NZ752702B2 - Organoids comprising isolated renal cells and uses thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

Described herein are organoids comprising admixtures of selected bioactive primary renal cells and a bioactive cell population, e.g., an endothelial cell populations, e.g. HUVEC cells, and methods of treating a subject in need thereof with such organoids. Further, the isolated renal cells, which may include tubular and erythropoietin {EPO}- producing kidney cell populations, and/or the endothelial cell populations may be of autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic origin, or any combination thereof. Further provided are methods of treating a subject in need with the organoids. include tubular and erythropoietin {EPO}- producing kidney cell populations, and/or the endothelial cell populations may be of autologous, syngeneic, allogeneic or xenogeneic origin, or any combination thereof. Further provided are methods of treating a subject in need with the organoids.

Description

ORGANOIDS COMPRISING ISOLATED RENAL CELLS AND USES THEREOF This application is a divisional of New Zealand patent application 713875, which is the national phase entry in New Zealand of PCT international ation (published as ) filed 8 May 2014, the contents of which are all incorporated herein by reference.

Field of the Invention The present sure is directed to admixtures of selected bioactive primary renal cells and further bioactive cell populations, and methods of treating a subject in need thereof. The present disclosure is further directed to organoids comprising isolated renal cells, including tubular and erythropoietin (EPO)-producing kidney cell populations, and methods of ng a subject in need with the organoids.

Background of the Invention Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) affects over 19M people in the United States and is frequently a consequence of metabolic disorders involving obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Examination of the data reveals that the rate of increase is due to the development of renal e secondary to ension and non-insulin ent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (United States Renal Data System: Costs of CKD and ESRD. ed. Bethesda, MD, al Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2007 pp 223-238) – two diseases that are also on the rise worldwide. Obesity, hypertension, and poor glycemic control have all been shown to be independent risk factors for kidney damage, causing glomerular and tubular lesions and leading to proteinuria and other systemically-detectable alterations in renal filtration function (Aboushwareb, et al., World J Urol, 26: 295-300, 2008; Amann, K. et al., Nephrol Dial Transplant, 13: 6, 1998). CKD patients in stages 1-3 of progression are managed by lifestyle changes and pharmacological entions aimed at controlling the underlying disease state(s), while patients in stages 4-5 are managed by dialysis and a drug regimen that lly es anti-hypertensive agents, erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), iron and vitamin D mentation. According to the United States Renal Data Service (USRDS), the average end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient expends >$600 per month on injectable erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), Vitamin D supplements, and iron supplements (United States Renal Data System: Costs of CKD and ESRD. ed. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2007 pp 223-238). When paired with the annual average cost of is ($65,405), the healthcare cost for maintenance of a single patient rises to >$72,000/yr (United States Renal Data System: Costs of CKD and ESRD. ed. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2007 pp 8) – a number that reflects only standard ural costs and does not include treatment of other complications, emergency procedures, or ancillary procedures such as the placement of ar grafts for dialysis access. Combined medicare costs for CKD and ESRD in 2005 totaled $62B – representing 19% of all medicare spending for that year d States Renal Data System: Costs of CKD and ESRD. ed. Bethesda, MD, National utes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2007 pp 223-238). Kidney transplantation is an effective option for stage 4-5 patients as a pre-emptive measure to avoid dialysis or when dialysis is no longer sufficient to manage the disease state, but the number of stage 5 CKD patients in the US (>400,000) who could benefit from whole kidney transplant far s the number of suitable donor kidneys ble in any given year (~16,000) (Powe, NR et al., Am J Kidney Dis, 53: S37-45, 2009). Thus, new treatment paradigms are needed to delay or reduce ency on dialysis and to fill the void left by the shortage of donor kidneys.

Progressive renal e s from a combination of the initial disease injury (e.g, hypertension), followed by a maladaptive renal response to that injury. Such a se includes the production of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cytokines and growth factors.

Therefore, one gy to slow CKD progression is to ameliorate the inflammatory and fibrotic response as well as mitigate or reverse renal degeneration through the repair and/or regeneration of renal tissue.

Chronic renal failure is prevalent in humans as well as some domesticated animals.

Patients with renal failure experience not only the loss of kidney function (uremia), but also develop anemia due to the inability of the bone marrow to produce a sufficient number of red blood cells (RBCs) via erythropoiesis. Erythroid homeostasis is dependent on both the production of erythropoietin (EPO) by lized interstitial fibroblasts that reside in the kidney and the ability of targeted erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow to respond to EPO and manufacture more RBCs. The anemia of renal failure is due to both reduced production of EPO in the kidney and the negative s of uremic factors on the actions of EPO in the bone marrow.

To date, clinical approaches to the treatment of chronic renal failure involve dialysis and kidney transplantation for restoration of renal filtration and urine production, and the ic delivery of recombinant EPO or EPO s to restore erythroid mass. Dialysis offers survival benefit to patients in mid-to-late stage renal failure, but causes significant quality-of-life issues. Kidney transplant is a highly desired (and often the only) option for ts in the later stages of renal failure, but the supply of high-quality donor kidneys does not meet the demand for the renal failure population. Bolus dosing with recombinant EPO to treat anemia has now been associated with serious ream health risks, leading to black box warnings from the FDA for the drug, and necessitating further investigation into alternative treatments to restore oid homeostasis in this population. nical investigations have examined in vivo efficacy and safety of EPO-producing cells that have been generated via gene therapy approaches. These studies have shown that it is possible to transiently stimulate erythropoiesis and RBC number by in vivo delivery of epo-producing cells. However, to date, none of these approaches have d regulated erythroid homeostasis or long-term in vivo functionality. Consequently, HCT and RBC number are often increased beyond normal values, leading to themia vera and other complications. ry of EPO-producing cells that are therapeutically-relevant and provide advantages over delivery of recombinant EPO must not only increase HCT, but should restore erythroid homeostasis, with both positive and negative regulatory isms intact. It is important to note that EPO-deficient anemias, while prevalent in ts with kidney e, can also develop as a result of other disease states, including heart failure, organ system failure, and other chronic diseases.

Regenerative medicine technologies provide next-generation therapeutic options for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 and Ilagan et al. describe isolated bioactive renal cells, including tubular and erythropoietin (EPO)-producing kidney cell populations, and methods of isolating and ing the same, as well as methods of treating a subject in need with the cell populations.

There is a need for improved and more targeted regenerative medicine therapeutic options for subjects in need.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In a first aspect the invention provides a method of forming a spheroid comprising: suspension culturing a heterogeneous renal cell population and a bioactive cell population in cell culture media in a 3-dimensional (D) culture system, wherein the 3D culture system comprises a spinner and lacks an exogenous scaffold to which cells of the heterogenerous renal cell population attach; wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population is enriched for renal tubular cells, and wherein the bioactive cell population is a non-renal endothelial cell population, a al endothelial progenitor cell population, a non-renal mesenchymal stem cell tion, or a non-renal adipose-derived progenitor cell tion. [008a] In another aspect the invention provides a spheroid made according the method of the invention. [008b] In a r aspect the invention provides an isolated cluster of cells comprising aheterogeneous renal cell tion and a bioactive cell population, wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population is enriched for renal tubular cells, wherein the bioactive cell population is a nal endothelial cell tion, a non-renal endothelial progenitor cell population, a nal mesenchymal stem cell population, or a non-renal adipose-derived progenitor cell population; and wherein the cluster of cells is cultured in media in suspension without ment to a [008c] In another aspect the invention provides an injectable formulation comprising at least one cluster of cells according to the invention and a liquid medium. [008d] In a further aspect the invention provides an injectable formulation comprising at least one cluster of cells according to the invention and a hydrogel. [008e] In another aspect the invention relates to use of at least one cluster of cells according to the invention and a liquid medium in the cture of a ment to treat kidney e in a subject in need thereof. [008f] In a further aspect the invention relates to the use of at least one cluster of cells according to the invention and a el in the manufacture of a medicament to treat kidney disease in a subject in need thereof. [008g] Certain statements that appear below are broader than what appears in the statements of the invention above. These statements are provided in the sts of providing the reader with a better understanding of the invention and its ce. The reader is directed to the accompanying claim set which defines the scope of the invention.

Described herein are organoids, methods for their preparation and use.

Organoids as described herein provide a therapeutic benefit to a subject in need without the use of a scaffold; and/or at least provide the public with a useful choice.

Described is a method of forming an organoid comprising a heterogeneous renal cell tion and a bioactive cell population. In one emodiment, the d comprises culturing the heterogenerous renal cell population and a bioactive cell population in a e system ed from the group consisting of i) 2D culture; ii) 3D e: COL(I) gel; iii) 3D culture: Matrigel; iv) 3D culture: spinners, followed by COL(I)/Matrigel; and v) 3D culture: COL(IV) gel. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises a bioactive renal cell population. In certain embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises a B2 cell population comprising an enriched population of tubular cells, and wherein the geneous renal cell population is depleted of a B1 cell population and/or a B5 cell population or combination thereof. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises a cell tion selected from B2, B2/B3, B2/B4, and B2/B3/B4. In embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises erythropoetin (EPO)-producing cells.

In another embodiment, the bioactive cell population is an endothelial cell population. In certain embodiments, the endothelial cell population is a cell line. In some embodiments, the endothelial cell population is derived from human umbilical cord. In some embodiments, the bioactive cell population comprise endothelial progenitor cells. In some embodiments, the bioactive cell population comprise mesenchymal stem cells. In some embodiments, the endothelial cell population is adult-sourced. In some embodiments, the cell populations are selected from xenogeneic, syngeneic, allogeneic, autologous and combinations thereof.

In another embodiment, the heterogeneous renal cell tion and the bioactive cell population are cultured separately for a first time period, combined and cultured for a second time period. In certain ments, the renal cell population and bioactive cell population are combined at a ratio of 1:1. In most embodiments, the renal cell population and bioactive cell population are combined, e.g., suspended, in growth medium. In some embodiments, the second time period is between 24 and 72 hours in length, preferably 24 hours.

Also described is is an organoid. In some embodiments, the organoids are made according to the s described herein. In all embodiments, the organoids comprise a heterogeneous renal cell population and a bioactive cell population. In some embodiments, the bioactive cell population is an endothelial cell population. In some embodiments, the endothelial cell population is a cell line. In n embodiments, the elial cell population comprises HUVEC cells.

In some ments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises a B2 cell population comprising an enriched population of tubular cells, and n the geneous renal cell population is depleted of a B1 cell population. In certain ments, the heterogeneous renal cell population is further depleted of a B5 cell population. In select embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises a cell population ed from B2, B2/B3, B2/B4, and B2/B3/B4. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises erythropoetin (EPO)-producing cells.

Described is an injectable formulation comprising at least one id and a liquid medium. In one embodiment, the the liquid medium is selected from a cell growth medium, DPBS and combinations thereof. In another embodiment, the ids are ded in the liquid medium.

In a second embodiment, the injectable formulation comprises organoids and a temperature-sensitive cell-stabilizing biomaterial that maintains (i) a substantially solid state at about 8°C or below, and (ii) a substantially liquid state at about ambient temperature or above. In one other embodiment, the bioactive cells comprise renal cells, as described herein. In another embodiment, the bioactive cells are substantially uniformly dispersed throughout the volume of the cell-stabilizing biomaterial. In other embodiments, the biomaterial has a solid-to-liquid transitional state between about 8°C and about ambient temperature or above. In one embodiment, the substantially solid state is a gel state. In another embodiment, the cell-stabilizing biomaterial comprises a hydrogel. In one other embodiment, the hydrogel comprises gelatin. In other embodiments, the gelatin is present in the formulation at about 0.5% to about 1% (w/v). In one embodiment, the gelatin is present in the formulation at about 0.75% (w/v).

Described is a method of treating kidney e in a t in need comprising administering at least one organoid comprising a heterogeneous renal cell population and a bioactive cell population. In some embodiments, the bioactive cell population is an endothelial cell population. In certain embodiments, the endothelial cell population is a cell line. In one embodiment, the endothelial cell population comprises HUVEC cells.

In most ments, the heterogeneous renal cell population ses a B2 cell population comprising an enriched population of tubular cells, and wherein the heterogeneous renal cell tion is depleted of a B1 cell population. In select embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population is further depleted of a B5 cell population. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population ses a cell population selected from B2, B2/B3, B2/B4, and B4. In most embodiments, the heterogeneous renal cell population comprises opoetin (EPO)-producing cells.

In an embodiment, the method of treating kidney disease in a subject in need comprising administering an injectable formulation as described herein. In all embodiments, the subject is a mammal selected from dogs, cats, , rabbits, zoo animals, cows, pigs, sheep, and primates. In a specific embodiment, the mammal is a human. In all embodiments, the t has a kidney disease. In embodiments, an improvement in any one of the following measures of anemia (Hct, Hgb, RBC), inflammation (WBC), urine concentration (spGrav) and azotemia (BUN) is ed.

Also bed is the use of an organoid in the ation of a medicament for the treatment of kidney disease.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS depicts cell culture morphology of y ZSF1 cells on fibronectin-coated plates. A. p0 unfractionated presort viewed at 5x magnification; B. p1 CD31+ viewed at 5x magnification; C. primary culture of unfractionated kidney cells at the end of passage 0 grown in 21%O2 on fibronectin-treated flask in KGM; D. ve flow through (CD31-) from Miltenyi micro-beads selection;and E. 90% CD31+ cells selected at the end of passage 1 grown on fibronectin coated flasks in EGM2 fully supplemented medium. shows human cell culture morphology viewed at 5x. A. Unfractionated kidney cells at the end of p0 that were grown in 21%O2 on TC-treated flask in KGM; B.

Unfractionated kidney cells at the end of passage 0 grown exposed to 2%O2 O/N on TC- treated flask in KGM; C. Unfractionated kidney cells at the end of passage 0 on fibronectin coated flasks in EGM2 fully mented medium; D. CD31+ positively selected cells at the end of passage 1 grown on fibronectin coated flasks in fully supplemented EGM2 media. depicts FACS analysis showing percentage positive CD31 endothelial cells in ed samples during culture period. The unfractionated (UNFX) endothelial composition was <3% at p0 and was ed ~ 15 fold at p1 when plated on fibronectin and cultured in EGM-2 media. 1 shows Bigeneic xP reporters for e tracing studies.

A. Six2-Cre x R26td Tomato Red cross traces epithelial cells: parietal, proximal and distal epithelial cells, but not interstitial or collecting duct. B. Unlabeled control. C. Six-2 positivity from p1 culture (3 day normoxic followed by 1 day hypoxic culture). shows spinner flasks (A) and low bind plates on rotator (B) used for SRC organoid ion. depicts phase imaging (10x) of A. rat and B. human SRC showing mity in size. C. Organoids expressing pan-cadherin phenotype (green), nuclear (blue) (20x). shows human organoids cultured within a 3D collagen I/IV gel. A. Phase image showing low magnification of organoid tube formation (ringed in white). B. Phase image at higher magnification (ringed in white) along with the remnant organoids. C. GGT-1 phenotypic sion (green), nuclear (blue) D. CK18 expression (green), nuclear ( blue) at 20x magnification. depicts membrane dye labeled organoids. A. SRC only labeled with DiL (red) at x100 maginification. B. Organoid plus, SRC labeled with DiL (red), HuVEC labeled with DiO (green) at x100 maginification. shows 3D tubulogenesis assay in Col I/IV gel of self-generated organoids plus in panels A, B ,and C showing the ce of both SRC population (red) and endothelial cells (green). When , populations appear . Nuclear staining (blue) at 20x magnification. depicts SPIO ine d id (red) prior to injection. shows magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of organoid retention post- implantation green= cells. A. 24hrs. B. 48hrs post-injection. depicts prussian blue staining of implanted organoids showing cell retention and bio-distribution at low and high magnification. A. Implanted left kidney 24hrs post implant. B. Implanted left kidney 48hrs post-implant. is a panel of photographs showing the HLA1 staining of human cells in a rat kidney that had been administered the organoids described herein. A. Normal human ; B. Human kidney cells in rat kidney. C. Untreated Nephrectomized rat kidney. D.

NKO treated (low power micoscopy). E. NKO treated (high power microscopy). F. A second NKO treated animal. Panels A and B demonstrate staining (brown) of normal human kidney tissue as well as human kidney cells (green arrows) acutely delivered to a rodent kidney.

Background staining is present in end of study non-treated ed rat kidneys presumably due to “sticky” nature of proteinaceous casts and damaged tubules as identified in panels C and F by yellow arrows. This staining is typically lighter in color but is sometimes dark and of size r than cells. Panels D, E and F demonstrate lower magnification utilized for ing to identify dark staining cells, then higher magnification confirmation of HLA1 ng cells (green arrows).

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing in color. Copies of this patent or patent publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Many cell types make up the nephron, the functional unit within the kidney parenchyma. The ability to isolate therapeutically bioactive renal cells from both normal and diseased s and humans has been recently ished 1-3. The method used in these studies is dependent on the isolation of a mixture of renal cells that exist in a diseased tissue biopsy, using buoyant density gradient centrifugation.

Described herein is the isolation, identification and expansion of selected individual cell populations of the various n compartments or niches, such that novel, le ed cell types can be combined as selected admixtures. The novel selected admixutres as described herein provide improved targeting of specific structural and functional deficiencies associated with the clinical and pathophysiologic basis of renal disease. The isolation and enrichment of le, individual cell types that make up the nephron and combined as ed admixtures enables improved targeted treatment of specific renal disease s; and/or at least provide the public with a useful choice.

Cell types such as the vascular endothelium, tubular and collecting duct epithelium, interstitial cells, glomerular cells, mesenchymal stem cells, etc., can be isolated, fied and ed ex-vivo. While each cell type may require a unique method and media ation for sub-culture, they can be added back in selective combinations or admixtures as organoid rs to provide enhanced delivery and improved treatment for an underlying renal tissue/ cell ency associated with a specific acute and/or chronic kidney disease patient syndrome/cohort 8.

Described herein are methods of treating renal impairment associated with diseases of the vasculature (e.g., hypertension, microangiopathic anemias) using a defined ratio of renal tubular epithelial to endothelial cells. The ability to isolate, characterize and expand resident renal endothelial cells using selective culture systems and magnetic sorting allows for enrichment of a previously characterized selective regenerative renal epithelial cell (SRC) population 2, 4 with a specific percentage of purified renal endothelial cells (SRC+). The SRC+ cell populations described herein are comprised of selected renal cells (SRCs or BRCs), as previously described and also ed herein, and further bioactive cell populations, including but not limted to, endothelial cells, elial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, and/or adipose-derived progenitors. In one embodiment, the further bioactive cell populations are sourced from renal s. In other embodiments, the further bioactive cell populations are sourced from non-renal sources.

Described herein are organoids comprising and/or formed from heterogenous mixtures or ons of selected or bioactive renal cells (SRCs or BRCs) or SRC+ cell poulations, methods of isolating and culturing the same, as well as s of treatment using the organoids as described herein. Directed delivery of SRC or SRC+ populations to the kidney as organoids is expected to e cell retention, thereby leading to improved overall therapeutic es. The present ption is also directed to methods of treatment using SRC+ cell populations.

Definitions Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Principles of Tissue Engineering, 3rd Ed. (Edited by R Lanza, R Langer, & J Vacanti), 2007 provides one skilled in the art with a general guide to many of the terms used in the present application. One skilled in the art will recognize many methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein, which could be used in the practice of the present invention. Indeed, the present invention is in no way limited to the methods and materials bed.

The term “cell population” as used herein refers to a number of cells obtained by isolation directly from a suitable tissue source, usually from a mammal. The isolated cell tion may be subsequently cultured in vitro. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various methods for isolating and ing cell populations for use with the present invention and various numbers of cells in a cell population that are suitable for use in the present invention. A cell population may be an unfractionated, heterogeneous cell population derived from the kidney. For example, a geneous cell population may be isolated from a kidney biopsy or from whole kidney tissue. Alternatively, the heterogeneous cell population may be derived from in vitro cultures of ian cells, established from kidney biopsies or whole kidney tissue. An unfractionated heterogeneous cell population may also be referred to as a non-enriched cell population.

