NL2021267B1 - Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock - Google Patents

Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock Download PDF

Info

Publication number
NL2021267B1
NL2021267B1 NL2021267A NL2021267A NL2021267B1 NL 2021267 B1 NL2021267 B1 NL 2021267B1 NL 2021267 A NL2021267 A NL 2021267A NL 2021267 A NL2021267 A NL 2021267A NL 2021267 B1 NL2021267 B1 NL 2021267B1
Authority
NL
Netherlands
Prior art keywords
stress
stimuli
animals
stimulus
suppressing
Prior art date
Application number
NL2021267A
Other languages
Dutch (nl)
Inventor
Obers Paul
Original Assignee
P L Invest Bv
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by P L Invest Bv filed Critical P L Invest Bv
Priority to NL2021267A priority Critical patent/NL2021267B1/en
Priority to PCT/EP2019/068121 priority patent/WO2020011671A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of NL2021267B1 publication Critical patent/NL2021267B1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K1/00Housing animals; Equipment therefor
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K15/00Devices for taming animals, e.g. nose-rings or hobbles; Devices for overturning animals in general; Training or exercising equipment; Covering boxes
    • A01K15/02Training or exercising equipment, e.g. mazes or labyrinths for animals ; Electric shock devices ; Toys specially adapted for animals
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K29/00Other apparatus for animal husbandry
    • A01K29/005Monitoring or measuring activity, e.g. detecting heat or mating

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Housing For Livestock And Birds (AREA)

Abstract

20 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SUPPRESSING STRESS IN LIVESTOCK ABSTRACT 5 In a first aspect, the current invention concerns a method for suppressing stress in livestock, wherein a plurality of animals is accommodated in a barn, said method comprises gathering information relating to one or more of the animals, and/or relating to one or more barn conditions, on the basis of which information a stress level is determined and wherein, where the stress level is indicating a stressed 10 state for at least one of the animals, one or more stress-suppressing stimuli are activated and/or amplified, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus. In further aspects, the invention provides a system for suppressing stress in livestock, and a barn that is provided with such a system.

