NZ613736B2 - Synergistic herbicidal composition containing penoxsulam and glyphosate - Google Patents

Abstract

The disclosure relates to a synergistic mixture of penoxsulam and glyphosate for controlling weeds in crops, especially vines, range and pasture, industrial vegetation management, rights of way and in any glyphosate tolerant crop, wherein the weight ratio of glyphosate to penoxsulam is from 4:1 to 448:1. 48:1.

Description

W0 2012/106566 SYNERGISTIC HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING PENOXSULAM AND GLYPHOSATE This invention concerns a synergistic idal composition containing (a) penoxsulam and (b) sate for controlling the growth of undesirable vegetation, ally in vines, range and pasture, industrial vegetation management, rights of way and in any glyphosate tolerant crop. These compositions are disclosed as providing improved post- emergence herbicidal weed control.

The protection of crops from weeds and other vegetation which inhibit crop growth is a constantly recurring problem in agriculture. To help combat this problem, researchers in the field of synthetic chemistry have produced an extensive variety of chemicals and chemical formulations effective in the control of such unwanted growth. Chemical ides of many types have been disclosed in the literature and a large number are in commercial use.

In some cases, herbicidal active ingredients have been shown to be more effective in combination than when applied individually and this is referred to as “synergism.” As described in the Herbicide ok of the Weed Science Society of America, Ninth Edition, 2007, p. 429 “‘synergism’ [is] an ction of two or more factors such that the effect when combined is greater than the predicted effect based on the response to each factor applied separately.” The present invention is based on the discovery that penoxsulam and glyphosate, already known individually for their herbicidal cy, display a synergistic effect when d in ation.

The present invention concerns a synergistic herbicidal mixture comprising an herbicidally effective amount of (a) penoxsulam and (b) glyphosate. The compositions may also contain an agriculturally acceptable adjuvant and/or carrier.

The present invention also concerns herbicidal compositions for and s of controlling the growth of undesirable vegetation, particularly in range and pasture, industrial vegetation management, rights of way and in any glyphosate nt crop, and the use of these synergistic compositions.

W0 06566 The species spectra of penoxsulam and glyphosate, i.e., the weed species which the respective compounds control, are broad and highly complementary. It has now been found that a combination of penoxsulam and glyphosate exhibits a istic action in the control broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla, BRAPP), yellow nutsedge (Cypems esculentus, CYPES), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli, ECHCG), momingglory (Ipomoea, hederacea, IPOHE), Chinese sprangletop (Leptochloa chinensis, LEFCH) ryegrass (Lolium spp, LOLSS), scented mayweed (Matricaria chamomilla, MATCH), and annual bluegrass (Poa annua, POAAN) at application rates equal to or lower than the rates of the individual compounds.

Penoxsulam is the common name for 2-(2,2-difluoroethoxy)-N—(5,8-dimethoxy- [l,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidinyl)(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide. Its herbicidal activity is described in The Pesticide , Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Penoxsulam controls Echinochloa spp., as well as many broadleaf, sedge and aquatic weeds in rice, and Apera spp. grass in cereals, as well as many broadleaf weeds in aquatics, many cereal crops, range and pasture, IVM and turf. sate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine is a EPSP synthase tor. Its herbicidal ty is bed in The Pesticide Manual, Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Glyphosate provides non-selective post-emergence weed control.

The term herbicide is used herein to mean an active ingredient that kills, controls or otherwise adversely modifies the growth of . An idally effective or vegetation- controlling amount is an amount of active ient which causes an adversely modifying effect and includes deviations from natural development, killing, regulation, desiccation, retardation, and the like. The terms plants and vegetation include germinant seeds, emerging seedlings, plants emerging from tive ules, and established vegetation.

