KR20180013474A - Method and apparatus for assisting strategy map management based on schedule-assessment item and todo-assessment item - Google Patents

Abstract

A business strategy map management method is executed by a business strategy map management server connected to a business strategy map user terminal. The method comprises: a project step of providing (1) a schedule-evaluation item having a schedule time line defined through start schedule and deadline schedule and business evaluation defined by unit of corresponding business or a plurality of sub-businesses for each of at least one business constituting a project read from a schedule-evaluation memory area, and (2) a business execution organization dependently associated with the schedule-evaluation item read from a business execution organization memory area; and a task step of providing a task-evaluation item having a task content designating a task constructor and task evaluation evaluated through a task creator about a task read from a task memory area, dependently associated with the schedule evaluation item, and defined by necessity of the task creator at the time of doing the business.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates to a business strategy map management method and apparatus for supporting the execution of business strategy based on an evaluation item,

The present invention relates to a business strategy map management technology, and more particularly, to a business strategy map management technology that supports execution of business strategy based on schedule-evaluation items and task-evaluation items that can efficiently manage business projects performed by a task performing organization And more particularly, to a method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map.

Enterprise ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) is mainly developed and built by experts based on related industry and business processes to optimize them.

Conventional Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) has many limitations in efficiently managing the schedule of work projects performed by a plurality of task performing organizations.

Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-0021858 (Mar. 22, 2007) discloses an electronic network-based business schedule management apparatus, which improves the efficiency of corporate business progress, It is possible to improve the work efficiency by giving mileage according to the characteristic of work.

Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 10-2009-0001748 (2009.01.09) relates to a system and method for providing a messenger service for an enterprise, and more particularly to a system and method for providing a messenger service for a corporate, And moreover, to a system and a method for providing a messenger service for an enterprise that enables communication with a messenger user of a company of a third party.

[0002] Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-0026086 (Mar. 3, 2010) discloses a business instruction system and method, and is a business instruction system for instructing a person in charge to perform an operation, ; And a database for storing overall business information on all of the operational tasks to be performed over a period of two or more days, And transmits the generated daily task information to the correspondent terminal. Thus, the operation can be stably performed.

1. Korean Unexamined Patent Publication No. 10-2007-0021858 (Feb. 23, 2007) 2. Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 10-2009-0001748 (2009.01.09) 3. Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2010-0026086 (Mar. 10, 2010)

An embodiment of the present invention is to provide a business strategy map management method and apparatus capable of efficiently managing business projects and schedules performed by a business performance organization.

An embodiment of the present invention is to provide a business strategy map management method and apparatus capable of efficiently managing and evaluating work project schedule based on schedule-evaluation items.

An embodiment of the present invention is to provide a business strategy map management method and apparatus capable of evaluating a business project schedule through an evaluation matrix and efficiently reflecting it in evaluation and information processing of business execution personnel.

An embodiment of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for managing a task strategy map capable of efficiently managing and evaluating tasks related to task projects based on task tasks and evaluation items.

Among the embodiments, the task strategy map management method performed in the task strategy map management server supporting the performance of the task strategy based on the schedule-evaluation item and the task-to-evaluate item is as follows: (1) A schedule-time item defined by a start schedule and a deadline schedule for each of at least one task constituting the task and a task-evaluation item defined by the task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks, and (2) A project step for providing a task performance organization that is subordinated to the schedule-evaluation item read out from the organization memory area, a project step for reading out the task step from the to-be-memorized area and being associated with the schedule evaluation item, What to do with what is specified by the to-do handler And a step of providing the assessment items do-do-do have a rating that is evaluated by the constructor.

The project step is a step of evaluating the corresponding task or the plurality of corresponding sub-tasks from the manager task strategy map user terminal through the evaluation matrix defined by the task processor, the task goal score and the task score, And a task evaluation step for receiving the task evaluation.

The project step stores the actually completed timeline in the schedule-evaluation item when the task evaluation is completed and determines the cooperativity of the task performing organization based on analysis between the defined schedule line and the actually completed schedule timeline ), Which is a function of the system.

