LU93285B1

LU93285B1 - Behavior monotoring system and method

Info

Publication number: LU93285B1
Application number: LU93285A
Authority: LU
Inventors: Renan Serra
Original assignee: Tarkett Gdl Sa
Priority date: 2016-10-31
Filing date: 2016-10-31
Publication date: 2018-05-29
Also published as: WO2018077734A1

Abstract

A behavior monitoring system for monitoring the behavior of a person in a building comprises: o walking activity sensors integrated in or concealed by permanently installed finishing work on the building, the walking activity sensors configured for producing a measurement signal indicating when the person is walking on a walk-on-able surface of a flooring that is part of the finishing work; and o an evaluation system connected to the walking activity sensors so as to receive the measurement signal for processing. The evaluation system is configured to extract gait characteristics from the measurement signal, to log at least part of the gait characteristics in a database, and to identify development trends in the logged gait characteristics indicative of evolution of the person's behavior. The evaluation system may also generate electronic reports on the person's behavior, the electronic reports including notice of any suspected evolution of the person's behavior. 93285

Description

DESCRIPTION

BEHAVIOR MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD

Field of the Invention [0001] The invention generally relates to a behavior monitoring system, especially, but not exclusively, for monitoring persons in their indoor living environment, e.g., in their apartment or in their private rooms within an assisted living facility (retirement home, nursing home or hospital), while preserving, as much as possible, the monitored persons' autonomy and privacy.

Background of the Invention [0002] EP 2 263 217 discloses an object tracking system, comprising a dense sensor field in the floor. The object tracking system detects sensor activations and links an object to each activation. It further produces event information describing events for immediate or later use. The system detects events according the conditions defined for them, on the basis of sensor observations. The conditions can relate to the essence of the objects, e.g. to the strength of the observations linked to the object, to the size and/or shape of the object, to a temporal change of essence and to movement. The system can be used e.g. for detecting the falling, the getting out of bed, the arrival in a space or the exit from it of a person by tracking an object with the dense sensor field, and for producing event information about the treatment or safety of the person for delivering to the person providing care.

[0003] US 8 138 882 discloses an electronic multi-touch floor covering that has numerous sensors arranged in a dense two-dimensional array to identify shapes. The electronic multi-touch floor covering identifies the shape of an object that is in contact with the surface of the electronic multi-touch floor covering. An entity record is then retrieved from a data store, such as a database, with the retrieved entity record corresponding to the identified shape. Actions are then retrieved from a second data store with the actions corresponding to the retrieved entity record. The retrieved actions are then executed by the computer system. For instance, if the system detects that the family dog has entered an area that is “off-limits” for it, a notification to the owner can be dispatched in order to have the dog removed from the off-limits location.

[0004] WO 2016/083294 A1 discloses a monitoring system comprising a floor covering with a sheet-type pressure sensor and a sensor control unit. The latter includes an ADC for providing a digital raw signal, a microcontroller configured to carry out data extraction by signal processing of the digital raw signal and generating a digital processed signal having a lower digital bandwidth than the digital raw signal, and a communications module connected to or integrated within the microcontroller so as to receive the digital processed signal. The communications module is configured to establish data communication with one or more database servers and to transmit the extracted data to the one or more database servers. The monitoring system of WO 2016/083294 A1 is configured to detect events such as falls, walking activity starts, walking activity ends, entries into the monitored room and exits from the monitored room. The detected events are used by the system to detect emergency situations, such as, e.g., unauthorized leaves, unauthorized intrusions, falls, sudden health degradations, etc., based on a short-time analysis of the extracted data. Creeping health degradations may also be detected long-time analysis of the extracted data.

[0005] It has been found, on the one hand, that the event-based detection of health degradations as described in WO 2016/083294 A1 works well in case of emergency situations such as falls. On the other hand, it was noted that an approach to the detection of creeping health degradations more refined than that of WO 2016/083294 A1 would be desirable.

