NL1035516C1 - Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria - Google Patents

Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria Download PDF

Info

Publication number
NL1035516C1
NL1035516C1 NL1035516A NL1035516A NL1035516C1 NL 1035516 C1 NL1035516 C1 NL 1035516C1 NL 1035516 A NL1035516 A NL 1035516A NL 1035516 A NL1035516 A NL 1035516A NL 1035516 C1 NL1035516 C1 NL 1035516C1
Authority
NL
Netherlands
Prior art keywords
results
sorting
subsets
distance
additional criteria
Prior art date
Application number
NL1035516A
Other languages
Dutch (nl)
Inventor
Dave John Dronrijp
Emile Cornelis Dronrijp
Original Assignee
Dave John Dronrijp
Emile Cornelis Dronrijp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=39777248&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=NL1035516(C1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Dave John Dronrijp, Emile Cornelis Dronrijp filed Critical Dave John Dronrijp
Priority to NL1035516A priority Critical patent/NL1035516C1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of NL1035516C1 publication Critical patent/NL1035516C1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/903—Querying
    • G06F16/9038—Presentation of query results
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/29—Geographical information databases

Abstract

The method involves sorting a set of search results by a distance from an entered location and dividing the sorted set of results into a group of subsets of results. The subsets are sorted according to additional criteria such that the subset with the smallest distances to an imported location priority is displayed.

Description

Sorteringwijze van zoekresultaten bestaande uit locatiesSorting method of search results consisting of locations

De onderhavige uitvinding heeft betrekking op de sorteringwijze van zoekresultaten bestaande uit locaties. Meer in het bijzonder heeft de onderhavige uitvinding 5 betrekking op de sorteringwijze van zoekresultaten bestaande uit locaties, waarbij meerdere sorteringenteria de sortering bepalen en één van de sorteringcriteria de afstand tot een bepaalde locatie(s) is.The present invention relates to the sorting method of search results consisting of locations. More in particular, the present invention relates to the sorting method of search results consisting of locations, wherein several sorting centers determine the sorting and one of the sorting criteria is the distance to a specific location (s).

Na een zoekactie in een zoekmachine naar locaties worden de resultaten veelal gesorteerd op basis van de afstand die zij tot een ingevoerde locatie hebben.After a search in a search engine for locations, the results are usually sorted based on the distance they have to an entered location.

10 Achterliggende gedachte is hierbij dat de zoeker niet alle resultaten zal aflopen, maar dat deze zodanig wordt gepresenteerd dat de gebruiker sneller zal stuiten op het gewenste resultaat. Sortering heeft dan ook betrekking op een presentatiewijze dusdanig dat de zoeker geneigd zal zijn een meer gewenst resultaat te kiezen boven een minder gewenst resultaat. In veel gevallen zal de sortering bestaan uit een lijst 15 waarbij de resultaten onder elkaar staan. Het bovenste resultaat wordt hierbij als meest gewenste resultaat gezien en meer aflopend naar beneden in de lijst worden de resultaten als steeds minder gewenst beschouwd. De definitie van wat gewenst is, is vrij te bepalen en om te zetten in sorteringcriteria. In veel gevallen is echter bij een zoekactie naar locaties de kortste afstand tot de ingevoerde locatie het meest 20 gewenst.The underlying idea here is that the viewfinder will not expire all results, but that it is presented in such a way that the user will encounter the desired result more quickly. Sorting therefore relates to a presentation method such that the seeker will be inclined to choose a more desirable result over a less desired result. In many cases, the sorting will consist of a list 15 in which the results are below each other. The top result is seen as the most desired result and more descending down the list, the results are considered less and less desired. The definition of what is desired can be freely determined and converted into sorting criteria. In many cases, however, the shortest distance to the entered location is most desirable in a location search.

