KR20180119144A - Apparatus of inquiry into work evaluation based on work object and method of the same - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention provides a device for inquiring business evaluation based on a business object and a method thereof, which provide a business evaluation result of members evaluated based on a business object based on a business grade history to increase efficiency of business evaluation inquiry. The device for inquiring business evaluation based on a business object comprises: a chat room managing part managing at least one chat room which is individually related to a message thread capable of inserting the business object including business content, a business generator, a business processor and a business grade and is participated by at least one chat room participant; a business grade statement providing part providing a business grade statement based on the business grade in the business object processed with respect to each of one or more members belonging to a specific member group related to the corresponding user, when a business grade inquiry request is received from a user terminal; and a business grade history providing part providing the business grade history generated based on the business object in the business grade statement related to the specific member when the business grade inquiry request related to the specific member is received from the user terminal.

Description

[0001] APPARATUS OF INQUIRY INTO WORK EVALUATION BASED ON WORK OBJECT AND METHOD OF THE SAME [0002]

More particularly, the present invention relates to a business object-based method for improving the efficiency of business evaluation inquiry by providing a business evaluation result of a member evaluated based on a business object on the basis of a business rating history And a business evaluation inquiry apparatus and method.

The Internet instant messenger corresponds to an application for delivering a message including characters or graphics between users, and can be implemented as a chat room participated by a plurality of users. In one embodiment, an Internet messenger may include a mobile messenger performed in a mobile environment (e.g., a mobile phone) and may include, for example, a kakao chat, a line, a wichat, a facebook messenger.

As the number of users using the Internet Messenger is rapidly increasing, applications used in the mobile environment are being developed in various ways. Among them, the business evaluation management program is used by many users.

Korean Patent Registration No. 10-0797225 (Jan. 16, 2008) relates to an e-Class management system and a grading method, a lecture interface for exchanging information with a lecturer interface through a wired / wireless network and exchanging information with a management server; A wired / wireless network connecting wired or wireless interfaces between the lecturer interface, the management server, and the lecturer's interface; A learner interface for exchanging information with the lecture-player interface through the wired / wireless network and exchanging information with the management server, and information for evaluating the learner's score from the learner evaluation database, A learner information server for searching the learner information of the learner from the learner information database and providing the learner interface to the learner interface and the learner interface, Information such as a class content information server provided to the learner interface, test or assignment information from the information analysis database, and provides the lecturer interface and the learner interface And an online interaction server for searching the online interaction database for information that can be communicated in real time between the information analysis server, the lecturer and the lecturer, and providing the interface for the lecturer and the interface for the lecturer to the management server connected to the wired and wireless network E-Class management system.

Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 10-2001-0067628 (July 13, 2001) relates to a method of managing a university using a wireless Internet, including a registration step of storing new-phase input data for each user and an information database, It provides the authentication step that confirms the user to use the entrance management, the grading management, the employment management, the baccalaureate management, the entrance management to the authorized user, the grading management, the job management, An information processing step of inputting the school management information, a LOG storing step of storing the process in the information processing step, and a notification step of informing and communicating information to the students in the school.

Korean Patent No. 10-0797225 (Jan. 16, 2008) Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2001-0067628 (July 13, 2001)

An embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus and method for displaying task evaluation based on a task object, which can improve efficiency of task evaluation inquiry by providing task evaluation results of members evaluated based on task objects based on task task history I want to.

One embodiment of the present invention provides a business object-based business evaluation that can prevent unintentional disclosure of business ratings of the persons to be evaluated by selectively providing the inquiry authority on the business evaluation of the members based on the association with the chat room Apparatus, and method.

Among the embodiments, the task evaluation apparatus based on a task object is associated with a message thread capable of inserting a task object including task content, task creator, task processor, and task rating and is participated by at least one chat room participant A chat room management unit that manages at least one chat room, a chat room management unit that manages at least one chat room, a chat room management unit that manages at least one chat room based on at least one member of a specific member group associated with the user, Providing a business rating history providing service providing a rating history and providing a business rating history created based on a business object in a business rating history of the specific member when receiving a business rating inquiry request about the specific member from the user terminal And a rating history providing unit.

Wherein the task object-based task evaluation inquiry device implements the task object as an independent task message that can be directly accessed in the corresponding chat room and is distinguished from a text message or a media message, And a business object processing unit for assigning a rating.

Wherein the task object processing unit associates the task processing speed calculated based on the number of times of provision of a remind message that is associated with the task object and requests completion of the corresponding task step according to a specific repetition criterion until the task step is completed, .

The task rating history providing unit may assign the task object access right to the task object in the task score list about the specific member to generate the task task history.

The task rating history providing unit may grant the task object access right among the task object access right based on whether or not the task object in the business grade history about the specific member is in the message thread associated with the chat room participated in by the user terminal.

The task rating history providing unit may grant the task rating change request authority among the task object access authority based on the relationship between the user associated with the user terminal and the specific member.