Summary of the Invention [0006] A first aspect of the invention relates to a behavior monitoring system for monitoring the behavior of a person in a building. The system comprises: o walking activity sensors integrated in or concealed by permanently installed finishing work on the building, the walking activity sensors configured for producing a measurement signal indicating when the person is walking on a walk-on-able surface of a flooring that is part of the finishing work; and o an evaluation system connected to the walking activity sensors so as to receive the measurement signal for processing.

The evaluation system is configured to extract gait characteristics from the measurement signal, to log at least part of the gait characteristics in a database, to identify development trends in the logged gait characteristics indicative of evolution of the person’s behavior. Preferably, the evaluation system is further configured to generate electronic reports on the person’s behavior. The electronic reports may, in particular,include notice of any behavior evolution suspected indicative of degradation of the person’s well-being. In the present document, “well-being” is intended to have the same meaning as “health”.

[0007] As used herein, the term “finishing work” may include, further to flooring, skirting, plaster, corner moulding and/or ceiling.

[0008] The evaluation system takes the role of a gait analyzer with data logging functionality. As used herein, the term “gait characteristics” designates parameters describing the gait of the person(s) being monitored. Gait characteristics may include, for instance: frequency of steps, stride length, walking speed (centre of gravity speed), ground reaction force for each of the person’s feet, weight balance (centre of gravity position) and foot strike pattern variability. According to an embodiment, the evaluation system extracts and logs at least two of the above-mentioned parameters.

[0009] Gait analysis enables a significantly more precise detection of health degradations, especially those caused by dementia and Parkinson’s disease. As regards Parkinson’s disease, it is known that abnormal gait, typically characterized by small shuffling steps, may be a symptom of that disease (“Parkinsonian gait”). However, the severity of the symptom depends on the subject and may vary over the day, which may make it difficult for the physician to recognize the symptom and make the correct diagnosis. As will be appreciated, the behavior monitoring system according to the first aspect of the invention gives unprecedented access to a vast collection of gait-related data, which may facilitate diagnosis and make it more reliable.

[0010] According to an embodiment of the behavior monitoring system, the evaluation system is configured to extract the gait characteristics from the measurement signal in real-time or near real-time by carrying out signal conditioning and on-the-fly feature calculation. As used herein, “signal conditioning” includes analog-to-digital conversion (unless the walking activity sensors deliver themselves a digital signal) and noise suppression (filtering). Feature calculation takes the digitized measurement signal and builds derived values (features) intended to summarize the relevant content of the signal. In the present case, the calculated features include the gait characteristics.

[0011] Preferably, the evaluation system is configured to digitally link any suspected evolution of the person’s behavior to those among the logged gait characteristics responsible for the development trend identified as indicative of the suspected evolution. Such digital linking may include, for instance, tagging a recorded suspected evolution and/or the responsible values of the gait characteristics with metadata or attributes. The purpose of the digital linking is of course that the data being the cause of a suspected evolution can be identified, retrieved and verified more easily. Preferably, the evaluation system is configured to render the data deemed to be responsible for a suspected evolution accessible for inspection by the user (e.g. a physician). To achieve this, the evaluation system may e.g. provide a user interface capable of querying the database containing the logged gait characteristics based upon the metadata or attributes. For instance, the metadata or attributes could comprise a search string or the parameters of a search string that allows the database management system to retrieve the desired data.

[0012] According to an embodiment, at (east part of the walking activity sensors are integrated in or arranged under the flooring. Additionally or alternatively, at least part of the walking activity sensors may be integrated in or arranged behind a skirting.

[0013] The walking activity sensors could be based upon sensors selected from the group consisting of impact sensors, pressure sensors, vibration sensors, capacitive sensors, piezoelectric sensors, piezoelectret sensors, piezoresistive sensors, infrared sensors, opto-electronic sensors. Other sensing principles are not, however, excluded.

