KR20210098234A - Fire Risk Assessment Indicator System and Method in Traditional Market - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides a traditional market fire risk assessment index system and method that can effectively prevent fire by identifying problems on fire occurrence and spread, and management in detail by performing assessment with an assessment index, and deriving a more specific response method and management plan to effectively prevent fire, in a system that generates an assessment index for preventing fire to perform assessment by self-assessing fire risk of each facility in a traditional market where stores having difficulties to manage fire facilities since each store is operated autonomously by an individual merchant are densely clustered. The traditional market fire risk assessment index system includes: an assessment index server in which a conversion score calculated for each three-tier item is input to an assessment index and the assessment index is generated; an input unit which transmits an input value input into the assessment index to the assessment index server; and a processing unit which calculates an evaluation score of the assessment index through the input value received from the assessment index server, and outputs the calculated evaluation score to an external device.

Description

Fire Risk Assessment Indicator System and Method in Traditional Market

The present invention relates to a system and method for generating a fire risk evaluation index and performing an evaluation. In a traditional market where stores are densely clustered, where it is difficult to manage fire facilities because each store is operated autonomously by individual merchants, the deterioration of facilities For fires that can occur due to problems such as non-recognition of problems in fire occurrence factors, indiscriminate installation of facilities, etc., users can evaluate the facilities themselves to recognize the problems of the facilities, and provide indicators to compensate for the problems; and it's about how

A traditional market refers to a market with a traditional structure in which small merchants gather to sell various goods directly, and the owner of each store conducts individual commercial activities. consists of a form that is

These traditional markets are densely formed with stores loaded with a large amount of products, and in the densely populated areas, it is difficult to install combustion and expansion blocking facilities or firefighting facilities, which makes it difficult to prepare countermeasures. Fires can occur due to factors such as use and the use of heaters in winter, and many shops, such as aging facilities, are in the form of old wooden buildings with tangled wires, so they have a structure vulnerable to fire. There is a problem that it is highly likely to lead to a large fire. In addition, not only are street vendors located in a disorderly manner within the traditional market, but also firefighting vehicles are difficult to enter due to congestion of nearby roads due to illegally parked vehicles on the entrance road.

However, unlike department stores and large marts, where large-scale capital is invested in traditional markets, the owner of each store individually manages their own store facilities and conducts commercial activities, so awareness of problems with deterioration of facilities is weak, and market ownership is transferred to local governments. The management and operation have difficulties in the promotion of modernization of facilities and management due to the dualization of ownership and management, which is carried out by the Merchants Association, and thus there are difficulties in the replacement and management of fire facilities.

Therefore, in order to prevent and manage fires in traditional markets, it is necessary to understand the problems of fire occurrence, spread, and management in traditional markets to prevent fires. Therefore, it should be possible to prevent fires in traditional markets and to prevent the spread of large-scale fires.

The present invention has been devised to solve the above problems, and the purpose of the present invention is that the traditional market has a structure that is vulnerable to fire response because each store is operated by an individual merchant, so facility management is not smooth, and the facility itself Because it is outdated, the risk of fire is high, and because the stores are densely populated, it can spread to a large fire in a short time. This is to provide a traditional market fire risk assessment index system and method to prevent fire in detail.

The traditional market fire risk assessment index system of the present invention is classified into 1st, 2nd, and 3rd layers on the platform so that pairwise comparisons are performed for each type of fire cause, so that the importance factor for each item of each layer is calculated and , an evaluation index server in which the scores of the three tier items are standardized using the calculated importance coefficient, the converted scores calculated for each three tier items are input to the evaluation index, and the evaluation index is generated; an input unit for transmitting an input value input to the evaluation index to the evaluation index server; and a processing unit for calculating the evaluation score of the evaluation index through the input value received from the evaluation index server, and outputting the calculated evaluation score to an external device.

It is characterized by evaluating the fire risk of traditional markets.

In this case, in the first layer, the fire cause is classified as the highest concept, in the second layer, each item of the first layer is divided by characteristics, and in the third layer, detailed items for each characteristic of the second layer It is characterized in that it is composed of

At this time, the first layer is divided into gas field, electricity field and public/store facility field items, and the second layer is divided into facility characteristics, structural characteristics and environmental characteristics items for each item of the first layer, and , the 3rd layer is characterized in that it consists of detailed case items for each item of the 2nd layer.

