MXPA99005065A - Fungicidal active substance combinations - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention concerns novel active substance combinations comprising a compound of formula (I) with known fungicidal active substances. The invention also concerns their use in combating phytopathogenic fungi.

Description

COMBINATIONS OF FUNGICIDAL ACTIVE PRODUCTS FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present application relates to new combinations of active products, which are constituted by a compound of the formula (I) and other known fungicidal active compounds which are very suitable for the control of phytopathogenic fungi.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION • It is already known that the compounds of the formula (I) have fungicidal properties (DE-19 602 095). The activity of this product is good; however, in some cases it leaves much to be desired on the occasion of Ref .: 30267 low application quantities. It is also already known that a large number of azole derivatives, aromatic derivatives of carboxylic acids, morpholine compounds and other heterocycles can be used for the control of fungi (see KH Büchel "Pflanzenschutz und Schadlingsbekampfung" pages 87, 136, 140, 141 and 146 to 153, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1977). The effect of the referred products, however, is not always satisfactory at low application rates.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION It has now been found that the new combinations of active products, constituted by a compound of the formula (I) and for at least one mixing component (A) Antracol (propineb) and / or (B) Euparen (Dichlofluanid) and / or Euparen M (Tolylfluanid) and / or (C) Bitertanol and / or (D) Tebuconazole and / or (E) Triadimefon and / or ( F) Triadi enol and / or (G) Imidacloprid and / or (H) Sumisclex and / or (II) Mancozeb and / or (K) Folpet (Phaltan) and / or (L) Di etomorph and / or (M) Cymoxanil and / or (N) Metalaxyl and / or (O) Aliette (fosetyl-Al) and / or (P) Fa oxadone and / or (Q) Pyrimethanil and / or (R) Cyprodinyl and / or (S) Mepanipyri and / or (T) Kresoximmethyl and / or (U) Azoxystrobin and / or (V) Epoxiconazole and / or () Metconazole and / or (X) Fluguinconazole and / or (Y) Fludioxonil and / or (Z) Fenpiclonil and / or ( a) Guazatine and / or (ß) Bion and / or (?) 1-methylethyl ester of [2-Methyl-l- [[[1- (4-methylphenyl) ethyl) amino) carbonyl) -propyl] - carboxylic and / or (d) 8-t-Butyl-2- (N-ethyl-Nn-propyl-amino) -methyl-1,4-dioxaspiro [5, 4] -decano and / or (e) 2, 3 -Dichloro-4- (1-methylcyclohexylcarbonylamino) -phenol and / or (?) N- (R) - [1- (4-chloro-phenyl) -ethyl] -2,2-dichloro-l-ethyl-3t- methyl-lr-cyclopropane-carboxamide and / or (p) fluaz inam and / or (III) capture and / or (IV) Monceren (Pencycuron) and / or (VI) Fenpiclonil, have very good fungicidal properties, which complement each other synergistically. The active compound of the formula (I) is known (DE-19 602 095) The components also present in the combinations according to the invention are also known The combinations of active compounds according to the invention contain, in addition to the compound of the formula ( I), at least one active product of the compounds (A) to (VI) In addition, other mixture components with fungicidal activity may also be present When the active compounds are present in the active compound combinations according to the invention in certain proportions by weight, the synergistic effect is particularly evident, however the proportions by weight of the active compounds can vary within wide limits in the combinations of active ingredients, in general corresponding to a part by weight of the active compound of the formula (I), from 0.01 to 50, preferably from 0.25 to 20 parts - by weight of the compounds (A) to (VI). nder by weight of the compound of the formula (I), the parts by weight modified for the components of the following mixtures: (A) 1: 1 to 1:50, preferably 1: 5 to 1:20, (B) 1: 1 to 1:50, preferably 1: 1 to 1:20, (C) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (D) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (E) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (F) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (G) 20: 1 to 1:20, preferably 10: 1 to 1:10, (H) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5 : 1 to 1: 5, (II) 1: 1 to 1: 50, preferably 1: 5 to 1:20, (K) 1: 1 to 1: 50, preferably 1: 5 to 1:20, (L) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (M) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (N) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (0) 10: 1 to 1: 50, preferably 1: 1 to 1:10, (P) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (Q) 5: 1 to 1: 20 preferably 1: 1 to 1:10, (R) 5: 1 to 1: 20 preferably 1: 1 to 1:10, (S) 5: 1 to 1 20, preferably 1: 1 to 1:10, (T) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (U) 10: 1 to 1 • 10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (V) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (W) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (X) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (Y) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (Z) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (a) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (ß) 50: 1 to 1 50, preferably 20: 1 to 1:10, (?) 10: 1 to 1 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (d) 10: 1 to 1 20, preferably 5: 1 to 1:10, (e) 10: 1 to 1: 10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (?) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (p) 10: 1 to 1:10 preferably 5: 1 to 1: 5, (III) 5: 1 to 1:50, preferably 1: 1 to 1:20, (IV) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 4: 1 to 1: 4, (VI) 10: 1 to 1:10, preferably 4: 1 to 1: 4.

