NL2004962C2 - Pipeline inspection tool with double spiral emat sensor array. - Google Patents

Description

Pipeline Inspection Tool with Double Spiral EMAT Sensor Array

Reference to Pending Applications

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/230,879, filed August 3, 2009, and U.S. Non-Provisional Patent Application No. 12/572,752, filed on 5 October 2, 2009, which in turn claimed priority to U.S.

Provisional Patent Application No. 61/220,734, filed June 26, 2009.

Field of the Invention 10 This invention relates generally to inspection tools designed to detect anomalies in tubing, piping and pipelines and, more particularly, to inline inspection tools employing magnetic flux leakage detection techniques.

15 Background of the Invention

Many installed pipelines may be inspected using the Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) technique, primarily for the purpose of identifying metal loss anomalies. Magnetic flux leakage has been shown to respond in predictable ways to anomalies in the 20 wall of the pipeline as the principal axis of the metal loss anomaly and field angle are varied. Both experimental and modeling results have been used to confirm this effect, which is also widely described in the literature.

Due in part to limitations imposed by data acquisition, 25 data storage and magnetic circuit designs, most in-line inspection tools have employed axially oriented magnetizers (see e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,820,653 to Schempf et al.). However, the present axial field magnetizer designs make identification and quantification of extremely narrow axial features difficult, or 30 in some cases, impossible. For these feature classes, a solution using a magnetic field in the circumferential or transverse direction, have been marketed and placed in service over the past decade by pipeline inspection providers. However, due to the constraints of physics, the performance and accuracy 35 of these transverse magnetic flux inspection (TFI) tools in general is less than that of axial field tools for general metal loss anomalies.

2

Additionally, these TFI tools typically require a minimum of two magnetizer assemblies in order to achieve adequate coverage, making it impractical or difficult to incorporate these into an existing axial MFL tool.

5 For those pipelines that may have extremely narrow metal loss features, or certain classes of seam weld anomalies, standard axial field tools do not provide adequate detection and quantification capabilities. In these cases, for MFL based tools, either the initial or supplemental surveys are performed 10 using a TFI tool. While TFI tools may be capable of detecting extremely narrow anomalies and certain seam weld anomalies, they also detect all of the remaining volumetric metal loss features typically found in pipelines, complicating the process of identifying the targeted anomaly classes.

15 One of the earliest TFI arrangements is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,483,466 to Crouch et al. Crouch discloses a pair of electromagnets arranged perpendicular to each other with detectors such as magnetometers or search coils positioned on each side of the magnets. Other than the use of permanent 20 magnets and hall device-type sensors, Crouch's arrangement remains as the basis for most modern implementations. Additionally, some designs involve segmented or individual discrete magnets that, in most cases, retain the transverse or circumferential field direction. For example, U.S. Pat. No.

25 3,786,684 to Wiers et al. discloses individual magnets arranged in arrays oblique to the pipe axis with the fields of each array perpendicular the others. However, this arrangement limits the field to sections and areas between the poles of each individual magnet. Furthermore, the short pole spacing required for a 30 Wiers-type implementation decreases the length of the magnetic circuit, thereby causing the tool to suffer from velocity effects, and also masks, distorts or degrades data quality at welds, dents, or other anomalies.

Other designs involve elaborate complex geometries, 35 multiple magnetizer sections, and elaborate mechanical arrangements such as helical drives, gears and wheels designed to induce spiral or helical motion of the magnetizer section.

For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,633 to Wernicke discloses a mechanically complicated device for use with magnetizer sections 40 having two or more magnetic circuits and a plethora of sensing 3 units. In one embodiment, the magnet blocks are arranged with spirally situated parallel poles. In another embodiment, the magnet blocks are twisted pole pairs displaced axially. Both embodiments require mechanically induced rotation in order to 5 achieve full coverage of the inner pipe surface. Similar to Wernicke, U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,684 to Ramuat discloses a substantially transverse field magnetization arrangement that involves multiple magnetizer sections and a complex arrangement of wheels to induce helical motion of the sections and achieve 10 overlapping or full coverage of the pipe wall. U.S. Pat. No.

7,548,059 to Thompson et al. includes two skids (poles) that incorporate fixed magnets arranged in closely spaced pairs to create a nominally transverse field spiraling around the pipe.

