NZ784133A - Block-free lens support for lenses surfacing - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a lens supporting part (100) for supporting a lens (L) in a surface machining process, in which one (L1) of two opposite side surfaces (L1, L2) of the lens (L) is processed. The lens supporting part (100) comprises a plurality of support elements (110) that are relatively moveable with respect to each other and that together form a lens seat (120) with a curvature for supporting the lens (L) on its other side surface (L2) against forces generated in the surface machining process. The lens supporting part (100) comprises an adjustment mechanism (130) for displacing during processing at least some of the support elements (110) relatively to each other to adjust the curvature of the lens seat (120) to a defined curvature independently from a lens (L) being seated on the support elements (110). The invention is also directed to a system (500) and a method for surface processing at least one of the side surfaces (L1, L2) of a lens (L) that utilize the lens supporting part (100) of the invention, respectively. veable with respect to each other and that together form a lens seat (120) with a curvature for supporting the lens (L) on its other side surface (L2) against forces generated in the surface machining process. The lens supporting part (100) comprises an adjustment mechanism (130) for displacing during processing at least some of the support elements (110) relatively to each other to adjust the curvature of the lens seat (120) to a defined curvature independently from a lens (L) being seated on the support elements (110). The invention is also directed to a system (500) and a method for surface processing at least one of the side surfaces (L1, L2) of a lens (L) that utilize the lens supporting part (100) of the invention, respectively.

Description

BLOCK-FREE LENS SUPPORT FOR LENSES SURFACING Field of the invention The present ion relates to a lens supporting part for ting a lens against forces caused in a surface machining process, in which one of two opposite side surfaces of the lens is processed. The invention also relates to a system and method for a lens surface machining process, in which the lens supporting part is used, respectively.

Technical background Any discussion of the prior art throughout the specification should in no way be considered as an admission that such prior art is widely known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field.

The manufacturing of modern custom-made eyeglass prescription lenses requires an individualized machining process, in which it is not only possible to tailor lenses to a single prescription recipe but also to the skull morphology of the customer as well as specific geometric features of the frame chosen by the customer.

Commonly, lens blanks with different front ures are used in the cturing process of lenses. Therein, lens blanks for divergent and for convergent lenses exist. Typically, the front surface of a lens blank is finished so that no ment of the curvature or ing is required on the front surface. The manufacturing process is started by choosing a lens blank with a front e most suitable for the requirements of the ation. Thereafter, the rear surface of the lens blank is processed to customize the lens, whereby a determination of how to process the rear surface in order to generate a lens with the desired shape is based on the shape of the front surface.

While it is an advantage of this approach that only one side has to be processed, it also visualises the importance of the front surface maintaining its shape hout the entire manufacturing process to arrive at a lens with the desired shape.

In the cturing process, the shape of the lens is adapted by generating (thickness) differences in the curvature between the lens’ front and rear surface in order to change the way the finished lens will change the course of light. The difference in curvature between the front and rear surface of the lens leads to its corrective power. Accordingly, the location of areas of different esses will vary depending on the customer. Unfortunately, the areas of ent thicknesses show different mechanical reactions when being d to machining and clamping forces. For examples, thin areas are more sensitive to the machining and clamping forces while thicker areas are more resilient and thus, are less prone to being bent or deformed. Accordingly, if such differences in the lens’ ability for dissipating mechanical stress are ted, it can lead to irregularities in the power map of the lens and thereby, eventually to the production of a lens that is out tolerance.

Therefore, there is a need to provide ient mechanical support to the front surface of the lens while its rear e is machined in order to reduce the impact of the manufacturing s on the lens quality.

In the prior art, this m has been addressed by attaching the front surface of the lens blank to a surfacing block with a bonding material, such as an adhesive, e.g. resin, glue or low melting alloy. Typically, the surfacing block remains attached to the lens throughout the entire lens generation process and the various machines involved in the process have a universal clamping system that facilitates to fix the surfacing block to the respective machine. Thereby, the surfacing block can be used also for handling the lens and as reference point in all machining steps. The surfacing block with the adhesive allows to keep a convex e stable under the action of the machining forces and also against deformation caused by inner tensions in the lens material. This known solution is most ly found in lens manufacturing applications.

However, such known solutions are disadvantageous, as they require connecting and disconnecting the surfacing block from the lens, which is a complex and costly process that becomes even more complicated when lenses of various shapes and curvatures are to be ted. Also, they require the use of special blocking and de-blocking appliances as well as special substances, such as adhesives, solvents, and water. Moreover, throughput times are reduced. Accordingly, such solutions are not suitable for producing different lenses with different curvatures and different power maps from lens blanks in quick succession.

In the prior art, attempts have been made to me some of these disadvantages by using dedicated surfacing blocks that have a predefined curvature for receiving a lens blank with exactly the same curvature. The lens blank can be attached to the surfacing block through the application of suction forces.

While the problem of how to simplify ting and disconnecting the lens from the surfacing block can be sed with this solution, a high number of such surfacing blocks would be ed to provide a suitable surfacing block for every conceivable lens curvature.

Consequently, the shape of the surfacing block frequently does not fit to the lens blank. This leads to manufacturing errors and a reduction in accuracy and quality of the finished lens because the lens blank is insufficiently supported during the manufacturing process. er, it was found that with this solution the strength of the vacuum is often icient for processing the lens with high machining speeds.

Alternative ons exist in the prior art that attempt to overcome the aforementioned disadvantages by providing a surfacing block with a t for the front surface of the lens, against which the lens blank is pressed by ting a suction force. The support has the ability to copy the front curve of the lens blank once. After the step of deforming the lens support is completed, the t is fixed so that its shape is kept in place for the rest of the subsequent machining steps. Any further deformation of the lens support during the processing is not possible with this known solution.

However, it has been found that this solution is insufficient for providing a lens that achieves the required high quality standards. In particular, often the lens is insufficiently and without the required cy supported by such surfacing blocks during the surface processing.

