KR20170072403A - System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method - Google Patents

System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20170072403A
KR20170072403A KR1020150180137A KR20150180137A KR20170072403A KR 20170072403 A KR20170072403 A KR 20170072403A KR 1020150180137 A KR1020150180137 A KR 1020150180137A KR 20150180137 A KR20150180137 A KR 20150180137A KR 20170072403 A KR20170072403 A KR 20170072403A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
data
analysis
equipment
emission
unit
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020150180137A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR101757677B1 (en
Inventor
우해은
강희태
박종호
김태헌
최승환
고은경
류명선
김성조
Original Assignee
한국환경공단
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 한국환경공단 filed Critical 한국환경공단
Priority to KR1020150180137A priority Critical patent/KR101757677B1/en
Publication of KR20170072403A publication Critical patent/KR20170072403A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR101757677B1 publication Critical patent/KR101757677B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/26Government or public services
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K17/00Methods or arrangements for effecting co-operative working between equipments covered by two or more of main groups G06K1/00 - G06K15/00, e.g. automatic card files incorporating conveying and reading operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services

Abstract

The present invention relates to a food garbage management system using a geographical information system capable of effectively analyzing and managing data for maintaining food waste and data for reducing food garbage, a method therefor, and a computer recorded with the method A readable recording medium is disclosed. A food garbage management system using the geographic information system of the present invention includes: a communication unit for receiving emission information per unit and equipment information per unit; An emission data base for storing emission data; An equipment data base for storing equipment data; A region-based data management unit for storing map data, matching the map data with the emission data and the related area of the equipment data, and storing the matching result as area-based data; A user interface unit for providing an interface for selection of an analysis target and analysis criteria and providing an interface for displaying an analysis result; And updating the emission data and the equipment data by using the emission amount information per unit and the equipment information per unit inputted through the communication unit, and using the analysis object selected through the user interface unit and the analysis standard, And an analysis management unit for analyzing the data and outputting the analyzed result to the user interface unit as the analysis result.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a food waste management system using a geographical information system, a method for the same, and a computer-readable recording medium on which the method is recorded.

The present invention relates to a food waste management system using a geographic information system, a method therefor, and a computer-readable recording medium on which the method is recorded. More particularly, the present invention relates to a food waste management system, The present invention relates to a food waste management system using a geographical information system capable of effectively analyzing and managing data to be maintained, a method therefor, and a computer readable recording medium on which the method is recorded.

Currently, there is a need to reduce the amount of food waste generated in accordance with the London Convention, which completely prohibits the discharge of waste water from the sea into the ocean from January 2013.

Domestic food waste has been steadily increasing due to the nature of its unique food culture and processing environment. This increase has led to an increase in the cost of treating food waste, which is expected to further increase in the future due to the disposal of landfill waste and disposal of wastewater due to the prohibition of marine dumping of drinking water by the London Convention.

As a result, RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) -based system, sticker payment chip system, and dedicated envelope system have been proposed as a method for reducing food waste, but an RFID-based system capable of weighing food waste and managing information thereof is recommended .

However, in the case of the above-mentioned conventional system, it is possible to grasp the emission status of food waste by each emitter. However, since it is not possible to provide a guide for managing emission by using such data, it is difficult to suppress the generation of food waste per emission source .

Published Patent Application No. 10-2011-0092401 (published on Aug. 18, 2011)

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to solve the problems of the prior art described above by analyzing data on the amount of discharged food waste and equipment on a geographical basis to derive evaluation data for each region and equipment and to easily identify the derived data A food waste management system using a geographic information system which is easy to maintain equipment for reducing food waste and processing food waste by displaying in one way, a method therefor, and a computer readable recording medium on which the method is recorded have.

In order to achieve the above object, a food waste management system using a geographic information system according to the present invention is a system for managing food waste using a geographic information system, the system comprising: a communication unit for receiving emission information for each household and equipment information for each complex; An emission data base for storing emission data; An equipment data base for storing equipment data; A region-based data management unit for storing map data, matching the map data with the emission data and the related area of the equipment data, and storing the matching result as area-based data; A user interface unit for providing an interface for selection of an analysis target and analysis criteria and providing an interface for displaying an analysis result; And updating the emission data and the equipment data by using the emission amount information for each household and the equipment information for each household inputted through the communication unit and transmitting the emission amount data and the equipment data through the user interface unit, Based data and outputting the analyzed result to the user interface unit as the analysis result.