Wherein the step of performing comprises the steps of: receiving a business activity that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item before the provision of the task-evaluation item, the business activity including a task description created by the task performing organization regarding the project or the at least one task; Activity recording step.

The business activity may include a business improvement proposal for the project or each of the at least one business.

The step of performing the task includes a task activity reflecting step of requesting at least a task performing organization in the task performing organization to request a suggestion response regarding the task improvement suggestion and supporting a change regarding a part of the task when the task improvement proposal is received .

Wherein the task step comprises a message thread that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item prior to the provision of the task-evaluation item and includes at least one message that can be shared with the project, the at least one task, And a business activity discussion step of providing a chat room that can be implemented through the Internet.

The step of notifying may further include notifying the corresponding task performing agent through the task messenger whenever the message thread is updated.

The step of performing the task may further include generating a task-evaluation item as one of the at least one message.

Wherein the task step includes a task activity evaluating activity of the project with respect to the task performing organization based on the number of task-evaluating items given to the specific task performing organization with respect to the total number of task-evaluating items in a specific time period And an evaluation step.

The task step may include a project suitability evaluation step of evaluating the adaptability of the project to the specific task performing organization based on an average evaluation of task-to-evaluate items given to a specific task performing organization in a specific time period have.

The task step is to set the task activity as a main task activity that can notify the members other than the task performing organization if the sum of the scheduled scores of the task-to-be- And may further comprise a setting step.

The schedule-evaluation item includes an associator for business activities for accessing business activities stored in a business activity memory area and a message thread for storing at least one message that is stored in a message memory area and can be shared about the business activity Further comprising a chat room associator for accessing a chat room that can be implemented through the at least one of the at least one message and the at least one of the at least one message.

Among the embodiments, the task strategy map management server includes a processor unit, a memory unit including a schedule-evaluation memory area, a task performing organization memory area, and a task memory area, (1) a schedule line defined by a start schedule and a deadline schedule with respect to each of at least one task constituting a project from the schedule-evaluation memory area, and a schedule time line defined by a corresponding task or a plurality of corresponding sub- (2) a task performance organization that is subordinately related to the schedule-evaluation item from the task performance organization memory area, (b) a task performance organization that is subordinate to the schedule evaluation item To-do with respect to what is defined by the need of the to-do generator when dealing with said task To do with the assessment that evaluates to do with the information given to do, and constructors to do - get an evaluation item.

In embodiments, the recording medium records a business strategy map management method performed on a business strategy map server including a processor unit and a memory unit including a constant-evaluation memory area and a to-do memory area, (1) a schedule line defined by a start schedule and a deadline with respect to each of at least one task constituting a project read out from the schedule-evaluation memory area, and a task defined by a corresponding task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks Evaluation item having an evaluation and (2) a project step for providing a task performance organization that is dependent on the schedule-evaluation item read out from the task performance organization memory area, To the needs of the to-do generator when processing the relevant task Having to do with the assessment that evaluates to do more and do constructors specify a handler to do that is to do with respect to defined-do-do includes the steps of providing an evaluation item.

The disclosed technique may have the following effects. It is to be understood, however, that the scope of the disclosed technology is not to be construed as limited thereby, as it is not meant to imply that a particular embodiment should include all of the following effects or only the following effects.

The method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map according to an embodiment of the present invention can efficiently manage a business project performed by a business performing organization.

A method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention can efficiently manage business projects and schedules performed by a task performing organization.

The method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map according to an embodiment of the present invention can efficiently manage and evaluate a business project schedule based on a schedule-evaluation item.

The method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map according to an embodiment of the present invention can evaluate the business project schedule through the evaluation matrix and efficiently reflect the evaluation of the business project schedule in the evaluation and information processing of business execution personnel.

The method and apparatus for managing a business strategy map according to an embodiment of the present invention can efficiently manage and evaluate a task related to a business project based on a task-evaluating item.

