NZ715055B2 - Single axis solar tracking system - Google Patents

Abstract

solar tracking system with a plurality of tracking assemblies moved by a single motor (14). A method and system that prevents overloading the motor or tripping a circuit breaker due to an obstructed or impeded tracker includes sensing movement (162) of the tracker assemblies and entering into obstruction clearing modes. Obstruction clearing mode 1 (OCM1) (168) is a high frequency adjustable mode that prompts movement for an adjustable period of time. If movement commences, the system returns to a normal mode. If there is no movement, the system enters into an obstruction clearing mode 2 (OCM2) (176) which is an adjustable lower frequency series of attempts. If there is no movement, no further attempts are made. Each of these steps are monitored and controlled remotely. There are two types of secure connections for drivelines, torque tubes or affixing driveline linkages for high torque conditions. ruction clearing modes. Obstruction clearing mode 1 (OCM1) (168) is a high frequency adjustable mode that prompts movement for an adjustable period of time. If movement commences, the system returns to a normal mode. If there is no movement, the system enters into an obstruction clearing mode 2 (OCM2) (176) which is an adjustable lower frequency series of attempts. If there is no movement, no further attempts are made. Each of these steps are monitored and controlled remotely. There are two types of secure connections for drivelines, torque tubes or affixing driveline linkages for high torque conditions.

Description

SINGLE AXIS SOLAR TRACKING SYSTEM RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a continuation-in-part application of US. Patent Application Serial No. 12/137,764, entitled "SINGLE AXIS SOLAR TRACKING SYSTEM". filed June 12, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention (Technical Field): The presently claimed invention relates to solar energy production and more particularly to a method and apparatus for constructing mechanically linked, single axis solar ng systems of various tracking ries to follow the diurnal motion of the sun.

Background Art: Solar tracking systems utilized in renewable energy production are s that track the motion of the sun relative to the earth to maximize the tion of solar energy.

Solar trackers move to keep solar modules perpendicular to the sun in either one or two axes. The presently claimed invention applies to photovoltaic modules (PV) for ting electrical power, but may be applied to any solar energy collection device, such as solar thermal or material exposure testing devices. Solar trackers have been successfully deployed in the ry; however, the prior art designs have not adequately addressed the initial installation costs, flexibility in adaptation to site conditions, and reliability over the vely long lifetime (20+ years) of the system. In choosing a solar tracker system. one must consider all of the following variables: . PV module cost, . land cost, site ry and availability, . installation labor cost, 0 material cost, SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) o meteorological data, 0 operation and nance costs, 0 overall efficiency increase that the r provides.

The state of the art approaches have not fully optimized the combination of all the relevant cost issues. The energy gain provided by trackers is dependent upon the tracking geometry of the system and the location of the lation. A dual axis (D/A) tracker keeps the collector perpendicular to the sun on both axis’, and provides the greatest gain in energy production at any location. Single axis (S/A) trackers are fixed in one axis and typically track the daily motion of the sun in the other axis. Single axis tracker ries include tilted elevation, azimuth, and horizontal. Tilted elevation S/A trackers are tilted as a function of the location’s latitude and they track the sun’s daily motion about that tilted axis. Azimuth S/A rs are tilted at an optimum angle and follow the daily motion of the sun by rotating about the vertical axis. Horizontal S/A trackers are configured parallel to the ground and rotate about a North/South horizontal axis to track the sun’s daily motion. The energy gained varies for each type of tracking geometry and is dependent upon the latitude of the installation and the weather conditions at the installation location. Solar tracking systems for PV modules are commercially ble in single axis tilt and roll, single axis horizontal, single axis fixed tilt azimuth, and dual axis ries.

All trackers must be built strong enough to resist the wind forces in any tracking position or be “stowed” to reduce the effect of extreme wind forces. s also require periodic ng, which in many locations is ily accomplished by rain “washing” the modules. Snow can affect tracker operations, due to the occurrence of ice or the weight of snow on modules, or snowdrifts that interfere with tracker movement and the collection of solar energy. In addition, construction materials, electronics, drive components, and motors must be able to operate within temperature and climate constraints.

In many ations, the horizontal single axis tracker is the most cost effective tracker geometry. A horizontal S/A tracker structure may be supported at many points along SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) the rotating axis and, therefore, requires less complexity and less material for construction than other ng ries. The key to successful design of a tracking apparatus for PV modules is to e the maximum overall economic benefit, such as the initial apparatus cost, the installation cost, the land utilization, the cost and efficiency of the solar modules, and the ion and maintenance costs as well as the efficiency gain provided by the tracking geometry. As the cost of steel and other fabrication material rises, the horizontal tracking geometry is increasingly desirable. It minimizes the structural material requirements by keeping the s at a relatively low profile to the foundation, and at a minimum overhung moment load relative to the rotating axis t requiring special connections to rotate the system about its center of gravity.

The prior art horizontal axis trackers typically have connected each row of modules together with a linear motion linkage in an effort to minimize the number of drive motors required. Prior art mechanically linked horizontal and tilted single axis tracking systems require substantial mechanical linkages structurally capable of resisting high force loading due to overhung solar module weight and large forces induced by the wind.

