KR20170129395A - A training evaluation device for simulator of overhead crane - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a training evaluation device of a ceiling crane simulator and, more specifically, to a device for evaluating training of a trainer by using information of enabling the trainer to move a heavy weight in a simulator in a training system using the simulator which enables the trainer to moves the heavy weight displayed on a screen with a lever. The training evaluation device of the ceiling crane simulator comprises: a training evaluation data obtaining unit; an obtained data calculating unit; and an outputting unit. The training evaluation data obtaining unit obtains a plurality of pieces of predetermined training result information for each evaluation interval, and heavy weight position information from the simulator when ceiling crane training is performed in the simulator; and accumulates training result data of the total evaluation intervals and the heavy weight position information. The obtained data calculating unit derive an evaluation result by scoring the training result data of the total evaluation intervals collected by the training evaluation data obtaining unit based on evaluation items, evaluation points, and evaluation criteria which are predetermined for each of the evaluation intervals; and stores the derived evaluation result with the accumulated heavy weight position data in a performance management database. The outputting unit provides the derived evaluation result to the trainer and an evaluator.

Description

[0001] The present invention relates to a training evaluation device for a ceiling crane,

The present invention relates to a training evaluation apparatus for a ceiling crane simulator, and more particularly, to an evaluation method for each evaluation element for a result of training a practical skill examination test course of a ceiling crane by using a virtual reality-based ceiling crane simulator And a device for feedbacking a training result to a user after real-time scoring based on the evaluation method.

Ceiling crane is a mechanical device that is used in various fields such as heavy industry, manufacturing, logistics, construction, harbor, etc. However, in reality, most of the places do not have licenses. It is a reality that it can not perform properly due to a problem.

Due to these limitations, the frequency of safety accidents in the workplace is increasing every year, and many accidents have been reported. In order to prevent such accidents, the Safety and Health Corporation has carried out special safety training on ceiling crane throughout the country. The Industrial Workers' .

If the e-learning is a training method in which the transfer of knowledge and the training of the examinees are unidirectional, the virtual training system (training, e-Training) There is an advantage that education can be carried out.

In particular, this virtual training system is a new alternative to complement and strengthen industrial training by utilizing advanced technology, and realistic / active learning is provided to learners by carrying out experiential type training and training in experiment / practice and equipment training Can improve the learning effect, and is emerging as a new growth engine of the future.

In addition, there is a growing interest in developing and disseminating a virtual training system suitable for minimizing investment in high-priced equipment and training risk avoidance while meeting the demand for human resource training in the industrial field. Such a virtual training system should allow users to experience virtual scenarios that are not the same or physically impossible as the actual situation, and an automatic evaluation of the operation system and training results similar to the actual device should be made.

A trainee who prepares for a ceiling crane driver 's qualification verification practical training test is paid an expensive price of 100 ~ 1.5 million won and is being trained by a real ceiling crane. In addition to the instructor training, the actual equipment training is costly because the training manpower and assistant manpower are needed and the equipment operation cost is also high. Also, due to the limited number of equipment, repeated training is not easy and there are many restrictions on time and space.

In addition, in evaluating the results of ceiling crane operation training, it is difficult to achieve an objective evaluation of the criteria for qualification of ceiling crane driving technician qualification because it is made only by the subjective evaluation of the instructor. In particular, trainees or novices who are new to ceiling crane operation are not able to operate well, so the trainer who supervises / supervises the training will have to increase the fatigue, and this fatigue can evaluate the same training results differently. Using a virtual reality-based ceiling crane simulator that reflects objective training results for beginners, beginners can clearly identify what mistakes they have committed, and more effectively train the ones that are lacking in the next training You will be able to do it.

It is an object of the present invention to propose a virtual reality-based ceiling crane training evaluation device which can verify the results of training with a virtual reality-based ceiling crane simulator.