Here, the user interface unit may provide an interface for selecting a region and an interface for selecting a reference time as a detailed selection item of the analysis target, and may include an interface for selecting an analysis item and a selection of an analysis condition as detailed selection items of the analysis criteria Wherein the analysis management unit receives the region selection, the reference date selection, the analysis item selection, and the analysis condition selection through the user interface unit and analyzes the region-based data according to the input selection value And the regional evaluation result can be generated as the analysis result.

In addition, the regional evaluation result may be a grade determined in proportion to the amount of emission among the generation amount of the generation and a weight reduction promotion target selected according to the grade.

On the other hand, the analysis result may indicate whether the grade or the weight loss promotion object is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.

In addition, the regional evaluation results include the weight loss rate determined by substituting the monthly emission amount and the previous month emission amount among the emission amount information per generation into the following equation (1)

[Equation 1]

Figure pat00001

 And may be a weight reduction acceleration object selected in a reverse order of magnitude of the weight reduction rate.

In addition, the regional evaluation results are as follows: emission variation of the household per unit of 3 months, average emission per household, emission variation of the household per 3 months, average generation per household, and average emission per household per 3 months And the size of the emission information-based index proportional to the sum of the emission deviations of the households.

On the other hand, the analysis result may indicate whether the weight loss rate or the weight loss promotion object is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.

In addition, the analysis result may be one in which the operation rate is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.

On the other hand, the regional evaluation result may be an equipment rating that reflects errors in the identification information of the food waste exporter collected from the food waste collection equipment through the communication unit.

Also, the equipment class is determined by reflecting a ranking according to the error index calculated by reflecting the type and frequency of occurrence of the error with respect to the identification information, and the type of the error is classified into a tag An error and a time error which is an error relating to the collection time of the identification information.

On the other hand, the analysis result may be that the equipment rating is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a geographic information system that reads a tag for identifying an ejector, receives information from a plurality of food waste collection equipment for measuring ejection time, The method comprising the steps of: calculating a tag error and a time error occurrence count for each device;

Figure pat00002
Calculating a tag error occurrence index according to the recognition;
Figure pat00003
Calculating a time error occurrence index according to the recognition;
Figure pat00004
Calculating a total occurrence index according to the recognition; Calculating a ranking in descending order of the total occurrence index; Ranking the calculated rankings and assigning markers having different colors to the rankings; And displaying the marker on the map data by the geographic information system.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable recording medium storing a method of managing garbage using a geographic information system.

The present invention has the effect of providing a reduction instruction for food waste by displaying geographically based data on the amount of discharged waste of food waste and deriving evaluation data for each region and displaying the derived data in an easy-to-identify manner.

In addition, by analyzing data on food waste disposal equipment by geographical basis, it is possible to derive evaluation data for each equipment and display the derived data in an easy-to-identify manner to facilitate maintenance and repair of food waste disposal equipment It has the effect of providing guidance.

1 is a diagram illustrating a system for managing garbage using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a view showing an example of a screen displayed by the user interface unit of the food waste management system using the geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a view illustrating another example of a screen displayed by the user interface unit of the food waste management system using the geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is a flowchart illustrating a method of managing garbage using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is a view for explaining the operation of the individual weighing equipment of the food waste management system using the geographic information system according to the embodiment of the present invention.

The description of the disclosed technique is merely an example for structural or functional explanation and the scope of the disclosed technology should not be construed as being limited by the embodiments described in the text. That is, the embodiments are to be construed as being variously embodied and having various forms, so that the scope of the disclosed technology should be understood to include equivalents capable of realizing technical ideas.

Meanwhile, the meaning of the terms described in the present application should be understood as follows.

The terms " first ", " second ", and the like are used to distinguish one element from another and should not be limited by these terms. For example, the first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as a first component.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected to the other element, but there may be other elements in between. On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between. On the other hand, other expressions that describe the relationship between components, such as "between" and "between" or "neighboring to" and "directly adjacent to" should be interpreted as well.

It is to be understood that the singular " include " or "have" are to be construed as including the stated feature, number, step, operation, It is to be understood that the combination is intended to specify that it is present and not to preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, numbers, steps, operations, components, parts or combinations thereof.

Each step may take place differently from the stated order unless explicitly stated in a specific order in the context. That is, each step may occur in the same order as described, may be performed substantially concurrently, or may be performed in reverse order.

All terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed technology belongs, unless otherwise defined. Terms defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted to be consistent with meaning in the context of the relevant art and can not be construed as having ideal or overly formal meaning unless expressly defined in the present application.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a system for managing food waste using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. A food waste management system using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a communication unit 100, an emission data base unit 200, an equipment data base unit 300, An area-based data management unit 400, a user interface unit 500, and an analysis management unit 600.