Herbicidal activity is exhibited by the nds of the synergistic mixture when they are applied directly to the plant or to the locus of the plant at any stage of growth. The effect observed depends upon the plant species to be controlled, the stage of growth of the plant, the application parameters of dilution and spray drop size, the particle size of solid components, the environmental conditions at the time of use, the specific compound employed, the specific adjuvants and carriers employed, the soil type, and the like, as well as the amount of chemical applied. These and other factors can be adjusted as is known in the W0 06566 art to promote non-selective or selective herbicidal action. Generally, it is preferred to apply the ition of the present invention postemergence to relatively immature undesirable vegetation to achieve the maximum control of weeds.

In the composition of this ion, the weight ratio of glyphosate to penoxsulam at which the herbicidal effect is synergistic lies within the range from 3:2 to 896:1, preferably from 4:1 to 448:1. The rate at which the synergistic composition is applied will depend upon the particular type of weed to be controlled, the degree of control required, and the timing and method of application. In general, the ition of the invention can be applied at an application rate from 112.5 grams of active ingredient per e (gai/ha) to 2310 gai/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition. Penoxsulam is applied at a rate from 2.5 g/ha to 70 g/ha and glyphosate is applied at a rate from 110 g/ha to 2240 g/ha.

The components of the synergistic mixture of the present invention can be applied either separately or as part of a multipart idal system.

