NZ198572A - Preparing agglomerated fibrous ion-exchange cellulose composites - Google Patents

Description

New Zealand Paient Spedficaiion for Paient Number 1 98572 198572 Priority Dsta'i): A'.I £<?. (Ji)....

Com?Jsta Sp-sci'icatfon Filed: 7.' CSsss: Will Publics >"o P.O. Jc^ FJo: j5 1 JAN 1985 r* ;,26 SEP 191 ;c ;Patents Form No. 5 ;NEW ZEALAND PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION ;"IMPROVED PROCESS FOR PREPARING AGGLOMERATED FIBROUS CELLULOSE" ;X/WE STANDARD BRANDS INCORPORATED, a corporation ;IqvjS. ;organised and existing under the ^Lase of the State of Delaware, 625 Madison Avenue, City and State of N.Y., U. ;hereby declare the invention, for which X/we pray that a patent may be granted to HK/us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:- ;-1- ;(followed by 1A) ;37,06/3707 _ ;1 985 ;IMPROVED PROCESS FOR PREPARING AGGLOMERATED FIBROUS CELLULOSE ;D This invention relates to an improved process for preparing agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites. More particularly, this invention relates to a more efficient process for preparing such composites having greater ion exchange capacity than those prepared by prior art methods. . . ;In food processing and other commercial applications the use of microbial or fungal enzymes adsorbed onto or bonded to inert carriers to provide immobilized biological catalysts has largely superseded ;15 ;^older methods wherein soluble enzymes or whole cells of microorganisms were utilized. In general, the use of immobilized enzymes provides a number of significant advantages over the older methods. The major advantage is that the immobilized enzymes are adaptable for use in con- ;Of) ;tinuous conversion processes. Thus, a more efficient use of the enzyme is attained and the contact time between the enzyme and the substrate is reduced, thereby resulting in an improved product quality and a reduction in enzyme and production costs. ;Although the following description and Examples are primarily directed to the utilization of agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose to adsorb and immobilize glucose isomerase, it is contemplated that the agglomerated material will have the capability of adsorbing other ;3° enzymes, charged macro-molecules such as other proteins, nucleic acids and the like, and, further, would be capable ;35 ;1 985 ;1 of recovery of said molecules from a variety of substances such as food waste streams, e.g. recovery of protein from milk whey, meat processing streams and vegetable processing streams, reduction of BOD from waste streams, etc. 5 Because of the economics involved in producing glucose isomerase, it is of the utmost importance to use the isomerase under conditions whereby maximum yields of fructose are produced using minimum quantities of the enzyme. Moreover, the conditions for isomerization should be such 10 that minimal quantities of objectionable by-products are produced. ;In recent years, more economical methods for producing fructose-containing solutions have been developed utilizing glucose isomerase bound or immobilized on inert 15 support materials. Such materials include various polymeric substances such as derivatized cellulose, ion exchange resins and synthetic fibers, glass, insoluble organic and inorganic compounds, etc. Glucose isomerase has also been encapsulated or englobed in suitable materials but such preparations suffer 20 from the disadvantage that they generally cannot be reused. ;Cellulose occurs in nature as a linear polymer comprised of anhydroglucose units joined together by -1,4 glucosidic bonds. Each anhydroglucose unit contains three free hydroxyl groups capable of reacting with appropriate reagents to form insoluble cellulose derivatives which, ;due to their relative inertness, large surface area and open, porous structure, have a high adsorptive or ion-2qexchange capacity for protein molecules. ;The preparation and utilization of ion exchange . enzyme adsorbents derived from cellulose are known in the art. Peterson and Sober, J.A.C.S. 78, 751 (1956) and Guthrie and Bullock, I/EC, 52, 935 (1960) described methods ;1985 72 ;1 for preparing adsorptive cellulose products which could be utilized to separate or purify enzymes and other proteins. Tsumura et al., Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi, 14 (12), (1967) discloses binding glucose isomerase to DEAE-Sephadex. ;5 U.S. Pat. No. 3,708,397 to SipOs relates to a process for immobilizing glucose isomerase on basic anion exchange celluloses. U.S. Pat. No. 3,823,133 to Hurst et al. is directed to a method for preparing cationic cellulose ethers having a high adsorptive capacity for 10 enzymes and other proteinaceous materials. U.S. Pat. No. 3,838,007-to van Velzen sets forth a process in which an enzyme preparation is obtained in particulate form. ;U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,788,945 and 3,909,354, both to Thompson et al., disclose continuous processes for converting glucose 15 to fructose by passing a glucose-containing solution through fixed or fluidized beds containing glucose isomerase bound to various