NL2029158B1 - Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry - Google Patents
Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NL2029158B1 NL2029158B1 NL2029158A NL2029158A NL2029158B1 NL 2029158 B1 NL2029158 B1 NL 2029158B1 NL 2029158 A NL2029158 A NL 2029158A NL 2029158 A NL2029158 A NL 2029158A NL 2029158 B1 NL2029158 B1 NL 2029158B1
- Authority
- NL
- Netherlands
- Prior art keywords
- wolfberry
- content
- leaves
- salt tolerance
- evaluating
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000015784 hyperosmotic salinity response Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 235000015459 Lycium barbarum Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 62
- 235000015468 Lycium chinense Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 62
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 244000241838 Lycium barbarum Species 0.000 title claims abstract 18
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-HWKXXFMVSA-N jasmonic acid Chemical compound CC\C=C/C[C@@H]1[C@@H](CC(O)=O)CCC1=O ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-HWKXXFMVSA-N 0.000 claims description 60
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N (+)-Abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\[C@@]1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N 0.000 claims description 38
- ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-UHFFFAOYSA-N jasmonic acid Natural products CCC=CCC1C(CC(O)=O)CCC1=O ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 30
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 27
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 20
- FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N desoxyabscisic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=C(C)C=CC1C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 19
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 18
- HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chloroform Chemical compound ClC(Cl)Cl HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910021642 ultra pure water Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000012498 ultrapure water Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011573 trace mineral Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 claims description 4
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000003722 vitamin derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000861 blow drying Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000589 high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010813 internal standard method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003260 vortexing Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 44
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 244000241872 Lycium chinense Species 0.000 description 86
- 241000169546 Lycium ruthenicum Species 0.000 description 39
- YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N salicylic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1O YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 30
- WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetonitrile Chemical compound CC#N WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 27
- 229960004889 salicylic acid Drugs 0.000 description 16
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 16
- FJKROLUGYXJWQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N papa-hydroxy-benzoic acid Natural products OC(=O)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 FJKROLUGYXJWQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 15
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 14
- JZNWSCPGTDBMEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerophosphorylethanolamin Natural products NCCOP(O)(=O)OCC(O)CO JZNWSCPGTDBMEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- AWUCVROLDVIAJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-glycerophosphate Natural products OCC(O)COP(O)(O)=O AWUCVROLDVIAJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 150000008104 phosphatidylethanolamines Chemical class 0.000 description 8
- FROLUYNBHPUZQU-IIZJPUEISA-N (2R,3R,4S,5R)-2-(hydroxymethyl)-6-[3-[3-[(3R,4S,5R,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxypropoxy]propoxy]oxane-3,4,5-triol Chemical compound OC[C@H]1OC(OCCCOCCCOC2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O FROLUYNBHPUZQU-IIZJPUEISA-N 0.000 description 7
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000007226 seed germination Effects 0.000 description 7
- UFTFJSFQGQCHQW-UHFFFAOYSA-N triformin Chemical compound O=COCC(OC=O)COC=O UFTFJSFQGQCHQW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 235000014113 dietary fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 229930195729 fatty acid Natural products 0.000 description 6
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 150000004665 fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N methanoic acid Natural products OC=O BDAGIHXWWSANSR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 2-cis-abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\C1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- RYCNUMLMNKHWPZ-SNVBAGLBSA-N 1-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine Chemical compound CC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)COP([O-])(=O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C RYCNUMLMNKHWPZ-SNVBAGLBSA-N 0.000 description 4
- WRGQSWVCFNIUNZ-GDCKJWNLSA-N 1-oleoyl-sn-glycerol 3-phosphate Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)COP(O)(O)=O WRGQSWVCFNIUNZ-GDCKJWNLSA-N 0.000 description 4
- QUZHZFAQJATMCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Monogalactosyldiglyceride Natural products CCC=CCC=CCC=CCCCCCCCC(=O)OCC(OC(=O)CCCCCCCC=CCC=CCC=CCC)COC1OC(CO)C(O)C(O)C1O QUZHZFAQJATMCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- ATBOMIWRCZXYSZ-XZBBILGWSA-N [1-[2,3-dihydroxypropoxy(hydroxy)phosphoryl]oxy-3-hexadecanoyloxypropan-2-yl] (9e,12e)-octadeca-9,12-dienoate Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OCC(COP(O)(=O)OCC(O)CO)OC(=O)CCCCCCC\C=C\C\C=C\CCCCC ATBOMIWRCZXYSZ-XZBBILGWSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 4
- WTJKGGKOPKCXLL-RRHRGVEJSA-N phosphatidylcholine Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP([O-])(=O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C)OC(=O)CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC WTJKGGKOPKCXLL-RRHRGVEJSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- -1 sulphoquinovosyl Chemical group 0.000 description 4
- OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(3-methoxyphenyl)aniline Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(C=2C=CC(N)=CC=2)=C1 OSWFIVFLDKOXQC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000019253 formic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium acetate Chemical compound N.CC(O)=O USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005695 Ammonium acetate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019257 ammonium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229940043376 ammonium acetate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010828 elution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001819 mass spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000008223 sterile water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004704 ultra performance liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- PORPENFLTBBHSG-MGBGTMOVSA-N 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(O)(O)=O)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC PORPENFLTBBHSG-MGBGTMOVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- TZCPCKNHXULUIY-RGULYWFUSA-N 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)OC[C@H](COP(O)(=O)OC[C@H](N)C(O)=O)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC TZCPCKNHXULUIY-RGULYWFUSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-DNJMNUPXSA-N C(\C(\C(=C(\[C@@]1(O)C(C[2H])=CC(=O)CC1(C)C)/[2H])\[2H])=C\C(O)=O)([2H])([2H])[2H] Chemical compound C(\C(\C(=C(\[C@@]1(O)C(C[2H])=CC(=O)CC1(C)C)/[2H])\[2H])=C\C(O)=O)([2H])([2H])[2H] JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-DNJMNUPXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-VVKOMZTBSA-N Dideuterium Chemical class [2H][2H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-VVKOMZTBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZWZWYGMENQVNFU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerophosphorylserin Natural products OC(=O)C(N)COP(O)(=O)OCC(O)CO ZWZWYGMENQVNFU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005708 Sodium hypochlorite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010811 Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- CWRILEGKIAOYKP-SSDOTTSWSA-M [(2r)-3-acetyloxy-2-hydroxypropyl] 2-aminoethyl phosphate Chemical compound CC(=O)OC[C@@H](O)COP([O-])(=O)OCCN CWRILEGKIAOYKP-SSDOTTSWSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000002250 absorbent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002745 absorbent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012271 agricultural production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- RCTYPNKXASFOBE-UHFFFAOYSA-M chloromercury Chemical compound [Hg]Cl RCTYPNKXASFOBE-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000011869 dried fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000024346 drought recovery Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003054 hormonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001665 lethal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001294 liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012074 organic phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003905 phosphatidylinositols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004451 qualitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003626 triacylglycerols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000004724 ultra fast liquid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
- A01G7/00—Botany in general
- A01G7/06—Treatment of growing trees or plants, e.g. for preventing decay of wood, for tingeing flowers or wood, for prolonging the life of plants
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01C—PLANTING; SOWING; FERTILISING
- A01C1/00—Apparatus, or methods of use thereof, for testing or treating seed, roots, or the like, prior to sowing or planting
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Ecology (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
The disclosure discloses a method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry, which relates to the field of the adversity adaptability evaluation of wolfberry. In the method, the seedlings of wolfberry are treated with salt stress and without salt stress, the leaves of the seedlings are taken for lipid molecules detection and analysis. The type number and/or content of lipid molecules in the salt stress treatment group that have significantly changed compared to the no salt stress treatment group are used as the evaluation index of salt tolerance. The analysis of lipid molecule content can accurately reflect the salt tolerance level between different wolfberry varieties, which has important guiding significance for the breeding of stress tolerance of wolfberry and has wide application prospects in the promotion of vegetation recovery, desertification prevention and saline-alkali land utilization.
Description
METHOD FOR EVALUATING SALT TOLERANCE OF WOLFBERRRY Technical Field The present disclosure relates to the field of the adversity adaptability evaluation of wolfberry, especially relates to a method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry. Background Wolfberry, a perennial deciduous shrub, belongs to the medicinal and food homologous species, distributes in Ningxia, Gansu, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Tibet and other regions of China. The fruits and leaves of wolfberry contain rich nutrients and effective substances, which are commonly used Chinese medicinal materials and also very important health-care products. The research on the breeding, planting and functional components of wolfberry has been widely concerned in recent years.
Saline-alkali soil refers to the soil with a large amount of soluble salt under the action of natural factors and human factors. At present, soil salinization is a key factor that restricts agricultural production and economic development. Wolfberry is a plant with strong saline-alkali resistance and drought tolerance, and is suitable for planting in saline-alkali, drought and deserts. Wolfberry is one of the pioneer tree species for vegetation recovery, desertification prevention and saline-alkali land utilization in northwest China. It is of great practical significance to improve the growth state of wolfberry under the extreme environment such as saline-alkali land, and to cultivate and select the varieties with high salt tolerance.
The adverse effects of excessive soluble salt in soil on plants are referred to as salt damage, and the tolerance capacity of plants to salt damage is called salt tolerance. Currently, it is commonly used in the prior art to evaluate the salt tolerance of different varieties of wolfberry by observing the growth states of seedlings and the seed germination rate under different salt stress conditions. Although the differences in salt tolerance of different varieties of wolfberry by the above methods can be visually displayed, the evaluation of salt tolerance of wolfberry is relatively rough and lacks accurate analysis.
