James & Wells ref: 133767
A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A LENGTH OF MATERIAL
STATEMENT OF CORRESPONDING APPLICATIONS
This application is based on the Provisional specification filed in relation to New Zealand Patent
Application Number 600483, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing a length of material. In
particular this invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing a portion of wood
such as a stem, log, or other piece of wood.
BACKGROUND ART
The modern forestry industry is continually seeking to improve efficiency in processing wood. It
is well-known to mount a timber-working head, for example in the form of a harvesting head, to
a forestry work machine to perform a number of functions in connection with timber. Such
heads may be used to grapple and fell a standing tree and process the felled tree by delimbing,
possibly debarking (depending on the configuration of the head), and cutting the stem of the
tree.
Many such harvester heads have the ability to measure the diameter and length of a log and
automatically determine the optimal position of saw cuts in order to maximise the value of that
log.
US Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0074563 illustrates a method of producing a log
cutting solution based on a model of a delimbed log. The disclosure refers to optimising the
cutting based on either prioritising particular lengths, or the total dollar value of the combination
of lengths which may be produced from a log.
Automation of this process would be expected to improve productivity. Previously, an operator
may have been required to calculate optimal value manually, or manually control the harvester
head to perform cutting at previously measured and marked points along the stem. US Patent
Number 5,457,635 describes a portable apparatus for measuring and marking a felled tree prior
to it being processed. This either requires additional labour units to complete, or takes
harvester operators away from their core tasks, resulting in low productivity.
James & Wells ref: 133767
However, there are instances which still require the operator to manually determine and
perform optimisation. In particular, systems such as US Patent Application Publication No.
2004/0074563 do not account for situations where the log includes a defect such as a broken
top which will significantly affect the value of the wood at that point.
A stem optimisation system which seeks to account for defects in a tree stem is provided by the
ForestBucker™ manufactured by Electronics123 Ltd at the time of filing the present application,
see <http://forestbucker.electronics123.co.nz/Home/forestbucker>. This system scans a tree
stem in order to identify defects in the stem and develops a cutting solution which accounts for
these defects as well as length and profile.
However, this system requires the use of large scale equipment, such as a trolley configured to
run on tracks the length of the log. This set up requires a significant amount of space and a
relatively even terrain, which may not be available at the site in which the harvester is
operating. Further, one of the advantages to modern mechanical harvester heads is the ease
with which they may be fitted to wheeled or tracked vehicles in order to improve portability and
enable them to be used in relatively rough terrain. The use of a log scanner at a fixed location
would limit the usefulness of such harvester heads.
Additionally, a separate scanning or measurement apparatus would require additional
processing steps – including the placement of the log for scanning, waiting for the scanning to
be completed, and subsequently retrieving the log in order to perform the sawing. The
associated downtime for the harvester head and harvester operator would reduce productivity.
As such, where a significant defect is identified by an operator during processing of a log, the
operator is currently required to manually determine the optimal cutting solution for the log.
This process takes time and causes operator stress and fatigue, which may in turn lead to
errors in optimisation and lost value to the forest owner.
It is an object of the present invention to address the foregoing problems or at least to provide
the public with a useful choice.
All references, including any patents or patent applications cited in this specification are hereby
incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any reference constitutes prior art. The
discussion of the references states what their authors assert, and the applicants reserve the
right to challenge the accuracy and pertinency of the cited documents. It will be clearly
understood that, although a number of prior art publications are referred to herein, this
reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents form part of the
common general knowledge in the art, in New Zealand or in any other country.
James & Wells ref: 133767
Throughout this specification, the word "comprise", or variations thereof such as "comprises" or
"comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or
group of elements integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step,
or group of elements, integers or steps.
Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the
ensuing description which is given by way of example only.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for use in
processing a length of material utilising a timber-working head, including the steps of:
measuring the distance between a first end point on the length of material and a second
end point on the length of material with a distance measuring device associated with the timber-
working head to determine the actual length of material to be processed,
wherein the first end point is manually designated as being the first end point.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided an apparatus for
processing a length of material, including:
at least one processor configured to:
receive a signal indicating manual designation of a point along the length of
material as a first end point;
receive at least one signal from at least one distance measuring device
associated with a timber-working head, the signal indicating the distance between the
first end point and a second end point on the length of material; and
determine the actual length of material to be processed.