The active compound combinations according to the invention have very good fungicidal properties and can be used, above all, for the control of phytopathogenic fungi, such as Plasmodioforomycetes, Oomycetes, Quitridiomycetes, Cigomycetes, Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, Deuteromycetes, etc.

The active compound combinations according to the invention are particularly suitable for the control of cereal diseases, such as Erysiphe, Cochliobolus, Pyrenophora, Rhynchsporium, Septoria spp., Fusarium spp., Pseudocercosporella and Leptosphaeria, and against attack. by fungi in crops other than cereals, such as vines, fruit trees, vegetables, for example against Phytophthora, Plasmopara, Pythium, as well as against fungi of downy mildew such as, for example, Sphaerotheca or Uncinula and pathogens the leaves such as Venturia, Alternarla and Septoria as well as Rhizoctonia, Botrytis, Sclerotinia and Sclerotium.

The good compatibility with the plants of the combinations of the active products, at the concentrations necessary for the fight against plant diseases, allows a treatment of the aerial parts of the plants, seedlings and seeds and the soil. The active compound combinations according to the invention can be converted into customary formulations such as solutions, emulsions, suspensions, powders, foams, pastes, granules, aerosols, microencapsulations in polymeric materials and in seed coating compositions as well as ULV formulations. These formulations are prepared in a known manner, for example by mixing the active ingredients or combinations of the active ingredients with spreading agents, ie liquid solvents, liquefied gases which are under pressure and / or solid support materials, in case given with use of surface active agents, ie emulsifiers and / or dispersants and / or foam generating agents. In the case of the use of water as an extender agent, organic solvents can also be used as auxiliary solvents. Suitable liquid solvents are: aromatic hydrocarbons, such as xylene, toluene or alkyl-naphthalenes, golden aromatic hydrocarbons or gold aliphatic hydrocarbons. Such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylene or methylene chloride, aliphatic hydrocarbons such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example petroleum fractions, alcohols such as butanol or glycol, as well as ethers and esters, ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone, strongly polar solvents, such as dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulfoxide, as well as water. By liquefied gaseous support materials or extender agents are meant those which are gaseous at normal temperature and under normal pressure, for example propellant gases for aerosol, such as halogenated hydrocarbons as well as butane, propane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Suitable solid support materials are, for example, natural mineral flours, such as kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite montmorillonite or diatomaceous earth and synthetic mineral flours, such as highly dispersed silicic acid, aluminum oxide and silicates. Suitable solid support materials for granulates are, for example, broken minerals and fractions such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, dolomite, as well as synthetic granules formed from inorganic and organic flours as well as granules formed from organic material such as such as serrin, coconut walnut shells, aiz snouts and tobacco stalks. Suitable emulsifying agents and / or foam generators are, for example, nonionic and anionic emulsifiers, such as polyoxyethylenated fatty acid esters, for example alkyl aryl polyglycol ether, alkylsulfonates, alkyl sulfates, arylsulfonates, and albumin hydrolysates. Suitable dispersants are, for example, sulfite lignin blends and methylcellulose. They can be used in adhesive formulations such as carboxymethylcellulose, natural and synthetic polymers powdery, granular or in the form of latex, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate as well as natural phospholipids, such as cefaliña and lecithin and synthetic phospholipids. Other additives can be mineral and vegetable oils. Dyes such as inorganic pigments, for example iron oxide, titanium oxide, ferrocyanide blue and organic colorants such as alizarin, azo and metal phthalocyanine dyes and trace nutrients, such as iron, manganese salts, of boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum, zinc. The formulations generally contain between 0.1% and 95% by weight of active compound, preferably between 0.5 and 90%. The active compound combinations according to the invention can be present in the formulations in mixtures with other active ingredients such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides and herbicides, as