Summary The present disclosure provides a new evaluation method of salt tolerance of wolfberry, so as to solve the defects that the method for evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry in the prior art is relatively rough and lacks accurate analysis.
The present disclosure provides a method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry, the seedlings of wolfberry are respectively treated with salt stress (adding NaCl} and without salt stress (not adding NaCl), the leaves of the seedlings are taken for lipid molecules detection and analysis. The number and/or content of lipid molecules in the salt stress treatment group that have significantly changed compared to the no salt stress treatment group are used as the evaluation index of salt tolerance.
Specifically, the method includes: Cutting the seedlings of wolfberry varieties to be evaluated in the culture medium without NaCl and the culture medium with NaCl for cultivation, which are respectively the control group and the experimental group. The culture medium is a MS culture medium, containing 4.23¢g/L of macro elements, 85.29mg/L of trace elements and 103.1mg/L of vitamin; taking the leaves of cultured seedlings in the control group and the experimental group to detect the content of lipid molecules in the leaves, and obtaining the types of lipid molecules with significant content changes in the experimental group, compared with the control group. The content of lipid molecules in leaves was detected by the following steps: (1) taking the powder of the ground leaves and adding into the preheated isopropyl alcohol, heating, then adding the full-fat internal standard, chloroform and ultra-pure water, swirling, centrifuging, and taking the first supernatant; (2) adding the mixture of chloroform and methanol (containing BHT) into the remaining liquid after the first supernatant is taken in step (1), swirling, centrifuging, and taking the second supernatant; (3) mixing the first supernatant and the second supernatant, then adding KCI in it, swirling, centrifuging, and taking the subnatant, blow-drying with nitrogen, re-dissolving with isopropyl alcohol, and filtering to obtain a to-be-tested solution; evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry according to the number and/or content of lipid molecules with significant changes in content, wherein, the fewer the type number of lipid molecules with significant changes in content, the less the change in content, the higher the salt tolerance of wolfberry.
The method further comprises: taking the leaves of cultured seedlings of the control group and the experimental group, and detecting the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves; evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry according to the significance of changes in the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves of the experimental group compared with the control group, wherein, the more significant the content change of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid, the higher the salt tolerance of wolfberry.
The present disclosure has the following advantages:
1. In the evaluation method of salt tolerance of wolfberry provided by the present disclosure, the seedlings of wolfberry are respectively treated with salt stress (adding NaCl) and without salt stress (not adding NaCl), the leaves of the seedlings are taken for lipid molecules detection and analysis. The number and/or content of lipid molecules in the salt stress treatment group that have significantly changed compared to the no salt stress treatment group are used as the evaluation index of salt tolerance. The analysis of lipid molecule content based on salt stress treatment and no salt stress treatment can accurately reflect the salt tolerance level between different wolfberry varieties, which has important guiding significance for the breeding of stress tolerance of wolfberry and has wide application prospects in the promotion of vegetation recovery, desertification prevention and saline-alkali land utilization in northwest China.
2. This evaluation method further comprises the steps of evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry using abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid. By using the significant changes in the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves of the salt stress treatment group relative to the no salt stress treatment group as the evaluation index of salt tolerance, which can assist in the analysis of the salt tolerance between different wolfberry varieties. It is beneficial to provide further guidance for the adversity resistance breeding of wolfberry. Brief Description of Fig.s In order to more clearly explain the specific embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following will make a brief introduction of the drawings needed in the specific embodiments or prior art. It is obviously that the attached drawings in the following description are part embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings based on these drawings can be obtained on the basis of the following drawings without creative work.
Fig. 1 is a comparison diagram of the number of lipid molecules types in the experimental group and the control group in Embodiment 1 of the present disclosure; Fig. 2 is a comparison diagram of the number of lipid molecules under different lipid subgroups in the experimental group and the control group in Embodiment 1 of the present disclosure; Fig. 3 is a graph showing changes in the content of different lipid molecules in experimental group 1 and control group 1 in Embodiment 1 of the present disclosure; Fig. 4 is a graph showing changes in the content of different lipid molecules in experimental group 2 and the control group 2 in Embodiment 1 of the present disclosure; Fig. 5 is a comparison diagram of ABA content in the experimental groups and the control groups in Embodiment 2 of the present disclosure; Fig. 6 is a comparison diagram of JA content in the experimental groups and the control groups in Embodiment 2 of the present disclosure; Fig. 7 is a comparison diagram of SA content in the experimental groups and the control groups in Embodiment 2 of the present disclosure; Fig. 8 is a comparison diagram of the growth states of seedlings under different salt stress conditions in Embodiment 3 of the present disclosure; Fig. 9 is a trend chart of the germination rate in the experimental groups and the control groups over time in Embodiment 4 of the present disclosure; Fig. 10 is a scale chart of the germination rate in the experimental groups and the control groups on the 24th day of culture in Embodiment 4 of the present disclosure. Detailed Description The following embodiments are provided for a better understanding of the present disclosure. They are not limited to the best embodiment, and do not limit the content and protection scope of the present disclosure. Any product identical or similar to the present disclosure obtained under the inspiration of the disclosure or by combining the features of present disclosure and other prior art, falls within the protection scope of the present disclosure.
