MXPA01004202A - Method for the genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic prickly pear plants (opuntia sp.) - Google Patents
Method for the genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic prickly pear plants (opuntia sp.)Info
- Publication number
- MXPA01004202A MXPA01004202A MXPA/A/2001/004202A MXPA01004202A MXPA01004202A MX PA01004202 A MXPA01004202 A MX PA01004202A MX PA01004202 A MXPA01004202 A MX PA01004202A MX PA01004202 A MXPA01004202 A MX PA01004202A
- Authority
- MX
- Mexico
- Prior art keywords
- opuntia
- plants
- explants
- regeneration
- plant
- Prior art date
Links
- 244000192701 Opuntia sp Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 240000001439 Opuntia Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 230000001131 transforming Effects 0.000 title abstract description 34
- 230000002068 genetic Effects 0.000 title abstract description 29
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 title abstract description 17
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 17
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 210000001519 tissues Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 241000589155 Agrobacterium tumefaciens Species 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 210000004883 areola Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 101710045068 FBL Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- IXORZMNAPKEEDV-OBDJNFEBSA-N gibberellin A3 Chemical compound C([C@@]1(O)C(=C)C[C@@]2(C1)[C@H]1C(O)=O)C[C@H]2[C@]2(C=C[C@@H]3O)[C@H]1[C@]3(C)C(=O)O2 IXORZMNAPKEEDV-OBDJNFEBSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- WYXYBEOWQBGFQB-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-benzyl-7H-purin-2-amine Chemical compound N=1C=C2NC=NC2=NC=1NCC1=CC=CC=C1 WYXYBEOWQBGFQB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N Kanamycin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N 0.000 claims description 28
- 229960000318 kanamycin Drugs 0.000 claims description 28
- 241000219357 Cactaceae Species 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000002609 media Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 240000008607 Opuntia megacantha Species 0.000 claims description 13
- 240000009297 Opuntia ficus-indica Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 235000002840 Opuntia megacantha Nutrition 0.000 claims description 11
- 235000006538 Opuntia tuna Nutrition 0.000 claims description 11
- 235000004727 Opuntia ficus indica Nutrition 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 241000589158 Agrobacterium Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000006870 ms-medium Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- FPPNZSSZRUTDAP-UWFZAAFLSA-N Carbenicillin Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)C(C(O)=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 FPPNZSSZRUTDAP-UWFZAAFLSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229960003669 Carbenicillin Drugs 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007640 basal medium Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- OXFPYCSNYOFUCH-KQBHUUJHSA-N gibberellin A20 Chemical compound C([C@H]12)C[C@@](C3)(O)C(=C)C[C@@]13[C@@H](C(O)=O)[C@@H]1[C@]3(C)C(=O)O[C@@]12CCC3 OXFPYCSNYOFUCH-KQBHUUJHSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000442 meristematic Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000001172 regenerating Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 235000013389 devils tongue Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000003501 co-culture Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 102100004985 GUSB Human genes 0.000 description 21
- 108010060309 Glucuronidase Proteins 0.000 description 21
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002105 Southern blotting Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 8
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229920003013 deoxyribonucleic acid Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001404 mediated Effects 0.000 description 7
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940083575 Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Drugs 0.000 description 5
- DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium laurylsulphate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCCCCCCCCCCOS([O-])(=O)=O DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- 210000004027 cells Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000000855 fungicidal Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000019333 sodium laurylsulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 5
- ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L Copper(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Cu+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] ARUVKPQLZAKDPS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 238000010222 PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910000366 copper(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003752 polymerase chain reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 239000006152 selective media Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- UOZODPSAJZTQNH-LSWIJEOBSA-N Zygomycin A1 Chemical compound N[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)C[C@@H](N)[C@@H]2O)O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)N)O[C@@H]1CO UOZODPSAJZTQNH-LSWIJEOBSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229960001914 paromomycin Drugs 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- BRZYSWJRSDMWLG-DJWUNRQOSA-N (2R,3R,4R,5R)-2-[(1S,2S,3R,4S,6R)-4,6-diamino-3-[(2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3-amino-4,5-dihydroxy-6-[(1R)-1-hydroxyethyl]oxan-2-yl]oxy-2-hydroxycyclohexyl]oxy-5-methyl-4-(methylamino)oxane-3,5-diol Chemical compound O1C[C@@](O)(C)[C@H](NC)[C@@H](O)[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)O2)N)[C@@H](N)C[C@H]1N BRZYSWJRSDMWLG-DJWUNRQOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RIOXQFHNBCKOKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benomyl Chemical compound C1=CC=C2N(C(=O)NCCCC)C(NC(=O)OC)=NC2=C1 RIOXQFHNBCKOKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GPRBEKHLDVQUJE-VINNURBNSA-N Cefotaxime Chemical compound N([C@@H]1C(N2C(=C(COC(C)=O)CS[C@@H]21)C(O)=O)=O)C(=O)/C(=N/OC)C1=CSC(N)=N1 GPRBEKHLDVQUJE-VINNURBNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZQEIXNIJLIKNTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Metalaxyl Chemical compound COCC(=O)N(C(C)C(=O)OC)C1=C(C)C=CC=C1C ZQEIXNIJLIKNTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L MgCl2 Chemical compound [Mg+2].[Cl-].[Cl-] TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 229920000272 Oligonucleotide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium nitrate Chemical compound [K+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N chloroform Chemical compound ClC(Cl)Cl HEDRZPFGACZZDS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N edta Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002538 fungal Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000004676 glycans Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N iso-propanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000004804 polysaccharides Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZEUUPKVZFKBXPW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-amino-2-[4,6-diamino-3-[3-amino-6-(aminomethyl)-5-hydroxyoxan-2-yl]oxy-2-hydroxycyclohexyl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,5-diol;sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O.NC1CC(O)C(CN)OC1OC1C(O)C(OC2C(C(N)C(O)C(CO)O2)O)C(N)CC1N ZEUUPKVZFKBXPW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005695 Ammonium acetate Substances 0.000 description 1
- DVARTQFDIMZBAA-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium nitrate Chemical compound [NH4+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O DVARTQFDIMZBAA-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 1
- 229940064005 Antibiotic throat preparations Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940083879 Antibiotics FOR TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDS AND ANAL FISSURES FOR TOPICAL USE Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940042052 Antibiotics for systemic use Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940042786 Antitubercular Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091003117 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000007857 Castanea sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014037 Castanea sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000701489 Cauliflower mosaic virus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229960004261 Cefotaxime Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000000349 Chromosomes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940088530 Claforan Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000001072 Colon Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N D-sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007067 DNA methylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010012601 Diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001661194 Dives Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 101710023886 GUSB Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000206672 Gelidium Species 0.000 description 1
- 229940093922 Gynecological Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 206010020649 Hyperkeratosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N Inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000367 Inositol Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960003284 Iron Drugs 0.000 description 1