The oming of this prior art system is that all of the wind forces are concentrated to a single point, through the mechanical e. The embodiment of the presently claimed invention specifically eliminates the need for a robust mechanical linkage e of resisting oad forces induced by the wind. The design of the current embodiments eliminates the transmittance of these wind forces to the linkage, and racts the al wind forces locally, within each tracker row or array such that the wind force is not transmitted to the e. The prior art also requires a separate, large foundation, or foundations, to anchor a single drive ism that rotates many rows of modules with a linear motion motor. One such device is a horizontal, single axis tracking system described in US Patent No. 6,058,930, to Shingleton. In this system, the horizontal rows of modules are linked together with a linear motion linkage and operated by a single linear actuator attached to a separate, large foundation. In addition to the prior art horizontal axis, mechanically linked trackers require generally flat or graded terrain for proper operation. Many columns must be installed at height SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) elevations and locations requiring high tolerance within 100+ columns, across two dimensions in a large area, for mechanical linkages between rows to line up for operation. This often requires extensive and costly site preparation. Some prior art linked ntal trackers have embodiments that allow for installation on ting terrain, but require expensive joints that must be fabricated onsite that also must resist the large forces d by the wind. These high force loaded pivoting joints are generally complicated and expensive to construct. Another disadvantage of the prior art is that they are designed as large rectangles with a linkage running down the center of the array field. If the installation field is not suitable in the shape of a rectangle, these systems are often employed in less than m configurations where fewer modules are controlled by the linkage. This is r cost increase factor for the prior art in many installations. The linear motion linkage of the prior art represents an excess of material and a labor-intensive installation cost component. The linkage must be robust in order to directly resist the force of an entire field of many rows of trackers to one large linear drive that must be affixed to a large separate linear actuator drive foundation. The separate, large foundation is necessary to anchor the drive ism and must resist very high forces induced by the wind to the entire tracker field. In addition, the flexibility in site layout is impacted by the linear motion linkage since the drive connection must lly run, centered in the rows, and be installed in a straight perpendicular line. The ical linkage of the prior art must be fixed at a right angle to the torsion tube and cannot deviate from perpendicular, ore, not allowing the system to conform to irregular installation site boundaries.

Tracking geometries other than the horizontal single axis require‘more land area for installation. In a field of trackers, all the tracker geometries except for the horizontal axis tracker must be spaced in two dimensions, East/West and South, so as not to shade each other. The horizontal axis tracker need only be spaced apart in the East/West dimension to alleviate shading and, therefore, requires much less land to implement. Land contour and shape also critically control the cost of the installation of most horizontal single axis tracker systems.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO 86079 Another type of horizontal axis tracker is not linked together and typically includes multiple PV modules mounted astride a torque tube. These are designed as independently motor driven rows. These horizontal trackers are driven individually by a motor/gear drive system and the PV array is rotated about the center of gravity of the PV module tracking system. Rotating the array about the center of gravity eliminates the moment loads applied to the gear drive by the overhung weight of the solar modules. In order to rotate the array about the center of y, this type of horizontal tracker design requires more structural material and more costly torque tube connections and gs than the present horizontal axis tracker embodiments. Other disadvantages of these r designs include a higher projected wind area that requires more structural material and large foundations to resist r moment loads and larger capacity drives to overcome moment loading from the solar modules that are mounted at a larger distance from the torque tube due to the taller profile of the array.

They also have more complex bearing and support points that rotate the PV modules about the center of gravity of the tracker, and use a motor per single tracker row, which equates to increased cost, maintenance, and decreased reliability.

A third tracker geometry is a tilted, single axis tracker. Often termed a tilt and roll tracker, it is tilted in ion and then rotates about that tilted axis. This type of tracker typically offers increased gain over a horizontal tracking system, but at an added cost that should be critically analyzed prior to deployment. These costs include the ement for more land due to the spacing necessary for shading in both the N/S and E/W dimensions and a more complex structure requiring more structural material because of increased projected height from foundation. These systems are also not capable of automatic stow during high winds since the elevation angle is fixed and therefore, must be urally capable of withstanding all wind forces. r tilted single axis ry is a fixed tilt azimuth tracker. A fixed tilt azimuth tracker is tilted in elevation and then rotates about a vertical axis. This design, although typically more structurally stable than a tilt and roll tracker, suffers from the same cost drawbacks as the tilt and roll design; although, the performance gain may make the tilted single axis geometry economic for some lations.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) The last tracking geometry is a dual-axis (D/A) tracker. D/A trackers provide the greatest performance gain over all the entioned tracking geometries since they keep the solar modules perpendicular to the sun in both axes. There are; however, several practical disadvantages of these s: more land is required due to spacing necessary for shading in two dimensions; a more complex structure is necessary that requires more structural material as a result of increased projected height from the earth and foundation; and a second drive axis for elevation is necessary, which increases complexity, expense, and maintenance issues. In addition, D/A systems typically use two drive motors per a relatively small surface area of solar modules that results in ses in both initial cost and subsequent nance costs. Some types of solar collectors, concentrating collectors for example, require D/A tracking to e.

As previously ted, an ideal solar tracking system will operate in all types of ions. This includes situations whereby a tracker’s movement is impeded by obstructions or the like. If there are no safeguards in place, permanent damage can result in the tracker system when an obstruction condition exists. In addition, human intervention may be necessary to cure the condition. mes, timely human intervention is ible if the trackers are in remote locations and secondly, sending out a technician for every obstruction condition can be very costly.

Another need in a solar tracker system is the ability to have flexibility in the design of the systems to support different lengths of driveshafts for differing terrain conditions and systems. Presently, the ation of specific length of driveshafts requires field welding and painting. A similar problem exists for torsion tubes. A design for ing a simple method to join torsion tube segments together in the field is necessary.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION (DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION) The presently claimed invention solves all of the problems listed above. An object of the presently claimed invention is to ically link multiple solar trackers in a large array configuration so that they operate in unison, driven by a single motor and r controller. The mechanical linkage system is favorably designed such that it must only SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) be capable of withstanding the relatively low forces required to effect movement of the trackers without the requirement to resist the larger forces induced from the wind that is applied to the array of trackers.

Another object of the presently claimed invention is to contain these al wind forces within the supports of each individual solar r so that no extra foundations or ments are necessary. A further object is to apply the drive principals to various solar single-axis tracking geometries to maximize the economic performance for each solar tracking application.

The mechanical drive system of the presently claimed invention advantageously links IO multiple single axis trackers er, moving many trackers h a simple and structurally minimal linkage to decrease cost and se long-term reliability. The uration of the mechanical linkage and gear drive assemblies allows the motor to move the linked trackers, yet eliminates the transmission of the external wind forces to the drive linkage. By exploiting the “one way” drive properties of the presently claimed invention, the mechanical linkage need only transmit the vely small forces necessary to move the tracker, and is not subject to the relatively high forces induced by the wind on the tracker. An added benefit of the system is that a relatively small motor can move a large area of solar modules.