cellulose products. U.S. Pat. No. 3,947,325 to Dinelli et al. is directed to the preparation of cellulose-containing englobed enzymatic material. The cellulose is 20 formed from an emulsion comprising an aqueous enzyme solution and nitrocellulose. U.S. Pat. No. 3,956,065 to Idaszak et al. is concerned with a continuous process for converting glucose to fructose whereby a glucose-containing solution is passed through a bed comprising a 25 cellulose derivative having glucose isomerase immobilized thereon and non-porous or granular polystyrene beads. The beads inhibit packing and channeling of the bed when such is used in flow reactors. Peska et al. in an article entitled "Ion Exchange Derivatives of Bead Cellulose," Die 30 Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 53, pp. 73-80 (1976), desc-ribes several derivatized celluloses prepared in bead form. ;35 ;-4- ;198572 ;1 U.S. Patents 4,110,164 and 4,168,250 both to ;Sutthoff et al. relate to agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites and processes for preparing the same. In these processes a hydrophobic polymer is 5 combined with fibrous cellulose which has previously been derivatized to impart ion exchange properties thereto. Although these composites perform satisfactorily in a number of applications, their ion exchange capability and capacity for adsorbing or binding glucose isomerase are 10 not as great as desired. Moreover, the economics of these processes are such as to make the production of the composites more costly than is preferred. ;The present invention relates to a process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose 15 composite capable of adsorbing or binding charged macro-molecules wherein a fibrous cellulose having ion exchange properties is agglomerated with a hydrophobic polymer by first forming an agglomerate comprising a fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer and then derivatizing the agglom-20erated fibrous ion exchange cellulose to impart ion exchange properties thereto. ;25 ;30 ;35 ;1 985 ;An improved process is provided for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite ^ wherein relatively large portions of the cellulose are free to adsorb charged macro-molecules. An agglomerate is formed comprising fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer following which the cellulose is derivatized to impart ion exchange properties thereto. ;10 ;The term "fibrous" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to cellulose derived from natural sources which has been subdivided or fiberized by mechanical or chemical means and does not include ;15 ;cellulose or derivatives therof which have been subjected to chemical treatments which result in dissolution of the natural fibrous structure of the cellulose such as may occur when cellulose is derivatized to high degrees of substitution. ;20 ;Fibrous cellulose can be derivatized to provide ion exchange materials having high loading capacities in regard to adsorbing or immobilizing macro-molecules. For this purpose, the cellulose may be derivatized to provide ion exchange materials having either anion or cation exchange ;25 ;capabilities, depending upon the charge present on the material to be adsorbed. When the material to be adsorbed is glucose isomerase, the cellulose will advantageously be derivatized to the anion exchange form since in this form its loading capacity for this enzyme is extremely high. ;3® Typically, to produce the anion exchange form, the agglomerated fibrous cellulose will be treated with appropriate reagents to form, among others, the di- and tre-ethyl-aminoethyl celluloses, such as DEAE-cellulose and TEAE-cellulose, and the cellulose derivatives of epichlorohydrin ;-6- ;198572 ;1 and triethanolamine, such as ECTEOLA-cellulose. Background information and methods for derivatizing cellulose are disclosed in U.S. Patent 3,823,133 to Hurst, et al. ;Due to the high loading capacity of fibrous ion 5 exchange cellulose preparations containing glucose isomerase, ;when such are utilized in industrial applications, relatively small reactors may be employed to convert large quantities of glucose to fructose. ;Additionally, because of this high loading capacity, 10 the substrate and the resulting product are maintained under isomerization conditions for only a short period. These isomerization conditions, generally are conducive to production of small amounts of unwanted by-products due to the reactive nature of the fructose, and, thus, the longer the period the 15 fructose is maintained under such conditions, the greater the amounts of unwanted by-products produced. Thus, the high loading capacity of fibrous ion exchange cellulose results in the substrate being isomerized to the desired degree in a short time, thereby decreasing the period during which the fructose component 20 is maintained under isomerization conditions. However, such preparations containing fibrous ion exchange.cellulose suffer from the disadvantage of "packing" and, therefore, such are usually utilized in shallow beds to avoid the development of problems due to excessive backpressure. Even