This tool—which includes a variety of moving parts such as 15 supporting tendons, pulleys, and springs—requires much added complexity in order to be flexible enough to accommodate bends in the pipeline. Furthermore, the magnets in this arrangement induce a field between two parallel poles, forming a single closed loop circuit between the poles of the individual discrete 20 magnet blocks.

Similar to Thompson et al., the magnets used in the prior art are described as being blocks, with no reference to a supple or conformable upper surface used for the magnet block.

Use of.a rigid contact arrangement for the magnetic circuit 25 degrades data quality by introducing air gaps or variable reluctance zones in the magnetic field path at dents or along , welds and other upsets that may be present within the pipeline. ! i

For certain classes of features, disturbances created in the ambient field mask or otherwise distort the flux leakage signals 30 present because of the features of interest. Any magnetic anomalies existing within dents and weld zones are of greater significance due to their presence within these zones and, as such, represent areas in which data quality is critical. j

Additionally, the prior art requires the use of a large : 35 number of poles or surfaces in an intimate contact arrangement to the pipe wall surface. This arrangement can result in extremely high frictional forces or resistance to motion being experienced by the magnetizer assembly, thereby inhibiting or preventing its use in applications requiring lower friction. j 40 As already discussed, pipeline operators are currently 4 able to inspect many installed pipelines using the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technique, primarily for the purpose of identifying metal loss anomalies. However, for certain classes of anomalies, the current axial field magnetizer designs used in 5 the MFL technique make detection and quantification of extremely narrow, crack or crack-like axial features difficult or, in some cases, impossible. To enable detection and quantification of these features, alternative techniques utilizing acoustic (ultrasonic) waves have been studied or employed. These acoustic 10 waves are typically generated by external piezoelectric transducers or electro-magnetic acoustic transducers (EMAT).

EMAT implementations are usually one of two basic types: Lorentz and magnetostrictive. Both types require an external magnetic bias field to be present. In Lorentz-type 15 EMAT, the magnetic bias field is perpendicular to the pipe wall and interacts with Eddy current-induced paths or strains in the pipe wall. The magnetostrictive-type EMAT uses a magnetic bias field that is in the pipe wall plane, axial or circumferential, and interacts with magnetically induced strains.

20 It is well known in the nondestructive testing industry that magnetostriction in steel is much more efficient in generating shear horizontal (SH) acoustic waves when the magnetic bias field is at an angle with respect to the sensor coil conductors of the EMAT. This result has been verified by 25 the inventors during initial development of an EMAT sensor array according to the invention disclosed herein. During the study it was discovered that several of the notches machined into test plates were not detectable using an axially oriented magnetic bias field. Rotating the magnetic bias field angle relative to 30 the axis of travel and the EMAT sensor provided an increase of approximately 20 decibels in measured signal. This arrangement produced a much greater signal response compared to the electronic noise, resulting in distinct crack indications above a relatively uniform baseline.

35 Consequently SH wave applications using EMAT sensor coils that are set at an angle to the magnetic field, are usually superior to applications where the field plane lines are parallel to the sensor coil conductors (see e.g. DE Pat. App.

Pub. No. 10/2007/0058043 assigned to Rosen Swiss AG). Detection 40 and quantification of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is one of 5 the main types of anomalies targeted by this technique. In addition to SCC, which is typically axially oriented, girth welds, which are circumferentially oriented, have been known to exhibit crack-like features. Therefore, for an EMAT system to 5 be globally effective, a method is needed that is readily adaptable for detection of both axially and circumferentially oriented features .

Prior art in-line inspection tools use annular arrays of permanent magnets to magnetize the pipe in a direction that 10 is parallel to the axis of the pipe. To obtain the beneficial angle between the magnetic bias field and the sensor coils, the sensor coils are rotated toward the pipe axis (see e.g.,

Canadian Pat. Appl. No. CA 2,592,094 of Alers et al.). The SH waves impinge on the plane of the axially oriented SCC at this 15 same angle. Therefore, SH wave reflections from SCC are detected efficiently only by receiver sensor coils that are positioned lateral to and rotated toward the transmitter coil. Also, the attenuation measurements used for detection of coating disbond use receiver coils that are positioned diagonally to and rotated 20 toward the transmitter coils. These attenuation receiver coils are shifted circumferentially so that they are in-line with the transmitted wave. An appreciable increase in received signal amplitude is an indication a coating disbond.