The term “native ” shall mean the kidney of a living subject. The subject may be healthy or un-healthy. An unhealthy subject may have a kidney disease.

The term “regenerative effect” shall mean an effect which provides a benefit to a native kidney. The effect may include, without limitation, a reduction in the degree of injury to a native kidney or an improvement in, restoration of, or stabilization of a native kidney function. Renal injury may be in the form of fibrosis, inflammation, ular hypertrophy, etc. and related to kidney disease in the subject.

The term “regenerative potential” or “potential regenerative bioactivity” as used herein refers to the potential of the organoids comprising ive cell ations and/or admixtures described herein to e a regenerative effect.

The term ture” as used herein refers to a combination of two or more ed, enriched cell populations derived from an unfractionated, heterogeneous cell population. According to certain embodiments, the cell populations of the present invention are renal cell populations.

An “enriched” cell population or preparation refers to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population (e.g., an unfractionated, heterogeneous cell population) that ns a greater percentage of a specific cell type than the percentage of that cell type in the starting population. For example, a starting kidney cell population can be enriched for a first, a second, a third, a fourth, a fifth, and so on, cell population of interest.

As used herein, the terms “cell population”, “cell preparation” and “cell prototype” are used interchangeably.

The term “enriched” cell population as used herein refers to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population (e.g., a cell suspension from a kidney biopsy or cultured mammalian kidney cells) that contains a percentage of cells capable of producing EPO that is greater than the percentage of cells capable of producing EPO in the starting population. For example, the term “B4” is a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population that contains a greater percentage of EPO-producing cells, glomerular cells, and vascular cells as compared to the starting population. The cell populations of the present invention may be enriched for one or more cell types and depleted of one or more other cell types. For example, an enriched oducing cell tion may be ed for interstitial fibroblasts and depleted of tubular cells and collecting duct epithelial cells ve to the interstitial lasts and tubular cells in a non-enriched cell population, i.e. the starting cell population from which the ed cell population is derived. In all embodiments citing EPO-enriched or “B4” populations, the ed cell populations are heterogeneous populations of cells containing cells that can produce EPO in an regulated manner, as demonstrated by oxygen-tunable EPO expression from the endogenous native EPO gene.

In another embodiment, an enriched cell population, which ns a greater tage of a specific cell type, e.g., vascular, glomerular, or endocrine cells, than the percentage of that cell type in the starting population, may also lack or be deficient in one or more specific cell types, e.g., vascular, glomerular, or ine cells, as compared to a starting kidney cell population derived from a healthy individual or subject. For example, the term “B4’,” or B4 prime,” in one embodiment, is a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population that lacks or is deficient in one or more cell types, e.g., vascular, glomerular or ine, depending on the disease state of the starting specimen, as compared to a healthy individual. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is derived from a subject having chronic kidney disease. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is derived from a subject having focal segmental ulosclerosis (FSGS). In another embodiment, the B4’ cell population is derived from a subject having autoimmune glomerulonephritis. In another embodiment, B4’ is a cell population d from a starting cell population including all cell types, e.g., vascular, glomerular, or ine cells, which is later depleted of or made ent in one or more cell types, e.g., vascular, glomerular, or ine cells. In yet another embodiment, B4’ is a cell population derived from a starting cell population including all cell types, e.g., vascular, glomerular, or endocrine cells, in which one or more ic cell types e.g., vascular, glomerular, or endocrine cells, is later enriched. For example, in one embodiment, a B4’ cell population may be enriched for vascular cells but depleted of glomerular and/or endocrine cells. In another embodiment, a B4’ cell tion may be enriched for glomerular cells but depleted of vascular and/or endocrine cells. In another embodiment, a B4’ cell population may be enriched for endocrine cells but depleted of vascular and/or glomerular cells. In another embodiment, a B4’ cell population may be enriched for ar and endocrine cells but depleted of glomerular cells. In preferred embodiments, the B4’ cell population, alone or admixed with another enriched cell population, e.g., B2 and/or B3, retains therapeutic properties. A B4’ cell population, for example, is bed herein in the Examples, e.g., Examples 7-9.

In another ment, an enriched cell population may also refer to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population as sed above that contains a percentage of cells expressing one or more vascular, glomerular and proximal tubular markers with some EPO-producing cells that is greater than the tage of cells expressing one or more vascular, glomerular and proximal tubular markers with some EPO- producing cells in the starting population. For example, the term “B3” refers to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population that contains a r percentage of proximal tubular cells as well as vascular and glomerular cells as compared to the starting population. In one embodiment, the B3 cell population contains a greater percentage of proximal tubular cells as compared to the starting tion but a lesser percentage of proximal tubular cells as compared to the B2 cell population. In another embodiment, the B3 cell population ns a greater percentage of vascular and glomerular cells markers with some EPO-producing cells as compared to the ng population but a lesser tage of vascular and glomerular cells markers with some EPO-producing cells as compared to the B4 cell population.

In another embodiment, an enriched cell population may also refer to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population as discussed above that contains a percentage of cells expressing one or more tubular cell markers that is r than the percentage of cells expressing one or more tubular cell markers in the starting tion.

For example, the term “B2” refers to a cell population derived from a starting kidney cell population that contains a greater percentage of r cells as compared to the starting population. In addition, a cell population enriched for cells that express one or more tubular cell markers (or “B2”) may contain some epithelial cells from the collecting duct system.

Although the cell population enriched for cells that express one or more tubular cell markers (or “B2”) is relatively ed of EPO-producing cells, glomerular cells, and ar cells, the enriched population may contain a smaller percentage of these cells (EPO-producing, glomerular, and vascular) in comparison to the starting population. In general, a heterogeneous cell population is depleted of one or more cell types such that the depleted cell population contains a lesser proportion of the cell type(s) relative to the proportion of the cell type(s) contained in the heterogeneous cell population prior to depletion. The cell types that may be depleted are any type of kidney cell. For example, in certain embodiments, the cell types that may be ed include cells with large granularity of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < about 1.045 g/ml, referred to as “B1”. In certain other embodiments, the cell types that may be depleted e debris and small cells of low granularity and viabilty having a density of > about 1.095 g/ml, referred to as “B5”. In some embodiments, the cell population enriched for tubular cells is relatively depleted of all of the following: “B1”, “B5”, oxygen-tunable EPO-expressing cells, glomerular cells, and vascular cells.

The term “hypoxic” culture conditions as used herein refers to culture conditions in which cells are subjected to a reduction in available oxygen levels in the culture system relative to standard e conditions in which cells are cultured at atmospheric oxygen levels (about 21%). Non-hypoxic ions are referred to herein as normal or normoxic culture conditions.

The term “oxygen-tunable” as used herein refers to the ability of cells to modulate gene expression (up or down) based on the amount of oxygen available to the cells.

“Hypoxia-inducible” refers to the upregulation of gene expression in response to a reduction in oxygen tension (regardless of the pre-induction or starting oxygen tension).

The term oid” refers to an aggregate or assembly of cells cultured to allow 3D growth as opposed to growth as a monolayer. It is noted that the term “spheroid” does not imply that the aggregate is a geometric sphere. The aggregate may be highly organized with a well defined logy or it may be an unorganized mass; it may e a single cell type or more than one cell type. The cells may be primary isolates, or a permanent cell line, or a combination of the two. Included in this tion are ids and organotypic cultures.

The term oid” as used herein refers to a heterogeneous 3D agglomeration of cells that recapitulates aspects of cellular rganization, architecture and signaling interactions present in the native organ. The term “organoid” es spheroids or cell clusters formed from suspension cell cultures.

The term “biomaterial” as used here refers to a natural or synthetic biocompatible material that is suitable for introduction into living tissue. A natural biomaterial is a material that is made by a living system. Synthetic biomaterials are materials which are not made by a living system. The biomaterials disclosed herein may be a combination of natural and synthetic biocompatible materials. As used herein, biomaterials include, for example, ric matrices and scaffolds. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the biomaterial(s) may be configured in various forms, for example, as liquid hydrogel suspensions, porous foam, and may comprise one or more natural or synthetic biocompatible materials.

The term “construct” refers to one or more cell populations deposited on or in a e of a scaffold or matrix made up of one or more synthetic or naturally-occurring biocompatible materials. The one or more cell populations may be coated with, deposited on, embedded in, ed to, seeded, or entrapped in a biomaterial made up of one or more synthetic or lly-occurring biocompatible polymers, proteins, or peptides. The one or more cell populations may be combined with a biomaterial or scaffold or matrix in vitro or in vivo. In general, the one or more patible materials used to form the scaffold/biomaterial is selected to direct, facilitate, or permit the formation of multicellular, three-dimensional, organization of at least one of the cell populations deposited n.

The one or more biomaterials used to generate the construct may also be selected to direct, facilitate, or permit dispersion and/or integration of the construct or cellular components of the construct with the endogenous host tissue, or to direct, facilitate, or permit the survival, engraftment, tolerance, or functional performance of the construct or cellular components of the construct.

The term “marker” or “biomarker” refers generally to a DNA, RNA, protein, carbohydrate, or glycolipid-based lar marker, the expression or presence of which in a cultured cell population can be detected by standard methods (or methods disclosed ) and is consistent with one or more cells in the cultured cell population being a particular type of cell. The marker may be a ptide sed by the cell or an identifiable physical location on a chromosome, such as a gene, a ction endonuclease recognition site or a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide (e.g., an mRNA) expressed by the native cell. The marker may be an expressed region of a gene referred to as a “gene expression ”, or some segment of DNA with no known coding function. The biomarkers may be cell-derived, e.g., secreted, products.

The terms “differentially sed gene,” “differential gene expression” and their synonyms, which are used interchangeably, refer to a gene whose expression is activated to a higher or lower level in a first cell or cell population, relative to its expression in a second cell or cell population. The terms also include genes whose expression is activated to a higher or lower level at different stages over time during passage of the first or second cell in culture. It is also understood that a differentially expressed gene may be either activated or ted at the nucleic acid level or protein level, or may be t to alternative ng to result in a different polypeptide product. Such differences may be ced by a change in mRNA levels, surface expression, secretion or other partitioning of a polypeptide, for example. Differential gene expression may include a comparison of expression between two or more genes or their gene ts, or a comparison of the ratios of the expression between two or more genes or their gene products, or even a comparison of two differently processed products of the same gene, which differ between the first cell and the second cell. Differential expression includes both quantitative, as well as ative, differences in the temporal or cellular expression pattern in a gene or its sion products among, for example, the first cell and the second cell. For the purpose of this disclosure, “differential gene expression” is considered to be present when there is a difference between the expression of a given gene in the first cell and the second cell. The differential expression of a marker may be in cells from a patient before administration of a cell tion, admixture, or construct (the first cell) relative to expression in cells from the patient after administration (the second cell).

The terms it”, “down-regulate”, “under-express” and “reduce” are used interchangeably and mean that the expression of a gene, or level of RNA molecules or equivalent RNA molecules encoding one or more proteins or protein subunits, or activity of one or more proteins or protein subunits, is reduced relative to one or more ls, such as, for e, one or more positive and/or negative controls. The under-expression may be in cells from a patient before administration of a cell population, ure, or construct relative to cells from the patient after administration.

The term “up-regulate” or “over-express” is used to mean that the sion of a gene, or level of RNA molecules or equivalent RNA molecules encoding one or more proteins or protein subunits, or activity of one or more proteins or protein subunits, is elevated relative to one or more controls, such as, for example, one or more positive and/or negative controls. The over-expression may be in cells from a patient after administration of a cell population, admixture, or construct relative to cells from the patient before administration.

The term “anemia” as used herein refers to a deficit in red blood cell number and/or hemoglobin levels due to inadequate production of functional EPO protein by the EPO- producing cells of a t, and/or inadequate release of EPO protein into systemic circulation, and/or the inability of erythroblasts in the bone marrow to respond to EPO protein. A subject with anemia is unable to maintain erythroid homeostasis. In general, anemia can occur with a decline or loss of kidney function (e.g., chronic renal failure), anemia ated with relative EPO deficiency, anemia associated with congestive heart failure, anemia associated with myelo-suppressive therapy such as chemotherapy or antiviral therapy (e.g., AZT), anemia associated with non-myeloid cancers, anemia associated with viral ions such as HIV, and anemia of c diseases such as autoimmune diseases (e.g., toid arthritis), liver disease, and multi-organ system failure.

The term “EPO-deficiency” refers to any condition or disorder that is treatable with an erythropoietin receptor agonist (e.g., recombinant EPO or EPO analogs), including anemia.

The term “organ-related e” as used herein refers to disorders associated with any stage or degree of acute or chronic organ failure that results in a loss of the organ’s ability to perform its function.

The term “kidney disease” as used herein refers to disorders associated with any stage or degree of acute or chronic renal failure that results in a loss of the kidney’s ability to perform the function of blood filtration and elimination of excess fluid, electrolytes, and wastes from the blood. Kidney disease also includes endocrine dysfunctions such as anemia (erythropoietin-deficiency), and mineral imbalance (Vitamin D deficiency). Kidney disease may originate in the kidney or may be ary to a variety of conditions, including (but not limited to) heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, or liver disease.

Kidney e may be a ion of chronic renal failure that develops after an acute injury to the kidney. For example, injury to the kidney by ia and/or exposure to toxicants may cause acute renal failure; lete recovery after acute kidney injury may lead to the development of chronic renal failure.

The term “treatment” refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative es for kidney e, anemia, EPO deficiency, tubular transport deficiency, or glomerular tion deficiency wherein the object is to reverse, prevent or slow down (lessen) the targeted disorder. Those in need of treatment include those already having a kidney disease, anemia, EPO deficiency, tubular transport ency, or glomerular filtration deficiency as well as those prone to having a kidney disease, anemia, EPO deficiency, tubular transport deficiency, or glomerular filtration ency or those in whom the kidney disease, anemia, EPO deficiency, tubular transport deficiency, or glomerular filtration deficiency is to be prevented. The term ment” as used herein includes the stabilization and/or improvement of kidney function.

The term “subject” shall mean any single human subject, including a patient, eligible for treatment, who is experiencing or has experienced one or more signs, symptoms, or other indicators of a kidney disease, , or EPO deficiency. Such subjects e t limitation subjects who are newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed and are now experiencing a recurrence or relapse, or are at risk for a kidney disease, , or EPO deficiency, no matter the cause. The subject may have been previously treated for a kidney disease, anemia, or EPO deficiency, or not so treated.

The term nt” refers to any single animal, more preferably a mammal (including such non-human animals as, for example, dogs, cats, horses, rabbits, zoo animals, cows, pigs, sheep, and non-human primates) for which treatment is desired. Most preferably, the patient herein is a human.

The term “sample” or “patient sample” or “biological sample” shall generally mean any biological sample obtained from a subject or patient, body fluid, body tissue, cell line, tissue culture, or other source. The term es tissue biopsies such as, for example, kidney biopsies. The term includes cultured cells such as, for example, cultured mammalian kidney cells. Methods for obtaining tissue biopsies and cultured cells from mammals are well known in the art. If the term “sample” is used alone, it shall still mean that the “sample” is a “biological sample” or “patient sample”, i.e., the terms are used interchangeably.

The term “test sample” refers to a sample from a t that has been treated by a method as bed herein. The test sample may originate from various sources in the mammalian subject including, without tion, blood, semen, serum, urine, bone marrow, , tissue, etc.

The term “control” or “control sample” refers a negative or positive control in which a negative or positive result is expected to help correlate a result in the test sample.

Controls that are suitable for the present description include, without limitation, a sample known to exhibit indicators characteristic of normal erythroid homeostasis, a sample known to exhibit indicators characteristic of anemia, a sample obtained from a subject known not to be anemic, and a sample obtained from a subject known to be anemic. Additional controls suitable for use in the methods described herein include, without limitation, samples derived from subjects that have been treated with cological agents known to modulate erythropoiesis (e.g., recombinant EPO or EPO analogs). In addition, the control may be a sample obtained from a subject prior to being treated by a method as described herein. An additional suitable control may be a test sample obtained from a subject known to have any type or stage of kidney disease, and a sample from a subject known not to have any type or stage of kidney e. A control may be a normal healthy matched control.

Those of skill in the art will appreciate other controls suitable for use as described herein.

“Regeneration prognosis”, “regenerative prognosis”, or “prognostic for regeneration” generally refers to a forecast or prediction of the le regenerative course or outcome of the administration or implantation of a cell population, admixture or construct described . For a regeneration prognosis, the forecast or prediction may be informed by one or more of the following: improvement of a functional organ (e.g., the ) after implantation or administration, development of a functional kidney after implantation or administration, development of improved kidney function or ty after implantation or administration, and expression of certain markers by the native kidney ing implantation or administration.

“Regenerated organ” refers to a native organ after implantation or administration of a cell tion, admixture, or construct as described . The regenerated organ is characterized by various indicators including, without limitation, development of function or capacity in the native organ, improvement of function or capacity in the native organ, and the expression of certain markers in the native organ. Those of ordinary skill in the art will iate that other indicators may be le for characterizing a regenerated organ.

“Regenerated kidney” refers to a native kidney after implantation or administration of a cell population, admixture, or construct as described herein. The regenerated kidney is characterized by s indicators including, without limitation, development of function or ty in the native kidney, ement of function or capacity in the native kidney, and the sion of certain markers in the native kidney. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other indicators may be suitable for characterizing a regenerated .

The term “comprising” as used in this specification and claims means “consisting at least in part of”. When reting ents in this specification and claims which include the term “comprising”, other features besides the features prefaced by this term in each statement can also be present. Related terms such as “comprise” and “comprised” are to be interpreted in similar manner.

In this specification where reference has been made to patent specifications, other external documents, or other sources of ation, this is generally for the purpose of ing a context for discussing the features of the invention. Unless specifically stated otherwise, reference to such external documents is not to be construed as an admission that such documents, or such sources of information, in any jurisdiction, are prior art, or form part of the common general knowledge in the art.

SRC+ cell populations Described herein are cell populations comprising isolated, heterogeneous populations of kidney cells, enriched for specific bioactive components or cell types and/or depleted of specific inactive or undesired components or cell types and further bioactive cell tions, including but not limted to, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived progenitors, for use in the treatment of acute or chronic kidney disease. The isolated, heterogeneous populations of kidney cells, enriched for specific bioactive components or cell types and/or depleted of specific inactive or undesired components or cell types may include any of the cell populations as described herein. In one embodiment, the further bioactive components, e.g., endothelial cells, endothelial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, e-derived progenitors, are admixed with the isolated, heterogeneous populations of kidney cells, enriched for specific bioactive components or cell types and/or depleted of specific inactive or red components or cell types. bed herein, are methods for preparing the SRC+ cell populations, as described herein. The further bioactive components, e.g., endothelial cells, endothelial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived progenitors, comprising the cell population, may be present in any percentage ient to improve a cell or tissue deficiency.

The cell populations of the invention may comprise one or more further bioactive components, for example but not limited to, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose-derived progenitors, sing the cell population. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises two further bioactive components. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises three further bioactive components. In certain ments, the cell tion comprises four r bioactive components. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises five further bioactive components. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises six further bioactive components. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises seven further bioactive components. In n embodiments, the cell population comprises eight further bioactive components. In n embodiments, the cell tion comprises nine further bioactive components. In certain embodiments, the cell population comprises ten further bioactive components.

In one embodiment, a further bioactive component is an epithelial cell. In one embodiment, the epithelial cell is a proximal tubular epithelial cell. In another embodiment, the epithelial cell is a distal tubular epithelial cell. In another embodiment, the epithelial cell is a parietal lial cell.

In another embodiment, a further ive component is an epithelial cell. In one embodiment, the epithelial cell is a venous elial cell. In one embodiment, the epithelial cell is an arterial endothelial cell. In one embodiment, the lial cell is a capillary endothelial cell. In one embodiment, the epithelial cell is a tic endothelial cell.