The synergistic mixture of the present invention can be applied in conjunction with one or more other herbicides to control a wider variety of undesirable vegetation. When used in conjunction with other herbicides, the composition can be formulated with the other herbicide or herbicides, tank-mixed with the other herbicide or herbicides or applied sequentially with the other herbicide or herbicides. Some of the herbicides that can be employed in conjunction with the synergistic composition of the present invention include: 4- CPA; 4-CPB; 4-CPP; 2,4-D; 3,4-DA; 2,4-DB; 3,4-DB; 2,4-DEB; 2,4-DEP; 3,4-DP; 2,3,6- TBA; 2,4,5-T; 2,4,5-TB; acetochlor, acifluorfen, aclonifen, acrolein, alachlor, chlor, alloxydim, allyl alcohol, alorac, ametridione, ametryn, amibuzin, bazone, amidosulfuron, aminocyclopyrachlor, aminopyralid, amiprofos-methyl, amitrole, ammonium sulfamate, anilofos, on, asulam, atraton, atrazine, azafenidin, azimsulfuron, aziprotryne, barban, BCPC, beflubutamid, benazolin, bencarbazone, benfluralin, benfuresate, bensulfuron, bensulide, bentazone, benzadox, benzfendizone, benzipram, benzobicyclon, benzofenap, benzofluor, benzoylprop, benzthiazuron, bicyclopyrone, x, bilanafos, bispyribac, borax, bromacil, bromobonil, bromobutide, bromofenoxim, bromoxynil, brompyrazon, butachlor, nacil, fos, butenachlor, buthidazole, buthiuron, butralin, ydim, n, butylate, cacodylic acid, trole, calcium chlorate, calcium ide, cambendichlor, carbasulam, carbetamide, carboxazole chlorprocarb, carfentrazone, CDEA, W0 2012/106566 CEPC, thoxyfen, chloramben, chloranocryl, chlorazifop, chlorazine, chlorbromuron, chlorbufam, chloreturon, chlorfenac, chlorfenprop, chlorflurazole, chlorflurenol, chloridazon, chlorimuron, chlomitrofen, chloropon, chlorotoluron, xuron, chloroxynil, chlorpropham, chlorsulfuron, chlorthal, chlorthiamid, cinidon-ethyl, cinmethylin, cinosulfuron, cisanilide, dim, cliodinate, clodinafop, clofop, clomazone, clomeprop, p, cloproxydim, clopyralid, cloransulam, CMA, copper sulfate, CPMF, CPPC, credazine, cresol, cumyluron, ryn, cyanazine, cycloate, cyclosulfamuron, cycloxydim, cycluron, cyhalofop, cyperquat, cyprazine, cyprazole, cypromid, daimuron, dalapon, dazomet, delachlor, desmedipham, desmetryn, di-allate, dicamba, dichlobenil, ralurea, dichlormate, dichlorprop, dichlorprop—P, diclofop, diclosulam, diethamquat, diethatyl, difenopenten, difenoxuron, difenzoquat, diflufenican, diflufenzopyr, dimefuron, dimepiperate, achlor, dimethametryn, dimethenamid, dimethenamid-P, no, zon, dinitramine, dinofenate, dinoprop, dinosam, dinoseb, rb, diphenamid, dipropetryn, diquat, disul, dithiopyr, diuron, DMPA, DNOC, DSMA, EBEP, eglinazine, endothal, epronaz, EPTC, erbon, esprocarb, ethalfluralin, ethametsulfuron, muron, ethiolate, ethofumesate, ethoxyfen, ethoxysulfuron, etinofen, etnipromid, etobenzanid, EXD, fenasulam, fenoprop, fenoxaprop, prop—P, fenoxasulfone, fenteracol, fenthiaprop, fentrazamide, fenuron, ferrous sulfate, flamprop, flamprop—M, flazasulfuron, lam, fluazifop, fluazifop-P, fluazolate, flucarbazone, flucetosulfuron, fluchloralin, cet, flufenican, flufenpyr, ulam, n, flumiclorac, flumioxazin, flumipropyn, fluometuron, fluorodifen, fluoroglycofen, fluoromidine, fluoronitrofen, fluothiuron, flupoxam, flupropacil, flupropanate, flupyrsulfuron, fluridone, flurochloridone, fluroxypyr, flurtamone, fluthiacet, fomesafen, foramsulfuron, fosamine, furyloxyfen, glufosinate, glufosinate-P, fen, halosulfuron, haloxydine, haloxyfop, haloxyfop—P, hexachloroacetone, hexaflurate, hexazinone, imazamethabenz, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr, imazaquin, imazethapyr, imazosulfuron, indanofan, indaziflam, iodobonil, iodomethane, iodosulfuron, ioxynil, ipazine, ipfencarbazone, iprymidam, isocarbamid, isocil, isomethiozin, isonoruron, isopolinate, palin, isoproturon, isouron, en, isoxachlortole, isoxaflutole, isoxapyrifop, ilate, ketospiradox, lactofen, lenacil, linuron, MAA, MAMA, MCPA, MCPA-thioethyl, MCPB, mecoprop, mecoprop-P, terb, mefenacet, mefluidide, mesoprazine, mesosulfuron, mesotrione, metam, metamifop, metamitron, metazachlor, metazosulfuron, metflurazon, methabenzthiazuron, methalpropalin, methazole, methiobencarb, methiozolin, methiuron, methometon, methoprotryne, methyl bromide, methyl isothiocyanate, methyldymron, metobenzuron, omuron, metolachlor, W0 2012/106566 metosulam, metoxuron, metribuzin, metsulfuron, molinate, monalide, monisouron, monochloroacetic acid, monolinuron, monuron, morfamquat, MSMA, naproanilide, napropamide, am, neburon, nicosulfuron, nipyraclofen, nitralin, nitrofen, nitrofluorfen, norflurazon, noruron, OCH, orbencarb, ortho-dichlorobenzene, orthosulfamuron, in, oxadiargyl, oxadiazon, oxapyrazon, oxasulfuron, oxaziclomefone, oxyfluorfen, parafluron, paraquat, pebulate, pelargonic acid, pendimethalin, pentachlorophenol, ochlor, pentoxazone, done, pethoxamid, phenisopham, phenmedipham, phenmedipham-ethyl, phenobenzuron, phenylmercury acetate, picloram, nafen, pinoxaden, piperophos, potassium arsenite, ium azide, potassium cyanate, pretilachlor, primisulfuron, procyazine, prodiamine, profluazol, profluralin, profoxydim, proglinazine, prometon, prometryn, propachlor, propanil, propaquizafop, propazine, propham, propisochlor, propoxycarbazone, propyrisulfuron, propyzamide, prosulfalin, prosulfocarb, prosulfuron, proxan, prynachlor, pydanon, pyraclonil, pyraflufen, pyrasulfotole, pyrazolynate, pyrazosulfuron, pyrazoxyfen, pyribenzoxim, pyributicarb, pyriclor, pyridafol, pyridate, pyriftalid, pyriminobac, pyrimisulfan, pyrithiobac, pyroxasulfone, pyroxsulam, quinclorac, rac, quinoclamine, quinonamid, quizalofop, ofop-P, rhodethanil, rimsulfuron, saflufenacil, S-metolachlor, sebuthylazine, secbumeton, sethoxydim, siduron, simazine, simeton, yn, SMA, sodium arsenite, sodium azide, sodium chlorate, rione, sulfallate, trazone, sulfometuron, sulfosulfuron, sulfuric acid, sulglycapin, swep, TCA, tebutam, tebuthiuron, tefuryltrione, tembotrione, tepraloxydim, terbacil, terbucarb, terbuchlor, terbumeton, terbuthylazine, ryn, tetrafluron, thenylchlor, thiazafluron, thiazopyr, thidiazimin, thidiazuron, thiencarbazone-methyl, thifensulfuron, thiobencarb, tiocarbazil, rim, topramezone, tralkoxydim, triafamone, tri-allate, triasulfuron, triaziflam, tribenuron, tricamba, triclopyr, hane, trietazine, trifloxysulfuron, trifluralin, triflusulfuron, trifop, trifopsime, roxytriazine, trimeturon, tripropindan, tritac tritosulfuron, ate, xylachlor and salts, , optically active isomers and mixtures thereof.

