PH12017000229A1 - Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens - Google Patents
Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- PH12017000229A1 PH12017000229A1 PH12017000229A PH12017000229A PH12017000229A1 PH 12017000229 A1 PH12017000229 A1 PH 12017000229A1 PH 12017000229 A PH12017000229 A PH 12017000229A PH 12017000229 A PH12017000229 A PH 12017000229A PH 12017000229 A1 PH12017000229 A1 PH 12017000229A1
- Authority
- PH
- Philippines
- Prior art keywords
- pathogens
- biocontrol
- composition
- yeast
- garlic
- Prior art date
Links
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 239000012681 biocontrol agent Substances 0.000 title abstract description 6
- 230000000443 biocontrol Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 240000007228 Mangifera indica Species 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 235000014826 Mangifera indica Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 235000004936 Bromus mango Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 240000008790 Musa x paradisiaca Species 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 235000018290 Musa x paradisiaca Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 235000009184 Spondias indica Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 240000002234 Allium sativum Species 0.000 claims abstract 7
- 235000004611 garlic Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract 7
- 241000369096 Citrus x microcarpa Species 0.000 claims abstract 5
- 235000002732 Allium cepa var. cepa Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 235000007688 Lycopersicon esculentum Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 240000003768 Solanum lycopersicum Species 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 244000105624 Arachis hypogaea Species 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 235000020232 peanut Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 235000014680 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nutrition 0.000 claims description 31
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000003042 antagnostic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 241000222120 Candida <Saccharomycetales> Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000235036 Debaryomyces hansenii Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241001302784 Kodamaea Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000235645 Pichia kudriavzevii Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000454 talc Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052623 talc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000228212 Aspergillus Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000228197 Aspergillus flavus Species 0.000 claims 5
- 241001507673 Penicillium digitatum Species 0.000 claims 4
- 241001529387 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Species 0.000 claims 3
- 241000222233 Colletotrichum musae Species 0.000 claims 3
- 241000234282 Allium Species 0.000 claims 2
- 241000589771 Ralstonia solanacearum Species 0.000 claims 2
- 235000014571 nuts Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 235000017060 Arachis glabrata Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 235000010777 Arachis hypogaea Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 235000018262 Arachis monticola Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 241000222199 Colletotrichum Species 0.000 claims 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 abstract description 13
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 abstract description 13
- 235000012055 fruits and vegetables Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 10
- 239000005557 antagonist Substances 0.000 abstract description 8
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000000575 pesticide Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 244000291564 Allium cepa Species 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 8
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 244000000003 plant pathogen Species 0.000 description 6
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000005253 yeast cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000006432 Carica papaya Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000009467 Carica papaya Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 244000000626 Daucus carota Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000002767 Daucus carota Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000220225 Malus Species 0.000 description 2
- 240000006365 Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000014787 Vitis vinifera Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008485 antagonism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002421 cell wall Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002101 lytic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000000190 yeast pathogen Species 0.000 description 2
- UHPMCKVQTMMPCG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5,8-dihydroxy-2-methoxy-6-methyl-7-(2-oxopropyl)naphthalene-1,4-dione Chemical compound CC1=C(CC(C)=O)C(O)=C2C(=O)C(OC)=CC(=O)C2=C1O UHPMCKVQTMMPCG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101000895977 Amycolatopsis orientalis Exo-beta-D-glucosaminidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000123650 Botrytis cinerea Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002566 Capsicum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000004160 Capsicum annuum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002567 Capsicum annuum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000012286 Chitinases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010022172 Chitinases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000005976 Citrus sinensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000002319 Citrus sinensis Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000000560 Citrus x paradisi Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001480643 Colletotrichum sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000588699 Erwinia sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010017533 Fungal infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000223218 Fusarium Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000286779 Hansenula anomala Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014683 Hansenula anomala Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000190144 Lasiodiplodia theobromae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000235048 Meyerozyma guilliermondii Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000031888 Mycoses Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 231100000678 Mycotoxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 241000228143 Penicillium Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000006002 Pepper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000016761 Piper aduncum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000017804 Piper guineense Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000203593 Piper nigrum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000008184 Piper nigrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000529919 Ralstonia sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000000111 Saccharum officinarum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007201 Saccharum officinarum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 206010040844 Skin exfoliation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000009754 Vitis X bourquina Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012333 Vitis X labruscana Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002009 allergenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000845 anti-microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001511 capsicum annuum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000416 exudates and transudate Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000013020 final formulation Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021022 fresh fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000002532 grape seed extract Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000009931 harmful effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000000010 microbial pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000013379 molasses Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002636 mycotoxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000024241 parasitism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008055 phosphate buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012794 pre-harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003223 protective agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000304 virulence factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004563 wettable powder Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medicines Containing Plant Substances (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
The application of yeast as biocontrol agent for postharvest diseases that reduces dependence to chemical pesticides. Specifically, a number of yeasts were selected, tested and proven to be effective against post-harvest pathogens of some fruits and vegetables such as mango, banana, calamansi, peanuts, onion, garlic and tomato. A number of yeast antagonist that exhibited biocontrol efficacy against the pathogens of the said commodities were identified and processed as biocontrol agent product.