In a preferred embodiment the present invention includes determining at least one cutting
position along the actual length of material, such that the value of lengths of material between
the end points and cutting position is optimised.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for processing
a length of material, including:
a timber-working head, including:
James & Wells ref: 133767
at least one cutting means;
a drive mechanism configured to drive the length of material relative to the
harvester head; and
at least one distance measuring device; and
at least one processor configured to:
receive a signal indicating manual designation of a point along the length of
material as an first end point;
receive at least one signal from the distance measuring device, the signal
indicating the distance between the first end point to a second end point on the length of
material with a sensor;
determine the actual length of material to be processed;
determine at least one cutting position along the actual length of material, such
that the value of lengths of material between the end points and cutting position is
optimised; and
control the timber-working head to cut the length of material at the cutting
position using the cutting means.
Preferably the timber-working head is a harvester head, and may be referred to as such
throughout the specification. Harvester heads typically have the capacity to grapple and fell a
standing tree, delimb and/or debark a felled stem, and cut the stem into logs. However, a
person skilled in the art should appreciate that the present invention may be used with other
implements which perform cutting or sawing in the course of processing a length of material,
especially where a defect may be manually identified at some point along the length of that
material.
Also, reference will herein be made throughout the specification to the length of material as
being the stem of a tree. It should be appreciated that while it is envisaged that the present
invention may have particular application to the processing of a felled tree stem, this is not
intended to be limiting. For example, the present invention may be used in the processing of
other wood products – such as wood which has been sawn into boards – although the
principles of the present invention could be applied to effectively any material where it is
desirable to involve the operator in identifying defects in the length being processed in order to
influence optimisation of a cutting position.
Reference to actual length of material to be processed should be understood to mean the
James & Wells ref: 133767
length of material which has been determined to be, or designated as, useable. In the context
of processing of a tree stem, the actual length may be the distance between a previous saw cut
and a point at which a defect in the stem – such as a broken end or spike knot – may be sawn
off.
Preferably the cutting means includes at least one saw blade. Harvester heads may include a
main saw which is primarily used for the felling and cross cutting of stems. Further, some
harvester heads may include a secondary or topping saw. The topping saw is typically of a
lower specification than the main saw, and used primarily during processing once a tree is
felled. It should be appreciated that the present invention may determine the length of material
to be processed and/or the cutting positions based at least in part on the relative positions of
the main saw and topping saw.
Harvester heads typically include a drive mechanism in the form of at least one driven feed
wheel – for example feed wheels mounted on grapple arms which grip the stem and control
position of the stem relative to the saw or saws. The drive mechanism allows the stem to be
moved along a feed axis of the harvester head for debarking, delimbing, and sawing.
A distance measurement device may be incorporated into or associated with the drive
mechanism, or a separate device. An example of a distance measurement device is a rotary
encoded measuring wheel, which rotates as a stem is driven relative to the harvester head.
In a preferred embodiment the harvester head measures other characteristics of the stem. In
particular, the harvester head preferably measures diameter of the stem. It is known to
measure diameter using deflection of the delimbing knives, or drive arms. Other characteristics
such as stiffness or strength may also be measured, for example as described in New Zealand
Patent No. 545247 titled “Method and apparatus for assessing or predicting the characteristics
of wood”.
Manual designation of the first end point may be achieved by any suitable means known in the
art. For example, the manual designation may be achieved by the selection of a button on a
user interface used to control operation of the harvester head.
Preferably manual designation of the first end point is performed by the operator of the
harvester head. The operators of such harvester heads typically have experience with
identifying defects in a tree stem, are aware of the likely effect on value of such defects, and
are constantly monitoring processing of the stem anyway. Drawing on this experience to
capture the presence of defects in order to delimit the actual length of stem to be processed is
considered to be more time and cost effective than currently available scanning technology.
It should be appreciated that manual designation of the first end point may be performed after
James & Wells ref: 133767
measurement from the second point has been performed. For example, the harvester may
make a saw cut designating the second end point and initiating distance measurement. The
harvester head may then feed the stem through to a point which the operator manually
designates as the first end point. The distance from the previous saw cut will have been
measured by the harvester head anyway, and may not require re-measurement after the
manual designation has occurred.
In one embodiment the manual designation of the first end point interrupts a previously
established processing sequence of the length of material. For example, the harvester head
may be travelling towards a next cutting position in an automated routine when the operator
manually designates an end point before reaching that cutting position, or manually feeds the
stem past the previously designated cutting position.
In a preferred embodiment the manual designation of the first end point includes an operator
initiating re-optimisation of the material being processed.
In some known optimisation methods, data relating to the stems previously processed by the
harvester head may be used to predict the optimal cutting positions for the next stem. In doing
so, the harvester does not need to measure the length of the stem prior to processing it.