when shallow beds 25 are utilized, there is the possibility of channeling occurring whereby the substrate is not contacted to the desired degree with the bound or immobilized glucose isomerase. Although certain immobilized glucose isomerase preparations have been developed to minimize these problems, they generally suffer other dis-30 advantages, e.g., their enzyme capacity or activity per unit volume is not as high as is desired, and/or they are not as economical as fibrous ion exchange cellulose. ;35 ;1985 72 ;1 In practicing the present invention a number of polymers may be utilized to agglomerate the fibrous cellulose. Exemplary of such are melamine formaldehyde resins, epoxy resins, polystyrene and the like. The preferred polymer is polystyrene. ;5 In U.S. Patents 4,110,164 and 4,168,250 it is dis closed that v/hen fibrous cellulose which has been derivatized to provide an ion exchange material is agglomerated with a hydrophobic polymer under suitable conditions, such cellulose retains its capacity to immobilize or bind glucose isomerase. 10 The preferred process taught for preparing the composites comprises treating alkali-cellulose with a solution of diethyl-aminoethyl chloride hydrochloride (DEC) and then agglomerating the derivatized ion exchange cellulose formed thereby with polystyrene. Due to the solubility of polystyrene in the DEC 15 reaction mixture, however, it would be anticipated that the cellulose could not be efficiently derivatized if the agglomerates were formed prior to derivatization of the cellulose. ;We have surprisingly discovered that fibrous cellulose can be efficiently derivatized in the presence of the hydrophobic 20 polymer by controlling process conditions during derivatization so as to prevent the polymer from becoming solubilized in the derivatizing solution. Thus, it has been found that by adding the derivatizing material at a controlled rate to a water suspension of the agglomerate under alkaline conditions, the 25 hydrophobic polymer component of the granular composite does not become solubilized to a significant degree. ;A further unexpected finding is that when the cellulose is derivatized following agglomeration thereof, the cellulose composite may be derivatized to a higher degree and thus 30 have a greater ion exchange capacity than the agglomerated cellulose composite produced by the process of the prior art, ;.35 ;198572 ;1 wherein the cellulose is derivatized before agglomeration. ;While the ion exchange capacity of the agglomerated fibrous cellulose composite of this invention may vary v.'idely, typically the ion exchange capacity should be at least about 0.1 meq 5 g-1 and preferably at least about 0,2 meq g-1. ;The agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites of this invention may also be regenerated, that isf after the activity of the immobilized glucose isomerase has decreased to a certain extent due to denaturation or other 10 factors resulting from prolonged user a solution of solubilized glucose isomerase can be brought into contact with a bed or column of the composite so that the glucose isomerase activity thereof is increased again to the desired degree, Prior to regeneration, however, it is generally preferred to treat the 15 composite with a solution of alkali to make the ion exchange sites of the fibrous cellulose more readily available to isomerase adsorption. While we do not wish to be bound to any theory in regard to the mechanism involved, it is likely that substrate debris, denatured isomerase or other proteinaceous 20 materials which have become attracted to the fibrous cellulose are removed or solubilized. ;When fibrous cellulose is derivatized prior to agglomeration, the materials used in the derivatization reaction tend to cause the cellulose to swell or become partially solu-25 bilized and difficult to recover by filtration. Recovery of the composite of the present invention is simplified by the fact that such swelling as may occur does not present a serious filtration problem due to the granular nature of the derivatized product. Additionally, since the granular cellulose composites 30 do not suffer from serious packing problems, they can be utilized in deep bed reactors without difficulty and with a minimum of channeling occurring. ;35 ;-9- ;198572 ;1 Depending upon the specific gravity of the substratef the agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite may tend to float thereon and, therefore, there is the possibility of some loss of composite occuring through the inlet or outlet 5 portions of column type reactors. Moreover, problems could occur when the column is initially packed with the composite. Therefore, in certain cases, it is preferred to incorporate a densification agent into the agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite to increase the density thereof, 10 While a variety of densification agents may be util ized, they must, of course, be substantially inert in regard to the substrate and also must not inactivate the glucose isomerase. Densification agents such as powdered metal oxides or silicates or mixtures thereof may be