In this case, the pairwise comparison indicates a relative degree of importance by comparing a plurality of items in a 1:1 ratio, each of the items of the first layer, the items of the second layer for each of the first layers, and each of the items It is characterized in that the pairwise comparison is performed with respect to the items of the 3 layers for each 2 layers.

In addition, it includes a plurality of grade information classified according to the evaluation score, the evaluation score is received from the processing unit, and a determination unit that selects a grade corresponding to the evaluation score and outputs it to another external device; characterized.

In addition, it characterized in that it further comprises; a record management unit that receives the evaluation score from the processing unit, and stores and manages the received evaluation score in a separate database.

In the traditional market fire risk evaluation index method of the present invention, when the classified fire cause is input to the platform of the evaluation index server, and the conversion score is calculated with the importance coefficient calculated through pairwise comparison of each classified fire cause, the above an evaluation index generating step in which a conversion score is input and the evaluation index is generated in the evaluation index server; an input step of transmitting an input value input to the evaluation index to the evaluation index server by an input unit; and an evaluation score calculation step in which the processing unit calculates the evaluation score of the evaluation index through the input value received from the evaluation index server and transmits it to an external device.

In this case, in the evaluation index generation step, the highest concept of the fire cause is classified into 1 layer, the characteristics of each 1 layer are 2 layers, and the detailed items for each characteristic of the 2 layers are classified into 3 layers. a platform input step of being input to the platform of the index server; an importance coefficient calculation step of calculating an importance coefficient for each item of each layer by performing pairwise comparison for each layer; a conversion point 140 calculation step in which the conversion score 140 is calculated for each item of the three layers by standardizing the importance coefficient; and an evaluation index writing step in which the conversion score 140 and the Likert scale corresponding to the three-tier items are described in the evaluation index to generate the evaluation index.

In addition, after the evaluation score calculation step, a determination unit including a plurality of grade information classified according to the evaluation score receives the evaluation score, and the determination unit selects a grade corresponding to the evaluation score and transmits the grade to an external device and a fire risk level notification step of transmitting information on the level of fire risk.

In addition, after the evaluation score calculation step, a records management unit that stores and manages information in a separate database receives the evaluation score, and the records management unit stores and manages the received evaluation score; characterized in that

In addition, it is characterized in that it is a computer-readable recording medium in which a program including instructions for performing each step according to the traditional market fire risk assessment index method including one or more methods is recorded.

The fire risk assessment index system and method of the traditional market of the present invention according to the above configuration can provide an index that can evaluate the facility management performed for each store by the owner on a standardized basis, so that the facilities of the entire traditional market can be objectively evaluated. It can manage and supervise fires in detail, and it is possible to derive more specific countermeasures and management plans by identifying problems with fire occurrence, spread, and management in detail, which is effective in preventing and preventing fires from spreading. It is to provide a safe traditional market through fire monitoring.

1 is a block diagram of the present invention;
2 is an operation block diagram of the evaluation index server of the present invention;
3 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention Example 1
4 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention Example 2
5 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention Example 3

Hereinafter, the technical idea of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Prior to this, the terms or words used in the present specification and claims should not be construed as being limited to conventional or dictionary meanings, and the inventor should properly understand the concept of the term in order to best describe his invention. Based on the principle that it can be defined, it should be interpreted as meaning and concept consistent with the technical idea of the present invention.

Therefore, the configuration shown in the embodiments and drawings described in the present specification is only the most preferred embodiment of the present invention and does not represent all of the technical spirit of the present invention, so at the time of the present application, various It should be understood that there may be variations.

Hereinafter, the technical idea of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Since the accompanying drawings are merely examples shown to explain the technical idea of the present invention in more detail, the technical idea of the present invention is not limited to the form of the accompanying drawings.

The present invention is a traditional market fire risk assessment system that evaluates a traditional market fire response system, identifies problems, improves problems, and prevents fires through facility management through continuous monitoring.