The drive system of the presently claimed invention is applicable to all solar tracking geometries. The mechanical drive configuration results in a very reliable, flexible, low cost tracking method that is easy to install and maintain. The various embodiments of the presently claimed invention apply the drive system to the appropriate tracking ry in order to maximize the economic benefit of the ng system.

One aspect of the disclosed embodiments is to drive mechanically linked multiple rows of a horizontal S/A solar tracking collector assembly. Rows of solar modules are formed by affixing the solar modules to a general ntally positioned n tube having its long axis oriented in a North/South (N/S) direction. Each row includes one or more supports to the North and South of center and as well as the possible use of a center support. A bearing is affixed at each torsion tube support such that rotary SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) motion of the torsion tube may be affected through a single stage worm-gear drive ly or through a worm-drive gear assembly, which includes a second stage gear that is affixed to the torsion tube and one or more supports. A driven, rotating drive shaft is affixed to both sides of the rive assembly. The drive shaft may be positioned at right angles to the torsion tube and ed to each worm-gear drive to enable rotary motion of the torsion tube by ng rotary motion to the driVen drive shaft. Back g of the gearbox from wind forces applied to the system is virtually eliminated through the ties inherent in the design of the primary worm-drive gear assembly located at each tracker. The worm-drive gear assembly can be efficiently driven by the input of rotary motion from the drive shaft to the worm, but is very inefficient at transmitting rotary motion applied by the system on theworm-gear.

Therefore, moment forces, induced by the wind, applied to the solar array cannot be ively transmitted to the drive shaft linkage. The result is that the drive shaft does not need to resist the forces of the wind on the array and only transmits the driving force from the motor through a highly geared transmission system. This enables the drive shaft to be minimally constructed and allows for flexibility in its design and layout within the solar tracker array field.

A further embodiment of this aspect of the presently d ion is to incorporate articulating joints at the ends of each drive shaft to enable the tracker rows to vary in height and/or to translate in the MS direction. The articulated drive shaft adds flexibility in array field layout. Array fields using articulating drive shaft joints may be ucted on undulating or slanted terrain and may be tailored to irregular installation site boundaries. .The horizontal axis S/A tracker minimizes the required structural components, allows for a high—density ratio of installed modules to land area, and provides peak performance of a horizontal single axis solar tracking system through the use of a programmable backtracking scheme for early morning and late evening solar energy collection. in addition to minimizing the number and weight of structural components, the horizontal tracking system reduces on-site construction labor and installation requirements. It also provides a means for stowing the array of modules in the event of SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) a hurricane, typhoon, or other potentially destructive weather event. Another object of the horizontal tracker embodiment is that even as module costs considerably decline, it should remain competitive as ed with fixed-mounted arrays since it incorporates a minimal amount of structural material.

A second ment of the claimed invention is to drive multiple tilt and roll S/A solar trackers using the same drive principles as in the ntal tracking . In this embodiment, variations of the worm-drive gear system can be effectively used to drive multiple tilt and roll solar trackers in an array field using only one motor and controller.

Articulating joints on the drive shafts may also be incorporated’ to e the same flexibility as in the horizontal S/A tracker application.

A third embodiment of the presently d invention is to incorporate the drive system into a field application of multiple fixed tilt azimuth trackers. A specially designed vertical axis bearing may be designed into the support post of the tracker to place the gear drive connection close to the base of the tracker support in order to e clearance for the rotary drive linkage system underneath the solar module array. A more conventional bearing system, such as a slew drive may also be orated in the fixed tilt azimuth tracking ry if it is properly designed to withstand the load forces applied near the base of the array support. Another favorable application of the drive system is to incorporate the linked worm-gear drive into a carousel type fixed tilt azimuth ng array field. In this embodiment, the tilted solar array is rotated on a large area circular bearing to track the sun. The carousel tracker may also be constructed in a low profile design for rooftop applications.

The embodiments described in this application are intended to provide a cost effective, long life and low maintenance solution for implementing solar tracking of photovoltaic (PV) or other solar modules for solar energy ations. The presently claimed invention addresses the general problem of how best to mount and track PV modules in order to maximize the economic return from a system lation, while incorporating a similar drive system and principles for each tracking geometry. Since the presently d invention may be incorporated in various tracking geometries, it allows for SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) consideration of the balance between module efficiency as it relates to solar tracking geometries, land use, materials utilization, ion and maintenance costs, weather, climate, and installation cost. The current embodiment of the mechanically linked system is superior to the prior art because it eliminates the need for the drive system to resist the high load forces induced by the wind. Other benefits include the elimination of large te foundation(s) to mount the drive system, the linkage requires less material than the prior art, the linkage also allows for much greater flexibility in field ‘ layout of the trackers and a single motor can drive a much larger tracker field.

The drive system of the presently claimed invention allows the linkage to be configured two ways: 1) with rigid, connecting drive shafts for ment on even terrain or 2) with articulating or universal joints at the end of the drive shafts for use on uneven terrain or irregularly-shaped layouts. Both linkages may be ed within a single tracker system to install on a field consisting of a combination of even and uneven terrain or irregularly shaped installation sites.

The red system also has an adjustable limit for the driveline torque applied by the motor to the driveline. The system monitors the torque via clutch slippage or poWer to the motor, sensors that monitor the movement of the tracker or other methods of monitoring, to determine an event that obstructs the movement of the tracker. A remote location monitors the status of each r system and sends commands via a 2O communication system. Once the monitors or sensors detect an obstruction event, the system enters into an obstruction clearing mode 1 (OCM1), which is an adjustable high frequency series of attempts to move the obstructed tracker for an able ermined amount of time. If the tracker begins normal movement as one of the series of attempts, the system continues in a normal fashion. If the ction condition persists after the predetermined period of time, the system enters into an obstruction clearing mode 2 (OCMZ). This mode is an able lower frequency mode for an adjustable longer predetermined period of time. Again, if during this mode the tracker moves in a normal fashion, the system reverts to normal operation. if the obstructed condition persists after the OCM2, the remote location is advised and SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) 2014/033762 maintenance personnel can be sent to the location. The remote location, during this entire process receives information and may send commands to the tracker system.