[0014] According to an embodiment, the behavior monitoring system further comprises environment sensors for sensing environmental conditions in the rooms in which the walking activity sensors are arranged. The environment sensors are in this case connected to the evaluation system and the evaluation system is configured to contextualize the logged gait characteristics using the environmental conditions sensed by the environment sensors. As will be appreciated, contextualization of the gait characteristics allows detection as well as mitigation of environmental influences. In the context of this document, “contextualization” means to associate the gait characteristics with the environmental conditions prevailing at the time the gait characteristics were detected. How the association is implemented in practice depends on the structure chosen for the database. Timestamp and location information may e.g. be suitable for establishing that relationship, i.e. environmental data and gait characteristics recorded at (approximately) the same time and (approximately) the same location are known to belong together.

[0015] Preferably, the evaluation system is configured to identify the development trends in the logged gait characteristics indicative of evolution of the person’s behavior using the contextualized logged gait characteristics. For instance, the use of contextualized gait characteristics could allow filtering out data recorded in exceptional environmental conditions (e.g. abnormally high temperatures in summer), reducing seasonal effects or taking specific events into account (e.g. clock change in autumn or spring).

[0016] According to an embodiment, the environment sensors comprise one or more of the following: luminosity sensors, humidity sensors, temperature sensors, gas sensors (e.g. CO2-sensors), fire detectors (or smoke sensors), door sensors (e.g. dry contact sensors) and presence sensors (e.g. infrared presence sensors). Preferably, the environment sensors are also integrated in or concealed by the finishing work of the building. Any suitable sensing technology may be used for each of these sensors.

[0017] The building may be any kind of residential building, e.g. a single-family house, an apartment building, a retirement home, a nursing home or a hospital. The present invention may be especially useful for monitoring, in the least disturbing manner, the inhabitants of a retirement home or a nursing home while respecting their privacy as much as possible. In that sense, the behavior monitoring system may be qualified as minimally intrusive.

[0018] According to an embodiment, the evaluation system is further configured for detecting anomalies in the extracted gait characteristics indicative of emergencies (e.g. a fall of the monitored person, or a suffering, etc.) and raising an alarm in case of such detection.

[0019] The evaluation system may comprise a computer or a network of computers, in particular, one or more database servers for logging the collected data. The evaluation system may also comprise client computers for visualization of the gait characteristics and the reports issued by the system.

[0020] If the walking activity sensors output analog signals, the evaluation system also comprises one or more analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). The ADCs are preferably configured to sample the analog measurement signals at a sampling rate (fs) comprised in the range from 50 Hz to 1 kHz, more preferably in the range from 50 Hz to 500 Hz and yet more preferably in the range from 100 Hz to 200 Hz. The resolution of the ADC is preferably at least 8 bits (28 = 256 quantization levels), more preferably at least 16 bits (216 quantization levels) and yet more preferably at least 32 bits (232 quantization levels) or even higher (e.g. 64 bits).

[0021] The evaluation system preferably comprises a buffer memory for buffering the digital measurement signal as received from the walking activity sensors. The buffer memory preferably implements a FIFO (first in first out) buffer, e.g. a cyclic buffer. When the capacity of the FIFO buffer is reached (i.e. when the buffer is full), insertion of a new sample of the digital measurement signal into the FIFO buffer is accompanied with deletion of the oldest sample of the digital measurement signal from the FIFO buffer. The content of the FIFO buffer thus changes at the sampling rate (i.e. the frequency at which new samples of the measurement signal are provided). Preferably, the evaluation system comprises a signal processor configured to extract the gait characteristics from the entire content of the FIFO buffer, e.g. using a classifier or other suitable feature extraction method. The signal processor preferably carries out these steps at the sampling rate (fs = 1/TS), i.e. each time the FIFO buffer is updated, new values of the gait characteristics are calculated. Alternatively, the signal processor may carry out these steps at a lesser rate. With N being the size of the FIFO buffer (i.e. the maximum number of samples it may contain) and fproc the extraction rate of the gait characteristics, one has the relationship: fproc = fs/n, with n = 1, 2, 3, ..., N.

The signal processor recalculates the gait characteristics each time n new samples have entered the FIFO buffer. Between each calculation, N-n samples in the FIFO buffer remain unchanged, which means that the calculations are performed on a “sliding window”. With n = N, the contents of two subsequent windows are disjoint, but n may also be chosen such that there is a non-zero overlap between the contents of two subsequent windows, i.e. n < N.