As a result, the lens is deformed by forces ng during the machining process. However, as described above, the precision of the finished lens is dependent on the stability of the front surface. Any deformation of the existing front surface that may be caused from machining the lens can add errors to the final lens power.

Forces that could affect the lens arise either directly from the machining process, such as forces generated by a suction or clamping system for securing the lens via its front surface or machining/cutting forces. However, also inner tensions in the lens material can cause deformations. Particularly, since the lens is relatively thin and of a deformable material, such forces can have a strong impact on the shape of the surfaces of the lens.

For example, if inner tensions exist in an unprocessed lens blank, initially, they are evenly distributed over the entire thickness of the raw lens blank and thus, do not have any or have only a very small impact on the shape of the lens blank. However, during the machining process, material is removed in parts of the lens blank while other parts are not processed yet.

Accordingly, tensions inside the processed lens blank are unevenly distributed and thus, can generate deformations in the lens shape. Consequently, at the end of the machining process, the final shape of the lens’ front surface will differ from the original shape, which -as described above- was used lly for determining the processing steps of the rear surface. Thus, a power map error results because the desired power map is based on the al) shape of the front surface of the blank and not on the (deformed) shape of the ed lens. Figures 2 illustrate this situation exemplarily by showing the shape of a lens (L) before starting a surface sing step (Figure 2A) and the shape of the lens (L) at the end of the surface sing step (Figure 2B).

Ideally, the front surface (L2) would remain the same throughout the process while only the shape of the rear surface (L1) changes from its original shape (L1) to the new shape (L11).

This may lead to the in Figures 2A and 2B arily illustrated phenomena that at the beginning of the machining process of the lens’ rear e (L1), the lens blank (L) may match the shape of the deformable t block (B100) perfectly (see Figure 2A) while at the end of a processing step (see Figure 2B), not only the shape of the rear surface (L11) but also the shape of the front surface (L2) may have changed so that a gap (G) between the front surface (L2) of the lens (L) and the deformable support block (B100) exists. Thereby, the t capabilities of the deformable support block (B100) for the lens (L) during subsequent surface processing is reduced. This may lead to deformation of the front surface (L2) of the lens (L) through operating forces during machining of the rear surface of the lens blank (L1, L11). Also, lens holding forces generated with a suction pump can cause deformations.

Moreover, it has to be considered that deformable lens supports are commonly ed with a rubber coating to avoid scratching the already finished front surface of the lens blank.

However, these rubber coatings may be subject to locally varying deformation under the effect of operating forces and/or clamping forces, thereby introducing flexibility and instability in the support of the lens blank during the machining process.

It is an object of the present invention to me or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art, or to provide a useful alternative.

It is an object of the t invention to provide a part, system and method for processing a surface of a lens that overcome the known disadvantages of the prior art, respectively. Therein, it is a particular object of the ion to provide a rigid support for the front surface of the lens that is actively adaptable throughout the processing of the lens and that allows to t and to disconnect the lens from the support with minimal effort. Therein, it is a particular object to provide a solution that is suitable for adjusting the lens support automatically and in a short time.

These and other objects, which become apparent upon reading the description, are solved by the subject-matter of the independent claims. The dependent claims refer to preferred embodiments of the invention.

Summary of the invention According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a lens supporting part for supporting a lens in a e machining process, in which one of two opposite side surfaces of the lens is processed, wherein the lens supporting part comprises - a plurality of t elements being relatively moveable with respect to each other and er forming a lens seat with a curvature for supporting the lens on its other side surface against forces caused in the surface machining process, and - an adjustment mechanism for displacing at least some of the plurality of support elements relatively to each other during processing to adjust the ure of the lens seat to a defined curvature ndently from a lens being seated on the support elements.

A first aspect of the present invention relates to a lens supporting part for supporting a lens in a surface machining process, in which one of two opposite side surfaces of the lens is processed. The lens supporting part comprises a plurality of support elements that are vely moveable with respect to each other. The support elements form together a lens seat with a ure for supporting the lens on its other side surface against forces caused in the surface machining s. The lens supporting part r comprises an adjustment ism for displacing at least some of the plurality of support elements relatively to each other during processing to adjust the curvature of the lens seat to a defined curvature independently from a lens being seated on the support elements.

In other words: the invention es a lens supporting part that is suitable for being used in a surface machining process of a lens. The process may comprise, for example, any ing or manufacturing step(s) for the generation of optical devices, such as roughing (i.e. grinding of a lens surface to the approximate curvature and thickness), smoothing (i.e. grinding of a lens surface to the exact curvature and thickness), polishing (i.e. making the lens smooth; providing regular ission as well as specular reflection) and/or bevelling (i.e. g the lens to the shape of eyeglass ). Generally, a “lens” may be understood, for example, as any transmissive optical device that is adapted to change the course of light by refraction. For example, the lens may be an ophthalmologic lens, such as corrective or iption lenses. The lens may have two opposite side surfaces and a circumferential edge. Preferably, one of the two side surfaces is processed (here referred to as “the one side surface) while the other one of the two side surfaces of the lens (here referred to as “the other side surface) is supported by the lens supporting part.

The lens supporting part comprises a plurality of e support elements that together form a lens seat. The lens seat, for instance, may be a structure that acts as a base or centre for a lens side e during the surfacing s. For example, the support elements may be arranged and provided such that they contribute to parts or ns of a common surface or frame structure, which has a curvature. The expression “curvature” may be understood, for e, as a characteristic of a lens of having a (non-planar and/or) spherical contour in a normal section of the lens along its optical axis. Therein, the curvature may be a measure to determine the amount, by which a surface of the lens deviates from being a plane. For example, in lens manufacturing, curvature may be understood as the reciprocal of a radius of a circle that best fits a r of the lens in a normal section of the lens along its optical axis (e.g. the section showing the lens optical e) and/or as a mean curvature of one of its side surfaces.