There is a need for an EMAT tool that provides full 25 coverage of the inner pipe wall surface without the need for mechanically complicated structures and produces a field that may be used with EMAT sensors to detect axially- or circumferentially-oriented volumetric features and coating disbonds .

30

Summary of the Invention A pipeline inspection tool made according to this invention includes at least two pole magnets arranged about an external surface of the tool body and oriented oblique to the 35 central longitudinal axis of the tool body. A sensor array is provided between the opposing edges of the two pole magnets.

The sensor array includes a line or set of sensor coils that are oriented at a different angle than the pole magnets relative to the longitudinal axis of the tool body. Therefore, the sensor 40 array is at an angle with respect to the magnetic bias field 6 generated by the pole magnets. The pole magnets and the sensor array may each extend the length of the tool body and have a general helical-shape. Preferably, the sensor coil sets are perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tool body but, 5 depending on the type of anomaly to be detected, may be arranged parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tool body.

Each sensor coil set may lie 180° opposite a corresponding sensor coil set, with a portion of the opposing sensor coil sets contained within a common circumferential band 10 of the tool. Sensor coil sets lying on a same side of the tool body are offset from one another, being generally evenly spaced apart and equidistant from the opposing edges of the oblique-oriented pole magnets. Each set of sensor coils includes at least one transmitter coil and at least two opposing pairs of 15 receiver coils. One receiver coil in each pair may be a RD

receiver coil and the other receiver coil may be a RA receiver coil. Because the sensor coil sets are rotated relative to the magnetic bias field, the receiver coils are in-line with, and have the same angular orientation as, the transmitter coil. In 20 other words, the receiver coils are oriented parallel to the transmitter coil and do not need to be shifted diagonally or rotated with respect to the transmitter coil.

The transmitter coil transmits a tone burst or signal that impinges upon the wall of the tubular member being 25 inspected and travels back to the receivers. The receiver coils are spaced relative to the transmitter coil so that the signal transmitted by the transmitter coil does not mask detection of the reflected signal by the receiver coils. Each receiver coil is gated to receive these reflected signals—which may be 30 normalized—within a targeted sampling zone and detect anomalies in the tubular member. The transmitter may then transmit a second signal after the first signal has travelled a predetermined number of times around the circumference of the tubular member. Depending on the orientation of the sensor coil 35 sets relative to the oblique-oriented magnets, the sensor array is capable of detecting wall anomalies in both the axial and circumferential direction.

It is an object of this invention to provide a magnetic flux leakage (MFL) tool that responds to a broad range of 40 anomalies capable of generating magnetic flux leakage signals.

7

Another object of this invention is to provide a MFL tool capable of 360° coverage of the internal pipe wall using a single magnetizer without the need for multiple magnetizer sections, magnetizers, or relative motion between the sensors or 5 sections to achieve detection of nominally axially oriented features. It is another object of this invention to provide a MFL tool with an EMAT array that reduces the probability of missing cracks in the pipe wall and has improved sensitivity to small defects, i.e., up to 20 db increase in signal amplitude.

10 Yet another object of this invention is to provide an EMAT array that requires a substantial decrease in RF pulser power requirements. Still yet another object of this invention is to provide an EMAT array that includes self-calibration of the transmitted signals using the receiver coils closest to 15 transmitter coils. A further object of this invention is to provide an EMAT array that experiences less interference between transmitters caused by acoustic ring around.

Brief Description of the Drawings 20 FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an axially oriented magnetizer design. The direction of the magnetic field is circumferential or transverse to the longitudinal axis of the pipe.

FIG. 2 is an isometric view of an embodiment of an 25 oblique magnetizer assembly according to this invention that utilizes a spiral magnet pole design. The pole magnets are rotated or spiraled about 30° and include a flexible or conformable upper surface.

FIG. 3 is a view of another embodiment of the oblique 30 magnetizer assembly in which the pole magnets are rotated about 60°.

FIG. 4 is a view of yet another embodiment of the oblique magnetizer assembly in which the pole magnets are rotated about 90°.

35 FIG. 5 is a view of still yet another embodiment of the oblique magnetizer assembly in which the pole magnets are rotated about 120°.

FIG. 6 is a view of yet another embodiment of the oblique magnetizer assembly in which the pole magnets are 40 rotated about 150°.