[0022] A further aspect of the invention relates to a method for monitoring the behavior of a person in a building, comprising: o producing a measurement signal using activity sensors integrated in or concealed by permanently installed finishing work on the building, the measurement signal indicating when the person is walking on a walk-on-able surface of a permanent flooring that is part of the finishing work; o conveying the measurement signal to an evaluation system for processing; o processing the measurement signal using the evaluation system, the processing including: o extracting gait characteristics from the measurement signal; o logging at least part of the gait characteristics in a database; and o identifying patterns in the logged gait characteristics indicative of evolution of the behavior of the person.

[0023] The method for monitoring the behavior may further include generating electronic reports on the person’s behavior, the electronic reports including notice of any suspected evolution of the person’s behavior, e.g. behavior changes attributed to health degradations.

[0024] Preferably, the gait characteristics are extracted from the measurement signal in real-time or near real-time by signal conditioning and on-the-fly feature calculation.

[0025] Preferably also, any suspected evolution of the person’s behavior is digitally linked to those among the logged gait characteristics responsible for the development trend identified as indicative of the suspected evolution.

[0026] According to an embodiment, the method further comprises; o sensing environmental conditions in the rooms in which the walking activity sensors are arranged o contextualizing the logged gait characteristics using the sensed environmental conditions.

[0027] Preferably, identification of the development trends in the logged gait characteristics indicative of evolution of the person’s behavior is achieved on the basis of the contextualized logged gait characteristics.

[0028] A noteworthy advantage of the present invention resides in the fact that the monitored person or the person in the monitored room is not required to wear a wearable device (for measuring pulse, respiratory rate and/or other parameters). This greatly reduces the perceived impact on the monitored person’s life and thus contributes to the minimally intrusive character of the system. According to preferred embodiments of the invention, the monitoring system thus does not comprise any such wearable device. It should be noted however, that it is not excluded to use the present monitoring system in combination with one or more other monitoring systems in case a closer and/or more advanced (medical) monitoring of the person is intended or necessary. More specifically, the present monitoring system does not aim at replacing medical vital signs monitoring systems but at offering a monitoring solution especially (but not exclusively) for situations where permanent medical monitoring of vital signs is not necessary but monitoring the person’s activity is desirable. It will be appreciated that the system according to the invention bridges that gap in a relatively non-intrusive manner with regard to the monitored person’s private life.

[0029] In contrast to systems that rely on worn devices, and which thus require a minimum amount of the monitored person’s ability and willingness to collaborate, the monitoring system according to the invention requires no specific education of the persons to be monitored. It happens quite often that patients refuse to wear a monitoring device. The reasons for refusal may be discomfort or fear from being stigmatised as a person having to be monitored. Experience shows that it may be even more difficult to encourage a person to carry a wearable device when the person feels healthy. In that respect, the present invention thus greatly simplifies the caregivers’ task.

Brief Description of the Drawings [0030] By way of example, preferred, non-limiting embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 : is a schematic view of the functional blocks of a behavior monitoring system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;

Fig. 2: is a schematic view of a walking activity sensor arranged under permanently installed decorative flooring; and

Fig. 3: is a schematic drawing illustrating a possible way of connecting walking activity sensors and environmental sensors to an evaluation system.

Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments [0031] Fig. 1 schematically shows a behavior monitoring system 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. Behavior monitoring system 10 comprises three main sub-parts, i.e., the sensing equipment 12, including the sensor hardware such as activity sensors 14 and environment sensors 16, an evaluation system 18 with several functional modules and a user interface 20.

[0032] The evaluation system 18 receives the measurement signal from the activity sensors 14 for processing. If the activity sensors 14 deliver an analog measurement signal to the evaluation system, initial signal processing 22 includes analog-to-digital conversion: otherwise, analog-to-digital conversion is achieved internally in the activity sensors and the measurement signal is received by the evaluation system as a digital signal. Signal processing 22 may include filtering and smoothing operations. The digital samples are then stored at least temporarily in a memory that functions as a FIFO buffer with a size of N samples (see also Fig. 3).