The obstruction clearing and monitoring system may be designed to prevent over- torque damage to the driveline or other components and prevents breakers from tripping which involves a visit by maintenance personnel to reset the breaker. r feature in the claimed invention is a method and system for securely connecting a round torsion tube or driveshaft to driveline linkage, such as an lating joint, or to splice two ends of a round tube in a tracker system. The preferred system has a first end with an 8 shaped configuration and a second end with the same 8 shaped configuration; r, the second end is smaller to allow the second end to be inserted into the first end. In the valley of the 8 shape are keys that are bolted through the first end and second end to form a tight, concentric, keyed driveline connection. This method and system allows for inexpensive fabrication of varying length tubes in a factory and requires no field welding or preparation. The resultant connection is easy to assemble, is adjustable in length, provides for excellent concentricity, tightness, and the ability to transmit high torque loads without failure.

A second connection method and system are disclosed for a square tube or driveshaft uration. A coupler is provided with a spacer plate for insertion into a corner of the coupler. A first end of the square tube is inserted into coupler and spacer plate until it contacts a stop pin in the coupler. The second end is similarly ed. Push bolts are tightened into threaded apertures in the coupler, pushing spacer plate onto the first and second ends of the square tube. In addition, gouge bolts are tightened into additional threaded apertures, through the space plate and gouge into the first and second end.

This connection also avoids field welding and provides for a tight and efficient connection for all square tube splicing in tracker systems.

Other objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the tly claimed invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become nt to those d in the art upon examination of the following, or may be d by SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) 2014/033762 practice of the claimed invention. The objects and advantages of the claimed invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.

BRIEF PTION OF THE DRAWINGS The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate several embodiments of the presently claimed invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the ples of the claimed invention.

The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating preferred embodiments of the claimed invention and are not to be construed as limiting the claimed invention. The gs are included in the description below.

Fig. 1A shows the mechanically linked horizontal tracker embodiment with a worm-gear ly for driving a spur gear rack and another worm-gear assembly for driving a D- Ring chain drive.

Fig. 1B shows a worm-gear assembly for driving a cable drive.

Fig. 2 shows a direct drive horizontal tracker .

Fig. 3A shows the worm-gear assembly for the D-ring chain drive embodiment.

Fig. 3B shows the worm-gear assembly for the spur gear rack ly.

Fig. 4 shows the articulating joints.

Fig. 5 is an ion showing hydraulic dampeners installed on each tracker row to enable greater capacity per row.

Fig. 6 shows the mechanically linked worm-drive gearbox incorporated into a tilt and roll solar r.

Fig. 7 shows the mechanically linked worm-drive gearbox incorporated into a fixed tilt azimuth tracker.

Fig. 8A shows the rotating support tube assembly of Fig. 7.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Fig. BB shows a ear ly affixed to the vertical support of a fixed tilt h tracker.

Fig. 9 shows the mechanically linked worm-drive gearbox incorporated into a fixed tilt carousel solar tracker.

Fig. 10 is a flow chart showing the preferred adjustable limit embodiment for over torque conditions.

Fig. 11 shows an exploded view of the preferred connection for a circular or round shaft to a t end.

Fig. 12 shows the embodiment of Fig. 11 in a connected state.

Fig. 13 shows an exploded view of the preferred square tube coupler.

Fig. 14 shows the embodiment of Fig. 13 in a completed state.

Fig. 15 shows the preferred square tube coupler ing two square tubes.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS (BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION! IS The presently claimed invention has four tracker embodiments, a horizontal axis, a fixed tilt azimuth, tilt and roll, and a carousel tracker with the commonality of being linked er mechanically and operated by a rotary driven worm-drive system. All the tracker geometries incorporate a worm-gear primary drive, attached to the tracker frame, either directly, or through a secondary stage such as a spur gear rack, D-ring chain drive, or cable system mounted to one or two column supports for the tracker.

The sed embodiment allows many tracker rows to be driven by one drive motor through the mechanical drive shaft linkage, which does not need to resist the external forces applied to the array.

Horizontal Single Axis The mechanically linked horizontal, single axis embodiment of the presently claimed invention is a tracking ly 10 for pointing one or more solar panels or PV s 12 towards the sun, as shown in Fig. 1A. Drive mechanism 14, in this case a drive motor, provides the power to a drive shaft 28 and associated linkage to move PV SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) modules 12. The preferred driving mechanism 14 is a drive motor with a brake 15 for limiting motor run-on after rgizing and resisting motor coast and back forces. In the embodiment of Fig. 1A, drive mechanism 14 rotates drive shaft 28, which in turn drives ear assembly or drive box 26, as described below. In the embodiment shown in Fig. 1A, a drive ear assembly is erring the power to drive shaft 28. This assembly utilizes a rotating torsion tube 16, in this case, horizontal, in the North/South direction, on which PV modules 12 are mounted, using mounting methods well known in the art, such as U bolts 18, clamps or other well know module mounting. systems. Torsion tube 16 is inserted into bearings 20, with bearing surfaces such as no maintenance polymer bushings, which are attached to support columns 22. Drive mechanism or motor 14 drives a worm—gear drive box 26, which in turn, rotates the torsion tube 16 directly, as shown in Fig. 2, or drives a ary element, which in turn drives the torsion tube. In Fig. 1A, the secondary element is a spur gear rack 30 or D-ring chain drive 34, which is affixed to torsion tube 16. The ary element can also be a cable drive assembly or other drive assemblies well known in the art. (Not shown). Thus, when activated by drive mechanism 14 PV modules 12 are rotated. A second, third, etc. tracking assembly, similar to tracking assembly 10 can be connected to drive shaft 28, in this embodiment on shaft end 30, with a separate and similar worm assembly. This can be repeated for several tracking assemblies. Thus, one motor 14 can drive a plurality of tracking assemblies. ically linking the rs in a field reduces the system xity, operation and maintenance costs, and increases reliability.