The communication unit 100 receives emission amount information and individual equipment information for each household from the individual weighing equipment 10 and outputs the received information to the analysis management unit 600. Here, the communication unit 100 may be a wired or wireless communication. However, when wireless communication is used as shown in Fig. 1, the wireless communication module, for example, A code division multiple access (CDMA) module and receives information directly from the communication unit 100, or a terminal (not shown) having a wireless communication module reads the weighing values of the individual weighing equipment 10 The collected information can be received.

At this time, the individual weighing apparatus 10 is configured such that a food waste can be stored in the RFID collecting base unit 12 using an RFID system, a basket is installed in the inlet, and a load cell It is possible to measure the amount of discharge into the basket by mounting the RFID individual measuring unit 11 as an electronic balance.

First, the RFID individual measuring unit 11 receives the information stored in the RFID tag of the emission source, recognizes the emission source and the payment means, drives the opening and closing of the food waste charging port of the RFID collecting base unit 12, It is possible to measure the weight of the food garbage and transmit the food garbage collection data including the measurement data to the communication unit 100. [ Here, the source can carry postpaid or prepaid cards with RFID tag functionality.

In addition, the RFID collecting base 12 is a container for collecting garbage, and a unique number such as a collection container identification code is stored, and an RFID tag, which is a source recognition means and means for using RFID mounting equipment, may be mounted.

On the other hand, when there is no transmission function in the RFID individual metering section 11, the RFID tag reader section 700 of the emission source is used to extract the collection container identification code and the tag information from the RFID tag mounted on the RFID collection base section 12 And stores the collection information such as the capacity information of the RFID collection base 12, collection date and time, and the garbage collection data including the collection information to the communication unit 100.

The emission data base unit 200 stores the emission amount data and provides the emission amount data stored under the control of the analysis management unit 600 to the analysis management unit 600. By the control of the area based data management unit 400, The stored emission amount data may be provided to the area-based data management unit 400, the new emission amount data may be input from the analysis management unit 600, and the previously stored emission amount data may be updated and stored according to the input new emission amount data.

At this time, the emission data may be data obtained by converting the weight of the food waste into Kg, and it is preferable that data to which a different identifier is added for each star and equipment to match the map data stored in the area-based data management unit 400 .

The equipment database unit 300 stores the equipment data and provides the equipment data stored under the control of the analysis management unit 600 to the analysis management unit 600 and controls the equipment management unit 600 under the control of the area- The stored device data may be provided to the area-based data management unit 400, the new device data may be input from the analysis management unit 600, and the previously stored stored data may be updated and stored according to the input new device data.

In this case, the equipment data may be data indicating whether the equipment is in operation or not, and it is preferable that the equipment data is data obtained by adding different identifiers for each star and equipment in order to match the map data stored in the area-based data management unit 400.

The area-based data management unit 400 stores the map data, receives the emission amount data from the emission amount database unit 200, receives the equipment data from the equipment data base unit 300, Based on the input data of the equipment data, stores the matching result as area-based data, and outputs the stored area-based data to the analysis management unit 600 under the control of the analysis management unit 600 .

At this time, since the map data is provided as data displayed in the map area of the user interface unit 500, it is preferable that both the general map and the aerial photograph data are included for the convenience of the user. In particular, the map data may be GIS-based data for use in a geographic information system (GIS). Here, the GIS-based data is divided into spatial data and attribute data. The spatial data includes a topological relationship such as connectivity, contiguity, and adjacency, , Neural computing of spatial information, spatial correlation analysis, and network analysis.

Meanwhile, the user interface unit 500 provides an interface for selecting an analysis target and analysis criteria, and provides an interface for displaying analysis results. Here, it is preferable that the user interface unit 500 can support a GUI (Graphical User Interface). The GUI may be provided to be displayed on an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), an LED (Light Emitting Diode) .

At this time, the user interface unit 500 provides an interface for selecting a region and an interface for selecting a reference time as a detailed selection item to be analyzed, and provides an interface for selecting an analysis item and an analysis condition selection And detailed specific selection items will be described later.

The analysis management unit 600 analyzes the emission amount data stored in the emission amount database unit 200 and the emission amount data stored in the equipment data base unit 300 using the emission amount information for each household and the equipment information for each complex inputted through the communication unit 100 Analyzes the area-based data using the analysis object and analysis criterion selected through the user interface unit 500, and outputs the analyzed result to the user interface unit 500 as an analysis result.