1 is a diagram illustrating a business strategy map management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a block diagram illustrating the business strategy map management server of FIG.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a business strategy map management procedure performed by the business strategy map management server shown in FIG. 2, focusing on a project stage.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a task strategy map management procedure performed by the task strategy map management server in FIG. 2, with reference to a task step.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a process in which the task strategy map executor shown in FIG. 2 performs a project stage.
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the visualization of a schedule-evaluation item list by the business strategy map user terminal of FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a process of adding a schedule-evaluation item (FIG. 7A) and a schedule-evaluation item list screen (FIG. 7B) updated by the task strategy map user terminal of FIG.
FIG. 8 is a view showing a schedule-evaluation item list screen shown before and after the task evaluation of the task strategy map user terminal shown in FIG. 1; FIG.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a process of adding a to-do item to the task strategy map user terminal of FIG. 1; FIG.
10 is a view showing a business history (activity record) list screen shown in the business strategy map user terminal of FIG.
FIG. 11 is a view showing a task chatting screen screen that is dependent on a specific schedule-evaluation item shown in the task strategy map user terminal of FIG.

The description of the present invention is merely an example for structural or functional explanation, and the scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited by the embodiments described in the text. That is, the embodiments are to be construed as being variously embodied and having various forms, so that the scope of the present invention should be understood to include equivalents capable of realizing technical ideas. Also, the purpose or effect of the present invention should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention, since it does not mean that a specific embodiment should include all or only such effect.

Meanwhile, the meaning of the terms described in the present application should be understood as follows.

The terms "first "," second ", and the like are intended to distinguish one element from another, and the scope of the right should not be limited by these terms. For example, the first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as a first component.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected to the other element, but there may be other elements in between. On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between. On the other hand, other expressions that describe the relationship between components, such as "between" and "between" or "neighboring to" and "directly adjacent to" should be interpreted as well.

It is to be understood that the singular " include " or "have" are to be construed as including the stated feature, number, step, operation, It is to be understood that the combination is intended to specify that it does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

In each step, the identification code (e.g., a, b, c, etc.) is used for convenience of explanation, the identification code does not describe the order of each step, Unless otherwise stated, it may occur differently from the stated order. That is, each step may occur in the same order as described, may be performed substantially concurrently, or may be performed in reverse order.

All terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs, unless otherwise defined. Commonly used predefined terms should be interpreted to be consistent with the meanings in the context of the related art and can not be interpreted as having ideal or overly formal meaning unless explicitly defined in the present application.

1 is a diagram illustrating a business strategy map management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, a business strategy map management system 100 includes a business strategy map management server 110 and a business strategy map user terminal 120, which may be connected via a network.

The task strategy map management server 110 may include a non-volatile memory (not shown), may be remotely connected by at least one task strategy map user terminal 120, and may include a plurality of memory areas 221 To 225 can be synchronized to non-volatile memory. For example, non-volatile memory may be implemented through a database. The task strategy map management server 110 may be connected to at least one task strategy map user terminal 120 to perform a task strategy map management method and may receive a message transmitted from at least one task strategy map user terminal 120 You can manage grouped message threads.

The business strategy map user terminal 120 may correspond to a computing device that performs a business management process of an enterprise through a business strategy map. For example, the business strategy map user terminal 120 may be implemented as a desktop, laptop, tablet PC, or smart phone.

2 is a block diagram illustrating the business strategy map management server of FIG.

2, the task strategy map management server 110 includes a processor unit 210, a memory unit 220, a storage unit 230, a network interface unit 240, a user interface input unit 250, (260).

The processor unit 210 may include a task strategy map executor 212, a memory manager 214, and a memory synchronization scheduler 216. The task strategy map executor 212 may execute the task strategy map management procedure shown in FIG. 3 and may include various pieces of information from the memory areas 221 to 225 during the execution process, ). The memory manager 214 may manage the memory areas 221-225 in the memory 220 that are read or created by the task strategy map executor 212. [ The memory synchronization scheduler 216 may schedule the synchronization time between the memory areas 221 to 225 and the non-volatile memory in the task strategy map management server 110.

The memory unit 220 includes a schedule-evaluation memory area 221, a task performing organization memory area 222, a task memory area 223, a task activity memory area 224, and a message memory area 225 . These memory areas 221 to 225 may be implemented as volatile or nonvolatile memory, and may be implemented to be connected via a hyperlink if implemented as a nonvolatile memory.