In another ment, a further bioactive component is a collecting duct cell. In yet another embodiment, a further bioactive component is a smooth muscle cell. In another embodiment, a further bioactive component is a mesenchymal stem cell. In another embodiment, a further ive component is a progenitor of endothelial, mesenchymal, epithelial or hematopoietic lineage. In another embodiment, a further bioactive component is a itor of endodermal, ectodermal or mesenchymal embryonic origin. In certain embodiments, a further bioactive component is a stem cell of any origin or derivation, including but not limited to embryonic (ES) and induced pluripotent (iPS) stem cell. In some embodiments, a further bioactive component is a derivative of a stem cell of any origin or derivation, including but not limited to nic (ES) and induced pluripotent (iPS) stem cell, wherein the derivative may be ted by the directed differentiation of the stem cell by defined combinations or cocktails of small molecules and/or protein and/or nucleic acid molecules. In one ment, a further bioactive component is a derivative of a progenitor of endothelial, mesenchymal, epithelial or hematopoietic e wherein the derivative may generated by the directed differentiation of the stem cell by defined combinations or cocktails of small molecules and/or protein and/or nucleic acid molecules.

In one ment, a further bioactive ent is a derivative of a progenitor of endodermal, ectodermal or mesenchymal embryonic origin wherein the derivative may be generated by the directed differentiation of the stem cell by defined combinations or cocktails of small les and/or protein and/or nucleic acid molecules. In one embodiment, a further bioactive component is a genetically ed cell of any lineage or derivation.

In still another embodiment, a further bioactive component is an intersitial cell. In one embodiment, the interstitial cell is a supportive last. In r embodiment, the interstitial cell is a specialized cortical erythropoietin-producing fibroblast.

In one embodiment, the further bioactive component is derived from a source that is autologous to the subject. In one other embodiment, the further bioactive component is derived from a source that is neic to the subject. In certain embodiments, a further bioactive ent is derived from a source that is autologous to the subject, which further bioactive component is a combined admixture with a still further ive components which are derived from a source that is allogeneic to the subject.

Described herein are methods for the targeted ration of renal mass and functionality by directed delivery of the cell populations and/or organoids and/or biomaterials described herein. Also described herein are methods for the rescue and/or ry of renal functionality in patients having acute or chronic renal disease by administration of cell populations and/or organoids and/or biomaterials described herein.

Therapeutic ids Described herein are organoids comprising and/or formed from the bioactive components described herein, e.g., B2, B4, and B3, which are depleted of inactive or undesired components, e.g., B1 and B5, alone or d for use in the treatment of acute and/or chronic kidney disease. Described herein are organiods comprising and/or formed from a specific subfraction, B4, depleted of or deficient in one or more cell types, e.g., vascular, endocrine, or endothelial, i.e., B4’, retains eutic properties, e.g., stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function, alone or when admixed with other bioactive subfractions, e.g., B2 and/or B3. In a red ment, the bioactive cell population is B2. In certain embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with B4 or B4’. In other embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with B3. In other embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with both B3 and B4, or specific cellular ents of B3 and/or B4. In all embodiments, the organoids described herein are formed and cultured ex vivo. In all embodiments, the organoids may further comprise and/or be formed from further bioactive cell populations, including but not limted to, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitors, hymal stem cells, adipose-derived progenitors. In one embodiment, the further bioactive cell populations, including but not limted to, elial cells, endothelial progenitors, mesenchymal stem cells, adiposederived progenitors are admixed with the isolated, heterogeneous populations of kidney cells, enriched for specific bioactive components or cell types and/or depleted of specific inactive or undesired components or cell types.

In one embodiment, the organoids described herein comprise or are formed from a B2 cell population, wherein the B2 cell population comprises an enriched population of tubular cells. In another embodiment, the heterogenous renal cell population further comprises a B4 cell population. In yet another embodiment, the heterogeneous renal cell population r comprises a B3 population. In still another embodiment, the geneous renal cell population further ses a B5 population.

In n embodiments, the cell tion comprises a B2 cell population, wherein the B2 cell population comprises an enriched population of tubular cells, and is depleted of a B1 cell population, and/or a B5 cell population.

Described herein are methods of forming organoids comprising and/or formed from bioactive components described herein, e.g., B2, B4, and B3, which are ed of inactive or undesired components, e.g., B1 and B5, alone or admixed. In one embodiment, described are organiods comprising and/or formed from a specific subfraction, B4, depleted of or deficient in one or more cell types, e.g., vascular, endocrine, or endothelial, i.e., B4’, retains therapeutic properties, e.g., stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function, alone or when admixed with other ive subfractions, e.g., B2 and/or B3. In a preferred embodiment, the ive cell population is B2. In certain embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with B4 or B4’. In other embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with B3. In other embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with both B3 and B4, or ic cellular ents of B3 and/or B4.

In one embodiment, the organoids described herein comprise and/or are formed from a B2 cell population, wherein the B2 cell population comprises an enriched tion of tubular cells. In another embodiment, the heterogenous renal cell tion further ses a B4 cell population. In yet another embodiment, the heterogeneous renal cell population r comprises a B3 population. In still another embodiment, the heterogeneous renal cell population further comprises a B5 population.

In certain embodiments, the cell population ses a B2 cell population, wherein the B2 cell population comprises an enriched population of r cells, and is depleted of a B1 cell population, and/or a B5 cell population.

Described herein are methods of forming organoids using the bio active cell ations and/or admixtures described herein. General metho ds for generating s from primary renal cell populations using 3D COL(I) gel culture are known in the art, for example, as in Joraku et al., Methods. 2009 Feb;47(2):129-33. In all embodiments, the organoids described herein are formed and cultured ex vivo.

In some ments, ion of organoids and tubules from the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein may be induced, for example and without limitation, using the following culture methods or systems: i) 2D culture; ii) 3D culture: COL(I) gel; iii) 3D culture: Matrigel; iv) 3D culture: spinners, then COL(I)/Matrigel; and v) 3D culture: COL(IV) gel. Specific examples of formation of organoids and tubules from NKA are provided in 2 and 4 below.

In one embodiment, organoids formed from the ive cell ations and/or admixtures bed herein may be induced in 2D culture. In one embodiment, the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures bed herein are seeded on standard 2D plastic-ware. In one embodiment, cells are seeded at a density of about 5000 cells/cm2.

Cells may be seeded in an appropriate medium, such as, for example Renal Cell Complete Growth Media (RCGM). In general, cell populations may be grown past ence for about 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 days or more, with regular changes of media about every 3-4 days. In one embodiment, cells demonstrate spontaneous self-organization into spheroidal structures, i.e., organoids, and tubules between about 7 to about 15 days.

In r embodinment, organoids formed from the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein may be induced in 3D culture. In one embodiment, the organoid is generated with the cell populations described herein together with a biomaterial scaffold of natural or synthetic origin. In one embodiment, formulated the bioactive cell ations and/or admixtures described herein may be orated into a collagen (I) gel, collagen (IV) gel, el or a mixture of any of these as previously described (see Guimaraes-Souza et al., 2012. In vitro reconstitution of human kidney structures for renal cell therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 0: 1-9). The liquid gel may be t to a neutral pH and the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein mixed in at about 500-2500 cells/ul. In one embodiment, about 1000 cells/ul are mixed in. The cell/gel mixture may be ted into a well of a 24 well plate, for example, (about 200 to about 400ul/well) and allowed to solidify at 37 degrees C for several hours. Cell culture media may then added and the cultures allowed to mature for about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, or about 10 days with r changes of media. In one embodiment networks of tubular structures organize as lattices and rings form throughout the gel matrix by the ive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein.

In another embodiment, organoids may be formed by suspension culture of the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein in spinner flasks or low-bind plasticware. In one embodiment, cells may be cultured in media in spinner flasks for up to 4 days at about 80rpm. Spheroids may then be further cultured for about 7, about 8, about 9, or about 10 days on Matrigel coated plates, for example. In one embodiment, spheroids formed from the bioactive cell preparations and/or admixtures described herein show tubulogenic potential as shown by de novo g of tubular structures from cultured spheroids.

Cell populations The SRC+ cell populations and/or organoids described herein may contain and/or be formed from isolated, heterogeneous populations of kidney cells, and admixtures f, enriched for specific bioactive components or cell types and/or depleted of ic inactive or undesired components or cell types for use in the treatment of kidney disease, i.e., providing stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function, were previously described in Presnell et al. U.S. 2011-0117162 and Ilagan et al. , the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The organoids may contain isolated renal cell fractions that lack cellular components as compared to a healthy individual yet retain therapeutic properties, i.e., provide stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function. The cell populations, cell fractions, and/or admixtures of cells described herein may be derived from y individuals, individuals with a kidney disease, or subjects as described herein.

Bioactive cell populations Described herein are SRC+ cell populations and therapeutic organoids comprising bioactive cell populations that are to be administered to target organs or tissue in a subject in need. A bioactive cell population generally refers to a cell population potentially having therapeutic properties upon administration to a subject. For e, upon administration to a subject in need, a id comprising a bioactive renal cell tion can provide stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function in the t.

The eutic properties may include a regenerative effect.

Bioactive cell populations include, t limitation, stem cells (e.g., pluripotent, multipotent, oligopotent, or unipotent) such as embryonic stem cells, amniotic stem cells, adult stem cells (e.g., hematopoietic, y, intestinal, mesenchymal, placental, lung, bone marrow, blood, umbilical cord, endothelial, dental pulp, adipose, neural, olfactory, neural crest, testicular), induced pluripotent stem cells; genetically modified cells; as well as cell populations or tissue explants derived from any source of the body. The bioactive cell populations may be isolated, enriched, purified, homogeneous, or heterogeneous in nature.

Those of ry skill in the art will appreciate other bioactive cell populations that are suitable for use in generating the organoids described herein.

In one embodiment, the source of cells is the same as the intended target organ or tissue. For example, renal cells may be sourced from the kidney to generate an organoid to be administered to the kidney. In another embodiment, the source of cells is not the same as the intended target organ or tissue. For e, erythropoietin-expressing cells may be sourced from renal e to generate an organoid to be administered to the kidney.

Described herein areorganoids comprising certain ctions of a heterogeneous population of renal cells, enriched for bioactive components and depleted of inactive or undesired ents provide superior therapeutic and regenerative outcomes than the starting population. For e, bioactive renal cells described herein, e.g., B2, B4, and B3, which are depleted of inactive or undesired components, e.g., B1 and B5, alone or admixed, can be used to generate an id to be used for the stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney on.

In another embodiment, the organoids contain a specific subfraction, B4, depleted of or deficient in one or more cell types, e.g., vascular, endocrine, or endothelial, i.e., B4’, that retain therapeutic properties, e.g., stabilization and/or improvement and/or regeneration of kidney function, alone or when admixed with other bioactive subfractions, e.g., B2 and/or B3. In a preferred embodiment, the bioactive cell population is B2. In certain embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with B4 or B4’. In other embodiments, the B2 cell tion is admixed with B3. In other embodiments, the B2 cell population is admixed with both B3 and B4, or specific cellular components of B3 and/or B4.

The B2 cell population is characterized by expression of a tubular cell marker selected from the group ting of one or more of the following: megalin, cubilin, hyaluronic acid synthase 2 (HAS2), Vitamin D3 25-Hydroxylase (CYP2D25), N-cadherin (Ncad), E-cadherin , Aquaporin-1 (Aqp1), rin-2 (Aqp2), RAB17, member RAS oncogene family (Rab17), GATA binding protein 3 (Gata3), FXYD -containing ion transport regulator 4 (Fxyd4), solute carrier family 9 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger), member 4 4), aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1 (Aldh3b1), de dehydrogenase 1 family, member A3 (Aldh1a3), and Calpain-8 (Capn8), and collecting duct marker Aquaporin-4 (Aqp4). B2 is larger and more granulated than B3 and/or B4 and thus having a buoyant density between about 1.045 g/ml and about 1.063 g/ml (rodent), between about 1.045 g/ml and 1.052 g/ml (human), and between about 1.045 g/ml and about 1.058 g/ml (canine).

The B3 cell population is characterized by the expression of vascular, glomerular and proximal tubular markers with some EPO-producing cells, being of an intermediate size and granularity in comparison to B2 and B4, and thus having a t density between about 1.063 g/ml and about 1.073 g/ml (rodent), n about 1.052 g/ml and about 1.063 g/ml (human), and between about 1.058 g/ml and about 1.063 g/ml e). B3 is characterized by expression of markers selected from the group consisting of one or more of the following: aquaporin 7 (Aqp7), FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 2 (Fxyd2), solute carrier family 17 (sodium phosphate), member 3 (Slc17a3), solute carrier family 3, member 1 (Slc3a1), claudin 2 (Cldn2), napsin A aspartic peptidase ), solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 2 (Slc2a2), alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase (Anpep), transmembrane protein 27 (Tmem27), acyl-CoA synthetase medium-chain family member 2 (Acsm2), glutathione peroxidase 3 (Gpx3), fructose-1,6- biphosphatase 1 (Fbp1), and alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 (Agxt2).

B3 is also characterized by the vascular expression marker Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule ) and the glomerular expression marker podocin (Podn).

The B4 cell population is characterized by the expression of a vascular marker set containing one or more of the following: PECAM, VEGF, KDR, HIF1a, CD31, CD146; a ular marker set containing one or more of the following: n (Podn), and Nephrin (Neph); and an oxygen-tunable EPO enriched population compared to unfractionated (UNFX), B2 and B3. B4 is also characterized by the expression of one or more of the following markers: ine (C-X-C motif) or 4 (Cxcr4), endothelin receptor type B (Ednrb), collagen, type V, alpha 2 (Col5a2), Cadherin 5 (Cdh5), plasminogen activator, tissue (Plat), angiopoietin 2 (Angpt2), kinase insert domain n or (Kdr), secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich (osteonectin) (Sparc), serglycin (Srgn), TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3 (Timp3), Wilms tumor 1 (Wt1), wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 4 , regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (Rgs4), Platelet elial cell on molecule (Pecam), and Erythropoietin (Epo). B4 is also characterized by smaller, less granulated cells compared to either B2 or B3, with a buoyant density between about 1.073 g/ml and about 1.091g/ml (rodent), between about 1.063 g/ml and about 1.091 g/mL (human and canine).

The B4’ cell population is defined as having a t density of between 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL and expressing one or more of the following markers: PECAM, vEGF, KDR, HIF1a, podocin, nephrin, EPO, CK7, CK8/18/19. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by the expression of a vascular marker set containing one or more of the following: PECAM, vEGF, KDR, HIF1a, CD31, CD146. In another embodiment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by the expression of an endocrine marker EPO. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell tion is characterized by the expression of a glomerular marker set containing one or more of the following: Podocin (Podn), and Nephrin (Neph). In certain embodiments, the B4’ cell population is characterized by the sion of a vascular marker set containing one or more of the following: PECAM, vEGF, KDR, HIF1a and by the sion of an endocrine marker EPO. In another embodiment, B4’ is also characterized by smaller, less granulated cells compared to either B2 or B3, with a buoyant density between about 1.073 g/ml and about 1.091g/ml (rodent), between about 1.063 g/ml and about 1.091 g/mL (human and canine).

In one embodiment, described are organoids containing an isolated, enriched B4’ population of human renal cells comprising at least one of erythropoietin (EPO)- producing cells, ar cells, and glomerular cells having a density between 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by expression of a vascular marker. In certain embodiments, the B4’ cell population is not characterized by expression of a glomerular marker. In some embodiments, the B4’ cell population is capable of oxygen-tunable erythropoietin (EPO) expression.

In one embodiment, the organoid as described herein contains the B4’ cell tion but does not e a B2 cell population comprising tubular cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL. In another embodiment, the B4’ cell population-containing id does not include a B1 cell population sing large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml. In yet another embodiment, the B4’ cell tion organoid does not include a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and ity with a density > 1.091 g/ml.

In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population-containing organoid does not include a B2 cell population comprising tubular cells having a density n 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL; a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml; and a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml. In some embodiments, the B4’ cell population may be derived from a subject having kidney disease.

Described herein areorganoids ning admixtures of human renal cells comprising a first cell population, B2, comprising an isolated, enriched population of r cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL, and a second cell population, B4’, comprising erythropoietin (EPO)-producing cells and vascular cells but depleted of glomerular cells having a density between about 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL, wherein the admixture does not include a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the ting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml, or a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml.

In certain ment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by expression of a vascular . In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is not characterized by expression of a glomerular marker. In certain ments, B2 r comprises collecting duct epithelial cells. In one embodiment, the id ns or is formed from an admixture of cells that is capable of receptor-mediated albumin uptake. In another embodiment, the admixture of cells is capable of oxygen-tunable erythropoietin (EPO) expression. In one embodiment, the admixture contains HASexpressing cells capable of producing and/or stimulating the production of high-molecular weight species of hyaluronic acid (HA) both in vitro and in vivo. In all embodiments, the first and second cell populations may be derived from kidney tissue or cultured kidney cells (Basu et al. Lipids in Health and Disease, 2011, :171).

] In one ment, the organoid contains an admixture that is capable of providing a regenerative stimulus upon in vivo delivery. In other embodiments, the admixture is e of reducing the decline of, stabilizing, or improving glomerular filtration, tubular resorption, urine production, and/or endocrine function upon in vivo delivery. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell tion is derived from a subject having kidney e.

Described herein areorganoids containing an isolated, enriched B4’ population of human renal cells comprising at least one of erythropoietin producing cells, vascular cells, and glomerular cells having a density between 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by expression of a vascular marker. In certain embodiments, the B4’ cell population is not characterized by expression of a glomerular marker. The glomerular marker that is not expressed may be podocin (see Example 10). In some embodiments, the B4’ cell population is capable of oxygen-tunable erythropoietin (EPO) expression.

In one embodiment, the B4’ cell tion-containing organoid does not include a B2 cell population comprising tubular cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL. In another embodiment, the B4’ cell population organoid does not include a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml. In yet another embodiment, the B4’ cell population organoid does not include a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml.

In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population-containing organoid does not include a B2 cell population comprising tubular cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL; a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml; and a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml. In some embodiments, the B4’ cell population may be derived from a subject having kidney disease.

Described herein areorganoids containing an admixture of human renal cells sing a first cell tion, B2, comprising an isolated, enriched population of tubular cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL, and a second cell population, B4’, comprising opoietin producing cells and vascular cells but depleted of glomerular cells having a y between about 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL, wherein the admixture does not include a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml, or a B5 cell population sing debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml.

In certain ment, the B4’ cell population is characterized by sion of a vascular marker. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is not terized by sion of a ular marker. In certain embodiments, B2 further comprises collecting duct epithelial cells. In one embodiment, the ure of cells is capable of receptor-mediated albumin uptake. In another ment, the admixture of cells is capable of oxygen-tunable erythropoietin (EPO) expression. In one embodiment, the admixture contains HAS expressing cells capable of producing and/or stimulating the production of high-molecular weight species of hyaluronic acid (HA) both in vitro and in vivo. In all embodiments, the first and second cell populations may be derived from kidney tissue or cultured kidney cells.

Described herein are organiods containing a heterogeneous renal cell population comprising a combination of cell ons or enriched cell populations (e.g., B1, B2, B3, B4 (or B4’), and B5). In one embodiment, the combination has a buoyant density between about 1.045 g/ml and about 1.091 g/ml. In one other embodiment, the ation has a buoyant density between less than about 1.045 g/ml and about 1.099 g/ml or about 1.100 g/ml. In another ment, the combination has a buoyant density as ined by separation on a density gradient, e.g., by centrifugation. In yet another embodiment, the combination of cell fractions contains B2, B3, and B4 (or B4’) depleted of B1 and/or B5. In some embodiments, the combination of cell fractions contains B2, B3, B4 (or B4’), and B5 but is depleted of B1. Once depleted of B1 and/or B5, the combination may be subsequently cultured in vitro prior to the ation of an organoid comprising the combination of B2, B3, and B4 (or B4’) cell fractions.

The inventors of the present invention have surprisingly discovered that in vitro culturing of a B1-depleted combination of B2, B3, B4, and B5 results in depletion of B5.

In one embodiment, B5 is depleted after at least one, two, three, four, or five passages. In one other embodiment, the B2, B3, B4, and B5 cell fraction combination that is passaged under the conditions described herein provides a passaged cell population having B5 at a percentage that is less than about 5%, less than about 4%, less than about 3%, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, or less than about 0.5% of the passaged cell population.

In another embodiment, B4’ is part of the combination of cell fractions. In one other embodiment, the in vitro culturing depletion of B5 is under c conditions.