Referring to FIG. 1 , the traditional market fire risk assessment system is classified into the first layer 111 , the second layer 112 , and the third layer 113 on the platform 120 , and the input fire causes 110 . For each layer, pairwise comparison is performed for each layer, so that the importance coefficient 130 for each item of each layer is calculated, and the score of the three layers 113 items is calculated using the calculated importance coefficient 130. The standardized, converted score 140 calculated for each item of the three layers 113 is input to the evaluation index, and the evaluation index 150 server where the evaluation index 150 is generated, the input input to the evaluation index 150 The evaluation score of the evaluation index 150 is calculated through the input unit 200 for transmitting a value 210 to the evaluation index server 100 and the input value 210 received by the evaluation index server 100, , characterized in that the fire risk of the traditional market is evaluated using the processing unit 300 that outputs the calculated evaluation score 310 to the external device 400 .

The traditional market fire risk assessment system should generate the evaluation index 150, which is an objective standard for evaluating the fire risk, and the evaluation index server 100 is a server that generates the evaluation index 150 do it with

Referring to FIG. 2 , first, in order to generate the evaluation indicator 150 , the evaluation indicator server 100 , the fire cause 110 classified through investigation and review of the cause of the fire in the conventional traditional market. ), the first layer 111, the second layer 112, and the third layer 113 are input to the platform 120. The platform 120 may be a program that creates a frame so that each classification divided from a high-level concept to a low-level concept can be input separately. At this time, the fire causes 110 input to the platform 120 investigate and review fires in traditional markets that have occurred in the past for fire and safety-related experts, divide the fire factors into large categories, and derive the derived high-level concepts. As a result of deriving detailed factors through this, the fire cause 110 may be classified by layer. When the classified items for each layer are input, the evaluation index server 100 displays the items for each layer in a necessary form using tables, graphs, pictures, etc. through the platform 120, so that the items for each layer are displayed. It is characterized in that it can be checked.

In an embodiment of the present invention, a higher concept of fire causes derived by analyzing fires that have occurred conventionally on the platform 120 can be input into the first layer 111, which is a large category, and Characteristics for each item can be divided and entered into the second layer 112, which is a middle classification, and detailed items are derived by subject for each characteristic corresponding to each of the second layers 112, and the third layer 113 is can be entered. The first layer 111 may be an item that classifies the causes of occurrence by field by examining the current state of occurrence of fires that have occurred in the prior art, and the first layer 111 is an item in the gas field, electricity field, and public/store facility field. items can be classified. The second layer 112 may be classified by characteristics with respect to the cause of the occurrence, and the characteristics of the second layer 112 may be respectively arranged with respect to the classification of the first layer 111 , and the second layer 112 may be classified according to characteristics. ) can be classified into equipment characteristics, structural characteristics and environmental characteristics. The three layers 113 may be detailed items derived from specific examples of causes of occurrence for each characteristic according to each characteristic and field. It is characterized in that it is a specific example of any one of the characteristics of the second layer 112 for do it with Table 1 below shows a hierarchical diagram in which the fire factors are input to the platform 120 in which the fire causes of the conventional traditional market are classified by layer as an embodiment of the present invention.

Tier 1 Tier 2 3rd tier gas field equipment characteristics Appropriateness of piping installation Appropriateness of gas leak alarm installation Is the gas meter deformed and leaking? Is there a fire around the gas meter? structural characteristics Appropriateness of intermediate valve installation Is there any damage to the pipe or hose? Connection management within 3 m hose length Hose Installation T-Connection Management environmental characteristics How important is the storage management of LPG containers outdoors? The degree of importance of fire management around LPG containers Degree of importance of separation distance management from electrical facilities electric field equipment characteristics Standard wire usage and wire connection status management Damage management of wire sheathing Normal operation and damage management of earth leakage breaker Rating Table CAUTION USE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANCE structural characteristics Management of the use of octopus wiring of electric wires Proper installation of switchgear and management of installation location Management of damage to the cover of the distribution box and exposure of live parts Manage grounding and grounding outlet use environmental characteristics Unfixed wiring equipment and poor wiring management Pedestrian wire exposure management Manage outlet moisture exposure Public/store facility area equipment characteristics Installation and management of common fire extinguishers Management of major evacuation directions and dead-end alleys Management of emergency fire extinguisher box components Securing and managing day and night evacuation routes structural characteristics Emergency fire extinguishing system installation location and surrounding management Emergency report and current location display board installation management Fire alarm system installation and condition management Management of broadcasting facilities effective for fire situations and evacuation environmental characteristics Illegal parking status management Securing and managing fire-fighting vehicle access roads Management of storage conditions in the passageway