A training evaluation apparatus of a ceiling crane simulator according to the present invention is a training system using a simulator in which a trainee can move a heavy object displayed on a screen using a lever, An apparatus for evaluating a training of a trainer, comprising: a plurality of training result information and weight position information for each evaluation interval set at the time of training of a ceiling crane in the simulator, from the simulator, A training evaluation data acquisition unit accumulating and accumulating position information; The training result data of the entire evaluation period compiled by the training evaluation data obtaining unit is scored as a predefined evaluation item, a score, and an evaluation standard for each evaluation interval to derive an evaluation result, An acquisition data operation unit for storing the accumulated weighted object position data in the performance management database; And an output unit for providing the result of the evaluation and the evaluation to the trainee and the evaluator.

When the training evaluation apparatus of the present invention as proposed is applied to a virtual reality-based ceiling crane training simulator, it is possible to determine whether training is lacking in the training process of the trainee, and whether a score difference or disqualification It is possible to easily confirm whether or not the image has been displayed.

Further, through the training evaluation apparatus of the present invention, it is possible to know which part of the trainee needs to be supplemented. In the case of the lecturer, it is possible to easily check the training process and results of the trainee by simple operation after checking the training process of the trainee without checking the training course of the trainee individually, and it is possible to judge whether the actual ceiling crane driving training is suitable / It helps to manage training performance.

In addition to this, it is possible to maximize the effectiveness of ceiling crane training for beginners in industrial field training centers and vocational education schools, as well as to save the time and cost of training evaluation in the position of the instructor. Also, there is an advantage that it is possible to check the objective and quantitative training results by training in the safe training environment in the initial training where the safety accident frequency is high.

1 is a view showing an example of a practical test course of a ceiling crane driver's driving skill to be trained by using the training evaluation apparatus of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a driving sequence of a practical test course for a ceiling crane driving operator according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a diagram showing the arrangement of the obstacles in the practical test course of the ceiling crane driving operator according to the present embodiment.
Fig. 4 is a view showing an obstacle and a heavy object of a practical test course of a ceiling crane driver according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a view showing a section of a practical skill test of a ceiling crane driving skill classified according to the present embodiment.
6 is a view showing a configuration of a training evaluation apparatus of a ceiling crane simulator of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a view showing evaluation items of the ceiling crane training according to the present embodiment and evaluation criteria thereof.
FIG. 8 is a view showing a reason for disqualification of ceiling crane training applied to the present embodiment and an application period.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing bypass obstacle avoidance among training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment. FIG.
FIG. 10 is a view showing a wall obstacle detour during disciplinary disqualification according to the present embodiment. FIG.
11 is a view showing the drum overheating during the training disqualification according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 12 is a view showing an overtravel obstacle over travel screen in the disqualification disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.
Fig. 13 is a view showing a course out-of-range area in the training disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 14 is a view showing a screen in which the golfer is over three meters or more in excess of the pole height during the disqualification reason according to the embodiment.
Fig. 15 is a screen when a heavy object touches the floor out of training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 16 is a screen when the specified time out of training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment is exceeded.
FIG. 17 is a view showing a case in which an obstacle is knocked down during discipline disqualification according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 18 is a view showing a case in which the drum obstacle is knocked down during the training disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 19 is a screen on which the drum obstacle is pushed during the disqualification disqualification according to the present embodiment.
20 is a view showing a direction in which the drum obstacle is passed according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 21 is a layout diagram of the whole normal collision collision object set for the training evaluation according to the present embodiment.
22 is a layout diagram of the jumping obstacle normal passing collision object set according to the present embodiment.
23 is a wall obstacle normal passing collision object layout set according to the present embodiment.
24 is a layout view of a drum obstacle normal passing collision object set according to the present embodiment.
25 is a pole obstacle normal passing collision object layout set according to the present embodiment.
26 is a line collision check collision object layout diagram of a running course set according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 27 is a view showing the collision check collision object of a course that is set according to the present embodiment.
FIG. 28 is a view showing the out-of-range check conflict object of the running course set according to the present embodiment.
FIGS. 29 and 30 show training evaluation results and training record sheets for trainees and evaluators according to the present embodiment. FIG.