The synergistic composition of the present invention can, further, be used in conjunction with glufosinate, a, imidazolinones, sulfonylureas, or 2,4-D on glyphosate-tolerant, glufosinate-tolerant, dicamba-tolerant, imidazolinone-tolerant, sulfonylurea-tolerant and tolerant crops. It is generally preferred to use the synergistic composition of the present invention in combination with herbicides that are selective for the crop being treated and which complement the spectrum of weeds controlled by these W0 2012/106566 compounds at the ation rate employed. It is r generally preferred to apply the synergistic composition of the present invention and other mentary herbicides at the same time, either as a combination formulation or as a tank mix.

The synergistic composition of the present invention can generally be employed in combination with known herbicide safeners, such as benoxacor, benthiocarb, brassinolide, cloquintocet ), cyometrinil, daimuron, dichlormid, dicyclonon, dimepiperate, disulfoton, fenchlorazole-ethyl, fenclorim, flurazole, fluxofenim, furilazole, harpin proteins, isoxadifen-ethyl, mefenpyr-diethyl, MG 191, MON 4660, naphthalic anhydride (NA), oxabetrinil, R29148 and N—phenyl-sulfonylbenzoic acid amides, to enhance their selectivity.

In practice, it is preferable to use the synergistic composition of the present invention in es containing an herbicidally effective amount of the herbicidal components along with at least one agriculturally acceptable adjuvant or r. Suitable adjuvants or carriers should not be phytotoxic to valuable crops, particularly at the concentrations employed in applying the compositions for selective weed control in the presence of crops, and should not react chemically with herbicidal components or other composition ingredients. Such mixtures can be designed for application ly to weeds or their locus or can be concentrates or formulations that are normally diluted with onal carriers and adjuvants before application. They can be solids, such as, for example, dusts, granules, water- dispersible granules, or wettable powders, or liquids, such as, for example, emulsifiable concentrates, solutions, ons or suspensions.

Suitable agricultural adjuvants and carriers that are useful in preparing the herbicidal mixtures of the invention are well known to those d in the art. Some of these adjuvants include, but are not limited to, crop oil concentrate (mineral oil (85%) + emulsifiers (15%)); henol late; benzylcocoalkyldimethyl nary ammonium salt; blend of petroleum arbon, alkyl esters, organic acid, and c surfactant; C9-C1] alkylpolyglycoside; phosphated alcohol ethoxylate; natural primary alcohol (Cm—C16) ethoxylate; di-sec-butylphenol EO-PO block copolymer; polysiloxane-methyl cap; nonylphenol ethoxylate + urea ammonium nitrate; emulsified methylated seed oil; tridecyl alcohol (synthetic) ethoxylate (8E0); tallow amine ethoxylate (15 E0); PEG(400) dioleate- 99.