Description

Technical field
The invention pertains to the technical field of methods and systems for suppressing stress in livestock.
Background
Cows, pigs, chickens and other livestock animals are kept by humans on an industrial scale. Quite often, a plurality of individual animals is accommodated in a single barn.
Such animals, when subjected to high levels of stress, are restless. The corresponding animal production (e.g. in terms of milk quantity, meat growth, egg laying) is thereby lowered. Moreover, stress can further affect the quality (e.g. taste and/or structure) of animal products.
It has been observed that one stressed animal can increase stress levels of animals in its proximity. In extreme cases, stressed animals can even behave aggressively, thereby hurting themselves and others. Chronic stress may further result in suppression of the immune system, and therefore to an increased susceptibility to all kinds of diseases. Medication levels thus have to be raised in case of persistently high stress levels.
For most animal species, stress information can be derived from blood analyses, e.g. on the basis of hormone balances in the blood. This obviously constitutes a highly invasive method. Moreover, it allows for determining the separate stress level of individual animals only.
US 8 915 215 Bl relates to a system having a plurality of sensors for monitoring poultry in a barn. To this end, the sound generated by the animals is analyzed. Important deviations with respect to standard values are indicative of unhealthy poultry. The operator may then interfere by remedying the adverse barn conditions that are causing this situation.
Training dairy heifers to respond to a sound stimulus in a T-maze setup (Green et al., 2016) further describes that the behavior of cattle can be influenced via acoustic signals.
Effects of auditory and physical enrichment on 3 measurements of fear and stress (tonic immobility duration, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, and fluctuating asymmetry) in several breeds of layer chicks (Davila et al., 2011) states that stress in poultry can be decreased via auditory enrichment, for instance by playing classical music at regular, fixed intervals. The effect of physical enrichment, via stimulus objects was found to be rather limited, because of habituation.
The present invention aims to provide a method and system for suppressing stress in livestock. A primary goal is thereby to reduce animal suffering, and to enhance animal production, both in terms of quantity and quality.
Summary of the invention
In a first aspect, the invention discloses a method according to claim 1, for suppressing stress in livestock. A stress level is determined and, in case latter stress level indicates a stressed state for at least one of the animals, one or more stress-suppressing stimuli are activated and/or amplified. These stimuli at least comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus. Latter electromagnetic stimulus may be a light stimulus.
Quite advantageously, information can be gathered through non-invasive measurement techniques. Such information can serve as a basis for determining stress levels by which stressed states can be identified with reasonably good probabilities. Most importantly, certain stimuli are only activated and/or amplified depending on whether stress is actually detected and/or on the amount of stress. As such, the stimuli are most efficiently deployed, and there is preferably no unnecessary exposal of animals to these stimuli. Consequently, habituation to these stimuli can be excluded, or at least delayed. In doing so, the invention attempts lowering both acute and chronic stress levels, thereby reducing animal suffering. Destructive stress, possibly giving rise to aggressive behavior and even cannibalism is especially targeted.
Optionally, at least one of the stress-suppressing stimuli comprises a time-variable spectrum and/or a time-variable intensity. Risk of habituation to this stimulus is thereby further lowered.
In further aspects, the invention concerns a system according to claim 16, for suppressing stress in livestock, and a barn according to claim 22, which barn is provided with a system according to any of claims 16-21.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention concerns a method and a system for suppressing stress in livestock. The invention further concerns a barn that is provided with such a system.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms used in disclosing the invention, including technical and scientific terms, have the meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. By means of further guidance, term definitions are included to better appreciate the teaching of the present invention.
As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
A, an, and the as used herein refers to both singular and plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. By way of example, a compartment refers to one or more than one compartment.
About as used herein referring to a measurable value such as a parameter, an amount, a temporal duration, and the like, is meant to encompass variations of +/20% or less, preferably +/-10% or less, more preferably +/-5% or less, even more preferably +/-1% or less, and still more preferably +/-0.1% or less of and from the specified value, in so far such variations are appropriate to perform in the disclosed invention. However, it is to be understood that the value to which the modifier about refers is itself also specifically disclosed.
Comprise, comprising, and comprises and comprised of as used herein are synonymous with include, including, includes or contain, containing, contains and are inclusive or open-ended terms that specifies the presence of what follows e.g. component and do not exclude or preclude the presence of additional, non-recited components, features, element, members, steps, known in the art or disclosed therein.
The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers and fractions subsumed within that range, as well as the recited endpoints. The expression % by weight, weight percent, %wt or wt%, here and throughout the description unless otherwise defined, refers to the relative weight of the respective component based on the overall weight of the formulation.
In a first aspect, the invention provides a method for suppressing stress in livestock, wherein a plurality of animals is accommodated in a barn, said method comprises gathering information relating to one or more of the animals, and/or relating to one or more barn conditions, on the basis of which information a stress level is determined and wherein, where the stress level is indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals, one or more stress-suppressing stimuli are activated and/or amplified, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus.
The term barn should be interpreted in a broad fashion, as referring to any infrastructure that allows for accommodating a plurality animals within an enclosed area. Preferably, a barn at least comprises one or more side structures, and optionally a floor and/or roof structure. However, this is not necessarily the case.