Vaak is echter alleen sortering op afstand tot een ingevoerde locatie niet voldoende en zal men binnen deze sortering nog een onderscheid willen maken op één of meerdere additionele criteria die extra prioriteit krijgen. Door deze extra prioriteit zullen de resultaten die aan deze criteria voldoen boven de overige 25 resultaten verschijnen.Often, however, only remote sorting to an entered location is not sufficient and within this sorting one will want to make a distinction between one or more additional criteria that receive extra priority. Because of this extra priority, the results that meet these criteria will appear above the other 25 results.

Nadeel hiervan kan zijn dat bij een groot aantal resultaten dat voldoet aan de additionele criteria, deze criteria de overhand krijgen in de sortering van de resultaten en de overige resultaten moeilijk terug te vinden zullen zijn. Sortering op basis van afstand boet hiermee aan belang in.A disadvantage of this can be that with a large number of results that meet the additional criteria, these criteria will prevail in the sorting of the results and the other results will be difficult to find. Sorting based on distance reduces the importance of interest.

30 Het doel van de uitvinding is om een dusdanige weergave van de resultaten te verkrijgen dat een betere balans tussen de verschillende criteria kan worden verkregen en niet een additioneel criterium de overhand krijgt in de sortering van de resultaten.The object of the invention is to obtain such a representation of the results that a better balance between the different criteria can be obtained and not an additional criterion prevails in the sorting of the results.

1035516 21035516 2

Bovengenoemd doel van de uitvinding wordt bereikt door de gehele resultatenset eerst te sorteren op afstand tot de ingevoerde locatie (op volgorde van afstand) en deze vervolgens, uitgaande van deze sortering, op te splitsen in subsets van een x aantal resultaten. Van belang is hierbij een aantal resultaten te kiezen, 5 dusdanig dat er een goede balans wordt verkregen tussen het aantal resultaten dat voldoet aan de additionele criteria en het aantal resultaten dat hier niet aan voldoet. Vervolgens kan binnen de subset sortering op de additionele criteria plaatsvinden. In de weergave van de resultaten zal de subset met de kleinste afstanden tot de ingevoerde locatie met voorrang worden getoond.The above object of the invention is achieved by first sorting the entire result set by distance to the entered location (in order of distance) and then, based on this sorting, splitting it into subsets of an x number of results. It is important to choose a number of results in such a way that a good balance is obtained between the number of results that meet the additional criteria and the number of results that do not meet these. Subsequently, sorting on the additional criteria can take place within the subset. In the display of the results, the subset with the smallest distances to the entered location will be shown with priority.

10 Voordeel van deze methode van weergeven is dat het aantal resultaten dat niet voldoet aan de additionele criteria toch vroeg in de sortering tevoorschijn komen.The advantage of this method of displaying is that the number of results that do not meet the additional criteria still appear early in the sorting.

10355161035516

Claims (1)

1. Sorteringwijze van zoekresultaten bestaande uit locaties, waarbij meerdere sorteringcriteria de sortering bepalen en één van de sorteringcriteria de afstand 5 tot een bepaalde locatie(s) is, met het kenmerk dat de gehele resultatenset eerst wordt gesorteerd op afstand tot de ingevoerde locatie en deze vervolgens uitgaande van deze sortering wordt opgesplitst in subsets van een x aantal resultaten, waarna binnen de subset sortering op de additionele criteria plaatsvindt en de subset met de kleinste afstanden tot de ingevoerde locatie 10 met voorrang wordt getoond. 1 03 55 1 61. Sorting method of search results consisting of locations, wherein several sorting criteria determine the sorting and one of the sorting criteria is the distance to a specific location (s), characterized in that the entire result set is first sorted by distance from the entered location and this then starting from this sorting, subsets of an x number of results are subdivided, whereafter within the subset sorting takes place on the additional criteria and the subset with the smallest distances to the entered location 10 is shown with priority. 1 03 55 1 6
NL1035516A 2008-06-03 2008-06-03 Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria NL1035516C1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1035516A NL1035516C1 (en) 2008-06-03 2008-06-03 Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1035516A NL1035516C1 (en) 2008-06-03 2008-06-03 Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria
NL1035516 2008-06-03

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
NL1035516C1 true NL1035516C1 (en) 2008-07-23

