fall into a little later the "shells" are outsiders. Achieving a reduction in the size of the beams in the direction of their motion can be achieved by increasing the frequency of the electric field, accelerating their microbunches of gravitons.

 It should be noted that when implementing the proposed method for generating energy from matter, energy costs will be much less than in the previously described process of annihilation of subatomic particles at colliders. After all, it is proposed to use not exotic "antiprotons" obtained in extremely limited quantities at energy-intensive accelerators as particle "shells", but ordinary protons obtained in the required quantities in the process of hydrogen ionization. There will be much less energy consumption for the accumulation, storage and acceleration of “projectile” particles.

 As you know, the processes of fission of nuclei of heavy chemical elements and thermonuclear fusion are accompanied by the release into the environment of a large number of free neutrons and quanta of hard γ-radiation, which creates a number of problems associated with increased radioactivity. When implementing the proposed method, the release of energy will occur due to the decay of protons and electrons into short-lived fragments, which will lead to an incomparably smaller harmful effect on the environment. The obvious advantages of the proposed method of extracting energy from a substance include the practical inexhaustibility of "fuel" - hydrogen.

 Of every 100 atoms in the earth's crust, 15 (1% by mass) is hydrogen. Under natural conditions, it is combined with many chemical elements: oxygen, sulfur, carbon, chlorine, etc. It is a part of water (about 11% by weight), various compounds that form coal, oil, natural gases, etc.

To assess the effectiveness of the proposed method for extracting energy from matter, approximate calculations of a power plant with a capacity of 1000 MW were carried out, operating on superheated steam up to 560 ^o C, the pressure of which in front of the first stage of the turbine was 240 atm. In this case, the steam consumption per second should be about 800 kg, and the thermal power of the reaction chamber is approximately 3.2 • 10 ⁶ kW (0.76 • 10 ⁶ kcal / s, or 3.2 • 10 ⁶ erg / s). Since it is not possible to estimate the amount of energy released due to the destruction of protons and electrons before carrying out the corresponding experiments, the calculations were carried out for two options.

In the first of them, it was assumed that energy is released only due to the destruction of the "loose" protons of the tablets. The mass of one proton under ordinary conditions is 1.67 • 10 ^-27 kg. During its decay, if we use dependence (2), 1.67 • 10 ^-27 kg • (3 • 10 ⁸ m / s) = 1.5 • 10 ^-10 J, or 1.5 • 10 ^-3 erg, should stand out energy. It follows that in the working chamber of a power plant with a capacity of 1000 MW, 2.1 • 10 ¹⁹ protons must decay every second. Since, as a first approximation, it can be assumed that the mass of the hydrogen atom is determined by the mass of the proton, the second hydrogen consumption at the installation in question will be approximately 3.5 • 10 ^-8 kg, and taking into account the cost of preparing proton “shells” - 7 • 10 ^-8 kg. Since in this embodiment the energy will be released due to protons, it should be compared with nuclear reactions, in particular with the most effective of them, the synthesis of helium-4 nuclei from deuterons. If it was possible to master the controlled synthesis process, then at such a power plant of the indicated capacity, every second it would be necessary to expend 5.7 • 10 ^-6 kg of deuterium, which is more than 80 times more than the above hydrogen consumption.

In the second version, it was assumed that the release of energy occurs only due to the decay of electrons, moreover, as part of the tablet, and used as "shells". Since the mass of one electron under ordinary conditions is 9.11 • 10 ^-31 kg, then each of these microbunches of gravitons during its decay should emit 9.11 • 10 ^-31 kg • (3 • 10 ⁸ m / s) ² = 8, 2 • 10 ^-14 J, or 8.2 • 10 ^-7 erg of energy. Consequently, 4 • 10 ²² electrons and "positrons" should decay every second in the reaction chamber. The mass of the hydrogen atom is known - 1.67 • 10 ^-27 kg. So, for the preparation of tablets and electrons, "shells" it is necessary to expend about 7 • 10 ^-5 kg of hydrogen every second at a power plant that generates 1000 MW of electric energy.

Since in the case under discussion the energy will be released by electrons, it is advisable to compare it with chemical reactions in which the same “actors” are present. The most effective of these is the oxygen-hydrogen reaction. When the power plant in question was operated on an oxygen-hydrogen mixture, the latter would have to consume 26 kg every second, which is 3.7 • 10 ⁵ more than during the decay of electrons.