The task rating history providing unit may include task contents related to the task object in the task task history based on the task object access authority.

The business rating history providing unit may temporarily grant the business object inquiry permission to the associated business object under the approval of the specific member when the sharing request of the business object inquiry permission granted to the business object associated with the specific member is received from the user terminal can do.

The service rating history providing unit may divide the service rating details into the business management rating based on the business creator and the business process rating based on the business processor with respect to the processed business object with respect to each of the at least one member have.

The service rating history providing unit may reflect the group business ratings calculated and processed for the entirety of the specific member group based on the service ratings of the at least one member.

The service rating history providing unit may generate a chat room associated with the at least one to-be-shared object through the chat room management unit when receiving a sharing request including at least one to-be-shared object related to the service rating history from the user terminal, The business grade score can be shared through the business grade score.

The service rating history providing unit may insert a service rating history link for electronic inquiry of the service rating information into a message thread associated with the generated chat room to share the service rating information with the at least one shareee.

Among the embodiments, a task evaluation method based on a task object is performed by a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object connected to a user terminal. Wherein the business object based business evaluation inquiry method comprises at least one chat room associated with at least one chat room participant and each associated with a message thread capable of inserting business objects including business content, When a business rating inquiry request is received from the user terminal, calculating a business rating score based on a business rating in the processed business object with respect to each of at least one member belonging to a specific member group associated with the user, And providing a business rating history based on the business objects in the business ratings of the specific member when the business rating inquiry request for the specific member is received from the user terminal, Providing step.

The disclosed technique may have the following effects. It is to be understood, however, that the scope of the disclosed technology is not to be construed as limited thereby, as it is not meant to imply that a particular embodiment should include all of the following effects or only the following effects.

An apparatus and method for displaying task evaluation based on a task object according to an embodiment of the present invention can improve efficiency of task evaluation inquiry by providing task evaluation results of members evaluated based on task objects based on task rating history .

An apparatus and method for displaying task evaluation based on a task object according to an embodiment of the present invention is a system and method for task evaluation based on a task object based on relevance to a chat room, Can be prevented.

1 is a diagram for explaining a task evaluation inquiry system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1. FIG.
Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating the functional elements of the processor in Figure 2;
4 is a flowchart illustrating a business evaluation inquiry procedure performed by the processor in FIG.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a process of providing task rating information by a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a process of providing a task rating history by a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1. FIG.

The description of the present invention is merely an example for structural or functional explanation, and the scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited by the embodiments described in the text. That is, the embodiments are to be construed as being variously embodied and having various forms, so that the scope of the present invention should be understood to include equivalents capable of realizing technical ideas. Also, the purpose or effect of the present invention should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, since it does not mean that a specific embodiment should include all or only such effect.

Meanwhile, the meaning of the terms described in the present application should be understood as follows.

The terms "first "," second ", and the like are intended to distinguish one element from another, and the scope of the right should not be limited by these terms. For example, the first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as a first component.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected to the other element, but there may be other elements in between. On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between. On the other hand, other expressions that describe the relationship between components, such as "between" and "between" or "neighboring to" and "directly adjacent to" should be interpreted as well.

It is to be understood that the singular " include " or "have" are to be construed as including the stated feature, number, step, operation, It is to be understood that the combination is intended to specify that it does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, or combinations thereof.

In each step, the identification code (e.g., a, b, c, etc.) is used for convenience of explanation, the identification code does not describe the order of each step, Unless otherwise stated, it may occur differently from the stated order. That is, each step may occur in the same order as described, may be performed substantially concurrently, or may be performed in reverse order.

The present invention can be embodied as computer-readable code on a computer-readable recording medium, and the computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of recording devices for storing data that can be read by a computer system . Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include ROM, RAM, CD-ROM, magnetic tape, floppy disk, optical data storage, and the like. In addition, the computer-readable recording medium may be distributed over network-connected computer systems so that computer readable codes can be stored and executed in a distributed manner.

All terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs, unless otherwise defined. Commonly used predefined terms should be interpreted to be consistent with the meanings in the context of the related art and can not be interpreted as having ideal or overly formal meaning unless explicitly defined in the present application.

1 is a diagram for explaining a task evaluation inquiry system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, the business evaluation inquiry system 100 includes a business object based business evaluation inquiry apparatus 110 and a user terminal 120, which can be connected through a network.

The task evaluation apparatus 110 based on a task object corresponds to a computing apparatus that is connected to the user terminal 120 and can perform a task evaluation inquiry process. The task evaluation apparatus 110 based on a business object can manage at least one group of members included as a member of a user associated with the user terminal 120. [ The business object based business performance evaluation apparatus 110 can manage a message thread grouping messages transmitted from a group of members configured through at least one user terminal 120. In one embodiment, It can be implemented as a messenger's chat room.