utilized., 15 To form the agglomerated fibrous composite, the fibrous cellulose must be embedded in the hydrophobic polymer in such a manner that the cellulose is not completely encapsulated or enrobed in the polymer. Otherwise, the capacity of the fibrous ion exchange cellulose to adsorb enzymes would be deleteriously 20 affected. The greater the free surface of the cellulose, the greater the adsorptive capacity of the composite. ;While a number of methods may be utilized to embed the fibrous cellulose in the hydrophobic polymer, the two which may be typically used involve dissolving the hydrophobic polymer in 25 an organic solvent and incorporating the other materials therein, or heating the polymer to a plastic state and incorporating the other materials. The latter procedure is preferred since no solvent evaporation is necessary. The resulting material can then be reduced by grinding or the like, the granules classified 30 on appropriate sized screens,, and the agglomerated fibrous cellulose derivatized, ;The particle size distribution of the granules may vary somewhat widely. Satisfactory results have been obtained ;35 ;198572 ;1 using granules which passed through No. 20. and were retained on No. 60 U.S. mesh screens. ;In order to more clearly describe the nature of the present invention, specific examples will hereinafter be 5 described. It should be understood, however, that this is done solely by way of example and is intended neither to delineate the scope of the invention nor limit the ambit of the appended claims, ;10 ;15 ;20 ;25 ;30 ;35 ;-11- ;198572 ;1 EXAMPLE I ;This example illustrates the process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite ^ whereby the cellulose component of the composite is derivatized after agglomeration. ;An agglomerate was prepared by mixing 25 parts of chemical grade cellulose (C-100, manufactured by International Filler Corp., North Tonawanda, N.Y.) with 25 parts of alumina jq and compounding the mixture with 50 parts of polystyrene on a heated (180-200°C) twin roll compounder for a period of about 10 minutes. After cooling, the compounded composite was ground and sized to 40-100 mesh, ;220 grams of the sized composite was slurried in 616 ml of water containing 176 grams of Na2S04 an^ 26.4 grams of NaOH. The slurry was heated to 40°C following which 57.2 grams of a 50 percent aqueous solution of DEC was metered into the slurry with stirring at a rate of 0.7 ml min ^ over a period of about one hour. Next, another 26.4 grams of NaOH dissolved 2Q in 26 ml of water was added to the slurry followed by an additional 57.2 grams of the DEC solution at 0.7 ml min. ' ;The temperature of the slurry was then raised to 60°C and held at this temperature for 15 minutes. A volume of water approximately equal to the volume of the slurry was added and 2^ the composite recovered on a 60 mesh screen. The composite was washed on the screen with water and reslurried in a volume of water similar to that added previously. This slurry was adjusted to a pH of about 7 with HC1, washed and dewatered on filter paper and dried, ;The ion exchange capacity of the dried product was determined to be 0.84 meq g on a cellulose basis and 0.21 meq g~^" on the basis of the agglomerated composite, ;35 ;-12- ;1 98572 ;1 The ion exchange capacity of the composite was deter mined by the following procedure: ;1. Weigh 20g d.b. of derivatized agglomerated cellulose (5-10g cellulose basis). ;5 2. Slurry in water and adjust the pH to 12.5-13.0 with ;1-N NaOH. ;3. Wash the slurry into a chromatography column and place a porous disk on top of bed. ;4. Add approximately 10 ml of 1-N NaOH to column and 10 drain dropwise to disk level, rinse column with wash bottle and drain to disk. ;5. Wash with approximately 6 bed volumes of water using approximately 2 bed volumes per rinse. Allow head to drain down to top of disk for each rinse. ;15 6. Add 25 ml of 1-N HC1 to top of bed and rinse down with about 10 ml of water from wash bottle. Start fresh collection of effluent, dropwise, at about 1-1.5 ml/min. Rinse down with wash bottle as head level reaches disk. ;7. Wash with approximately 6 bed volumes as in ;20 Step 5. ;8. Titrate the effluent to pH 7.0 with 1-N NaOH. The ion exchange capacity was calculated as follows: ;I.E. Capacity (meg g d.b.) _ (ml HCL x N ) - (ml NaOH x N ) 25 gms adsorbent, d.b. ;In Example 1 it can be calculated that the ratio of derivatizing agent (DEC) to cellulose was 1.04 on a dry weight basis whereas in the prior art method described in U.S. Patent 4,110,164 the cellulose was derivatized before agglomeration 30 at a DEC to cellulose ratio of 0.7. This value represents approximately the maximum extent to which non-agglomerated cellulose can be derivatized and recovered without difficulty by conventional means. ;-13- ;198572 ;1 EXAMPLE II ;This example illustrates the process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite 5 wherein the cellulose is derivatized after agglomeration at a DEC to cellulose ratio of greater than two. ;An agglomerated composite, prepared as shown in Example I, was ground and sized to 40 to 80 