8 FIG. 7 is an end view of another embodiment of the oblique magnetizer assembly, illustrating the relationship between the two ends of the spiraled or rotated pole magnets.

In this example, the pole magnets are rotated about 135°. The 5 conformable upper surface of each pole magnet includes a bristle or brush-type surface.

FIG. 8 illustrates field results from the oblique magnetizer arrangement. The field direction is diagonal, or oblique, to the longitudinal axis of the pipe.

10 FIG. 9 is a view of an embodiment of the oblique magnetizer assembly that includes a helical-shaped sensor array mounted from one end of the magnetizer to the other, providing complete coverage of the internal pipe wall surface and incorporating a degree of overlap to accommodate any tool 15 rotation that may take place.

FIG. 10 is a view of the oblique magnetizer assembly of FIG. 8 encased in a pipe section.

FIG. 11 is a view of an inline inspection tool that includes the oblique magnetizer assembly, an axial magnetizer 20 and a deformation sensing section.

FIG. 12 is a schematic illustrating one side of a sensor array that includes two lines or sets of EMAT sensor coils located between two oblique-oriented pole magnets. Each sensor coil set includes two pairs of receiver coils and a 25 transmitter coil located in-between the pairs of receiver coils.

The sets are aligned perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis of the inline inspection tool (and, therefore, perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis of the tubular member being inspected) and each coil in the set shares a -common 30 centerline with the other coils in the set.

FIG. 13 is a view of one side of a sensor array having the EMAT sensor coil arrangement of FIG. 12 as applied to a 24 inch diameter tubular member.

35 Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

Preferred embodiments of a magnetic flux leakage (MFL) tool made according to this invention will now be described by making reference to the drawings and the following elements illustrated in the drawings : 40 9 10 In-line inspection tool 65 Second end of 61 20 MFL tool / oblique 67 Longitudinal centerline of magnetizer 61 21 Cylindrical tool body 69 Conformable upper surface 23 First end of 21 71 Brushes 25 Second end of 21 80 Magnetic field 27 Longitudinal axis of 21 81 Magnetic flux path of field 80 31 Radial disc 90 Sensor array 40 Magnetic circuit 91 First end of 90 41 Pole magnet 93 Second end of 90 43 First end of 41 94 Sensor coil line or set of 95, 97 & 98 45 Second end of 41 95 Transmitter coil 47 Longitudinal centerline of 96 Shear horizontal wave 41 generated by 95 49 Conformable upper surface 97 RD receiver coil 51 Brushes 98 RA receiver coil 61 Pole magnet 99 Central axis of sensor coil set 94 63 First end of 61 100 Axial magnetizer 110 Deformation sensing section

Referring first to FIG. 1, a north pole magnet 41 and a south pole magnet 61 are arranged about 180° opposite one another on a cylindrical tool body 21 so that the respective longitudinal centerline 47, 67 of each pole magnet 41, 61 is 5 parallel to the longitudinal centerline 27 of the cylindrical tool body 21 (and therefore parallel to a central longitudinal axis of the pipe being inspected). Although pole magnets 41, 61 differ from prior art implementations in that, for example, each j magnet 41, 61 extends along the entire length of the cylindrical 10 body 21, their axial orientation as illustrated here is typical of prior art implementations. Arranged in this way, pole magnets 41, 61 generate a circumferential or transverse magnetic field relative to the pipe wall—as illustrated by magnetic flux paths 81—and multiple magnetizer sections are required to provide 15 complete coverage of the internal wall surface of the pipe.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 to 6, an oblique magnetizer 10 assembly 20 according to this invention includes a magnetic circuit 40 that has two spiraled pole magnets 41, 61 arranged about 180° opposite one another on cylindrical tool body 21.

Each pole magnet 41, 61 extends between a first end 23 and 5 second end 25 of the cylindrical tool body 21. Additional pairs of spiraled pole magnets 41, 61 may also be employed, with each spiraled pole magnet 41 or 61 extending between the ends 23, 25 of cylindrical tool body 21 and spaced 360°/n from its adjacent and opposite pole magnet 61, 41 ("n" being an equal to the 10 number of pole magnets 41, 61 employed). The pole magnets 41, 61 preferably have a flexible or conformable upper surface 49, 69, respectively, that helps reduce friction forces and minimize velocity effects as the oblique magnetizer assembly 20 travels through the interior of a pipe. The conformable upper surface 15 49, 69 also allows the magnetizer assembly 20 to compress a sufficient amount in order to pass by internal obstructions, bends, and reductions in the pipe that might otherwise damage the magnetizer assembly 20 or slow or prevent its passage.