The user terminal 120 corresponds to a computing device connected to the task evaluation server 110 based on a business object, and may be implemented as a desktop, a notebook, a tablet PC, or a smart phone, for example. In one embodiment, the first user terminal 120a may correspond to a mobile terminal and may be connected to the task evaluation based on the task object based on the cellular phone communication or the Wi-Fi communication. In another embodiment, the second user terminal 120b may correspond to a desktop and may be connected to the business object based business evaluation inquiry apparatus 110 via the Internet.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1. FIG.

Referring to FIG. 2, the business object based business evaluation inquiry apparatus 110 includes a processor 210, a memory 220, a storage 230, a display 240, a user interface input / output 250, and a network input / ).

The processor 210 may include a task evaluation query executor 212, a memory manager 214, and a memory synchronization scheduler 216. The business evaluation query launcher 212 may execute the business evaluation query procedure shown in Figure 4 and the memory manager 214 may include a memory area in the memory 220 that is read or created by the business evaluation query executor 212. [ And the memory synchronization scheduler 216 may schedule the synchronization time between the memory areas 221 to 225 and the non-volatile memory in the task object based task evaluation inquiry unit 110 . The processor 210 may control the overall operation of the business object based task evaluation device 110 and may include a memory 220, a storage 230, a display 240, a user interface input / output 250, (260). ≪ / RTI > The processor 210 may be implemented as a central processing unit (CPU) of the task evaluation unit 110 based on a task object.

The memory 220 may include a user memory area 221, a message thread memory area 222, a task object memory area 223, a task rating memory area 224, and a business rating history memory area 225 . These memory areas 221 to 225 may be implemented as volatile or nonvolatile memory, and may be implemented to be connected via a hyperlink if implemented as a nonvolatile memory.

The user memory area 221 is associated with user information associated with the user terminal 120. Here, the user information may include at least one of a user's name (screen name), a messenger ID, a password, a member group belonging as a member, a list of associated members, and task evaluation point information.

The message thread memory area 222 can be accessed via user information and is associated with a message thread associated with the chat room. The business object memory area 223 can be accessed through user information or message threads and is associated with a business object.

The business rating history memory area 224 can be accessed through user information and is associated with the business rating history. In one embodiment, a business rating history memory area 224 associated with a business rating description of at least one member included in a particular member group may be accessed through user information associated with the at least one member, At least some of them can only be accessed or retrieved through the user information that allows the business object access authority to access the associated business object.

The business rating history memory area 225 can be accessed through user information or business rating details and is associated with the business rating history. In one embodiment, a business rating history memory area 225 associated with a business rating history generated based on a particular business rating history may be accessed through that particular business rating history, and at least some of the business rating history may be accessed by the associated business object Can be inquired only through the user information that the inquiry permission is permitted among the business object access rights.

The storage device 230 may be implemented as a nonvolatile memory such as a solid state disk (SSD) or a hard disk drive (HDD), and is used to store data required by the task evaluation apparatus 110 based on a task object.

The display 240 corresponds to an image display device capable of visually representing data received from the processor 210. For example, the display station 170 may include a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD) crystal display, a light emitting diode (LED), and the like.

The user interface input / output 250 includes an environment for receiving user input and an environment for outputting specific information (e.g., strategy map data) to the user, and may include, for example, a mouse, trackball, touchpad, , An input device including an adapter such as a scanner, a touch screen, a keyboard or a pointing device, and an output device including an adapter such as a monitor or touch screen. In one embodiment, the user interface input / output 250 may correspond to a computing device connected via a remote connection, and in such a case, the business object based business evaluation inquiry device 110 may be implemented as a server.

The network input / output 260 may include an environment for connecting with the user terminal 120 via a network and may include, for example, an adapter for Local Area Network (LAN) communication

Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating the functional elements of the processor in Figure 2;

Referring to FIG. 3, the processor 210 may include a chat room management unit 310, a business rating description providing unit 320, a business rating history providing unit 330, a business object processing unit 340, and a control unit 350 have.

The chat room management unit 310 manages at least one chat room associated with at least one chat room participant and each associated with a message thread capable of inserting business objects including business content, business creators, business processors, and business ratings.

More specifically, the chat room management unit 310 receives a request for creation, modification, and deletion of at least one chat room participated by a member group from the user terminal 120 through a task object messaging agent installed in the user terminal 120 And can manage at least one chat room identified through a chat room identifier and a message thread associated with the chat room based on the received request and can manage each chat room identifier with at least one user information participating in the chat room as a chat room participant Can be associated and stored. The task object processing unit 340 receives a task from the user terminal 120 through a specific chat room in the task object messaging agent and transmits a task object including a task content, a task creator, a task processor, and a task rating to a message Thread, and this content will be described in more detail in the description of the task object processing unit 340. [

In one embodiment, when the task object messaging agent is installed in the user terminal 120 by the user, the user terminal 120 and the business object based task evaluation and inquiry device 110 are connected via the network It is equivalent to an agent program that can be linked and interoperable.