In one embodiment, the organoid contains an admixture that is e of providing a regenerative stimulus upon in vivo delivery. In other embodiments, the admixture is e of reducing the decline of, izing, or improving glomerular filtration, tubular resorption, urine production, and/or endocrine function upon in vivo delivery. In one embodiment, the B4’ cell population is derived from a subject having kidney disease.

In a preferred embodiment, the organoid contains and/or is formed from an admixture that comprises B2 in combination with B3 and/or B4. In another preferred embodiment, the admixture comprises B2 in combination with B3 and/or B4’. In other red embodiments, the admixture consists of or consists essentially of (i) B2 in combination with B3 and/or B4; or (ii) B2 in combination with B3 and/or B4’.

The admixtures that contain a B4’ cell population may contain B2 and/or B3 cell populations that are also obtained from a non-healthy subject. The non-healthy subject may be the same subject from which the B4’ fraction was obtained. In contrast to the B4’ cell population, the B2 and B3 cell populations obtained from non-healthy subjects are typically not deficient in one or more specific cell types as compared to a starting kidney cell population derived from a healthy individual.

As described in Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328, it has been found that the B2 and B4 cell preparations are capable of expressing higher lar weight species of hyaluronic acid (HA) both in vitro and in vivo, through the s of hyaluronic acid synthase-2 (HAS-2) – a marker that is enriched more specifically in the B2 cell population.

Treatment with B2 in a 5/6 Nx model was shown to reduce fibrosis, concomitant with strong expression HAS-2 expression in vivo and the expected tion of high-molecular-weight HA within the treated . y, the 5/6 Nx model left ted resulted in fibrosis with limited detection of HAS-2 and little tion of high-molecular-weight HA. Without wishing to be bound by , it is hypothesized that this anti-inflammatory high-molecular weight species of HA produced predominantly by B2 (and to some degree by B4) acts synergistically with the cell preparations in the reduction of renal fibrosis and in the aid of renal regeneration. Accordingly, bed herein are organoids containing the bioactive renal cells described herein along with a biomaterial comprising hyaluronic acid. Also described herein is the provision of a biomaterial component of the regenerative stimulus via direct production or ation of production by the implanted cells.

Described herein areorganoids containing and/or generated from isolated, heterogeneous populations of EPO-producing kidney cells for use in the treatment of kidney disease, anemia and/or EPO deficiency in a subject in need. In one embodiment, the cell tions are d from a kidney biopsy. In r embodiment, the cell populations are derived from whole kidney . In one other embodiment, the cell populations are derived from in vitro cultures of mammalian kidney cells, established from kidney biopsies or whole kidney tissue. In all embodiments, these populations are unfractionated cell populations, also referred to herein as non-enriched cell populations.

Described herein are organoids containing and/or generated from isolated populations of erythropoietin (EPO)-producing kidney cells that are further ed such that the proportion of EPO-producing cells in the ed subpopulation is greater ve to the proportion of EPO-producing cells in the starting or l cell population. In one embodiment, the enriched EPO-producing cell fraction contains a greater tion of interstitial fibroblasts and a lesser tion of tubular cells relative to the interstitial fibroblasts and tubular cells contained in the unenriched l tion. In certain embodiments, the enriched EPO-producing cell fraction contains a greater proportion of glomerular cells and vascular cells and a lesser proportion of collecting duct cells relative to the glomerular cells, vascular cells and collecting duct cells contained in the unenriched initial tion. In such embodiments, these populations are referred to herein as the “B4” cell population.

Described herein are organoids containing and/or generated from an EPO- producing kidney cell population that is admixed with one or more additional kidney cell populations. In one embodiment, the EPO-producing cell tion is a first cell population enriched for EPO-producing cells, e.g., B4. In another embodiment, the EPO-producing cell population is a first cell population that is not enriched for EPO-producing cells, e.g., B2. In another embodiment, the first cell population is admixed with a second kidney cell population. In some embodiments, the second cell population is enriched for tubular cells, which may be demonstrated by the presence of a tubular cell phenotype. In another embodiment, the tubular cell phenotype may be indicated by the presence of one tubular cell marker. In another embodiment, the r cell phenotype may be indicated by the presence of one or more tubular cell markers. The tubular cell markers include, without limitation, megalin, cubilin, hyaluronic acid synthase 2 (HAS2), Vitamin D3 25-Hydroxylase (CYP2D25), N-cadherin (Ncad), E-cadherin (Ecad), Aquaporin-1 (Aqp1), Aquaporin-2 (Aqp2), RAB17, member RAS oncogene family (Rab17), GATA binding protein 3 (Gata3), FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 4 (Fxyd4), solute carrier family 9 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger), member 4 (Slc9a4), aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1 b1), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 , member A3 (Aldh1a3), and Calpain-8 (Capn8). In another embodiment, the first cell population is admixed with at least one of several types of kidney cells including, without limitation, interstitium-derived cells, tubular cells, collecting duct-derived cells, glomerulus-derived cells, and/or cells derived from the blood or vasculature.

The organoids described herein may include or be formed from EPO- producing kidney cell populations containing B4 or B4’ in the form of an admixture with B2 and/or B3, or in the form of an enriched cell population, e.g., B2+B3+B4/B4’.

In one embodiment, the organoids n and/or are generated from EPO- producing kidney cell populations that are characterized by EPO expression and bioresponsiveness to oxygen, such that a ion in the oxygen tension of the e system results in an induction in the expression of EPO. In one embodiment, the EPO- producing cell populations are enriched for EPO-producing cells. In one embodiment, the EPO expression is d when the cell population is cultured under conditions where the cells are subjected to a reduction in available oxygen levels in the culture system as ed to a cell population ed at normal atmospheric (~21%) levels of available oxygen. In one embodiment, EPO-producing cells ed in lower oxygen conditions express greater levels of EPO ve to oducing cells cultured at normal oxygen conditions. In l, the culturing of cells at reduced levels of available oxygen (also referred to as hypoxic culture conditions) means that the level of reduced oxygen is reduced relative to the culturing of cells at normal heric levels of available oxygen (also referred to as normal or normoxic culture conditions). In one embodiment, hypoxic cell culture conditions include culturing cells at about less than 1% oxygen, about less than 2% oxygen, about less than 3% oxygen, about less than 4% oxygen, or about less than 5% oxygen. In another embodiment, normal or normoxic culture conditions include culturing cells at about 10% oxygen, about 12% oxygen, about 13% oxygen, about 14% oxygen, about % oxygen, about 16% oxygen, about 17% oxygen, about 18% oxygen, about 19% oxygen, about 20% , or about 21% oxygen.

In one other embodiment, induction or increased expression of EPO is ed and can be observed by culturing cells at about less than 5% ble oxygen and comparing EPO expression levels to cells cultured at atmospheric (about 21%) oxygen. In another embodiment, the ion of EPO is obtained in a culture of cells capable of expressing EPO by a method that includes a first culture phase in which the culture of cells is cultivated at atmospheric oxygen (about 21%) for some period of time and a second culture phase in which the available oxygen levels are reduced and the same cells are cultured at about less than 5% available oxygen. In another embodiment, the EPO expression that is responsive to hypoxic conditions is ted by HIF1α. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other oxygen manipulation culture conditions known in the art may be used for the cells bed herein.

In one embodiment, the organoid contains and/or is formed from enriched populations of EPO-producing mammalian cells characterized by bio-responsiveness (e.g., EPO expression) to perfusion conditions. In one embodiment, the ion conditions include transient, intermittent, or continuous fluid flow (perfusion). In one embodiment, the EPO expression is mechanically-induced when the media in which the cells are cultured is intermittently or continuously circulated or agitated in such a manner that dynamic forces are transferred to the cells via the flow. In one embodiment, the cells subjected to the transient, intermittent, or continuous fluid flow are ed in such a manner that they are present as dimensional structures in or on a material that provides framework and/or space for such three-dimensional structures to form. In one embodiment, the cells are cultured on porous beads and ted to intermittent or continuous fluid flow by means of a rocking platform, orbiting platform, or spinner flask. In another embodiment, the cells are cultured on three-dimensional scaffolding and placed into a device whereby the scaffold is stationary and fluid flows directionally through or across the lding. Those of ry skill in the art will appreciate that other perfusion culture conditions known in the art may be used for the cells described herein.

Inactive cell populations As described herein, the present invention is based, in part, on the surprising finding that organoids comprising and/or formed from n subfractions of a heterogeneous population of renal cells, enriched for bioactive components and ed of inactive or red components, provide superior therapeutic and regenerative outcomes than the starting population. In red embodiments, the organoids described herein contain cellular tions that are depleted of B1 and/or B5 cell populations. For instance, the following may be depleted of B1 and/or B5: admixtures of two or more of B2, B3, and B4 (or B4’); an enriched cell population of B2, B3, and B4 (or B4’).

The B1 cell population comprises large, granular cells of the ting duct and tubular , with the cells of the population having a buoyant density less than about 1.045 g/m. The B5 cell population is comprised of debris and small cells of low granularity and viability and having a buoyant density greater than about 1.091 g/ml.

Methods of isolating and culturing cell populations The SRC+ cell populations and/or organoids described herein contain and/or are formed from cell populations that have been isolated and/or cultured from kidney tissue. s are provided herein for separating and isolating the renal cellular components, e.g., enriched cell populations that are contained in the organoids for therapeutic use, including the treatment of kidney disease, anemia, EPO deficiency, tubular ort deficiency, and glomerular filtration deficiency. In one embodiment, the cell populations are ed from freshly digested, i.e., mechanically or enzymatically digested, kidney tissue or from heterogeneous in vitro cultures of mammalian kidney cells. Methods for isolating the further bioactive cell populations which comprise the SRC+ cell populations described herein are further described in the Examples.

] The organoids may contain and/or are formed from heterogeneous es of renal cells that have been cultured in hypoxic culture conditions prior to separation on a density gradient provides for enhanced distribution and ition of cells in both B4, including B4’, and B2 and/or B3 fractions. The enrichment of oxygen-dependent cells in B4 from B2 was observed for renal cells isolated from both diseased and non-diseased kidneys.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, this may be due to one or more of the following phenomena: 1) selective survival, death, or proliferation of specific cellular components during the hypoxic culture period; 2) alterations in cell granularity and/or size in se to the hypoxic culture, thereby effecting alterations in t density and uent localization during density gradient separation; and 3) alterations in cell gene / protein expression in se to the hypoxic culture period, y resulting in differential characteristics of the cells within any given fraction of the gradient. Thus, in one embodiment, the organoids contain and/or are formed from cell populations enriched for tubular cells, e.g., B2, are hypoxia-resistant.

Exemplary techniques for separating and isolating the cell populations of the invention include separation on a density gradient based on the differential specific y of different cell types ned within the population of interest. The specific gravity of any given cell type can be nced by the degree of granularity within the cells, the intracellular volume of water, and other factors. Described herein are optimal gradient conditions for isolation of the cell preparations of the instant description, e.g., B2 and B4, including B4’, across multiple species including, but not limited to, human, canine, and rodent. In a preferred embodiment, a density gradient is used to obtain a novel enriched population of tubular cells fraction, i.e., B2 cell population, derived from a heterogeneous population of renal cells. In one embodiment, a density gradient is used to obtain a novel enriched population of EPO-producing cells on, i.e., B4 cell population, derived from a heterogeneous population of renal cells. In other embodiments, a density gradient is used to obtain enriched subpopulations of tubular cells, ular cells, and endothelial cells of the kidney. In one embodiment, both the EPO-producing and the tubular cells are separated from the red blood cells and cellular debris. In one embodiment, the EPO- producing, glomerular, and vascular cells are separated from other cell types and from red blood cells and ar debris, while a subpopulation of tubular cells and collecting duct cells are concomitantly separated from other cell types and from red blood cells and cellular debris. In one other ment, the endocrine, glomerular, and/or vascular cells are ted from other cell types and from red blood cells and cellular debris, while a subpopulation of tubular cells and collecting duct cells are concomitantly separated from other cell types and from red blood cells and ar debris.

In one embodiment, the the organoids of the present ption contain and/or are formed from cell populations generated by using, in part, the OPTIPREP® (Axis- Shield) density gradient medium, comprising 60% nonionic ted compound iodixanol in water, based on certain key features described below. One of skill in the art, however, will recognize that any density gradient or other means, e.g., immunological separation using cell e markers known in the art, comprising necessary features for isolating the cell populations of the t invention may be used in accordance with the invention. It should also be recognized by one skilled in the art that the same cellular features that contribute to separation of cellular subpopulations via density gradients (size and granularity) can be exploited to separate cellular subpopulations via flow cytometry (forward scatter = a reflection of size via flow cytometry, and side scatter = a reflection of arity). Importantly, the density gradient medium should have low toxicity towards the ic cells of interest. While the y gradient medium should have low toxicity toward the specific cells of interest, the instant description contemplates the use of nt mediums which play a role in the selection process of the cells of interest. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it appears that the cell populations of the t invention recovered by the gradient comprising iodixanol are iodixanol-resistant, as there is an appreciable loss of cells between the loading and recovery steps, suggesting that exposure to iodixanol under the conditions of the gradient leads to elimination of certain cells. The cells appearing in the specific bands after the iodixanol gradient are resistant to any untoward effects of iodixanol and/or density gradient exposure. Accordingly, the use of additional contrast media which are mild to moderate nephrotoxins in the isolation and/or selection of the cell tions for the ids described herein is also contemplated. In addition, the density gradient medium should also not bind to proteins in human plasma or adversely affect key functions of the cells of st.

Described herein are organoids containing and/or formed from cell populations that have been enriched and/or ed of kidney cell types using fluorescent activated cell sorting . In one embodiment, kidney cell types may be enriched and/or depleted using BD FACSAria™ or equivalent.

In another embodiment, the organoids contain and/or are formed from cell populations that have been enriched and/or depleted of kidney cell types using magnetic cell sorting. In one embodiment, kidney cell types may be enriched and/or depleted using the Miltenyi CS® system or equivalent.

In another embodiment, the organoids may include and/or may be formed from renal cell populations that have been subject to three-dimensional culturing. In one embodiment, the methods of culturing the cell populations are via continuous ion. In one embodiment, the cell populations ed via three-dimensional culturing and continuous ion demonstrate greater cellularity and onnectivity when compared to cell populations cultured statically. In another embodiment, the cell populations cultured via three dimensional culturing and continuous perfusion demonstrate greater expression of EPO, as well as enhanced expression of renal tubule-associate genes such as e-cadherin when compared to static cultures of such cell populations. In yet another embodiment, the cell populations cultured via continuous perfusion demonstrate greater levels of glucose and glutamine consumption when compared to cell tions ed statically.

As described herein, low or hypoxic oxygen conditions may be used in the methods to prepare the cell tions for the organoids described herein. However, the methods of preparing cell populations may be used without the step of low oxygen conditioning. In one embodiment, normoxic conditions may be used.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other methods of isolation and culturing known in the art may be used for the cells described herein.

Biomaterials As described in Bertram et al. U.S. Published Application 20070276507, polymeric matrices or lds may be shaped into any number of desirable configurations to satisfy any number of overall system, geometry or space ctions. In one embodiment, the matrices or scaffolds useful in the t invention may be threedimensional and shaped to conform to the dimensions and shapes of an organ or tissue structure. For example, in the use of the ric scaffold for treating kidney disease, anemia, EPO ency, tubular transport deficiency, or glomerular filtration ency, a three-dimensional (3-D) matrix may be used. A variety of differently shaped 3-D scaffolds may be used. Naturally, the polymeric matrix may be shaped in different sizes and shapes to conform to differently sized patients. The polymeric matrix may also be shaped in other ways to accommodate the special needs of the patient. In another embodiment, the ric matrix or scaffold may be a patible, porous ric scaffold. The scaffolds may be formed from a variety of synthetic or naturally-occurring materials including, but not limited to, open-cell polylactic acid (OPLA®), cellulose ether, cellulose, osic ester, fluorinated polyethylene, phenolic, polymethylpentene, polyacrylonitrile, polyamide, polyamideimide, polyacrylate, polybenzoxazole, polycarbonate, polycyanoarylether, polyester, polyestercarbonate, polyether, polyetheretherketone, polyetherimide, polyetherketone, polyethersulfone, polyethylene, polyfluoroolefin, polyimide, polyolefin, polyoxadiazole, polyphenylene oxide, enylene sulfide, polypropylene, yrene, polysulfide, polysulfone, trafluoroethylene, polythioether, polytriazole, polyurethane, polyvinyl, polyvinylidene fluoride, regenerated cellulose, silicone, urea-formaldehyde, collagens, ns, ectin, glycosaminoglycans, silk, elastin, alginate, hyaluronic acid, agarose, or copolymers or physical blends thereof.

Scaffolding configurations may range from liquid hydrogel suspensions to soft porous scaffolds to rigid, shape-holding porous scaffolds.

The scaffold may be ed of any material form of biomaterial including but not limited to diluents, cell carriers, micro-beads, material fragments, scaffolds of synthetic composition including but not limited to PGA, PLGA, PLLA, OPLA, electrospun bers and foams of synthetic composition including but not limited to PGA, PLGA, PLLA, OPLA, ospun nanofibers.

Hydrogels may be formed from a variety of ric materials and are useful in a variety of biomedical applications. Hydrogels can be described physically as three-dimensional ks of hydrophilic polymers. Depending on the type of hydrogel, they contain varying percentages of water, but altogether do not dissolve in water. Despite their high water content, hydrogels are capable of additionally binding great volumes of liquid due to the ce of hydrophilic residues. Hydrogels swell extensively without changing their nous structure. The basic physical features of hydrogel can be ically modified, according to the properties of the polymers used and the additional special equipments of the products.

Preferably, the hydrogel is made of a polymer, a biologically derived material, a synthetically derived material or combinations thereof, that is biologically inert and physiologically compatible with mammalian tissues. The hydrogel material preferably does not induce an matory response. Examples of other materials which can be used to form a hydrogel e (a) modified alginates, (b) polysaccharides (e.g. gellan gum and carrageenans) which gel by exposure to monovalent cations, (c) polysaccharides (e.g., hyaluronic acid) that are very viscous liquids or are thixotropic and form a gel over time by the slow evolution of structure, and (d) polymeric hydrogel precursors (e.g., polyethylene oxide-polypropylene glycol block copolymers and proteins). U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,893 B1 provides a detailed description of the various polymers, and the chemical properties of such rs, that are suitable for making hydrogels for use in accordance with the t invention.

Scaffolding or biomaterial teristics may enable cells to attach and interact with the scaffolding or biomaterial material, and/or may provide porous spaces into which cells can be entrapped. In one embodiment, the porous scaffolds or biomaterials useful in the present invention allow for the addition or deposition of one or more populations or admixtures of cells on a biomaterial configured as a porous scaffold (e.g., by attachment of the cells) and/or within the pores of the scaffold (e.g., by entrapment of the . In r embodiment, the scaffolds or biomaterials allow or promote for cell:cell and/or cell:biomaterial interactions within the scaffold to form constructs as described herein.

] In one embodiment, the erial used in accordance with the present invention is comprised of onic acid (HA) in hydrogel form, containing HA molecules ranging in size from 5.1 kDA to >2 x 106 kDa. In another ment, the biomaterial used in accordance with the present invention is comprised of hyaluronic acid in porous foam form, also containing HA molecules g in size from 5.1 kDA to >2 x 106 kDa . In yet another embodiment, the biomaterial used in ance with the present invention is comprised of of a poly-lactic acid (PLA)-based foam, having an open-cell structure and pore size of about 50 microns to about 300 microns. In yet another embodiment, the specific cell populations, preferentially B2 but also B4, provide directly and/or stimulate synthesis of high molecular weight Hyaluronic Acid through Hyaluronic Acid Synthase-2 ), especially after intra-renal implantation.

The biomaterials bed herein may also be designed or adapted to respond to n external ions, e.g., in vitro or in vivo. In one embodiment, the biomaterials are temperature-sensitive (e.g., either in vitro or in vivo). In another embodiment, the biomaterials are adapted to respond to exposure to enzymatic degradation (e.g., either in vitro or in vivo). The biomaterials’ response to external conditions can be fine tuned as described herein. Temperature sensitivity of the organoid described can be varied by ing the percentage of a biomaterial in the organoid.