- PHTQWCKDNZKARW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isoamyl alcohol Chemical compound CC(C)CCO PHTQWCKDNZKARW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010025815 Kanamycin Kinase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000000996 L-ascorbic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 240000007119 Malus pumila Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000002769 Morchella esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002779 Morchella esculenta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000715 Mucilage Polymers 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Myoinositol Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000008589 Obesity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 240000007377 Petunia x hybrida Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010582 Pisum sativum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000004713 Pisum sativum Species 0.000 description 1
- 108020005120 Plant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000005204 Prunus armeniaca Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009827 Prunus armeniaca Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000002799 Prunus avium Species 0.000 description 1
- JQXXHWHPUNPDRT-WLSIYKJHSA-N RIFAMPICIN Chemical compound O([C@](C1=O)(C)O/C=C/[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H](OC(C)=O)[C@H](C)[C@H](O)[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)\C=C\C=C(C)/C(=O)NC=2C(O)=C3C([O-])=C4C)C)OC)C4=C1C3=C(O)C=2\C=N\N1CC[NH+](C)CC1 JQXXHWHPUNPDRT-WLSIYKJHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940081190 Rifampin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940043230 Sarcosine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108010077895 Sarcosine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000002966 Serum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000005708 Sodium hypochlorite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000208292 Solanaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N Sucrose Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1)[C@@]1(CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-GDQSFJPYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010006785 Taq Polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000269849 Thunnus Species 0.000 description 1
- 229940024982 Topical Antifungal Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000007984 Tris EDTA buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 240000008529 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- 229940029983 VITAMINS Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940021016 Vitamin IV solution additives Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000006096 absorbing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010419 agar Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002647 aminoglycoside antibiotic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium acetate Chemical compound N.CC(O)=O USFZMSVCRYTOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019257 ammonium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940043376 ammonium acetate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000021016 apples Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000010323 ascorbic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004500 asepsis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000376 autoradiography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003851 biochemical process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007844 bleaching agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M buffer Substances [Na+].OC([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000022534 cell killing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019693 cherries Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108091006028 chimera Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000015165 citric acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N citric acid group Chemical group C(CC(O)(C(=O)O)CC(=O)O)(=O)O KRKNYBCHXYNGOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005549 deoxyribonucleoside Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000249 desinfective Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013325 dietary fiber Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 201000009910 diseases by infectious agent Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007824 enzymatic assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001233957 eudicotyledons Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000011536 extraction buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021022 fresh fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001744 histochemical Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940079866 intestinal antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002262 irrigation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003973 irrigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004301 light adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003050 macronutrient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021073 macronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001629 magnesium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006011 modification reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007479 molecular analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001002 morphogenetic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000978 natural dye Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000017074 necrotic cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010058731 nopaline synthase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002417 nutraceutical Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000020824 obesity Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940005935 ophthalmologic Antibiotics Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenol Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003976 plant breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006308 pollination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010333 potassium nitrate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004323 potassium nitrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reduced Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001850 reproductive Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960001225 rifampicin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000005070 ripening Effects 0.000 description 1
- FSYKKLYZXJSNPZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N sarcosine zwitterion Chemical compound C[NH2+]CC([O-])=O FSYKKLYZXJSNPZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001953 sensory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001568 sexual Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001743 silencing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000162 sodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000008223 sterile water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000001226 triphosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011178 triphosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000002264 triphosphate group Chemical class [H]OP(=O)(O[H])OP(=O)(O[H])OP(=O)(O[H])O* 0.000 description 1
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229930003231 vitamins Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 wheat Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Abstract
The present invention describes a methods system of tissues culture in vitro for the genetic transformation interceded by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and for the regeneration of prickly pear plants (Opuntia sp.). The relevant factors used in this system are:a) the use of a modified mean containing Murashige-Skoog (MS) supplemented with benzylamino-purine, gibberellin A3, and an additional 20%of nitrogen in the mean MS;b) selection and use of areolas (apical and axillary meristems) as target tissue (also called targeted tissue) both, for the plants regeneration and for the genetic transformation, in view of, the stem nature of said targeted tissue;c) the co-culture procedure consists in the inoculation with the pGV2260(pB1121)strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens directly used in the areolas with a hypodermic syringe;and d) obtaining transgenic plants of prickly pear (Opuntia sp.) by means of the selection in means NOP1 supplemented with kanamicine?. The system permits a transformati on efficiency of 26%of the infected explants. This method is useful for the routinary vegetal transformation and regeneration that involves the introduction of exogenous genes in the prickly pear plant (Opuntia sp.), in a short period of time in comparison with the traditional methods of phyto-enhancement.
Description
DENOMINATION OR TITLE OF THE INVENTION
Method for the Genetic Transformation and Regeneration of Nopal Transgenic Plants. { Opuntia sp.).
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention is part of the field of biotechnology applied to the improvement of crops of economic importance. It refers to the methods of molecular biology and genetic engineering used for the generation of transgenic plants by introducing exogenous genes to plants of economic interest, in order to improve their nutritional, functional, sensory, pre and post-harvest handling qualities, as well as with the purpose of introducing said genes so that the transgenic plant produces proteins or chemical compounds of food, pharmaceutical, industrial, and / or other interest.