Fig. 2 shows a direct drive horizontal r . In this embodiment, motor 14 directly drives worm-gear assemblies 26, which rotate torsion tubes 16. This provides rotation movement to PV s 12.

Figs. 3A and 3B show the worm-gear assemblies. One of the worm-gear assemblies 26 and 26’ are provided at each tracker location and are driven by drive shaft or by drive mechanism. Typically, this assembly contains worm 36 and worm-gear 38.

Worm 36 is affixed to drive shaft 28 by means well knoWn in the art. Fig. 3A shows worm-gear assembly 26 for driving a D-ring chain drive. Worm-gear 38 is affixed to SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) sprocket 41 for D-ring chain drive assembly 34. Fig. BB shows worm-gear assembly 26’ for driving spur gear rack assembly 30 by affixing drive gear 42 of spur gear rack assembly 30 to worm—gear 38. Any ation of worm-gear assemblies 26 and 26’ can be used in the four embodiments as described herein. Fig. 1B shows the worm— gear assembly 26” driving a cable drive 33.

With the mechanically linked worm-drive ly 26 and 26’ design, the site may be graded level to achieve the simplest installation. The mechanically linked design can also be deployed on an ungraded, slanted, or undulating terrain with the addition of articulating joints 40, such as swivel connections or universal joints in the drive shafts IO 28. Fig. 4 shows an embodiment of a r system for use on uneven terrain.

Articulating joints 40 sate for the non-linearity between the trackers in both the ntal and vertical direction to allow drive shaft 28 to connect to the next tracker without precision leveling and precise on of the next tracker in relation to the first tracker. Again, this articulating joint feature can be used with any of the embodiments disclosed herein.

If it is determined not to grade the site level, then only the columns for each single tracker row must be located with precision. Columns for subsequent trackers in a field may be located with little elevation nce relative to other tracker rows. Field site ation, such as grading, is then zed since the column height from tracker to tracker may be varied.

Referring again to Fig. 1A, support columns 22 are preferably ated from round steel galvanized tubing. In a ground based installation, multiple columns 22 are vertically attached to the earth in a straight line using a concrete foundation, columns driven into the ground, a screw type foundation or other foundation arrangement (not shown). For mounting to other structures such as a commercial rooftop or carport, columns 22 are attached to the structure support members (not . It may be desirable when mounting to another structure to use an A-Frame support design instead of a vertical tube column in order to distribute the forces over a greater area to the host structure (not shown).

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Torque tube 16, preferably square, may be inserted into polymer UHMW gs 20 designed to center the square torsion tube into the round g housing at the top of columns 22. This torque tube 16 may be comprised of several pieces joined together.

Thejoints may be formed by a swaged connection where one tube is formed with a smaller section to fit into the next tube (not shown). These joints may then be welded together to insure a secure connection (not shown). All welds should be cleaned and painted to avert corrosion.

Bearing assembly 20, preferably UHMW bearings, is installed on the top of the columns 22, which preferably is a set of tubes joined at ninety degrees (90°), forming a tee. The vertical portion of the tube may form a sleeve to mount over or inside of column 22.

This sleeve may be secured to the column with set bolts that burrow into the round , and may be further secured with a roll pin pressed into a hole in the two parts, or may simply be welded to the column. g assembly 20 may also be fabricated with a plate or plates that bolt to a vertical support (not shown).

Inside the horizontal tube of the bearing tee is an injection-molded polymer bearing, or the like, that has an inside shape conforming to torque tube 16, and a round outside diameter. This bearing may be made from a polymer material such as UHMW polyethylene with UV inhibitors and may be filled with a ant. This bearing may be formed by two separate pieces to facilitate installation into the tee housing.

Spur-gear rack 30, D-ring chain drive ly 34 or cable drive system (not shown), is connected to torque tube 16 preferably in the center of the tracker row. A circular gear or D-ring chain drive assembly 30 allows for a constant leverage point to resist wind-load forces applied to the array. Linear actuator driven s translate linear motion into rotary motion, and must resist higher loads due to the fact that the attachment of the actuator to the torque tube changes angle as a cosine function while the tracker rotates. This s in the linear actuator having to resist higher loads than a circular gear or chain drive . rive gearbox 26 is mounted to one or two of the center support columns 22 of the tracker, and coupled to a spur-gear rack, D-ring chain drive 30 or cable drive. Each tracker row worm-drive gearbox 26 is connected to SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) the next using rotating drive shafts 28. The design of ear drive 26 and linkage system eliminates the transfer of wind-load forces to the linkage. The worm-gear drive mechanism 26 resists the wind-load forces locally, within the tracker supports, at each tracker. This design incorporates a ng drive shaft—linked 28, worm-gear drive system 26 to rotate many trackers with one motor.

As shown in Fig. 5, ic dampeners 32 may be installed along the length of torque tube 16 at column locations 22, to decouple the structure from wind-induced forces.

Harmonic dampeners 32 increase the number of s that can be mounted onto a longer torque tube 16 without increasing the stiffness and cost of the supporting structure. Using dampeners 32 eliminates the need to se the size of torsion tube 16, while allowing more modules 12 to be d onto the same cross-section size tube 16. The result is that the center of gravity of the array remains close to bearings , which minimizes the ng weight loading to the drive system and spreads the cost of the gear drive over a larger tracker row size.

As shown in Figs. 1A and 2, a row of single solar modules 12 connects to a torsion tube 16 with a mounting apparatus 18 sing a module frame clamp, a module laminate connection or a module-mounting rail. Connection 18 to torque tube 16 may be made using a square bend U bolt or two bolts and a plate to form a clamp around torque tube 16 or module mounting rails. This arrangement forms a long row of solar modules 12 that rotate East and West as drive system 14 rotates torque tube 16. An important consideration is to minimize the over-hung rotational moment that the overhung weight of the modules creates. This may be accomplished by directly connecting the module frames to torque tube 16, or if necessary, using a module rail with a minimum depth, or offset, from the surface of torque tube 16.

