NZ211355A - Water-fuel oil emulsifier and emulsion thereof - Google Patents

Description

F: 21 1355 Priority Dats(s): Ccmplott SpuL-ification f, 1, vss. C!3ss: aox? .V?. .cayfek.. f. - 7 MA/? 1985 c.> Publication Dr.: ■■■ ... ?j .JULJ987. >>;. P.O. Journal. .\2Q& Patents form No.5 NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION "EMULSIONS" np ow-\ -I-,WE HYDROLINE AUSTRALIA PTY.LTD.,Aof Level 25, MLC Centre, George Street, Brisbane 4000 Queensland, Australia hereby declare the invention, for which-i/we pray that a patent may be granted to -me-Aus, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:- I # © 10 O 15 2474S The present invention relates to an emulsifier for producing heat-stable emulsions of water in fuel oil. and to the emulsions themselves and their production. In particular the emulsions may be preheated prior to combustion.

It is well known that the addition of water to liquid hydrocarbon fuels so as to form an emulsion can have a number of beneficial effects as regards the combustion of the fuel. During combustion, the tiny droplets of water vaporise explosively within the fuel itself and lead to excellent atomisation of the fuel and improve combustion efficiency. Although the addition of the water detracts from the overall calorific value of the fuel, nevertheless small savings in overall fuel consumption can be achieved. Furthermore, the presence of the water tends to reduce the overall flame temperatures leading to lower nitrogen oxide emisions. The cleaner combustion also results in less emission of unburnt fuel components and carbon monoxide. Indeed, in the case of heavy fuel oils, the cleaner combustion of emulsified fuels may lead to substantial savings in furnace maintenance costs.

Hitherto, emulsified fuels have been burned in diesel engines by mechanically emulsifying the water with the oil shortly prior to combustion. Such emulsions are not stable over long periods and each engine must be fitted with its own emulsifier. Separate storage and handling systems must also be provided for the fuel and water respectively.

Stable emulsions of water in petroleum fractions obtained using an emulsifier are known from U.S. patent 3 876 391 and U.K. patent application 2 066 288. U.S. patent 3 876 391 discloses in Table 3 the use of an emulsifier blend of Tween-80 and Span-80 to produce emulsions of water in JP4 aviation fuel. U.K. patent application 2 066 288 discloses in Example 1 the use of sorbitan monooleate (a Span) and ethoxylated sorbitan monooleate (a Tween) to emulsify water in a mixture of - -j - 21 1355 light fuel oil and methanol. However, these prior disclosures are concerned only with light petroleum fractions which do not require preheating to lower their viscosity prior to combustion.

Fuel oils require preheating (e.g. to 40-50°C for a fuel oil of 200cS viscosity) prior to combustion.

Often the fuel oil may be heated and cooled a number of times before combustion. This poses a problem since such heating generally causes water-in-oil emulsions to © 10 separate. By the term "fuel oil" we include fuel oil having a viscosity of 200-380cS and heavy fuel oils having nominal viscosities of 1000. 2000 and 6000 cS. Lighter fractions which do not require preheating, such as gasoline, automotive diesel fuel, gasoil. and o 15 industrial diesel fuel (light fuel oil of viscosity less than 200 cS). are excluded.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an emulsifier capable of producing a heat stable emulsion of water in a fuel oil.

The present invention provides an emulsifier for producing heat-stable emulsions of water in a fuel oil. which comprises an admixture of (i) 93-97 wt% of a sorbitan fatty acid monoester. and (ii) 3-7 wt% of polysorbate-80.

Typically, the fatty acid is lauric. palmitic, stearic or oleic acid. The sorbitan monoester is preferably sorbitan monooleate (available under the trade name Span-80).

Polysorbate-80 is a widely used term for the oleate ester of sorbitol copolymerised with approximately 20 moles of ethylene oxide for each mole of sorbitol. The ratio of components (i) and (ii) is in the region 93-97:3-7% by weight. If too much component (ii) is used, the emulsion becomes too viscous. This advantageous ratio is not disclosed in the prior art patent specifications discussed above. 2474S iM3 © 10 The two components must be mixed together to provide the emulsifier before addition of water. Generally, the emulsifier is mixed with the water prior to addition of the hydrocarbon. Usually, emulsifier will be added in an amount of 0.02-1% by volume based on the hydrocarbon content. The water content may be up to 70% by volume of the hydrocarbon content. For normal use in an hydrocarbon fuel, the water content will usually be in the range 5-20%. However, where a particularly cool flame is required, for example in the flare stacks of drilling rigs, larger amounts of water e.g. up to 25% may be used.

The raw emulsion is then preferably passed through a centrifugal colloid mill in order to break up the water 15 droplets.

In general, the water droplet size in the emulsion will be less than 100 microns. The drop size distribution generally varies dependent on the amount of water present. For example, in a typical 5% water 20 emulsion, the majority of the water by volume was in drops between 10 and 25 microns in diameter, although a large number of much smaller drops were also present. For a 15% water emulsion, most of the water volume lay in drops in the region 50-100 microns. 25 The water-in-oil emulsion so produced is heat-stable over the long term and handles in a similar fashion to the hydrocarbon itself. In general, it is found that boiling and centrifuging do not substantially effect the emulsion.

Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawing and Examples.

Example 1 - Production of Water/Oil Emulsion 35 Figure 1 shows a continuous blending system wherein emulsifier E is introduced from tank 4 into a water flow W in a predetermined amount. The mixture of water and emulsifier is then mixed with oil O prior to passing into 2474S 4 a premixer tank 5 equipped with a vane mixer. The premixed emulsion is then passed into a centrifugal colloid mill 6 set at a 0.003 inch (0.008 cm) spacing so as to produce a water-in-oil emulsion.