The lens supporting part r comprises an adjustment mechanism that is capable of changing the position of at least one or more of the support ts relatively to each other such that the curvature of the lens seat can be adapted to a desired new defined ure. Therein, “defined curvature” may be understood, for example, as specifying the profile and/or contour of the lens seat (e.g. when seen in a normal section of the lens along its optical axis) such that a surface with a defined curvature radius (or mean curvature value) is constituted. Therein, the defined curvature may be different from an initial (starting-)curvature of the other side surface.

The “adjustment mechanism” may be understood, for example, as a device, functional unit and/or functionally linked group of components; which may actively manipulate or allow to manipulate the respective support elements relatively to each other during processing to adjust the curvature of the lens seat to a defined curvature independently from a lens being seated on the support elements.

This capability of the adjustment mechanism is neither restricted by a lens being attached to or supported/seated on the lens seat nor dependent on that a lens is attached to or supported/seated on the lens seat.

Thereby, it is possible to actively adapt the curvature of the lens seat, which supports the lens against mechanical stresses during a surface machining process, even during an ongoing ing process as the curvature of the lens seat can be adjusted even when the lens is seated on the lens seat. Thereby, it is possible to tailor the curvature of the lens seat not only to the l curvature of the front surface of the lens but also to adapt the ure of the lens seat in anticipation of upcoming and ongoing mechanical stresses during the surface processing as well as of a ng ess profile of the lens. An adjustment of the curvature can be achieved within the required accuracy . For example, in lens cturing applications there may be a requirement that new relative positions of support elements can be set with an accuracy of 1 etre or below. Thereby, it is le to provide the lens with excellent support during the entire manufacturing process so that the quality and accuracy of the finished lens can be improved while power errors can be reduced or avoided.

Thus, the known problems and disadvantages of the prior art can be overcome with the lens supporting part of the present invention.

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the adjustment mechanism may be configured to move at least some (or all) of the plurality of support elements independently from each other to obtain the defined curvature. Alternatively or onally, the adjustment mechanism may be configured such that at least one (or preferably all) of the support elements may be relatively movable to a lens being seated on the support elements. The support element(s) may be freely movable between a position, where (one of) the t element(s) is without direct contact with the other side surface of said lens, and a on, where the support element is in direct contact with the other side surface of said lens.

Thereby, the position of each of the support elements with respect to the lens being seated on the lens seat can be set freely. Thus, numerous different configurations of the support elements with respect to each other and the lens can be defined. Accordingly, numerous curvatures of the lens seat can be formed so that the lens can be mechanically supported by the support elements throughout the surface machining s in different configurations. Thus, with such configuration, the lens is less susceptible to ical stresses and deformations during the manufacturing process so that the initial shape of the other side surface can be maintained. Thereby, an improvement of the quality and accuracy of the finished lens can be accomplished.

According to a r preferred embodiment of the invention, the adjustment ism may be configured to move (e.g. slide) the respective support elements in a direction, which may be transverse (e.g. orthogonal) to the lens seat to adjust the curvature of the lens seat.

Alternatively or additionally, the movement may be in a direction that is parallel to a holding force for holding the lens on the lens supporting part to adjust the curvature of the lens seat.

Preferably, the t elements and/or the adjustment ism may be connectable to a component for actuating at least one support element and/or each of the support elements to be moved. Preferably, such actuation may be configured to actively adjust the curvature of the lens seat. More preferred, the adjustment ism may be connectable to at least one actuator, preferably to actuate (e.g. move or displace) the respective support t to be moved.

Thereby, the curvature can be adjusted more accurately and the lens can be supported more effectively as the support ts are movable in directions that correspond with directions of holding forces and machining forces, which have a high impact on affecting the other side e of the lens during the e machining s. Hence, the quality of the finished lens can be improved. ing to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the support elements may each have a distal end. Preferably, all (or at least some) distal ends together may form the lens seat.

The distal ends may each comprise or are made of an elastic material for supporting the lens.

Alternatively or additionally, the support elements may each extend along a longitudinal axis.

Preferably, the support elements may extend between the distal end and a proximal end.

Preferably, the proximal end may be le for being coupled to the adjustment mechanism.

Thereby, the other side surface of the lens can be protected from being scratched or otherwise damaged during the surface machining process. Moreover, the adjustment mechanism can be connected easily with the supporting elements.

According to a further preferred embodiment of the invention, at least one of the support elements may form an outer circumferential sealing edge of the lens seat to allow for a circumferential sealing of a lens being seated on the lens seat. Preferably, the outer circumferential sealing edge may be provided at its distal end. Preferably, the at least one support element, which forms the outer circumferential sealing edge, may be (provided) stationary and/or fixed vely to other support elements and/or relatively to a lens being seated on the support elements.

By providing g on an outer face of the structure formed by the support elements, it is possible to seal a space between the support elements and the other side surface of the lens from the outside. Thus, accidental damage of the other side surface of the lens through coolant or material removed in the process can be averted. By providing the outer circumferential sealing edge ble, it is possible to use the tive support element (forming the outer circumferential sealing edge) as a reference edge for positioning and arranging the lens on the lens supporting part. Thereby, manufacturing of the lens as well as the quality of the finished lens can be improved.

According to a red ment of the invention, the lens ting part may further comprise a vacuum unit. The vacuum unit may also be part of the system described herein below, which then functions the same way. The vacuum unit may be fluidly connected to the lens seat. atively or additionally, the lens seat may be configured to be fluidly connectable to a/the vacuum unit to apply a vacuum in a suction space between the lens seat and a lens being seated on the lens seat. Preferably, the vacuum unit and/or the fluid connection may be provided for creating a g force for holding the lens on the lens seat upon a vacuum being applied. Vacuum passages may be formed between at least some of the support ts for ting the vacuum unit with the suction space (and/or with the lens seat).