Next, in order to generate the evaluation index 150, the evaluation index server 100 performs a pairwise comparison on the layers input to the platform 120, and selects items for each layer through the pairwise comparison 1: It compares with 1 to evaluate the relative importance between comparison objects, and the importance coefficient 130 for each item is calculated using this. Pairwise comparison is appropriate for fire and safety-related experts with specialized knowledge, and the evaluation index 150 that can provide accurate information by more objectively grasping the importance of each item through pairwise comparison It is appropriate to be able to provide

In one embodiment of the present invention, the pair comparison of the first layer 111 is a gas field-electric field, gas with respect to the gas field, electricity field, and public/store facility field corresponding to the items of the first layer 111 . The field-public/store facility field, electricity field-public/store facility field are divided into 1:1 comparison to evaluate the relative importance, and based on the importance score of each evaluated pair, through the importance calculation formula, the first layer ( 111) is calculated as the importance coefficient 130 for each item. Tables 2 to 4 are attached below to describe, for example, pairwise comparison of any one or more items among the above-mentioned items for each layer. Table 2 below shows a table in which pairwise comparison of items of the first layer 111 is performed as an embodiment of the present invention, and Table 3 shows each item of the first layer 111 calculated through pairwise comparison Table 4 shows the results of the importance coefficient 130 for each item, and Table 4 shows the results of the importance coefficient 130 for each item of the third layer 113 of the gas field among the first layer 111 calculated through pairwise comparison. will be.

Item name 5 4 3 2 One 0.5 0.3333 0.25 0.2 Item name So
important important usually important So
important gas V Electric gas V public/store Electric V public/store

variable gas field electric field Public/store management field importance 0.140 0.574 0.286

equipment characteristics Appropriateness of piping installation Appropriateness of gas leak alarm installation gas meter
Deformation and leakage Is there a fire around the gas meter? importance 0.096 0.463 0.273 0.168 structural characteristics Appropriateness of intermediate valve installation Is there any damage to the pipe or hose? Connection management within 3 m hose length Hose Installation T-Connection Management importance 0.273 0.464 0.167 0.096 environmental characteristics How important is the storage management of LPG containers outdoors? The degree of importance of fire management around LPG containers Degree of importance of separation distance management from electrical facilities importance 0.286 0.570 0.144

Next, in order to generate the evaluation index 150, the evaluation index server 100 uses the importance coefficient 130 calculated through pairwise comparison to be calculated as the conversion score 140 through standardization. characterized in that In this case, the reference item is characterized in that it is standardized based on the detailed case items of the three layers 113, and the importance coefficient ( 130) and the number of Likert scales (B) used in the evaluation index 150 may allow the conversion score 140 to be calculated. (1st layer 111, 2nd layer 112, and 3rd layer 113 in the formula mean the importance coefficient 130 for each layer, and the perfect score means the total score of the evaluation index to be received through standardization. )

As an embodiment of the present invention, when the conversion score 140 calculated according to the above formula is described, the item for which the conversion score 140 is to be calculated is one of the three layers 113 'Piping installation. In the case of 'adequacy of ', the first layer (111) importance coefficient (130) of 0.14 of the item calculated through pairwise comparison, the second layer (112) importance factor (130) of 0.634, the adequacy of the pipe installation The conversion score 140 by multiplying all importance coefficients 130 corresponding to 0.096, which is the importance coefficient 130, and dividing the number of the Likert scale (B) by the number multiplied by 100, which is the perfect score to be finally standardized. ) can be calculated.

Therefore, in the evaluation index server 100, the items of the three layers 113 are input as the evaluation items of the evaluation index 150, and the conversion score 140 calculated for each item of the three layers 113. is input to the evaluation index 150 to generate the evaluation index 150 . Table 5 below is an embodiment of the present invention, and the evaluation generated by inputting detailed items of the three layers 113 and inputting the conversion score 140, A and the Likert scale B for each item The indicator 150 is shown, and the evaluation score for each item is a total score obtained by adding the conversion score (A) and the Likert scale (B) score.