The schedule-evaluation memory area 221 is defined as a schedule time line (see 530) defined by a start schedule and a deadline with respect to each of at least one task constituting the project and a task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks Evaluation item (see FIG. 6) having the task evaluation that has been performed. In one embodiment, the schedule-evaluation item may further include a chat room associator for accessing a chat room that may be implemented through an associate and message thread for accessing business activities to access business activities.

The task performing organization memory area 222 includes a task performing organization that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item. Herein, the task performing organization means at least one task performing organization including at least one task processor performing at least one task associated with a specific schedule-evaluation item.

The to-do memory area 223 is associated with the schedule-evaluation item and has to-do evaluations through the to-do constructor specifying the to-do handler with respect to the to-do definition defined by the needs of the to-do generator when processing the task, To-do items. In one embodiment, the to-do item may correspond to at least a portion of at least one message that can be shared about business activity.

The business activity memory area 224 may store business activity (see FIG. 10). In one embodiment, the business activity is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item and may include a business improvement proposal for the project or at least one of the tasks.

The message memory area 225 stores a message thread (see FIG. 11) that contains at least one message that can be shared about business activity. In one embodiment, the message memory area 225 may store a message thread that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item and that includes at least one message that can be shared with the project, at least one task, or each business activity .

The storage unit 230 may be implemented as a nonvolatile memory such as a solid state disk (SSD) or a hard disk drive (HDD), and is used to store data required by the task strategy map management server 110.

The network interface unit 240 includes an environment for connecting with the task strategy map user terminal 120 through a network and may include an adapter for LAN (Local Area Network) communication, for example.

The user interface input 250 includes an environment for receiving user input and may include, for example, an adapter such as a mouse, trackball, touchpad, graphic tablet, scanner, touch screen, keyboard or pointing device. The user interface output 260 includes an environment for outputting specific information (e.g., a certain timeline) to a user and may include, for example, an adapter such as a monitor or a touch screen.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a business strategy map management procedure performed by the business strategy map management server shown in FIG. 2, focusing on a project stage.

The task strategy map executor 212 receives from the schedule-evaluation memory area 221 a schedule time line 530 defined by a start schedule and a deadline with respect to each of at least one task constituting the project, Evaluation items having task evaluations defined in units of sub-tasks, and performing a project step of importing a task performance organization that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation items from the task performance organization memory area 222 (Step S310). This will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a process in which the task strategy map executor 212 of FIG. 2 performs the project steps. In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may retrieve and provide information from the schedule-evaluation memory area 221, including project, task and schedule timelines, to the task strategy map user terminal 120, 5, in the task strategy map user terminal 120, a project cell 510 is arranged on the horizontal axis, and a time cell 520 (see FIG. 5) including year, ), And to visualize a task strategy map schedule matrix 500 that places a schedule timeline 530 grouping at least one intersection point. The task strategy map executor 212 may add a project cell 510 or a certain timeline 530 according to a user's request and the time cell 520 may include at least one task included in a certain timeline 530 Can be adjusted according to the start schedule and deadline schedule for each.

In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may retrieve task performance organization information that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item from the task performance organization memory area 222 and provide it to the task strategy map user terminal 120 , The task strategy map user terminal 120 may assist in visualizing a schedule-evaluation item list that is subordinate to a particular project, as in FIG. For example, the business strategy map executor 212 receives a schedule-evaluation item list query request that is related to a specific project (high-temperature filter (Japanese vendor)) by the user from the business strategy map user terminal 120 (When clicking the high temperature filter 510 or clicking on the relevant schedule timeline 530 in the job strategy map schedule matrix 500), a list of schedule-evaluation items ('Improve filter function quality index' and ' Filter market research ') to the business strategy map user terminal 120 (FIG. 6). 6, which shows the above embodiment, the progress state includes' completion 'and' in progress', but in another embodiment, the progress state may be 'new', 'during', ' . ≪ / RTI >