Mechanical/y linked Ti/ted S/A r The mechanically linked tilt and roll, single axis 44 embodiment of the present ion is a tracking system for pointing one or more solar panels or PV modules 12 towards the sun, and is shown in Fig. 6. Drive mechanism (not shown) as previously described, provides the power and linkage to move PV modules 12 via drive shaft 28. Drive SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) mechanism utilizes a rotating torsion tube 16, in this case, tilted, in the South ion, orating mounting rails on which PV modules 12 are mounted. n tube 16 is inserted into the upper bearing 20, with bearing surfaces such as no nance polymer bushings, which is ed to the upper support columns 22. A combination thrust and radial bearing can be incorporated into worm-drive gearbox 26 to resist the downward and radial forces exerted on the array. As previously described, motor (not shown) drives a worm-gear drive box 26, which in turn, rotates the torsion tube 16 directly or drives a secondary element, which in turn drives the n tube. A spur gear rack or D-ring chain drive, as previously described can be affixed to torsion IO tube (not . Thus, when activated by drive mechanism, PV modules 12 are rotated. Thus, one motor can drive a plurality of drive mechanisms. The mechanically linked tilt and roll tracker 44 ts the same “one way” drive ism as the horizontal tracking system embodiment and thereby transmits only the forces necessary to rotate the PV array and the wind forces are resisted locally within each tracker array.

Mechanically Linked Fixed Tilt Azimuth Tracker The mechanically linked fixed tilt azimuth single axis tracker 50 embodiment of the presently claimed invention is shown in Fig. 7. This embodiment is also a tracking system for pointing one or more solar panels or PV modules 12 towards the sun. The preferred drive mechanism was previously described and is similar to the description.

Drive mechanism utilizes a rotating support tube assembly 52, in this case, vertical, and incorporating a structure with ng rails 54 on which PV modules 12 are mounted. As in the previous embodiments, a worm-gear assembly 56 is driven by drive shaft 28, which in turn rotates outer vertical tube 58 along with mounted PV modules 12. The rotating tube assembly 52 is shown in Fig. 8A. Outer vertical support tube 60 is inserted over top gs 62 that are affixed to the top and the ference of inner vertical support tube 64. Top bearing 62 preferably includes a thrust and radial bearing surface as achieved for example with a tapered roller bearing.

Drive motor (not shown), as previously described, drives worm-gear drive box 66, which in turn, rotates the torsion tube 68 directly or drives a secondary element which SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) in turn drives the torsion tube (not shown). A spur gear rack or D-ring chain drive can also be affixed to torsion tube 68, as previously described. To more clearly shown the drive mechanism for this embodiment, Fig 8B shows a close up view of worm 70 driving ar ear 72, causing outer vertical support tube 60 to rotate. Thus, when activated by drive mechanism PV modules 12 are d. Another design of the fixed tilt azimuth tracker incorporates a slew drive bearing and worm-drive mechanism to rotate and support the PV array. The gear drive is located sufficiently low on the support structure so that the rotating linkage does not interfere with the PV modules as they rotate. For a mechanical linkage as shown in Fig. 7, drive shaft 28 is driven by a IO motor through a worm-gear drive box 56, which in turn is affixed to a second drive mechanism for concurrently rotating a second set of PV modules 12. Thus, one motor 24 can drive a plurality of drive mechanisms. The ically linked fixed tilt azimuth tracker exploits the same “one way" drive mechanism as the horizontal tracking system embodiment thereby resisting the wind forces y within each tracked array.

Mechanically Linked el Azimuth Tracker The mechanically linked carousel azimuth tracker is shown in Fig. 9. The mechanically linked carousel azimuth single axis tracker embodiment of the presently claimed invention is also a tracking system for pointing one or more solar panels or PV modules 12 towards the sun. Drive mechanism, previously described, provides the power and linkage to move PV modules 12 for each carousel tracker assembly 70. In this embodiment, each el tracker assembly 70 is rotated in , as shown. Drive mechanism provides the power and linkage to move PV modules via drive shaft 28.

Drive mechanism es a mechanically linked worm-drive gearbox 72 in conjunction with a large diameter, bearing ring 74 on which PV array 12 rotates. Worm-drive gearbox 72 rotates large diameter ring 74 through the uses of a secondary assembly such as a rack and pinion gear, chain drive or cable drive system (not shown).

Rotating drive shaft 28 rotates the worm, which in turn rotates the worm-gear, which then rotates a spur gear, pulley or chain sprocket, which rotates large diameter bearing ring 74. The g incorporates both radial and thrust g surfaces. These bearing surfaces may be constructed of polymer gs, or ed rollers. PV SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) array 12 of carousel tracker 70 may also be configured in a low profile to minimize wind loads and may be suitable for use on p applications. Carousel tracker 70 exploits the same mechanically linked “one way" drive mechanism as the horizontal tracking system embodiment and thereby allowing many trackers to be driven by one motor.

The external wind forces on the rs are ed locally within each tracked array.

Tracker Controller The microprocessor tracker control system may incorporate a global positioning system (GPS) to obtain location and time information and to tically update and compensate for the internal clock drift of the electronics. Time, date, and location information will be used by the microprocessor controller to calculate the solar position and move the tracking system to maximize the exposure of the modules to the sun.

The solar tracking thms are well known and published. The system may also have external inputs such as a wind speed monitor to enable the trackers to be tically feathered in the event of a severe windstorm. The control system may include a manual override function to manually late the r position for installation or maintenance. This control system may also incorporate diagnostics, such as tracker functionality and/or array output monitoring.