When the business rating request is received from the user terminal 120, the business rating description providing unit 320 calculates the business rating based on the business ratings in the processed business object with respect to each of at least one member of the specific member group associated with the user Provide a breakdown of work scored.

More specifically, the business rating description providing unit 320 can receive, from the user terminal 120 via the business object messaging agent, a business rating inquiry request regarding a specific member group associated with the user. In one embodiment, the business rating description providing unit 320 receives, from the business rating history memory area 224, a business rating history regarding each of at least one user belonging to the specific member group as a member when the business rating inquiry request is received And provide the same to the user terminal 120. In one embodiment, the business grade breakdown for a particular member includes user information (e.g., name, ID, etc.) associated with the particular member, at least one business object associated with the user information Object) and an average business rating calculated based on a business rating in each of the at least one business object.

For example, as shown in FIG. 5, when the business rating inquiry request is received from the user terminal 120 associated with the user Choi Jae-ho, the business rating description providing unit 320 receives the business rating inquiry request from the user terminal 120 associated with the user, The user terminal 120 provides the business ratings of each of the users (Kwak Seung-hoon and the government office) to the user terminal 120, The average task rating (9.5, 8.5, 9.0) for each of the users (Choi Jae-ho, Kwak Seung-hoon,

The business rating history providing unit 320 provides the user rating information and the business rating history access link for each of at least one member belonging to the specific member group associated with the user to the user terminal 120, The rating display field 522 may be used to display the business rating details and provide a link to the business rating history of each member via the business rating history link 526. [

In one embodiment, the business rating description providing unit 320 calculates the business rating details through the average operation processing on all business ratings associated with each user for the entire user at a specific time period, and stores the business rating history memory area 224, For each user. When the service rating history providing unit 320 receives a request to update the service rating information from the user terminal 120, the service rating history provider 320 re-calculates the service rating information regarding each of at least one member associated with the request and provides the service rating information to the user terminal 120 The service rating history stored in the service rating history memory area 224 can be updated.

In one embodiment, the business grade description providing unit 320 may classify the business grade description into a business management rating based on a business creator and a business processing rating based on a business processor with respect to the business object processed with respect to each of the at least one member Can be provided separately. For example, in the process of performing the average operation process on all the business ratings associated with each of the members, the business rating description providing unit 320 determines the business ratings of the corresponding business members, It is possible to calculate the work management score evaluation based on the task creator and the task evaluation score based on the task manager by dividing the task scores evaluated as the processor and performing the average operation processing on each of them, .

In one embodiment, the business rating breakdown providing unit 320 may determine that the user associated with the user terminal 120 in the process of providing the business rating breaks up the calculated average work for all users participating in at least one chat room associated with the chat room participant The rating may be further provided as an average rating of similar performers.

In one embodiment, the business rating description providing unit 320 may reflect the group business ratings calculated and processed for the entire specific group of members based on the business ratings of each of the at least one member. For example, the business rating history provisioning unit 320 may include all the member groups calculated on the basis of the average business ratings of the business objects in the business ratings of the members (Choi Jae-ho, Kwak Seung-hun, (Average of 9.5, 8.5, and 9.0) and group work throughput 1.76 @ 73 (0.9 @ 23, 2.3 @ 38, 1.7 @ And the user terminal 120 may display the group task rating and the group task processing speed together in the task evaluation task inquiry interface 500. [

In one embodiment, the business grade description providing unit 320 receives, from the user terminal 120, a request for sharing including at least one to-be-shared object via the chat room management unit 310, You can create a chat room that is associated with the subject and share the business ratings with the created chat room. For example, the business grade description providing unit 320 receives a job grade rating information including the specific business partners (Choi Jae-ho, Kwak Seung-hun, and the government office) from the user terminal 120 through the business grade rating inquiry interface 500 Request, and the corresponding target persons (Choi Jae-ho, Kwak Seung-hoon, and the government office) create a chat room associated with the chat room participant, or the target chat participants detect a chat room participating as a chat room participant, You can share.

In one embodiment, the business grade description providing unit 320 inserts a business grade history link for electronic inquiry of the business grade description into the message thread associated with the generated chat room, and transmits the business grade description to the corresponding at least one shareee You can share. For example, the business rating history providing unit 320 may insert a business rating history link that can access the business rating information through the business object messaging agent into the corresponding message thread, or browse the web without accessing the business object messaging agent A business grade history link can be created and inserted into the corresponding message thread.

The business rating history providing unit 330 provides a business rating history created based on the business objects in the business rating history of the specific member when the business rating inquiry request for the specific member is received from the user terminal 120. [ In one embodiment, the business rating history provider 330 receives a business rating history access request for a particular member in the business rating history from the user terminal 120 via the business rating messaging agent's business rating history link 526 And reads the business rating history of the specific member from the business rating history memory area 225 and provides the business rating history to the user terminal 120 so that the user terminal 120 can access the business rating history inquiry interface 600) to display a business rating history relating to the business rating history associated with that particular member.