The task strategy map executor 212 may add a schedule-evaluation item at the request of the user (step S320). In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212, when receiving a schedule-evaluation item addition request by the user from the task strategy map user terminal 120 (at the "add schedule" , Sub-task (no), person receiving the schedule (worker, number of beneficiaries), start schedule (2013-12-18) , A deadline schedule 2013-12-31, and a new schedule-evaluation item having an evaluation score (target score, maximum 7 points) (step S320). In one embodiment, a sub-task corresponds to a plurality of sub-tasks for performing one task, and a specific sub-task setting is not necessarily required to add one schedule-evaluation item. When a new schedule-evaluation item (strength check by sample testing) is added, the task strategy map executor 212 can store the new schedule-evaluation item in the schedule-evaluation memory area 221, (E.g., strength test by sample testing), as shown in FIG. 7B in FIG. 7B, and may provide information to the high-temperature filter 500 in the task strategy map schedule matrix 500 510) to be updated.

When the task is completed in the project stage, the task strategy map executor 212 obtains, from the manager task strategy map user terminal, an evaluation defined by the task processor, the task goal score and the task score about the task or a plurality of corresponding sub- A task evaluation step may be performed to receive the task evaluation evaluated through the matrix (step S330). Here, the task evaluation may be defined as a task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks. In one embodiment, the manager business strategy map user terminal corresponds to a business strategy map user terminal 120 that the user is identified as having a business designator or an evaluation authority. In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 can provide schedule-rating item inquiry information to the task strategy map user terminal 120, and as shown in Fig. 8, the specific project (high- Evaluation item for a specific task (sample test and strength check) having a plurality of sub-tasks (strength 120% confirmation, strength 150% confirmation, strength 200% confirmation) . In the above embodiment, each of the sub-tasks may be automatically classified into a progress state including steps 1, 2, and 3 based on a start schedule or a deadline schedule, When the progress status of the sub-tasks is changed to completion (for example, the task performer can click the progress status cell to change the progress status), the user corresponding to the task designator can receive the task strategy map user terminal (E.g., a task specifier can assign a score by mouse clicking on the score cell) through the task 120 (e.g., sample testing and strength verification).

In the above embodiment, the task score can be given an evaluation score at the upper limit of the target score (5, 7, 3) of each of the assigned sub-tasks, 4, 6, 3) / (5, 7, 3), that is, 13 out of 15 points out of the total score of the target score.

When the task evaluation is completed, the task strategy map executor 212 may receive the task evaluation evaluated through the evaluation matrix from the task strategy map user terminal 120 (step S330). In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 constructs an evaluation matrix having a 3 x 3 matrix structure based on the name, target score, and evaluation score of the task processor for each of the sub-tasks for that task And receives an Appraisal Matrix (AM) configured as follows from the task strategy map user terminal 120 and applies it to subsequent evaluation related operations to obtain information about a plurality of sub-task task performers associated with a particular task The processing efficiency can be doubled.

[Evaluation matrix before work evaluation (A.M.) - Figure 8a]

[Evaluation matrix after business evaluation (A.M.) - Figure 8b]

[Evaluation Matrix (A.M.) after only the business evaluation for sub-task 1 (strength 120% confirmation) in Fig. 8B]

The task strategy map executor 212 may store the received task evaluation results including the evaluation matrix in the constant-evaluation memory area, and may update the related information stored in the constant-evaluation memory area upon receiving the changed evaluation matrix, The updated evaluation matrix may be provided when the schedule-evaluation item inquiry is requested from the task strategy map user terminal 120 (step S340).

The task strategy map executor 212 stores the actually completed schedule timeline in the schedule-evaluation item when the task evaluation is completed in the project stage, and performs the task of the task performing organization based on the analysis between the defined schedule timeline and the actually completed schedule timeline A task performance evaluation step for automatically evaluating cooperativity may be performed (step S350). In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may define the task strategy map through a completion date that is actually completed by the task person on a day corresponding to a predetermined timeline (TS) defined through a deadline designated by the task assigner D (Difference) 'is a value obtained by counting the difference between days corresponding to the finished schedule (FS) (for example, if the deadline is December 27, the completion date is December 25 D is a positive number +2, and if the completion date is January 2 of the following year, D is a negative number of -6), then cooperativity can be calculated by applying Equation 1 below.