The term livestock, as used herein, may refer to any type (optionally species) of animal that is kept by humans, at least for animal production. The terms animal and animals thereby further refer to (an) individual specimen(s) of such type/species. Preferably, these animals can be kept on an industrial scale. Such animals may comprise cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, geese, ducks, rabbits, donkeys, horses, ostriches, emus, deer, kangaroos, camels, dromedaries, and/or lamas.
The present invention provides a method for suppressing stress in animals. To such purpose information is gathered, allowing for the determination of a stress level. In a possible embodiment, said stress level may be a value that expresses the general amount of stress the animals are one average subjected to. In another, possible embodiment, said stress level may comprise one or multiple values that express the individual amount of stress that one or multiple, respective animals is subjected to. The stress level may thus be one- or multidimensional, comprising either one value or multiple values. In a possible embodiment, the stress level can only take values 0 and 1, indicating no stressed state and at least one stressed state respectively. However, invention is by no means limited to any of these embodiments.
In possible embodiments, the stress level may only indirectly relate to the amount of stress that one or more animals is subjected to. Non-limiting examples of the latter comprise stress levels derived from the air ammonia content (a barn condition), or from the animal activity as registered by means of video cameras (an animal condition). These and other examples are elaborated upon below.
The information is preferably gathered in a non-invasive fashion; i.e. the animals are not hindered at all, or they are only negligibly hindered. Preferably, the information is gathered remotely; i.e. without contacting the animals.
Preferably, the information is gathered continuously and/or repetitively. It is thereby possible to continuously/repetitively update the stress level. Knowledge on (recently) updated stress levels allows for taking action as fast as possible, preferably in real-time. Advantageously, it is thereby possible to already intervene in an early stage, when detecting the first symptoms of stress. Its further spreading can thus be prevented.
Optionally, the stress level may comprise history information that relates to the amount of stress that one or more animals was subjected to in the past. On the one hand, animals that were stressed-out previously are often more susceptible to stress. A correspondingly swift and thorough action may thus be required. On the other hand, history information may smoothen possible control systems via PD control, PI control, PID control, and/or other control techniques, as is known in the field of control systems engineering.
In the event that the stress level indicates a stressed state for at least one of the animals, action is taken through activation/amplification of one or more, stresssuppressing stimuli. As already mentioned in the background section, a stressed state may be objectively defined, for instance on the basis of blood analysis. Optionally, proper prerequisites such as substance occurrences and/or threshold concentrations are thereby defined. These and other measurement and interpretation techniques for defining stressed states are known in the art. At least some of these techniques (e.g. blood analysis) are highly invasive.
Quite advantageously, the present invention rather employs a stress level that indicates whether (a) at least one of the animals is in a stressed state, or (b) none of the animals is in a stressed state. Preferably said stress level is determined via information that is gathered in a non-invasive and/or remote fashion, as described above. Alternatively, said stress level may at least partly be derived from an invasive measurement technique, for instance from blood analysis.
In a non-limiting embodiment, the stress level indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals, corresponds to a probability of at least 50% that at least one of the animals is in a stressed state, preferably a probability of at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%. Moreover, a stress level indicating not indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals, corresponds to a probability of at least 50% that none of the animals is in a stressed state, preferably a probability of at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%.
A stimulus, as used herein, is a change in the environment (e.g. within the barn) having certain characteristics, and/or exceeding certain thresholds, such that it can be detected by at least one of the animals (i.e. it at least affects those animals; whether or not they are indeed aware of said stimulus is of lesser importance). When exposed to a stress-suppressing stimulus, as used herein, the animals generally so respond that their average stress level is reduced, or at least so that one or more stress-symptoms are suppressed. In a possible embodiment, an animal previously in a stressed state will no longer reside in a stressed state when being exposed to a stress-suppressing stimulus for a sufficiently long time.
Throughout its activation time (e.g. in stress situations), the stimulus will cause the environment to be changed as compared to the standard situation (where the stress level does not indicate a stressed state for at least one of the animals). For instance the environment is lighter, darker, louder, quieter, etc. as compared to the standard situation. The degree of difference, as compared to latter standard situation is more pronounced when amplifying the stimulus. Conversely, the degree of difference becomes less pronounced when weakening the stimulus. In particular, the above-mentioned, stress-suppressing stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus. Latter electromagnetic stimulus may be a visible light stimulus. However, it may equally comprise other electromagnetic wavelengths, such as IR and UV, and is not limited to such wavelengths.
Preferably, any sound stimulus should at least comprise frequencies that lay within the hearing range of the animal(s) in question. Alternatively, the general hearing range of the corresponding animal species at least partly covers the sound stimulus frequency content. Sound stimulus and auditory stimulus may thereby be seen as equivalent. The hearing range for most animal species has already been mapped. For instance, the hearing range of cattle stretches from about 25 Hz to about 35 kHz; the hearing range of pigs stretches from about 42 Hz to about 40,5 kHz; the hearing range of sheep stretches from about 100 Hz to about 30 kHz; the hearing range of goats stretches from about 78 Hz to about 37 kHz; and the hearing range of poultry stretches from about 9,1 Hz to about 7,2 kHz.
