OA18995A - Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance - Google Patents

Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
OA18995A
OA18995A OA1201600320 OA18995A OA 18995 A OA18995 A OA 18995A OA 1201600320 OA1201600320 OA 1201600320 OA 18995 A OA18995 A OA 18995A
Authority
OA
OAPI
Prior art keywords
geocell
cell
strip
cell strip
minutes
Prior art date
Application number
OA1201600320
Inventor
Oded Erez
Izhar Halahmi
Original Assignee
Geotech Technologies Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Geotech Technologies Ltd filed Critical Geotech Technologies Ltd
Publication of OA18995A publication Critical patent/OA18995A/en

Links

Abstract

Geocells are disclosed herein that are made from polymeric strips having improved compaction and deformation resistance. The compaction resistance refers to the deformation of the geocell during installation, when the geocell is being infilled. The deformation resistance refers to the deformation of the geocell during service, which is simulated using procedures described herein.

Description

GEOCELL WITH IMPROVED COMPACTION AND DEFORMATION RESISTANCE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/939,198, filed February 12, 2014. This application is fully incorporated by reference herein.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The présent disclosure refers to geocells which hâve improved compaction and deformation résistance.
[0003] In transport engineering, several layers are recognized in the construction of a pavement. These layers include the subgrade layer, the sub-base layer, the base layer, and the paver or surface layer. The subgrade layer is the native material and acts as the foundation for the pavement. Usually, the soil and loose material on the surface of the ground is dug away or otherwise removed in order to expose the subgrade layer.The subbase layer is laid over the subgrade, and acts as a load-bearing layer. The sub-base layer spreads load evenly over the subgrade layer, and can also be used to form a level surface. The base layer is laid over the sub-base layer, and is used to carry load. Depending on the desired use of the pavement, another layer can be placed over the base layer, and this layer may be known as a paver base layer. The paver or surface layer is then placed on top of this, and is the exposed layer on the surface of the pavement. The surface layer can be, for example, asphalt (e.g. a road or parking lot) or concrète (e.g. a sidewalk).
[0004] Paved roads and railways are very sensitive to plastic deformations in their base and/or sub-base. Strains of 1-3 percent in these two layers can cause cracking in an asphalt surface layer (roads), and can cause distortion of rails (railways).
[0005] Geocells hâve been used for many years in érosion control and soil stabilization on slopes. The geocell acts as a container for infill, slowing its érosion, but not increasing its elastic modulus. Geocells are used sometimes for temporary pavements, mostly with sand, but the design life of such temporary pavements is limited to a few months at most.
[0006] Long-lasting pavements, such as railways, concrète surfaced and asphalt aggregate surfaced roads, usually fail due to yield of the surface layer, leading to cracking and rutting. A major cause of surface layer yield is poor strength, poor stiffness, and/or poor long-term stability of the base and/or sub-base. This causes deformation at the bottom of the surface layer,
[0007] Typically, surface layer failures begin at deformations in the range of 2-4%, in either the base or the sub-base. Prior art geocells hâve been used for stabilizing the base or sub-base, but hâve failed to meet this requirement, even in low traffic situations.
[0008] There is a need for geocells that are capable of providing sufficient confinement to infill during installation, and later, during service, while limiting plastic (un-recoverable, non-elastic) deformations to a level guaranteeing stability of concrète or asphalt based surface layers or railways. Such geocells need to be able to develop sufficient stiffness to infill during installation, and to retain their dimensional stability for many vehicle passages.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0009] The présent disclosure relates to geocells that are suitable for reinforcing and confining infill for road bases or railway bases. Generally speaking, a geocell expériences high transient load during installation, when the geocell is filled with infill and subjected to compaction. A geocell also expériences constant repeated loads during service, when vehicles apply load thereon. The geocells of the present disclosure resist deformation during installation, and/or during service. This property can be tested for as described herein.
[0010] Generally, the geocells of the present disclosure hâve a deformation of at most 3.5% during installation. When visually inspected, no local stress concentrations or plastic yield evidence are visible.
[0011] Generally, the geocells of the present disclosure hâve a deformation of at most 3% during service. Again, when visually inspected, no local stress concentrations or plastic yield evidence are visible.
[0012] These and other non-limiting aspects of the disclosure are described in more detail below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] The following is a brief description of the drawings, which are presented for the purposes of illustrating the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and not for the purposes of limiting the same.