More particularly, this invention relates to a method for the genetic transformation and regeneration of prickly pear plants. { Opuntia sp.).
SUMMARY The present invention describes a system of in vitro tissue culture methods for genetic transformation, mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and for the regeneration of cactus plants. { Opuntia sp.). The critical factors used in this system are: a) the use of a modified medium containing Murashige-Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with benzylaminopurine, gibberellin A3, and an additional 20% nitrogen in the MS medium; b) the selection and use of areolas (apical and axillary meristems) as objective tissue (also called white tissue) both for the regeneration of plants and for genetic transformation, in view of the totipotential nature of said white tissue; c) the co-culture procedure consisting of inoculation with the strain pGV2260 (pBI121) of Agrobacterium tumefaciens directly into the
areolas using a hypodermic syringe; and d) obtaining transgenic cactus plants. { Opuntia sp.) By selection in NOP1 medium supplemented with kanamycin. The system allows a transformation efficiency of 26% of the infected explants. This method should be useful for routine plant transformation and regeneration involving the introduction of important exogenous genes of interest in the cactus plant. { Opuntia sp.), In a much shorter time compared to traditional methods of plant breeding.
BACKGROUND / PREVIOUS ART In Mexico, most of the territory is arid and semi-arid zones that occupy almost 60% (1, 450,000 km) of the total surface; They have characteristics of low precipitation, extreme temperatures and soil with little amount of organic matter, so it is very difficult to produce basic crops. The cultivation of cactus. { Opuntia sp.) Is considered a good option to produce in these regions because it has morphological and physiological characteristics that allow it to adapt to conditions of low precipitation. Cactus production has allowed marginalized groups to obtain employment, take root in the countryside, produce food and generate income for their families. For example, cactus Opuntia genus represent about 100 species that have been used for hundreds of years by man in different forms (such as forage for animals, in the production of natural dyes such as red grana, for direct consumption in food human in the form of nopalitos (stems or young cladodes) and of the fruits called tunas, and as a source of nutraceutical compounds (Bravo, 1978, Scheinvar, 1999) .The economic and social importance of the nopal in Mexico lies, above all, in the large area occupied by ^ -Wf * nopaleras, both wild and cultivated, in the type and number of producers involved, in the type of regions where they are grown, and in the diversity of the products generated. an area of 30 million hectares and those cultivated only 45 thousand hectares, however, some of the aspects for which the crop is problematic are: low production, and the quality and high number of seeds that present the fruits that are marketed, among other factors (Castellanos et al., 1999; De León et al., 1999; Gutiérrez, 1999). It is estimated that in Mexico there are about 50-60 thousand ha of prickly pear planted for prickly pear, which makes this country the main producer worldwide. There are yields of 3-15 ton / ha of fresh fruit. The commercialization of
tuna is limited by the short production period (June-November), lack of technology for postharvest handling and rapid ripening of the fruit. In the central region of Mexico, the harvest of the prickly pear is made from June in Puebla, and ends at the beginning of October in Zacatecas, concentrating production during July and August, especially in the states of Mexico and Hidalgo. 20 It is called nopal to several species of the Opuntia genus of the Cactaceae family; This family is endemic to America. Mexico has a great genetic diversity of Opuntia, which probably places it as the center of origin of the genus; This allows for a large number of wild genotypes and with different degrees of domestication for the use of family and commercial gardens (Fernández et al., 1999a). This diversity has been found in reproductive attributes, vegetative growth habits and qualitative aspects of relevance in the tuna producing regions (Fernández et al., 1999b, Vázquez Alvarado et al., 1999). Although in Mexico you can find a large number of cactus species, Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller is one of the most widely known (Pimienta-Barrios et al., 1993). In general, the nutritional value of cactus fruits compares favorably with that of apples, apricots, cherries and oranges (Cantwell, 1991). However, also in nutritional terms, the low protein content of cactus and prickly pear is a problem for people whose diet is based mainly on this plant. The biochemical processes and molecular biology that determine the yield, disease resistance, and quality characteristics of these plants are just beginning to be understood. On the other hand, it is known that the seed is a source of proteins of nutritional value, represents 5-10% of the weight of the fruit, and that it contains between 5-16% of protein. The tuna has, from the nutritional point of view, a composition similar to that of other fruits; however, the presence of polysaccharides of the mucilage type makes a big difference in it and makes it difficult to process. Nopales have a high water content and have dietary fiber, of great interest in the contemporary diet due to their ability to prevent some diseases of the colon, obesity and diabetes (Aguilar Zamora, 1999, Cantwell, 1991, Gallardo et al., 1997; Sáenz, 1998; Silos Espino et al.,
1999). Additionally, there are several Opuntia species that are used to produce nopalitos; however, Opuntia ficus-indica (L) Miller is the most commercially cultivated species. This is a cultivar without thorns very useful for production. The harvest is carried out throughout the year although productivity is higher during the spring and it is reduced in the middle of autumn and during the winter (Pimienta Barrios, 1993).