The MS culture medium used in the embodiments was purchased from Rishui Biology Co., LTD. The formula was as follows: macro elements (constant elements) 4.23¢/L, trace elements
85.29mg/L, vitamin 103.1mg/L.
Abscisic acid internal standard used in the embodiments: [2H6]-abscisic acid; jasmonic acid internal standard: [2H5]-jasmonic acid; salicylic acid internal standard:[2H4]-salicylic acid; they were all purchased from Shanghai Zhenzhun Bio- technology Co., LTD.
The full-fat internal standard used in the embodiments was a mixture of thirteen internal standards of heavy-hydrogen lipids, with each concentration is 100 pg/mL, purchased from Avanti Corporation, and the Product Number is 330731-1EA.
It can be carried out according to the conventional experimental steps described in the literature in this art if the specific experimental steps or conditions are not indicated in the embodiments. The raw materials or instruments used are all commercially available conventional products, including but not limited to the raw materials or instruments used in the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Embodiment 1 Lipid analysis was used to evaluate the salt tolerance of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum, the method is as follows: (1) Fresh twigs {branches without lignification, cut from wolfberry trees in spring) were cut from Lycium Chinese trees and Lycium Ruthenicum trees. The length of the twigs was about 8 cm. The twigs were disinfected with mercury (0.01% mercury chloride) in an ultra-clean workbench, washed with sterile water and aired, and then cut in MS culture medium to culture for 3 weeks in the greenhouse (photoperiod was 10h light and 14h dark, temperature was 25°C, humidity was 50%). Then the twigs were cut again into about 5 cm in length for aseptic propagation in an ultra-clean workbench. The seedlings with the same stem diameter on the twigs about 5 cm in length were cut for subsequent operations.
(2) The seedlings of Lycium Chinese obtained in step (1) were respectively cut in MS culture medium without NaCl and MS culture medium with NaCl (NaCl concentration was 150mmol/L) to culture for 21 days in the greenhouse {photoperiod was 10h light and 14h dark, temperature was 25°C, humidity was 50%), as control group 1 (LC-mock) and experimental group 1 (LC-NaCl). The seedlings of Lycium Ruthenicum obtained in step (1) were respectively cut in MS culture medium without NaCl and MS culture medium with NaCl (NaCl concentration was 150mmol/L) to 5 cluture for 21 days in the greenhouse (photoperiod was 10h light and 14h dark, temperature was 25°C, humidity was 50%), as control group 2 (LR-mock) and experimental group 2 (LR-NaCl). The leaves of the seedlings of the above groups were cut from the petioles and were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored in a refrigerator at -80°C for later use. The content of lipid molecules in the leaves was detected: the leaves pre-frozen in the refrigerator at -80°C were added with liquid nitrogen, and then ground into uniform powder; 20 mg powder was weighed and added with 3mL of isopropyl alcohol preheated to 75°C, heated for 15 min, added with 100 LL of full-fat internal standard with a concentration of 10 ug/mL, 1.5mL chloroform and 0.6mL ultra-pure water, swirled for 1h, centrifuged, and the first supernatant was taken. After the first supernatant was taken, the remaining liquid was added with 4 mL of the mixture of chloroform and methanol (containing 0.01%BHT) with a volume ratio of 2:1, swirled for 30 min, centrifuged, and the second supernatant was taken, the above steps were repeated for three times, the extracting solution was obtained by mixing the first supernatant and the second supernatant, 1mL of KCI with a concentration of 1 mol/L was added into the extracting solution, swirled for 1h, centrifuged, then the subnatant was taken and blown dried with nitrogen, re- dissolved with 1 mL of isopropyl alcohol, and filtered with 0.22 um organic filter membrane to obtain a to-be-tested solution. (3) Instrument detection: an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was adopted, wherein, chromatography system: Shimadzu UPLC LC-30A; chromatographic column: Phenomenex Kinetics C18 column (100 x 2.1 mm, 2.6 ym); injection volume: 1 pL; flow rate: 0.4 mL/min; column temperature: 60°C; temperature of a sample chamber: 4°C; Mobile phase A: a mixture of water, methanol and acetonitrile with a volume ratio of 1: 1: 1, containing 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate; mobile phase B phase: a mixture of isopropyl alcohol and acetonitrile with a volume ratio of 5: 1, containing 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate; gradient elution conditions: Omin—0.5min, A phase: B phase = 80: 20, V/V; 0.5 min—1.5 min, A phase: B phase = 60: 40; 1.5 min—3.0 min, A phase: B phase = 40: 60; 3.0 min—13.0 min; A phase : B phase = 80: 20; 13.0 min—17.0 min; A phase: B phase = 80: 20; mass spectrometry system: AB Sciex TripleTOF 6600; ESI ion source: positive mode; the mass range of mass spectrum acquisition was m/z 100-1200; mass spectrometry conditions: curtain gas: 35.000 psi; ion source gas 1: 50.000; ion source gas 2: 50.00; ionSpray voltage:
5500.00V; ion source temperature: 600°C. (4) Statistical analysis of data: sigmaplot software was used for statistical analysis of data,
and t-test was used to analyze the significance of differences in the content of lipid molecules among the groups (*: p<0.05, significant difference; **: p<0.01, extremely significant difference). (5) Result analysis:
(DAs shown in Fig. 1, the effects of salt stress on the number of lipid molecules types in leaves of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum were statistically analyzed.