[0014] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a geocell of the present disclosure in its expanded state.
[0015] FIG. 2 is a close-up perspective view of a polymeric strip of the present disclosure used to make the perforated geocell.
[0016] FIG. 3 is a picture of a testing chamber containing two strips eut from a geocell cell wall, installée! and clamped.
[0017] FIG. 4 is a picture showing three strips after loading for testing deformation during installation, the left (brown) and center (black) strips being prior art and the right strip (gray) being ofthe presentdisclosure.
[0018] FIG. Sis a picture showing two strips after loading in the middle of testing deformation during service, the right strip (black) being prior art and the left strip (gray) being ofthe present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] A more complété understanding of the components, processes and apparatuses disclosed herein can be obtained by reference to the accompanying drawings. These figures are mereiy schematic représentations based on convenience and the ease of demonstrating the present disclosure, and are, therefore, not întended to indicate relative size and dimensions of the devices or components thereof and/or to define or limit the scope of the exemplary embodiments.
[0020] Although spécifie terms are used in the following description for the sake of clarity, these terms are întended to refer only to the particular structure ofthe embodiments selected for illustration in the drawings, and are not întended to define or limit the scope of the disclosure. In the drawings and the following description below, it is to be understood that like numeric désignations refer to components of like function.
[0021] The singular forms a, an, and the include plural referents unless the context clearly dictâtes otherwise.
[0022] Numerical values in the spécification and claims of this application should be understood to include numerical values which are the same when reduced to the same number of significant figures and numerical values which differ from the stated value by less than the experimental error of conventional measurement technique of the type described in the present application to determine the value.
[0023] Ail ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the recited endpoint and independently combinable (for example, the range of “from 2 mm to 10 mm is inclusive of the endpoints, 2 mm and 10 mm, and ail the intermediate values).
[0024] A value modified by a term or terms, such as “about and “substantially, may not be limited to the précisé value specified. The modifier “about should also be considered as disclosing the range defined by the absolute values of the two endpoints. For example, the expression “from about 2 to about 4” also discloses the range from 2 to 4.’’The term “about” may refer to plus or minus 10% ofthe indicated number.
[0025] Geocells (also known as cellular confinement Systems (CCS)) are a threedimensional geosynthetic product which are useful in many geotechnical applications such as soil érosion prévention, channel lining, construction of reinforced soil retaining walls, and support of pavements. A CCS is an array of containment cells resembling a “honeycomb structure that is filled with infill, which can be cohesionless soil, sand, loam, quarry waste, gravel, ballast, or any other type of aggregate. CCSs are used in civil engineering applications to prevent érosion or provide latéral support, such as retaining walls for soil, alternatives for sandbag walls or gravity walls, and for roadway, pavement, and railway foundations. For contrast, geogrids are generally fiat (i.e., two-dimensional) and used as planar reinforcement, whereas CCSs are three-dimensional structures with internai force vectors acting within each cell against ail the walls. A geocell and a geogrid can also be distinguished by their vertical height. A geocell has a vertical height of at least 20 mm, whereas a geogrid has a vertical height of from about 0.5 mm to 2 mm.
[0026] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a geocell in its expanded state. The geocell 10 comprises a plurality of polymeric strips 14. Adjacent strips are bonded together along discrète physical seams 16. The bonding may be performing by bonding, sewing or welding, but is generally done by welding. The portion of each strip between two seams 16 forms a cell wall 18 of an individual cell 20. Each cell 20 has cell walls made from two different polymeric strips. The strips 14 are bonded together so that when expanded, a honeycomb pattern is formed from the plurality of strips. For example, outside strip 22 and inside strip 24 are bonded together at seams 16 which are regularly spaced along the length of strips 22 and 24. A pair of inside strips 24 is bonded together along seams 32. Each seam 32 is between two seams 16. As a resuit, when the plurality of strips 14 is stretched or expanded in a direction perpendicular to the faces of the strips, the strips bend in a sinusoïdal manner to form the geocell 10. At the edge ofthe geocell where the ends of two polymeric strips 22, 24 meet, an end weld 26 (also considered a joint) is made a short distance from the end 28 to form a short tail 30 which stabilizes the two polymeric strips 22,
24. This geocell may also be referred to as a section, particularly when combined with other geocells over a larger area than could be practically covered by a single section.