As for its reproduction, it is reported that Opuntia sp. presents self-fertilization and cross-fertilization. In addition, it carries out clistogamy, a form of autogamy in which pollination occurs before the flower opens. The systems of crossing are the set of sexual expressions of organisms that affect the genetic composition of their offspring; they are also the link between generations and the main determinant of the structure of populations. The improvement of crops of agricultural interest by traditional systems requires long periods of time; Therefore, the development of efficient in vitro plant transformation and regeneration processes has been of great help in rapidly improving important crops in recent years. The production of morphologically normal plants that contain and express exogenous genes (also called external genes, foreign or heterologous) has been made possible by the use of different strategies, being the natural transfer of genes that Agrobacterium tumefaciens performs one of the most used (Horsch et al., 1985). This system of gene transformation was established using plants of the Solanaceae family for its easy manipulation in tissue culture; although a large group of dicotyledons can be transformed successfully (Kaneyoshi et al., 1994). Protocols have been adapted from existing meristem transformation and regeneration technology for rapid propagation (Morel, 1972; Murashige, 1974), and have been used with gene transfer mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Caplan et al., 1983 Chilton et al., 1977; Depicker et al., 1983). Recent advances in the transformation of plants have increased the possibility of making genetically planned changes and thus modify the processes, expanding the use of germplasm useful for plant improvement programs (McEIroy, 1996). This information is critical to define the future of strategies for improvement in crops that have adaptation limitations (drought, salinity, low temperature), productivity (pests, diseases), and fruit quality (Pimienta-Barrios, 1994). It is well known that the use of the transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens
can lead to stable incorporation of exogenous genes of interest to the genome of a number of plant species (Weising et al., 1988). Positive results have already been reported in several economically important crops (Ishida et al., 1996, Li et al., 1992, Miguel and Oliveira, 1999). However, for nopal there are no reports on its genetic transformation using any of the available strategies, including the Agrobacterium tumefaciens system. In the present invention, a system of methods for the genetic transformation, regeneration and in vitro propagation of cactus plant tissues is presented. { Opuntia sp.).
OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION Bearing in mind that the improvement of crops of agricultural interest, by the natural systems of crossing or traditional methods of genetic improvement, requires of long periods of time, it is an object of the present invention to provide a highly efficient system. efficient methods that allow for
genetic transformation and the regeneration of prickly pear plants. { Opuntia sp.) With better agronomic, alimentary, functional, nutritional characteristics, and / or with compositions and / or physicochemical principles of high added value, in a much shorter time than that used in the previous systems or methods. Also, given the capabilities of the cactus plant. { Opuntia sp.) To grow
abundantly in adverse agricultural and climatological conditions for other plants, it is an object of the present invention to provide a highly efficient system of methods that allow the generation of transgenic cactus plants that have the capacity to produce the plant or parts of the plant with the best agronomic, alimentary, functional, nutritional characteristics, and / or with novel physicochemical compositions and / or principles of high added value, in agricultural and climatological conditions that are limiting or oppressive for many other plants. The above objects, as well as other objects and advantages of the invention, are achieved by a system of in vitro tissue culture methods to carry out the genetic transformation, mediated by the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and for the regeneration of nopal plants. . { Opuntia sp.). The critical factors used in this system are: a) the use of a modified medium containing Murashige-Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with benzylaminopurine, gibberellin A3, and an additional 20% nitrogen in the MS medium; b) the selection and use of areolas (apical and axillary meristems) as objective tissue (also called white tissue) both for the regeneration of plants and for genetic transformation, in view of the totipotential nature of said tissue; c) the use of a co-culture procedure consisting of inoculation with strain pGV2260 (pBI121) of Agrobacterium tumefaciens directly in the areolas using a hypodermic syringe; and d) obtaining transgenic cactus plants. { Opuntia sp.) By selection in NOP1 medium supplemented with kanamycin.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Plant material Opuntia ficus-indica cv. "Villa Nueva" was obtained from germplasm resources of Villa Hidalgo, Zacatecas, Mexico. Modified stems (cladodes) were selected from 8-year-old plants with high yields of nopalitos and prickly pear (80-90 ton / ha) (Flores Valdez, 1995).
Generation of explants in aseptic culture In order to obtain explants in aseptic culture in vitro from cactus cladodes cultivated in the field, three treatments were tested. In treatment one, the surface of cladodes 7-10 cm in length was washed with commercial detergent and tap water, followed by immersion in Clorox (commercial sodium hypochlorite solution commonly used as a laundry bleach) at 10% (v / v) for 10 min and 70% ethanol (v / v) for 5 min (Escobar et al., 1986). Treatment two consisted of treatment one except that, before dives in Clorox and ethanol, the cladodes were also immersed in a solution containing a mixture of the following fungicides: Agrimycine (1 mg / L), Benlate (2 mg / L) and Ridomil (2 mg / L). Treatment three consisted of treatment two with the addition of cupric sulfate (300 mg / L) to the fungicide solution; then rinsed with 70% (v / v) ethanol for 1 min, 1.6% Clorox (v? /) for 10 min, and sterile distilled water. The cladodes were cut into fragments of a square centimeter, each fragment containing an areola. The initial experiments to determine the optimal culture conditions for the induction of shoots, from explants containing areolas, were not successful due to the high level of contamination in vitro with bacteria and endogenous fungi of cactus. To solve this problem, the effect of several fungicides including Agrimycine, Benlate, Ridomil and cupric sulfate was tested in terms of its surface disinfection capacity to obtain aseptic plant material. Cupric sulfate was the only effective treatment; resulted in total asepsis of 10% of the explants, while the other fungicides did not produce aseptic explants. This observation, on the useful effect of cupric sulfate for the inhibition of fungal growth in tissue culture, is not a surprise since said compound has been used for a long time in the treatment of fungal diseases in agriculture.
Regeneration of plants The areolas consist of an apical meristem that directs the growth and development processes of the whole plant. Therefore, these structures were chosen as objective tissue due to their high totipotentiality, which is a requirement for tissue culture and genetic transformation of plants. The explants were cultivated for induction and propagation of calluses in medium
NOP1: macronutrients and micronutrients, iron, myo-inositol and vitamins from Murashige-Skoog medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) plus ammonium nitrate (190 mg / L), potassium nitrate (160 mg / L), benzylaminopurine (BAP) 2 mg / L), gibberellin A3 (1 mg / L), citric and ascorbic acids (150 mg / L each), 2% sucrose, pH adjusted to 5.8 and solidified with agar-agar (7 g / L; Bioxon). For the establishment of aseptic cultures, the washes with the fungicide solutions mentioned above were used. The explants were cultured with a 16 h photoperiod with fluorescent Sylvania lamps of cold and white daylight (35 μmol / m2 / s) at 26 ° C. From aseptic cladodes established under tissue culture conditions, explants containing areolas were dissected and cultured in NOP1 medium for bud proliferation. The development of an average of 30 shoots per explant was observed after 45 days of incubation; the shoots were subcultured every 60 days in fresh NOP1 medium. The number and quality of outbreaks obtained with the NOP1 medium were similar to those reported by Escobar et al.