The background section already mentions that acoustic signals can influence the behavior of cattle. Furthermore, it was mentioned that stress in poultry can be decreased by playing classical music at regular, fixed intervals. In general, through hearing, impulses are given to the brain stem and to the hypothalamus. Wellchosen sound stimuli may thereby decrease stress, either directly or indirectly. For example, well-chosen sound stimuli may simply distract attention from possible stressors. The inventors for instance found that poultry freezes at high-intensity, low-frequency sounds (e.g. a nearby and active diesel engine). Such sounds may also be employed for immobilizing animals that suffer from chronic stress and show aggressive behavior. Alternatively, a sound stimulus constituting a background sound of chilled-out animals may suppress general stress levels.
However, in further or alternative embodiments, said sound stimulus mainly comprises frequencies that not necessarily fall within the hearing range of the animals, such as ultrasound frequencies. It is known that such frequencies can influence the behavior of living organisms, for instance via ultrasound-mediated, non-invasive brain stimulation.
In a similar fashion is known that electromagnetic fields may affect the behavior of living organisms, for instance through electrical brain stimulation. Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation has previously been tested on rats, as discussed in Noninvasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage (Henrich-Noack et al., 2017). Research is also being performed on electrical brain stimulation for stress relieving purposes.
Optionally the aforementioned, electromagnetic stimulus is a light stimulus. Preferably, any light stimulus should at least comprise frequencies that lay within the visible spectrum of the animal(s) in question. Alternatively, the general visible spectrum of the corresponding animal species at least partly covers the light stimulus frequency content. Light stimulus and visual stimulus may thus be seen as equivalent for the purpose of the invention. The visible spectrum for most animal species has already been mapped. For instance, pigs can see red, green, and blue wavelengths. Domestic poultry even responds to near ultraviolet (UV-A) light, and has a visible spectrum ranging from about 315 nm to about 750 nm, with multiple sensitivity peaks. Cattle, on the other hand, can only see yellow and blue wavelengths, in addition to gray and black.
The inventors found that light stimuli allow for altering the behavior of animals, and for decreasing stress levels in animals. In case of pigs, for example, red wavelengths can mask blood and wounds to a certain extent, such that aggressive behavior towards already wounded animals is no longer encouraged. Moreover, both predominantly blue light and dimmed light have a calming effect on poultry. Red light, on the other hand, will incite poultry to stand up, to walk around, and to feed, thereby being distracted from possible stressors. In a similar fashion as is the case for pigs, predominantly red light prevents or suppresses aggressive behavior (for instance caused by stress) in poultry. Ultraviolet light enhances communication in poultry, thereby increasing social contact in between animals, and thereby decreasing the general stress level.
Optionally, the nature of at least one of the stimuli depends on the stress level height. In possible embodiments, the intensity of at least one of the stimuli is a function of the stress level height. Optionally, the stimulus intensity continuously evolves with the stress level height.
In a further or alternative embodiment, at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable spectrum. At least one frequency component of the stimulus thereby varies in time. In a further or alternative embodiment, at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable intensity. In both embodiments, the stimuli constitute a changed environment w.r.t. the standard environment, whereby the degree and/or nature of change varies in time. Preferably, latter variability is such that it can be perceived by the animals, whereby the corresponding temporal sensitivity and resolution of the animals are taken into account. The stimulus thus causes an enrichment (e.g. auditory or visual) that varies in time. Because of its variability, such stimuli can have a more pronounced, stress-suppressing effect. Most importantly, habituation of the animals to the stimuli is excluded or delayed.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said stimuli at least comprise a sound stimulus having a variable sound spectrum and/or having a variable sound intensity. Its sound spectrum and/or intensity thereby vary in time, throughout activation of the stimulus. Sound intensity, as used herein, should be understood as the sound intensity level, expressed in decibel (dB). Possible embodiments include playing stress-suppressing music, and/or playing a background sound of chilled-out animals whenever the stress level is indicating a stressed state.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said stimuli at least comprise a light stimulus having a variable light spectrum and/or having a variable light intensity. Its light spectrum and/or sensitivity thereby vary in time, throughout activation of the stimulus. Possible embodiments include producing light having a time-varying color range, and/or producing pulsating light.
A light stimulus may optionally comprise a position-varying light spectrum and/or intensity, whereby different positions are illuminated at different intensities and/or using different colors. While cattle, for instance, is rather insensitive to color, they tend to be very sensitive to contrasts in color. A position-varying light stimulus may therefore provoke a strong response.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said stimuli further comprise a physical stimulus. Preferably a physical stimulus, as used herein, comprises objects that can be seen and/or touched by the animals. The objects thereby cause a physical enrichment in the animal environment. In particular, such objects may increase the complexity of the animal environment, and they may provide shelter to one or more animals. Activation of a physical stimulus should be understood as making the objects (e.g. toys, boxes ...) visible or accessible to the animals. Optionally, such objects are only activated when the stress level is indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals. As such, habituation of the animals to the stimulus is excluded or delayed. In possible embodiments, an uncovering, unfolding and/or descending mechanism may to this end be employed.
Optionally, the physical stimulus comprises a sound-affecting object. For instance, the object may comprise an acoustically damping structure, a sound-reflecting structure, an acoustically resonating structure, an anechoic structure, or any combination thereof. In a non-limiting embodiment, acoustically damping structures provide shelter for poultry that has already been calmed down, while stressed animals still running around are fully exposed to the high-intensity, low-frequency sounds discussed above.