Of course, to ensure the destruction of the above quantities of protons and electrons in real conditions, a many times larger number of hydrogen atoms will be required, firstly, for feeding into the reaction chamber in the form of tablets and, secondly, for preparing proton and electronic "shells" . But unreacted hydrogen atoms, and their components, including particles, "shells", can be used repeatedly. In this regard, it is more correct to relate the energy received in the process under consideration to the total mass of only those particles that cease to exist in the form of microbunches of gravitons, i.e., are dissolved in ether. Unfortunately, the author does not know the average volume of gravitons both in protons and electrons, and in the ether surrounding us, and therefore is forced to use the dependence (2). It follows that in one gram of the substance, as stated at the beginning of the application, contains 9 • 10 ²³ erg of energy. Therefore, for the continuous operation of a power plant with a capacity of 1000 MW during the year, it will be necessary to "dissolve" only 0.35 kg of hydrogen in the air. Fully aware of how incorrect the assumptions made above are, and therefore the calculations made on their basis, the author nevertheless believes that the proposed method for extracting energy from matter is tens or hundreds of times more effective than all currently known methods , including the process of synthesis of helium-4 nuclei from deuterons.

 To begin work on the development of the proposed method for generating energy, it is necessary to conduct experiments on the "shelling" of polarized orthohydrogen tablets cooled to a temperature close to absolute zero, described by proton and electron beams described above. These works can be carried out on existing accelerators. The purpose of the experiments will be not only a demonstration of the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method for generating energy, but also the establishment of optimal parameters for the design of industrial power plants.

 The proposed method for generating energy is implemented in the installation, the circuit diagram of which is presented in FIG. 33.

 In FIG. 33 positions marked: 6 - tank of liquid hydrogen; 7 - distillation unit; 8 - dispenser; 9 - hydrogen-helium heat exchanger; 10 - helium dosing unit; 11 - an electromagnet; 12 is a device for supplying tablets; 13 is a hydrogen tablet; 14 - reaction chamber; 15 - polarization-accelerating proton block; 16 - polarization-accelerating electronic unit; 17 - coolant circulation pump; 18 - heat carrier capacity; 19 - a cooling channel of the reaction chamber; 20 - heat exchanger; 21 - a water pump; 22 - working turbine; 23 - an electric generator; 24 - valve; 25 - heat exchanger of the reaction chamber; 26 - a vacuum chamber; 27 - a vacuum pump; 28 is a hydrogen liquefaction device; 29 is an ionization block.

 In such an installation, the liquid hydrogen tank 6 is connected by a pipeline to the entrance to the distillation unit 7, the exits from which are connected to the tank 6 and to the entrance to the dispenser 8. The output from the dispenser is connected to the entrance to the hydrogen-helium heat exchanger 9, which is connected by highways to the helium re-cooling unit 10. The hydrogen-helium heat exchanger is surrounded by an electromagnet 11 and is connected at the outlet to a device 12 for supplying hydrogen tablets 13 to the reaction chamber 14, which is connected to the exits from the polarization-accelerating proton 15 and electron 16 b shackles. The circulation pump 17 is connected by highways to the outlet of the coolant tank 18 and to the entrance to the cooling path of the reaction chamber 19, the outlet of which is connected by a pipe to the entrance to the coolant tank. The heat exchanger of the steam-water system 20 is connected by a pipeline to the outlet of the water pump 21 and to the steam inlet to the working turbine 22 connected to the electric generator 23. The valve 24 is connected through the heat exchanger 25 to the outlet of the reaction chamber and to the inlet to the vacuum chamber 26, the outlet of which is connected to the entrance to the vacuum pump 27. The exits from the vacuum pump are connected by highways with the inputs to the hydrogen liquefaction device 28 and to the ionization unit 29. The output from the device 28 is connected by a line to the liquid hydrogen tank, and the outputs from the ionization block are connected the entrance to the polarization-accelerating proton and electron units.