Description
The formulation is a mixture of active ingredients such as yeast cells with the. inert material.
A final formulation is easy to handle, stable over a range temperature preferably, -5 to 35°C and have a minimum shelf-life of two years at —_— temperature.
Pichia kudriavzevii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Debaryomyces hansenii, =
Torulopsis candida and Kodamaea ohmerii are formulated as wettable powder using - talc as carrier. = : y
YEAST APPLICATION FOR BIOCONTROL OF POSTHARVEST ~~ “ PATHOGENS OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES =
;
The present invention relates to the biological control of plant pathogens (e.g. ~ postharvest pathogens) in agricultural commodities such as fruits and vegetables.
More particularly, this invention relates to: (1) method for biologically controlling *~ plant diseases, such as anthracnose on horticultural commodities using antagonistic = yeast isolated from the surface of fruits and vegetables; (2) compositions useful in the said methods, and; (3) products produced in such methods.
Postharvest decays of fruits and vegetables account for significant levels of postharvest losses. It is estimated that about 20-25% of the harvested fruits and vegetables are decayed by pathogens during postharvest handling even in developed countries. Postharvest diseases caused by microbial pathogens account for millions of dollars in losses of both durable and perishable products every year. These diseases consist of various fungal infections that rot fruits and vegetables after harvesting.
Farmers often rely heavily on the use of synthetic fungicides to control these plant diseases. However, the environmental problems caused by excessive use and misuse of synthetic fungicides have led to changes in people’s attitudes towards the use of chemicals in agriculture.
The use of synthetic fungicides has long been the most effective disease control method (Eckert and Ogawa, 1988; Snowdon, 1992). However, due to the increasing concern about the potential harmful effects of fungicides on the environment and human health and the development of fungicide resistance in pathogens, researchers are trying to find alternative means to control postharvest diseases (Ragsdale and Sisler, 1994; Conway et al, 2004). Fungicide residues in the fruit and their possible effects on human health and the environment, and the }
development of fungicide resistance by these pathogens have stimulated the. evaluation of alternative control methods that are effective and safe to use (Eckert, - 1990). -
The past two decades has seen a steady increase in the interest of finding - alternatives to the use of synthetic fungicides for postharvest disease control. In® particular this has led to considerable research on the use of microbial antagonists as protective agents. Recently, biological control has been developed as an alternative to synthetic fungicide treatments and considerable success has been achieved using” antagonistic microorganisms to control both preharvest and postharvest diseases (Janisiewicz and Korsten, 2002).
The use of naturally occurring yeasts has attracted special interest because of the special attributes yeasts have over filamentous fungi and bacteria. The advantage of using yeasts in biocontrol of foliar and postharvest diseases is caused by the fact that they are major component of the epiphytic microbial community on the surface of leaves, fruits and vegetables (Wilson and Wisniewski, 1989). They are effective as biocontrol agents because they are phenotypically adapted to these niches and are able to effectively colonize and compete for nutrients and space on fruit and leaf surfaces (McLaughlin et al, 1990; Filonow, 1998).