(1986), in whose work Opuntia amyclaea was used as a source of plant material. The high efficiency of our shoot proliferation protocol is due to the fact that a 7-10 cm cladode can be dissected to obtain up to 25 explants, each containing an areola that efficiently responds to shoot formation. This morphogenetic process is a prerequisite for the experiments of genetic transformation of the plant, mediated by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens system or other alternative techniques of genetic transformation. After three weeks of incubation under illumination, the differentiated outbreaks of Opuntia ficus-indica were rooted in basal MS medium containing BAP (2 mg / L). Later, complete plants were established in soil for further growth and development.
Selective media The tolerance tests were carried out using three different aminoglycoside antibiotics: kanamycin, geneticin (G418) and paromomycin at 25, 50 and 100 mg / L, respectively. 70 shoots were grown in each medium by treatment for 45 days of incubation, until the growth and development of the shoots were totally inhibited. Data were obtained at 15, 30 and 45 days.
Tolerance assays were carried out using kanamycin, geneticin (G418) or paromomycin at 25, 50 and 100 mg / L each. The most efficient selective agent was kanamycin at 100 mg / L, as it stopped growth and development in 100% of the treated explants, compared to 88.6% using G-418 and 42% with paromomycin, after 45 days of incubation. All the outbreaks affected by the antibiotics showed chlorosis in their base, after which necrosis occurred and finally the death of the entire explant. These results agree with previous reports on genetic transformation, in which kanamycin is considered the best selective agent for dicotyledonous species.
Bacterial strain Plasmid pBI121 (Jefferson, 1987) was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 Rif (pGV2260) (Deblaere et al., 1985) by electroporation. This plasmid contains the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (npt II gene) as a selection marker, under the control of a nopaline synthase promoter. { nos), as well as the ß-glucuronidase gene (uidA gene, also called GUS) as a reporter gene, controlled by the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus. Agrobacterium tumefaciens was cultured overnight at 28 ° C in liquid Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Gibco-BRL, Life Technologies, Inc., Gai le sburg, MD) supplemented with rifampicin (50 mg / L), carbenicillin (50 mg / L). mg ,.) and kanamycin (50 mg / L), until reaching an optical density of 1.1 to 600 nm.
Protocol of genetic transformation of plants and generation of transgenic plants The explants of one square centimeter were infected specifically in the areolas (Figure 1A). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells were harvested from fresh cultures of 3 days of incubation in Petri dishes. The process involves inoculation using a 29G x 13 mm needle in a sterile hypodermic syringe, injecting approximately 10 μL of
Agrobacterium tumefaciens suspended in sterile distilled water (approximately 5 x 10 ^ cells) at each injection site. The infected explants were co-cultured for 3 days in NOP1 medium and incubated under illumination with a 16 h photoperiod with Sylvania fluorescent lamps of cold and white daylight (35 μmol / m2 / s) at 26 ° C. After co-culture, the infected explants were rinsed three times with sterile water containing Cefotaxime (Claforan, 500 mg / L), and then placed in NOP1 medium supplemented with carbenicillin (500 mg / L) to inhibit the growth of Agrobacterium and kanamycin. (200 mg / L) to select the transformants. The explants were incubated under selection pressure for three months. Kanamycin resistant shoots were dissected from the original explant and transferred to fresh NOP1 medium for propagation and growth (Figure 1 B).
Explants of Opuntia ficus-indica co-cultured with Agrobacterium tumefaciens were subcultured in NOP1 medium supplemented with kanamycin (100 mg / L). All the uninfected explants died after one month of incubation in the selective medium. The tissues of Opuntia ficus-indica resistant to or kanamycin began to develop from the infected areas (areolas) in the form of small buds after five weeks of incubation. These resistant structures were dissected from the original explant for further development in selective medium with kanamycin for an additional three weeks (Figure 1 B). The efficiency of genetic transformation was 26.3% of the total of the 5 co-cultivated explants. In other words, from 216 infected explants, 57 transgenic plants were obtained. Kanamycin resistant plants were individually graded and subcultivated for further biochemical and molecular analysis. The kanamycin resistance of these plants represented the first evidence of stable genetic transformation. 0 Enzymatic assay of β-glucuronidase (GUS) GUS activity was determined in regenerated shoots resistant to kanamycin, by the histochemical assay described by Jefferson (1987). GUS expression was tested in all kanamycin resistant shoots. 5 GUS activity was observed in only 21 of the 57 plants resistant to kanamycin. The expression occurred mainly around vascular tissue and in a few cases in the areolas (Figure 1C). Wild type nopal explants (non-infected) did not express GUS activity (Figure 1 D). The absence of expression of GUS activity in the rest of the plants resistant to kanamycin can be explained in terms of silencing of the gene expression, which has been demonstrated in other species (Lambe et al., 1995). The
DNA methylation has also been associated with the gradual loss of GUS expression. To test the possibility of presence of chimeric plants due to the complex organization of the apical bud itself, explants were taken from shoots resistant to kanamycin but without GUS activity and subcultured on fresh selective medium every two weeks. All of them responded positively regarding growth and development under selection, and it was possible to obtain 15-20 shoots from each explant after two months of culture under illumination (Figure 1 E). The expression of the GUS reporter gene provided confirmatory evidence of stable genetic transformation mediated by the
Agrobacterium tumefaciens in Opuntia ficus-indica. The transgenic plants were successfully established under soil conditions as shown in Figure 1 F.