Liquid carriers that can be employed include water, toluene, xylene, petroleum naphtha, crop oil, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexanone, trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, ethyl acetate, amyl acetate, butyl acetate, propylene glycol monomethyl ether and diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, amyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerine, N—methyl pyrrolidinone, N,N—dimethyl alkylamides, dimethyl sulfoxide, liquid fertilizers and the like.

Water is generally the carrier of choice for the on of concentrates.

Suitable solid carriers include talc, pyrophyllite clay, silica, attapulgus clay, kaolin clay, kieselguhr, chalk, diatomaceous earth, lime, calcium carbonate, bentonite clay, Fuller's earth, cottonseed hulls, wheat flour, soybean flour, pumice, wood flour, walnut shell flour, lignin, and the like.

It is usually desirable to incorporate one or more surface-active agents into the compositions of the present invention. Such surface-active agents are advantageously ed in both solid and liquid compositions, especially those designed to be diluted with carrier before ation. The surface-active agents can be anionic, cationic or nonionic in character and can be employed as emulsifying agents, wetting agents, suspending agents, or for other purposes. Surfactants conventionally used in the art of formulation and which may also be used in the present formulations are described, inter alia, in “McCutcheon’s ents and Emulsifiers Annual,” MC Publishing Corp., ood, New Jersey, 1998 and in “Encyclopedia of tants,” Vol. I-III, Chemical Publishing Co., New York, 1980- 81. Typical surface-active agents include salts of alkyl es, such as diethanolammonium lauryl sulfate; alkylarylsulfonate salts, such as calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate; alkylphenol-alkylene oxide addition ts, such as nonylphenol-Clg ethoxylate; alcohol-alkylene oxide addition products, such as tridecyl alcohol-C16 late; soaps, such as sodium stearate; alkylnaphthalene-sulfonate salts, such as sodium dibutyl- naphthalenesulfonate; l esters of sulfosuccinate salts, such as sodium di(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate; sorbitol , such as sorbitol oleate; quaternary amines, such as lauryl trimethylammonium chloride; polyethylene glycol esters of fatty acids, such as polyethylene glycol stearate; block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide; salts of mono- and dialkyl phosphate ; vegetable or seed oils such as soybean oil, rapeseed/canola oil, olive oil, castor oil, er seed oil, t oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, linseed oil, palm oil, W0 2012/106566 peanut oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, tung oil and the like; and esters of the above vegetable oils, particularly methyl esters.

Oftentimes, some of these materials, such as vegetable or seed oils and their , can be used hangeably as an agricultural nt, as a liquid carrier or as a surface active agent.

Other ves commonly used in agricultural compositions include compatibilizing agents, antifoam agents, sequestering agents, lizing agents and buffers, corrosion inhibitors, dyes, odorants, spreading agents, penetration aids, sticking agents, sing agents, thickening agents, freezing point depressants, antimicrobial agents, and the like. The compositions may also contain other ible components, for example, other herbicides, plant growth regulants, fungicides, insecticides, and the like and can be formulated with liquid fertilizers or solid, particulate fertilizer carriers such as ammonium nitrate, urea and the like.

The tration of the active ingredients in the synergistic composition of the present invention is generally from 0.1 to 98 percent by weight. Concentrations from 10 to 90 percent by weight are often ed. In itions ed to be employed as concentrates, the active ingredients are generally present in a concentration from 5 to 98 weight percent, preferably 10 to 90 weight percent. Such compositions are typically diluted with an inert carrier, such as water, before making a postemergence, foliar application to exposed weed and crop e, or applied as a dry or liquid formulation directly into flooded rice fields. The diluted compositions usually applied as a postemergence, foliar application to weeds or the locus of weeds generally contain 0.25 to 20 weight percent active ingredient and preferably contain 0.4 to 14 weight percent.