According to the comparison between the control group 1 and the experimental group 1 (LC-mock vs.
LC-NaCl), it can be seen that salt stress induced significant changes in the content of 36 kinds of lipid molecules in the leaves of Lycium Chinese, among which the content of 33 kinds of lipid molecules increased significantly and the content of 3 kinds of lipid molecules decreased significantly.
According to the comparison between the control group 2 and the experimental group 2 (LR-mock vs.
LR-NaCl), it can be seen that salt stress only caused significant changes in the content of 3 kinds of lipid molecules in the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum, and all of them were up-regulated.
According to the comparison between the control group 1 and the control group 2 (LC-mock vs.
LR-mock) and the comparison between the experimental group 1 and the experimental group 2 (LC-NaCl vs.
LR-NaCl), compared with Lycium Chinese, most of the lipid molecules with significant changes in content in the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum were up-regulated no matter under normal growth conditions or high salt stress conditions.
The salt tolerance evaluation of wolfberry by the number of lipid molecules types with significant changes in content need fewer number of the lipid molecules types for resisting salt stress, but with the stronger salt tolerance.
It was concluded that the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese. (2) Lipid molecules contain fatty acid (FA), lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), phosphatidylcholine (PC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl glycerol (PG), diglyceride (DG), digalactosyl diglyceride (DGDG), monogalactosyl diglyceride (MGDG), sulphoquinovosyl diglyceride (SQDG), triglyceride (TG) and other subgroups.
As shown in Fig. 2, the effects of salt stress on the number of lipid molecules types in leaves of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum in different subgroups were statistically analyzed.
It can be seen that salt stress induced the most changes in the number molecules types under the triglyceride (TG) in the leaves of Lycium Chinese, followed by the diglyceride (DG), and only a few kinds of lipid molecules content in other subgroups changed.
For the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum, salt stress only induced significant changes in the content of two phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) molecules and one igalactose diglyceride (DGDG) molecule.
It also was concluded that the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese. @As shown in Fig. 3 (FA: fatty acid; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE: lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine; PA: phosphatidic acid; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PG: phosphatidyl glycerol; PI:
phosphatidylinositol, PMeOH: phosphatidyl methanol; PS: phosphatidylserine; DG: diglyceride; DGDG: digalactosyl diglyceride; MGDG: monogalactosyl diglyceride; SQDG: sulphoquinovosyl diglyceride; TG: triglyceride), the effects of salt stress on the content of lipid molecules in the leaves of Lycium Chinese were statistically analyzed.
According to the comparison between the control group 1 and the experimental group 1 (LC-mock vs.
LC-NaCl), it can be seen that salt stress induced significant changes in the content of 36 kinds of lipid molecules in the leaves of Lycium Chinese, among which the content of 22 kinds of triglycerides (TG) was up-regulated, and the content of 7 kinds of lipid molecules changed more than twice, the content of a kind of fatty acid (FA) was up to the maximum, which was more than 3 times.
Only the content of 3 kinds of diglyceride (DG) was down-regulated, and the down-regulated range was about 1 time.
As shown in Fig. 4, the effects of salt stress on the content of lipid molecules in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum were statistically analyzed.
According to the comparison between the control group 2 and the experimental group 2 (LR-mock vs.
LR-NaCl), it can be seen that salt stress only induced significant changes in the content of 3 kinds of lipid molecules in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum, and all of them were up-regulated, including two phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and one digalactosyl diglyceride (DGDG). The up-regulated range of these three kinds of lipid molecules was at a low level, only 1.0-1.4 times.
In summary, the content of lipid molecules with significantly changed content in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum has a lower change multiple than that of Lycium Chinese.
Therefore, the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese from the analysis of content change.