Hereinafter, the present embodiment will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the scope of the inventive concept of the present embodiment can be determined from the matters disclosed in the present embodiment, and the spirit of the present invention possessed by the present embodiment is not limited to the embodiments in which addition, Variations.

The suffix "part" used in the description relating to the present invention is to be given or mixed with consideration only for ease of specification, and does not have a meaning or role that is different from itself.

The ceiling crane simulator used in the present embodiment is configured to be able to operate a lever for moving a heavy object on the same horizontal plane in front, back, left and right, and a lever for moving a heavy object up and down. It is a device for training evaluation of a trainee by using movement information of a heavy object manipulated by the user.

1 is a view showing an example of a practical test course of a ceiling crane driver's driving skill to be trained by using the training evaluation apparatus of the present invention.

The result of 3D modeling based on the qualification verification practical test course specification is shown in the ceiling crane driving professional driving company, and the embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail using a model test course.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a driving sequence of a practical test course for a ceiling crane driving operator according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As a running sequence of an actual ceiling crane driving technician practical skill test course, a desired training result can be achieved only by training in the numeric and arrow directions shown in Fig. 2 at the time of the simulator training. If training is performed in a manner inconsistent with the direction of the numbers and arrows shown in FIG. 2, an exception process is performed, and disqualification is performed due to an under-score.

Fig. 3 is a diagram showing the arrangement of the obstacles in the practical test course of the ceiling crane driving operator according to the present embodiment.

Actual ceiling crane driver The ability to arrange the obstacle types of the practical training course in accordance with the layout standard makes it possible to further enhance the evaluation efficiency of the simulator training.

Fig. 4 is a view showing an obstacle and a heavy object of a practical test course of a ceiling crane driver according to the present embodiment.

Actual Ceiling Crane Driving Functional Instructor Practical Test Course It is a result of 3D modeling based on the obstacle standard and texture mapping based on actual photograph.

FIG. 5 is a view showing a section of a practical skill test of a ceiling crane driving skill classified according to the present embodiment.

Based on the real ceiling crane driver 's practical skill test evaluation section, it was classified into 6 zones, and evaluation items and points were applied to each section. In addition, the points of the training start point 1 and the training end point 6 are classified into the same zone, and the points of the passing obstacle passing items are the same. However, in the case of starting the first section, .

6 is a view showing a configuration of a training evaluation apparatus of a ceiling crane simulator of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 6, an operation method of the training evaluation apparatus of the present embodiment will be described. First, when the virtual reality-based simulator training 110 starts, the simulator training apparatus, And transmits the evaluation data of the trainee to the training evaluation data acquisition unit 120 according to the score.

In this case, the evaluation data transmitted includes information on the evaluation section number, the evaluation item number, the score grade, and the evaluation reference number, and the order of the information includes the evaluation section number, the evaluation item number, Are included in the order of reference numbers. For example, if a forward run of two segments is hit by an obstacle and receives a grade of 2, the evaluation data for that training result is of the form (2,3,2,3).

The simulator training apparatus transfers the coordinate values (x, y, z) of the position information of the heavy object to the training evaluation data acquisition unit 120 for each frame separately from the training results.

The training evaluation data acquiring unit 120 accumulates the weighted position information and outputs the training result information to the acquisition data calculator 130 together with the all-interval training result data, .

The acquisition data operation unit 130 performs scoring according to the evaluation items and the scoring criteria defined for each section with respect to the training result data of all the sections transmitted from the training evaluation data acquisition unit 120. [ The scored result is transmitted to the training sheet output unit 150 at the end of the training, and is output to the screen of the training sheet output unit 150. The scored result is stored in the performance management database 140 together with the weight information. The heavy object position information can be used as interval recording output data in the training recording sheet for the evaluator after training.

FIG. 7 is a view showing evaluation items of the ceiling crane training according to the present embodiment and evaluation criteria thereof.

The acquired data operation unit 130 constituting the training evaluation apparatus of the present invention scores the training results based on the training evaluation item, the score, and the evaluation reference information illustrated in FIG. The evaluation item 11 exemplified in Fig. 7 is an item only available in an actual ceiling crane, and 10 points are basically given in the qualification verification practical test, so that the basic ten points are also given to the training evaluation device of the present invention. If there is no reason for disqualification, if the score is 60 or more, the training is successful. If the score is less than 60, the training is failed.

