NL2029589B1 - Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters - Google Patents
Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NL2029589B1 NL2029589B1 NL2029589A NL2029589A NL2029589B1 NL 2029589 B1 NL2029589 B1 NL 2029589B1 NL 2029589 A NL2029589 A NL 2029589A NL 2029589 A NL2029589 A NL 2029589A NL 2029589 B1 NL2029589 B1 NL 2029589B1
- Authority
- NL
- Netherlands
- Prior art keywords
- source
- target area
- impact
- area
- source parameters
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/288—Event detection in seismic signals, e.g. microseismics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/30—Analysis
- G01V1/307—Analysis for determining seismic attributes, e.g. amplitude, instantaneous phase or frequency, reflection strength or polarity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/65—Source localisation, e.g. faults, hypocenters or reservoirs
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for identifying regional impact risk grade and region based on inversion of source parameters, which comprises the following steps: establishing a spatial coordinate system of a target area and screening mine 5 earthquake data; establishing the index system of hazard grade assessment; calculating the evaluation index value D; identifying the level of impact risk according to the index value D; determining the scope of impact risk and formulate preventive measures. According to the method; the earthquake source parameters are comprehensively utilized to predict the impact hazard level and the local area; and the 10 obtained results are convenient for field implementation.
Description
Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on
Inversion of Source Parameters
The invention relates to a method for judging the danger level and the local area of rock burst, in particular to a method for judging the regional danger level and the local area of rock burst based on inversion of seismic source parameters for underground microseismic monitoring in coal mines.
China's coal mining depth is increasing rapidly at a rate of 10-25m per year, which leads to a sharp increase in the stress level of the original rock around the mining space. In addition, the complexity of coal seam occurrence makes the coal rock dynamic disaster represented by rock burst one of the key factors hindering efficient coal mining. The prevention and control of rock burst, especially the accurate detection of impact dangerous areas, is one of the worldwide problems. Geophysical methods, represented by microseismic monitoring, can monitor the impact dangerous areas in real time and in a large scale, and the information can be transmitted in real time, thus realizing diversified and centralized processing with other early warning information, which has broad prospects in prevention and control of rock burst risk and prediction and early warning.
At present, scholars at home and abroad have put forward many microseismic early warning indicators, such as energy, frequency, time-space diffusion, apparent stress, apparent volume, spatial concentration, etc. However, these indicators realize early warning through abnormal changes of index values, such as "abnormal changes of index values" and "abnormal high or low values", which are only judged qualitatively, resulting in low prediction efficiency. In addition, active and passive CT inversion based on microseisms, which has developed rapidly in recent years, has achieved good results in the detection of impact dangerous areas, but its long inversion period, manual shooting, wiring (which leads to increased cost and labor intensity) and mutual interference with production have become one of the main problems restricting its development. At the same time, in some typical rock-burst mining areas in Poland and China, it has been observed that low-energy rock-burst (energy less than 10*]) often induces rock-burst events, while high-energy rock-burst (energy greater than 10*J) does not induce rock-burst events, which is one of the main problems that lead to an increase in the false alarm rate of monitoring and early warning. Therefore, it is of great significance to fully mine the source information and put forward a method to identify the impact risk level and region by integrating various sources.
In order to overcome the shortcomings of the prior art, the invention provides a method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters, which is a regional impact risk detection method which comprehensively utilizes the seismic source parameter information, quantitatively evaluates the impact risk degree and judges the local area of the impact risk.
To achieve the above purpose, the present invention provides a scheme including the following steps:
Sl, establishing a target area spatial coordinate system and screening mine earthquake data;
S2, establishing an index system for evaluating the impact risk level of the target area, which comprises a strength index Q and a dispersion index H;
S3, calculating the evaluation index value of the impact hazard level of the target pC area: H
S4, judging the impact risk level of the target area according to the evaluation index value D of the impact risk level of the target area, wherein the greater the value
D is, the higher the risk level is;
S5, judging the impact hazard range according to the nearest distance between the focal center and the roadway and the relationship between the focal center and the focal radius, and formulating preventive measures according to the hazard grade and the range of the target area.
Preferably, the steps of establishing the spatial coordinate system of the target area and screening the mine earthquake data in step SI are:
S1.1, selecting a source with energy greater than 100J as a target area, establishing a source bank and analyzing;
S1.2, according to the spatial position of the target area, selecting a reference point 0 (x. Vo Zo) as an origin to establish a spatial rectangular coordinate system Z;
S1.3. according to the relative position with reference point O, all the focal coordinates in the seismic source bank are converted from world coordinates to relative coordinates, and the coordinates of any focal point are expressed as (572).