Item A B total score
(A*B) conversion score 5 4 3 2 One So
Good Good usually Inadequate So
Inadequate Appropriateness of piping installation 0.170 Appropriateness of gas leak alarm installation 0.822 Is the gas meter deformed and leaking? 0.485 Is there a fire around the gas meter? 0.298 Appropriateness of intermediate valve installation 0.081 Is there any damage to the pipe or hose? 0.138 Connection management within 3 m hose length 0.050 Hose Installation T-Connection Management 0.028 How important is the storage management of LPG containers outdoors? 0.208 The degree of importance of fire management around LPG containers 0.415 Degree of importance of separation distance management from electrical facilities 0.105 Standard wire usage and wire connection status management 3.652 Damage management of wire sheathing 0.749 Normal operation and damage management of earth leakage breaker 2.153 Rating Table CAUTION USE MANAGEMENT IMPORTANCE 1.333 Management of the use of octopus wiring of electric wires 0.409 Proper installation of switchgear and management of installation location 0.233 Management of damage to the cover of the distribution box and exposure of live parts 1.119 Manage grounding and grounding outlet use 0.661 Unfixed wiring equipment and poor wiring management 0.335 Pedestrian wire exposure management 0.164 Manage outlet moisture exposure 0.672 Installation and management of common fire extinguishers 1.085 Management of major evacuation directions and dead-end alleys 0.676 Management of emergency fire extinguisher box components 1.289 Securing and managing day and night evacuation routes 0.880 Emergency fire extinguishing system installation location and surrounding management 0.099 Emergency report and current location display board installation management 0.056 Fire alarm system installation and condition management 0.270 Management of broadcasting facilities effective for fire situations and evacuation 0.159 Illegal parking status management 0.169 Securing and managing fire-fighting vehicle access roads 0.693 Management of storage conditions in the passageway 0.345 Sum

The input unit 200, characterized in that it transmits the input value 210 input to the evaluation index 150 generated by the evaluation index server 100 to the evaluation index server 100, the facility When the author, who is the subject of evaluation, such as a manager, city hall or ward office employee, store owner, etc. performs an evaluation based on the evaluation index 150, the input unit 200 receives the information input to the evaluation index 150. It may be configured to be converted into the input value 210 and transmitted to the evaluation index server 100 . It is appropriate that the author is configured to perform the evaluation using a terminal that receives the evaluation index 150 generated from the evaluation index server 100 through a communication network such as the Internet, and the terminal is a smartphone, tablet PC, or notebook computer. , desktop, etc., can be used regardless of any device that can be connected to the communication network, but is not limited thereto. The input unit 200 is connected to the evaluation index server 100 through wired and wireless communication, and wireless communication such as WLAN, Wi-Fi, Wibro, Wimax, LTE, The information of the input value 210 can be transmitted to the evaluation index 150 server using any one or more of 3G, 4G, 5G, etc. and wired communication such as Ethernet, serial communication, and optical/coaxial cable.

The processing unit 300 calculates the evaluation score 310 for the evaluation index 150 that the author has evaluated and outputs it to the external device 400, and the evaluation score 310 is the total score of the evaluation index 150, and the degree of fire risk for the facilities of the author who performed the evaluation is calculated as a score. The evaluation index server 100 that has received the input value 210 transmits the score information for each item corresponding to the input value 210 to the processing unit 300 based on the evaluation index 150, and the The processing unit 300 may be configured to calculate the score information of the evaluation index 150 for each received item, and output the calculated total score to the external device 400 as the evaluation score 310 . The processing unit 300 may be configured as a program capable of calculating the received information as the evaluation score 310, and is connected to the evaluation index server 100 and the external device 400 through wired/wireless communication, and the It consists of any one or more of the aforementioned wireless communication and wired communication, so that information of the input value 210 and the evaluation score 310 can be transmitted and received.

The external device 400 is formed as a display and output as voice and/or text, or the author uses the visual, auditory, tactile, etc. It doesn't matter if it's configured so that it can be checked.

In another embodiment, the processing unit 300 may further include a record management unit 420 capable of receiving the evaluation score 310 output. The determination unit 410 includes rating information classified into a plurality according to the degree of fire risk based on the total score of the evaluation score 310, and selects the rating information corresponding to the received evaluation score 310. It is characterized in that the output to the external device (400). The determination unit 410 is for the author to easily recognize the fire risk level according to the evaluation score 310, and information such as the current state of the facility, the degree of risk, and solutions to problems according to the rating information. It may be configured to provide to the author, including further.