The control system interacts with the motorized n of the drive system and the data collection system. The gear~drive assembly will incorporate a position feedback mechanism, preferably digital, to allow the microprocessor to move the tracker into a desired position and keep track of whether the tracker is functioning properly. The motorized assembly incorporates an end of travel indicator that will allow the rocessor to know that it is in the “end” position assuring that the motor will not drive the trackers. past their mechanical limits, and ng the position of the r to reset itself once per day to avoid accumulation of position error. The motor should incorporate a means of dynamic overload protection. If the tracker fails to move due to mechanical failure or motor overload, the control system should be capable of detecting the malfunction, stop the operation, and record or transmit the information.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Many of the zed tracker drives may be connected to a single controller in either a wired or wireless network configuration. Multiple master controllers in a large solar field configuration may be networked together. The control system may record and communicate current tracker positions. it may also record and communicate faults in the tracker system to a supervisory control system. Other enhancements to the control system may include PV output monitoring on each tracker. Since the entire module output falls to near zero if it is partially shaded, it is necessary to incorporate a back- ng scheme, which will rotate the modules in the opposite direction of the sun, in order to eliminate one tracker from shading r in the early g and evening, as the sun is close to the horizon. The back-tracking scenario may be calculated from the sun angle, the height of the array, and the spacing between rs. Individual rs may back-track at different rates based upon the mounting height of the trackers in relation to the adjoining trackers.

For smaller installations where fewer trackers are installed, a simpler optical, closed loop tracking system can be used instead of the open loop microprocessor control as described above.

Fig. 10 is a flow chart that shows the preferred method of incorporating an adjustable limit to the driveline torque that can be applied by the motor to a driveline. In most tracker systems, when a tracker is impeded by an obstacle, or heavy snow load or the like, the circuit breaker for the motor is tripped causing a person to go out to the stuck tracker to reset the t breaker even if the obstacle is removed or the stuck condition goes away. For example, if a heavy snow has fallen and temporarily impedes the nt of the tracker. The presently claimed invention provides a system to temporarily remove power to the motor for a predetermined amount of time and to then provide power to the motor again once the impeded condition is cleared or to continue to prevent power to the motor if the condition continues after at least one reset cycle.

The determination of the amount of ine torque or lack of movement of the tracker can be accomplished in several methods. Clutch slippage can be determined, a sensor can be mounted on the tracker to sense nt, the amount of power used by the motor canbe monitored for a predetermined level or any other r method can be SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) employed, each of these methods, collectively defined, as sensing movement of the r assembly.

Referring to Figs. 1 and 10, the preferred system and method first calculates a position 150 in a programmable logic control (PLC) 152, as performed in most tracker systems.

The system then sends a prompt to move the tracker 154, if necessary. If the tracker is in a correct position and does not need to be moved 156 the system reverts to calculate position 150 mode. This information is conveyed to a remote Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition ) 180, via an onboard controller 17. SCADA 180 es communication to and from one or more tracker systems via typical communication networks 19. If the r es movement 158, a prompt is sent to tracker motor 14 to move the tracker. Tracker position ck 160 is provided from tracker motor 14 and a determination as to whether the tracker is moving 162, via a movement sensor 21. If the tracker is moving 164, the system is operating normally and the system feeds back to calculate position 150 mode. if the tracker is not moving 166, the system enters into obstruction clearing mode 1 (OCM1) 168 and PLC 152 sends a signal to SCADA 180. OCM1 168 is typically a high frequency t to move the tracker for a predetermined amount of time by prompting 170 tracker motor 14 and sending a signal to calculate position 150. For example, this can be once per minute for a thirty minute period of time. The frequency and the time period are fully adjustable by a user. OCM1 168 is typically ient to compensate for a momentary wind event or a temporary obstruction. If the tracker moves as instructed during the OCM1period, the tracker is operating in a normal fashion again and reported 172 to SCADA 180 and to calculate position 150.

After the ermined amount of time is exhausted in OCM1 168 mode and there is still a no movement condition, a prompt 174 is provided and the system enters an ction clearing mode 2 (OCM2) 176 via a message from SCADA 180. OCM2 176 is typically a lower frequency attempt to move the tracker, for example once every twenty s, for a longer period of time, for example two weeks. Again, the frequency and time period are fully adjustable by the user. OCM2 176 is designed for longer term obstruction events, such as a lingering snow storm. If during OCM2 176 SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) time period, the tracker begins movement, this is reported 178 to SCADA 180 and to calculate position 150 and the system operates in a normal fashion. If after the OCM2 time period and no movement of the tracker are measured, the system ceases all movement attempts and reports to SCADA 180 that a malfunction condition exists and maintenance crew can be dispatched to the site.

The state of the art presently requires welded terminations or s which are very costly and ible for drive-shafts. A welded termination is typically used by welding the end to a driveline yoke or the like. Round tubing is the most efficient and requires the least al for uction for transmitting torque. Figs. 11 and 12 show the preferred embodiment for a coupler for round tubes or a tor to the driveline linkage, such as u-joints as shown in the figures. As shown in Fig. 11, coupler 100 is formed on round shaft 110. Coupler 100 has an 8 shaped end 112 with opposing indented grooves 114, which are semicircular and located in the center of 8 shaped ends 112. One or more coupler apertures 118 are drilled through opposing indented grooves 114, as shown. lndented s 114 are configured to accept half round shaped compression keys 116. Compression keys 116 have complimentary key apertures 120 that correspond to coupler apertures 118 for insertion of coupler bolts 122, coupler washers 124, coupler lock s 128, and r nuts 126.

Component end 130 has a similar 8 shaped component end 132 that is red to be ed inside of 8 shaped end 112 within an optimized tolerance. Inside component indented grooves 134 is an elongated slot 136 for accepting bolts 122 and to make the connection adjustable. Fig. 12 shows the connection n coupler 100 and component end 130 with bolts 122 inserted through opposing compression keys 116, coupler apertures 118, elongated slot 136 and tightened coupler nuts 126. The structural elements and compression method for coupling round shaft 110 to component 138 provides for an easy system for ing a robust connection. This also provides for a tight, concentric and keyed driveline connection that is inexpensive to fabricate and will accommodate varying length drive-shafts in the factory and does not require field welding or painting. The resulting connection is easy to assemble, is SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) adjustable in length and has excellent concentricity, tightness, and the ability to transmit high torque loads.