S1.4 according to the spatial relative position of the roadway in the target area and the reference point o, the geometric expression of the roadway in the coordinate system Z is listed: ”? n P| where “7/0 is the coordinate component of the coordinate (x Yo 2) of any point at the beginning and end of the roadway in the coordinate system Z, and m,n; p’ is the spatial direction vector of the roadway.
Preferably, the method for calculating the intensity index Q in step S2 is: ‚ | Vise
Q,=2. wh, W/'= Vv Vico i=1 | e J > Vi i in which, Q is the Q value of the intensity index of the j-th source in the source bank, "i is the prediction weight of the i-th source parameter in the source bank,
VP is the ith source parameter value of the j-th source in the source bank, where 1, 2 and 3 represent seismic moment, radiation energy and apparent stress respectively,
€ is the average value of the i-th source parameter of the j-th source in the source bank, and n is the total number of source parameter types used.
Preferably, the method for calculating the dispersion index H in step S2 is as follows: n
U= >" wyuy U>l
H _ ea ‘ U=1U<1 in which "7 is the prediction weight of correlation relation of source parameters, “i is the dispersion degree between pairwise corresponding source parameters,
Uy = 7 ds © which satisfies the relation Uus where x and y are a set of corresponding source parameter types, g(x) is a set of fitted correlation relation of source parameters, Um is a set of dispersion limit between source parameters, and n is the logarithm of source parameters used.
Preferably, the source parameters include seismic moment, radiation energy, apparent stress and source radius, which are calculated by Brune model.
Preferably, when solving the source parameters, the particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to solve the zero frequency limit Ay and the corner frequency Jo, and finally the source parameters are determined.
Preferably, in step S5, the specific scheme for formulating preventive measures according to the statistical regional danger level and the local area is as follows: when the impact danger level of the corresponding area is A, the roadway impact danger area does not need to carry out pressure relief work, but only needs to strengthen the detection of the target area; when the impact hazard level of the corresponding area is B, the roadway impact hazard area needs to be relieved and the detection of the target area should be strengthened; when the impact hazard level of the corresponding area is C, the personnel near the dangerous area shall be evacuated immediately, and the pressure relief work shall 5 be carried out after a certain period of time; when the dangerous areas of roadway judged by different danger levels coincide, the higher one shall prevail.
The method disclosed by the invention has the beneficial effects that the coal mine microseismic data are deeply excavated, so that the impact danger area and the danger grade can be quickly and accurately predicted, and relevant measures are taken in advance according to the prediction result, so that the impact danger in the area is reduced, and the operation safety of personnel is guaranteed; according to microseismic data, the danger zone is calculated in real time, which meets the needs of dynamic early warning of mine impact danger and meets the requirements of intelligent development of coal mines. The earthquake source parameters are comprehensively used to predict the impact hazard level and the local area, and the obtained results are convenient for on-site implementation, and the method established by the invention also has the characteristics of clear physical meaning and suitability for programming to realize intelligence.
In order to explain the embodiments of the present invention or the technical scheme 1n the prior art more clearly, the following will briefly introduce the drawings used in the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for ordinary technicians in the field, other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without paying creative labor.
Figure 1 is a waveform record of each microseismic station corresponding to a source in the source library of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a plan view of the mining project in the target area of the present invention; in which ©) is working face, (2) is transport chute, (3) is return air chute;
Figure 3 is a spatial coordinate system of the target area of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a graph showing the statistical relationship between source parameters of the present invention;
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the layout of microseismic stations in the target area of the present invention; in which ©) is risk grade A, ©) is risk grade B, ©D) isrisk grade C, © is headentry, © is working face, {9 is tailentry, 1 is radius of hypocenter.
The following will clearly and completely describe the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of them. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in the field without creative labor belong to the scope of protection of the present invention.
In order to make the above objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the present invention will be further explained in detail with reference to the drawings and specific embodiments.