In one embodiment, the business rating history providing unit 330 receives business rating access request information for a business object in the service rating history of the specific member when receiving a business rating inquiry request for a specific member from the user terminal 120 To generate a business rating history. Herein, the business rating history includes the business ratings of each of at least one business object in the business rating history for the particular member, and in one embodiment, among the business content, the business creator (business evaluator) And may further include at least one.

For example, the business rating history providing unit 330 assigns a business object access right that permits access to each of a plurality of business objects in the service rating history of the specific member by the user terminal 120, A task rating history including key information (e.g., each task rating) for each of the plurality of task objects and a task object access link that can access each of the plurality of task objects based on the task object access authority And provide it to the user terminal 120.

In the above embodiment, the business rating history providing unit 330 determines whether or not the business object in the business rating history of the specific member is in the message thread associated with the chat room participated in the corresponding user terminal 120, It is possible to grant the inquiry authority among the access rights. For example, the business rating history providing unit 330 may include a business object identifier, a business content, a business creator, a business processor, a business rating, a processing speed, The chat room identifier, and the associated chat room participant, and if the information on the business objects in the business rating history is as shown in Table 1 below, the user associated with the user (Choi, Jaeho, please) Only the business objects in the message thread associated with the chat rooms (Chat # 1, Chat # 6) participated by the terminal 120 can be detected and the user terminal 120 can be detected in the detected business objects Obj # 1 and Obj # Quot; can be given by the user. In other words, the business rating history providing unit 330 may be configured to provide detailed information (business contents, business creators, etc.) in the corresponding business object only to users participating in the chat room associated with the business object, Etc.). ≪ / RTI >

[Table 1]

In the above embodiment, the business rating history providing unit 330 may grant the business rating change request authority among the business object access authority based on the relationship between the user associated with the user terminal 120 and the specific member. In one embodiment, the business rating history provider 330 may determine the relationship between the user and the specific member in accordance with the vertical relationship between the user and the specific member in the organization chart of the corresponding member group, , If the corresponding user corresponds to an upper manager in the organization chart or a top-level manager in the organization diagram than the specific member, even if the user does not participate in the chat room associated with each business object, the inquiry authority that can be inquired by the corresponding user terminal 120 And can further grant a business rating change request authority to the business object that can be requested by the user terminal 120 to change the business rating. For example, in case of a business object to which a business rating change request authority is given by the corresponding user terminal 120, the business rating history providing unit 330 may determine the business rating of the corresponding business object by the corresponding user terminal 120 When the change request is received, the change request message of the corresponding business grade can be transmitted to the user terminal 120 associated with the business creator of the corresponding business object. If the business grade corrected by the business creator is received The business object can be updated.

In another embodiment, the business rating history provider 330 may include business content related to the business object in the business performance history based on the business object access right. More specifically, the business rating history providing unit 330 determines whether or not a business object in the business rating history of the specific member is in a message thread associated with the chat room participated in the corresponding user terminal 120, The user terminal 120 may grant the business object access right that is accessible by the user terminal 120. In one embodiment, for each business object that the business object access right by the corresponding user terminal 120 is authorized, And a task rating history, which may further include at least one of a task creator (task evaluator), a task processor, and a task processing speed, and provide the task task history to the user terminal 120.

For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the business rating history providing unit 330 receives a business rating inquiry request about a specific member (Kwang Seung Hoon, hsb) from the user terminal 120, The user terminal 120 may be provided with a task rating history 610 based on the task objects of the task rating history inquiry interface 600 and may be displayed on the task rating history display field 610 in the task rating history inquiry interface 600 In this process, the business object access authority is given only to the business objects associated with the chat rooms participated in by the corresponding user terminal 120 based on the information about the plurality of business objects in the business grade rating table (Table 1) In the case of a business object to which a business object access right is granted, it is possible to allow the business content and business creator (business evaluator) to be viewed by the corresponding user terminal 120 In the case of a non-granted business object, only the corresponding business rating can be inquired or the information about the corresponding business object can not be retrieved.

In one embodiment, the business grade history providing unit 330 receives, from the user terminal 120, a sharing request of a business object inquiry permission granted to a business object associated with a specific member, You can temporarily grant authority to view business objects. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the business rating history providing unit 330 receives the business object inquiry permission from the user terminal 120 associated with the user (Choi Jae Ho) through the sharing link provided in the business rating history displaying field 610 The user can receive a sharing request related to the unauthorized business object No. 2 and receive the business object inquiry permission by the user Choi Jae-ho to the user terminal 120 associated with the business creator (for example, the government office) (E.g., 1 day) or a certain number of times (for example, 1 day), and when the approval by the task creator is received, For example, three times).