Isolation of Opuntia DNA 20 Genomic DNA was isolated from young cladodes using a modification of the protocol described by Shure et al. (1983). This modified method consists of collecting approximately 250 mg of transgenic or non-transgenic tissue in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes, and grinding in liquid nitrogen to a fine powder using a glass pistil attached to a homogenizer
(CAFRAMO, Stirrer type RZR). The powdered tissues were resuspended with
500 μL of extraction buffer (7.0 M urea, 0.35 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.02 M EDTA, 1% sarcosine) for at least 45 min. The tissue homogenate was extracted with a volume of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25: 24: 1, v / v / v). The aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation. To ensure minimum levels of protein and polysaccharides, the DNA was further purified by adding a half volume of 7.5 M ammonium acetate, pH 8.0, and then incubating at room temperature for 60 min, after which it was centrifuged at 18,000 xg for 15 min.; The aqueous phase was then precipitated using an equal volume of isopropyl alcohol. The precipitated DNA was washed once with 70% (v / v) ethanol and resuspended in TE buffer (0.01 M Tris-HCl, 0.01 M EDTA, pH 8.0).
Analysis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) PCR analysis was carried out according to Williams et al. (1990). Each sample (150 ng of each of the seven putatively transgenic Opuntia ficus-indica genomic DNAs) was incubated in a mixture containing the four 2-deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs, 0.4 mM each), 2.5 mM magnesium chloride, both suitable primer oligonucleotides (0.4 mM each), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco-BRL, Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and sterile deionized water for a total volume of 25 μL. The primer oligonucleotides used for the amplification of the nptll gene were 5'-TATTCGGCTATGACTGGGCA-3 'and 5'-GCCAACGCTATGTCCTGATA-3', with an expected amplification product of approximately 650 bp. Due to the small amount of plant tissue needed for PCR analysis, seven transformed clones were analyzed that showed the same levels of kanamycin resistance as well as GUS expression. PCR analysis yielded the expected 650 bp fragment of the inner region of the npt II gene (Figure 2, Lanes 1-7). No amplification was observed when using the DNA from non-transformed plants (Figure 2, Lane 8). This analysis represented a third line of evidence in favor of the genetic transformation carried out in cactus. { Opuntia sp.).
Transfer analysis and Southern hybridization The total plant DNAs (50 μg measured by A260 / 280) obtained from wild type and putatively transformed plants were digested overnight at 37 ° C, using 10 units of Pstl per microgram of DNA; then they were separated on 0.7% agarose gels and transferred to a Nylon membrane (Hybond N +, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, NJ, Sambrook et al., 1989). Each filter was prehybridized at 65 ° C in a buffer containing 7% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), 0.5 M sodium phosphate and 1% serum bovine albumin for 4 h, and hybridized with the probe overnight at 65 ° C. C in the same shock absorber. Two 32p labeled probes were used by random priming reactions from plasmid pBI121: a 1.5 kb Pstl-Pstl fragment from the nptll gene, or a 2.0 kb BamHI-EcoRI fragment from the GUS gene ( Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983). The filters were washed in 2x SSC (Sambrook et al., 1989) with 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 5 min; then they were washed with 1x SSC with 0.1% SDS at 65 ° C for 15 min, and a final wash of 0.5x SSC with 0.1% SDS at 65 ° C for 5 min. The filters were visualized by autoradiography using X-ray film (Cronex, Dupont).
As an additional confirmation that the nopal buds obtained (resistant to kanamycin and with GUS activity) were actually transgenic, nine GUS- and PCR-positive clones and one nontransgenic plant tissue clone were analyzed by transfer and hybridization analysis Southern type. When using a fragment of the npt II gene as a probe, all putatively transgenic propagated clones showed the expected hybridization signal of 1.5 kb, and at least four different integration patterns of the npt II gene were observed, while the non-transformed clone did not showed hybridization (Figure 3, lanes 1-9). After extensive washes, the same membrane was hybridized with a 2.0 kb fragment of the GUS gene; the expected hybridization signals were found in the corresponding transgenic plants (Figure 4, lanes 1-9). The different integration patterns were observed with both the GUS probe and the npt II gene. The observation of different integration patterns can be explained in terms of stable genetic integration in different chromosomes and / or in terms of the number of copies that were integrated into the genome of the plant. The results of the Southern blot analysis and hybridization provided the most important confirmatory evidence of the stable genetic transformation of Opuntia sp.
Conclusions In this report we describe reproducible protocols for transformation, for plant regeneration in vitro and for the propagation of nopal. { Transgenic opuntia sp.). The system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens was applied successfully for the stable genetic transformation of cactus. { Opuntia sp.). The efficiency of gene transfer from Agrobacterium cells to plant cells was high according to the relatively high number of kanamycin-resistant plants obtained, the β-glucuronidase activity, and the PCR and transfer and Southern-hybridization assays . These results clearly show that in cultured Opuntia explants, the areola can be easily and rapidly transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. These observations agree with those reported by Ulian et al. (1988), Grimsley et al. (1988), Dale et al. (1989), Hussey et al. (1989), and Seabra and Pais (1998), whose work reported that in buds of petunia, wheat, corn, pea and European chestnut in culture, the youngest tissue (the apical meristem) was the best tissue selected as a target for genetic transformation by Agrobacterium. Therefore, we conclude that it is possible to integrate genes of interest in Opuntia species. This represents the first report of stable genetic transformation of cactus. { Opuntia sp.).