The various flows are monitored as shown in the drawing and the data fed into a central controller 7. which in turn controls water/emulsifier flow valve 1, oil flow valve 2 and the emulsifier dosing pump 3 via the dosing pump control 8. Transducers 9. 10 and 11 respectively monitor the water/emulsifier flow in line 13, emulsifier flow in line 14. and oil flow in line 15. Flow rate information from transducers 10 and 11 is fed in the controller. Ratio bias 12 allows the water/oil ratio to be set. Warning lights 1^, I2< I3< show if "no additive", "high additive" and "low oil" conditions respectively occur. From the colloidal mill, the water-in-oil emulsion passes to a storage tank where it is usually preheated in a recirculating system before being combusted.

The emulsifier consisted of a mixture of 95% by volume sorbitan monooleate (Span 80 from Atlas Chemicals - a Trade Mark) and 5% by volume polysorbate-80 (Tween 80 - a Trade Mark).

The emulsifier content of the emulsion was 0.04 volume per cent based on the oil. For the purposes of the following tests, emulsions of 5%. 10% and 15% v/v water content were prepared. The oil was a heavy fuel oil.

For the 5% water emulsion, most of the water was in drops between 10 and 25 microns in diameter, with a large number (but small volume) of very small drops from 1-2 microns. For the 10% water emulsion, the very small drops were again observed, but the size range of drops was extended up to about 75 microns. For the 15% water emulsion, the very small drops were once again observed, with the larger drops extending in size up to about 100 microns and most of the water volume in drops from 50-100 microns.

V 21 135 The emulsions produced were opaque dark coffee-coloured liquids which were stable indefinitely.

Example 2 - Combustion of Emulsions 5 Independent tests were carried out by the University of Newcastle. New South Wales into a comparison of the combustion and heat transfer characteristics of heavy fuel oil with the water-oil emulsions as produced in Example 1.

A special experimental furnace was constructed which allowed measurement of fuel flow, flue gas composition, flue gas temperature, flame and radiation temperatures, heat absorption (by a water-cooled coil) and flame visualisation. This way it is possible to construct an o 15 overall heat balance.

Photograph of flames of neat oil. 5%. 10% and 15% v/v water in oil showed qualitatively that the water/oil emulsion fuels produced shorter, more intense flames with a higher peak flame temperature. This was confirmed by 20 measurements of flame radiation with optical and total radiation pyrometers.

Measurements of the heat absorbed by the water-cooled coil surrounding the flame showed that the increased flame temperatures resulted in higher heat transfer rates and higher furnace thermal efficiencies.

The greatest increase in efficiency was achieved with a % water in oil emulsion, and this also led to an o increase in peak flame temperature of about 50 C.

The results of the heat balance on the furnace are 30 given in the Table, which shows the percentage of heat absorbed in the water-cooled loop which is a measure of the heat produced in the flame. It can be seen that the amount of heat produced in the flame is generally greater for the water-in-oil emulsions, particularly for the 10% water content. However, it is generally noted that at the lower water contents (e.g. 5%) there is a reduction in heat output, presumably due to the reduction in calorific value of the fuel exceeding the increase in 2474S - 6 " • \.r* V ' combustion efficiency. 21135 Thermal input Heat absorbed in % water-cooled loop % Flue gas loss % Wall loss % Unaccounted loss % Table Water Content % v/v 0 5 10 15 100 100 100 100 38 43 9 42 11 12 44 44 2 41 44 r> Example 3 - Comparison of Emulsion stabilities A) Emulsions of water in heavy fuel oil were prepared using the following emulsifier blends falling outside the scope of the present invention i) sorbitan monooleate + Tween 20 ii) sorbitan monooleate + Tween 81 iii) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate + Tween 80 iv) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate + Tween 81 v) dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate + Tween 20 In each blend the two components were varied from /95 wt% to 95/5 wt% in increments of 10 wt%.

In some cases stable water-in-oil emulsions resulted, but these emulsions separated once heated to o 45 C. In no case did a heat-stable emulsion result.

B) Emulsions of water in heavy fuel oil were prepared using an emulsifier blend of sorbitan monooleate + Tween 80 in varying proportions from 5/95 wt% to 95/5 wt% in increments of 5 wt%. It was found that the following blend 95 wt% sorbitan monooleate + 5 wt% Tween 80 gave the best results in terms of producing a heat-stable water-in-oil emulsion. 2474S

Claims (6)

V. w WHAT -WWE CLAIM IS;- WiE CtA^MS DBF I MI HG WE -WVTWTION -ARE -AS- FOLLOWS :

1. An emulsifier for producing heat-stable emulsions of water in a fuel oil. which comprises an admixture of (i) 93-97 wt% of a sorbitan fatty acid monoester. and (ii) 3-7 wt% of polysorbate-80.

2. An emulsifier according to claim 1. wherein the 0^ monoester is sorbitan monooleate.

3. A heat-stable emulsion of water-in-fuel oil which comprises fuel oil. a 0.02-1% by volume of the emulsifier of either preceding claim based on the volume of the fuel oil. and water.

4. An emulsion according to claim 3 wherein the water content is 5-20% by volume based on the volume of the fuel oil.

5. An emulsion according to claim 3 or 4 wherein substantially all the water droplets have a size less than 75 microns.

6. An emulsion substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Example 1 and Example 3B. c HYDROLIKE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED By their attorneys BALDWIN SON & CAREY 2 9 MAY 1987 « 2474S - 8