Embodiment 2 Hormonal analysis was used to evaluate the salt tolerance of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum, the method is as follows: (1)The leaves pre-frozen in the refrigerator at -80°C in Embodiment 1 were taken; abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) in the leaves were extracted: liquid nitrogen was added to the leaves, and then the leaves were ground into uniform powder. 100 mg of powder was weighed and added with 100 pL each of the internal standard of ababolic acid, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, 1 mL of extraction reagent (a mixture of methanol, water and formic acid with a volume ratio of 15:4:1), was added to perform extraction, impurities were removed by centrifugation, supernatant was then taken to obtain an extracting solution.
The extracting solution was centrifuged, removed supernatant to retain the precipitate, the precipitate was dissolved in methanol aqueous solution with the mass fraction of 80%, and then filtered with a 0.22 um polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter membrane after complete dissolution, the filtered solution (the to-be-tested solution) was placed in a sample bottle for next instrument analysis. (2)Instrument detection: the to-be-tested solution obtained in step (1) was detected by Ultra- high liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), and the content of abscisic acid, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid were determined by internal standard method: chromatography system: Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADAZU CBM30A; chromatographic column: Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 (1.8 um, 2.1mmx100mm); mobile phase:aqueous phase of ultra-pure water containing 0.05% formic acid; the organic phase is acetonitrile containing 0.05% formic acid; gradient elution conditions: O min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 95:5, V/V; 0 min—1.0 min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 95:5, V V; 1.0 min->8.0 min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 5: 95, V/V; 8.0 min—9.0 min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 5: 95, V/V; 9.0 min — 9.1 min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 95:5, V/V; 9.1 min — 12.0 min, ultra-pure water: acetonitrile = 95:5, V/V, flow rate: 0.35 mL/min; column temperature:40°C; Injection volume: 2 HL; mass spectrometry system: Applied Biosystems 6500 Quadrupole Trap; mass spectrometry conditions: electrospray ion source temperature: 500°C; mass spectral voltage: 4500 V; curtain gas: 35 psi; collision induced ionization parameters: medium.
Finally, Analyst1.6.1 was used to process and analyze the mass spectrum data to obtain the qualitative and quantitative analysis data of hormones.
(3) Statistical analysis of data: sigmaplot software was used for statistical analysis of data, and t-test was used to analyze the significance of differences in hormones content among the groups (*: p<0.05, significant difference; **: p<0.01, extremely significant difference).
(4)Result analysis: As shown in Fig. 5, the content of abscisic acid (ABA) in leaves of Lycium Chinese (LC) in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) increased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced an increase in the content of abscisic acid (ABA) in the leaves of Lycium Chinese, but not a significant difference. The content of abscisic acid (ABA) in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) also increased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced an extremely significant increase in the content of abscisic acid (ABA) in the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum (p<0.01). In summary, the content change of abscisic acid in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum had a higher significance than that of Lycium Chinese. Therefore, the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese. This was the same as the evaluation result of Embodiment 1.
As shown in Fig. 8, the content of jasmonic acid (JA) in leaves of Lycium Chinese (LC) in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) decreased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced a significant decrease in the content of jasmonic acid (JA) in the leaves of Lycium Chinese(p<0.05). The content of jasmonic acid (JA) in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) decreased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced an extremely significant decrease in the content of jasmonic acid (JA) in the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum (p<0.01). In summary, the content change of jasmonic acid in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum had a higher significance than that of Lycium Chinese. Therefore, the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese. This was the same as the evaluation result of Embodiment
1. As shown in Fig. 7, the content of salicylic acid (SA) in leaves of Lycium Chinese (LC) in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) increased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced an increase in the content of salicylic acid (SA) in the leaves of Lycium Chinese, but not a significant difference. The content of salicylic acid (SA) in leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum in the experimental group (150 mM NaCl) decreased compared with that of the control group (mock), and it can be seen that salt stress induced a decrease in the content of salicylic acid (SA) in the leaves of Lycium Ruthenicum, but also not a significant difference. Therefore, salicylic acid was not selected as an index to evaluate the salt tolerance of wolfberry.
Embodiment 3 The salt tolerance of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum was evaluated by observing the growth states of seedlings under different salt stress conditions, so as to verify the reliability of the method of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2. The method was as follows: The seedlings cut after aseptic propagation in step (1) of Embodiment 1 were taken, the seedlings of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum were respectively cut in MS culture medium containing different concentrations of NaCl (0 mmol/L, 150 mmol/L, 200 mmol/L, 250 mmol/L, 300 mmol/L) to culture for 21 days in the greenhouse (photoperiod was 10h light and 14h dark, temperature was 25°C, humidity was 50%), the seedlings were separated and taken out from the MS culture medium together with their roots, the culture medium adhered to the roots of seedlings was washed, the water on the seedlings was dried with absorbent paper, and then the seedlings were photographed for observation.