Thereby, a space with air pressure below atmospheric pressure can be generated between the lens and the lens supporting part. This allows to secure and/or fix the lens to the lens supporting part by (active) force application so that it is possible to reversibly connect and disconnect the lens from the lens supporting part. In particular, it is no longer necessary to block and to de-block the lens at the beginning or the end of the lens manufacturing process. Thus, the above uration facilitates ted processing of lenses with high throughput rates. By applying the suction force or vacuum through preferably evenly spread passages, deformation of the other side surface of the lens during processing can be avoided. Moreover, it is possible to adapt the strength of the holding force locally so that deformations caused by holding forces can be minimized.

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the adjustment mechanism may comprise at least one actuator, such as an electric motor or pneumatic cylinder. Preferably, the actuator may be suitable and/or ured for displacing the support elements relatively to each other. The actuator may also be part of the system described herein below, which then functions the same way; then the adjustment mechanism may be configured to be connectable to (e.g. the) at least one actuator. Moreover, the adjustment mechanism may comprise a blocking part that is movable between a first position, where the support elements are fixed in their relative position to each other (and preferably to a lens being seated on the lens seat), and a second position, where the support elements are vely movable with respect to each other (and preferably to a lens being seated on the lens seat). For example, the blocking part may be a movable clamp.

Thereby, the support elements can be actively moved between different positions and can be fixed in different positions so that the curvature of the lens seat can be varied and ed with sufficient rigidity in each of the ent arrangements of the support elements.

Preferably, the actuator may be controllable and/or comprise a sensor unit, such as an encoder, for determining positional information, e.g. a ve on of the actuator.

Thereby, it is possible to provide the lens supporting part with a closed loop control as the positional information can be used to check and verify a position of a support element. In case of deviations between a d and actual position, it is possible to adjust (actively) the position of the respective support element.

According to a r preferred embodiment of the ion, the t elements may be formed and/or arranged in a ring shape. ably, the support elements may be rings having a plurality of (differing) ring ers and/or may be coaxially arranged to form the lens seat.

Thereby, the support elements can be provided as simple structures that could correspond with a spherical shape of a lens. Also, the support elements can be arranged concentrically so that the ure of a sphere can be mirrored with high precision. Therein, the lens can be arranged such that its optical axis may correspond with the common centre of the ring arrangement. Hence, accuracy and precision, by which the ure of the lens seat can be adapted with respect to the lens seated on the lens seat, can be ed. Also, the number of parts can be reduced as each ring forms a circumferential section of the lens seat, which reduces structural and control xity.

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the adjustment mechanism may further comprise (for each of the support elements to be moved) a connecting ism to (directly or indirectly) transmit (or transfer) an actuation force of an actuator to the tive support element. Preferably, the actuation force may be transferred such that said support element is linearly moved. The or may be the y mentioned or or a different actuator.

Thereby, it is possible to displace the individual support elements with respect to each other with simple and highly effective technical means. Also, it is le to introduce additional stiffness into the system so that the rigidity of the lens seat is improved, thereby improving the support provided to the lens against mechanical stresses during the manufacturing process. Moreover, the individual support elements can be moved with high accuracy and precision.

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, at least one (or preferably all) of the support elements may be made of a rigid material, such as metal or plastic material, which preferably has a tensile ess between 150 MPa and 250 MPa.

Alternatively or additionally, at least one (or preferably all) of the support elements may comprise or be made of a material with a surface hardness that ranges between a surface hardness found with hard plastic and the one found with hardened steel.

For example, a hard plastic material may have a e hardness ranging from 40 to 100 ShD, preferably 60 to 70 ShD. Therein, the surface hardness of rubber and plastic is quantified with the scale (commonly used unit abbreviations: ShA and ShD), which is defined in industrial norms, such as ASTM D2240. In comparison, hardened steel may have a surface hardness ranging from 50 HRC to 70 HRC, preferably 62 HRC. Therein, the e hardness is quantified with the Rockwell scale (HRC), which is defined in industrial norms, such as ISO 6508.

Preferably, the distal end of (each of) the support elements may comprise or be made of an elastic al for ting the lens. For example, rubber may be used. ably, the c material may be provided as a coating or a separate element that is e to each of the distal ends. Alternatively or additionally, it is also conceivable that a single cover element may be provided for covering each of the distal ends. Preferably, the al used for covering or coating the distal ends of the support elements may have a surface hardness that ranges n a surface hardness found with soft rubber and the one found with soft plastic. Preferably, the surface hardness of soft rubber may be 40 ShA to 100 ShA, preferably 50 ShA to 60 ShA. The surface hardness of soft plastic may be 40 ShD to 100 ShD, preferably 60 ShD to 70ShD.

Thereby, the support elements are provided with high rigidity so that the support elements can act as a rigid wall for the lens during the surface machining process. Also, the resistance to vibrations can be improved.

In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the adjustment mechanism may be configured such that – during processing - at least some of the plurality of support ts are displaceable relatively to each other to adjust the curvature of the lens seat to a (new) defined curvature independently from a lens being seated on the support elements.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the lens supporting part may be configured such that at least some of the support elements and/or the adjustment mechanism is/are ely) controllable by a control unit (e.g. through the adjustment mechanism).

In a further preferred embodiment of the present ion, the adjustment mechanism may be configured to ce – during processing - at least some of the plurality of support elements relatively to each other to a d ure and/or to a curvature that is defined by a control unit, preferably such that the curvature of the lens seat may change during processing.

Preferably, the control unit may be (functionally) connected to the adjustment mechanism preferably so that the adjustment mechanism converts a control signal from the control unit into relative displacement of the support elements. Preferably, the adjustment mechanism may comprise the control unit. Alternatively or additionally, the control unit may be configured to send a control command to an (or each of the) actuator(s) (preferably of the adjustment mechanism) that may convert the command into an sponding) actuation of the actuator.

Preferably, the control unit may comprise anyone of the features of a control unit of a system described below.