mesh. 100 grams of the sized composite was slurried in 280 ml of water in 10 which had been dissolved 80 grams of Na^O^ and 24 grams of NaOH. With the slurry at a temperature of 40°C, 55 grams of a 50 percent DEC solution was metered thereinto with stirring at a rate of 0.5 ml min ^ over a period of about 1.5 hours. Additional NaOH (26 grams of a 50 percent solution) was then 15 added to the slurry and an additional 55 grams of the DEC ;solution was metered into the'slurry as in the first addition. The reaction mixture was heated to 60°C and held at this temperature for 15 minutes. A volume of water equal to the slurry volume was added and the diluted slurry dewatered and washed 20 on a 60 mesh screen. The product was reslurried in water, ;adjusted to a pH of from about 6.5 to 7.0 with HCL and screened and washed as above. ;The ion exchange capacity of the dried composite was determined by the method shown above to be 1.28 meq g on a 25 cellulose basis and 0.32 meq g on a composite basis. To achieve a comparable ion exchange capacity using the prior art method whereby derivatized DEAE-cellulose is agglomerated with polystyrene would require a degree of derivatization such as to render the cellulose gelatinous and difficult to recover, filter 30 and dry without expensive treatments such as the use of a solvent or salt solutions or crosslinking the cellulose. ;35 ;-14- ;198572 ;l ;EXAMPLE III ;This example illustrates the adsorptive capacity for glucose isomerase of the agglomerated fibrous ion exchange 5 cellulose composites hereinabove described and the composites described in the prior art and provides a comparison of the characteristics and functional properties of said composites. ;Glucose isomerase derived from microorganisms of a Streptomyces species, and having a potency of about 2 0 IGIU 10 ml-1 was added to equal weights of the composites prepared by the processes described in U.S. Patent 4,110,164 and in Examples I and II above. The enzyme/composite slurries were adjusted to pH 7 and stirred for 5 hours at a temperature of 25°C. The composites were recovered by filtration and the 15 amount of the enzyme adsorbed thereon determined by measuring the residual glucose isomerase activity in the respective filtrates by the method described by N.E. Lloyd et al. in Cereal Chem., Vol. 49(5), p. 544, 1972. ;The amounts of glucose isomerase adsorbed by the 20 individual composites and data illustrating certain functional characteristics of the same are set forth in Table I. ;25 ;Composite ;TABLE I ;Ratio (wt/wt) DEC:Cellulose ;Ion Exchange ;Adsorptive Capacity (IGIU g L) ;Example I Example II U.S. 4,110,164 ;1. 04 ;2.2 ;0,7 ;0.21 0.32 0.14 ;490 690 361 ;30 ;35 ;-15- ;198572 ;10 ;15 ;20 ;25 ;30 ;EXAMPLE IV ;This example illustrates the porosity characteristics of agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites prepared by the present process and compares the flow properties of said composites with those of a prior art composite and of certain unagglomerated fibrous cellulose products. ;The porosity characteristics of the following materials were determined: ;1. a&b. Crosslinked Whatman celluloses manufactured by W & R Balston Ltd., England. ;2. Non-crosslinked DEAE-cellulose (prepared as described in U.S. Patent 3,823,133). ;3. Composite prepared by agglomerating fibrous ion exchange cellulose and polystyrene (prepared as described in U.S. Patent 4,110,164). ;4. Composite prepared in Example I, above, ;5. Composite prepared in Example II, above. ;A porosity constant was determined for each of the above materials by the following procedure: ;15 to 75 grams of dry product was slurried in water and the slurry deaerated by stirring under vacuum for 15 minutes. A glass column (1.5 inches inside diameter, 18 inches high) fitted with a porous glass disc and a stopcock at the bottom was attached to a vacuum flask through a rubber stopper. The flask was in turn attached to a vacuum source. The deaerated slurry was poured into the column and a vacuum (12.3 p.s.i. below atmospheric pressure) was applied to the bottom of the column by opening the stopcock, thereby forming a bed of the material on the porous glass disk. Simultaneously, water was admitted at the top of the column to replace that removed by filtration so that ;35 ;1 9857 ;1 about 5 inches of water was maintained above the bed at all times. When a total of 1,000 ml of water had been collected, the stopcock was closed, the flask removed and the water emptied from the 5 flask. The flask was then reattached to the column, ;the vacuum reestablished, the stopcock opened and a measured quantity (1,000 to 3,000 ml) of water was filtered through the packed bed and collected. The time required to collect the water was deter-10 mined with a stop watch. The porosity constant was calculated using the following equation: K = (VH)/(TPA) ;Where: ;K = porosity constant (ml cm g ^ min "*") 15 V = volume of water collected (ml) H = height of packed bed (cm) T = time to collect the water (min) P = pressure drop across bed (g per square cm) A = cross section of bed (square cm) The results are shown in Table II.