well as in mixtures with fertilizers or plant growth regulators. The active compound combinations can be used as such in the form of their formulations or of the forms of application prepared from the above, such as ready-to-use solutions, emulsifiable concentrates, emulsions, suspensions, injectable powders, soluble powders and granules. The employment is carried out in the usual way; for example by irrigating, pulverizing, dusting, spreading, applying by brush, disinfected in dry, disinfected in wet disinfected by soaking, disinfected in suspension or incrustation. When treating parts of plants, concentrations of active products can vary in application forms within wide limits. These are generally between 1 and 0.0001% by weight, preferably between 0.5 and 0.001%. In the case of the treatment of the seeds, amounts of active compound of 1 are generally required. 0. 001 up to 50 g for each kilogram of seeds, preferably from 0.01 to 10 g. When treating the soil, active product concentrations of 0.00001 to 0.1% by weight, preferably 0.0001 to 0.02%, are required at the site of action. The good fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention follows from the following examples. While the individual active products show weakness in their fungicidal effect, the combinations present an effect that goes beyond the simple sum of the effects. A synergistic effect is present provided that the fungicidal effect of the combination of active products is greater than the sum of the effects of the active products applied individually. The expected effect for a given combination of two active products can be calculated (see Colby, S.R., "Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations", Weeds 1_5, pages 20-22, 1967) as follows: Yes X represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active product A is used in a concentration of m ppm, and Y represents the degree of activity, expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the product is used active B at a concentration of n ppm, E represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active products A and B are used in a concentration of m and n ppm, then the relation is given X.Y E = X + Y- 100 If the actual fungicidal effect is greater than calculated, then the combination is superadditive in terms of its effect, that is to say that there is a synergistic effect. In this case, the actual degree of activity observed must be greater than the value calculated from the formula previously indicated for the expected degree of activity (E): Example 1 Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

To test the protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of active product until they drip. After drying the spray application, the plants are inoculated with an aqueous spore suspension of Phytophthora infestans. The plants are placed in an incubation cabinet with a relative humidity of 100% and at approximately 20 ° C. The evaluation is carried out 3 days after the inoculation. In this case 0% means a degree of activity that corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed. The good fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention follows from the following examples. While the individual active products show weakness in their fungicidal effect, the combinations present an effect that goes beyond the simple sum of the effects.

A synergistic effect is present provided that the fungicidal effect of the combination of active products is greater than the sum of the effects of the active products applied individually. The expected effect for a given combination of two active products can be calculated (see Colby, Glycida, S.R., "Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations", Weeds 35, pages 20-22, 1967) as follows: Yes X represents the degree of activity expressed in% of untreated controls, when the active product A is used at a concentration of m ppm, Y represents the degree of activity, expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active product B is used in a concentration of n ppm, E represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active products A and B are used in a concentration of m and ppm, then the relation E = X +? - - * I 100 is given If the fungicidal effect real is greater than the calculated, then the combination is superadditive in its effect, ie there is a synergistic effect. In this case, the actual degree of activity observed must be greater than the value calculated from the formula previously indicated for the expected degree of activity (E). From the following table it can be clearly seen that the effect found of the combination of active products according to the invention is greater than that calculated, that is to say that a synergistic effect is present.