Optionally, the physical stimulus comprises a light-affecting object. For instance, the object may comprise a light-absorbing surface, a light-reflecting surface, a colored surface, a glittering surface, a light-diffractive surface, or any combination thereof. In a non-limiting embodiment, one or more objects featuring large color contrasts will distract cattle from possible stressors.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said stimuli further comprise a chemical or biochemical stimulus. Some chemical substances may indeed have a stresssuppressing effect. Biochemical stimuli may for instance comprise odors, pheromones, and/or oxygen.
In a further or alternative embodiment, at least one of the stimuli is weakened and/or deactivated, where the stress level is no longer indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals. Preferably, throughout activation of the stimuli, stress monitoring is continued. An advantage is that habituation to these stimuli can be avoided, by deactivating or at least by weakening the stimuli as soon as possible stressors are removed and/or stress levels have been sufficiently lowered.
In a further or alternative embodiment, at least one of the stimuli is weakened and/or deactivated, as soon as a predetermined time interval has lapsed. Latter time interval can be tailored to the stimulus in question, thereby avoiding habituation. Poultry for instance, will relatively soon habituate to physical stimuli, while it will only very slowly habituate to classical music. More generally, the abovementioned time intervals can be set accordingly.
In a further or alternative embodiment, at least one of the stimuli is activated for no more than 24 hours. In a further or alternative embodiment, any stimulus is generated for no more than 50% of the time. As such, habituation is delayed or excluded.
In a further or alternative embodiment, the stress level is at least determined on the basis of sound information. To this end, sound recorded in and/or around the barn is analyzed. In a non-limiting embodiment, the stress level relates to sound intensity, whereby the stressed state is indicated by an intensity surpassing a preset threshold. Of course, other embodiments may additionally or alternatively consider the sound-silence ratio, the presence of any meaningful sounds that relate to stress, or any other sound information. Poultry, for instance, is especially sensitive to pitch, tone and rhythm changes. The animals use very specific sounds, songs and calls in stressful situations. In a possible embodiment, stresssuppressing stimuli are activated and/or amplified upon detection of any of such sounds/songs/calls.
In a further or alternative embodiment, the stress level is at least determined on the basis of an ammonia content, a CO2 content, a temperature, and/or an animal activity. When combining multiple data, the stress level as determined will generally be more reliable.
It is known that increased ammonia contents can be indicative of stressed states. Moreover, stress may be identified from increased body temperatures (e.g. via IR thermometry, corrected for the type of animal), for instance when the animals exhibit acute stress-induced hyperthermia. In any case, the body activity of stressed animals is often increased. CO2 emissions correspondingly increase, giving rise to higher CO2 contents inside the barn. Additionally or alternatively the animal activity, which could be an indicator of stress, can be measured via time-correlation of images. However, in no way the invention is limited to any of these.
In a further or alternative embodiment, the barn comprises two or more zones, whereby the stress level is determined zonally. There need not be a physical separation in between these zones; the subdivision into different zones may be purely conceptual. Optionally, zones that are particularly prone to stress outbreaks can thus be identified, and possible stressors can be remedied locally. In some cases, stress starts locally and spreads. Optionally local outbreaks of stress can now be isolated by providing an actual, physical separation. In such embodiments, any further spreading of stress is hindered.
In a further or alternative embodiment, the stimuli are activated and/or amplified zonally. Advantageously, stress is only remedied zonally where required. Animals in other zones are not exposed to these stimuli. These animals thus not risk habituation.
In a further or alternative embodiment, the method according to the first aspect is a computer-implemented method. Preferably, said method is at least partly automated, via a plurality of sensors that gather the information, and via a processor that processes the information and that actuates means for generating stress-suppressing stimuli. In a non-limiting embodiment, an alert message is sent to a mobile user device (e.g. a smartphone, tablet, laptop, etc.) each time that a new stressed state is identified.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said animals are cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and/or poultry. Said poultry may comprise chickens, ducks, geese, turkeys, and optionally any other poultry. In another, non-limiting embodiment, said animals are poultry such as chickens, ducks, turkeys, geese, and/or any other poultry. In a further embodiment, said animals are chickens, ducks, turkeys, and/or geese. Preferably said animals comprise poultry. More preferably said animals consist of poultry.
In a second aspect, the invention provides a system for suppressing stress in livestock, configured for being installed in a barn accommodating a plurality of animals, wherein said system comprises a plurality of sensors for gathering information relating to one or more of said animals, and/or relating to one or more barn conditions, and wherein the system is configured for determining a stress level on the basis of the information gathered. In particular, the system further comprises means for activating and/or amplifying one or more stress-suppressing stimuli, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus. Latter electromagnetic stimulus may optionally be a light stimulus, as specified in respect of the above method.
Preferably, said system is capable of performing the method according to the first aspect, whereby the same characteristics and corresponding advantages can be repeated.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said system further comprises a processor, configured for reading out the aforementioned sensors, and for determining the stress level. Preferably, said system is an automated system. Optionally, said system comprises a communication module for sending alert messages as discussed above.
In a further or alternative embodiment, said sensors are configured for registering sound information, an ammonia content, a CO2 content, a temperature and/or an animal activity. In a further or alternative embodiment, said system is a computerimplemented system.
In a third aspect, the invention provides a barn, configured for accommodating a plurality of animals. In particular, said barn is provided with a system according to the second aspect of the invention, for suppressing stress in livestock.
The invention is further described by the following non-limiting examples and figures which further illustrate the invention, and are not intended to, nor should they be interpreted to, limit the scope of the invention.
Example 1