Yeasts generally do not produce allergenic spores or mycotoxins as many mycelial fungi do, or antibiotic metabolites likely to be produced by bacterial antagonists (Droby and Chalutz, 1994). Yeasts have simple nutritional requirements and are able to colonize dry surfaces for long periods of time, as well as withstand many pesticides used in the postharvest environment (El-Tarabily and
Sivasithamparam, 2006). They can grow rapidly on inexpensive substrates in fermenters and are therefore easy to produce in large quantities (Druvefors, 2004). -
Past studies suggested modes of action with regard to biocontrol yeasts indicated a lower likelihood of any hazards to consumers (Arras et al, 1999).
Wr
Competition for nutrients and space is believed to be the major mode of action. of antagonistic yeasts. Indeed, for these biocontrol agents, different mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms may be involved in the suppression of different plant diseases such as inhibition of the pathogen by antimicrobial compounds (antibiosis); = induction of plant resistant mechanisms; inactivation of pathogen germination factors - present in seed and root exudates and degradation of pathogenicity factors of the “pathogen such as toxins; and parasitism that may involve production of extracellular cell-wall degrading enzymes that can lyse pathogen cell walls. =
Antagonist-pathogen interaction has been shown to play a major role in biocontrol activities. Wisniewski et al. (2003) reported this kind of interaction between the yeast Pichia guilliermondii being intactly attached to the pathogen
Botrytis cinerea that even extensive washing with distilled water wouldn’t dislodge the attachment. Similar antagonist-pathogen interaction was exhibited by Pichia anomala which heavily colonized the hyphae of Botrydiplodia theobromae that caused swelling and beading until totally penetrated and destroyed (Mohammed and
Saad, 2009). In the presence of pathogen, the yeast cells produce lytic enzymes that can enhance the attachment ability of yeast to the hyphae of the pathogen (Wisniewski et al, 1991). The yeast-pathogen interaction is believed to be dependent on protein signal recognition between yeast cells and the hyphae of pathogens and attachment efficacy might be dependent on the secretion abilities of lytic enzymes such as B-1, 3-glucanase, exo-chitinase, and endo-chitinase (Chan and Tian, 2005).
There are various types of interactions between organisms from which arise the mechanism of biological control. Researchers thus, focused on characterization of the mechanism operating in different experimental set-ups. Yeast antagonism occurs in a spectrum of directionality and is associated with the amount of interspecies contact and specificity of the interactions (Nega, 2014). The narrow range of host - specification of antagonistic yeast limits its application as biocontrol agent in a wide array of plant diseases. This study addresses this problem by isolating and identifying yeast with antagonistic activity against some common postharvest pathogens specifically, Colletotrichum sp., Erwinia sp., Fusarium spp., Aspergillus sp,
Penicillium sp, Ralstonia sp., in the Philippine setting. -.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION t=
The present invention relates to a process of controlling plant pathogens by * application of antagonistic microorganisms comprising: the postharvest application = onto the agricultural commodities of at least one microorganism which is antagonistic = against plant pathogen. Wherein, the said microorganism is applied in an amount ol effective to control the diseases of agricultural commodities caused by pathogens. ~~
The second embodiment of the present invention relates to a process of application wherein the said antagonistic microorganisms against plant pathogen is applied as early as possible during postharvest.
The third embodiment of the invention relates to compositions which is effective in the execution of the said processes. Such composition include:
The composition comprising a mixture of, (1) at least one microorganism which is an antagonist against plant pathogen and, (2) a carrier for the said microorganism selected from the group consisting of a starch, talc, gum or mixtures therefore.
The composition wherein the microorganism is 10° to 108 colony forming unit per 20 grams of a carrier.
Biological control, especially using antagonists (mainly yeasts and bacteria) of the plant pathogens, has gained considerable attention and appears to be promising as a viable supplement or alternative to chemical control.