Thereby, it is possible to provide a lens supporting part that is ly controlled so that the curvature of the seat for supporting the lens during processing can be adjusted during processing. Thus, unlike in the ons of the prior art, where the seat can be ed only once before the start of the processing, with the above configuration the curvature can be adjusted continuously.

A further aspect of the invention relates to a system for surface processing of at least one of two opposite side surfaces of a lens. The system comprises a lens supporting part for supporting the lens during the surface machining s as described above. The system r comprises a surface processing unit for processing the one side surface of the lens. For example, the surface processing unit may be a lens cutting or lens polishing device. The system also comprises a surface information supply unit for supplying a ry of the other side surface of the lens. The surface ation supply unit may be a camera, a pressure sensor or a laser , for example, for identifying the geometry of the other side surface of the lens.

Alternatively or additionally, the surface information supply unit may be, for example, an interface to a se. The system further comprises a control unit for determining and setting a defined curvature of the lens seat based on the supplied geometry of the other side surface of the lens and for controlling the adjustment mechanism to displace the support elements relative to each other to obtain the defined curvature of the lens seat.

Preferably, the surface information supply unit may be a (digital) database that, for example, may be stored on the control unit. For example, the geometry of the other side surface may be stored in a memory of the control unit as a p table. The lens curvature of the other side surface may be stored in a database as an information. The information stored in the database may be a measured value (e.g. fied by a sensor) or may be a value coming from the manufacturer’s se. The supplied geometry may comprise actual/measured values and/or may comprise corrected values, such as, for example, a (pre-) compensated values with the compensation amount being based on measured values. Preferably, the information (geometry, data) from the information supply unit may be supplied (provided or transferred) to the control unit h a data connection, e.g. a wire or soldering. For example, the operator may scan at the begin of processing a barcode on the lens blank and derive corresponding information from the surface information supply unit on the geometry of the other side surface of the lens blank based on the barcode information.

Preferably, the control unit may be configured to determine a (target) position for each of the support elements before and/or during processing based on the information (i.e. the geometry) supplied by the e information supply unit. For example, an algorithm may be executed on the control unit in order to determine such ons. Therein, for example, while not being excluded, the algorithm may be configured such that positions for the support elements are returned that may be different from ons that lead to replicating the curvature of the other side surface of the lens. Preferably, the control unit may control the adjustment mechanism to adjust the position of the respective support elements (with respect to each other and/or with respect to a lens being seated on the lens seat).

The system comprises all advantages and benefits that were bed in detail above. In particular, by supplying the geometry of the other side surface of the lens, for example by ement or through a database, it is possible to adapt the t of the lens based on the actual (real/measureable) shape of the other side surface of the lens in a state, when the lens is not being subjected to any external forces, such as holding or machining . Moreover, the geometry (e.g. dimensions, contours, parameters and/or functions describing the shape/geometrical characteristics of the other side e) can be used to ate and/or establish how the adjustment ism is to be controlled in order to obtain a desired curvature by displacing the (at least some of the) support elements. Thus, it is possible to take geometrical peculiarities of the lens into consideration so that a d shape of the lens can be obtained with high precision and quality since the structure ting the lens can be adapted in accordance with the actual shape of the lens. Thus, unlike in the prior art, it is not necessary to accept that power errors, which result from imperfections of the other side surface of the lens, inevitably exist. Instead, these initial faults of the lens blanks can be detected and corrected by adapting the processing of the one side surface.

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the control unit may be configured to (continuously) determine and set the d curvature of the lens seat. Preferably, determining and setting the defined curvature may be based on detected process parameters, like mechanical stresses occurring during a processing step, and/or a desired shape for the finished lens.

Thereby, it is possible to actively adapt the curvature of the lens seat ing on a momentary (actual) state of the lens so that consistent support can be provided.

According to a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the system may further comprise a spindle for rotating the lens supporting part during the surface machining process.

Preferably, the lens supporting part and the spindle may be arranged coaxially. Additionally or alternatively, the lens ting part and the spindle may be detachably coupled to each other.

Thereby, it is possible to rotate the lens relatively to the surface processing unit so that the tion of the lens can be achieved with conventional lens manufacturing machinery.

Moreover, the lens supporting part can be d and decoupled from the spindle so that it is possible to use the lens supporting part as well as the system of the invention in an already ng lens manufacturing environment.

As already mentioned herein above, the above-mentioned actuator(s) and/or vacuum unit may be part of the system with the functions and advantages as described before.

A r aspect of the invention relates to a method for surface processing at least one of two te side surfaces of a lens. The method comprises the step of providing the above described system for surface processing at least one of two opposite side surfaces of a lens. A geometry of the other side e of the lens is supplied (e.g. provided with the surface information supply unit). A d curvature of the lens seat is determined and set based on the supplied geometry of the other side surface of the lens (e.g. with the control unit). The curvature of the lens seat is adjusted independently from a lens being seated thereon to obtain the defined curvature of the lens seat (e.g. with the adjustment mechanism and/or during processing). The lens is supported with its other side surface on the lens seat through (by) its defined curvature.

The at least one side surface of the lens is processed to a desired shape (e.g. with the surface processing unit).

Preferably, the lens may be attached to the lens seat by activating a suction force or vacuum as a holding force (e.g. with a or the vacuum unit). More preferred, the lens may be centred on the lens seat. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, during the sing step, the defined curvature of the lens seat may be continuously determined, set and/or adjusted. For example, the d curvature of the lens seat may be continuously determined and set based on detected process parameters. Process parameter may be mechanical stresses occurring during a processing step, positional information ined by sensors of the actuators, and/or a desired shape for the finished lens. Preferably, the defined curvature may be ined and set (e.g. based on one or all of these process parameters) such that a curvature of the other side surface of the lens at the beginning of the processing is maintained. The curvature of the lens seat may be adjusted independently from the lens being seated thereon to obtain the d curvature of the lens seat.