TABLE II Porosity Constant (1) Material (ml cm g 1 min ^) 1 (a) 0.21 1 (b) 0.60 2 0.01 3 4.7 4 2.6 30 5 3.6 (1) a porosity constant of at least 1.5 ml cm g ^ min is considered necessary for satisfactory performance in a deep bed reactor. 1 9857 1 The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used by way of description and not of limitation since it is not intended by the use of said terms and expressions to exclude any equivalents of the features shown and described 5 or portions thereof and since it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the claimed invention.

- IB - 158572

Claims (18)

WHAT WE CLAIM IS;

1. A process for preparing an agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composite capable of adsorbing or binding charged macromolecules wherein a fibrous cellulose having ion exchange properties is agglomerated with a hydrophobic polymer which comprises first forming an agglomerate comprising a fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer and then derivatizing t.he agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose to impart ion exchange properties.thereto.

2. A process as in claim 1 wherein the charged mac-romolecule is an enzyme.

3. A process as in claim 1 or 2, wherein the agglomerated cellulose is derivatized to impart anion exchange properties thereto.

4. A process as in any one of claims 1-3, wherein the derivatized cellulose formed is DEAE-cellulose.

5. A process as in any one of.claims 1-4, wherein the hydrophobic polymer is selected from the group consisting Df melamine formaldehyde resins, epoxy resins and polystyrene.

6. A process as in any one of claims 1-5, wherein the composite has present a densification agent.

7. A process as in claim 6, wherein the densification agent is selected from the group consisting of powdered metal oxides, silicates and mixtures thereof. - 19 - - 198572

8. A process as in any one of claims 1-7, wherein. the agglomerate is prepared by compounding the cellulose with the polymer which has been heated to a plastic state.

9. A process as in any one of claims 1-7, wherein the agglomerate is prepared by forming a solution of the polymer in an organic solvent and then incorporating the cellulose therein.

10. A process as in any one of claims 1-9, wherein the composite is reduced to a particle size such that granules thereof will pass through a U.S. 20 mesh screen and be retained on a U.S. 60 mesh screen.

11. A process as in any one of claims 1-10, wherein the hydrophobic polymer is polystyrene.

12. A process as in any one of claims 1-11, wherein the j ion exchange capacity of the composite is at least 0.10 meq g 1 on the basis of the dried ion exchange cellulose composite.

13. A process as in any one of claims 1-11, wherein the ion exchange capacity of the composite is at least 0.20 meq g 1 on the basis of the dried ion exchange cellulose composite.

14. A process according to anyone of claims 1-13, wherein i the fibrous cellulose is embedded in the hydrophobic polymer. N.z.^ " " - f OCT 1984 REX:;.'. '"C" 20 196572

15. A process according to any one of claims 1-14, wherein the macromolecule is glucose isomerase.

16. An agglomerate of a fibrous cellulose and a hydrophobic polymer produced in accordance with claims 1-15.

17. A process for preparing agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites as claimed in claim 1 substantially as herein described with reference to the examples.

18. Agglomerated fibrous ion exchange cellulose composites as claimed in claim 16 substariially as herein described with reference to the examples. STANDARD^ BRANDS INCORPORATED fo