In a non-limiting embodiment, a barn having a floor structure, a roof structure, and four wall structures is internally provided with 12 microphones for registering sounds produced by poultry accommodated in 12 corresponding zones. These zones correspond to floor areas lying in the neighborhood of the aforementioned microphones. The system particularly identifies any specific, stress-related sounds, through comparison with a predetermined sound database. Sound stimuli are activated within a certain zone, as soon as any of such stress-related sounds are individually detected more than ten 10 times in the preceding minute, via the corresponding microphone. The zonal stress level is correspondingly set to 1. Latter sound stimuli comprise a bird sound compilation featuring relaxed poultry only. Moreover its activation is maintained until 15 minutes have passed, or until not a single stress-related sound is registered during 2 minutes, whichever falls earlier. The stress level corresponding to the zone in question is then again set to 0. The timeframes mentioned herein may of course be optimized for specific species of poultry.
Example 2
In a non-limiting embodiment, about 200 pigs are accommodated in a single barn. The stress level is calculated via time-correlation of video images, and corrected for ammonia content in the air, taking continuous values between 0% and 100%. Whenever the stress level surpasses a threshold of 50%, the light in the barn is automatically dimmed by 20% with respect to the standard light intensity value. This calming environment is then maintained during 8 minutes. Red lights are activated if, within this timeframe, sound intensities are detected that are indicative of stress-aggressive behavior. This makes it harder for the pigs to discern blood, such that aggressive behavior is no longer encouraged. This environment is maintained for 4 minutes maximum, after which the system is reset.
Example 3
In a non-limiting embodiment, about 28 cows are accommodated in a closed barn that is provided with a climate control system. The temperature of the cows is continuously monitored through infrared thermometry. As soon as at least one of the cows has a body temperature surpassing 39,5°C, an alert message is sent to a mobile user device of an operator. Simultaneously, speakers are activated, producing a burst of fine classical music during about 30 minutes, after which the system will be reset. In the meantime, the operator can consult video images showing the cows, to determine whether the increased temperature indeed stems from stress, or rather from sickness. In the latter case, a veterinary is consulted.
It is supposed that the present invention is not restricted to any form of realization described previously and that some modifications can be added to the presented examples/figures without reappraisal of the appended claims.
The invention may thereto be described according to the following embodiments:
1. A method for suppressing stress in livestock, wherein a plurality of animals is accommodated in a barn, said method comprises gathering information relating to one or more of the animals, and/or relating to one or more barn conditions, on the basis of which information a stress level is determined and wherein, where the stress level is indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals, one or more stress-suppressing stimuli are activated and/or amplified, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus.
2. The method according to previous embodiment 1, characterized in that said stress-suppressing stimuli at least comprise a sound stimulus and/or a light stimulus.
3. The method according to any of embodiments 1 and 2, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable spectrum.
4. The method according to any of embodiments 1-3, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable intensity.
5. The method according to any of embodiments 1-4, characterized in that said stimuli at least comprise a sound stimulus having a variable sound spectrum and/or having a variable sound intensity.
6. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that said stimuli further comprise a physical stimulus.
7. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is weakened and/or deactivated, where the stress level is no longer indicating a stressed state for at least one of the animals.
8. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is weakened and/or deactivated, as soon as a predetermined time interval has lapsed.
9. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is activated for no more than 24 hours.
10. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that the stress level is at least determined on the basis of sound information.
11. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that the stress level is at least determined on the basis of an ammonia content, a CO2 content, a temperature, and/or an animal activity.
12. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that the barn comprises two or more zones, whereby the stress level is determined zonally.
13. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that the stimuli are activated and/or amplified zonally.
14. The method according to any of the previous embodiments, characterized in that said method is a computer-implemented method.
15. The method according to any of the previous claims, characterized in that said animals are cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, ducks, turkeys, geese, and/or chickens.
16. A system for suppressing stress in livestock, configured for being installed in a barn accommodating a plurality of animals, wherein said system comprises a plurality of sensors for gathering information relating to one or more of said animals, and/or relating to one or more barn conditions, and wherein the system is configured for determining a stress level on the basis of the information gathered, characterized in that the system further comprises means for activating and/or amplifying one or more stress-suppressing stimuli, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and/or an electromagnetic stimulus.
17. The system according to previous embodiment 16, characterized in that said stress-suppressing stimuli at least comprise a sound stimulus and/or a light stimulus.
18. The system according to any of embodiments 16 and 17, characterized in that said system comprises a processor, configured for reading out the aforementioned sensors, and for determining the stress level.
19. The system according to any of embodiments 16-18, characterized in that said sensors are configured for registering sound information, an ammonia content, a CO2 content, a temperature and/or an animal activity.
20. The system according to any of embodiments 16-19, characterized in that said system is a computer-implemented system.
21. The system according to any of embodiments 16-20, characterized in that said system is configured for performing the method according to any of embodiments 1-15.
22. A barn, configured for accommodating a plurality of animals, characterized in that said barn is provided with a system according to any of embodiments 16-21, for suppressing stress in livestock.