[0033] Gait characteristics extraction module 24 uses the FIFO buffer to produce a so-called feature vector, whose vector components correspond to the various gait characteristics that are analyzed. Gait characteristics are computed anew each time a specified number n of samples have been admitted to the buffer and the oldest n samples have been removed from it, thus using the N most recent samples (η « N).

[0034] For the purpose of illustration, fs may e.g. be selected in the range from 100 to 1000 Hz and N in the range from 100 to 10000. Preferably N and fs are chosen such that N/fs (i.e. the time interval represented by the FIFO buffer) is comprised in the range from 5 to 40 s, more preferably in the range from 5 to 20 s. n may e.g. be chosen such that n/fs amounts to about 0.5 s. Each one of the features (gait characteristics) quantifies a specific gait-related property of the N most recent samples and is obtained at runtime through application of a corresponding formula.

[0035] The gait characteristics are logged in a database 26. The same happens with the data collected by the environment sensors 16, which serve to contextualize the gait characteristics. A statistical analysis module 26 evaluates the development trends in the different gait characteristics. The statistics are computed not only on the basis of the live data but also taking the logged data in the database 26 into account: development trends are preferably obtained by the analysis of data in a time window having a duration of more than 5 minutes, e.g. a few hours or one day (24 hours). Long-term development trends may e.g. be observed over periods of several days, weeks, months or even years of data if such long-time observations are available.

[0036] It should be noted that gait characteristics extraction may be part of a feature extraction step that provides other features not directly related to gait. For instance, the feature extraction step could produce supplementary features indicative of a fall of the monitored person or features indicative of vital signs (e.g. heart rate, respiration rate, etc.) [0037] A module termed “anomalies detection module” 30 scrutinizes the statistics of the features, including the contextualized gait characteristics, but not necessarily only them, for any anomalies. Anomalies may include, for instance, unexpectedly high or low values of a feature, untypically high or low variability of a feature, significant variation of a long-term moving average of a feature, etc. In specific embodiments of the behavior monitoring system, anomalies, may include, e.g.: unusual levels of night activities, more frequent than usual visits to the bathroom and/or the toilet, untypically long stays in the bathroom or restroom, less frequent than usual visits to the kitchen (potential nutrition issue), less frequent than usual visits to the bathroom (potential hygienic issue possibly linked with a loss of autonomy), no or less than usual activity in specific rooms at given times of the day, etc.

[0038] Any anomalies are analyzed in a module 32 in charge of risk assessment and alert management. Module 32 assesses whether the anomalies detected indicate any risk for the health of the person who is being monitored. For instance, if a feature indicative of a fall is unexpectedly high, the module 32 cross-checks with other features and/or data in order to determine whether a fall is likely to have occurred or not. In case the module 32 suspects a fall to have occurred, it triggers an alert, which is dispatched to the user interface with high priority and importance. The alerting interface 33 may comprise, for instance, a caretaking facility’s nurse or caregiver call system.

[0039] If the module 32 determines that the gait characteristics have changed significantly over a longer time period (e.g. over several days, weeks or months), an alert of a different type is generated as the anomaly does not require immediate attention of a medical practitioner but should nevertheless be considered as soon as possible. Specifically, in the described embodiment, an anomaly, such as a suspected evolution of the monitored person’s behavior, is forwarded to an activity reporting unit 34, in charge of conditioning the statistical data for display by a user. The anomaly relating to the gait characteristics is included into the electronic reports generated by the activity reporting unit 34, e.g. in the form of a record in a warnings window or a popup window, which appears when the monitored person’s electronic file is opened in the monitoring interface 36. The activity reporting unit 34 also links the suspected evolution of the person’s behavior to those among the logged gait characteristics responsible for the development trend identified as indicative of the suspected evolution. The behavior evolution could be due to a degradation of the monitored person’s well-being (health). Depending on how the linking is achieved, the user (medical practitioner) could e.g. click on a button or hyperlink associated with the anomaly notice for direct visualization of graphics illustrating the history of the gait characteristics and the nature of the anomaly detected. Preferably, the monitoring interface is configured in such a way that the medical can validate, rate, comment and/or complement any suspected evolution notified to them. Also preferably, the evaluation system may be integrated into a patient file management system, wherein all data relevant to the monitored person are stored (dietary information, medication information, results of medical analyses or examinations, etc.) In that way, the evaluation system could take medical data into account for contextualization of the gait characteristics. This could allow gaining objective data on whether a medical treatment is effective and to the benefit of the monitored person. For instance, it would be easier for a medical practitioner to determine whether a newly prescribed medicament against insomnia reduces nighttime activities without having to rely solely on the patient’s declarations.