This is done for a number of reasons, primarily the demand for time efficiency. The length of
time it takes to measure the entire length of the log prior to developing the cutting solutions and
carrying them out is not ideal. Further, it is generally desirable to reduce the number of passes
a harvester head needs to make along the stem in order to reduce the damage to the stem by
the drive rollers – particularly for softer or ornamental wood where the value may decrease with
bruising.
It is envisaged that the present invention may have particular application to harvesting systems
which use such a prediction method for optimisation. The present invention may allow standard
operating procedures to be carried out, while providing the option to interrupt the process and
permit re-optimisation of the remaining length of the stem using the manually designated end
point.
In doing so, there may be minimal interruption to standard operating procedures, while allowing
for the greatest value to be derived from the stem when the operator identifies a defect.
Further, this prediction uses the length of the stems previously measured during processing,
and uses the current diameter measurement to predict the likely remaining useable length of
the stem currently being processed. It is envisaged that when the present invention is used to
manually designate an end point, the data collected in relation to that stem may be disregarded
for the purpose of the ongoing calibration of the standard optimisation process. In doing so, the
James & Wells ref: 133767
effect of the abnormality of the present stem on the accuracy of the standard optimisation
process may be reduced.
The process of optimising the value of logs which may be obtained from a stem is well known in
the art. In addition to length, the value of a log may include factors such as diameter and
grade. A value matrix uses these measured variables together with market prices to determine
the most valuable combination of lengths which may be obtained from the actual length of the
stem. Optimisation may also account for targeted length and diameters for a particular stand of
trees, which meets the demands of the forest owner while perhaps not producing the highest
dollar value combination based on market values.
In a preferred embodiment, the cutting positions are determined such that the end of the stem
with the larger diameter is prioritised over the end with the lesser diameter. While this is not
intended to be limiting, it is envisaged that in doing so wastage may be reduced.
It is envisaged that the proposed cutting positions may be presented to the operator
sequentially. In a preferred embodiment the operator may be able to manually alter the grade
of the length of material to be processed next. In doing so, optimisation of the remainder of the
stem to be processed may be performed again, and new cutting positions determined.
Further, the operator may be able to override the next cutting position and select another
position. As above, optimisation of the remainder of the actual length may be performed again,
and new cutting positions determined.
The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in
connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic
hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. In particular, they may be implemented
or performed with a general purpose processor such as a microprocessor, or any other suitable
means known in the art designed to perform the functions described.
The steps of a method or algorithm and functions described in connection with the
embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module
executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. If implemented in software, the
functions may be stored as processor readable instructions or code on a tangible,
non-transitory processor-readable medium – for example Random Access Memory (RAM),
flash memory, Read Only Memory (ROM), hard disks, a removable disk such as a CD ROM, or
any other suitable storage medium known to a person skilled in the art. A storage medium may
be connected to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write
information to, the storage medium.
James & Wells ref: 133767
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description
which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings in
which:
is a side view of a forestry work machine including a timber-working head for
processing a tree stem according to one embodiment of the present invention;
is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining the actual length of a stem
according to one aspect of the present invention;
is a flowchart illustrating a method for processing a stem according to another
aspect of the present invention;
illustrates a stem to be processed according to one aspect of the present
invention;
illustrates a cutting solution for the stem according to an embodiment of the
present invention;
illustrates a stem to be processed according to one aspect of the present
invention, and
illustrates a cutting solution for the stem according to an embodiment of the
present invention.
BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
illustrates a forestry work machine (generally indicated by arrow 1) including a carrier 2
supporting an articulated boom 3. A timber working implement in the form of a harvester head
4 is connected to an end of the boom 3, using a dog-bone joint 5 connected to a rotator 6,
which is in turn connected to a frame 7 of the head 4 by hanger 8. In operation, the head 4
may swivel relative to the end of the boom 3 about the rotator 6, and pivotally move about its
connection to the hanger 8 between a generally upright, harvesting position for felling a tree
(not illustrated) and a generally prone, processing position (as illustrated) for processing the
felled tree (e.g., delimbing, debarking, cutting to length).
The harvester head 4 includes grapple or delimbing arms 9 pivotally connected to the frame 7
and configured to grasp the stem of the tree. The head 4 also includes a pair of drive arms 10
pivotally connected to the frame 7 and including drive wheels configured to control the
James & Wells ref: 133767
longitudinal position of the tree relative to the head 4. The harvester head 4 also includes a
main chain saw at the end marked by arrow 11, and a top chain saw at the end marked by
arrow 12.