FIG. 8 is a view showing a reason for disqualification of ceiling crane training applied to the present embodiment and an application period.

The ceiling crane driving qualification verification qualification test At the practical test, the score is scored using the evaluation items, rating, and evaluation criteria shown in FIG. 7, but disqualification is disqualified regardless of the scoring result.

The illustrated information in FIG. 8 is the Disqualification Reason and Applicable Period of the Ceiling Crane Driving Function Qualification Verification Practical Test, and this information also applies to the training evaluation device of the present invention.

The reason why the same content among the evaluation criteria of FIG. 7 and the disqualification reason of FIG. 8 is included is that some of the same contents are included in the evaluation criteria of FIG. 7 and the disqualification reason of FIG. 8 because the reason for disqualification is output during the training . For example, if there was no reason for the deduction in the first section and there was no reason for the deduction in the other section, the result of the scoring corresponds to the training success of 90 points. However, because the disqualification occurred in the first section, , And the disqualification reason is displayed on the screen.

9 to 30, a training process using a training simulator based on a virtual reality and an evaluation method for training according to the present invention will be described in detail.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing bypass obstacle avoidance among training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment. FIG.

Referring to Fig. 9, the illustrated arrows indicate the direction of bypassing the left side of the pendulous obstacle, and the bypass to the pendulous obstacle includes bypassing the right side of the pendulous obstacle, which is the downward direction of the arrow end. It is evaluated that it has bypassed the obstacle and passed the obstacle again.

FIG. 10 is a view showing a wall obstacle detour during disciplinary disqualification according to the present embodiment. FIG.

Referring to Fig. 10, the illustrated arrows indicate the direction of bypassing the right side of the wall obstacle, and the wall obstacle bypass includes bypassing the left side of the wall obstacle, which is the lower direction of the arrow end. As in the case of the training for the jumping obstacle shown in Fig. 9, it is evaluated that the obstacle is bypassed after passing through the wall obstacle and then returned when the obstacle is normally passed.

Fig. 11 is a view showing drums of over drums height during training disqualification according to the present embodiment. Fig.

The drums were 3D modeled at a height of 1m and were used based on the specifications of the ceiling crane driving technician qualification verification practical test obstacle standard. Driving beyond the height of the drum when passing through the turning point will cause disqualification. After exceeding the height of the drum by more than 1 m, it is evaluated that the drum height has exceeded the drum height even though it has passed through the drum.

The excess of the drum height is calculated by the following equation (1).

In operation of the hoisting lever, the height of the heavy object is calculated in real time by the equation of Equation (1), and when the trainer stops operating the hoisting lever, the height of the object at that time is stored as the current height information.

FIG. 12 is a view showing an overtravel obstacle over travel screen in the disqualification disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 12, the overhang obstacle is modeled at a height of 1.8 m, and the pole height at the middle is 1 m. The obstacle was also modeled based on the specification of the ceiling crane driver 's driving qualification verification practical test obstacle standard.

If the passenger passes the obstacle height of 1.8m, it corresponds to the reason for disqualification, and after exceeding the obstacle height of 1.8m, it is evaluated that the passenger ran over the obstacle height even if it passed the normal pass. The exceeding obstacle height overrun is calculated by the above equation (1).

Fig. 13 is a view showing a course out-of-range area in the training disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.

Ceiling Crane Driving Functional Qualification Verification If the weight of the heavy object deviates from the center line of the course by 2.5m outside the course, it becomes disqualification reason. The black solid line shown in FIG. 13 represents a point 2.5 m outside the course center line, and if a part of the heavy object is passed over, it is disqualified.

FIG. 14 is a view showing a screen in which the golfer is over three meters or more in excess of the pole height during the disqualification reason according to the embodiment.