[Equation 1]

Ave_g (D) is the average of the D-sum for the specific task performing organization, excluding the bottom 20%, and ave_t (D) is the average of the D- )

In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 applies the above Equation (1) to calculate the cooperativity of a specific task performing organization with the results of task cooperative work for all task performing organizations And calculate the best business cooperation with respect to the position of the top 20% of the entire task performing organization and provide the best business cooperation to the task strategy map user terminal 120.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a task strategy map management procedure performed by the task strategy map management server in FIG. 2, with reference to a task step.

The task strategy map executor 212 is responsible for carrying out task activities that are subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item before the task-evaluating item is provided in the task step and include the task details created by the task performing team regarding the project or at least one task And perform a business activity recording step of receiving (step S410). In one embodiment, the schedule-evaluation item may include an associate for a business activity to access business activity, and the business strategy map executor 212 may depend on a particular schedule-evaluation item Reads the corresponding business activity from the business activity memory area 224 based on the associator related to the business activity to be associated with the business activity including the business description created by the business performing organization about the project or at least one business And provide it to the business strategy map user terminal 120. According to the above embodiment, the result of querying the business activity list in the business strategy map user terminal 120 can be displayed as in FIG. 10, and the business activity added or modified by the user can be expressed as In the work activity memory area 224, and can update the work activity memory area 224.

The task strategy map launcher 212 includes at least one message that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item before provision of the task-evaluating item in the task step and that can be shared with the project, each of the at least one task, A business activity discussion step of providing a chat room that can be implemented through the message thread may be performed (step S420). In one embodiment, the schedule-evaluation item may include a chat room associator for accessing a chat room that may be implemented via a message thread, and the task strategy map executor 212 may include a specific schedule- The user can read the corresponding message thread from the message memory area 225 based on the chat room associator for accessing the chat room that can be implemented through a message thread (chat room) And can be expressed as shown in FIG.

The task strategy map executor 212 is connected to the schedule-evaluation item from the to-do memory area 223, and when processing the task, the task strategy map executor 212 generates a to-do list To-be-evaluated item having a to-do rating to be evaluated through the to-do item (step S430). In one embodiment, when the task strategy map executor 212 receives a task-to-assess item list query request that is dependent on a particular schedule-evaluation item by the user in the task strategy map user terminal 120 (e.g., (Not shown) request for a to-do item to be assessed associated with a specific schedule-to-be-evaluated item included in the schedule-evaluation item inquiry screen of the to-do item, You can provide a list.

The task strategy map executor 212 may additionally generate a task-evaluation item according to a user's request. The task strategy map executor 212 may further perform a business activity update step (step S440), which includes generating a task-evaluation item in one of at least one message in the task step. In one embodiment, as depicted in FIG. 9, the task strategy map user terminal 120 is responsible for task scheduling map users who are dependent on specific scheduling-evaluation items (sample checking and strength checking) Evaluation item addition request for a to-do item having a to-do list (number of revisions), a due date (2015-1-5), and a reserved score (maximum goal score, 3 points) is received, the task strategy map executor 212 To-be-evaluated item information can be stored in the to-do memory area 223 and the task strategy map user terminal 120 can read and provide related information from the to-be-accessed memory area 223.

The task strategy map executor 212 may further perform a task activity notification step including notifying the corresponding task execution personnel through the task messenger whenever a message thread is updated in the task task. The task strategy map executor 212 may store the evaluation score in the toll memory area 223 when evaluation is performed on the task-to-evaluate item related to the specific task.

The task strategy map executor 212 calculates the activity of the project for the task performing organization based on the number of task-evaluating items given to the specific task performing organization relative to the total task-evaluating items in the specific time period at the task stage, (Step S450). ≪ / RTI > In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may calculate the activity of a project for a task performing organization by applying Equation (2) below.