[0040] The database 26 stores not only the gait characteristics and the data of the environment sensors but also the anomalies, the statistical data and any feedback from the medical practitioners. The content of the database may be used to feed a relearning algorithm 38. Relearning algorithm 38 may implement, for instance, an ensemble learning technique. Relearning algorithm 38 may influence the way the gait characteristics are extracted, the statistics are computed, the anomalies are detected and the risk assessment is carried out by tuning the operating parameters of the corresponding functional blocks.

[0041] Fig.2 illustrates how walking activity sensors can be integrated in a floor covering. In the illustrated embodiment, the walking activity sensors are sheet-type pressure sensors 40 arranged under a resilient polymer-based floor covering 42. The construction of the floor covering is best illustrated in Fig. 2. The sheet-type pressure sensor 40 is affixed to the floor pavement 44 with a first adhesive layer 46. The resilient floor covering 42 is affixed on the top surface of the sheet-type pressure sensor 40 with a second adhesive layer 48. Also shown in Fig. 2 is a skirting 50, which may comprise additional walking activity sensors (e.g. vibration sensors or infrared light sensors with a field of view limited to a height range from floor level to a few (e.g. up to 20) centimeters above the floor). The skirting may serve to accommodate further sensors, such as environment sensors (e.g. CO2 sensors, temperature sensors, humidity sensors, etc.) [0042] Fig. 3 schematically illustrates how walking activity sensors 14 and environment sensors 16 can be connected to the evaluation system 18. Only a few components of the evaluation system are shown. In the illustrated embodiment, the walking activity sensors are sheet-type pressure sensors 40 using ferrorelectret polymer films for generating an analog measurement signal but other sensors may be used alternatively or in addition. The analog measurement signal is filtered and, if necessary, amplified in an analog signal conditioning stage before conversion by analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) 54. The digital measurement signals are fed to the evaluation system 18, which stores the raw data in a raw data memory 56. This repository of raw data may be organized as a simple file system.

[0043] The digital measurement signals are also fed into different buffers 58 and then processed by a microprocessor 60, which extracts the gait characteristics and, possibly, other features, from the measurement signals. The microprocessor 60 further comprises or is connected to a communication module 62 for connection to one or more networks (e.g. Ethernet, WiFi™ (IEEE 802.11™ standard), DECT (Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications) and/or a building automation system interface, etc.) The communication module 62 may, in particular, be in charge of communicating with one or more user interfaces and/or the database wherein the extracted gait characteristics are stored.

[0044] Environment sensors 16 are connected to the evaluation system in such a way that the microprocessor 60 may use the data on the environmental conditions for contextualization of the gait characteristics. With regard to the embodiment of Fig. 3, it is assumed that the environment sensors 16 provide a digital output, which can be treated as such by the microprocessor 60. However, this is not a limitation of the system, as a suitable ADC may be used in case the environment sensors should produce an analog output.

[0045] While specific embodiments have been described herein in detail, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention, which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.