Family

ID=39777248

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
NL1035516A NL1035516C1 (en) 2008-06-03 2008-06-03 Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria

Country Status (1)

Country Link
NL (1) NL1035516C1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10038401A1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2001-03-01 Aisin Aw Co Navigation system with memory medium has search device for conducting search of surroundings based on stored, entered data; recording points are associated with area information
US20030163467A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-08-28 Robert Cazier Metric based reorganization of data
WO2006014439A2 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-02-09 Jiwire Hotspot location record database
EP1857944A1 (en) * 2006-05-15 2007-11-21 Research In Motion Limited Information search dependent on the position and direction of a portable electronic device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10038401A1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2001-03-01 Aisin Aw Co Navigation system with memory medium has search device for conducting search of surroundings based on stored, entered data; recording points are associated with area information
US20030163467A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-08-28 Robert Cazier Metric based reorganization of data
WO2006014439A2 (en) * 2004-07-06 2006-02-09 Jiwire Hotspot location record database
EP1857944A1 (en) * 2006-05-15 2007-11-21 Research In Motion Limited Information search dependent on the position and direction of a portable electronic device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Albuquerque et al. Relative age effect in Olympic Judo athletes: A weight category analysis
WO2017092622A1 (en) Legal provision search method and device
Chebli et al. The impact of the effectiveness of sponsorship on image and memorizing: Role of congruence and relational proximity
WO2008086032A3 (en) Method and apparatus for classifying multimedia artifacts using ontology selection and semantic classification
Inoguchi Japanese politics today: From karaoke to kabuki democracy
EP2458334A3 (en) Road estimation device and method for estimating road
CN106471494B (en) Program, apparatus and method for analyzing effect of promotion site on user's psychological state transition
Jenkinson et al. The appressorium of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae remains mitotically active during post-penetration hyphal growth
Ben-Porat et al. Unpacking secularization: Structural changes, individual choices and ethnic paths
NL1035516C1 (en) Search result sorting method, involves sorting set of results by distance from entered location and dividing sorted set of results into group of subsets of results, and sorting subsets according to additional criteria
EP2651095A3 (en) Scalable packet classification using associative memory
WO2014103016A1 (en) Sales system, sales apparatus, sales program, computer-readable recording medium on which sales program is recorded, and sales method
정병희 et al. IPA evaluation about IT services for tourists in Smart tourism
Chung et al. A Conceptualize of Cultural Ecosystem Service Recreational Benefits: A Systematic Review Method
WATANABE et al. Expansion of Design Fields Based on The Trends in Design Award
Kokal Hope for Justice
Ueda Education and intergenerational earnings transmission: the case of Japan and South Korea
Lee Dynamic Interactive Relationships among Advertising Cost and Customer Types of Social Network Game
RU2016117399A (en) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIMPLIFICATION OF DATA ENTRANCE FOR INFORMATION SYSTEM
Chou Database comparison between Web of Science and Scopus: A case of educational technology journals
Vokhmiakova ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS THAT DETERMINE CUSTOMER VALUE OF SAINT PETERSBURG AMONG THE YOUTH
Efendi et al. Study Of Automotive Brands Popularity In Indonesia Using Twitter Data
Cviklová A COMPARISON OF HARASSMENT AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AS A POINT OF DEPARTURE FOR FUTURE EUROPEAN POLICIES
Jamil The limits of the Judicialization: Critical review of London's employment tribunal.
Ayobi A model for evaluation and ranking Iran universities by composite index

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD1N Patents in respect of which a request for novelty search has been filed

Opponent name: D.J. DRONRIJP

RD1A Patents in respect of which a request for advice has been filed [in relation to nullification]

Effective date: 20100302

RD1N Patents in respect of which a request for novelty search has been filed

Effective date: 20091116

SD Assignments of patents

Effective date: 20100426

RD2A Patents in respect of which a decision has been taken or a report has been made (for advice)

Effective date: 20100820

RDX Appeal against the reestablishment of rights

Effective date: 20101004

V1 Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20130101

RD1C Appeal to court

Effective date: 20101109