 Liquid hydrogen from the tank 6 is supplied to the distillation unit 7, in which it is divided into orthohydrogen and parahydrogen. The first of them is fed into the dispenser 8, where it is bottled in special sleeves designed to form hydrogen tablets, and the second is returned to the tank 6. Then, the sleeves with orthohydrogen enter the hydrogen-helium heat exchanger 9, in which it is frozen by cooling with liquid helium, which has a temperature close to absolute zero. Liquid helium is supplied from the helium re-cooling unit 10, in which, as it is returned from the heat exchanger, helium is re-cooled to the initial temperature. For the necessary orientation of the orthohydrogen atoms (their microbunches of gravitons) during the freezing process, the heat exchanger is surrounded by a special electromagnet 11, which creates a magnetic field that is appropriate in intensity and polarity. Using the device 12 for supplying hydrogen tablets 13, the latter are periodically fed into the active zone of the reaction chamber 14. At the right moments, weakly focused and polarized proton beams are sent from the polarization accelerator block 15 to the tablets in the indicated zone, and electron beams from block 16 (" positrons ").

 The energy released during the destruction of graviton microbunches, the carriers of which is a high-pressure graviton "gas", individual subatomic particles and their daughter microdrops, unreacted hydrogen atoms and "projectile" particles, is transferred through the walls of the reaction chamber to the coolant supplied by the circulation pump 17 from the coolant tank 18 into the cooling path 19 of the reaction chamber. Water is supplied to the heat exchanger 20, located in the indicated tank, through the pump 21, which, after heating and evaporation, enters the turbine 22 connected to the electric generator 23. After each cycle, the valve 24 opens and the high-temperature gas in the reaction chamber passes through the heat exchanger 25 and giving it most of the heat, it enters the vacuum chamber 26. From this chamber, the vacuum pump 27 pumps the gas into the device 28, in which the liquefied hydrogen is returned to the tank. Part of the hydrogen gas after the pump 27 enters the block 29, in which it is ionized. The protons obtained during ionization are supplied to the polarization-accelerating block 15, and the electrons to block 16.

Claims (5)

 1. A method of generating energy by shelling polarized hydrogen tablets with spin-polarized beams of subatomic particles, characterized in that the polarized hydrogen tablets, in which the maximum possible number of molecules are in orthoform, are cooled to a temperature close to absolute zero, periodically fed to the active zone of the reaction chamber pre-evacuated and shielded from external electromagnetic fields, where they are fired with weakly focused and having the smallest possible dimensions in the motion of the polarized subatomic particles by the beams, while the subatomic particles in the beams are oriented so that their rotation axes are parallel to the axes of rotation of protons and electrons in the tablets, and accelerate to speeds sufficient for subatomic particle particles to penetrate deep into the hydrogen tablets and destroy as much as possible the number of subatomic particles in the tablets.  2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that protons are used as subatomic particles in the beams, which polarize in the same way as protons were polarized in hydrogen pellets, and provide the direction of proton motion in the beams that coincides with the direction of their rotation axes.  3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that as subatomic particles in the beams use electrons that polarize in the same way as polarized electrons in hydrogen tablets, and provide the direction of motion of the electrons in the beams, coinciding with the direction of the axes of their rotation.  4. The method according to claims 1 and 3, characterized in that the electrons in the beams polarize the opposite of how the polarized electrons in the tablets, and provide a direction of electron motion in the beams perpendicular to the axes of rotation of the electrons in the hydrogen tablets.  5. Installation for generating energy, containing a liquid hydrogen tank, a dispenser for pouring liquid hydrogen into the forming sleeves, a hydrogen-helium heat exchanger surrounded by an electromagnet, a helium re-cooling unit, a device for supplying hydrogen tablets to the active zone, a reaction chamber with a cooling path, a coolant circulation pump, a vacuum chamber, a vacuum pump, a coolant tank in which a steam-water system heat exchanger is mounted, a water pump, a working turbine coupled to an electric generator, a unit hydrogen ionization, characterized in that it is equipped with a distillation unit connected by highways to the liquid hydrogen tank and to the inlet of the dispenser, a hydrogen liquefaction device, the output of which is connected backbone to the liquid hydrogen tank, and the entrance to the device through a vacuum pump, vacuum chamber and valve connected to the reaction chamber, from which unreacted hydrogen enters, polarization-accelerating proton and electronic blocks, the inputs of which are connected to the ionization block, and the outputs are connected to the active this reaction chamber.

Images