The rotation amount of the pole magnets 41, 61 depends 20 on the amount of rotation required to achieve full coverage of the internal pipe wall surface. Going through the sequence from FIG. 2 to FIG. 6, the pole magnets 41, 61 are each rotated or spiraled in incremental amounts, for a nominal rotation of about 150 degrees (as illustrated in FIG. 6). When rotated, the second 25 end 45, 65 of the pole magnet 41, 61 is offset by a predetermined angle or amount a relative to its respective first end 43, 63 (see FIG. 7). Because of this rotation amount a, the respective longitudinal centerline 47, 67 of each spiraled pole magnet 41, 61 is non-parallel to the central longitudinal axis 30 27 of the cylindrical tool body 21. The rotation of pole magnets 41, 61 also helps induce a sufficient amount of rotation of magnetizer assembly 20 as it travels through the interior of the pipe.

FIG. 8 illustrates the magnetic field 80 generated from 35 a prototype of oblique magnetizer assembly 20, which was configured similar to the magnetizer assembly 20 shown in the rotation sequence of FIGS. 2 to 6. Unlike prior art in-line inspection tools, the direction of magnetic field 80 is diagonal or oblique to the pipe axis rather than circumferential or 40 transverse, with magnetic flux paths 81 emanating from the poles 11 41, 61 and traveling in opposite directions to reach a corresponding pole 61, 41. The magnetic flux lines 81 generated by each pole magnet 41, 61 are guided to the path of least resistance: into the pipe wall and toward the adjacent pole 5 magnet 61, 41. The angle of the magnetic field 80 is generally perpendicular to the flux lines 81 formed by the magnetic poles 41, 61 and generally parallel to a line forming the shortest distance between the magnet poles 41, 61. The direction of magnetic field 80 within the extents of poles 41, 61 may range 10 from 30 to 60 degrees relative to the pipe axis.

Referring now to FIGS. 9 & 10 oblique magnetizer assembly 20 may include a helical-shaped sensor array 90 located substantially equidistant between rotated pole magnets 41, 61 and arranged to provide complete coverage of the internal wall 15 surface W of pipe P and accommodate any rotation of magnetizer assembly 20 that may take place. The individual sensors in sensor array 90 may be of a kind well-known in the art for detecting magnetic flux leakage signals. Sensor array 90 preferably extends between the first end 23 and second end 25 of 20 cylindrical body 21 (and therefore between the respective ends 43, 45 and 63, 65 of pole magnets 41, 61) and incorporates a degree of overlap A between a first end 91 and second end 93 of sensor array 90. The conformable upper surfaces 49, 69 of the pole magnets 41, 61 (see e.g. FIG. 6) may be in the form of 25 brushes 51, 71. Radial discs 31A & B help propel and center magnetizer assembly 20 as it moves forward in pipe P under differential pressure.

The final configuration of oblique magnetizer assembly 20 may include any current combination of data sets, including 30 but not limited to deformation, high level axial MFL, internal/external discrimination, inertial data for mapping, and low level or residual MFL. In one preferred embodiment of an inline inspection tool 10 incorporating oblique magnetizer assembly 20, the tool 10 includes an axial magnetizer 100 and a 35 deformation sensing section 110 (see FIG. 11).

Referring now to FIGS. 12 & 13, sensor array 90 includes electro-magnetic acoustic transducers (EMAT) sensor coils 95, 97 & 98 located between the opposing edges 42, 62 of the oblique-oriented permanent pole magnets 41, 61. The sensor 40 coils 95, 97 & 98 are preferably arranged in sensor coil lines 12 or sets 94a-e as defined by a respective sensor coil set central axis 99a-e. Each central axis 99a-e is generally parallel to the other axes 99a-e and oriented at a predetermined angle y relative to the central longitudinal axis 27 of cylindrical tool 5 body 21. A substantially identical set of sensor coil sets (not shown) to sensor coil sets 94a-e is arranged on the opposing external surface of cylindrical tool body 21, about 180° opposite sensor coil sets 94a-e.