[0027] FIG. 2 is a close-up perspective view of a polymeric strip 14 showing the length 40, height 42, and width 44, with a seam 16 illustrated for reference. The length 40, height 42, and width 44are measured in the direction indicated. The length is measured when the geocell is in its folded or compressed state. In the compressed state, each cell 20 may be considered to hâve no volume, whereas the expanded state generally refers to when the geocell has been expanded to its maximum possible capacity. In embodiments, the geocell height 43 is from about 50 millimeters (mm) to about 200 mm. The geocell cell size (measured as the distance between seams in the un-folded state) can be from about 200 mm to about 600 mm.
[0028] The geocells can be made from polyethylene (PE), medium density polyethylene (MDPE), high density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP) and/or blends of polyolefins with a polyamide or a polyester. The term HDPE refers hereinafter to a polyethylene characterized by density of greater than 0.940 g/cm3. The term medium density polyethylene (MDPE) refers to a polyethylene characterized by density of greater than 0.925 g/cm3 to 0.940 g/cm3. The term linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) refers to a polyethylene characterized by density of 0.91 to 0.925 g/cm3. The strips are welded together in an offset manner, with the distance between welded seams being from about 200 mm to about 600 mm.
[0029] The usual strip wall thickness for a geocell is 1.27 millimeters (mm), with some variation in the range of 1.0 mm to 1.7 mm. The cell walls can be perforated and/or embossed.
[0030] The present geocells hâve low deformation during installation. A given geocell can be tested for deformation during installation using the following procedure. First, a cell strip is obtained from the geocell. This cell strip is essentially a cell wall that, referring to FIG. 1, extends from seam 16 to seam 16 (not seam 32). The length of this cell strip is the distance between the seams, and the width of this cell strip is equal to the cell height (direction 42 in FIG. 2). The cell strip is clamped between an upper clamp and a lower clamp, with the clamps being placed along the seams, so that the length of the cell strip extends between the clamps. The upper clamp is static and is attached to a frame. In contrast, the lower clamp is free and is able to swing. A load can be applied to the lower clamp, and during testing is used to deform the strip. A load of 6.1 kN/meter is then applied to the lower clamp, perpendicular to the seams of the cell strip. This load is applied at ambient température (23°C ± 3°) for 90 minutes to simulate deformation during installation (refer as installation strain). After the 90 minutes are complété, the total deformation is measured. The percentage of deformation is obtained by dividing the total deformation by the original cell strip length. The geocells of the present disclosure hâve aninstallation strain of at most 3.5%. In a spécifie embodiment, when improved stability is required, the installation strain is at most 3%. The cell strip should also be free from local plastic yield evidence (when inspected visually).
[0031] In this regard, the 6.1 KN/m load is calculated from stresses in typical base design during the compaction phase (when infill is being added and compacted in the geocell). The 90-minute time period simulâtes the typical period sufficient to achieve stable and predictable interaction between the infill and the geocell (compaction plus confinement).
[0032] Some deformation during installation is usually required to ensure sufficient confinement of the infill.However, deformation of greater than about 3.5% during installation causes two undesirable phenomena: (a) irréversible plastic yield in the geocell in perforated areas, making said areas sensitive to prématuré crazing during service: and (b) insufficient infill confinement, leading to poor base or sub-base stiffness, poor ability to withstand repeating loadings, and unwanted flow of infill downwards and horizontally.Prior art geocells deform significantly higher during this installation step, typîcally 6% or greater.Moreover, areas of high perforation in prior art geocells, characterized by severe plastic yield, may later fail catastrophically during service. In this regard, it is noted that a cell strip is tested, and for purposes of convenience the performance of the cell strip is attributed to the geocell as well.
[0033] FIG. 3 is a picture of a chamber that contains two cell strips eut from a geocell, installed and clamped. A load is applied to an arm extending downwards from the lower clamp. An accurate deflectometer is mounted to the chamber frame, with its metering tiptouching a plate extending from the load.The deformation can be read on the deflectometer gauge, at spécifie time slots, during the deformation under load test
[0034] FIG. 4 is a picture of three different cell strips which hâve been tested for deformation during installation. The left strip and the center strip are prior art strips. The left strip has a thickness of 1.5 mm and is made of HDPE. The center strip has a thickness of 1.6 mm and îs also made of HDPE. Deformation is visually évident and perforations hâve deformed irreversibly. Clear marks of yield and cold flow near perforations are also observed. These twocell strips hâve undergone plastic yield and are not recommended for long-term service in bases or sub-bases. This is due to the fact that polymers are known to be subject to crazing (unpredictable catastrophic failure under load) after plastic yielding. This kind of deformation, within only 90 minutes, is unacceptable and these prior art geocells are not suitable for base reinforcement.