With such configurations of the method, it is possible to achieve all advantages and benefits of the invention that were described in detail above. Also, it is possible to improve the quality and accuracy of the lens generated in the surface machining process.

According to a further preferred embodiment of the ion, the processing step may comprise a lens surface rough g step. In the lens surface rough cutting step, the lens may be secured on both side surfaces between the lens supporting part and an additional g .

The additional holding device may preferably be arranged opposite of the lens supporting part with respect to the lens (seated on the lens seat). Preferably, a finishing step may exist, where the lens is secured only by the lens supporting part.

Thereby, additional support is provided to the lens during a processing step, in which cutting forces are at a high level. Thus, it can be ensured that the lens is well supported on the lens support part and that machining forces are counteracted by the lens t.

Further aspects of the present ion relate to a (ophthalmologic) lens produced with the method of the invention and a use of the system for ing a (ophthalmologic) lens.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the ption and the claims, the words “comprise”, “comprising”, and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to”.

Brief description of drawings Further features, advantages and objects of the ion will become apparent for the skilled person when reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention and when taking in conjunction with the figures of the enclosed drawings.

In case numerals were omitted from a figure, for example for reasons of clarity, the corresponding features may still be present in the figure.

Figure 1 shows schematically a lens in a front view and a side view in the beginning and the end of surface processing.

Figure 2A shows tically a side view of the tion between a lens and a surfacing block of the prior art at the beginning of a surface machining process.

Figure 2B shows tically a side view of the connection between a lens and a surfacing block of the prior art at the end of a surface machining process.

Figure 3 shows schematically an embodiment of a lens supporting part according to the present invention.

Figure 4 shows schematically an embodiment of a system of the present invention with a simplified illustration of a further embodiment of the lens supporting part according to the present invention.

Detailed description Figure 1 shows exemplary profiles of a lens L at the beginning and the end of a surface machining s. s 2A and 2B illustrate known challenges that exist in connecting a lens L with a support block B100 known from the prior art and that were described in more detail above. Figures 3 and 4 show different aspects of different embodiments of the present ion.

For instance, a first aspect of the invention s to a lens supporting part 100 according to the invention. ments of the lens supporting part 100 are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.

The lens supporting part 100 is suitable for supporting lens L in a surface machining process. For example, the lens supporting part 100 may be a jig, a chuck, a workpiece holder, and/or an r suitable to be used in a lens surfacing process.

The lens L comprises two opposite side surfaces L1, L2. This is exemplarily illustrated in all s. In the surface machining process, one side surface L1 of the lens L is to be processed. At the end of the processing, the lens L may have a newly shaped one side surface L11. This is exemplarily illustrated in Figure 1. Preferably, the lens L may comprise a ferential edge L3 that extends between the two side surfaces L1, L2. Preferably, the lens L may be made of a transparent and/or translucent material, e.g. a plastic material, such as polycarbonate, or glass. More red, the lens L may be a lens blank. Preferably, one side surface of the lens blank (e.g. its back surface) may be used for customization in a surface machining process while the other side surface of the lens blank (e.g. its front surface) may be already in its finished state, i.e. may comprise already its intended curvature and may be already polished. The lens L may comprises a coating for polarisation or light blocking. r, this is only an e and the lens L may be a lens blank with both side surfaces requiring surface processing. The lens L may comprise side surfaces L1, L2 that may be convex and/or concave.

The lens L may comprise an optical axis OA that may be a normal of a symmetry plane of the lens L. The lens L may comprise spherically shaped side surfaces L1, L11, L2. It is also conceivable that the lens L has more than one optical axis or ently shaped side es L1- The lens supporting part 100 comprises a plurality of support elements 110. In Figures 3 and 4, the lens supporting part 100 is exemplarily illustrated with six support elements 110.

However, this is only an example and the lens supporting part 100 may comprise any number of support ts 110 greater or equal than two. Preferably, the support elements 110 may each extend along a udinal axis. Moreover, (each or some of) the support elements 110 may preferably extend between a distal end 111 and a proximal end 112. This is exemplarily illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. The support elements 110 may have a ring shape. For e, the support elements 110 may be long hollow shafts. Each of the ring-shaped support elements 110 may have a different diameter and may be arranged coaxially as exemplarily illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. r, this is only an e and the support ts 110 may have various shapes and may be arranged differently. For instance, the support elements 110 may be slats or plates that preferably they may be arranged in a circle such that they all are directed towards a common centre. Preferably, at least one (or all) of the support elements 110 may be made of a rigid al, such as metal (e.g. stainless steel) or a hard plastic. The support elements 110 may have a e stiffness between 150 MPa and 250 MPa. Preferably, material(s) used for the support elements 110 may have a surface hardness in the range between surface harnesses found with hard steel (e.g. 62 HRC) and hard plastic material (e.g. 60-70 ShD).

Moreover, the support elements 110 may each have their distal end 111 made of an elastic material for supporting and/or contacting the lens L. For example, a material with a surface hardness ranging between the surface hardness found for soft rubber (e.g. 60 ShA) and soft plastic material (e.g. 60-70 ShD) may be used for the distal end 111. For example, the support ts 110 may have a rubber coating or gasket provided on their respective distal end 111 to avoid scratching the other side surface L2 when the support elements 110 come into contact with the lens L as exemplarily illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.

The support elements 110 are relatively le with respect to each other. Moreover, the support elements 110 form together a lens seat 120 with a curvature for supporting the lens L on its other side surface L2 against forces caused in the surface machining process. Preferably, each of the distal ends 111 together may form the lens seat 120. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate exemplarily that by increasing the number of t ts 110 it may be possible to increase the resolution for g the ure of the lens seat 120. In Figures 3 and 4, the lens seat 120 is exemplarily shown with a convex shaped surface that is formed by the distal ends 111 of the support elements 110. Each of the support elements 110 may be ed relatively movable to the lens L when the lens L is seated on the t elements 110.