The oblique-oriented pole magnets 41, 61 are generally 10 at an angle (3 relative to central longitudinal axis 27, with angle (3 being different than angle y. Because the flux lines 81 generated by pole magnets 41, 61 are generally perpendicular to the edges 42, 62 of the pole magnets 41, 61, magnetic field 80 is rotated at an angle s relative to the central longitudinal 15 axis 21 and, therefore, is at an angle with respect to sensor coil sets 94a-e. In a preferred embodiment, angle y is about 90°, angle (3 is about 45°, and angle s is about 45°.

Arranging the sensor coil sets 94a-e perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis 27 of cylindrical tool body 21 20 (and therefore perpendicular to the pipe axis) allows sensor array 90 to detect features in both the axial and circumferential directions. Transmitter coils 95 generate SH waves 96 that travel circumferentially around the pipe and impinge at a normal angle (perpendicular) to axially oriented 25 cracks. Arranging the sensor coil sets 94a-e parallel to the central longitudinal axis 27 of the cylindrical tool body 21 (and therefore parallel to the pipe axis) allows sensor array 90 to detect features in the circumferential direction. Shear horizontal waves 96 are transmitted along the pipe wall in the 30 axial direction so that reflections from transverse cracks, such as cracks in girth welds, are detected. Unlike the orientation of receivers in prior art EMAT tools, receiver coils 97, 98 do not have to be shifted diagonally with respect to, or rotated toward, the transmitter coil 95 in order to gain the benefits of 35 having magnetic field 80 rotated with respect to the EMAT sensor coils 95, 97 & 98.

Sensor coils 95, 97 & 98 may be mounted on a suitable mechanism such as a spring loaded pads (not shown) that keep the coils 95, 97 & 98 in close proximity to the inside diameter of 40 the pipe. The transmitter coils 95 induce SH guided waves 96 in 13 two circumferential directions around the pipe. The receiver coils 97 detect reflections from stress corrosion cracks (SCC) and serve as the calibration receivers. Receiver coils 98 detect the SH guided waves 96 that propagate from the transmitter coils 5 95 in the circumferential direction. The characteristic features of these detected signals, such as amplitude and time of arrival, can be used to detect features such as coating disbond, corrosion and SCC.

The receiver coils 97, 98 are placed at a predetermined 10 distance from transmitter coil 95 so that signal responses are detected by receiver coils 97, 98 but not affected adversely by the initial electronic excitation pulse. Each transmitter coil 95 in a set 94a—e is grouped with two receiver coils 97, 98 on each side. Sensor array 90 preferably includes the requisite 15 number of transmitter coils 95 and receiver coils 97, 98 in order to provide overlapping coverage of SCC and coating disbond detection. In one preferred embodiment, each of two sensor arrays 90—arranged opposite one another and for use in a 24-inch diameter pipe—included five transmitter coils 95 and 20 total 20 receiver coils 97, 98.

Each transmitter coil 95 when fired causes SH guided waves 96 to propagate to both to the left and to the right of the coil 95 and around the circumference of the pipe. The receiver coils 97, 98 closest to the active transmitter coil 95 25 are first sampled in time (gated) to receive the outgoing waves

96 and then gated at a longer predetermined time delay, preferably on the order of 50 and 90 microseconds for a 24-inch diameter pipe, to detect reflections from SCC. These reflections are from targeted sampling zones "Z" located between the RD

30 receiver coils 97 and a predetermined distance "D" past the RA receiver coils 98 so as to maximize coverage and minimize interference. The reflection signals are normalized, i.e., divided by the outgoing signals detected in the RD receivers 97 to provide continuous calibration of the signal reflections.

35 By way of example, considering a 24-inch pipe and a target axial sample spacing of 6 mm (0.24 in.), a pulse rate of 390 Hz will yield an axial resolution of 5.1 mm (0.20 in.).

This pulse rate allows the SH wave 96 to travel approximately 4.25 times around the pipe circumference before the second pulse 40 or tone burst is fired. Consequently, the remnants of the first 14 pulse are between the receiver coils 97, 98 and therefore have no affect on the receiver coils 97, 98 located on the opposite side of tool body 21 within that circumferential ring at the sampling time interval (gate).