Referring to FIG. 14, the pole obstacle is modeled at a height of 1 m, and the ceiling crane driving operator qualification verification practical test test obstacle standard is used as a standard. Qualification Verification In practice test, if you run more than 3m in excess of pole height, you will be disqualified.

The traveling time of the pole height exceeding 3 m is calculated by the following Equation 2 and Equation 3 from the point of time when the height exceeds 1 m in height as in the case of Equation 1 above.

If the calculation result of the travel distance according to Equation (2) is 0, the acquired data calculation unit 130 of the present invention calculates the distance traveled by the traversing distance value in real time, The obtained data calculation unit 130 of the present invention calculates the distance moved to the mileage value in real time.

If both the driving distance and the traverse distance are not zero, the vehicle moves in the diagonal direction. Therefore, the distance traveled in the diagonal direction is calculated in real time using the calculation results of the traveling distance and the traverse distance.

The height of the heavy object can be calculated by Equation (4) below.

When the lever is operated during the calculation of the distance over which the weight moves in real time, the height of the weight calculated by Equation (4) is calculated in real time. Then, the height of the weight at the time when the lever operation is stopped is stored as the current weight information.

Fig. 15 is a screen when a heavy object touches the floor out of training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment.

Ceiling Crane Driving Function Qualification Verification In the practical test, when the weight touches the floor, it becomes the reason for disqualification. However, if the car is hoisted less than 20cm from the starting point and put it on the floor again, do.

FIG. 16 is a screen when the specified time out of training disqualification reasons according to the present embodiment is exceeded.

For example, a ceiling crane driver's qualification verification practical test should be completed within 7 minutes and return to the course. In the simulator training, the training can be continued even if the prescribed time exceeds 7 minutes, but the evaluation of the training is disqualified.

FIG. 17 is a view showing a case in which an obstacle is knocked down during discipline disqualification according to the present embodiment.

Ceiling Crane Driving Function Qualification Verification Failure to score 5 points, including a roundabout, during a practical test will result in disqualification regardless of the section. However, if one pole falls and another pole falls, it is treated as one.

In the simulator, the fallen pole is automatically programmed so that the fallen pole is automatically set up. Once the fallen pole is reloaded, it is reflected in the evaluation.

FIG. 18 is a view showing a case in which the drum obstacle is knocked down during the training disqualification reason according to the present embodiment.

Ceiling Crane Driving Functional Qualification Verification During the practical test, if you hit the drum with heavy weight while passing through the turning point, you will be disqualified. The collision between the falling drum and the heavy object is excluded from the evaluation.

FIG. 19 is a screen on which the drum obstacle is pushed during the disqualification disqualification according to the present embodiment.

Ceiling Crane Driving Function Qualification Verification During the practical test, if the drums are overweighted by 70cm or more when passing through the turning point, they will be disqualified. The pushing distance is calculated as the straight line distance from the center of the drum at the initial position to the center of the drum after movement.

20 is a view showing a direction in which the drum obstacle is passed according to the present embodiment.

Failure to return the drum, which is the turning point, at the time of the practical test of the ceiling crane driving qualification verification officer becomes disqualification reason. The arrows shown in Fig. 20 normally indicate the direction of passage through the drum, and the passage height should be within 1 m.

FIG. 21 is a layout diagram of the whole normal collision collision object set for the training evaluation according to the present embodiment.

The collision object has characteristics that are invisible on the training screen and is set in the shape of a rectangular parallelepiped to detect the detour, collision, and normal passage of the obstacle, wall obstacle, pole obstacle, and drum obstacle respectively.

22 is a layout diagram of the jumping obstacle normal passing collision object set according to the present embodiment.

The collision obstacle collision object can be classified into two functions. The first is a collision object for checking whether the obstacle passes normally, as the numbers? To? Shown in FIG. Therefore, if a heavy object collides with the collision objects (1) through (3), it is judged as a normal passage.

The second one is the collision object for checking whether or not the obstacle is bypassed as the numerals 4 and 5 shown in Fig. If a heavy object passes by collision object ④ or ⑤, it is judged to be detouring, and when it passes beyond the range of collision object ④ or ⑤, it is judged to be out of course range of 2.5m and disqualified.