Alternatively, erials may be chemically cross-linked to provide greater resistance to enzymatic degradation. For instance, a carbodiimide crosslinker may be used to chemically crosslink gelatin beads thereby providing a reduced susceptibility to endogenous enzymes.

In one embodiment, the response by the biomaterial to external conditions concerns the loss of structural integrity of the biomaterial. Although aturesensitivity and resistance to enzymatic degradation are ed above, other mechanisms exist by which the loss of material integrity may occur in different biomaterials. These isms may include, but are not limited to thermodynamic (e.g., a phase transition such as g, ion (e.g., diffusion of an ionic crosslinker from a biomaterial into the surrounding tissue)), chemical, enzymatic, pH (e.g., pH-sensitive mes), ultrasound, and photolabile (light penetration). The exact mechanism by which the biomaterial loses structural integrity will vary but typically the mechanism is triggered either at the time of implantation or post-implantation.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other types of synthetic or naturally-occurring materials known in the art may be used to form scaffolds as described herein.

Also described are constructs made from the referenced scaffolds or biomaterials.

Constructs Described herein are organoids that n implantable constructs having one or more of the cell populations described herein for the treatment of kidney disease, anemia, or EPO deficiency in a subject in need. In one embodiment, the construct is made up of a biocompatible material or biomaterial, scaffold or matrix composed of one or more synthetic or naturally-occurring biocompatible materials and one or more cell populations or admixtures of cells described herein deposited on or embedded in a surface of the scaffold by attachment and/or entrapment. In certain embodiments, the uct is made up of a biomaterial and one or more cell populations or admixtures of cells described herein coated with, ted on, deposited in, attached to, entrapped in, embedded in, seeded, or combined with the biomaterial component(s). Any of the cell populations bed , including enriched cell populations or admixtures thereof, may be used in combination with a matrix to form a construct.

In another embodiment, the deposited cell population or cellular component of the construct is a first kidney cell population enriched for oxygen-tunable EPO-producing cells. In another embodiment, the first kidney cell population contains glomerular and vascular cells in addition to the oxygen-tunable EPO-producing cells. In one embodiment, the first kidney cell population is a B4’ cell population. In one other ment, the deposited cell population or cellular component(s) of the construct includes both the first enriched renal cell tion and a second renal cell population. In some embodiments, the second cell population is not enriched for oxygen-tunable EPO producing cells. In another embodiment, the second cell population is enriched for renal tubular cells. In another ment, the second cell population is enriched for renal tubular cells and contains collecting duct epithelial cells. In other embodiments, the renal r cells are characterized by the expression of one or more tubular cell markers that may include, without tion, megalin, cubilin, hyaluronic acid synthase 2 (HAS2), Vitamin D3 25- Hydroxylase (CYP2D25), N-cadherin (Ncad), E-cadherin (Ecad), Aquaporin-1 (Aqp1), Aquaporin-2 (Aqp2), RAB17, member RAS oncogene family ), GATA binding n 3 (Gata3), FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 4 (Fxyd4), solute carrier family 9 (sodium/hydrogen exchanger), member 4 (Slc9a4), aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1 (Aldh3b1), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A3 (Aldh1a3), and Calpain-8 (Capn8).

In one embodiment, the cell populations deposited on or combined with biomaterials or lds to form constructs as bed herein are derived from a variety of sources, such as autologous sources. tologous sources are also suitable for use, including t limitation, allogeneic, or syngeneic (autogeneic or isogeneic) sources.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate there are several suitable methods for depositing or otherwise combining cell populations with erials to form a construct.

In one embodiment, the constructs useful in the present invention are suitable for use in the methods of use described herein. In one embodiment, the constructs are suitable for administration to a subject in need of ent for a kidney disease of any etiology, anemia, or EPO deficiency of any etiology. In other embodiments, the constructs are suitable for administration to a t in need of an improvement in or restoration of erythroid homeostasis. In another embodiment, the constructs are suitable for administration to a subject in need of improved kidney function.

] In yet another embodiment, described is a construct for implantation into a subject in need of improved kidney function comprising: a) a erial comprising one or more biocompatible synthetic polymers or lly-occurring ns or peptides; and b) an admixture of mammalian renal cells derived from a subject having kidney disease comprising a first cell population, B2, comprising an isolated, enriched population of tubular cells having a density between 1.045 g/mL and 1.052 g/mL and a second cell population, B4’, comprising erythropoietin (EPO)-producing cells and ar cells but depleted of glomerular cells having a density between 1.063 g/mL and 1.091 g/mL, coated with, deposited on or in, entrapped in, suspended in, ed in and/or otherwise combined with the erial. In certain embodiments, the admixture does not include a B1 cell population comprising large granular cells of the collecting duct and tubular system having a density of < 1.045 g/ml, or a B5 cell population comprising debris and small cells of low granularity and viability with a density > 1.091 g/ml.

] In one embodiment, the construct includes a B4’ cell population which is characterized by sion of a vascular marker. In some embodiments, the B4’ cell population is not characterized by expression of a ular marker. In certain embodiments, the ure is capable of oxygen-tunable erythropoietin (EPO) expression.

In all embodiments, the admixture may be derived from mammalian kidney tissue or cultured kidney cells.

In one embodiment, the construct includes a biomaterial configured as a three-dimensional (3-D) porous biomaterial suitable for ment and/or attachment of the admixture. In another embodiment, the construct includes a biomaterial configured as a liquid or semi-liquid gel suitable for embedding, attaching, ding, or coating ian cells. In yet another embodiment, the construct includes a biomaterial configured comprised of a predominantly olecular weight species of hyaluronic acid (HA) in el form. In another embodiment, the construct includes a biomaterial comprised of a predominantly high-molecular weight species of hyaluronic acid in porous foam form. In yet another ment, the construct includes a biomaterial comprised of a poly-lactic acid-based foam having pores of between about 50 microns to about 300 microns. In still another embodiment, the construct includes one or more cell tions that may be derived from a kidney sample that is autologous to the t in need of improved kidney function. In certain embodiments, the sample is a kidney biopsy. In some embodiments, the subject has a kidney disease. In yet other embodiments, the cell population is derived from a non-autologous kidney sample. In one embodiment, the construct provides erythroid homeostasis.

Methods of use Described herein are methods for the ent of a kidney disease, anemia, or EPO deficiency in a t in need with SRC+ cell populations and/or organoids containing and/or formed from the kidney cell tions and admixtures of kidney cells described herein. In one embodiment, the method comprises administering to the subject an organoid(s) that includes and/or is formed from a first kidney cell tion enriched for EPO-producing cells. In r embodiment, the first cell population is enriched for EPO- producing cells, glomerular cells, and vascular cells. In another embodiment, the oraganoid(s) may further include and/or may be formed from one or more onal kidney cell populations. In one embodiment, the additional cell population is a second cell population not enriched for EPO-producing cells. In another embodiment, the additional cell population is a second cell population not enriched for oducing cells, glomerular cells, or vascular cells. In another embodiment, the organiod(s) also includes and/or is formed from a kidney cell population or admixture of kidney cells deposited in, deposited on, embedded in, coated with, or entrapped in a biomaterial to form an implantable construct, as described herein, for the treatment of a disease or disorder described herein.

In one embodiment, the organoids are used alone or in combination with other cells or biomaterials, e.g., hydrogels, porous scaffolds, or native or synthetic es or proteins, to ate regeneration in acute or chronic disease states.

The effective treatment of a kidney disease, anemia, or EPO deficiency in a subject by the methods as described herein can be observed h various indicators of erythropoiesis and/or kidney function. In one embodiment, the indicators of erythroid homeostasis include, without limitation, hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HB), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), red blood cell count (RBC), reticulocyte number, reticulocyte %, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW). In one other embodiment, the indicators of kidney function include, without limitation, serum albumin, albumin to globulin ratio (A/G ratio), serum phosphorous, serum sodium, kidney size (measurable by ultrasound), serum calcium, orous:calcium ratio, serum potassium, proteinuria, urine creatinine, serum nine, blood nitrogen urea (BUN), cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels and glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Furthermore, several indicators of general health and well-being include, without limitation, weight gain or loss, survival, blood pressure (mean systemic blood re, diastolic blood pressure, or systolic blood pressure), and physical endurance performance.

In another embodiment, an effective treatment with SRC+ cell populations or bioactive renal cell organoids is evidenced by ization of one or more tors of kidney function. The stabilization of kidney function is demonstrated by the ation of a change in an indicator in a subject treated by a method as described herein as compared to the same indicator in a t that has not been treated by a method as described herein. Alternatively, the ization of kidney function may be demonstrated by the observation of a change in an indicator in a subject treated by a method as described herein as compared to the same indicator in the same subject prior to treatment. The change in the first indicator may be an increase or a decrease in value. In one ment, the treatment provided by the present description may include stabilization of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels in a subject where the BUN levels observed in the subject are lower as ed to a subject with a similar disease state who has not been treated by the methods as bed herein. In one other embodiment, the treatment may include stabilization of serum creatinine levels in a t where the serum creatinine levels observed in the subject are lower as compared to a subject with a similar disease state who has not been treated by the methods as described herein. In another embodiment, the treatment may include stabilization of hematocrit (HCT) levels in a subject where the HCT levels observed in the subject are higher as compared to a subject with a similar e state who has not been treated by the methods as described herein. In another embodiment, the treatment may include stabilization of red blood cell (RBC) levels in a t where the RBC levels observed in the subject are higher as compared to a subject with a similar disease state who has not been treated by the methods as described herein. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that one or more additional tors described herein or known in the art may be measured to determine the effective treatment of a kidney disease in the subject. s and Routes of Administration The SRC+ cell populations and/or bioactive cell as described herein can be administered alone or in combination with other bioactive components. The SRC+ cell populations and/or organoids are suitable for injection or implantation of incorporated tissue engineering elements to the interior of solid organs to regenerate tissue.

] Described herein aremethods of providing a ive cell organoid(s) described herein to a subject in need. In one embodiment, the source of the bioactive cell may be autologous or allogeneic, syngeneic eneic or isogeneic), and any combination thereof. In instances where the source is not autologous, the methods may include the administration of an suppressant agent. Suitable suppressant drugs include, without limitation, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mizoribine, ciclosporin, tacrolimus hydrate, chlorambucil, lobenzarit disodium, auranofin, alprostadil, gusperimus hydrochloride, biosynsorb, muromonab, alefacept, pentostatin, daclizumab, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, leflonomide, basiliximab, dornase α, bindarid, cladribine, pimecrolimus, ilodecakin, cedelizumab, efalizumab, everolimus, anisperimus, gavilimomab, faralimomab, clofarabine, rapamycin, siplizumab, saireito, LDP-03, CD4, SR-43551, SK&F- 106615, IDEC-114, IDEC-131, 0, TSK-204, LF-080299, A-86281, A-802715, GVH-313, HMR-1279, 9, IPL-423323, CBP-1011, 5, CNI-1493, CBP-2011, J-695, LJP-920, L-732531, ABX-RB2, AP-1903, IDPS, BMS-205820, BMS-224818, CTLA4-1g, 90, ER- 38925, ISAtx-247, RDP-58, PNU-156804, LJP-1082, TMC-95A, TV-4710, PTRMG, and 96 (see U.S. Patent No. 7,563,822). Those of ordinary skill in the art will iate other suitable immunosuppressant drugs.

The treatment methods as described herein involve the delivery of SRC+ cell populations and/or organoids described herein. In one ment, direct administration of cells to the site of intended benefit is preferred.

A variety of means for administering organoids to subjects will, in view of this specification, be apparent to those of skill in the art. Such methods include, but are not limited to, intra-parenchymal injection, sub-capsular placement, trans-urethral catheterization, and intra-renal artery catheterization.

Cells can be inserted into a delivery device or vehicle, which facilitates introduction by injection or implantation into the subjects. In certain embodiments, the delivery vehicle can include l materials. In certain other embodiments, the delivery vehicle can include synthetic materials. In one ment, the delivery vehicle provides a structure to mimic or appropriately fit into the organ’s ecture. In other embodiments, the delivery vehicle is fluid-like in nature. Such delivery devices can include tubes, e.g., catheters, for injecting cells and fluids into the body of a recipient t. In a preferred embodiment, the tubes additionally have a , e.g., a syringe, through which the cells of the invention can be introduced into the subject at a desired location. In some embodiments, mammalian kidney-derived cell tions are formulated for administration into a blood vessel via a catheter (where the term "catheter" is intended to include any of the various tube-like systems for delivery of substances to a blood vessel).

Alternatively, the cells can be inserted into or onto a biomaterial or scaffold, including but not limited to textiles, such as weaves, knits, braids, meshes, and non-wovens, perforated films, sponges and foams, and beads, such as solid or porous beads, microparticles, nanoparticles, and the like (e.g., Cultispher-S gelatin beads - Sigma). The cells can be prepared for delivery in a variety of ent forms. For example, the cells can be suspended in a solution or gel. Cells can be mixed with a pharmaceutically able carrier or diluent in which the cells of the ion remain viable. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and diluents include saline, aqueous buffer solutions, solvents and/or sion media. The use of such carriers and ts is well known in the art. The solution is ably sterile and fluid, and will often be isotonic. ably, the solution is stable under the conditions of cture and storage and preserved against the contaminating action of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi through the use of, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, ascorbic acid, thimerosal, and the like. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the delivery vehicle used in the delivery of the cell populations and admixtures thereof of the instant invention can include combinations of the abovementioned characteristics.

Modes of administration of the organoids containing and/or formed from ed renal cell tion(s), for example, the B2 cell population alone or d with B4’ and/or B3, include, but are not limited to, intra-parenchymal injection, sub-capsular placement, or renal artery. Additional modes of administration useful accordance with the present invention include single or multiple injection(s) via direct laparotomy, via direct laparoscopy, transabdominal, or percutaneous. Still yet additional modes of administration useful in accordance with the present invention include, for example, rade and opelvic infusion. Surgical means of administration include one-step procedures such as, but not d to, partial ctomy and construct implantation, partial nephrectomy, partial pyelectomy, vascularization with omentum ± peritoneum, multifocal biopsy needle tracks, cone or pyramidal, to cylinder, and renal pole-like replacement, as well as ep procedures including, for example, organoid-internal bioreactor for replanting. In one embodiment, the organoids containing and/or formed from admixtures of cells are delivered via the same route at the same time. In r embodiment, each of the organoids are delivered separately to ic ons or via specific methodologies, either simultaneously or in a temporally-controlled manner, by one or more of the methods described herein.

The appropriate cell or organoid implantation dosage in humans can be determined from existing information relating to either the activity of the organoids, for example EPO production, or extrapolated from dosing studies conducted in preclinical studies. From in vitro culture and in vivo animal experiments, the amount of organoids can be quantified and used in ating an appropriate dosage of implanted al.

Additionally, the patient can be monitored to determine if additional implantation can be made or implanted material reduced accordingly.

One or more other components can be added to the organoids comprising and/or formed from cell populations and admixtures thereof of the instant invention, including selected extracellular matrix ents, such as one or more types of collagen or hyaluronic acid known in the art, growth factors, and/or cytokines, including but not limited to VEGF, PDGF, TGFβ, FGF, IGF, platelet-rich plasma and drugs.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate the various methods of administration suitable for the ids described herein.

Articles of Manufacture and Kits Described herein are kits comprising the polymeric matrices and scaffolds as described and related materials, and/or cell culture media and instructions for use. The instructions for use may contain, for example, instructions for e of the cells in the formation of the SRC+ cell pouplations or ids as described herein and/or administration of the SRC+ cell pouplations or organoids. In one embodiment, described is a kit comprising a scaffold as described herein and ctions. In yet another embodiment, the kit es an agent for detection of marker sion, reagents for use of the agent, and instructions for use. This kit may be used for the purpose of determining the regenerative prognosis of a native kidney in a subject following the implantation or administration of an organoid(s) described herein. The kit may also be used to determine the biotherapeutic efficacy of an organoid(s) described herein.

Another embodiment is an article of manufacture containing ids containing and/or formed from bioactive cells useful for treatment of subjects in need. The article of manufacture comprises a container and a label or package insert on or associated with the container. Suitable containers include, for e, bottles, vials, syringes, etc. The containers may be formed from a variety of materials such as glass or plastic. The container holds a composition which is effective for treating a condition and may have a sterile access port (for example the container may be a solution bag or a vial having a stopper pierceable by an injection needle). The label or package insert indicates that the organoid is used for treating the particular ion. The label or package insert will further comprise instructions for stering the organoid to the t. Articles of manufacture and kits sing combinatorial ies described herein are also contemplated. Package insert refers to instructions arily included in commercial packages of therapeutic products that contain information about the indications, usage, dosage, administration, contraindications and/or warnings concerning the use of such eutic products. In one embodiment, the package insert indicates that the organoid(s) is used for treating a disease or disorder, such as, for example, a kidney disease or disorder. It may further include other materials desirable from a cial and user standpoint, including other buffers, diluents, filters, needles, and syringes. Kits are also described that are useful for various purposes, e.g., for assessment of rative outcome. Kits can be provided which n detection agents for derived vesicles and/or their contents, e.g., nucleic acids (such as miRNA), vesicles, es, etc., as described herein. ion agents include, without limitation, nucleic acid primers and probes, as well as antibodies for in vitro ion of the desired target. As with the article of manufacture, the kit comprises a container and a label or package insert on or associated with the container. The container holds a composition comprising at least one detection agent. Additional containers may be included that contain, e.g., diluents and buffers or control detection agents. The label or package insert may provide a description of the composition as well as instructions for the ed in vitro, prognostic, or diagnostic use.

The following examples are offered for illustrative es only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.

EXAMPLES Example 1 - Isolation of Selected Renal Cell + (SRC+) cell populations: ion of endothelial cells from renal biopsy The following method provides an example of endothelial cell isolation following enzymatic digestion using a previously adapted Collagenase/Dispase digestion protocol 2, 3, 5. This method has been applied to diseased ZSF1 rat kidneys and to a kidney biopsy obtained from a hypertensive human ESRD patient on dialysis.

Endothelial Cells (EC), vascular and lymphatic origin: ] Digested kidney(s) using standard operating procedures for kidney cell isolation, as bed infra., are filtered through a 100µm Steriflip filter (Millipore). The ing cell suspension is neutralized with DMEM containing 5% FBS and then washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 minutes. The cell pellet recovered through the 100 µm filter is pended in fully supplemented EGM-2 growth medium (Lonza) and plated onto ectin coated dishes at a cell density of 25K/cm2. The cultures are fed every 3 days.

When the EC cultures are 80-90% confluent, they are nized and d. The trypsinized cells are labeled with CD31 ) primary antibody and positively ed using Miltenyi anti-CD31 microbeads. The CD31+ sorted cells are washed, counted, plated and seeded at a density of 10K/cm2 in fully mented EGM-2 medium. Endothelial cell logy should be t post twenty four hours and these cells can be expanded through multiple es. The vascular and/or lymphatic composition may be analyzed using lineage-specific antibodies (e.g. VEGF3 –vascular capillary; LYVE1- lymphatic); the specific elial subpopulation can be further selected/sorted using the same cell surface phenotyping markers, using the Miltenyi micro-bead selection method.

After expansion and purification, the endothelial cell component of the NKA SRC can be enriched to a larger percentage (>30%) than the natural frequency as observed through buoyant density fractionation (<2%). In one embodiment, for controlling the active biological ingredients or composition of NKA, the purified EC can be combined at a selected frequency with the B2 and/or B2-B3-B4 fractions previously described from buoyant density gradient fractionation (e.g. 60% B2-B4 + 40% EC) prior to transplantation.

Endothelial cell sorting using magnetic beads: Cells harvested from the fibronectin coated flasks in EGM2 medium are stained with mouse anti-human CD31 primary antibody at a concentration of million cells/100µl in EGM2 medium w/o supplements for 20 minutes at 4ºC. After 20 minutes the cells are washed and re-suspended in 12mls of EGM2 medium w/o supplements and 200 µl of goat anti-mouse IgG1. Miltenyi microbeads are added at and incubated for an additional minutes at 4ºC protected from light. After 20 minutes the cells are washed twice via centrifugation (5min @ 300xg) and re-suspended in 12mls [10 million cells/ml] and purified using a Miltenyi auto-MACS instrument (Double Positive Selection in Sensitive Mode program).