At least one of the t elements 110 may preferably form at its distal end 111 an outer circumferential sealing edge 113 of the lens seat 120. For example, the circumferential sealing edge 113 may be a (rubber) gasket, such as an O-ring. The circumferential sealing edge 113 may allow for a circumferential sealing of the lens L being seated on the lens seat 120 as exemplarily illustrated in Figure 3. Preferably, the support element 110 that forms the outer ferential sealing edge 113 may be fixed relatively to other support elements 110 and preferably also to the lens L when being seated on the support elements 110. This is shown by way of example in s 3 and 4.

Preferably, the support element(s) 110 that form(s) the outer circumferential sealing edge 113 may form a main body of the lens supporting part 100. However, the main body may be formed by a separate ent instead. For example, the main body may be a cartridge or a container. The main body may be arranged to be coupled to a machine or system for surface processing. Preferably, the support elements 110 may be arranged inside the main body around a common axis. Therein, the support elements 110 may be preferably arranged such that for processing they may be brought in alignment with a rotational axis RA of a machine spindle (e.g. later described spindle 540). Figures 3 and 4 indicate this exemplarily. Preferably, the lens L may be ed on the lens seat 120 such that its optical axis is aligned with the rotational axis Preferably, the lens supporting part 100 may further comprise a vacuum unit 200. The vacuum unit 200 may be a vacuum ejector, a displacement or kinetic vacuum pump, for example. In Figure 4, the vacuum unit 200 is exemplarily yed as part of a system 500, which will be described in more detail below. The vacuum unit 200 may be fluidly connected /connectable to the lens seat 120 to apply a vacuum in a suction space 210 between the lens seat 120 and the lens L being seated on the lens seat 120. This is exemplarily rated in Figure 3.

With the vacuum unit 200, a g force for holding r securing) the lens L on the lens seat 120 may be created. Therein, the lens supporting part 100 may comprise at least one vacuum passage 115 for connecting the vacuum unit 200 with the lens seat 120 and the suction space 210. In Figure 3, the vacuum passages 115 are exemplarily shown as being formed between at least some of the support elements 110 for connecting the vacuum unit 200 with the lens seat 120. Therein, the support elements 110 may be arranged with a small gap between each other. In Figure 4, the vacuum passage 115 is exemplarily shown as a single duct that leads to the centre of the lens seat 120 and that may be provided as a through hole in one of the support elements The lens supporting part 100 further comprises an adjustment mechanism 130 for displacing at least some of the plurality of support elements 110 relatively to each other during processing to adjust the curvature of the lens seat 120 to a defined ure independently from a lens L being seated on the support ts 110. The adjustment ism 130 is exemplarily illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. Preferably, the adjustment mechanism 130 may be configured to move at least some of the plurality of support elements 110 independently from each other to obtain the d curvature.

The support elements 110 may be coupled to the adjustment mechanism 130 via their proximal ends 112. Therein, for example, the adjustment mechanism 130 may comprise a connecting mechanism 140. For example, the connecting mechanism 140 may (mechanically and/or electrically) link the support element 110 with the ment mechanism 130. For instance, the connecting mechanism 140 may convert or transfer an actuation (e.g. a l motion or a force) of the adjustment mechanism 130 to the (individual) support elements 110.

The connecting mechanism 140 may define the kinematics n the adjustment mechanism 130 and the support t 110. The connecting mechanism 140 is exemplarily illustrated in Figures 3 and 4 as connecting portion between the t elements 110 and corresponding actuators 300 for displacing, e.g. during processing, at least some of the t elements 110.

Preferably, each of the support elements 110 may be displaced through the connecting mechanism 140 directly/indirectly transmitting an actuation force of the actuators 300 to the corresponding support element 110, e.g. so that the respective support element 110 may be linearly moved. For example, in one of its simplest configurations, the connecting mechanism 140 may be a mechanical connection, such as a screw connection, between the ment mechanism 130 and the respective support element 110.

As mentioned above, the adjustment mechanism 130 or the system 500 may comprise at least one actuator 300. In general, the actuator 300 may be a component that is configured to (actively) generate a (mechanical or ical) force for actuating (i.e. displacing, for example, in a controlled/defined manner) the support elements 110 (to be moved). n, the actuator 300 may be a different component depending, for example, on the design of the adjustment mechanism 130 and/or the connecting mechanism 140. ably, at least one actuator 300 may be provided for each of the support elements 110 that is to be displaced during the surface ing process. The or 300 may be an electric motor, such as illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, or it may be a pneumatic cylinder or a piezo motor. r, it is also vable that the actuator 300 may be a mechanical break or an eddy current break. These are only es and do not represent a complete enumeration. Preferably, the actuator 300 may be controllable, for example by a computational unit or machine control unit (such as later described control unit 530). The actuator 300 may comprise a sensor unit 310 for determining positional information, such as a relative position of the actuator 300 with respect to the lens L or with respect to the outer circumferential sealing edge 113. For example, the actuator 300 may be battery powered and/or may be llable through a wireless receiver for receiving control commands from the machine control unit. The actuator(s) 300 may be arranged relatively movable and/or static (i.e. fixed/immovable) relative to the support elements 110 preferably in operation.

Preferably, the adjustment mechanism 130 may be configured to move the respective support ts 110 in a ion, which is transverse (e.g. orthogonal) to the lens seat 120, in order to adjust the curvature of the lens seat 120. In the examples illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, the adjustment mechanism 130 is configured to move the respective support elements 110 in a direction parallel to the g force for g the lens L on the lens supporting part 100, which is generated by the vacuum unit 200. Preferably, the adjustment mechanism 130 and/or the support elements 110 may be configured to slide.