References Aguilar Zamora, A.A. 1999. Generation, validation and transfer of technology of the irrigation and fertilization component to advance the flowering of the nopal in the State of Hidalgo. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 48-49. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Bravo, H.H. 1978. The Cactaceae of Mexico. Second Edition, p. 735. UNAM. Mexico. Cantwell, M. 1991. Quality postharvest physiology of nopalitos and tunas. Proceedings of the Second Annual Texas Prickly Pears Council Meetings. Texas A &M University, Kingsville, Texas. Caplan, A., Herrera-Estrella, L., and Inze, D. J. 1983. Introduction of genetic material into plant cells. Science 222: 815-821. Castellanos, C.P .; López, Ch.l.E .; De Luna, E.J.M. and Flores, V.C.A. 1999. Production and marketing costs of tuna. { Opuntia spp.) In the region of San Martín de la Pirámides. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 54-55. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Chilton, M.D., Drummond, M.H. and Merlo, D.J. 1977. Stable incorporation of plasmid
DNA into higher plant cells: The molecular basis of crown gall tumorigenesis. Cell 11: 262-271. Dale, J.P., Marks, S.M., Brown, M.M., Woolston, J.C., Gunn, V.H., Mullineaux, M.P., Lewis, M.D., Kemp, M.J., Chen, D.F., Gilmour, M.D. and Flavell, B.R. 1989. Agroinfection of wheat: Inoculation of in vitro grown seedlings and embryos. Plant Science 63: 237-245. Deblaere, R., Bytebier, B., de Greve, H., Deboeck, F., Schell, J., Van Montagu, M. and Leemans, J. 1985. Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-medlated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acids Research 13: 4777-4788. De León, R.J.M .; De Luna, E.J.M. and Flores, V.C.A. 1999. Production and marketing costs of tuna. { Opuntia spp.) In the potosino-zacatecano altiplano. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 56-57. Aguirre Rivera,
J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). 6-10 September 1999, Institute of
Research of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Depicker, A., Van Montagu, M. and Schell, J. 1983. Plant cell transformation by Agrobacterium plasmids In: Genetic Engineering. of Plants: An Agricultural
Perspective pp. 143-176. Kosuge, T., Meredith, C. and Hollaender, A. (Eds). Plenum Press, New York. Escobar, A., Villalobos, V.M. and Villegas, M. 1986. Opuntia micropropagation by axillary proliferation. Plant Cell and Organ Culture 7: 269-277.
Feinberg, A.P. and Vogelstein, B. 1983. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Analytical Biochemistry 132: 6-13. Fernández, M.R .; Luna, J .; Gutiérrez, F .; Sáenz, L.A .: Méndez, S.J .; Mondragón, C. and Zegbe, J. 1999a. Evaluation of nopal nopal germplasm in central Mexico. In: Memory of the VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 2-3. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autos isma University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Fernández, M.R .; Luna, J .; Gutiérrez, F .; Sáenz, L.A .; Méndez, S. J .; Mondragón, C. and Zegbe, J. 1999b. Study of nopal cultivars by main components. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 4-5.
Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Flores Valdez, C.A. 1995. Nopalitos, processing and marketing. In: Agroecology,
Cultivation and Uses of Cactus Pear, pp. 92-119. Barbera, G., Inglese, P., Pimienta-Barrios, E., and Arias Jiménez, E.J. (Eds.) International Technical Cooperation Network on Cactus Pear, FAO. Gallardo, Y .; Zambrano, M. L. and Hernández, A. D. 1997. Determination of the physicochemical properties of the nopal vegetable. In: Memories of the Congress
National and V International on knowledge and use of cactus. Monterrey, Mexico, pp.277-278.
Grimsley, H.N., Ramos, C, Hein, T. and Hohn, B. 1988. Meristematic tissues of maize plants are most susceptible to agroinfectión with maize streak virus.
Biotechnology 6: 185-189. Gutiérrez, A.F. 1999. Evaluation and comparison of 24 variants of white tuna. { Opuntia spp.) In Aguascalientes. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI
International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 6-7.
Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Horsch, R.B., Fry, J.E., Hoffmann, N.L., Eichholtz, D., Rogers, S.G. and Fraley, R.T.
1985. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229-1231. Hussey, G., Johnson D.R. and Warren, S. 1989. Transformation of meristematic cells in the shoot Apex of cultured pea shoots by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and
A. Rhizogenes. Protoplasm 148: 101-105. Ishida, Y., Saito H., Ohta S., Hiei Y., Komari T. and Kumashiro T. 1996. High efficiency transformation of maize. { Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotechnology 14: 745-750. Jefferson, R.A. 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 5: 387-405. Kaneyoshi, J., Kobayashi S., Nakamura Y., Shigemoto Y. and Doi Y. 1994. A simple and effiecient gene transfer system of trifoliate orange. { Poncirus trifoliata Raf). Plant Cell Reports 13: 541-545. Lambe, P., Dinant, M. and Matagne, R.F. 1995. Differential long-term expression and methylation of the hygromycin phosphotransferase (hph) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) genes in transgenic pearl millet. { Pennisetum glaucum) callus. Plant Science 108: 51-62. Li, X.Q., Liu C.N., Ritchie S.W, Peng J.Y., Gelvin, S.B. and Hodges, T.K. 1992. Factors influencing Agrobacterium mediated transient expression of gusA in 5 rice. Plant Molecular Biology 20: 1037-1048. McEIroy, D. 1996. The industrialization of plant transformation. Nature Biotechnology 14: 715-716. Miguel, M.C. and Oliveira, M.M. 1999. Transgenic almond. { Prunus dulcis Mili.) Plants obtained by AgroDacíer / um-mediated transformation of leaf explants. Plant
Cell Reports 18: 387-393. Morel, G. 1972. Morphogenesis of stem apical meristem cultivated in vitro: Application to clonal propagation. Phytomorphology 22: 265-277. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay 15 with tufa tissue cultures. Physiology Plantarum 15: 473-497. Murashige, T. 1974. Plant propagation through tissue culture. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 25: 135-166. Pimienta Barrios, E. 1993. Vegetable cactus. { Opuntia). In: Pulses and Vegetables, pp. 177-191. William, J.T. (Ed) Chapman and Hall. London 20 Pepper-Barrios, E. 1994. Prickiy pear. { Opuntia spp.): A valuable fruit crop for the semi-arid lands of Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 28: 1-11. Pimienta-Barrios, E., Barbera G. and Inglese P. 1993. Cactus pear. { Opuntia spp., Cactaceae). International network: An effort for productivity and environmental conservation for arid and semiarid lands. Cactus and 25 Succulent Journal (U.S.) 65: 225-229. Sáenz, C. 1998. Nopal and cactus pear processing altematives. Proceeding International Symposium "Cactus pear and nopalitos processing and uses". Santiago, Chile pp.33-40.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY. Scheinvar, L. 1999. Biosystematics of Mexican xoconostles and their economic potential. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 255-274. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Seabra, C.R. and Country, S.M. 1998. Genetic transformation of European chestnut. Plant Cell Reports 17: 177-182. Shure, M., Wessier, S. and Federoff, N. 1983. Molecular identification and isolation of the waxy locus in maize. Cell 35: 225-233. Silos Espino, H .; Rodríguez Salazar, E .; Rascón Cruz, Q .; Osuna Castro, J. and Paredes López, O. 1999. Reserve proteins of importance of cactus. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 36-37. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Ulian, CE., Smith, H.R., Gould, H.J. and McKnight, D. 1988. Transfomation of plants via the shoot apex. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology 24 (9): 951-954. Vázquez Alvarado, R.E .; Salinas García, G .; Gallegos Vázquez, C. and Valdéz Cepeda, R. 1999. Collection and ex situ conservation of the nopal genetic diversity in northeastern Mexico. In: Memory VIII National Congress and VI International on the Knowledge and Use of Nopal, pp. 19-20. Aguirre Rivera, J.R. and Reyes Agüero, J.A. (Eds.). September 6-10, 1999, Research Institute of Desert Areas, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí. University Editorial Potosina, San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. ISBN 968-7674-64-4. Weising, K., Schell, J. and Kahl, G. 1988. Foreign genes in plants: Transfer, structure, e. pression and applications. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 421-477. Williams, J.G., Kubelik, A.R., Livak, K.J., Rifaiski, L.A. and-Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.