5 The SH waves 96 are still within the receiver gates during the third tone burst, after the wave 96 has traveled about 8.5 times around the pipe. Using an attenuation factor of 0.8 in 2 feet of travel (a factor determined from lab experiments), a tone burst transmitted at 100 percent full scale 10 has an amplitude of less than 0.3 percent when it arrives at the receiver coils 97, 98 located on the opposite side of the cylindrical tool body 21. This amount of noise is usually negligible compared to other sources of noise, e.g., thermal electronic noise, which can be as much as 3 percent of full 15 scale.

Coating disbond is detected in the targeted sampling zones Z between RD receiver coils 97 and RA receiver coils 98 which are located in-line with the transmitter coils 95.

Coating disbond detection may be accomplished by computing the 20 ratio of the gated receiver signals. Ratios that are above a set threshold indicate a lack of coating or disbond on the pipe in a particular zone 99.

In studies conducted by the inventors, a sensor array 90 made according to this invention has shown the following 25 benefits over the prior art: • improved sensitivity to small defects, i.e., up to 20 db increase in signal amplitude; • substantial decrease in RF pulser power requirements; • full circumferential inspection coverage, reducing 30 the probability of missing cracks; • self-calibration of the transmitted signals using the receiver coils closest to transmitter coils; and • less interference between transmitter coils caused by acoustic ring around.

35 Additional configurations are possible, depending upon the pipe diameter, with differing numbers of pole magnets 41, 61, sensor coils 95, 97 & 98 and sensor arrays 90. For circumferential detection, for example, the sensor array 90 would be rotated at an oblique angle y relative to the pipe 40 axis, still being located within the angular magnetic biasing 15 field 80. In addition to SCC and crack-like features, these configurations could respond to features such as coating disbonds and metal loss. The resulting system may also be used as an EMAT-only system or combined with any of the various other 5 technologies available in in-line inspection tools, including but not limited to MFL, Deformation, Caliper, and Mapping.

While an EMAT tool that includes an oblique magnetizer and helical sensor array has been described with a certain degree of particularity, many changes may be made in the details 10 of construction and the arrangement of components without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. An EMAT tool according to this disclosure, therefore, is limited only by the scope of the attached claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.

Claims (8)

A pipeline inspection tool for inspecting an inner wall of a tubular member, the pipeline inspection tool comprising: a magnetizing assembly with a cylindrical tool body (21) and two pole magnets (41, 61) with opposite polarity; a first and a second set of sensor coils (94a-e) disposed on said cylindrical tool body (21) and between the two said pole magnets (41, 61), said first and second sets of sensor coils (94a) -e) each comprises a first and a second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) and a transmitter coil (95); wherein said transmitter coil (95) and said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) are each arranged parallel to each other and share a common lateral center line, said transmitter coil (95) is disposed between said first and second pair receiver coils (97, 98); characterized in that each pole magnet (41, 61) extends helically about and along the length of said cylindrical tool body (21) and creates a single spiral magnetic field (80) around said cylindrical tool body (21) wherein said first and second set of sensor coils (94a-e) are each placed on an external surface of the inspection tool and arranged obliquely relative to opposite edges (42, 62) of said two pole magnets (41, 61) . A pipeline inspection tool according to claim 1, characterized in that said first and second coil sensor sets (94a-e) are positioned opposite one another on opposite sides of said cylindrical tool body (21). 3. Pipeline inspection tool according to claim 5, characterized in that a part of said first sensor coil set (94a-e) and a part of said 2004962 second sensor coil set (94a-e) are shifted relative to each other in a longitudinal direction. A pipeline inspection tool according to claim 1, characterized by a sampling area Z that overlaps said first and second receiver coils (97, 98) in each sensor coil set (94a-e) and extends beyond said second receiver coil (98). The pipeline inspection tool of claim 1, further comprising that each of said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) is spaced from said transmitter coil such that a signal transmitted through the transmitter coil (95) is transmitted and is reflected by the tubular member is detected by said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98). The pipeline inspection tool of claim 1, further comprising that said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) each include a direct receiver coil and a attenuation receiver coil. The pipeline inspection tool of claim 1, further comprising that at least one receiver coil (97, 98) in said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) is provided with a port. 8. Pipeline inspection tool according to claim 1, wherein at least one receiver coil (97, 98) in each of said first and second pair of receiver coils (97, 98) is a calibration coil. 2004962