[0035] The rightmost strip is a cell strip according to the present disclosure, and has a thickness of 1.4 mm. The geocell is made of a low creep blend of HDPE and a polyamide, and the perforation pattern is optimized to avoid local plastic yield. The deformation is much lower, perforations are unchanged, and the strip has not undergone plastic yield. As a resuit, this strip can be recommended for long-term service in bases or sub-bases.
[0036] Desirably, the geocells of the present disclosure are suitable for reinforcing and confining road bases,road sub-bases, industrial floors, pavements over expansive clay, railway bases, or railway sub-bases subjected to heavy and medium traffic. Such geocells hâve low deformation during service. A given geocell can be tested for deformation during service using the following procedure. First, a cell strip is obtained from the geocell. This strip is essentially a cell wall that, referring to FIG. 1, extends from seam 16 to seam 16 (not seam 32). The length of this strip is the distance between the seams, and the width of this strip is equal to the cell height (direction 42 in FIG. 2). The cell strip is clamped between an upper clamp and a lower clamp, with the clamps being placed along the seams, so that the length of the strip extends between the clamps. The upper clamp is static and is attached to a frame. In contrast, the lower clamp is free and is able to swing. The cell strip is usually contained in a chamber which is capable of heating and maintaining its température within a range of ± 1°C (i.e. the température of the air in the chamber). A load can be applied to the lower clamp, and during testing is used to deform the cell strip. A load of 6.1kN/meter is then applied to the lower clamp, perpendicularto the seams of the cell strip. This load is applied at ambient température (23°C ± 3°) for 90 minutes to allow for deformation of the strip.
[0037] After the 90 minutes are complété, the chamber is heated to 44°C. A period of
15minutes passes to let the strip reach a homogeneous température. The deflectometer is reset to zéro. The load of 6.1 kN/meter is then applied for 167 minutes at 44°C. The deformation ofthe cell strip after 167 minutes at 44°C is then measured and recorded. The cell strip can be visually inspected for local plastic yield evidence and local stress concentrations.
[0038] Next, the chamber is heated to 51 °C. A period of 15 minutes passes to let the cell strip reach a homogeneous température. The deflectometer is reset to zéro. The load of 6.1 kN/meter is then applied for 167 minutes at 51 °C. The deformation of the cell strip after 167 minutes at 51°C is then measured and recorded.The cell strip can be visually inspected for local plastic yield evidence and local stress concentrations.
[0039] Next, the chamber is heated to 58°C. A period of 15 minutes passes to let the cell strip reach a homogeneous température. The deflectometer is reset to zéro. The load of 6.1 kN/meter is then applied for 167 minutes at 58°C. The deformation of the cell strip after 167 minutes at 58°C is then measured and recorded.The cell strip can be visually inspected for local plastic yield evidence and local stress concentrations.
[0040] The percentage of deformation is then obtained by dividing the total deformation by the original strip length. As described above, the total deformation is obtained by summing the deformation of the cell strip at 44°C, the deformation ofthe cell strip at 5ΓΟ, and the deformation of the cell strip at 58°C. The accumulated strain is referred as service strain.The geocells of the présent disclosure hâve a service strain of at most 3%. The cell strip should also be free from local plastic yield evidence (when inspected visually). Inspecific embodiments, when improved stability is required, the cell striphas a service strain of at most 2.5%.
[0041] It should be noted that the températures of 44°C, 51°C, and 58°C refer to the température to which the chamber is heated, i.e. the air in the chamber. Generally, the strip reaches equilibrium with the chamber température within about 15 minutes from the start of the cycle.
[0042] This procedure is modified from ASTM D6992, and is supported by a method known as Stepped Isothermal Method (SIM). The number and duration of steps is calculated to simulate traffic passages typical to medium and medium-heavy traffic.
[0043] As described above, the load is not removed during équilibration to the new higher température.
[0044] Also as described above, the deflectometer is reset as the chamber is set to the new higher température. In some embodiments, the deflectometer is not reset, and the total deformation is the deformation measured after the heating at 58°C.
[0045] FIG. 5 is a picture showing two cell strips during the 44°C heating step, which represents a time of about 10% of the service life. The right strip is a prior art strip, and has severe plastic deformation. At this stage, the deformation is more than 25%. The left strip is a cell strip of the present disclosure, and has deformed less than 0.2%, and has not 5 exhibited Visual evidence of distortions. This behavior was retained until the end of the test, and the total deformation for the left strip was 1.4% of the original distance between clamps. No Visual evidence of distortions was seen in the left strip.
[0046] The present disclosure has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading 10 and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the present disclosure be construed as including ail such modifications and alterations insofar as they corne within the scope of the appended claims or the équivalents thereof.