As shown in Fig. 8, 150 mmol/L NaCl stress begun to inhibit the growth of seedlings, but it did not cause lethal effects on seedlings. The stress damage to seedlings became more serious with the increase of NaCl concentration. It can also be seen that the seedlings of Lycium Chinese were more seriously damaged than that of Lycium Ruthenicum under the same salt stress conditions, so it was concluded that the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese, which was the same as the evaluation result of Embodiments 1 and 2. Therefore, the evaluation method provided by the present disclosure was reliable and could be used to evaluate the salt tolerance of different wolfberry varieties.
Embodiment 4 The salt tolerance of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum was evaluated by calculating the seed germination rate under different salt stress conditions, so as to verify the reliability of the method of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2. The method was as follows: dried fruits of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum were artificially crushed, and seeds were separated from the pulp by flowing water, plump seeds with the same size were selected for subsequent experiments. Seeds were surface-sterilized with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 minutes, and then rinsed with sterile water 5 to 6 times, and blown dried in an ultra-clean workbench. Dried seeds of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum were planted in MS culture medium containing no NaCl and 150 mmol/L NaCl respectively, and cultured in a refrigerator with 4°C for 3 days, then cultured in the greenhouse (photoperiod was 10h light and 14h dark, temperature was 25°C, humidity was 50%). The statistics of seed germination rate of Lycium Chinese control group (LC-mock), experimental group of Lycium Chinese (LC-150mM NaCl), control group of Lycium Ruthenicum (LR-mock) and experimental group of Lycium Ruthenicum IO (LR-150mM NaCl) was performed every day from the third day to the 24th day of planting, and the ratio of seed germination rate of the 24th day in the experimental group/control group of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum was calculated respectivel. Sigmaplot software was used for statistical analysis of data, and t-test was used to analyze the significance of differences in the ratio of seed germination rate of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum (*: p<0.05, significant difference; **: p<0.01, extremely significant difference).
As shown in Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, the seed germination rate of Lycium Chinese and Lycium Ruthenicum was decreased in different degrees under salt stress conditions, and the inhibition degree of seed germination rate of Lycium Chinese was higher than that of Lycium Ruthenicum, so it was concluded that the salt tolerance of Lycium Ruthenicum was higher than that of Lycium Chinese, which was the same as the evaluation results of Embodiment 1 and Embodiment 2. Therefore, it was further proved that the evaluation method provided by this present disclosure was reliable and could be used to evaluate the salt tolerance of different wolfberry varieties.
Obviously, the above embodiments are only used to clearly describe the examples given, and are not intended to limit the mode of embodiments. Other changes or modifications in different forms can be made based on the above description for those skilled in the art. It is not necessary and possible to list all the embodiments here. The apparent change or variation derived from it is still within the protective scope of this present disclosure.
The following numbered clauses include examples that are contemplated and nonlimiting: Clause 1. A method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry, comprising: cutting seedlings of wolfberry to be evaluated in a culture medium without NaCl and a culture medium with NaCl to culture, respectively as a control group and an experimental group; the culture medium is a MS culture medium, the MS culture medium comprises the following components: 4.23 g/L of macro elements, 85.29 mg/L of trace elements and 103.1 mg/L of vitamin; taking leaves of the seedlings after culturing in the control group and the experimental group, detecting a content of lipid molecules in the leaves, obtaining types of the lipid molecules with significant changes of content in the experimental group compared with the control group; the content of the lipid molecules in the leaves is detected by the following steps: (1) taking a power of ground leaves, and adding into a preheated isopropyl alcohol, heating, adding a full-fat internal standard, a chloroform and an ultra-pure water, swirling, centrifuging, and taking a first supernatant; (2) adding a mixture of chloroform and methanol containing BHT into a remaining liquid after the first supernatant in step (1) is taken, swirling, centrifuging, and taking a second supernatant; (3) mixing the first supernatant and the second supernatant, adding KCl in it, swirling, centrifuging, taking subnatant, blow-drying with nitrogen, re-dissolving with isopropyl alcohol, and filtering to obtain a to-be-tested solution; evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry according to a type number and/or a content of lipid molecules with significant changes in content, the fewer the type number of lipid molecules with significant changes in content, the less the change in content, the higher the salt tolerance of wolfberry.
Clause 2. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to clause 1, wherein, in the culture medium with NaCl, a concentration of NaCl is 100~200 mmol/L.
Clause 3. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to clause 1, wherein, in the culture medium with NaCl, a concentration of NaCl is 150 mmol/L.
Clause 4. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to one of clauses 1-3, wherein, performing the culture in a greenhouse for 21 days, with a photoperiod is 10h light and 14h dark, a temperature is 25°C, a humidity is 50~70%.
Clause 5. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to one of clauses 1-3, wherein, using a t-test to determine types of lipid molecules with significant changes in content in the experimental group compared with the control group.