23 is a wall obstacle normal passing collision object layout set according to the present embodiment.

According to the present embodiment, a wall obstacle collision object can be classified into two functions.

The first is a collision object for checking whether or not a wall obstacle normally passes as the numbers ① to ③ shown in FIG. For example, if collision objects ① and ③ and heavy objects collide with each other, it is judged as normal passage.

The second is the collision object for checking whether it bypasses the wall obstacle as the numbers 4 and 5 shown in FIG. If a heavy object passes by collision object ④ or ⑤, it is judged that it is detouring, and if it passes beyond the range of collision object ④ or ⑤, it is judged that the course range is out of 2.5m and disqualified.

24 is a layout view of a drum obstacle normal passing collision object set according to the present embodiment.

According to the present embodiment, the drum obstacle collision object can be classified into two functions.

The first is the numbers ① to ④ shown in FIG. 24, and it is a collision object for checking whether or not the drum obstacle normally passes. When the collision objects ① to ④ and heavy objects collide sequentially, they are judged as normal passage. Therefore, if the heavy object is out of range of the collision objects ① to ④, it is judged that the course range is 2.5m away and disqualified.

The second one is the number ⑤ shown in FIG. 24, which is a collision object for checking whether a drum obstacle collides. When a heavy object collides with a colliding object ⑤, it is reflected in the training evaluation due to the drum collision.

25 is a pole obstacle normal passing collision object layout set according to the present embodiment.

Pole obstacles are the most frequently deployed obstacles to the Ceiling Crane Driving Course Qualification Verification Practical Test Course. If a collision object of a pole obstacle is set to five collision objects on one obstacle like a collision object of another obstacle, the number of collision objects may become too large, which may degrade the simulation performance. Therefore, in the present invention, only one collision object is set in the course range departure area except for one of the 23 pole obstacles overlapping the 2 section and the 5 section, and it is determined whether the collision object is passed or bypassed.

For the pole obstacle overlapping the 2 and 5 sections, two collision objects are set and each interval training evaluation is performed. The method of checking passage and detour can be performed by a method of comparing the collision object of the current passing pole obstacle with the colliding object of the next colliding pole obstacle object, After the collision with the next collision object, there may be a penalty, but it has passed the pole obstacle.

Confirmation of the collision object placement shown in FIG. 25 confirms that the current collision object and the next collision object must collide unconditionally in order to pass the poll obstacle. Since the collision object of the overlapping pole obstacle in the 2 and 5 sections is activated only for the corresponding section evaluation, it does not affect the other collision check.

Such a pole obstacle bypass can be classified into two situations. The first situation is when the collision object of the passing pole obstacle collides with the next collision object without colliding with the next collision object after the collision with the heavy object. In the second situation, contrary to the first situation, the collision object of the current passing pole obstacle collides with the next collision object without colliding with the heavy object. Confirmation of collision object placement in FIG. 25 can be used to understand the two situations of the pole obstacle bypass.

26 is a line collision check collision object layout diagram of a running course set according to the present embodiment.

As described above with reference to Fig. 7, it can be confirmed that the weight of the weight-based evaluation criterion is reduced when it touches the line of the running course. A collision object can be set as shown in FIG. 26 to check whether or not a heavy object touches the line of the running course. The checking method is evaluated as a bit bite if the weight of the heavy object is out of the collision object.

FIG. 27 is a view showing the collision check collision object of a course that is set according to the present embodiment.

As described above with reference to Fig. 7, it can be confirmed that a weight is scored when the weight exceeds the line of the running course among the evaluation criteria for each section. A situation in which a heavy object has crossed a line of the running course is called a course deviation, and a collision object can be set as shown in FIG. 27 to check the course deviation. The check method is evaluated as a deviation from the course when a heavy object completely leaves the collision object. It can be said that the situation is similar to the pole obstacle bypass in Fig. 25, but the space between the pole and the pole obstacle is evaluated as a deviation from the course and the pole obstacle is evaluated as a detour.