&Quot; (2) "

(Where T is the sum of the number of To-do-evaluation items given to a specific task performing organization during a particular time interval, and ave (T) is the task-to- The average of the sum of the number of evaluation items is the average excluding the lower 20%)

In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 compares the result of calculating the activity of the project with respect to a specific task performing organization by applying Equation (2) above, To the business strategy map user terminal 120 by calculating the exemplary activity level of how much the user is located relative to the top 20% of the total task performance members.

The task strategy map executor 212 is a task adaptation evaluation system that evaluates the adaptability of a project to a specific task performing organization based on an average evaluation of a task-to-evaluate item given to a specific task performing member in a specific time period at a task step (Step S450). In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may calculate the adaptability of the project to a particular task performing organization by applying Equation 3 below.

&Quot; (3) "

Where A (Appraisal) corresponds to the average of the sum of the scores of the to-do items given to a specific task performing member during a certain time interval, and ave (A) corresponds to a task-to- The average of the sum of the items' evaluation points is the average excluding the lower 20%)

In one embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 compares the result of calculating the adaptability of the project to a specific task performing organization by applying Equation (3) above to the adaptability calculation results of the project for all the task performing members And calculates the exemplary adaptability of how much the user is located relative to the top 20% of the total task performance members, and provides the calculated adaptability to the task strategy map user terminal 120.

When the sum of the reservation scores of the task-to-be-assessed items that depend on the specific task activity in a specific time interval in the task step is greater than a specific criterion, the task strategy map executor 212 notifies the members other than the task performing organization You can perform more important business setup steps that you set up as business activities. In one embodiment, the reserved score means the maximum goal score, which is included in the specific to-do item and which is the maximum upper limit of the score that can be evaluated through the to-do generator with respect to the to-do item. In one embodiment, as in FIG. 10, a business activity that is dependent on a particular schedule-evaluation item (a strength test by sample testing) and includes a business record (activity record) created by a specific business performance member If the sum of the reservation scores (25 points) of the to-do items and the evaluation items depending on the activity is equal to or greater than the specific criterion (20 points), the business strategy map executor 212 can set the business activities as major business activities, 120) may have a visual indication that emphasizes the business activity, or may automatically send remind mail to the task performing personnel associated with the project.

In one embodiment, the task activity may include a task improvement proposal for each task or at least one task. The task strategy map executor 212 requests at least a part of the task executing organization in the task performing organization to request a suggestion response about the task improvement proposal when the task improvement proposal is received in the task task, The reflection step can be further performed. In one embodiment, when a new activity record including a task improvement proposal is added by the user in the task strategy map user terminal 120 through the 'add activity record' of FIG. 10, the task strategy map executor 212 displays the corresponding schedule- A message may be sent to the task performing member of at least one team associated with the evaluation project to request a proposal response regarding the task improvement proposal. In another embodiment, the task strategy map executor 212 may assist in changing the project schedule and contents, etc., in consultation with the task execution personnel when the task improvement proposal is received, and the task strategy map executor 212 may, A message requesting the project schedule and contents change is sent according to the proposal, and upon receiving a reply indicating that the work performing organization member having a certain ratio or more agrees with the message, the project schedule and the contents are changed so that the plurality of memory areas 221 ≪ / RTI > 225) and to update the task strategy map schedule matrix (500).

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims It can be understood that

100: Business strategy map management system
110: business strategy map management server 120: business strategy map user terminal
210:
212: Business Strategy Map Launcher 214: Memory Manager
216: Memory Sync Scheduler
220:
221: schedule-evaluation memory area 222: task performing organization memory area
223: to-do memory area 224: business activity memory area
225: Message memory area
230:
240: Network interface unit
250: User interface input
260: User interface output section

Claims (15)