The present compositions can be applied to weeds or their locus by the use of conventional ground or aerial dusters, sprayers, and granule applicators, by addition to irrigation or paddy water, and by other conventional means known to those skilled in the art.

The following examples illustrate the present invention.

W0 2012/106566 Examples Evaluation of Postemergence Herbicidal Activity of Mixtures in the Greenhouse Seeds of the desired test plant species were planted in 80% mineral soil/20% grit planting mixture, which typically has a pH of 7.2 and an organic matter content of 2.9 percent, in c pots with a surface area of 128 square centimeters (cmZ). The growing medium was steam sterilized. The plants were grown for 7-19 days in a greenhouse with an approximate 14-hour (h) photoperiod which was maintained at 29 0C during the day and 26 0C during the night. Nutrients and water were added on a regular basis and supplemental lighting was provided with overhead metal halide 1000-Watt lamps as necessary. The plants were treated with postemergence foliar applications when they reached the second to fourth true leaf stage. All treatments were applied using a randomized complete block trial , with 4 ations per treatment.

Formulated amounts of penoxsulam and glyphosate IPA salt were placed in 60 milliliter (mL) glass vials and dissolved in a volume of 60 mL of a water solution containing Agri-dex crop oil concentrate in a 1% volume per volume (v/v) ratio. Compound requirements are based upon a 12 mL application volume at a rate of 187 liters per hectare (L/ha). Spray solutions of the mixtures were prepared by adding the stock solutions to the appropriate amount of dilution solution to form 12 mL spray solution with active ingredients in single and two way combinations. Formulated compounds were applied to the plant material with an overhead Mandel track r ed with 8002E nozzles calibrated to r 187 L/ha at a spray height of 18 inches (43 centimeters (cm)) above average plant canopy. The weed spectrum included broadleaf signalgrass iaria platyphylla, BRAPP), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus, CYPES), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus- galli, ECHCG), morningglory ea, hederacea, IPOHE), and Chinese sprangletop chloa chinensis, LEFCH).

The treated plants and control plants were placed in a greenhouse as described above and d by sub-irrigation to prevent wash-off of the test compounds. Treatments were rated at 16 days after application (DAA) as compared to the untreated control . Visual weed control was scored on a scale of 0 to 100 percent where 0 corresponds to no injury and 100 corresponds to complete kill. Results are reported in Tables 1-3.

W0 2012/106566 tion of ergence Herbicidal Activity of Mixtures under Field Conditions Methodology Trial site was located in commercially grown vines of European grape (Vitis vinifera). The trial was conducted using normal research ology. Trial plots were n 2 m wide by 6 10 m long. All treatments were applied using a randomized complete block trial design with 3 ations per treatment. The trial sites had naturally occurring populations of weeds. The weed spectrum included, but was not limited to, ryegrass (Lolium spp, LOLSS), scented mayweed (Matricaria chamomilla, MATCH), and annual bluegrass (Poa annua, POAAN).

Treatments consisted of tank mixes of an oil dispersion of penoxsulam and commercially available formulation of sate applied in water. The application volume was 250 liters per hectare (L/ha). Application was made using a precision gas hand sprayer at 250 kPA pressure using a 2 m boom with flat fan (80015VS) nozzles to broadcast the treatments to the weeds and to the soil.

The treated and control pots were rated blind at s intervals after ation, with the last evaluation taken 16 days after application. Ratings were based on Percent (%) Visual weed control, where 0 corresponds to no control and 100 corresponds to te control. Results are reported in Table 4.

Evaluation Data was collected and analyzed using various statistical methods.

Colby’s equation was used to determine the herbicidal effects expected from the mixtures (Colby, S. R. Calculation of the synergistic and antagonistic se of ide combinations. Weeds 1967 15, 20-22).

The following equation was used to calculate the expected activity of mixtures containing two active ingredients, A and B: Expected = A + B - (A x B/lOO) A = observed efficacy of active ingredient A at the same concentration as used in the mixture ; W0 2012/106566 B = observed efficacy of active ingredient B at the same concentration as used in the mixture.