Table 1 Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 0, 5 (?) 0, 5 20 7 racemic measure of L-valine.

Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 0.5 1} 1: 1 + / 77 27 (?) 0.5 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 45 Tebuconazole 26 Mixtures according to the invention: 1 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (I) 45 Triadimenol Mixtures according to the invention: Proportion of Quantity used Degree of expected value, mix in product Activity calculated with active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5 1} 1: 1 + J 72 45 (F) 5 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% Mixtures according to the invention: 1 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 45 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in Mixtures according to the invention: Proportion of Quantity used Degree of expected value, mix in product activity calculated with the asset in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5 *} 1: 1 + / 75 64 Procy- 5 midone Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (D 45 Manco zeb 50 54 (II), C -NH - CS- Mn / H2C- -NH CS- Mixtures according to the invention: Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in (i) 20 Phaltan (K) 10 27 Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 1} l 1 + j 74 42 Phaltan 10 5 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% D imetomorph Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 1 ^ + / 1: 1 + J 49 20 Dime- 1 tomorph (L) Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 45 Cymoxanil 12 (M) O O CN CHj-CH-NH-C II-NH-C II-CI -NOCH Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5"I? + J 1: 1 + / 78 52 Cymox5 anil Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 45 Metalaxyl (N) Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5} ? 1 + / 62 46 (N) 5 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 45 Fluazinaro 11 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector, Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% Cyprodinyl (R) Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5 1} 1: 1 + J 62 45 Cyprodinyl 5 Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in Kresoxi -methyl 14 Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected Value, Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 1 1} 1: 1 + / 64 31 Kresoxi - 1 Methyl (T) Table 1 (Continued) Test with Phytophthora (tomato) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (I) 45 Bendicar (Bion) (ß) Mixtures according to the invention: Amount of Amount used Degree of expected value.

Mix in product calculated activity with the active in g / ha real Colby formula (I) 5 1} 1: 1 + 54 45 Bless 5 Use 2 Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

To test the protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of commercially available active compound at the indicated application rates. After drying the spray-applied coating, the plants are inoculated with an aqueous spore suspension of Sphaerotheca fulginea. The plants are then placed in the greenhouse at approximately 23 ° C and with a relative humidity of approximately 70%. The evaluation is carried out 10 days after the inoculation. In this case 0% means a degree of activity that corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed. The good fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention follows from the following examples. While the individual active products show weakness in their fungicidal effect, the combinations present an effect that goes beyond the simple sum of the effects. A synergistic effect is present provided that the fungicidal effect of the combination of active products is greater than the sum of the effects of the active products applied individually. The expected effect for a given combination of two active products can be calculated (see Colby, S.R., "Calculating Synergistic and 7? Ntagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations", Weeds 15, pages 20-22, 1967) as follows: Yes X represents the degree of activity expressed in% of untreated controls, when the active product A is used at a concentration of m ppm, Y represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active product B is used in a concentration of n ppm, E represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active products A and B are used in a concentration of m and n ppm, then the relation is given X x Y E = X + Y 100 If the actual fungicidal effect is greater than the calculated one, then the combination is superadditive in terms of its effect, that is to say that there is a synergistic effect. In this case, the actual degree of activity observed must be greater than the value calculated from the formula previously indicated for the expected degree of activity (E). From the following table it can be clearly seen that the effect found of the combination of active products according to the invention is greater than that calculated, that is to say that a synergistic effect is present.