Figs. 13, 14, and 15 show the preferred coupler for a square torsion tube or driveline.

Coupler 200 is a square tube with an internal ion larger than a torsion tube 202 or square driveline. Fig. 13 is an exploded view of coupler 200. Fig. 14 shows coupler 200 as led and Fig. 15 shows coupler 200 splicing opposing torsion tubes 202.

Coupler 200 comprises housing 204 with a length 206 sufficient to hold both ends of torsion tube 202 in a stable position and to align two opposing torsion tubes 202. red coupler 200 has a spacer plate 208 which is an angled structure configured to be sandwiched between housing 204 and torsion tubes 202 when torsion tubes 202 are inserted into housing 204. Spacer plate 208 is used for r stability and alignment of opposing torsion tubes 202. Spacer plate 208 has two through bolt apertures 210 and a stop pin aperture 212 located substantially in the center of spacer plate 208. Housing 204 has two threaded pressing apertures 214 with pressing bolts 216 for pressing against spacer plate 208 when pressing bolts 216 are tightened, thus, pressing spacer plate 208 against opposing n tubes 202. g 204 also has two threaded gouging apertures 218 and two gouging bolts 220 that are tightened into threaded gouging apertures 218. Gouging apertures 218 are substantially aligned with through bolt apertures 210 to allow gouging bolts 220 to contact or gouge into torsion tubes 202 when tightened. Housing 204 ably has a stop pin 222, which can be a rivet, bolt or pin, affixed to a center of housing 204 to serve as a stop for insertion of torsion tubes 202 into housing 204. Although, this disclosure and the drawings show two threaded gouging apertures 218 and two threaded pressing apertures 214 with ponding bolts, this disclosure is intended to cover any number of them, thus the number can be increased or decreased depending on the application.

Although this description referred to PV modules, the tly d ion can also be used to track solar heat collectors, building shade systems, sunlight exposure testing of materials, and other systems that require tracking of the sun.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) Although the claimed invention has been described in detail with ular reference to these preferred ments, other embodiments can achieve the same results.

Variations and modifications of the presently claimed ion will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above, are hereby incorporated by reference.

SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)

Claims (11)

1. A method of adjusting a duration and frequency of obstruction clearing modes to a motor of a linked r system for driving a plurality of individual solar r 5 lies with the motor, the method comprising the steps of providing a communication system between an onboard controller on each tracker assembly and a remote supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA); g a prompt to the motor to move the tracker assemblies towards the sun; sensing whether the tracker assemblies are moving towards the sun; 10 entering into a first obstruction clearing mode 1 (OCM1), if the tracker assemblies are not moving towards the light , the OCM1 comprising an OCM1 time period for an impeded condition of the tracker assembly to clear, wherein the OCM1 comprises an adjustable high frequency series of independent prompts to the tracker assemblies to move towards the sun; 15 entering into an obstruction clearing mode 2 (OCM2), if the tracker assemblies are not moving after an OCM1 time period, the OCM2 comprising an OCM2 time period for the impeded condition of the tracker assembly to clear, wherein the OCM2 ses an able low frequency series of independent prompts to the tracker assemblies to move towards the sun; and 20 ceasing movement attempts if the tracker assemblies are not moving towards the sun after an OCM2 time period.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing a communication system comprises remotely monitoring the movement, prompting movement of the r 25 assemblies and commanding the tracker assemblies to enter the OCM1 or OCM2 modes.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of monitoring movement of the tracker assemblies comprises a member from the group consisting of measuring clutch 30 ge, a movement sensor and ing power consumed by the motor.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising entering into a normal mode if the tracker assemblies move correctly during the OCM1 or OCM2 modes.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of notifying maintenance personnel of a malfunction ion after the OCM2 time .

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising removing power to the motor in 5 between attempts to move the r assemblies during the OCM1 mode and OCM2 mode.

7. A system for adjusting the duration and frequency of ction ng modes to a motor of a linked tracker system for driving a plurality of individual solar tracker 10 assemblies with the motor, comprising a remote isory l and data acquisition, SCADA, configured to command and communicate with a programmable logic control, PLC; a communication system between the PLC on each tracker assembly and the SCADA; 15 a command sent by SCADA to the PLC to prompt the motor to move the tracker assemblies; a sensor configured to sense whether the tracker assemblies are moving towards the sun; the PLC configured to enter into a first obstruction clearing mode, OCM1, if the 20 tracker assemblies are not moving towards the sun, the OCM1 comprising an OCM1 time period for an impeded condition of the tracker to clear, wherein the OCM1 comprises an adjustable high frequency series of independent prompts to the tracker assemblies to move towards the sun, via command from the SCADA; the PLC further configured to enter into a second obstruction clearing mode, 25 OCM2, if the tracker assemblies are not moving after the OCM1 time period, the OCM2 comprising an OCM2 time period for the impeded condition of the tracker assembly to clear, wherein the OCM2 comprises an adjustable low frequency series of independent prompts to the tracker assemblies to move towards the sun, via command from the SCADA; and 30 the PLC further configured to cease movement attempts if the tracker assemblies are not moving towards the light source after an OCM2 time , via command from the SCADA.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the SCADA is configured to remotely monitor the nt of the tracker assemblies.

9. The system of claim 7 wherein the sensor for monitoring movement of the 5 tracker assemblies comprises a member from the group consisting of a sensor for measuring clutch slippage, a movement sensor and a sensor for ing power consumed by the motor.

10. The system of claim 7 further comprises the PLC being configured to enter into 10 a normal mode if the tracker assemblies move correctly during the OCM1 or OCM2 modes.

11. The system of claim 7 further comprises the SCADA being ured to notify maintenance personnel of a malfunction condition after the OCM2 time period. WO 86079 ~