Several microseismic events monitored during mining in 250105-1 working face of Yanbei Coal Mine, Gansu Province are selected for calculation. The waveform records of microseismic stations are shown in Figure 1. The plan of mining engineering in the target area is shown in Figure 2. (1) Establish the spatial model and spatial coordinate system of the target area as shown in Figure 3, and screen the mine earthquake data as follows: a, select the sources with energy greater than 100J in the target area to establish an analysis source bank; b, according to the spatial position of the target area, select the reference point 0 (x. Vo Zo) as the origin to establish a spatial rectangular coordinate system Z;
c‚ according to the relative position with reference point o, all the focal coordinates in the seismic source bank are converted from world coordinates to relative coordinates, and the coordinates of any seismic source can be expressed as (x,,V,Z;). d, according to the spatial relative position of the roadway in the target area and the reference point o, the geometric expression of the roadway in the coordinate system Z can be listed: n P where Xr Vr? is the coordinate component of the coordinate (x, ’ 2) of any point at the beginning and end of the roadway in the coordinate system Z, and m,n, D is the spatial direction vector of the roadway. (2) Establish an index system for evaluating the impact risk level of the target area, including strength index Q and dispersion index H; the calculation method of strength index Q is: ‚ I Vive — WJ j_ 072 ww, W, ie Vi cel in which, Q is the intensity index Q value of the jth source in the source library,
Wi is the prediction weight of the ith source parameter in the source library, and vi is the ith source parameter value of the jth source in the source library, where 1, 2 and 3 represent the seismic moment, radiation energy and apparent stress respectively, ei is the average value of the i-th source parameter of the j-th source in the source library, and n is the total number of source parameter types used.
The calculation method of dispersion index H is:
A
U= > wy UU >1 i=1,/=1
H={ ©
U=1,U<1 . . Wy . ee . . . in which, is the prediction weight of correlation relation of source parameters,
U; . oo ¥ is the dispersion degree between pairwise corresponding source parameters, yg, (x) : WT which satisfies the relation “mx where x and y are a group of gi (x) : corresponding source parameter types, is a group of fitted correlation relation u Ce of source parameters, Ymax is a group of dispersion limit between source parameters, and n is the logarithm of source parameters used. When there is historical training . p. w,, . : 7 data, the weights ”: and "7 are determined by using the prediction efficiency scoring method, and when there is no historical training data, the parameter values ; W,
Wi and / are equal.
In the process of calculating the dispersion index H, when calculating the . . U, - . . . u ‚ . . dispersion and dispersion limit “wax between source parameters, it is necessary to obtain the statistical relationship between a certain pair of source parameters as shown in Figure 4. According to this statistical relationship, the dispersion limit max . . ou can be obtained, and the dispersion # can be further calculated.
The seismic source parameters include seismic moment, radiation energy and apparent stress, which are calculated by Brune model:
Ampv FA _ 0 ee M, = 0 seismic moment: < in which, © is rock density, V is propagation speed of P wave or S wave, ” is . . A, ne . distance between source and station, ° is zero frequency limit of source, and Q is radiation factor of P wave or S wave (P wave is 0.52, S wave is 0.63),
U ' £ ! Us : 6 ’
E, =4mpv r* We) | i 0) di + 4mpv r? Vl ( dt radiation energy: Ph 5 in which is rock density, ° and VS are propagation velocity of P wave or S a U Ui wave respectively, r is distance between source and station, and S$ are source ee U, U; ij: : radiation terms respectively, | / n) and | ) are average values of Up and Us on source sphere respectively, and 4 and ft are starting point and ending point of P wave and S wave in time domain waveform respectively.
E. 0,=T ~
M, apparent stress: in which 7 is the shear modulus of rock mass at the earthquake source, E, is a M, . _. radiation energy of vibration wave and 1s seismic moment.
Use Brune model to calculate the focal radius: 234, Of I
F. “nr in which “¢ indicates the corner frequency of the seismic source
Af, and "Fis the P wave velocity.
Further, the source parameter value is finally determined according to the following formula: ¥=¢ ‚in which Pis the average value of some source mechanical parameters of the source; "is the focal mechanics parameter of each station and # is the total number of stations participating in the calculation.
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is used to solve the zero frequency limit A, and corner frequency h. and the residual error between the theoretical value and the actual value in the iterative process is calculated by the following formula (when the residual error meets the conditions, the iteration is stopped):
EE
GETS
MES, in which “ indicates the residual error between the i-th theoretical source spectrum and the actual source spectrum; k is the theoretical source spectrum when i-th Jo and A, are adopted; Si is the actual source spectrum. (3) Calculate the evaluation index value of the impact risk level of the target area . ) according to the following formula: D= 2 : (4) Judging the impact risk level of the target area according to the evaluation index value D of the impact risk level of the target area, and the greater the value D, the higher the risk level. (5) According to the distance between the fracture radius of the source and the roadway, judge the boundary of impact danger, count the regional danger level and boundary, and formulate preventive measures.