FIG. 28 is a view showing the out-of-range check conflict object of the running course set according to the present embodiment.

A collision object was set at 2.5 m outside the center line of the qualification verification test course shown in FIG. 13 as shown in FIG. If a rectangular section marked for each section crosses even a part of the weight, it is evaluated as disqualified.

FIGS. 29 and 30 show training evaluation results and training record sheets for trainees and evaluators according to the present embodiment. FIG.

Using the above scheme, finally, the score of the training record sheet for the trainee and the evaluator is outputted in the form of a report so that the trainee or the evaluator can easily check the score shown in FIG. 7 to FIG. FIG. 29 is a screen of a training evaluation result outputted to a trainee after completion of training, and is scored as a score based on a score of each segment, and is output as a score, and it is possible to confirm whether the training result is success or failure. As described with reference to Fig. 8, when the score is 60 or more, it is accepted, but if disqualification occurs, the training result is outputted as failure.

Also, the name of the trainee, the name of the trainee course, the driving time, the driving distance, the number of the pole obstacle conduction, the number of course departure times, the obstacle avoidance number, the range deviation number, the wall obstacle conduction number, List the reasons and check the box where applicable.

30 shows the training record sheet for the evaluator, and the interval record is additionally output to the tracing person recording sheet. The section records the driving trajectory based on the position data of the heavy object that has traveled the course, and outputs the score and the required time for each evaluation item. The trainer or evaluator can see what the obstacles are, what are the frequent mistakes, and what are the frequent disqualifications for the trainer.

Claims (7)

A training system using a simulator capable of moving a weight displayed on a screen using a lever by a trainer, the apparatus being capable of evaluating a trainee's training using information that a trainee has moved a weight in the simulator,
Acquiring training result information for each of the evaluation sections and heavy object position information set in advance at the time of ceiling crane training in the simulator from the simulator and acquiring training evaluation data for accumulating the training result data and the heavy object position information of the entire evaluation section part;
The training result data of the entire evaluation period compiled by the training evaluation data obtaining unit is scored as a predefined evaluation item, a score, and an evaluation standard for each evaluation interval to derive an evaluation result, An acquisition data operation unit for storing the accumulated weighted object position data in the performance management database; And
And an output unit for providing the result of the estimation and the evaluation to the trainee and the evaluator. The method according to claim 1,
Wherein the training evaluation data obtaining section receives from the simulator the training result data for each of the evaluation sections,
Wherein the training result data includes information on a number of the evaluation section, an evaluation item number, a score grade, and an evaluation reference number sequentially. 3. The method of claim 2,
Wherein the acquisition data operation unit calculates the score of the training result of the trainee based on the evaluation item and the score for each evaluation interval and the evaluation criteria and provides the score at the end of the training. The method of claim 3,
Wherein the pre-stored evaluation item includes disqualification grounds for judging that the training is unsuccessful,
The disqualification includes at least one of the following items: an obstacle avoidance item, a wall obstacle avoidance item, a drum height overrunning item, a course range deviation item, a pole height overrunning item, a weighted ground contact item,
The simulator displays a 3D rendered image of the pivoting obstacle, the wall obstacle, the drum, the course and the pole together with the weight,
Wherein the acquisition data operation unit displays the training failure information through the output unit when the score of the trainee exceeds a preset reference score, Training evaluation device. 5. The method of claim 4,
The above-mentioned course out-of-range item indicates a case of departing from the predetermined range of 2.5 m, and the above-mentioned pole height over-travel item Indicates a case in which the vehicle runs more than 3 meters in excess of the preset 1 m, and the predetermined timeout item indicates a predetermined time exceeding 7 minutes. 5. The method of claim 4,
Wherein the disqualification includes a case in which the drum obstacle is pushed by a predetermined distance of 70 cm or more, a case in which the drum obstacle has fallen, and a case in which the drum obstacle does not return. The method of claim 3,
Wherein the obtained data operation unit uses the collision object configured for each evaluation period without being displayed through the simulator in order to determine whether the heavy object is bypassing and passing through the obstacle, Training evaluation device of ceiling crane simulator.

Images