Claims (22)

CONCLUSIESCONCLUSIONS 1. Een werkwijze voor het onderdrukken van stress bij vee, waarbij een veelheid aan dieren is ondergebracht in een stal, de werkwijze omvattende het verzamelen van informatie met betrekking tot één of meerdere van de dieren en/of met betrekking tot één of meerdere condities in de stal, aan de hand van welke informatie er een stressniveau wordt bepaald en waarbij, ingeval het stressniveau wijst op een gestresseerde toestand voor minstens één van de dieren, er één of meerdere, stress-onderdrukkende stimuli worden geactiveerd en/of versterkt, welke stimuli een geluidstimulus en/of een elektromagnetische stimulus omvatten.A method for suppressing stress in cattle, wherein a plurality of animals is housed in a shed, the method comprising collecting information relating to one or more of the animals and / or relating to one or more conditions in the stable, on the basis of which information a stress level is determined and in which, if the stress level indicates a stressed condition for at least one of the animals, one or more stress-suppressing stimuli are activated and / or amplified, which stimuli a sound stimulus and / or an electromagnetic stimulus. 2. De werkwijze volgens voorgaande conclusie 1, met het kenmerk, dat de stress-onderdrukkende stimuli minstens een geluidstimulus en/of een lichtstimulus omvatten.The method according to the preceding claim 1, characterized in that the stress-suppressing stimuli comprise at least one sound stimulus and / or a light stimulus. 3. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 1 en 2, met het kenmerk, dat minstens één van de stimuli een veranderlijk spectrum omvat.The method according to any of the preceding claims 1 and 2, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable spectrum. 4. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 1 tot en met 3, met het kenmerk, dat minstens één van de stimuli een veranderlijke intensiteit omvat.The method according to any one of the preceding claims 1 to 3, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli comprises a variable intensity. 5. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat de stimuli minstens een geluidstimulus omvatten met een veranderlijk geluidsspectrum en/of met een veranderlijke geluidsintensiteit.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the stimuli comprise at least one sound stimulus with a variable sound spectrum and / or with a variable sound intensity. 6. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat de stimuli verder nog een fysieke stimulus omvatten.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the stimuli further comprise a physical stimulus. 7. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat minstens één van de stimuli wordt verzwakt en/of gedeactiveerd, ingeval het stressniveau niet langer wijst op een gestresseerde toestand voor minstens één van de dieren.The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is weakened and / or deactivated if the stress level no longer indicates a stressed state for at least one of the animals. 8. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat minstens één van de stimuli wordt verzwakt en/of gedeactiveerd, van zodra een vooropgesteld tijdsinterval is verstreken.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is weakened and / or deactivated as soon as a predetermined time interval has elapsed. 9. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat minstens één van de stimuli gedurende niet langer dan 24 uur wordt geactiveerd.The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least one of the stimuli is activated for no longer than 24 hours. 10. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat het stressniveau minstens wordt bepaald aan de hand van geluidsinformatie.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the stress level is at least determined on the basis of sound information. 11. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat het stressniveau minstens wordt bepaald aan de hand van een ammoniakgehalte, een CO2-gehalte, een temperatuur en/of een dierlijke activiteit.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the stress level is determined at least on the basis of an ammonia content, a CO 2 content, a temperature and / or an animal activity. 12. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat de stal twee of meerdere zones omvat, waarbij het stressniveau zonaal wordt bepaald.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the shed comprises two or more zones, the stress level being determined zonally. 13. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat de stimuli zonaal worden geactiveerd en/of versterkt.The method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the stimuli are activated and / or amplified zonally. 14. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat het een computer-geïmplementeerde werkwijze betreft.The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that it is a computer-implemented method. 15. De werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies, met het kenmerk, dat de dieren runderen, varkens, schapen, geiten, eenden, kalkoenen, ganzen en/of kippen zijn.The method according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the animals are cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, ducks, turkeys, geese and / or chickens. 16. Een systeem voor het onderdrukken van stress bij vee, ervoor geconfigureerd om te worden geïnstalleerd in een stal met een veelheid aan dieren, waarbij het systeem een veelheid aan sensoren omvat voor het verzamelen van informatie met betrekking tot één of meerdere van de dieren en/of met betrekking tot één of meerdere condities in de stal, en waarbij het systeem geconfigureerd voor het bepalen van een stressniveau op basis van de verzamelde informatie, met het kenmerk, dat het systeem verder nog middelen omvat voor het activeren en/of versterken van één of meerdere stress-onderdrukkende stimuli, welke stimuli een geluidstimulus en/of een elektromagnetische stimulus omvatten.16. A system for suppressing stress in cattle, configured to be installed in a stable with a plurality of animals, the system comprising a plurality of sensors for collecting information relating to one or more of the animals and / or with respect to one or more conditions in the shed, and wherein the system is configured to determine a stress level based on the information collected, characterized in that the system further comprises means for activating and / or reinforcing one or more stress-suppressing stimuli, which stimuli comprise a sound stimulus and / or an electromagnetic stimulus. 17. Het systeem volgens voorgaande conclusie 16, met het kenmerk, dat de stress-onderdrukkende stimuli minstens een geluidsstimulus en/of een lichtstimulus omvatten.The system according to the preceding claim 16, characterized in that the stress-suppressing stimuli comprise at least one sound stimulus and / or a light stimulus. 18. Het systeem volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 16 en 17, met het kenmerk, dat het een processor omvat, geconfigureerd voor uitlezing van voorgenoemde sensoren en voor bepaling van het stressniveau.The system according to any of the preceding claims 16 and 17, characterized in that it comprises a processor configured for reading out said sensors and for determining the stress level. 19. Het systeem volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 16 tot en met 18, met het kenmerk, dat de sensoren zijn geconfigureerd voor registratie van geluidsinformatie, een ammoniakgehalte, een CO2-gehalte, een temperatuur en/of van een dierlijke activiteit.The system according to any of the preceding claims 16 to 18, characterized in that the sensors are configured to record sound information, an ammonia content, a CO 2 content, a temperature and / or an animal activity. 20. Het systeem volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 16 tot en met 19, met het kenmerk, dat het een computer-geïmplementeerd systeem betreft.The system according to any of the preceding claims 16 to 19, characterized in that it is a computer-implemented system. 21. Het systeem volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 16 tot en met 20, met het kenmerk, dat het geconfigureerd is voor het uitvoeren van de werkwijze volgens één der voorgaande conclusies 1 tot en met 15.The system according to any of the preceding claims 16 to 20, characterized in that it is configured to perform the method according to any of the preceding claims 1 to 15. 22. Een stal, geconfigureerd voor het erin onderbrengen van een veelheid aan22. A stable, configured to accommodate a multitude of 5 dieren, met het kenmerk, dat de stal is uitgerust met een systeem volgens één der conclusies 16 tot en met 21, voor het onderdrukken van stress bij vee.5 animals, characterized in that the stable is equipped with a system according to any one of claims 16 to 21, for suppressing stress in cattle. METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SUPPRESSING STRESS IN LIVESTOCKMETHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SUPPRESSING STRESS IN LIVESTOCK
NL2021267A 2018-07-09 2018-07-09 Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock NL2021267B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL2021267A NL2021267B1 (en) 2018-07-09 2018-07-09 Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock
PCT/EP2019/068121 WO2020011671A1 (en) 2018-07-09 2019-07-05 Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL2021267A NL2021267B1 (en) 2018-07-09 2018-07-09 Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NL2021267B1 true NL2021267B1 (en) 2020-01-15