The results are summarized in Tables 1-4.

Table 1. Control of CYPES and LEFCH in the greenhouse with Penoxsulam plus 53 grams ai/ha of Glyphosate Days Penoxsulam Glyphosate CYPES LEFCH After (rate in grams ai/ha) Application Obs Exp* Obs Exp* CYPES = yellow nutsedge, grams ai/ha = grams of active ingredient Cyperus esculentus per hectare LEFCH = Chinese sprangletop, Obs = Observed control (%) hloa sis EXp* = Expected control (%) 2012/023707 Table 2. Control of CYPES and BRAPP in the greenhouse with Penoxsulam plus 110 grams ai/ha of Glyphosate Days Penoxsulam Glyphosate CYPES BRAPP After (rate in grams ai/ha) Application Obs Exp* Obs Exp* CYPES = yellow nutsedge, grams ai/ha = grams of active ingredient s esculentus per hectare BRAPP = broadleaf signalgrass, 10 Obs = Observed control (%) Brachiaria plalyphylla EXp* = Expected control (%) Table 3. Control of CYPES, ECHCG, IPOHE and LEFCH in the greenhouse with Penoxsulam plus 210 grams ai/ha of Glyphosate Penox- Glypho- sulam sate (rate in grams ai/ha) cation Obs Exp* Obs Exp* Obs Exp* Obs Exp* CYPES = yellow nutsedge, IPOHE = morningglory, Ipomoea s esculentus hederacea LEFCH = Chinese sprangletop, grams ai/ha = grams of active ingredient Leptochloa chinensis per hectare ECHCG = barnyardgrass, Obs = Observed control (%) Echinochloa crus-galli EXp* = Expected l (%) Table 4. S ner istic control of MATCH POAAN and LOLSS in the field with 20 + 720 rams ai/ha of Penoxsulam + G] hosate res ectivel Penox' Glyph“ MATCH POAAN LOLSS sulam sate (rate in grams ai/ha) ' Obs Exp* Obs Exp* Obs Exp* LOLSS = ryegrass, Lolium spp.i—ngredientgrams ai/ha = grams of active MATCH = scented mayweed, per hectare Matricaria Chamomilla Obs = Observed l (%) POAAN = annual bluegrass, Poa EXp* = Expected control (%) annua 1001140880 Reference to any prior art in the specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment, or any form of suggestion, that this prior art forms part of the common general knowledge in New d or any other jurisdiction or that this prior art could reasonably be expected to be ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant by a person skilled in the art.

As used herein, except where the context requires otherwise, the term "comprise" and variations of the term, such as ”comprisingH H , ses" and ised", are not intended to exclude other additives, components, integers or steps. 1001140880

Claims (8)

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A synergistic herbicidal mixture comprising an herbicidally effective amount of (a) penoxsulam and (b) glyphosate, wherein the weight ratio of sate to ulam is from 4:1 to 448:1. U}

2. The synergistic herbicidal mixture of Claim 1 in which sate is an agriculturally acceptable salt.

3. An herbicidal composition comprising an herbicidally effective amount of the synergistic idal mixture of Claim 1 or 2 and an agriculturally acceptable adjuvant and/or carrier. 10

4. A method of lling undesirable vegetation which comprises contacting the vegetation or the locus thereof with an herbicidally effective amount of the synergistic herbicidal mixture of Claim 1 or 2.

5. A method of controlling undesirable vegetation which comprises contacting the vegetation or the locus thereof with an herbicidally effective amount of the herbicidal 15 composition of Claim 3.

6. The method ofClaim 4 or 5, wherein the undesirable vegetation is in vines, pasture. rangeland, industrial vegetation management, cs or turf.

7. The method of Claim 4 or 5, wherein the undesirable vegetation is in a glyphosate tolerant crop. 20

8. The synergistic herbicidal e of Claim 1, substantially as herein described.