Table 2 Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 2.5 22 Propineb (A) 25 45 CH, - [Zn-S-CS-NH-CH-CH-NH-CS-SJ- Mixtures according to the invention: 3 Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% Dichlof luanid 25 20 (Bl) Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% Tólylf luanid 25 22 (B2) Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% Bitertanol (C) 2.5 20 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% riadimefon (E) 2,5 30 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (X) 2, 5 22 (d) 2, 5 10 Mixtures according to the invention: Proportion of Amount used Degree of expected value, mix in product Activity calculated with asset in g / ha Colby's real formula (I) 2.5 1 +} 1: 1 + / 70 30 (d) 2.5 Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% (i) 2,5 22 Captan (III) 12.5 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in Pyrimethanil 12.5 10 Mixtures according to the invention: Table 2 (Continued) Test with Sphaerotheca (cucumber) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in Azoxystrobin 2.5 57 Mixtures according to the invention: Example 3 Test with Botrytis (beans) / protector.

To test the protective activity, young plants are sprayed with the preparation of commercially available active compound at the indicated application rates. After drying the spray applied coating, 2 pieces of agar covered with Botrytis cinerea are placed on each leaf. The inoculated plants are placed in an obscured chamber at approximately 20 ° C and a relative humidity of 100%. The magnitude of the spots produced by the attack on the leaves is evaluated after 2 days from the inoculation. In this case 0% means a degree of activity that corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed. The good fungicidal effect of the active compound combinations according to the invention follows from the following examples. While the individual active products show weakness in their fungicidal effect, the combinations present an effect that goes beyond the simple sum of the effects. A synergistic effect occurs whenever the 4 The fungicidal effect of the combination of active products is greater than the sum of the effects of the active * products applied individually. The expected effect for a given combination of two active products can be calculated (see Colby, S.R., "calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations ", Weeds 15, pages 20-22, 1967) as follows: Yes X- represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active product A is used in a concentration of m ppm, Y represents the degree of activity, expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active product B is used in a concentration of n ppm, E represents the degree of activity expressed in% of the untreated controls, when the active products A and B are used in a concentration of m and n ppm, then the relation is given X x Y E = X + Y 100 If the actual fungicidal effect is greater than the calculated one, then the combination is superadditive in terms of its effect, that is to say that there is a synergistic effect. In this case, the actual degree of activity observed must be greater than the value calculated from the formula previously indicated for the expected degree of activity (E). From the following table it can be clearly seen that the effect found of the combination of active products according to the invention is greater than that calculated, that is to say that a synergistic effect is present.

Table 3 Test with Botrytis (beans) / protector.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product g / ha in% P osethyl-Al 250 (O) Mixtures according to the invention: Example 4 Test with Fusarium nivale (wheat) / treatment of seeds. The application of the active products is carried out as a dry disinfectant agent. They are prepared by spreading the corresponding active product with mineral flour to give a fine pulverulent mixture, which guarantees a homogeneous distribution on the surface of the seeds. For disinfection, the infected seeds are shaken for 3 minutes with the disinfectant agent in a closed glass bottle. Wheat is planted at a rate of 2 x 100 grains at a depth of 1 cm in a normalized soil and is grown in the greenhouse at a temperature of about 10 ° C and with a relative humidity of 95% approximately Seedbeds, which undergo daily 15 hours of light. After 3 weeks, approximately, from the sowing the evaluation of the plants with respect to the symptoms of the white mold is carried out. In this case, 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of untreated controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 4 Test with Fusarium nivale (wheat) / treatment of seeds.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product in% mg / kg of seeds (Tebuconazole) (O) 25 20 Table 4 (Continued) Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product in% mg / kg of seeds (Triadimenol) (F) 25 52 (Pencycuron) IV 25 29 (Fenpiclonil) V 75 67 (Fludioxonil) (Y) 75 92 1 Table 4 (Continued) Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product in mg / kg of seeds Mixtures according to the invention (I) 12.5 97 (V) + 12.5 97 (I) 12.5 (F) + 12.5 93 (I) 12.5 + monceren + 12.5 100 (I) 37.5 (v) + 37.5 99 (I) 37.5 (Y) + 37.5 97 2 Example 5 Test with Rhizoctonia solani (cotton) / treatment of seeds.