In one embodiment, the business rating history providing unit 330 may be configured to generate a business rating history for each of the business objects in the business rating history in the course of providing the business rating history, The average task rating may also be provided as an average rating of the similar task attendant. For example, in the case of the first task object shown in FIG. 6, the task score history providing unit 330 further provides an average task score of 8.3 of all task objects created in the chat room associated with the task object as the average score of the similar task performer And displayed through the task rating history display field 610. Accordingly, it is possible to inform that the task rating of the task object 1 related to the task processor is relatively high as compared with the task performer.

The business object processing unit 340 can implement the business object as an independent business message which can be directly accessed in the corresponding chat room and distinguished from the text message or the media message. In one embodiment, the business object processing unit 340 may add a business object as a business message to a message thread that is associated with a chat room and can be represented as a business message and a conversation message pair, or may add a general conversation as a conversation message.

More specifically, the task object processing unit 340 receives a task from a user terminal 120 associated with a user participating in the chat room through a chat room in the task object messaging agent, and is associated with the chat room, A business object including a processor can be created, and a business object operation on the message thread can be processed. For example, the business object processing unit 340 may generate a business object including at least one of business content, business creators, business processors, business deadlines, and evaluation reservation scores based on the received business, The business object created in the associated message thread can be added as a business message.

Here, the task creator corresponds to a user associated with the user terminal 120 that created the task, the task processor corresponds to a user who is designated as an object to process the task by the task creator, Means the maximum upper limit of the evaluation score that can be evaluated by the task creator when completed. Accordingly, the task creator can direct or evaluate the task to the task processor through the task object represented in the task message in the chat room.

The business object processing unit 340 can progress the business object and finally assign a business rating. In one embodiment, the business object processing unit 340 may perform the progress of a business object including at least one of a business deadline and a business process state.

More specifically, the task object processing unit 340 may update a predetermined task processing state in the task processing diagram and update the associated message thread by reflecting a request by one of the task creator and the task processor and a response by the other . In one embodiment, the business object processing unit 340 may receive a business related response from a user terminal 120 associated with a business creator or business processor via a control interface on the business object in the business object messaging agent. Here, the task related response corresponds to a response regarding a task object that can be responded to by a user terminal 120 associated with the task creator or task processor, and in one embodiment, An acknowledgment, a task completion response, and a task evaluation response.

Upon receipt of the task related response, the task object processing unit 220 can determine the current task processing state and update the associated message thread. For example, the task object processing unit 220 can update the current task processing state to a 'doing' state through a work confirmation response with respect to a task object whose current task processing state is 'new' A task object that is in a 'busy' status can be updated to a 'completed' status through a response to a task evaluation response. Each time the current task processing state is changed, the task object processing unit 220 provides the updated task object through the associated message thread as a task message to the participant of the corresponding chat room, The processing state can be recognized.

In one embodiment, the business object processing unit 220 may receive a business evaluation response from the user terminal 120 associated with the business entity with respect to the business object whose current business processing state is 'completed' The business score of the business object can be finally given in such a manner that the business score included in the response and designated by the business creator is included in the business object.

The task object processing unit 340 may reflect the task processing speed calculated on the basis of the number of times of provision of the remind message associated with the task object to the task score. In one embodiment, the remind message corresponds to a message requesting completion of the corresponding task phase according to a specific iteration criterion until the task phase is completed.

More specifically, the task object processing unit 340 may detect at least one task object satisfying a preset remind condition in the task object set to generate a remind message associated with each of the detected task objects, and generate the generated remind message To a user terminal 120 associated with a user designated as a business operator for each business object according to a specific iteration criterion (e.g., transmission in a 12-hour period), and provides the counted number of times of provision each time a remind message is provided It can be stored in association with a business object.

The task object processing unit 340 may generate a reminder message according to the specific repetition criterion by determining a specific repetition criterion based on a task processing state and a task deadline of the task object, and in one embodiment, A specific time period t to which a remind message is to be transmitted may be determined as a specific repetition criterion. For example, in case of the business object whose business deadline is 2017-03-31 and the business processing state is 'In Progress', the business object processing section 340 determines that the current date is 2017-03-27 (d = 4, s = 2) t ₀ = assuming a is set to 12 (hours), it can be calculated as t = 20 (hours), and therefore can transmit to remind message after 20 hours, after transmitting the remind message It is possible to recalculate a specific time period t at the transmission time and reserve the transmission of the remind message according to the re-calculated period. Accordingly, the task object processing unit 340 can provide a reminder message with a shorter repetition period as the task processing state approaches the initial state as the task deadline approaches or exceeds the task deadline.