The specific scheme is as follows: when D <05, the danger level is A, and the corresponding area 1s weak impact danger level. At this time, there is no need to carry out pressure relief work in the roadway impact danger area, only need to strengthen the monitoring of the target area; when 05D <0.75, the hazard level is B, and the corresponding area is of medium impact hazard level. At this time, pressure relief work should be carried out in the hazardous area, and monitoring should be strengthened.
When 220.75 the hazard level is C, and the corresponding area is of strong impact hazard level. At this time, people near the hazardous area should be evacuated immediately, and pressure relief work should be carried out after a certain period of time as shown in figure 5.
When the dangerous areas of roadway judged by different danger levels coincide, the higher one shall prevail.
A total of 27 seismic sources in the screened target area are shown in Table 1:
Table 1
Zero . a. .
Corner Seismic Radiation | Apparent | Radius of
Hypocenter frequency em EE frre mn A 6 /2160 |2.85E-06 |3.67E+12 | 1.ISE+0S |2.49E+02 [38.48 8 21.76 | 5.05E06 |7.21E+12 | 3.93E+04 | 127E+02 [3820 9 [2862 [109B05 | L65E+13 | 143E+05 | 5.55E+01 [29.04
The above embodiments only describe the preferred mode of the invention, but do not limit the scope of the invention. On the premise of not departing from the design spirit of the invention, various modifications and improvements made by ordinary technicians in the field to the technical scheme of the invention shall fall within the protection scope determined by the claims of the invention.
1. A method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters is characterized by comprising the following steps:
S1, establishing a target area spatial coordinate system and screening mine earthquake data;
S2, establishing an index system for evaluating the impact risk level of the target area, which comprises a strength index Q and a dispersion index H;
S3, calculating the evaluation index value of the impact hazard level of the target pC area: H
S4, judging the impact risk level of the target area according to the evaluation index value D of the impact risk level of the target area, wherein the greater the value
D is, the higher the risk level is;
SS, judging the impact hazard range according to the nearest distance between the focal center and the roadway and the relationship between the focal center and the focal radius, and formulating preventive measures according to the hazard grade and the range of the target area. 2. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 1 is characterized in that the steps of establishing the spatial coordinate system of the target area and screening the mine earthquake data in S1 are as follows:
S1.1, selecting a source with energy greater than 100J as a target area, establishing a source bank and analyzing;
S1.2, according to the spatial position of the target area, selecting a reference point ACY as an origin to establish a spatial rectangular coordinate system Z,
S1.3. according to the relative position with reference point O, all the focal coordinates in the seismic source bank are converted from world coordinates to relative coordinates, and the coordinates of any focal point are expressed as (5.32),
S1.4 according to the spatial relative position of the roadway in the target area and the reference point o, the geometric expression of the roadway in the coordinate
X-x, JJ, ZZ, ic 1 om np Xp V2, ; : system Z is listed: , where ‘7’? + is the coordinate (x ‚Vz ) oo component of the coordinate * 7’ // of any point at the beginning and end of the roadway in the coordinate system Z, and m,n, p is the spatial direction vector of the roadway. 3. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 1 is characterized in that the method for calculating the intensity index Q in step S2 is as follow: 1 Vire! fn | 3
Q;7), WW W/=i Vi Co
Coe — JV <¢ i=l 7 > Vi i € in which, Q is the Q value of the intensity index of the j-th source in the source bank, ": is the prediction weight of the i-th source parameter in the source bank,
Vi! is the ith source parameter value of the j-th source in the source bank, where 1, 2 and 3 represent seismic moment, radiation energy and apparent stress respectively, ¢/ is the average value of the i-th source parameter of the j-th source in the source bank, and n 1s the total number of source parameter types used. 4. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 1 is characterized in that the method for calculating the dispersion index H in step S2 is as follow:
U= > wy; U>1 i=l j=1