Claims

1. A behavior monitoring system for monitoring the behavior of a person in a building, including step sensors integrated into or concealed by a permanent finishing work of the building, the step sensors being configured to produce a measurement signal indicating when the person is walking on a walking surface of a floor covering that is part of the finishing work; and an evaluation system connected to the step sensors to receive a measurement signal for processing, the evaluation system being configured to extract gait characteristics of the measurement signal, to record at least a portion of the characteristics of the approach in a database, to identify evolution trends in the recorded process characteristics indicative of the evolution of the behavior of the person.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the evaluation system is further configured to generate electronic reports of the behavior of the person, said electronic reports including a notification of a any alleged evolution of the person's behavior.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in claims 1 or 2, wherein the evaluation system is configured to extract the gait characteristics of the measurement signal in real time or near real time by performing signal conditioning. and a calculation of features on the fly.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the evaluation system is configured to digitally link any alleged evolution of the behavior of the person to the documented process characteristics responsible for the evolution trend identified as indicative of the assumed evolution.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the finishing work further includes skirting boards, plaster, corner moldings and / or a ceiling.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein at least a portion of the step sensors are integrated in or arranged under said floor covering.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein at least a portion of the step sensors are integrated in or arranged behind skirting boards.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said step sensors are based on sensors selected from the group consisting of: impact sensors, pressure sensors , vibration sensors, capacitive sensors, piezoelectric sensors, piezoelectric sensors, piezoresistive sensors, infrared sensors, optoelectronic sensors.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the gait characteristics comprise at least two of the following: pitch frequency, step length, walking speed , the reaction force of the soil for each of the feet of the person, the distribution of the mass, the variability of the profile of the steps.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, further comprising environmental sensors for sensing the environmental conditions in the rooms in which the step sensors are arranged, wherein the environmental sensors. are connected to the evaluation system and in which the evaluation system is configured to contextualize the recorded process characteristics using the environmental conditions sensed by the environmental sensors.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the evaluation system is configured to identify the evolution trends in the recorded gait characteristics indicative of the behavioral change of the person using documented and contextualised approach characteristics.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in claims 10 or 11, wherein the environmental sensors comprise one or more of the following; brightness sensors, humidity sensors, temperature sensors, gas sensors, fire sensors, door sensors and presence sensors.

13. The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the building is a single-family house, an apartment building, a nursing home, a care home or a hospital.

14. The behavior monitoring system as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the evolution of the behavior of the person is due to the deterioration of the well-being of the person, for example due to a dementia and / or Parkinson's disease.

The behavior monitoring system as claimed in claim 14, wherein the evaluation system is further configured to detect abnormalities in the extracted gait characteristics indicative of emergencies and to raise an alarm in the case of such detection.

16. A method for monitoring the behavior of a person in a building, comprising: producing a measurement signal using activity sensors embedded in or concealed by a permanent finishing work of the building, the measurement signal indicating when the person walks on a walking surface of a permanent floor covering that is part of the finishing work; transmitting the measurement signal to an evaluation system for processing; processing the measurement signal using the evaluation system, the processing including: extracting the gait characteristics of the measurement signal; recording at least a portion of the gait characteristics in a database; and the identification of patterns in the recorded process characteristics indicative of changes in the behavior of the person.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16, including the generation of electronic reports on the behavior of the person, the electronic reports including the notification of any presumed evolution of the behavior of the person, for example any presumed indicative evolution. degradation of the well-being of the person.

The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the gait characteristics are extracted from the measurement signal in real time or near real time by performing signal conditioning and on-the-fly characteristics calculation.

19. The method as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 18, wherein any assumed evolution of the behavior of the person is digitally related to the recorded process characteristics responsible for the trend of evolution identified as indicative of the presumed evolution.

The method as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 19, wherein said gait characteristics comprise at least two of the following: pitch frequency, step length, walking speed (center speed) gravity), the reaction force of the ground for each of the person's feet, the distribution of the mass (position of the center of gravity).

The method as claimed in any one of claims 16 to 20, further comprising: detecting environmental conditions in the rooms in which the walking sensors are arranged contextualizing the recorded gait characteristics using the environmental conditions. detected.

22. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the identification of the evolution trends in the recorded procedure characteristics indicative of the evolution of the behavior of the person is carried out based on the recorded and contextualized approach characteristics.