[Equation 1]

(Where d is the number of days remaining (days) relative to the task deadline specified by the business operator for the business object (positive before the task deadline and negative after the task deadline) S = 1, s = 2, s = 2), s represents the business process state index indicating the current business process state of the business object (for example, 'new' state: s = (T _min , t ₀ , t _max ) corresponds to (minimum period, fundamental period, maximum period) that can be set by a user or a designer, for example, 48) < / RTI > (time)

The task object processing unit 340 may calculate the task processing speed based on the number of times the remind message is provided. In this case, the processing speed indicates whether the task processor has changed the task processing state of the task object by interacting with a few remind messages, and the smaller the calculated value, the faster the task processor has interacted with the task have. For example, if the business processer has changed the business process status in response to the corresponding remind message after the provision of the remind message twice, the business process rate for the business object is 2. In one embodiment, the task object processing unit 340 may calculate and store task processing speeds of the task processors associated with the task objects, respectively, according to task processing states of the task objects.

In one embodiment, the task object processing unit 340 may calculate an average task processing speed of the task processor based on the task processing speed of the task processor calculated by the number of times of provision of the remind and the task processing state associated with the task object. For example, in the process of calculating the average task processing speed based on all the task objects associated with the task processor, the task object processor 340 determines the number of times the task processor has changed the task processing state in response to the provided remind messages And the average of the calculated processing speeds is 2.3, the average processing speed can be calculated as 2.3 @ 38 (see FIG. 6).

In one embodiment, the business object processing unit 340 may calculate the average throughput rate relative to a particular member and relatively relative to the particular member group. For example, in the process of calculating an average task processing speed based on a task object associated with a specific user (Kwak, Seung Hun), the task object processing unit 340 filters task objects associated with a specific member (Choi Jae Ho) Or to filter the business objects associated with a particular group of members (e.g., production 1 team) to yield an average throughput rate. Similarly, the business object processing unit 340 can calculate the group average task processing speed for the specific member group based on the task objects associated with a specific member group (for example, the production 1 team) (For example, the management 2 team) in the process of calculating a specific group of members (for example, management 2 team). Accordingly, the task object processing unit 340 can improve the efficiency of task management by allowing a specific member to check what task processing speed is displayed to another specific member, The task object processing unit 340 can reflect the calculated task processing speed on the task scoring in the task object or include it in the task object. In one embodiment, the business grade description providing unit 320 provides the business grade details including the business processing speed of each of the business objects processed by the business object processing unit 340 and the business ratings reflecting the average business processing speed, 120, and in another embodiment, may provide task ratings that include the task processing speed and task rating of each task object.

The control unit 350 can control the entire operation of the processor 210 and can store data between the chat room management unit 310, the business rating description providing unit 320, the business rating history providing unit 330 and the business object processing unit 340 You can control the flow.

4 is a flowchart illustrating a business evaluation inquiry procedure performed by the processor in FIG.

In FIG. 4, the processor 210 includes at least one chat room associated with a message thread capable of inserting business objects, including business content, business creators, business processors, and business ratings, and each being associated with at least one chat room participant (Step S410).

The processor 210 may receive a business rating inquiry request from the user terminal 120 through the business object messaging agent installed in the user terminal 120 (step S420).

The processor 210 receives a business rating inquiry request from the user terminal 120, and when the request for business rating inquiry is received from the user terminal 120, the service rating history calculated based on the business ratings in the processed business object with respect to each of at least one member belonging to the specific member group (Step S430).

The business rating history providing unit 330 may receive a business rating inquiry request regarding a specific member from the user terminal 120 (step S440).

When the task rating request is received from the user terminal 120, the task rating history provider 330 provides a task rating history generated based on task objects in the task rating history of the specific member (S450).

In one embodiment, the task evaluation apparatus 110 based on the task object may improve the efficiency of the task evaluation inquiry by providing task evaluation results of members evaluated based on task objects, based on task task history.

In one embodiment, the business object based business evaluation inquiry apparatus 110 selectively provides the inquiry authority regarding the business evaluation of the members based on the association with the chat room, thereby preventing the job ratings of the evaluation target persons from being unintentionally exposed can do.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a process of providing task rating information by a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1;

Referring to FIG. 5, a task evaluation apparatus 110 based on a task object receives a task rating inquiry request from a corresponding user through a task rating history inquiry interface 500 in a task agent messaging agent installed in the user terminal 120 And provides the user terminal 120 with a business rating history calculated based on business ratings in the processed business object with respect to each of at least one member belonging to a specific member group associated with the user, And display the business rating history through the business rating history inquiry interface 500. [

The service rating history inquiry interface 500 may include an inquiry time limit input field 510 and a service rating details display field 520.

The task evaluation apparatus 110 based on the business object can receive the inquiry periods 2016-01-01 to 2017-04-13 through the inquiry period input field 510 and can receive the inquiry periods 2016-01-01 to 2017-04-13, ) To the user terminal 120 based on the processed business object within the received query period.

The user terminal 120 calculates a mean task rating (average score) about the task objects in the task score list for each of the members (Choi Jae-ho, Kwak Seung-hun, 9.5, 8.5, 9.0) and the average processing speed (0.9 @ 57, 2.3 @ 98, 1.7 @ 32) are shown in the task rating display field 522 and the task processing speed display field 524). ≪ / RTI >

The task evaluation apparatus 110 based on the task object provides a task score history link to the task score history related to task score histories of the respective members to the user terminal 120, And may provide the link to the user via link 526. [

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a process of providing a task rating history by a task evaluation apparatus based on a task object in FIG. 1. FIG.