H — i#f + among them, Wi is the prediction weight of correlation relation of source parameters, “i is the dispersion degree between pairwise corresponding source parameters, which satisfies the relation Umax where x and y are a set of corresponding source parameter types, g(x) is a set of fitted correlation relation of source parameters, Una js a set of dispersion limit between source parameters, and n is the logarithm of source parameters used. 5. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 3 is characterized in that the source parameters include seismic moment, radiation energy, apparent stress and source radius, which are calculated by Brune model. 6. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 3 is characterized in that when solving the source parameters, the particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to solve the zero frequency limit A and the corner frequency h. and finally the source parameters are determined. 7. The method for judging the regional impact risk grade and the local area based on the inversion of the seismic source parameters according to embodiment 1 is characterized in that in step S5, the specific scheme for formulating preventive measures according to the statistical regional danger level and the local area is as follows: when the impact danger level of the corresponding area is A, the roadway impact danger area does not need to carry out pressure relief work, but only needs to strengthen the detection of the target area. when the impact hazard level of the corresponding area is B, the roadway impact hazard area needs to be relieved and the detection of the target area should be strengthened; when the impact hazard level of the corresponding area is C, the personnel near the dangerous area shall be evacuated immediately, and the pressure relief work shall be carried out after a certain period of time; when the dangerous areas of roadway judged by different danger levels coincide, the higher one shall prevail.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029589A NL2029589B1 (en) | 2021-11-02 | 2021-11-02 | Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029589A NL2029589B1 (en) | 2021-11-02 | 2021-11-02 | Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NL2029589B1 true NL2029589B1 (en) | 2023-06-01 |
Family
ID=86548173
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029589A NL2029589B1 (en) | 2021-11-02 | 2021-11-02 | Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
NL (1) | NL2029589B1 (en) |
-
2021
- 2021-11-02 NL NL2029589A patent/NL2029589B1/en active
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20230152479A1 (en) | Physics-based and data-driven integrated method for rock burst hazard assessment | |
Wang et al. | Risk Assessment of Water Inrush in Karst Tunnels Based on the Efficacy Coefficient Method. | |
Kabiesz et al. | Application of rule-based models for seismic hazard prediction in coal mines. | |
Zhang et al. | Risk identification for coal and gas outburst in underground coal mines: A critical review and future directions | |
Bakhtavar et al. | Toward predicting blast-induced flyrock: a hybrid dimensional analysis fuzzy inference system | |
Wang et al. | AdaBoost-driven multi-parameter real-time warning of rock burst risk in coal mines | |
Hao et al. | Quantification of margins and uncertainties for the risk of water inrush in a karst tunnel: representations of epistemic uncertainty with probability | |
CN115577844A (en) | Multi-parameter advanced prediction method for coal mine rock burst | |
CN116044501A (en) | Advanced geological forecast dynamic monitoring and early warning system and method | |
Xiao et al. | Hazard degree identification and coupling analysis of the influencing factors on goafs | |
Xu et al. | Risk assessment of coal mine gas explosion based on cloud integrated similarity and fuzzy DEMATEL | |
CN112379425A (en) | Regional impact hazard level and/30043territory identification method based on seismic source parameter inversion | |
Zhou et al. | Evaluation of rock burst intensity based on annular grey target decision-making model with variable weight | |
NL2029589B1 (en) | Identification Method of Regional Impact Risk Grade and Region Based on Inversion of Source Parameters | |
Chen et al. | A new evaluation method for slope stability based on TOPSIS and MCS | |
Liu et al. | Cluster analysis of moment tensor solutions and its application to rockburst risk assessment in underground coal mines | |
Zou et al. | Intelligent Control of Smooth Blasting Quality in Rock Tunnels Using BP‐ANN, ENN, and ANFIS | |
Wang et al. | Risk assessment and online forewarning of oil & gas storage and transportation facilities based on data mining | |
Zhang et al. | Risk assessment of coal and gas outburst in driving face based on finite interval cloud model | |
Li et al. | Research status and development trends of mine floor water inrush grade prediction | |
Xue et al. | A method to predict rockburst using temporal trend test and its application | |
CN116070907A (en) | Karst collapse susceptibility assessment method and system based on analytic hierarchy process | |
CN113374525A (en) | Coal and gas outburst danger area identification comprehensive early warning method based on multi-parameter data fusion | |
Elmo et al. | Can new technologies shake the empirical foundations of rock engineering? | |
Li et al. | Risk Assessment of Building Foundation Pit Construction Based on Fuzzy Hierarchical Comprehensive Evaluation Method |