Isolation and identification of yeasts with potential antagonistic activity
Epiphytic yeasts are isolated from surfaces of fruits and vegetable. Sources of yeast isolates are eight species of tropical fruits and vegetable namely, apple (Malus y domestica), banana (Musa sapientum), grape (Vitis vinifera), orange (Citrus sinensis), o pepper (Capsicum annuum), papaya (Carica papaya), mango (Mangifera indica) and & carrot (Daucus carota) sourced from a public market. _
Initially, yeast isolation from fresh fruits is done by skin washing. The fruit - peelings are suspended for enrichment in 50 mL sterile phosphate buffer solution © (PBS) in sterile flasks and shaken vigorously for few minutes. Grape fruits are = suspended for enrichment in 50 mL sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) contained ® in a sterile plastic bag and aseptically scrubbed to dislodge yeast from the surface. ©
Serial ten-fold dilutions of the washings from each source are prepared in sterile PBS.
Screening for yeast antagonists )
The yeast-pathogen direct interaction in vitro is examined using a light microscope. A 6mm agar bloc of the fungus is placed on the center of a 9cm diameter plate and a 2cm streak of the yeast is place 3cm away from the agar bloc. The dual cultures are incubated until margins of fungal colony and yeast are in contact. The mold-yeast interaction is observed under a light microscope, (Leitz) at 400x magnification. The affinities of the yeast to colonize the fungal mycelia are recorded according to Hashem and Alamri (2009) rating system: - negative (no attachment), + sparse attachment (less than 10 cells per hypha), ++ loose attachment (10-50 cells per hypha), +++ heavy attachment (more than 50 cells per hypha).
Mass production of effective yeast antagonists
Yeast isolates that exhibit antagonism against a number of pathogens are selected for mass production. Pilot plant biomass production processes of the yeast antagonists are done using sugar cane molasses as substrate. The cells are grown aerobically in the shake flasks for 48 hrs and then harvested by centrifugation at ) 5000rpm for 10mins, wash twice in sterile distilled water and resuspended in PBS with 10% glycerol.
Claims (11)
1. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants comprising - a yeast species; and - a carrier. >»
2. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claim 1 wherein the plants are banana, tomato, mango, calamansi, garlic, onion, or _ peanut.
3. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claim 1 wherein the pathogen species are Colletotrichum musae, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Ralstonia solanacearum, Penicillium digitatum and Aspergillus flavus or a combination thereof.
4. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1 wherein the yeast species are Pichia kudriavzevii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Debaryomyces hansenii, -Turolopsis candida and Kodamaea ohmerii.or a ; 15 combination thereof.
5. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6 wherein, Pichia kudriavzevii is antagonistic against Colletotrichum musae in banana; Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato, Penicillium digitatum in calamansi and Aspergillus flavus in garlic.
6. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6 wherein Saccharomyces cerevisiae is antagonistic against * Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mango, Penicillium digitatum in calamansi and Aspergillus flavus in garlic.
7. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1, 2, | 4, and 6 wherein Debaryomyces hansenii is antagonistic against Colletotrichum musae in banana, Aspergillus flavus in garlic and nuts.
8. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1,2, 4, and 6 wherein Turolopsis candida is antagonistic against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mango and Aspergillus flavus in garlic and nuts.