In another embodiment, the processing unit 300 may further include a record management unit 420 capable of receiving the evaluation score 310 output. The record management unit 420 may store the received evaluation score 310 in a separate database, and may be configured to manage the stored records of the evaluation score 310 . The record management unit 420 can be configured to continuously store the evaluation score 310, which the author periodically evaluates, and to compare the newly input evaluation score 310 based on the previously stored record. , it can be configured to analyze the stored evaluation score 310 to obtain information about the fire risk of the facility, such as the management level of the facility, the change in the degree of risk, the degree of change of the facility for each item, and the replacement cycle.

As shown in Figure 3, in the method of using the fire risk assessment system, the fire factor is classified through the investigation and review of the cause of the fire in the traditional market that occurred in the prior art, and the platform of the evaluation index server 100 When the conversion score 140 is calculated with the importance coefficient 130 that is input in 120 and calculated through pairwise comparison of each of the classified fire causes 110, the conversion score ( 140) is input and the evaluation index 150 is generated in the evaluation index server 100. The evaluation index 150 generation step, the input value 210 input to the evaluation index 150 is inputted to the input unit 200 ) through the input step transmitted to the evaluation index server 100, the processing unit 300 through the input value 210 received in the evaluation index server 100, the evaluation score of the evaluation index 150 It is characterized in that it comprises the step of calculating the evaluation score 310, which is calculated as 310 and transmitted to the external device.

As shown in FIG. 4 , the evaluation index 150 generating step of generating the evaluation index 150 in the evaluation index server 100 may be performed in detailed steps, and first, the fire cause 110 is identified. The platform 120 input step of classifying by layer and input to the platform 120 , the importance factor 130 calculation step of calculating the importance factor 130 , the conversion score 140 calculation step of calculating the conversion score 140 and an evaluation index 150 writing step of generating the evaluation index 150 may be performed.

The step of inputting the platform 120 is to classify the classified fire factors by layer, the highest concept is classified into the first layer 111 , and the characteristics for each of the first layer 111 are classified into two layers 112 . The detailed items for each characteristic of the second layer 112 are classified into three layers 113 and are input to the platform 120 of the evaluation index server 100 . The step of calculating the importance factor 130 is characterized in that the fire and safety expert calculates the importance factor 130 for each item of each layer by performing a pairwise comparison in which the level of importance per item is compared. In the step of calculating the conversion score 140, the importance coefficient 130 for the items of the three layers 113 is standardized and calculated as the conversion score 140, and the first layer 111, It is characterized in that the calculation is performed using the overall importance coefficient 130 of the second layer 112 and the third layer 113, the total total score to be standardized, the number of Likert scales (B), and the like. In the evaluation index 150 writing step, the items of the three tiers 113, the conversion score 140 and the Likert scale (B) corresponding to the items of the three tiers 113 are described. It is characterized by completing (150).

As shown in FIG. 5 , after the evaluation score 310 calculation step, the determination unit 410 including a plurality of grade information classified according to the evaluation score 310 returns the evaluation score 310 . , and the determination unit 410 selects a grade corresponding to the evaluation score 310, and a fire risk notification step of outputting information on the degree of fire risk of the grade to the creator to the external device may be performed. . In addition, after the evaluation score 310 calculation step, the records management unit 420 that stores and manages information in a separate database receives the evaluation score 310, and the records management unit 420 stores the information in a separate database, and the records management unit 420 stores the information in a separate database. A record management step of storing and managing the evaluation score 310 may be performed.

In the traditional market fire risk assessment system and method, it is difficult to extinguish a fire because old facilities and a large number of shops operated by individual merchants are concentrated, and in case of a fire, it is a fire in a traditional market that can spread to a large fire and cause great damage. This is to evaluate safety. Through the present invention, it is possible to identify the problems of the occurrence, spread, and management of fires in traditional markets, and to prepare alternatives for how to respond to the problems, so that a large fire can be prevented by preventing a fire or extinguishing it early. In addition, the author can recognize the problem by evaluating his/her own facility safety level, and it can be configured to receive advice or provide advice on how to improve and supplement the problem, so that it is easy to manage the facility.

As described above, in the present invention, specific matters such as specific components and the like and limited embodiment drawings have been described, but these are only provided to help a more general understanding of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited to the above one embodiment. No, various modifications and variations are possible from these descriptions by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains.