In the example described in endothelial cells were selected (CD31+ selection) from primary ZSF1 cells. The 3.6 million cells recovered from this process were counted and sub-cultured onto two T175 fibronectin coated flask at a concentration of 10K per cm2. The cells were ed for four days at 21%O2 and harvested at 85% confluency.

Following this selection and culture period, the cells were counted and 9.5 million cells were recovered. The sample collected for phenotypic analysis by FACS was ~ 90% positive for CD31 (, right FACS panel).

Human CKD Endothelial Cell Isolation, terization and ion Human kidney cell culture: ] Human kidney cells (See Table 1 below for donor information) were isolated using standard operating procedures of human kidney primary cell cnzymatic isolation and culture, as described infra. Briefly, cells were isolated and cultured at 25K/cm2 in either T/C treated flask with standard KGM or on fibronectin coated flask with EGM2 fully supplemented medium. The cells were grown for three days in a 21% oxygen environment and then the medium was changed and the es were moved to a 2% oxygen environment for O/N exposure. After four days the cells were imaged to analyze culture morphology (). They were then harvested and counted using standard methods (see HK027 Batch Record). A sample was collected and d to determine the tage of CD31+ endothelial cells (. Endothelial cells were sorted using a mouse anti-human CD31 primary antibody (BD biosciences) and magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi). CD31+ cells were then re-plated onto fibronectin coated flasks at a density of 10K/cm2 and cultured an additional four days ( cell culture morphology). The cells were then counted and a sample was ted to ine the percentage positive endothelial cells using a mouse anti-human CD31 primary and FACS analysis (.

Table 1. Human Kidney Donor Information: Sample ID Cause of Death BUN sCrea HCT HB Key Features HTN for 20yrs, ESRD, on HK027 ICH 72 11.1 42.8 14 dialysis since 07’ In conclusion, the initial culture of diseased ZSF1 cells on fibronectin yielded a 9% CD31+ culture (<2% from TC-treated). At p1, the 9% CD31+ fraction sub-cultured on fibronectin yielded ~ 90% CD31+ cells that expanded nearly 3-fold from p0 to p1. Initial culture of human CKD cells on either T/C treated or fibronectin coated flask yielded approximately the same percentage of CD31 positive cells ( 2.1% compared to 2.7%). As shown, it is possible to sub-culture the positively selected CD31 positive cells on fibronectin coated flasks in fully supplemented EGM2 medium and increase the percentage CD31 positive cells by 13 fold (35.5% from 2.7%) after passage 1.

Isolation of SRC+ cell populations: Examples of the isolation of r ive cell types: A. Renal Epithelia: g activities are evaluating the entation of the various epithelial cell compartments (parietal, proximal tubular, loop of Henle, distal tubular cells) in the fractions isolated through buoyant y gradients. More specifically, the lineage tracing studies e direct and ive confirmation of Six2+ epithelial cell isolation; co-labeling of Six2 with a marker specific to a nephron epithelial compartment (See Tables 2-3) confirms cell-specific detection (See Table 4). Table 4 provides a limited panel of epithelial s that characterizes p0 ZSF1 culture (combined fractions B2-B3-B4) as a mixture of proximal, distal and collecting duct cell types. Using the same cell surface ion antibodies listed in Tables 2-4, the enrichment of these specialized epithelial cell compartments through culture selection as previously described (culture conditions along with magnetic sorting) is contemplated.

Table 2. Marker panel for tissue ic nephron staining Proximal Tubule Distal Tubule Antigen Convoluted Straight Loop Ascending Macula Convoluted Collecting of Thick Densa Duct Henle Limb Cytokeratin CK18 Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos CK 7 Neg Neg Pos Pos Neg Pos Pos-ind Other E-CAD Neg Neg Pos Pos Pos Pos Pos N-CAD Pos Pos Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg Aquaporin Pos Pos Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg Aquaporin Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg Pos THP Neg Neg Neg Pos Pos Pos Pos Lectins LTA Pos Pos Pos Neg Neg Med-ind DBA Neg Neg Pos Pos Pos Pos-ind UEA Neg Neg Neg Neg Neg Pos-ind Pos= positive, Pos-ind = ve cell in selected population of cells, Med –ind = medulary collecting ducts stain pos Table 3. Antibody sourcing Antigen Isotype Manf Cat# Conc. Target CK18 Ms IgG1 abCAM Ab668 1mg/ml Intracellular/Nephro n CK7 Ms IgG1 abCAM Ab9021 1mg/ml Intracellular/DT Aquaporin 1 Ms abCAM Ab9566 ml Membrane/PT IgG2b Aquaporin 2 rb IgG abCAM Ab6415 0.1mg/ml Membrane/CD Tamm ll Rb IgG Santa Sc- 0.2mg/ml Membrane/DT glycoProtein Cruz 20631 LTA (Biotinylated) ---- Vector B-1325 2mg/ml Membrane/PT DBA (Biotinylated) --- Vector B-1035 5mg/ml Membrane/DT/CD UEA (Biotinylated) --- Vector B-1065 2mg/ml Membrane/CD ECAD Ms BD 610182 0.25mg/m Membrane/DT/CD IgG2a l NCAD Ms IgG1 BD 610921 0.25mg/m Membrane/PT Isotype ctrl Ms IgG1 BD 557273 0.5mg/ml Isotype ctrl Ms BD 553454 ml IgG2a Isotype ctrl Ms BD 557351 0.5mg/ml IgG2b Isotype ctrl Gt IgG Invitrog 02-6202 1mg/ml Isotype ctrl Rb IgG Invitrog 02-6102 2mg/ml Secondary antibodies were Alexa 647 molecular probes goat anti mouse IgG , Goat anti Rabbit IgG, and Donkey anti Goat IgG, Strep-Avidin A647. Staining following SOP’s with 1ug/ml/1x106 cells Table 4. Preliminary ZSF1 p0 cell specific detection Marker tment ZSF1 p0 % positive AQP2 Collecting duct 42.36 DBA Distal Tubule 56.93 LTA Proximal/Loop/IMCD 39.62 CK18 Pan-epithelial 68.39 B. Glomerular Derived Cells (parietal lial and podocytes): Anatomical exclusion of the pelvis improves the isolation of the glomerular fraction. Using standard operating procedure for kidney digest, bed infra., cells are isolated and filtered through a 100µm Steri-flip filter (Millipore), and cell particles/clumps larger than 100µm (contains the glomerular fraction) are re-digested for additional 20minutes. The digested fraction is neutralized with DMEM medium ning 10% FBS and washed by fugation (300xg for 5min). The re-suspended cell pellet is cultured in VRADD medium6 F12, 1uM All Trans Retinoic Acid (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA), 0.1um Dexamethasone -Aldrich), 10-100nM Vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3 to promote podocyte culture, or a parietal epithelial friendly serum free medium such as (50:50 DMEM/KSFM) fully supplemented without FBS, cultured on Collagen Type 1 coated T/C plates. Cells are seeded at a density of 25K/cm2 and subculture until cell out-growth appears. Expand and sort outgrowth cells using primary antibody bound to yi ads at passage 1 using either PEC ic markers (such as but not limited to Claudin-1) or progenitor ic s (e.g. CD146, CD117, SOX2, Oct 4A, CD24, CD133) or mesangial specific markers (such as but not limited to Smooth Muscle Actin, Vimentin, Myocardin, Calbindin) or ular capillary endothelial cells (e.g. VEFG3 or CD31 or LIVE1). When harvested at optimal cell yields and combined with the B2 component at a greater than natural frequency, a higher percentage of glomerular-derived cells can be applied to patients afflicted with glomerular disease.

C. Collecting Duct Epithelial: Anatomical exclusion of the cortex and medullary region of the kidney improves the isolation of cells located in or near the pelvis.

Standard ing procedures for isolation and expansion and harvest of primary kidney cells for rodent, canine and human, as described infra., is followed for isolation and expansion of collecting duct epithelial cells. Standard operating procedures for onating sub-populations of primary cultured kidney cells enrich for cells of the collecting ducts in cell fraction B1, are described herein infra. These cells contain the highest percentage of collecting duct epithelial cells based on makers such as Aquaporin 2 and Dolichos Biflorus Agglutinin (DBA). Alternatively, we have adapted a papilla/inter-medullary collecting duct (IMCD) culture protocol from Dr. Ben Humphreys (REGM media supplemented with EGF; unpublished data). In any of these scenarios, a cell fraction enriched for collecting duct lia can be used in combination with B2 component at higher than natural frequencies or they can be expanded using standard KGM or equivalent and used to target diseased etiologies ated with urine tration and may better substantiate the active biological ingredients that could be applied to abnormalities and/or diseases of the renal pelvis (e.g. hydro-nephrosis, vaso-ureter obstruction).

Example 2 - Generation and characterization of ids from SRC and SRC+ populations Self-generated Organoid/Spheroid Formation Organoids were generated following primary kidney culture, expansion and buoyant density gradient centrifugation to isolate SRC (standard operating procedures for generating NKA, as described infra). Briefly, SRC were re-suspended in 100ml of renal cell growth medium at a concentration of [1 x106 cells/ml] in spinner flasks (Corning) for 24- 48hrs on a magnetic stirrer set at 80rpm (. Cell organoids/spheroids consist of clusters of cells g in size from 50-125µM. Cell number per organoid can vary based on cell type and size prior spinner flask culture. Organoid/spheroids have been generated from both rat and human SRC and express a r epithelial phenotype (.

Organoid Function and Tubulogenesis The ability of SRC to form tubes may be applied to assess potency of NKA.

This assay was applied to the SRC ids cultured in a 50:50 mixture of Collagen 1/Collagen IV gelatin in 3D. Upon immuno-fluorescent ng of the cultured organoids, the ant tubes ue to express an epithelial phenotype (.

Organoid Plus The ability of SRC to form self-generated ids may prove advantageous when applying combinations of other cell types. Tubulogenesis may be enhanced with the addition of a vascular or stem cell component. By adding a selective cell population in culture with the SRC tion during the organoid formation period, a functional unit may be formed recapitulating key cell signaling pathways activated during regenerative outcomes. es of such cell-cell interactions include but are not limited to epithelial- mesenchymal signaling events known to be pivotal during organogenesis (see Basu & Ludlow 2012, Developmental engineering the kidney-leveraging genic ples for renal regeneration. Birth Defects ch Part C 96:30-38). While SRC are generated using standard procedures, an endothelial cell line (HuVEC) was used as an example of an organoid(+) combination. Eighty million SRC were labeled with a membrane dye (Invitrogen DiL red label) and added to 20 million HuVEC labeled with a different color membrane dye (Invitrogen DiO green label) in 100ml of RCGM medium in 125ml spinner flasks at 80rpm for 48hrs (. An SRC organoid population alone was also started as control. Upon formation of organoids, tubulogenesis assays were set-up in-vitro within Col I/IV 3D gels to ensure the ability to form tubes with and without potential concomitant vascularization (.

Example 3 - Characterization/biodistribution of SRC ids in rodent models of kidney disease ZSF1 acute study evaluating bio-distribution and cell retention of SPIO labeled organoids over a 48 hr period. Six 40+ week old ZSF1 rats were injected into the parenchyma with 2.5x106 SPIO Rhodamine labeled cells (representing approximately 25000 self-generated organoids in PBS) at a concentration of 50x106/ml in left caudal pole. (Figure 9). Three animals were harvested at intervals of 24 and 48 hrs post implantation. Kidneys were evaluated by MRI and histologically using Prussian blue and H&E ng method for cell retention and bio-distribution (Figure 10 & 11).

RESULTS Organoids were readily labeled and traced following targeted delivery.

Organoid treatment was well tolerated with no morphological alterations observed in the tubular or glomerular compartments. Multifocal rs of epitheliod cells (staining ve by Prussian blue) were frequently observed in the renal cortex of left kidney (intra/inter tubular) at 24 hours post injection and to a lesser extent after 48 hours.

Example 4 - In vivo s to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy of SRC+ and SRC/SRC+ derived ids: CKD (5/6 ctomy) immune-compromised rodent studies Human-derived SRC+ and SRC/SRC+ organoids were evaluated for therapeutic efficiency using the 5/6-nephrectomy model of chronic kidney disease in immune-compromised rodents (NIHRNU (nude) rats; athymic rats). Establishment of the disease state, treatment intervention modalities and clinical evaluation of therapeutic response was as previously described (Genheimer et al., 2012. Molecular characterization of the regenerative response d by intrarenal transplantation of selected renal cells in rodent model of chronic kidney disease. Cells s Organs 196: 374-84).

Cell isolation and selection: Human renal cells were isolated, expanded from biopsy as described in Presnell (2011). Cells were sub-cultured and cryopreserved after passage 2 in cryopreservation buffer (80% HTS/10%DMSO/10% FBS) at a concentration of (20x106 cells/ml/vial) using a freezing rate of -1°C/min down to -80°C and then transferred to the liquid en freezer for longer storage. Following cryopreservation, the cells were quickly thawed at 37°C to assess ry and viability using standard Trypan blue exclusion method. Cells were then seeded onto tissue culture vessels at 3000 cm2 and cultured for 4 days under normoxic ions (21%O2/5% CO2/37°C) in renal cell growth medium.

After 4 days the culture medium was changed and the cultures were incubated overnight in a lower oxygen environment (2%O2/5% CO2/37°C) prior to cell harvest and selection of SRC by density nt separation. Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) es (Lonza 2389, CAT# CC2517) were expanded from early e ing cryopreservation until passage 3 in EGM2 fully supplemented medium. Cells were harvested and viability was assessed using standard Trypan blue ion method.

Organoid ion: Organoid cultures were established by 1) resuspending human SRC and HUVEC’s to a concentration of 2x106 cells/ml in their respective mediums 2) combining equal volumes of each cell preparation 25mls (50x106 ml) into a 125ml spinner flask (Corning). To the combined culture, 25mls of each medium was added to the flasks for a final cell concentration of 1x106 cells/ml in . The flask was placed on a magnetic stirrer in the incubator at a speed of 80RPM and cultured for 24 hrs.

Test Articles: The organoid dose was adjusted such that approximately (2- 5 x106 cells/50µl) were to be administered per rat kidney. Organoid numbers were adjusted to the concentration above in a larger volume of 0.5mL of DPBS to account for any loss during shipping. An extra tube was sent as replacement. The doses were sent via FEDEX to the implantation facility in two 0.5ml microcentrifuge tubes using a CREDO cube shipper at 4-8°C.

Test Article Delivery: The remnant left kidney was accessed through left flank incision. Prior to delivery, organoids were gently resuspended by tapping or flicking the base of the tube (no vortexing). The organoids were aspirated with an 18G blunt tip needle into the syringe. The needle was then changed to a 23G cutting needle for delivery.

Targeted delivery was carried out by injecting 50µL into the cortico-medullary region of the kidney. Untreated control animals remained untreated and underwent no procedure.

RKM Model Procedures: Male NIHRNU rats 8-12 weeks old (approx. 200 g average ) underwent 2 step nephrectomy procedures as follows: For each individual animal the right kidney was removed and weighed, recovery d for 1 week, followed by resection of tissue from caudal and l poles of left kidney which was also weighed.

A 2-3 week recovery and acclimation period followed prior to the beginning of the studies. ing the acclimation period, blood and urine were collected for 2 consecutive weeks and analyzed. Subsequent sampling was med every 2 weeks thereafter. All rodents were fed a commercially available feed, and water was provided ad libitum.

Animals were monitored post-nephrectomy with some evidence of increasing urine n/urine protein creatinine (UPC) and were treated with human organoids at 12 weeks ephrectomy. Table 5 below es an overview of the study.

Table 5: Study Design Nephrectomy DESCRIPTION Batch (Treatment) Assessments Daily Organoid Prototype • Survival Animals (n=4) (59% KMR) Bi-Weekly • Body weights Tx 12 weeks • Serology and post hematology nephrectomy • Urinalysis Panel Untreated Term of (n=8) Necropsy Observation • Gross ogy 204 days post observations Nephrectomy 119 days post- • Abdomen opened Tx and whole animal fixed if unscheduled death Measurements: Body weights (g) were collected on a biweekly . Serum biochemical and hematological evaluations were conducted for the on of study on a bi-weekly basis. Urinalysis was performed biweekly At scheduled necropsy for study animals gross observations were made, the remnant kidney excised and fixed, and animal remains fixed in formalin. All s and tissues were ted as , weighed, measured and prepared for histological processing. Methods used in histological evaluations of kidney were performed. KMR is kidney mass ion.

RESULTS: The efficacy of human NKO was demonstrated in a renal insufficiency model in athymic rats.

RKM Model Overview Disease progression within the athymic KMR model was consistent with previously described nephrectomy models and CKD-related sequelae including disruption of kidney protein handling, azotemia, hypercholesterolemia, anemia, and ping uremia.

The outcome of NIHRNU Nephrectomy model in regard to disease state achieved was sensitive to the amount of kidney tissue resected during mass reduction and the animals utilized here demonstrated a slowly progressing early stage disease state based upon clinical pathology monitoring and terminal histological evaluations.

NKO Prototype Effect on In-Life Clinical Pathology Clinical ogy measures relevant to kidney function were examined pretreatment and compared in a paired n to measures taken prior to end of study. From this comparison, as summarized in the table below, there were changes consistent with disease progression over the 4 month study in untreated control animals. Significant differences were noted in paired BUN, Hct, Hgb, RBC, WBC, sChol, sProt, sAlb, uPro, UPC, and . s in these markers are typical of early stage CKD and indicative of decreases in renal function that have yet to result in acute azotemia, end stage loss of tubule filtration/concentration and otemia. In animals treated with NKO, changes in BUN, Hct, Hgb, RBC, WBC, and spGrav were not significant as would be predicted based upon untreated control animal outcomes (see Table 6 below).

Table 6. Treatment Group Clinical Measures Pre- and Post-Treatment.

Paired t- Time 0 End of Study Significant test Measure Group Average SD Average SD Change p-value sCre Control 0.48 0.07 0.51 0.21 0.598 Organoid 0.43 0.05 0.58 0.29 0.298 BUN Control 32.4 4.2 47.1 19.5 YES 0.045 Organoid 31.8 5.7 56.5 27.8 0.09 Hct Control 46.56 2.48 39.99 2.71 Yes <0.0001 Organoid 42.48 1.38 39.1 3.71 0.26 Hgb Control 14.85 0.92 12.93 0.83 Yes 0.0005 Organoid 14.18 0.25 12.63 1.05 0.0518 RBC Control 8.93 0.49 7.88 0.59 Yes 0.0007 Organoid 8.51 0.17 7.76 0.68 0.124 WBC Control 6.13 0.6 8.74 2.15 Yes 0.016 Organoid 6.93 0.43 7.4 0.76 0.406 sPhos Control 7.28 0.88 6.38 1.1 0.15 Organoid 6.75 0.51 7.7 1.87 0.48 sChol l 89.1 9.6 139 47.4 Yes 0.01 Organoid 77.8 4.1 142.5 15.4 Yes 0.005 sProt Control 5.99 0.24 5.28 0.28 Yes 0.001 id 5.83 0.26 5.38 0.1 Yes 0.04 sAlb Control 3.15 0.11 2.64 0.23 Yes 0.0003 Organoid 2.95 0.06 2.58 0.05 Yes 0.0004 uPro Control 371.8 211.5 625.6 182.7 Yes 0.007 Organoid 252 127.7 674.9 33.63 Yes 0.008 UPC Control 4.47 2.08 11.25 3.65 Yes <0.0001 id 4.39 0.95 11.41 0.66 Yes 0.01 uCre Control 83.4 22.9 56.3 13.8 0.06 Organoid 55.75 17.86 58.3 3.5 0.87 uNa Control 134.38 52.63 61.13 12.88 Yes 0.005 id 110.25 34.79 50.67 6.74 0.116 uK Control 116 35.66 84.75 5.24 0.104 Organoid 79.5 22.75 87.67 8.56 0.549 uChlor Control 163.88 20.7 86.75 16.09 Yes 0.01 Paired t- Time 0 End of Study Significant test Measure Group Average SD Average SD Change p-value Organoid 133.25 29.28 79.33 7.02 0.24 spGrav l 1.034 0.009 1.025 0.003 Yes 0.02 Organoid 1.027 0.009 1.026 0.005 0.73 Measure Represents Association with CKD BUN urea handling sed eGFR, tubular dysfunction early indicator of decreased kidney function; Hgb measures of anemia EPO dysfunction associated with increased risk for CKD WBC* inflammation progression decrease indicative of impaired tubule spGrav urine concentration function *the WBC here would not reflect a T-cell mediated response as these animals are c Histological Overview of Kidneys from Model Histopathology demonstrated that control animals had progressed to mild, developing pathy by terminal ice.