9. A composition for biocontrol of pathogens in plants according to Claims 1, 2, 4, and 6 wherein Kodamaea ohmerii is antagonistic against Colletotrichum i T iat gloeosporioides in mango, Penicillium digitatum in calamansi, Aspergillus. flavus in garlic and onion. on
10. The composition according to Claim 1 in which, the concentration of the yeast. strain is 10° to 108 CFU per 20 g carrier. @
11. The composition according to Claim 1 wherein the carrier is talc. : :
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PH12017000229A PH12017000229A1 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2017-08-14 | Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PH12017000229A PH12017000229A1 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2017-08-14 | Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
PH12017000229A1 true PH12017000229A1 (en) | 2019-02-18 |
Family
ID=65479474
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PH12017000229A PH12017000229A1 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2017-08-14 | Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
PH (1) | PH12017000229A1 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1996013985A1 (en) * | 1994-11-07 | 1996-05-17 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture | Bioactive coating for harvested commodities |
US5741699A (en) * | 1991-08-16 | 1998-04-21 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Biological control of diseases of harvested agricultural commodities using strains of the yeast candida oleophila |
WO1998031229A1 (en) * | 1997-01-20 | 1998-07-23 | Agricultural Research Council | Method and composition for fruit disease control |
US6500425B1 (en) * | 1988-04-04 | 2002-12-31 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Inhibiting plant pathogens with an antagonistic microorganism(s) |
-
2017
- 2017-08-14 PH PH12017000229A patent/PH12017000229A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6500425B1 (en) * | 1988-04-04 | 2002-12-31 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Inhibiting plant pathogens with an antagonistic microorganism(s) |
US5741699A (en) * | 1991-08-16 | 1998-04-21 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Biological control of diseases of harvested agricultural commodities using strains of the yeast candida oleophila |
WO1996013985A1 (en) * | 1994-11-07 | 1996-05-17 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture | Bioactive coating for harvested commodities |
WO1998031229A1 (en) * | 1997-01-20 | 1998-07-23 | Agricultural Research Council | Method and composition for fruit disease control |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
US5741699 (wilson etal)-Whole document- 21 April 1998 (21.04.1998) * |
Yui etal, Response of Yeast Biocontrol Agents ..., AEM, Pg. 1-38-Whole document- 20 February 2015 (20.02.2015) * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Fernandez-San Millan et al. | Successful biocontrol of major postharvest and soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi by antagonistic yeasts | |
MohaMMadi et al. | Potential of some bacteria for biological control of postharvest citrus green mould caused by Penicillium digitatum | |
Liu et al. | Isolation, identification and in vitro screening of Chongqing orangery yeasts for the biocontrol of Penicillium digitatum on citrus fruit | |
Vinas et al. | Biological control of major postharvest pathogens on apple with Candida sake | |
Bautista-Rosales et al. | Action mechanisms of the yeast Meyerozyma caribbica for the control of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mangoes | |
Lima et al. | Activity of the yeasts Cryptococcus laurentii and Rhodotorula glutinis against post-harvest rots on different fruits | |
Wijesinghe et al. | Biological control of Thielaviopsis paradoxa on pineapple by an isolate of Trichoderma asperellum | |
Dal Bello et al. | Biocontrol of postharvest grey mould on tomato by yeasts | |
Delali et al. | Evaluation of yeast isolates from kimchi with antagonistic activity against green mold in citrus and elucidating the action mechanisms of three yeast: P. kudriavzevii, K. marxianus, and Y. lipolytica | |
Sangwanich et al. | Biocontrol of citrus green mould and postharvest quality parameters. | |
Ogwu | Effects of storage methods and duration on the microbial composition and load of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum [L.], Solanaceae) fruits | |
Peeran et al. | Water in oil based PGPR formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens (FP7) showed enhanced resistance against Colletotrichum musae | |
Granado et al. | Culturable fungi of stored ‘golden delicious’ apple fruits: a one-season comparison study of organic and integrated production systems in Switzerland | |
WO2018047123A1 (en) | Biological control of plant pathogenic microorganisms | |
Farahani et al. | Effect of two strains of antagonistic yeasts in combination with silicon against two isolates of Penicillium expansum on apple fruit | |
Alsohiby et al. | Screening of soil isolates of bacteria for antagonistic activity against plant pathogenic fungi | |
US20210380931A1 (en) | Biological Control of Plant Pathogenic Microorganisms | |
Sipiczki | Identification of antagonistic yeasts as potential biocontrol agents: Diverse criteria and strategies | |
PH12017000229A1 (en) | Yeast as biocontrol agent for pathogens | |
Mašková et al. | Monitoring of microscopic fungi community in selected bee products. | |
Wisniewski et al. | Biopreservation of food and feed by postharvest biocontrol with microorganisms | |
Nandhini et al. | Antagonistic activity of epiphytic yeast against grapes mold caused by Rhizopus sp. | |
Csutak et al. | Influence of sodium bicarbonate, calcium chloride and growth media on antimicrobial activity of Metschnikowia pulcherrima | |
Archer | The Use of Honeybees as a Transfer Vector for Control of Core Rot in Apples | |
Jidda et al. | Rot inducing fungi of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) fruits in storage and fruit stalls in Maiduguri, Nigeria |