The application of the active products is carried out as a dry disinfectant agent. They are prepared by spreading the corresponding active product with mineral flour to give a fine pulverulent mixture, which guarantees a homogeneous distribution on the surface of the seeds. For disinfection, the infected seeds are shaken for 3 minutes with the disinfectant agent in a closed glass bottle. The seeds are sown at a rate of 2 x 50 grains at a depth of 2 cm in a homogenous soil infected with Rhizoctonia solani and grown in the greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 22 ° C in seedbeds, which are daily subjected to 15 hours of light. After 8 days the evaluation is carried out. In this case, 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of untreated controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 5 Test with Rhizoctonia solani (cotton) / treatment of seeds.

Product Quantity used Degree of active activity of active product in% mg / kg of seeds (i) Mixtures according to the invention (I) 37.5 (F) + 37.5 63 Example 6 Test with Erysiphe (barley) / healing. Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or of the active compound combination is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the curative activity, young plants are sprinkled with spores of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei After 48 hours, from the inoculation, the plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the active product in the indicated application quantities. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 20 ° C and with an air reactive humidity of approximately 80%., to favor the development of powdery mildew pustules. After 7 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed. Table 6 Test with Erysiphe (barley) / curative Example 7 Test with Erysiphe (wheat) / healing. Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 Parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or of the active compound combination is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the curative activity, young plants are sprinkled with spores of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. tritici. After 48 hours, from the inoculation, the plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the active product in the indicated application quantities. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 20 ° C and with an approximate relative humidity of 80%, to favor the development of the powdery mildew pustules. After 7 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 7 • Example 8 Test with Leptosphaeria nodorum (wheat) / healing. Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 Parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or of the active compound combination is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the curative activity, young plants are sprinkled with a suspension of conideas of Leptosphaeria nodorum. The plants are left for 48 hours at 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of 100% in an incubation chamber and then sprinkled with the preparation of the active compound in the indicated application quantities. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 15 ° C and with a relative humidity of approximately 80%. After 10 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 8 Example 9 Test with Pyrenophora teres (barley) / healing. Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 Parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or the combination of the active compounds is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the curative activity, young plants are sprinkled with a suspension of conideas of Pyrenophora teres. The plants remain 48 hours at 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of 100% in an incubation cabin. Then the plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the active product in the indicated application quantities. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of approximately 80%. After 7 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 9 Example 10 Trial with Puccinia (wheat) / healing. Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or the combination of the active compounds is mixed with the amounts indicated solvent and emulsifier and dilute the concentrate with water to the desired concentration. To test the curative activity, young plants are sprinkled with a suspension of Conideas de Puccinia recondita. The plants remain 48 hours at 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of 100% in an incubation cabin. The plants are then sprinkled with the preparation of the active product in the indicated application quantities. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of approximately 80%, to favor the development of pustules of brown rust. After 10 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 10 Example 11 Test with Erysiphe (wheat) / protector Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or the combination of the active compounds is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the protective activity, young plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the product at the indicated application rates. After drying the spray applied coating, the plants are sprinkled with spores of Erysiphe graminis f.sp. tritici. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of approximately 80%, to favor the development of milidiú pustules. After 7 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 11 Test with Erysiphe (wheat) / protector Example 12 Test with Leptosphaeria nodorum (wheat) / protector Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or the combination of the active compounds is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the protective activity, young plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the active compound at the indicated application rates. After drying of the spray-applied coating, the plants are sprinkled with a suspension of Leptosphaeria nodorum spores. The plants remain for 48 hours at 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of 100% in an inoculation cabin. The plants are placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of approximately 15 ° C and with a relative humidity of 80%. After 10 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity, which corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 12 Test with Leptosphaeria nodorum (wheat) / protector Table 12 Test with Leptosphaeria nodorum (wheat) / protector Example 13 Test with Puccinia (wheat) / protector Solvent: 25 parts by weight of N, N-dimethylacetamide Emulsifier: 0.6 parts by weight of alkylaryl polyglycol ether.