Injury-related gs were primarily tubular in nature with y, dilation, and proteinaceous casts usually mild in severity. Tubular basophilia and fibrosis were often minimal and interstitial inflammation was typically minimal or absent. Glomerular changes were minimal in severity.

Capsular fibrosis/inflammation was typically only minimal in severity and was characterized by little inflammatory cellular content; the reaction may have been diminished by the lete immune system in the athymic nude rat. Mineralization and lymphocytic infiltration were of low incidence and severity in Batch 1 animals. Occasional focal mineralization, common in tory rats, was observed.

There were no significant differences noted between ted and NKO treated groups.

Table 7 Measure Normal Untreated NKO Treated Tubulo-Interstital Injury 0.0 + 0.1 1.4 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.4 Glomerular Injury 0.0 0.8 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.5 NKO Effect on Survival ] All animals (59% KMR) survived until end of study (119 days post-Tx and 204 days post-nephrectomy) ore no nable survival benefit of NKO treatment was detected.

Engraftment of Human NKO Detected with Staining Methods at EOS As this model allows xenogeneic application of a human product, tracking of human cells within the rat kidney was possible through use of human cell fying antibodies. Staining for human HLA1 within the background of the RKM rat kidney identified cells 4 months post-treatment, see Figure 12. Identification of staining considered consistent with engraftment of human cells was confirmed by two independent reviewers.

Typically 1 or 2 cells were identified in one of four sections d for each animal and were incorporated into tubules, although one cluster was identified within the interstitium.

CONCLUSIONS: • Organoid (NKO) delivery mitigated significant changes associated with kidney disease ssion in l animals and included measures effected by syngeneic/autologous NKA deliveries to disease models.

• Effected measures were consistent with those observed with syngeneic/autologous NKA deliveries to disease models – measures of anemia (Hct, Hgb, RBC), inflammation (WBC), urine concentration (spGrav) and ly azotemia (BUN).

• Human cells in very low numbers were detected approximately 4 months post- treatment with NKO prototype.

• Nephrectomy of nude rats (59% KMR, average) resulted in a state of early stage and chronically progressive renal insufficiency characterized by developing anemia, proteinuria, dyslipidemia and le indications of early stage azotemia.

• All animals survived until end of study.

• Procedures utilized to r human organoids to the RKM model were well tolerated.

Example 5- Isolation & Characterization of Bioresponsive Renal Cells A case of idiopathic progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) with anemia in an adult male swine (Sus scrofa) provided fresh diseased kidney tissue for the assessment of cellular composition and characterization with direct comparison to age-matched normal swine kidney tissue. Histological examination of the kidney tissue at the time of harvest confirmed renal disease terized by severe diffuse chronic interstitial fibrosis and crescentic glomerulonephritis with multifocal fibrosis. Clinical try confirmed azotemia tion of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine), and mild anemia (mild reduction in hematocrit and depressed hemoglobin levels). Cells were ed, expanded, and characterized from both ed and normal kidney tissue. As shown in Figure 1 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), a Gomori’s Trichrome stain ghs the fibrosis (blue staining indicated by ) in the diseased kidney tissue compared to the normal kidney tissue. Functional r cells, sing cubulin:megalin and capable of receptor-mediated albumin transport, were propagated from both normal and diseased kidney tissue. Erythropoietin (EPO)-expressing cells were also present in the cultures and were retained through multiple passages and freeze/thaw cycles. Furthermore, molecular analyses confirmed that the EPO-expressing cells from both normal and diseased tissue responded to hypoxic conditions in vitro with HIF1α-driven induction of EPO and other hypoxia-regulated gene targets, including vEGF. Cells were isolated from the porcine kidney tissue via enzymatic digestion with collagenase + dispase, and were also isolated in separate experiments by performing simple mechanical digestion and explant culture. At passage two, explant-derived cell cultures containing pressing cells were subjected to both atmospheric (21%) and varying hypoxic (<5%) e conditions to ine whether exposure to a culminated in upregulation of EPO gene expression. As noted with rodent cultures (see Example 3), the normal pig displayed oxygen-dependent sion and regulation of the EPO gene. Surprisingly, despite the uremic / anemic state of the CKD pig (Hematocrit <34, Creatinine >9.0) EPO expressing cells were easily isolated and propagated from the tissue and expression of the EPO gene remained hypoxia regulated, as shown in Figure 2 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). As shown in Figure 3 of Presnell et al.

WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), cells in the propagated cultures demonstrated the y to self-organize into tubule-like structures. As shown in Figure 4 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), the presence of functional tubular cells in the e (at passage 3) was confirmed by observing receptor-mediated uptake of FITC-conjugated n by the cultured cells.

The green dots (indicated by thin white arrows) represent endocytosed sceinconjugated albumin which is mediated by r cell-specific receptors, Megalin and Cubilin, indicating n reabosroption by functional tubular cells. The blue staining (indicated by thick white arrows) is Hoescht-stained nuclei. Taken together, these data suggest that functional tubular and endocrine cells can be isolated and propagated from porcine renal s, even in renal tissues that have been severely compromised with CKD.

Furthermore, these findings support the advancement of autologous cell-based therapeutic products for the treatment of CKD.

In addition, EPO-producing cells were isolated enzymatically from normal adult human kidney (as described above in Example 1). As shown in Figure 5 of Presnell et al. 0/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), the isolation procedure resulted in more relative EPO expression after isolation than in the initial tissue.

As shown in Figure 6 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its ty), it is possible to maintain the human EPO ing cells in culture with retention of EPO gene expression. Human cells were cultured/propagated on plain tissueculture treated plastic or plastic that had been coated with some extracellular matrix, such as, for instance, fibronectin or collagen, and all were found to support EPO expression over time.

Example 6 – Isolation & enrichment of specific bioreactive renal cells Kidney cell ion: Briefly, batches of 10, 2-week-old male Lewis rat kidneys were obtained from a commercial supplier (Hilltop Lab Animals Inc.) and shipped overnight in Viaspan preservation medium at a temperature around 4°C. All steps described herein were d out in a biological safety cabinet (BSC) to preserve sterility. The kidneys were washed in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) 3 times to rinse out the Viaspan preservation medium. After the third wash the ing kidney capsules were removed as well as any remaining stromaltissue. The major calyx was also removed using micro dissection techniques. The kidneys were then finely minced into a slurry using a sterile scalpel. The slurry was then transferred into a 50ml conical fuge tube and weighed. A small sample was collected for RNA and placed into an RNAse-free sterile 1.5ml micro-centrifuge tube and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Once frozen, it was then transferred to the -80 degree freezer until analysis. The tissue weight of 10 juvenile kidneys d approximately 1 gram. Based on the weight of the batch, the digestion medium was adjusted to deliver 20mls of digestion medium per 1 gram of tissue. Digestion buffer for this procedure contained 4 Units of Dispase 1(Stem Cell Tech) in HBSS, 300Units/ml of Collagenase type IV (Worthington) with 5mM CaCl2 (Sigma).

The appropriate volume of pre-warmed digestion buffer was added to the tube, which was then sealed and placed on a rocker in a 37ºC incubator for 20 s. This first digestion step removes many red blood cells and enhances the digestion of the remaining tissue. After 20 minutes, the tube was removed and placed in the BSC. The tissue was allowed to settle at the bottom of the tube and then the supernatant was removed. The remaining tissue was then supplemented with fresh digestion buffer equaling the starting volume. The tube was again placed on a rocker in a 37ºC incubator for an additional 30 minutes.

After 30 minutes the digestion mixture was pipetted through a 70µm cell er (BD Falcon) into an equal volume of neutralization buffer (DMEM w/ 10% FBS) to stop the ion on. The cell suspension was then washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 min. After centrifugation, the pellet was then re-suspended in 20mls KSFM medium and a sample acquired for cell counting and ity assessment using trypan blue exclusion. Once the cell count was calculated, 1 million cells were collected for RNA, washed in PBS, and snap frozen in liquid en. The remaining cell suspension was brought up to 50mls with KSFM medium and washed again by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 minutes. After washing, the cell pellet was re-suspended in a concentration of 15 million cells per ml of KSFM.

] Five milliliters of kidney cell suspension were then added to 5mls of 30% (w/v) Optiprep® in 15ml conical centrifuge tubes (BD Falcon) and mixed by inversion 6 times. This formed a final mixture of 15% (w/v) of Optiprep®. Post ion, tubes were carefully layered with 1 mL PBS. The tubes were centrifuged at 800 x g for 15 minutes without brake. After fugation, the tubes were removed and a cell band was formed at the top of the mixing gradient. There was also a pellet ning red blood cells, dead cells, and a small population of live cells that included some small less granular cells, some epoproducing cells, some tubular cells, and some endothelial cells. The band was carefully removed using a pipette and transferred to another 15ml conical tube. The gradient medium was removed by aspiration and the pellet was collected by re-suspension in 1 ml KSFM. The band cells and pellet cells were then recombined and re-suspended in at least 3 dilutions of the collected band volume using KSFM and washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 minutes. Post washing, the cells were re-suspended in 20mls of KSFM and a sample for cell counting was collected. Once the cell count was calculated using trypan blue exclusion, 1 million cells were collected for an RNA , washed in PBS, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Pre-Culture ‘Clean-up’ to enhance viability and culture performance of Specific Bioactive Renal Cells Using Density Gradient Separation: To yield a clean, viable population of cells for culture, a cell suspension was first generated as described above in “Kidney Cell Isolation”. As an optional step and as a means of ng up the initial ation, up to 100 million total cells, suspended in e isotonic buffer were mixed thoroughly 1:1 with an equal volume of 30% Optiprep® prepared at room temperature from stock 60% (w/v) iodixanol (thus yielding a final 15% w/v Optiprep solution) and mixed thoroughly by inversion six times. After mixing, 1ml PBS buffer was carefully layered on top of the mixed cell sion. The gradient tubes were then carefully loaded into the centrifuge, ensuring riate balance. The nt tubes were centrifuged at 800 x g for 15 s at 25˚C without brake. The cleaned-up cell population (containing viable and functional collecting duct, tubular, endocrine, glomerular, and vascular cells) segmented between 6% and 8% (w/v) Optiprep®, corresponding to a y between 1.025 – 1.045 g/mL. Other cells and debris pelleted to the bottom of the tube.

Kidney Cell Culture: The combined cell band and pellet were then plated in tissue culture treated triple flasks (Nunc T500) or equivalent at a cell concentration of ,000 cells per cm2 in 150mls of a 50:50 e of DMEM(high glucose)/KSFM containing % (v/v)FBS, 2.5µg EGF, 25mg BPE, 1X ITS (insulin/transferrin/sodium selenite medium supplement) with antibiotic/antimycotic. The cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator for 2-3 days, providing a 21% atmospheric oxygen level for the cells. After two days, the medium was changed and the cultures were placed in 2% -level environment provided by a CO2 gen gas multigas humidified incubator (Sanyo) for 24hrs. Following the 24hr incubation, the cells were washed with 60mls of 1XPBS and then removed using 40mls 0.25% (w/v) trypsin/EDTA (Gibco). Upon removal, the cell sion was neutralized with an equal volume of KSFM containing 10% FBS. The cells were then washed by fugation 300xg for 10 minutes. After washing, the cells were re-suspended in 20mls of KSFM and transferred to a 50ml l tube and a sample was collected for cell counting. Once the viable cell count was determined using trypan blue exclusion, 1 million cells were collected for an RNA sample, washed in PBS, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen.

The cells were washed again in PBS and collected by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 minutes.

The washed cell pellet was re-suspended in KSFM at a tration of 37.5 million cells/ml.

Enriching for Specific Bioactive Renal Cells Using Density Step Gradient tion: Cultured kidney cells, predominantly composed of renal tubular cells but containing small subpopulations of other cell types (collecting duct, glomerular, vascular, and endocrine) were separated into their component subpopulations using a density step gradient made from multiple concentrations w/v of iodixanol (Optiprep). The cultures were placed into a hypoxic environment for up to 24 hours prior to harvest and application to the gradient. A stepped gradient was created by layering four different density mediums on top of each other in a sterile 15mL conical tube, placing the solution with the highest density on the bottom and layering to the least dense solution on the top. Cells were applied to the top of the step nt and centrifuged, which resulted in segregation of the population into multiple bands based on size and granularity. y, densities of 7, 11, 13, and 16% Optiprep® (60% w/v Iodixanol) were made using KFSM medium as ts. For example: for 50mls of 7%(w/v) Optiprep®, .83mls of stock 60% (w/v) Iodixanol was added to 44.17mls of KSFM medium and mixed well by inversion. A peristaltic pump (Master Flex L/S) loaded with sterile L/S 16 Tygon tubing connected to sterile ary tubes was set to a flow rate of 2 ml per minute, and 2 mL of each of the four solutions was loaded into a sterile conical 15 mL tube, beginning with the 16% solution, followed by the 13% solution, the 11% solution, and the 7% solution. y, 2 mL of cell suspension containing 75 million cultured rodent kidney cells was loaded atop the step gradient (suspensions having been ted as described above in ‘Kidney cell Culture’). Importantly, as the pump was started to deliver the gradient solutions to the tube, care was taken to allow the fluid to flow slowly down the side of the tube at a 45° angle to insure that a proper interface formed n each layer of the nt. The step gradients, loaded with cells, were then centrifuged at 800 x g for 20 minutes t brake.

After centrifugation, the tubes were carefully removed so as not to disturb each interface.

Five distinct cell fractions resulted (4 bands and a pellet) (B1 – B4, + Pellet) (see Figure 26, left conical tube). Each fraction was collected using either a sterile disposable bulb pipette or a 5ml pipette and characterized phenotypically and functionally (See Example 10 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328). When rodent kidney cell suspensions are subjected to step-gradient fractionation immediately after isolation, the fraction enriched for tubular cells (and containing some cells from the collecting duct) segments to a density between 1.062 – 1.088 g/mL. In contrast, when y gradient separation was performed after ex vivo culture, the fraction enriched for r cells (and containing some cells from the collecting duct) segmented to a density between 1.051 – 1.062 g/mL. Similarly, when rodent kidney cell suspensions are subjected to step-gradient fractionation immediately after isolation, the fraction ed for epo-producing cells, glomerular podocytes, and vascular cells (“B4”) segregates at a density between 1.025 – 1.035 g/mL. In contrast, when density nt separation was performed after ex vivo culture, the fraction enriched for epoproducing cells, glomerular podocytes, and vascular cells (“B4”) segregated at a density between 1.073 – 1.091 g/mL. Importantly, the post-culture distribution of cells into both the “B2” and the “B4” ons was enhanced by exposure (for a period of about 1 hour to a period of about 24 hours) of the cultures to a hypoxic culture environment (hypoxia being defined as <21% (atmospheric) oxygen levels prior to harvest and radient procedures (additional details ing hypoxia-effects on band distribution are provided in Example Each band was washed by diluting with 3x the volume of KSFM, mixed well, and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 300 x g. Pellets were re-suspended in 2mls of KSFM and viable cells were counted using trypan blue exclusion and a hemacytometer. 1 million cells were collected for an RNA sample, washed in PBS, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cells from B2 and B4 were used for transplantation studies into uremic and anemic female rats, generated via a two-step 5/6 ctomy procedure at Charles River Laboratories.

Characteristics of B4 were med by tative real-time PCR, including oxygenregulated expression of erythropoietin and vEGF, expression of glomerular markers (nephrin, podocin), and expression of vascular markers ). Phenotype of the ‘B2’ fraction was confirmed via expression of E-Cadherin, N-Cadherin, and Aquaporin-2. See Figures 49a and 49b of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328.

Thus, use of the step gradient strategy allows not only the enrichment for a rare population of oducing cells (B4), but also a means to generate relatively enriched fractions of functional tubular cells (B2) (see Figures 50 & 51 of Presnell et al.

WO/2010/056328). The step gradient strategy also allows oducing and tubular cells to be separated from red blood cells, cellular debris, and other potentially undesirable cell types, such as large cell aggregates and certain types of immune cells.

The step gradient procedure may e tuning with regard to specific densities employed to provide good tion of cellular components. The preferred approach to tuning the gradient involves 1) running a continuous density gradient where from a high density at the bottom of the gradient (16-21% Optiprep, for example) to a relatively low density at the top of the nt (5-10%, for example). Continuous gradients can be prepared with any standard y gradient solution (Ficoll, Percoll, Sucrose, iodixanol) according to standard methods (Axis Shield). Cells of interest are loaded onto the continuous nt and centrifuged at 800xG for 20 minutes t brake. Cells of similar size and granularity tend to segregate together in the gradients, such that the relative position in the gradient can be measured, and the specific gravity of the solution at that position also measured. Thus, subsequently, a defined step gradient can be derived that focuses isolation of particular cell tions based on their ability to transverse the density gradient under specific conditions. Such optimization may need to be employed when isolating cells from unhealthy vs. healthy tissue, or when isolating specific cells from different species. For e, optimization was conducted on both canine and human renal cell cultures, to insure that the specific B2 and B4 subpopulations that were identified in the rat were isolatable from the other s. The l gradient for isolation of rodent B2 and B4 subpopulations consists of (w/v) of 7%, 11%, 13%, and 16% Optiprep. The optimal gradient for isolation of canine B2 and B4 subpopulations consists of (w/v) of 7%, %, 11%, and 16% Optiprep. The l gradient for isolation of human B2 and B4 subpopulations consists of (w/v) 7%, 9%, 11%, 16%. Thus, the y range for localization of B2 and B4 from cultured rodent, canine, and human renal cells is provided in Table 8.

Table 8. Species Density Ranges.

Species Density Ranges g/ml Step Gradient Band Rodent Canine Human B2 1.045-1.063g/ml 1.045-1.058g/ml 1.045-1.052g/ml B4 1.073-1.091g/ml 1.063-1.091g/ml 1.063-1.091g/ml Example 7 – ygen culture prior to gradient affects band distribution, composition, and gene expression To determine the effect of oxygen conditions on distribution and composition of prototypes B2 and B4, ney cell preparations from different species were exposed to different oxygen conditions prior to the gradient step. A rodent neokidney augmentation (NKA) cell preparation (RK069) was established using standard procedures for rat cell isolation and culture initiation, as described supra. All flasks were cultured for 2-3 days in 21% (atmospheric) oxygen conditions. Media was changed and half of the flasks were then relocated to an oxygen-controlled tor set to 2% oxygen, while the remaining flasks were kept at the 21% oxygen conditions, for an additional 24 hours.

Cells were then harvested from each set of conditions using standard tic harvesting procedures described supra. Step gradients were ed according to rd procedures and the “normoxic” (21% oxygen) and “hypoxic” (2% oxygen) cultures were ted separately and applied side-by-side to identical step gradients. (Figure 27). While 4 bands and a pellet were generated in both conditions, the distribution of the cells hout the gradient was different in 21% and 2% oxygen-cultured batches (Table 3).

Specifically, the yield of B2 was increased with hypoxia, with a concomitant decrease in B3.

Furthermore, the expression of cific genes (such as erythropoietin) was enhanced in the resulting nt generated from the hypoxic-cultured cells (Figure 73 of Presnell et al.

WO/2010/056328).