Therefore, the spirit of the present invention should not be limited to the described embodiments, and not only the claims described below, but also all those with equivalent or equivalent modifications to the claims will be said to belong to the scope of the spirit of the present invention. .

100: evaluation index server
110: cause of fire 111: 1st floor
112: 2nd layer 113: 3rd layer
120: platform 130: importance factor
140: conversion index 150: evaluation index
200: input unit 210: input value
300: processing unit 310: evaluation score
400: external device 411: judgment unit
412: Records management department

Claims (11)

For fire causes classified into 1st, 2nd, and 3rd layers on the platform, pairwise comparison is performed for each layer, and the importance factor for each item of each layer is calculated,
an evaluation index server in which the scores of the three tier items are standardized using the calculated importance coefficient, the converted scores calculated for each three tier items are input to the evaluation index, and the evaluation index is generated;
an input unit for transmitting an input value input to the evaluation index to the evaluation index server; and
a processing unit for calculating the evaluation score of the evaluation index through the input value received from the evaluation index server, and outputting the calculated evaluation score to an external device;
A traditional market fire risk assessment system, characterized in that it is configured to evaluate the fire risk of the traditional market.
The method of claim 1,
The first layer, the fire cause is classified as the highest concept,
In the second layer, each item of the first layer is divided by characteristics,
The third layer is a traditional market fire risk assessment system, characterized in that it consists of detailed items for each characteristic of the second layer.
3. The method of claim 2,
The first layer is divided into gas field, electricity field and common/store facility field items,
The second layer is divided into equipment characteristics, structural characteristics and environmental characteristics items for each item of the first layer,
The 3rd layer is a traditional market fire risk assessment system, characterized in that it consists of detailed case items for each item of the 2nd layer.
3. The method of claim 2,
The pairwise comparison is to indicate the relative importance by comparing each of the plurality of items in a 1:1 ratio,
The traditional market fire risk assessment system, characterized in that the pairwise comparison is performed on the items of the first layer, the items of the second layer for each of the first layers, and the items of the third layer for each of the second layers.
The method of claim 1,
It includes a plurality of grade information classified according to the evaluation score, the evaluation score is received from the processing unit, and a determination unit that selects a grade corresponding to the evaluation score and outputs it to another external device; characterized by comprising: traditional market fire risk assessment system.
The method of claim 1,
The traditional market fire risk assessment system further comprising a; a record management unit that receives the evaluation score from the processing unit, and stores and manages the received evaluation score in a separate database.
The classified fire cause is input to the platform of the evaluation index server, and when the conversion score 140 is calculated with the importance coefficient calculated through pairwise comparison of each classified fire cause, the conversion score 140 is input to the evaluation index, and an evaluation index generating step in which the evaluation index is generated in the evaluation index server;
an input step of transmitting an input value input to the evaluation index to the evaluation index server by an input unit;
an evaluation score calculation step of calculating, by a processing unit, the evaluation score of the evaluation index through the input value received from the evaluation index server, and transmitting it to an external device;
Fire risk assessment system method comprising a.
8. The method of claim 7,
The evaluation index generation step is,
A platform input that is input to the platform of the evaluation index server for each layer in which the highest concept of the fire cause is classified into 1 layer, the characteristics of each 1 layer are 2 layers, and the detailed items for each characteristic of the 2 layers are classified into 3 layers step;
an importance coefficient calculation step of calculating an importance coefficient for each item of each layer by performing pairwise comparison for each layer;
a conversion point 140 calculation step in which the conversion score 140 is calculated for each item of the three layers by standardizing the importance coefficient;
an evaluation index writing step in which the conversion score 140 and the Likert scale corresponding to the three-tier items are described in the evaluation index to generate the evaluation index;
Fire risk assessment system method comprising a.
8. The method of claim 7,
After the evaluation score calculation step,
A determination unit including a plurality of grade information classified according to the evaluation score receives the evaluation score,
and a fire risk level notification step in which the determination unit selects a level corresponding to the evaluation score and transmits information on the level of fire risk of the level to an external device.
8. The method of claim 7,
After the evaluation score calculation step,
A records management unit that stores and manages information in a separate database receives the evaluation score,
and the record management unit storing and managing the received evaluation score.
A computer-readable recording medium in which a program including instructions for performing each step according to the method according to any one of claims 4 to 7 is recorded.

Images