Claims (10)

  1. CLAIMS:
    1. A geocell formed from a plurality of polymeric strips, adjacent strips being bonded together along seams to form a plurality of cells having cell walls when stretched in a direction perpendicular to the faces of the strips;
    wherein a cell strip of the geocell is characterized by an installation strain of at most 3.5%.
  2. 2. The geocell of claim 1, wherein the cell strip of the geocell is characterized by an installation strain of at most 3.0%.
  3. 3. The geocell of claim 1, wherein the cell strip of the geocell is characterized by an installation strain of at most2.5%.
  4. 4. A geocell formed from a plurality of polymeric strips, adjacent strips being bonded together along seams to form a plurality of cells having cell walls when stretched in a direction perpendicular to the faces of the strips;
    wherein a cell strip of the geocell has a service strain of at most 3.0%.
  5. 5. The geocell of claim 4, wherein the cell strip of the geocell has a service strain of at most 2.5%.
  6. 6. The geocell of claim 4, wherein the service strainis measured according to the following procedure:
    obtaining the cell strip which is eut from one seam of a cell wall to the other seam of the cell wall, with the cell strip length being the distance between the seams, and the cell strip width being equal to the cell height;
    clamping the cell strip between an upper clamp and a lower clamp, wherein the upper clamp is static and attached to a frame, the lower clamp is free and can be loaded with a weight, and the clamps are located within a chamber that permits température régulation;
    applying a load of 6.1 kN/meter to the lower clamp and perpendicular to the seams of the cell strip for 90 minutes at ambient température;
    heating the chamber to 44°C and waiting for 15 minutes to allow the cell strip to reach a homogeneous température;
    applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter to the lower clamp and perpendicular to the seams of the cell strip for 167 minutes at 44°C;
    measuring the deformation of the cell strip at 44°C;
    heating the chamber to 51 °C and waiting for 15 minutes to allow the cell strip to reach a homogeneous température;
    applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter to the lower clamp and perpendicular to the seams ofthe cell strip for 167 minutes at51°C;
    measuring the deformation ofthe cell strip at 51°C;
    heating the chamber to 58°C and waiting for 15 minutes to allow the cell strip to reach a homogeneous température;
    applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter to the lower clamp and perpendicular to the seams of the cell strip for 167 minutes at 58°C; and measuring the deformation of the cell strip at 58°C; and dividing the total deformation of the cell stripby the original distance between the upper and lower clamps to obtain the service strain.
  7. 7. The geocell of claim 6, wherein the load of 6.1 kN/meter is removed from the lower clamp when the chamber is heated to 44°C, when the chamber is heated to 5ΓΟ, and when the chamber is heated to 51 °C.
  8. 8. The geocell of claim 6, wherein the load of 6.1 kN/meter is not removed from the lower clamp when the chamber is heated to 44°C, when the chamber is heated to 51°C, or when the chamber is heated to 51°C.
  9. 9. The geocell of claim 6, wherein the service strain is the value obtained after measuring the deformation of the cell strip at 58°C.
  10. 10. The geocell of claim 6, wherein the service strainis measured using a deflectometer;
    wherein the deflectometer is reset to zéro prier to applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter for 167 minutes at 44°C;
    wherein the deflectometer is reset to zéro prior to applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter for 167 minutes at 51 °C; and wherein the deflectometer is reset to zéro prior to applying the load of 6.1 kN/meter for 167 minutes at 58°C; and wherein the total deformation is obtained by summing the deformations of the strip at44°C, 51°C,and 58°C.
OA1201600320 2014-02-12 2015-02-12 Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance OA18995A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61/939,198 2014-02-12