The machine 1, particularly harvester head 4, may be controlled by an operator (not illustrated)
using hand and foot controls as known in the art. A controller 13 controls operation of the
harvester head 4 in response to data or signals received from various components of the
harvester head 4 and in conjunction with the operator input devices.
The controller 13 may further receive signals from the harvester 4 pertaining to the position of
the harvester 4 relative to a stem 14 (and thus length measurements of the stem 14), and
diameter of the stem 14. The controller 13 may use these signals from the harvester head 4, or
sensors associated with the harvester head 4, in order to determine cutting positions on the
stem 14 in order to optimise the value of logs cut from the stem 14.
These cutting positions may be presented to the operator on a display 15. For example,
information regarding the current log to be cut from the stem 14 may be presented in the
central area 16. The next logs in the sequence may be displayed in a queuing area 17. In this
embodiment, the display 15 is a touchscreen and a selectable button 18 is provided to enable
the operator to manually designate an end point on the stem 14.
Operation of the forestry work machine 1 will be described with reference to and
illustrates a method 200 by which the actual length of the stem 14 to be processed is
determined.
In the course of processing the stem 14, the operator notes that there is a break 19 in the stem
14. The operator observes that the diameter of the stem 14 at the break 19 appears to be over
a minimum diameter for the stand of trees from which the stem 14 was cut, and that the length
of the stem 14 up to the break 19 appears to be of log quality.
In step 201, the operator performs a cut at point 20 to establish an end point.
The operator then feeds the stem 14 through the harvester head 4 using the drive arms 10 in
step 202. While the stem 14 is being fed through, the controller 13 receives signals from a
distance measuring wheel (not illustrated) having a rotary encoder, indicating the distance
travelled. Diameter measurements are also taken at 100 millimetre intervals using deflection of
the drive arms 10 or delimbing arms 9.
In step 203 the operator determines that the head has reached a point 21 where either the
mainsaw 11 or topsaw 12 can make a clean cut through the stem 14 as close as possible to the
break 19, and presses the button 18 to manually designate another end point.
James & Wells ref: 133767
In step 204 the controller 13 then determines the actual length of the stem 14 to be processed.
illustrates the subsequent method 300 by which the stem 14 is processed.
In step 301, the controller 13 uses the actual length and measured diameters to determine at
least one cutting position along the actual length of the stem 14 such that the value of the
resulting logs is optimised.
These are displayed to the operator in step 302, who can choose to make changes in step 303
– for example changing the grade of the actual length of the stem 14, or manually overriding
the cutting solution to alter the length of the next cut. Those changes may require re-
optimisation in step 301.
If the operator approves the cutting solution, then the harvester head 4 is controlled to perform
the next programmed cut in step 304. After performing the cut, the controller 7 checks whether
there are any further cuts to be made in step 305. If there are, steps 303 to 305 are repeated.
If not, the actual length of the stem 14 has been processed.
and provide an example of optimisation of the actual length of a stem. In 4a it may be seen that the actual length of a stem 400 has been determined to be 9.5m.
Exemplary values of various log lengths are outlined in the following Table 1:
Log length (m) Value ($)
4.0 500
4.5 550
.0 400
.5 450
6.0 500
6.5 550
7.0 600
12.0 950
For ease of illustration the value of logs are determined based solely on length, without
factoring diameter into the equation.
Calculated cutting priorities for the actual length of the stem 400 are outlined in the following
Table 2:
Priority Value ($) Log Composition Total Length (m)
1 1100 2 x 4.5m 9.0
2 1050 1 x 4.0m; 1 x 4.5m 9.5
3 1000 2 x 4.0m 8.0
James & Wells ref: 133767
In it may be seen that in addition to logs 401a and 401b, a waste portion 402 is
produced by cutting priority 1. However, while cutting priority 2 produces less waste, the value
of the logs produced is lower than that of cutting priority 1.
and provide a further example of optimisation of the actual length. In it
may be seen that the actual length of a stem 500 has been determined to be 13.1m.
Calculated cutting priorities for the actual length of stem 500 are outlined in the following Table
Priority Value ($) Log Composition Total Length (m)
1 1600 2 x 4.5m; 1 x 4.0m 13.0
2 1550 1 x 4.5m; 2 x 4.0m 12.5
3 1500 3 x 4.0m 12.0
In it may be seen that in addition to logs 501a, 501b and 501c, a waste portion 502 is
produced by cutting priority 1. In contrast with the example of Fig 4a and 4b, the cutting priority
which produces the maximum value also produces the minimum of waste.
Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be
appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the
scope thereof as defined in the appended claims.
James & Wells ref: 133767