The adjustment mechanism 130 may be configured to temporarily block (freeze) the nt of the support elements 110. Therein, the ment mechanism 130 may comprise a blocking part that may be movable between a first position, where the support elements 110 are fixed in their relative position to each other (and preferably also to the lens L when being seated on the lens seat 120), and a second position, where the support elements 110 are relatively movable with respect to each other (and ably also to the seated lens L). Preferably, the blocking part may be a movable clamp. atively, it is also conceivable that the actuators 300 block any further movement of the support elements 110 without ing a corresponding l signal.

A further aspect of the present invention relates to a system 500 for surface processing at least one of the two opposite side surfaces L1, L2 of the lens L. The system 500 is exemplarily illustrated in Figure 4. For example, the system 500 may be a machine for surface processing of lenses.

The system 500 comprises the lens supporting part 100 as described above. Unlike in Figure 3, the actuators 300 may be provided as part of the system 500. However, this is only an example.

Furthermore, the system 500 comprises a surface processing unit 510 for sing at least the one side surface L1 of the lens L. For example, the surface processing unit 510 may be a drill, a lens cutting or a lens polishing device. In Figures 3 and 4, the surface sing unit 510 is exemplarily illustrated as a tool bit. However, this is only an example and other tools for roughing, polishing, ing can be used instead.

The system 500 further comprises a surface ation supply unit 520 for supplying a geometry of at least the other side surface L2 of the lens L. The surface information supply unit 520 may be a camera, a pressure sensor or a laser sensor. However, it is also conceivable that the e information supply unit 520 may be a database or an interface, such as a connector or data link, to a database. Preferably, the surface information supply unit 520 may be a contactless sensor such as exemplarily illustrated in Figure 4. The surface ation supply unit 520 may be arranged outside of or (e.g. integrally provided) within the lens supporting part 100.

The system 500 further comprises a (preferably “the” aforementioned) control unit 530 for determining and setting a defined curvature of the lens seat 120 based on the supplied geometry of the other side surface L2 of the lens L and for controlling the adjustment mechanism 130 to displace the support elements 110 relative to each other to obtain the defined curvature of the lens seat 120. For example, the control unit 530 may be a e l device as exemplarily rated in Figure 4. However, it is also conceivable that the control unit 530 may be part of the control unit of one of the actuators 300 (e.g. a servomotor). For example, the control unit 530 may comprise the surface information supply unit 520, e.g. the surface information supply unit 520 may be the memory of the control unit 530 or it may be mounted on the control unit 530.

Preferably, the control unit 530 may be configured to (continuously) determine and set the defined curvature of the lens seat 120. For this, the control unit 530 may comprise signal connections that connect the individual ents of the system 500 with the control unit 530.

This is arily illustrated in Figure 4. For example, the actuator 300 may transmit to the control unit 530 positional information 311 that is determined by the sensor unit 310 of the actuator 300 or by a te sensor provided in the system 500. Further, the control unit 530 may be configured to set and adapt the level and/or application location of the suction force or vacuum created by the vacuum unit 200. Also, the control unit 530 may be configured to (continuously) determine and set the d curvature of the lens seat 120 based on the (so) detected process parameters, but also on mechanical stresses occurring during a processing step and/or a desired shape for the finished lens L. Therefore, the l unit 530 may be connected to the surface information supply unit 520, e.g. via a signal connection.

Preferably, the system 500 may further comprise a spindle 540 for rotating the lens supporting part 100 during the e machining process along the rotational axis RA. This is exemplarily illustrated in Figure 4 but also indicated in Figure 3. The lens supporting part 100 may be part of the spindle 540. Alternatively, the lens supporting part 100 may be arranged coaxially and is detachably coupled thereto as exemplarily illustrated in Figure 4. The control unit 530 may be connected to the spindle 540, e.g. via a signal connection, to control and set the onal speed during surface processing.

A further aspect of the present ion relates to a method for surface sing at least one of the two te side surfaces L1, L2 of the lens L.

The method comprises a step, in which the above described system 500 is provided to facilitate surface processing at least one of the two opposite side surfaces L1, L2. A geometry of at least one of the two side surfaces L1, L2 of the lens L is supplied preferably with the surface information supply unit 520. Based on the so supplied geometry of the respective side surface L1, L2, a d curvature of the lens seat 120 is determined and set, preferably by the control unit 530. The curvature of the lens seat 120 is adjusted (e.g. during processing) independently from the lens L being seated thereon to obtain the d ure of the lens seat 120, preferably by the adjustment mechanism 130. The lens L is supported on the lens seat 120 with its defined curvature at the side e L1, L2 that is not processed.

The lens L may be attached to the lens seat 120 by activating a suction force or vacuum as a holding force, ably with the vacuum unit 200. Preferably, when attaching the lens L on the lens seat 120, the lens L may be centred on the lens seat 120 through the suction force or vacuum pulling the lens L onto the outer circumferential sealing edge 113 into the right position.

For e, the lens seat 120 may be provided with ures of a self-centring mechanism for the lens L.

The at least one side surface of the lens L to be processed is processed to a desired shape, preferably with the surface processing unit 510.

Preferably, during the processing step, the defined curvature of the lens seat 120 may be continuously determined and set based on detected process parameters, like ical stresses occurring during the processing step, the onal information 311 ined by the sensor unit 310, and/or based on a desired shape for the finished lens L. For example, by setting the defined curvature the adjustment mechanism 130 may be (actively) controlled to displace at least some of the support elements 110 relatively to each other.

Preferably, the control unit 530 may be ured such that a curvature of the side surface L2 of the lens L (which is not to be processed) is maintained in its shape at the start of the processing. Alternatively or additionally, during the (still ongoing) sing step, the curvature of the lens seat 120 may be adjusted independently from the lens L being seated thereon to obtain the defined curvature of the lens seat 120. Therein, the processing step may comprise a lens surface rough cutting step, where the lens L is secured on both side surfaces L1, L2 between the lens supporting part 100 and an additional holding device (not illustrated). The additional holding device may be arranged opposite of the lens supporting part 100 with respect to the lens L seated thereon. For completeness and clarification purposes, reference is made to WO