A canine NKA cell preparation (DK008) was established using standard procedures for dog cell isolation and culture (analogous to rodent ion and culture procedures), as described supra. All flasks were cultured for 4 days in 21% (atmospheric) oxygen conditions, then a subset of flasks were transferred to hypoxia (2%) for 24 hours while a subset of the flasks were ined at 21%. Subsequently, each set of flasks was harvested and subjected to identical step gradients (Figure 28). Similar to the rat results (Example 6), the hypoxic-cultured dog cells distributed throughout the nt differently than the atmospheric oxygen-cultured dog cells (Table 9). Again, the yield of B2 was increased with hypoxic exposure prior to gradient, along with a concomitant decrease in distribution into B3.

Table 9.

Rat (RK069) Dog (DK008) 2% O2 21% O2 2% O2 21% O2 B1 0.77% 0.24% 1.20% 0.70% B2 88.50% 79.90% 64.80% 36.70% B3 10.50% 19.80% 29.10% 40.20% B4 0.23% 0.17% 4.40% 21.90% ] The above data show that pre-gradient exposure to hypoxia enhances composition of B2 as well as the bution of specific lized cells (erythropoietinproducing cells, vascular cells, and glomerular cells) into B4. Thus, hypoxic culture, followed by density-gradient separation as described supra, is an effective way to generate ‘B2’ and ‘B4’ cell populations, across species.

Example 8 – Isolation of tubular/glomerular cells from human kidney Tubular and ular cells were isolated and propagated from normal human kidney tissue by the enzymatic isolation methods described throughout. By the gradient method described above, the r cell fraction was ed ex vivo and after culture. As shown in Figure 68 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), phenotypic utes were maintained in isolation and propagation. Tubular cell function, assessed via uptake of labeled albumin, was also retained after repeated passage and cryopreservation. Figure 69 of Presnell et al.

WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) shows that when tubular-enriched and tubular-depleted populations were cultured in 3D dynamic culture, a marked se in expression of tubular , cadherin, was expressed in the renriched population. This confirms that the enrichment of tubular cells can be maintained beyond the initial enrichment when the cells are cultured in a 3D dynamic environment. The same cultured population of kidney cells described above in Example 7 was subjected to flow cytometric analysis to examine forward scatter and side scatter. The small, less granular EPO-producing cell population was discernable (8.15%) and was separated via positive selection of the small, less ar population using the sorting capability of a flow cytometer (see Figure 70 of Presnell et al. WO/2010/056328 (incorporated herein by reference in its ty)). e 9 - Characterization of an unfractionated mixture of renal cells isolated from an mune glomerulonephritis patient sample An unfractionated mixture of renal cells was isolated, as described above, from an autoimmune glomerulonephritis patient sample. To determine the unbiased genotypic composition of specific subpopulations of renal cells isolated and expanded from kidney tissue, quantitative real time PCR (qRTPCR) analysis (Brunskill et al., supra 2008) was employed to identify ential ype-specific and pathway-specific gene expression patterns among the cell subfractions. As shown in Table 6.1 of Ilagan et al.

, HK20 is an autoimmune glomerulonephritis patient sample. As shown in Table 6.2 of Ilagan et al. , cells generated from HK20 are lacking glomerular cells, as ined by qRTPCR.

EXAMPLE 11 – Enrichment/Depletion of Viable Kidney Cell Types Using Fluorescent ted Cell Sorting (FACS) One or more isolated kidney cells may be enriched, and/or one or more specific kidney cell types may be depleted from isolated primary kidney tissue using fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS).

REAGENTS: 70% ethanol; Wash buffer (PBS ); 50:50 Kidney cell medium (50%DMEM high glucose): 50% Keratinocyte-SFM; Trypan Blue 0.4%; Primary antibodies to target kidney cell population such as CD31 for kidney elial cells and Nephrin for kidney glomerular cells. Matched isotype specific fluorescent secondary antibodies; Staining buffer ( 0.05% BSA in PBS).

PROCEDURE: Following standard procedures for ng the biological safety cabinet (BSC), a single cell suspension of kidney cells from either primary ion or cultured cells may be obtained from a T500 T/C treated flask and resuspend in kidney cell medium and place on ice. Cell count and ity is then ined using trypan blue exclusion method. For kidney cell enrichment/depletion of, for example, glomerular cells or endothelial cells from a heterogeneous population, between 10 and 50 x106 live cells with a viability of at least 70% are obtained. The heterogeneous tion of kidney cells is then d with primary dy specific for target cell type at a starting concentration of 1µg/0.1ml of staining buffer/1 x 106 cells (titer if necessary). Target antibody can be conjugated such as CD31 PE (specific for kidney endothelial cells) or un-conjugated such as n (specific for kidney glomerular cells).

Cells are then stained for 30 minutes on ice or at 4ºC protected from light.

After 30 minutes of incubation, cells are washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 min. The pellet is then resuspended in either PBS or staining buffer depending on whether a conjugated isotype specific secondary antibody is ed. If cells are labeled with a fluorochrome conjugated primary antibody, cells are resuspended in 2mls of PBS per 10 x107 cells and proceed to FACS aria or equivalent cell sorter. If cells are not labeled with a fluorochrome conjugated antibody, then cells are labeled with an isotype specific fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibody at a starting concentration of 1ug/0.1ml/1x106 cells.

Cells are then stained for 30 min. on ice or at 4ºC protected from light. After minutes of incubation, cells are washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 min. After centrifugation, the pellet is resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 5x106/ml of PBS and then 4mls per 12x75mm is transferred to a sterile tube.

FACs Aria is prepared for live cell sterile sorting per manufacturer’s instructions (BD FACs Aria User Manual). The sample tube is loaded into the FACs Aria and PMT voltages are adjusted after acquisition begins. The gates are drawn to select kidney specific cells types using fluorescent intensity using a ic wavelength. Another gate is drawn to select the ve tion. Once the desired gates have been drawn to encapsulate the positive target population and the negative tion, the cells are sorted using manufacturer’s instructions.

The positive target population is collected in one 15ml conical tube and the negative population in another 15 ml conical tube filled with 1 ml of kidney cell medium.

After collection, a sample from each tube is analyzed by flow cytometry to determine purity.

Collected cells are washed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 min. and the pellet is resuspended in kidney cell medium for further analysis and experimentation.

EXAMPLE 12 – Enrichment/Depletion of Kidney Cell Types Using Magnetic Cell Sorting One or more isolated kidney cells may be enriched and/or one or more specific kidney cell types may be depleted from isolated y kidney tissue.

TS: 70% ethanol, Wash buffer (PBS ), 50:50 Kidney cell medium EM high glucose): 50% Keratinocyte-SFM, Trypan Blue 0.4%, Running Buffer(PBS, 2mM EDTA,0.5% BSA), Rinsing Buffer (PBS,2mM EDTA), ng on (70% v/v ethanol), Miltenyi FCR Blocking reagent, Miltenyi microbeads ic for either IgG isotype, target antibody such as CD31(PECAM) or Nephrin, or secondary antibody.

PROCEDURE: Following standard procedures for cleaning the biological safety cabinet (BSC), a single cell suspension of kidney cells from either y isolation or culture is obtained and resuspended in kidney cell medium. Cell count and viability is determined using trypan blue exclusion method. For kidney cell enrichment/depletion of, for e, glomerular cells or elial cells from a heterogeneous population, at least 10x106 up to 4 x109 live cells with a viability of at least 70% is obtained.

The best separation for enrichment/depletion approach is determined based on target cell of interest. For enrichment of a target frequency of less than 10%, for example, glomerular cells using Nephrin antibody, the Miltenyi autoMACS, or equivalent, instrument program POSSELDS (double positive selection in sensitive mode) is used. For ion of a target frequency of r than 10%, the yi autoMACS, or equivalent, instrument program DEPLETES (depletion in sensitive mode) is used.

Live cells are labeled with target specific primary antibody, for example, Nephrin rb polyclonal antibody for glomerular cells, by adding 1µg/10x106 cells/0.1ml of PBS with 0.05% BSA in a 15ml conical fuge tube, followed by incubation for 15 minutes at 4ºC.

After labeling, cells are washed to remove d primary dy by adding 1-2ml of buffer per 10 x107 cells followed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5min. After washing, isotype specific secondary antibody, such as n anti-rabbit PE at 1ug/10x106/0.1ml of PBS with 0.05% BSA, is added, followed by incubation for 15 minutes at 4ºC.

After incubation, cells are washed to remove d ary antibody by adding 1-2ml of buffer per 10 x107 cells followed by centrifugation at 300xg for 5 min. The supernatant is removed, and the cell pellet is resuspended in 60µl of buffer per 10 x107 total cells followed by addition of 20µl of FCR blocking t per 10 x107 total cells, which is then mixed well.

Add 20 µl of direct MACS microbeads (such as anti-PE microbeads) and mix and then te for 15 min at 4ºC.

After incubation, cells are washed by adding 10-20x the labeling volume of buffer and centrifuging the cell suspension at 300xg for 5 min. and resuspending the cell pellet in 500µl -2mls of buffer per 10 x108 cells.

Per manufacturer’s instructions, the autoMACS system is cleaned and primed in preparation for magnetic cell separation using autoMACS. New sterile collection tubes are placed under the outlet ports. The autoMACS cell separation program is chosen. For selection the POSSELDS program is chosen. For depletion the DEPLETES program is chosen.

The labeled cells are inserted at uptake port, then beginning the program.

After cell selection or depletion, samples are collected and placed on ice until use. Purity of the depleted or selected sample is verified by flow cytometry.

EXAMPLE 13 – Cells with therapeutic potential can be isolated and propagated from normal and chronically-diseased kidney tissue The objective of the present study was to determine the functional characterization of human NKA cells h high content analysis (HCA). ontent imaging (HCI) provides aneous imaging of multiple sub-cellular events using two or more fluorescent probes (multiplexing) across a number of samples. High-content Analysis (HCA) provides simultaneous quantitative ement of multiple cellular parameters captured in High-Content Images. In brief, unfractionated (UNFX) cultures were generated (Aboushwareb et al., supra 2008) and maintained ndently from core biopsies taken from five human kidneys with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three non-CKD human kidneys using standard biopsy procedures. After (2) passages of UNFX ex vivo, cells were harvested and subjected to density gradient methods (as in Example 2) to generate subfractions, including subfractions B2, B3, and/or B4.

Human kidney tissues were procured from non-CKD and CKD human donors as summarized in Table 10.1 of Ilagan et al. . Figure 4 of Ilagan et al. shows histopathologic features of the HK17 and HK19 s. Ex vivo cultures were established from all non-CKD (3/3) and CKD (5/5) kidneys. High t analysis (HCA) of albumin transport in human NKA cells defining regions of interest (ROI) is shown in Figure 5 (HCA of albumin transport in human NKA cells) of Ilagan et al.

. Quantitative comparison of albumin ort in NKA cells d from non-CKD and CKD kidney is shown in Figure 6 of Ilagan et al. .

As shown in Figure 6 of Ilagan et al. , albumin transport is not mised in CKD-derived NKA cultures. Comparative analysis of marker sion between tubular-enriched B2 and tubular cell-depleted B4 subfractions is shown in Figure 7 (CK8/18/19) of Ilagan et al. .

] Comparative functional analysis of albumin transport between tubularenriched B2 and tubular cell-depleted B4 subfractions is shown in Figure 8 of Ilagan et al.

. Subfraction B2 is enriched in proximal tubule cells and thus ts increased albumin-transport on.

Albumin uptake: Culture media of cells grown to confluency in 24-well, collagen IV plates (BD Biocoat ™) was replaced for 18-24 hours with phenol red-free, serumfree , low-glucose DMEM (pr-/s-/lg DMEM) containing 1X antimycotic/antibiotic and 2mM glutamine. Immediately prior to assay, cells were washed and incubated for 30 minutes with /lg DMEM + 10mM HEPES, 2mM glutamine,1.8mM CaCl2, and 1mM MgCl2. Cells were d to 25μg/mL rhodamine-conjugated bovine albumin (Invitrogen) for 30 min, washed with ice cold PBS to stop endocytosis and fixed immediately with 2% paraformaldehyde containing 25 μg/mL Hoechst nuclear dye. For inhibition experiments, 1μM receptor- associated protein (RAP) (Ray Biotech, Inc., Norcross GA) was added 10 minutes prior to albumin addition. Microscopic imaging and analysis was performed with a BD Pathway™ 855 High-Content BioImager (Becton son) (see Kelley et al. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010 Nov; 299(5):F1026-39. Epub Sep 8, 2010).

] In conclusion, HCA yields cellular level data and can reveal populations dynamics that are undetectable by other assays, i.e., gene or protein expression. A quantifiable ex-vivo HCA assay for measuring albumin transport (HCA-AT) function can be utilized to characterize human renal tubular cells as components of human NKA prototypes.

HCA-AT enabled comparative evaluation of cellular function, g that n transport-competent cells were retained in NKA cultures derived from human CKD kidneys.

It was also shown that specific subfractions of NKA cultures, B2 and B4, were distinct in ype and on, with B2 representing a tubular cell-enriched fraction with enhanced albumin transport activity. The B2 cell subpopulation from human CKD are phenotypically and functionally analogous to rodent B2 cells that demonstrated efficacy in vivo (as shown above).

Literature nces 1. Kelley, R. et al. renal Transplantation of Bioactive Renal Cells Preserves Renal Functions and Extends Survival in the ZSFI model of Progressive Diabetic Nephropathy. 2011 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Conference. (2011). 2. Kelley, R. et al. Tubular cell-enriched subpopulation of primary renal cells improves survival and augments kidney function in rodent model of c kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299, F1026-1039. 3. Presnell, S.C. et al. (2011) Isolation, Characterization, and Expansion s for Defined Primary Renal Cell Populations from Rodent, Canine, and Human Normal and Diseased Kidneys. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17:261-273. 4. Humphreys, B.D. et al. Repair of injured proximal tubule does not involve specialized progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 9226-9231. . wareb, T. et al. Erythropoietin producing cells for potential cell y.

World J Urol 26, 295-300 (2008). 6. Takano, Y. et al. Recovery and maintenance of nephrin expression in cultured podocytes and identification of HGF as a repressor of n. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292, F1573-1582 . 7. Basu, J. et al. ion of the human adipose-derived stromal vascular cell fraction yields a population of smooth muscle-like cells with markedly distinct phenotypic and functional properties relative to mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17, 843-860. 8. Basu, J. et al. Organ specific regenerative markers in peri-organ adipose: kidney.

Lipids Health Dis 10, 171. 9. Xinaris C, et al. In vivo maturation of functional renal organoids formed from embryonic cell suspensions. J Am Soc Nephrol 23,1-12. (2012).

. Buzhor et al. Kidney ids Recapitulate Tubular ids Leading to Enhanced Tubulogenic Potency of Human Kideny-Derived Cells Tissue Engineering Part A, . 11. Brown, SA et al., Impaired renal gulatory ability in dogs with reduced renal mass. J Am Soc Nephrol. 5:1768-74 (1995). 12. Robertson, J.L. et al., Long-term renal responses to high dietary protein in dogs with 75% nephrectomy. Kidney Int. 29:511-9 (1986). 13. Urie, B.K. et al., Evaluation of clinical status, renal function, and hematopoietic variables after unilateral nephrectomy in canine kidney donors. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 230:1653-6 (2007).

What is claimed is: 1. A method of forming a spheroid comprising: suspension culturing a heterogeneous renal cell population and a bioactive cell population in cell culture media in a 3-dimensional (D) culture , wherein the 3D culture system comprises a spinner and lacks an exogenous scaffold to which cells of the heterogenerous renal cell population attach; wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population is ed for renal r cells, and wherein the bioactive cell population is a non-renal endothelial cell population, a non-renal endothelial progenitor cell population, a non-renal mesenchymal stem cell population, or a non-renal adipose-derived progenitor cell population. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population further comprises epithelial cells from the collecting duct. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the bioactive cell population is the non-renal elial cell population. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the non-renal endothelial cell population is a cell line.

. The method of claim 4 wherein the cell line comprises human umbilical vascular endothelial cells. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the heterogeneous renal cell tion and the ive cell population are xenogeneic, syngeneic, allogeneic, or gous. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population and the bioactive cell population are cultured tely for a first time period, combined and cultured for a second time period. 8. The method of claim 7 n the second time period is at least 24 hours. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the second time period is 24 hours to 72 hours.

. The method of claim 1 wherein cells of the heterogeneous renal cell population and the bioactive cell population are at a ratio of 1:1. 11. A id made according the method of any one of claims 1 to 10. 12. An ed cluster of cells comprising a heterogeneous renal cell population and a ive cell population, wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population is enriched for renal r cells, n the bioactive cell population is a non-renal endothelial cell population, a non-renal endothelial progenitor cell population, a non-renal mesenchymal stem cell population, or a non-renal adipose-derived progenitor cell population; and wherein the cluster of cells is cultured in media in suspension without attachment to a scaffold. 13. The isolated cluster of cells of claim 12 wherein the bioactive cell population is the non-renal endothelial cell tion. 14. The isolated cluster of cells of claim 13 wherein the heterogeneous renal cell population further comprises epithelial cells from the collecting duct.

. The isolated cluster of cells of claim 13 wherein the non-renal endothelial cell population is a cell line. 16. The isolated cluster of cells of claim 15 wherein the cell line ses human umbilical vascular endothelial HUVEC cells. 17. An injectable formulation comprising at least one cluster of cells as claimed in any of claims 12-16 and a liquid medium. 18. The formulation of claim 17, wherein the liquid medium is selected from a cell growth medium, Dulbecco’s ate buffered saline DPBS and combinations thereof. 19. The formulation of claim 18 wherein the liquid medium is DPBS.

. The formulation of claim 17, n the at least cluster of cells is suspended in the liquid medium. 21. An injectable formulation comprising at least one cluster of cells as claimed in any of claims 12 to 16 and a hydrogel. 22. The formulation of claim 21, wherein the hydrogel comprises gelatin. 23. The ation of claim 22, wherein the gelatin is present in the formulation at about 0.5% to about 1% (w/v). 24. The formulation of claim 22, wherein the gelatin is present in the formulation at about 0.75% (w/v).

. Use of at least one cluster of cells as claimed in any one of claims 12-16 and a liquid medium in the manufacture of a medicament to treat kidney e in a subject in need thereof. 26. Use of at least one cluster of cells as claimed in any one of claims 12-16 and a hydrogel in the cture of a medicament to treat kidney disease in a subject in need thereof. 27. The use according to claim 25 or claim 26 wherein to treat kidney disease in the subject comprises an improvement in any one of the following measures of anemia (Hct, Hgb, RBC), mation (WBC), urine tration (spGrav) and azotemia (BUN). 28. The use of any one of claims 25 to 27, wherein the ment is ated for administration by injection. 29. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof.

. The spheroid according to claim 11, substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof. 31. The isolated cluster of cells according to any one of claims 12 to 16, substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof. 32. The formulation according to any one of claims 17 to 24, substantially as herein described with reference to any example thereof. 33. The use according to any one of claims 24 to 28, substantially as herein bed with reference to any example thereof. 1/12 104 104 Alexa Fluor 488-A 103 103 CD31+ CD31+ 9.32% 0.24% 102 102 101 Alexa Fluor 488-A 101 100 100 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A SSC-A ZSF1 Rat UNFX t ZSF1 post sort Neg flow thru 2/12 Alexa Fluor 488-A 103 CD31+ 89.94% 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A ZSF1 post sort CD31 + ion 3/12 104 104 2.15% (+) 0.5% (+) 103 103 PE-A 102 PE-A 102 101 101 100 100 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A SSC-A FX Norm p0 HK27 Norm Band 2 104 104 0.78% (+) 2.7% (+) 103 103 PE-A 102 PE-A 102 101 101 100 100 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A SSC-A HK27 2%O2 Band 2 HK27 UNFXp0 in EGM-2 on fibronectin 4/12 104 104 0% (+) 35.5% (+) 103 103 PE-A 102 PE-A 102 101 101 100 100 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A SSC-A HK27p0 CD31 neg sort HK27 CD31 + p1 in EGM-2 on ectin 1A /12 104 104 Alexa Fluor 594-A 103 Alexa Fluor 594-A 103 0.19% 91.23% 102 102 101 101 100 100 100 101 102 103 104 100 101 102 103 104 SSC-A SSC-A led control BWH001p1 2%O2 UNFX 1B 1C 6/12 7/12 8/12 9/12 /12 A B 11/12 12/12 C F B E A D