Clause 6. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to one of clauses 1-3, wherein, the method further comprises: taking leaves of the seedlings after culturing in the control group and the experimental group, detecting a content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves; evaluating the salt tolerance of wolfberry according to the significance of changes in the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves of the experimental group compared with the control group, the higher the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid, the higher the salt tolerance of wolfberry.
Clause 7. The method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry according to clause 6, wherein, a method for detecting the content of abscisic acid and/or jasmonic acid in the leaves, further comprises: (1) taking leaves and adding liquid nitrogen to grind into uniform powder; (2) adding an internal standard into the uniform powder obtained in step (1), adding an extraction reagent to obtain an extracting solution;
(3) concentrating, re-dissolving and filtering the extracting solution obtained in step (2) to obtain a to-be-tested solution; (4) detecting the to-be-tested solution obtained in step (3) by using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method, determining the content of abscisic acid or jasmonic acid by an internal standard method.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029158A NL2029158B1 (en) | 2021-09-09 | 2021-09-09 | Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029158A NL2029158B1 (en) | 2021-09-09 | 2021-09-09 | Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NL2029158A NL2029158A (en) | 2021-10-22 |
NL2029158B1 true NL2029158B1 (en) | 2022-07-27 |
Family
ID=78372244
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
NL2029158A NL2029158B1 (en) | 2021-09-09 | 2021-09-09 | Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
NL (1) | NL2029158B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114642149A (en) * | 2022-03-24 | 2022-06-21 | 甘肃农业大学 | Method for screening optimal concentration of 2, 4-epibrassinolide for relieving salt stress of corn seedlings |
-
2021
- 2021-09-09 NL NL2029158A patent/NL2029158B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NL2029158A (en) | 2021-10-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kil et al. | Allelopathic effects of Pinus densiflora on undergrowth of red pine forest | |
Tietz et al. | Further investigations on the occurrence and the effects of abscisic acid in algae | |
Dong et al. | Different metabolite profile and metabolic pathway with leaves and roots in response to boron deficiency at the initial stage of citrus rootstock growth | |
Fumagalli et al. | NMR techniques coupled with multivariate statistical analysis: tools to analyse Oryza sativa metabolic content under stress conditions | |
Kortesniemi et al. | 1H NMR spectroscopy reveals the effect of genotype and growth conditions on composition of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) berries | |
Kotelnikova et al. | La, Ce and Nd in the soil-plant system in a vegetation experiment with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) | |
Karimi et al. | Root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica and zinc attenuate cold stress in grapevine by influencing leaf phytochemicals and minerals content | |
NL2029158B1 (en) | Method for evaluating salt tolerance of wolfberry | |
Zhang et al. | Contribution of rhizodeposit associated microbial groups to SOC varies with maize growth stages | |
Liu | Seasonality of the altitude effect on leaf wax n-alkane distributions, hydrogen and carbon isotopes along an arid transect in the Qinling Mountains | |
Wang et al. | Analytical method for the determination of guvermectin residues in rice environment by the QuEChERS method combined with HPLC | |
Kamiab et al. | Effect of long-term salinity on growth, chemical composition and mineral elements of pistachio (Pistacia vera cv. Badami-Zarand) rootstock seedlings | |
Ozkan et al. | Morphological properties and chemical compositions of some sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) populations cultivated in Kilis, Turkey | |
Bian et al. | Lipid composition remodeling plays a critical role during the differential responses of leaves and roots to heat stress in bermudagrass | |
Guo et al. | Proteomic and metabolomic analyses reveal stage-and tissue-specific flavonoid accumulation in Ginkgo biloba | |
Liu et al. | Adaptive mechanism exploration of camellia limonia in karst high calcium environment by integrative analysis of metabolomics and metagenomics | |
AFANDI et al. | Expression of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) polyisoprenoids in response to Ganoderma boninense infection | |
Zhang et al. | Insight into flavor difference of cherry (Prunus avium L.) grown in facility environment and outdoors through metabolomics and correlation analysis | |
Li et al. | An improved high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of soluble sugars in root exudates of greenhouse cucumber grown under CO2 enrichment | |
Chen et al. | Characteristics of chemical components in the trunk xylem sap of pine trees by means of a centrifugation collection method | |
CN110954615A (en) | A plant sex identification method using characteristic metabolites | |
CN113466368B (en) | Method for evaluating salt tolerance of Chinese wolfberry variety | |
Bičárová et al. | Modified electrolyte leakage method for testing the oxidative stability of Pinus mugo Turra under ozone-induced stress. | |
CN112730346B (en) | Method for effectively measuring nitrogen efficiency of perennial woody plants in field | |
Novitskaya et al. | The effects of a weak permanent magnetic field on the lipid composition and content in the onion leaves of various ages |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MM | Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20241001 |