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
OA18995A true OA18995A (en) 2019-11-22

Family

ID=

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2022201815B2 (en) Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance
US10753049B2 (en) Pavement systems with geocell and geogrid
Pokharel et al. Experimental evaluation of geocell-reinforced bases under repeated loading
Bathurst et al. Large-scale model tests of geocomposite mattresses over peat subgrades
Siabil et al. Response of pavement foundations incorporating both geocells and expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam
Yang et al. Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocell-reinforced sand bases
Thakur et al. Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading
Tafreshi et al. Combining EPS geofoam with geocell to reduce buried pipe loads and trench surface rutting
Pokharel et al. Experimental study on bearing capacity of geocell-reinforced bases
Pokharel et al. Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular bases under static and repeated loads
Baral et al. The use of polymeric and metallic geogrid on a full-scale MSE wall/embankment on hard foundation: a comparison of field data with simulation
AU2024219469A1 (en) Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance
OA18995A (en) Geocell with improved compaction and deformation resistance
Christoforidou Use of geosynthetics on subgrade and on low and variable fill foundation
Kim et al. Development of Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines for Pavement Embankment Construction in North Georgia
Bortz et al. Accelerated pavement testing of low-volume paved roads with geocell reinforcement
Hanandeh Performance Evaluation of Instrumented Geosynthetics Reinforced Paved Test Sections Built Over Weak Subgrade Using Accelerated Load Testing
WILLIAMS Performance evaluation of geogrid-reinforced pavement foundations
White et al. Subgrade Stabilization Using Geosynthetics."
Tafreshi et al. Repeated load response of square footings on geocell reinforced soil: Comparing use of single and multiple layered geocells
Kiptoo et al. Geogrid and geotextile reinforced base on a soft subgrade soil
Sharbaf et al. Laboratory evaluation of triangular aperture geogrid reinforced flexible pavements
BRIEF Geocell Reinforcement of Subbase