Nucleic Acids Research 18: 497-504.
LEGENDS OF THE FIGURES Figure 1. Protocol of genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic cactus plants. { Opuntia sp.) Mediated by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens system. A) Infection of apical meristems (areolas) using a syringe needle with 10 μl of suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells. B) Kanamycin-resistant outbreaks after two months of incubation under selection. C) Expression of ß-glucuronidase in explants resistant to kanamycin. D) Wild type explants showing absence of β-glucuronidase expression. E) Propagation of shoots in medium containing kanamycin. F) Transgenic cactus plants established in soil under greenhouse conditions.
Figure 2. PCR analysis of seven plants resistant to kanamycin (lanes 1-7) and wild type tissue (non-infected, lane 8).
Figure 3. Southern blot analysis and hybridization using an npt II gene fragment as a probe.
Figure 4. Southern blot analysis and hybridization using a fragment of the GUS gene as a probe.
Claims (7)
- CLAIMS 1. A method to transform a cactus plant. { Opuntia sp.) Using Agrobacterium comprising the steps of: a) contacting nopal explants with Agrobacterium; b) growing in NOP1 medium containing carbenicillin at concentrations capable of inhibiting the growth of Agrobacterium, and kanamycin as an agent to select the explants expressing the selection gene; and c) regenerating the plants that express the transgene.
- 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the culture of the in vitro explants is carried out in modified medium containing Murashige-Skoog (MS) basal medium supplemented with benzylaminopurine, gibberellin A3 and 20% additional nitrogen in the MS medium.
- 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the transformed plants are regenerated in NOP1 medium supplemented with kanamycin.
- 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the Agrobacterium strain is introduced to the explant by hypodermic syringe.
- 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the explants are selected from areolas or meristematic tissues of the cactus stems or cladodes.
- 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the prickly pear plant is Opuntia sp.
- 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the prickly pear plant is Opuntia ficus- indica. The method of claim 1 wherein the Agrobacterium species is Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The method of claim 1 wherein the nopal plants are genetically transformed stably. . The method of claim 1 wherein the transgene is expressed in subsequent generations.
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
MXPA01004202A true MXPA01004202A (en) | 2002-06-05 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Oosumi et al. | High-efficiency transformation of the diploid strawberry (Fragaria vesca) for functional genomics | |
Barcelo et al. | Transgenic cereal (tritordeum) plants obtained at high efficiency by microprojectile bombardment of inflorescence tissue | |
JP5323044B2 (en) | Method for enhancing stress tolerance in plants and method | |
AU615463B2 (en) | Process for gene transfer in plants | |
Dhekney et al. | Advances in papaya biotechnology | |
Maligeppagol et al. | Genetic transformation of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) with Dreb1A transcription factor known to impart drought tolerance | |
CN104770294B (en) | A kind of protocorm based on the sprouting of iris seed is the breeding method of acceptor | |
JP7250524B2 (en) | Methods for improving genetic transformation of sorghum | |
WO2009067398A1 (en) | Transformation of crambe abyssinica | |
Sheri et al. | Genetic engineering of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for important agronomic traits | |
Sarker et al. | Genetic transformation | |
El-Siddig et al. | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato plants expressing defensin gene | |
JP3755876B2 (en) | Method for producing recombinant plant not containing selectable marker, and recombinant plant produced by the method | |
Khalil et al. | In vitro regeneration and overexpression of pea DNA helicase 45 (PDH45) gene through Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in oilseed Brassica spp. | |
RU2261275C2 (en) | Method for preparing transgenic plants with enhanced resistance against phytopathogens | |
Ozcan | Tissue culture in pea and engineering a marker gene for specific expression in target cells for plant transformation | |
MXPA01004202A (en) | Method for the genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic prickly pear plants (opuntia sp.) | |
US5840557A (en) | Method for producing seeds and plants thereof involving an in vitro step | |
Badr-Elden et al. | Transgenic date palm containing endotoxin Cry3Aa gene | |
Das et al. | Study of different factors affecting Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) | |
Elsiddig et al. | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and in vitro regeneration of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants cv. castlerock | |
Kumar | Safflower disease—a sustainable protection against Alternaria carthami L. | |
Naderi et al. | Genetic transformation of Persian melon (Cucumis melo L.) via Agrobacterium | |
Almerei | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Syrian maize with anti-stress genes | |
Dhekney | Molecular investigations, cryopreservation and genetic transformation studies in papaya (Carica papaya L.) for cold hardiness |