At this time, the analysis management unit 600 receives the region selection, the reference date selection, the analysis item selection, and the analysis condition selection through the user interface unit 500, analyzes the area-based data according to the inputted selection value, Can be generated as an analysis result, and specific regional evaluation results will be described later.

FIG. 2 is a view showing an example of a screen displayed by the user interface unit 500 of the system for managing garbage using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, The operation of the food waste management system using the geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described.

The user interface unit 500 divides a screen of a predetermined display means into a menu selection region 510, an analysis target selection region 520, an analysis reference selection region 530, a map expression region 540, A tool selection area 550, a list-type display area 560, and a graphical display area 570 can be provided.

At this time, the menu selection area 510 includes a comprehensive status selection means for comprehensively browsing the evaluation results of the regions generated as a result of analyzing the area-based data in the analysis management unit 600, The emission management selection means capable of viewing the emission status and the like, and the equipment capable of viewing the equipment status among the regional evaluation results generated by analyzing the area-based data in the analysis management unit 600 Management selection means.

On the other hand, an area 520 for selection of an analysis object includes an interface for inputting and selecting a city, a city, a county, a city, a town, a village, , And can provide various input interfaces for selecting analysis targets such as reference year, month, and equipment.

In addition, the area 530 for selecting an analysis criterion may be provided with an interface for selecting an analysis item and an interface for selecting an analysis condition, and the selection means may be displayed in a multi-step selection manner.

On the other hand, the map display area 540 can display an evaluation result by region on a map, and can be displayed in a point expression according to the evaluation rating, or in the form of red, yellow and green icons May be displayed.

The tool selection area 550 is an interface for providing user convenience with respect to the display of the map display area 540. The tool selection area 550 allows the user to rotate the map in the map display area 540, Or a mode for displaying general map data and a mode for displaying aerial photograph data can be provided.

On the other hand, the list-type display area 560 can display the result of evaluation by region in a list format. For example, when the emission amount management means is selected in the menu selection area 510 and the emission status is selected as the analysis item, But are not limited to, the percentage of emissions per unit of output, per-unit output, per-unit average annual output, and per-unit output per unit of output relative to the national average per-unit output.

Also, the graphical display area 570 can display the result of evaluation by region in a graph format. For example, when the emission amount management means is selected in the menu selection region 510 and the emission status is selected as the analysis item, You can display a graph that compares the average regional and national average emissions for a period.

The operation of the food waste management system using the geographic information system according to one embodiment of the present invention in response to input and output through the user interface unit 500 will be described in detail as follows.

First, the analysis management unit 600 analyzes the amount of food waste discharged from the complexes in the administrative area selected as an analysis target from the emission database 200, when the emission status and the emission amount are selected as analysis items through the user interface unit 500 Data is provided.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 processes the received data to calculate the total amount of food waste discharged from the complexes in the administrative area, the total amount of food waste discharged per apartment, and the total amount of discharged food waste per apartment, Calculate the emissions, multiply the emissions per generation by the average emissions per nation, multiply by 100, and calculate the percent (%) as the result of the analysis.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list display area 560, and the graph display area 570, and the map display area 540 ), The emission per household is divided by the average emission per nation, multiplied by 100, and the value calculated for the comparative analysis as a percentage (%) is the red color marker for the top 20% nationwide, In the case of a green marker, the rest can be displayed using an orange marker, thereby increasing the visibility of the analysis result.

Here, the analysis management unit 600 may store the data calculated in correspondence with the emission status and the emission amount in the emission amount database unit 200.

On the other hand, when the weight loss status and the weight loss rate are selected as the analysis items through the user interface unit 500, the analysis management unit 600 analyzes the amount of food waste Are provided.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 processes the provided data to calculate the amount of food waste discharged per household of the previous month in the administrative area, the amount of food waste discharged per household per month of the same month in the administrative area, And the emission amount of the current month, the weight loss rate is calculated according to the following formula (1).

Figure pat00005

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can calculate a value obtained by subtracting the weight loss rate of the previous year from the weight loss rate calculated according to Equation (1) as an analysis result.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list display area 560, and the graph display area 570, and the map display area 540 ), A red marker when the weight loss rate calculated according to Equation (1) minus the weight loss rate of the previous year is the highest 20% of the nation, a green marker when the lower 30% of the national average, The visibility of the analysis result can be increased.