Family

ID=67220803

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NL2021267A NL2021267B1 (en) 2018-07-09 2018-07-09 Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock

Country Status (2)

Country Link
NL (1) NL2021267B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2020011671A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AT407097B (en) 1998-09-25 2000-12-27 Schauer Herbert Mag DEVICE FOR MONITORING AND, IF NECESSARY, CARE OF FARM ANIMALS
NL1017352C2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2002-08-22 Lely Entpr Ag Device for performing a treatment on a dairy animal.
US8915215B1 (en) 2012-06-21 2014-12-23 Scott A. Helgeson Method and apparatus for monitoring poultry in barns
WO2014118788A2 (en) * 2013-02-04 2014-08-07 Faunus Ltd. Early warning system and/or optical monitoring of livestock including poultry
GB2522020B (en) * 2014-01-08 2018-01-10 Greengage Lighting Ltd A method of livestock rearing and a livestock shed

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2020011671A1 (en) 2020-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Fontana et al. An innovative approach to predict the growth in intensive poultry farming
Wöhr et al. Effects of experience and context on 50-kHz vocalizations in rats
Schwarting et al. Situational factors, conditions and individual variables which can determine ultrasonic vocalizations in male adult Wistar rats
Von Frijtag et al. Individual housing during the play period results in changed responses to and consequences of a psychosocial stress situation in rats
Laxmi et al. Generalisation of conditioned fear and its behavioural expression in mice
Leliveld et al. Behavioural and physiological measures indicate subtle variations in the emotional valence of young pigs
Siniscalchi et al. The dog nose “KNOWS” fear: Asymmetric nostril use during sniffing at canine and human emotional stimuli
Musolf et al. Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations in wild house mice, Mus musculus musculus
Wilson et al. Fowl communicate the size, speed and proximity of avian stimuli through graded structure in referential alarm calls
US20220125021A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for livestock rearing
Wöhr et al. Ultrasonic calling during fear conditioning in the rat: no evidence for an audience effect
Rumpf et al. Perinatal acoustic communication in birds: why do birds vocalize in the egg?
Kime et al. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs
Blaich et al. Alarm call responsivity of mallard ducklings: VIII. Interaction between developmental history and behavioral context
Bang et al. Asymmetrical stimulus generalization following differential fear conditioning
MARGULIS Relationships among parental inbreeding, parental behaviour and offspring viability in oldfield mice
Paul et al. Examining affective structure in chickens: valence, intensity, persistence and generalization measured using a Conditioned Place Preference Test
Fernández-Vargas et al. Singing, allogrooming, and allomarking behaviour during inter-and intra-sexual encounters in the Neotropical short-tailed singing mouse (Scotinomys teguina)
Heffner et al. Conditioned suppression/avoidance as a procedure for testing hearing in birds: The domestic pigeon (Columba livia)
Denenberg Effects of age and early experience upon conditioning in the C57BL/10 mouse
Schaefer et al. Behavioural and heart rate responses to stressors in two populations of little penguins that differ in levels of human disturbance and predation risk
Wehmann et al. The sound and the fury—Bees hiss when expecting danger
Chaby et al. Stress during adolescence shapes performance in adulthood: Context‐dependent effects on foraging and vigilance
Rao et al. Strain-and context-based 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations and anxiety behaviour in the Wistar-Kyoto rat
NL2021267B1 (en) Method and system for suppressing stress in livestock