5 to 6, the task evaluation apparatus 110 based on a task object may receive a task evaluation message from a specific member (Kwak, Seung Hoon) through a task rating history inquiry interface 500 in a task agent messaging agent installed in the user terminal 120 And provides a business rating history generated based on business objects in the business rating history of the specific member to the user terminal 120 so that the user terminal 120 can view the business rating history inquiry Interface 600 to display a business rating history.

The user terminal 120 is connected to a plurality of tasks in a task rating history of a specific member (Kwak, Seung-hoon) through a task rating history display field 610 based on a task rating history provided from the task evaluation server 110 (9, 7.5, 8.5, 9) of each of the objects (for example, 1 to 4) can be displayed and the corresponding user : Choi Jae-ho) participates and only in relation to the first and fourth business objects related to the business object according to the access right of the business object assigned to the business object, business contents (No. 1: data for sample test analysis, (1: 2, 4: 3) and task evaluators (1: Choi Jae Ho, 4: Choi Jae Ho) can be displayed.

While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims And changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

100: Business evaluation inquiry system
110: Task evaluation based on work object
120: User terminal
210: processor 220: memory
230: Storage device 240: Display
250: User interface input / output 260: Network input / output
310: chat room management unit 320: business rating description service provider
330: business rating history providing unit 340: business object processing unit
350:
500: Business rating history display interface
600: Business rating history lookup interface

Claims (13)

A chat room management unit managing at least one chat room associated with at least one chat room participant, respectively, associated with a message thread capable of inserting a business object including task content, task creator, task processor and task rating;
When a business rating inquiry request is received from a user terminal, providing a business rating item based on a business rating in a processed business object with respect to each of at least one member belonging to a specific member group associated with the user, ; And
And a task rating history providing unit for providing a task rating history generated based on a task object in a task rating history about the specific member when a task rating inquiry request about a specific member is received from the user terminal Evaluation inquiry device.
The method according to claim 1,
The business object processing unit further includes a business object processing unit that implements the business object as an independent business message that can be accessed directly in the corresponding chat room and is distinguished from a text message or a media message and performs the progress of the business object to finally assign the business rating Wherein the business object is a business object.
The method of claim 2, wherein the task object processing unit
And the business processing rate calculated based on the number of times of provision of the remind message which is associated with the business object and requests completion of the corresponding business stage according to a specific iteration criterion until the corresponding business stage is completed Based on a business object.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the task rating history providing unit
Wherein the task rating history is generated by assigning a task object access right to a task object in the task evaluation history about the specific member.
The system according to claim 4, wherein the task rating history providing unit
Based on whether or not a business object in the business grade history about the specific member is in a message thread associated with the chat room participated in by the user terminal, Evaluation inquiry device.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the business rating history providing unit
And a task rating change request authority among the task object access privileges is given based on a relationship between a user associated with the user terminal and the specific member.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the task rating history providing unit
And the business content related to the business object is included in the business performance history based on the business object access right.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the business rating history providing unit
And when the sharing request of the task object inquiry permission granted to the task object associated with the specific member is received from the user terminal, the task object inquiry authority is temporarily granted to the associated task object under the approval of the specific member Object - based task evaluation device.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the service rating history providing unit
Wherein the business performance evaluation unit classifies the business performance ratings into a business management rating based on the business creator and a business performance rating based on the business processor with respect to the business object processed with respect to each of the at least one member, Business evaluation evaluation device.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the service rating history providing unit
Wherein the group rating of each group is calculated on the basis of a rating of each of the at least one member.
The system according to claim 1, wherein the service rating history providing unit
When a sharing request including at least one to-be-shared object related to the business grade description from the user terminal is received, the communication unit creates a chat room associated with the at least one to-be-shared object through the chat room management unit, And a business object based on the business object.
12. The system according to claim 11, wherein the service rating history providing unit
And a business rating history link for electronic inquiry of the business grade ratings is inserted in a message thread associated with the generated chat room to share the business grade ratings to the at least one shareee. Query device.
1. A business object evaluation method based on a business object performed by a business object evaluation based on a business object connected to a user terminal,
Managing at least one chat room associated with at least one chat room participant and each associated with a message thread capable of inserting a business object including task content, task creator, task processor, and task rating;
When a task rating inquiry request is received from the user terminal, providing at least one work item belonging to a specific member group associated with the user, a task rating score providing a task task rating calculated based on task scores in the task task object step; And
And a task rating history providing step of providing a task rating history generated based on a task object in a task rating history about the specific member when a task rating inquiry related to a specific member is received from the user terminal How to view job evaluation.

Images