A task strategy map supporting a task strategy based on a schedule-evaluation item and a task-to-be-evaluated item, the method comprising:
(1) a schedule line defined by a start schedule and a deadline with respect to each of at least one task constituting a project read out from the schedule-evaluation memory area, and a task defined by a corresponding task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks Evaluation item having an evaluation and (2) a project stage for providing a task performance organization that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item read from the task performance organization memory area; And
To-do items, which are read from the to-do memory area and are related to the schedule-evaluation item and are defined by the need of the to-do creator when processing the corresponding task, A task strategy map management method comprising a task step of providing task-to-task items.
2. The method of claim 1,
When the corresponding task is completed, a task evaluation evaluated through the evaluation matrix defined by the task processor, the task goal score and the task evaluation score about the corresponding task or the plurality of corresponding sub-tasks from the manager task strategy map user terminal And a task evaluation step of receiving a business strategy map.
3. The method of claim 2,
When the task evaluation is completed, the actually completed schedule timeline is stored in the schedule-evaluation item, and the cooperativity of the task performing organization is automatically calculated based on the analysis between the defined schedule timeline and the actually completed schedule timeline And evaluating a task performing organization to be evaluated.
2. The method according to claim 1,
A business activity recording step of receiving a business activity that is related to the schedule-evaluation item before the provision of the task-evaluation item and that includes a task description created by the task performing organization about the project or the at least one task, Wherein the business strategy map management method comprises the steps of:
5. The method of claim 4,
And a task improvement proposal for each of the project or the at least one task.
6. The method according to claim 5,
And a business activity reflecting step of requesting at least some business performance members in the business performance organization for a proposal response regarding the business improvement proposal to support a change regarding a part of the project when the business improvement proposal is received A business strategy map management method characterized by.
5. The method according to claim 4,
Is implemented through a message thread that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item prior to the provision of the task-evaluation item and that includes at least one message that can be shared with the project, the at least one task, or each task activity And a business activity discussion step of providing a chat room in which the business activity map can be provided.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of performing comprises:
Further comprising the step of notifying the corresponding task execution personnel via the task messenger whenever the message thread is updated.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of performing comprises:
Further comprising a business activity update step including the step of creating the task-evaluation item as one of the at least one message.
10. The method according to claim 9,
And a project activity evaluation step of evaluating the activity of the project with respect to the task performing organization based on the number of task-evaluation items given to the specific task performing organization relative to the total task-evaluation items in the specific time period Wherein the business strategy map management method comprises:
10. The method according to claim 9,
Evaluating the adaptability of the project to the specific task performing organization based on an average evaluation of task-to-evaluate items given to a specific task performing organization in a specific time period. How to manage strategy maps.
5. The method according to claim 4,
If the sum of the reservation points of the evaluation item exceeds the specified standard, the main task setting step is set as the main business activity that can inform the members other than the task performing organization, Wherein the business strategy map management method comprises the steps of:
The method of claim 1, wherein the schedule-
Associates relating to business activities for accessing business activities stored in the business activity memory area; And
Further comprising a chat room associator for accessing a chat room that can be implemented through a message thread that includes at least one message stored in a message memory area and that can be shared about the business activity,
Wherein at least some of the at least one message corresponds to a to-do item stored in the to-do memory area.
1. A business strategy map management server comprising a memory unit including a processor unit, a schedule-evaluation memory area, a task performing organization memory area, and a to-do memory area,
The processor unit
(a) (1) A schedule line defined by a start schedule and a deadline schedule for each of at least one task constituting a project from the schedule-evaluation memory area, and a predetermined time line defined by the task or a plurality of corresponding sub- (2) a task performance organization that is subordinately related to the schedule-evaluation item from the task performance organization memory area,
(b) a to-do content, which is associated with the predetermined evaluation item from the to-do memory area, and which is defined by the to-do creator, Task-strategy map management server that obtains to-do items that have to-do items.
A business strategy map management method performed on a business strategy map management server including a processor unit, a constant-evaluation memory area, and a memory unit including a toll memory area,
(1) a schedule line defined by a start schedule and a deadline with respect to each of at least one task constituting a project read out from the schedule-evaluation memory area, and a task defined by a corresponding task or a plurality of corresponding sub-tasks Evaluation item having an evaluation and (2) a project stage for providing a task performance organization that is subordinate to the schedule-evaluation item read from the task performance organization memory area; And
A to-do list, which is read from the to-do memory area and is related to the predetermined evaluation item and is defined by the to-do creator's need when the task is processed, To-be-evaluated item.

Images