To obtain a suitable preparation of active compound, 1 part by weight of the active compound or the combination of the active compounds is mixed with the indicated amounts of solvent and emulsifier and the concentrate is diluted with water to the desired concentration. To test the protective activity, young plants are sprinkled with the preparation of the active compound at the indicated application rates. After drying of the spray-applied coating, the plants are sprinkled with a conidial suspension of recondite Puccinia. The plants remain for 48 hours at 20 ° C and with a relative humidity of 100% in an inoculation cabin. The plants are then placed in a greenhouse at a temperature of about 20 ° C and with a relative air humidity of 80%, to favor the development of the pustules of the brown rust.

After 10 days, from the inoculation, the evaluation is carried out. In this case 0% means a degree of activity that corresponds to that of the controls, while a degree of activity of 100% means that no attack is observed.

Table 13, Table 13 Test with Puccinia (wheat) / protector It is noted that in relation to this date, the best method known by the applicant to carry out the aforementioned invention, is that which is clear from the present description of the invention. Having described the present invention property is claimed as contained in the following

Claims (6)

3 CLAIMS

1. Combinations of active products, characterized in that they contain a compound of the formula (I) and at least one mixing component (A) Antracol (propineb) and / or (E) Euparen (Dichlofluanid) and / or Euparen M (Tolylfluanid) and / or (F) Bitertanol and / or (G) Tebuconazole and / or (E) Triadimefon and / or ( F) Triadimenol and / or (G) Imidacloprid and / or (H) Sumisclex and / or (II) Mancozeb and / or (K) Folpet (Phaltan) and / or (N) Dimetomorph and / or (O) Cymoxanil and / or (N) Metalaxyl and / or (0) Aliette (fosetyl-Al) and / or (P) Famoxadone and / or (Q) Pyrimethanil and / or (R) Cyprodinyl and / or (S) Mepanipyrim and / or (T) ) Kresoximmethyl and / or (U) Azoxystrobin and / or (V) Epoxiconazole and / or (W) Metconazole and / or (X) Fluguinconazole and / or (Y) Fludioxonil and / or (Z) Fenpiclonil and / or (a) Guazatine and / or (ß) Bion and / or (?) 1-methylethyl ester of [2-Methyl-l- [[[1- (4-methylphenyl) ethyl) amino) carbonyl) -propyl] -carboxylic acid and / or (d) 8-t-Butyl-2- (N-ethyl-Nn-propyl-amino) -methyl-1,4-dioxaspiro [5, 4] -decano and / or (e) 2,3-Dichloro -4- (1-methylcyclohexylcarbonylamino) -phenol and / or ()) N- (R) - [1- (4-chloro-phenyl) -ethyl] -2,2-dichloro-l-ethyl-3-methyl- lr-cyclopropane-carboxamide and / or (p) fluazi nam and / or (III) capture and / or (IV) Monceren (Pencycuron) and / or (VI) Fenpiclonil.

2. Combination of active ingredients according to claim 1, characterized in that in the active compound combinations the weight ratio between the active compound of the formula (I) and an active compound of the groups (A) to (VI) is, respectively , from 1: 0.01 to 1:50.

3. Procedure for the fight against fungi, characterized in that combinations of products according to claim 1 are allowed to act on them and / or on their environment.

4. Use of the combinations of active products according to claim 1, for the fight against fungi.

5. Process for obtaining fungicidal agents, characterized in that combinations of active products according to claim 1 are mixed with spreaders and / or surfactants.

6. Fungicidal agents characterized in that they contain a combination of active products as defined in claim 1, as well as the usual components for the fungicidal agents.