Here, the analysis management unit 600 may store the data calculated in accordance with the weight loss status and the weight loss rate in the emission database 200. [

In addition, when the operation management and the emission management are selected as the analysis items through the user interface unit 500, the analysis management unit 600 analyzes the amount of food waste discharged from the complexes in the administrative area selected as the analysis target from the emission database unit 200 Are provided.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 processes the supplied data to calculate the total amount of discharged food waste in the last three months, the total amount of discharged food waste in the last three months, and the amount of food waste The total emissions for the last three months are divided by the number of households, and the emissions for the last three months are calculated. The emissions for the last three months are divided by the emissions for the last three months per average household, multiplied by 100, It can be provided as an analysis result.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list display area 560, and the graph display area 570, and the map display area 540 ), The emission amount for the last three months per household is divided by the emission amount for the last three months per nation average household, multiplied by 100, and when the value calculated for the comparative analysis is in the upper 20% Color markers, green markers for the lower 30% of the country, and orange markers for the rest can be used to increase the visibility of the analysis results.

Here, the analysis management unit 600 may store the data calculated in correspondence with the operation management and the emission management in the emission database unit 200.

In addition, when the operation management and the weight loss management are selected as the analysis items through the user interface unit 500, the analysis management unit 600 analyzes the amount of food waste discharged from the complexes in the administrative area selected as the analysis target from the emission database 200 Are provided.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 processes the provided data to calculate the amount of food waste discharged per household of the previous month in the administrative area, the amount of food waste discharged per household per month of the same month in the administrative area, And the emission amount of the current month, the weight loss rate is calculated according to the above-mentioned formula (1). The analysis management unit 600 calculates the reduction rate of the previous month by substituting the emission amount of the previous month instead of the emission amount of the current month, the emission amount of the previous month instead of the emission amount of the previous month in Equation 1 described above, Instead of the amount of the current month, the amount of the previous month can be calculated by substituting the amount of the previous month for the previous month instead of the amount of the previous month.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can calculate, as an analysis result, a value obtained by subtracting the weight loss rate for the last three months from the weight loss rate for the last three months calculated according to Equation (1).

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list display area 560, and the graph display area 570, and the map display area 540 ), If the value obtained by subtracting the weight loss rate for the last three months from the weight loss rate for the last three months calculated according to Equation 1 is the highest 20% nationwide, the red marker is used, and if the lower 30% Green markers, and the rest can be displayed using orange markers to increase the visibility of the analysis results.

Here, the analysis management unit 600 may store the data calculated in correspondence with the operation management and the weight loss management in the emission database unit 200.

Meanwhile, when the operation management and the weight reduction promotion are selected as the analysis items through the user interface unit 500, the analysis management unit 600 may calculate the amount of food waste discharged from the complexes in the administrative area selected as the analysis target from the emission database unit 200 Are provided.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 processes the provided data to calculate the total amount of discharged food waste in each administrative complex, divides the total amount of discharged food waste by the number of households in the complex to calculate the amount of discharged per generation, It is also possible to provide the results of the analysis so that the emissions can be compared with the average emissions in the last three months per nation, the average emissions in the last three months per generation of the administrative area, and the average emissions during the last three months per household.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list-type display area 560, and the graphical display area 570, and calculate the calculated generation- The average emission amount for the last three months per generation of households, the average emission amount for the last three months per household of the administrative area, and the average emission amount for the last three months per household of the housing area. In case of the top 20% 1 grade, and the rest 2 grade is assigned and displayed, and in the case of grade 3, it can be decided to accelerate the weight loss. At this time, if the number of households in the complex is one or two households, the reliability of the analysis result can be improved by not calculating the grade.

Here, the analysis management unit 600 may store the data calculated in correspondence with the operation management and the weight loss promotion items in the emission database unit 200.

On the other hand, the analysis management unit 600 can use the emission information-based index as another form of the regional evaluation result of analyzing the amount of discharged garbage,

Figure pat00006
) Can be calculated by the following equation (2).

Figure pat00007

here,

Figure pat00008
Means the emission variance of the households in relation to the average emission per 3 months and 1 unit per nation,
Figure pat00009
Means the emission variation of the household per unit of households,
Figure pat00010
Is the emission variation of the corresponding household over the average emission per 3 months and 1 generation of each complex. This can be expressed by the following equation (3).

Also, k is a number assigned to a household, where n generations are present according to the above equation, and the emission information base index of the kth generation

Figure pat00011
Respectively.

On the other hand, the denominator of Equation (2)

Figure pat00012
The absolute value of the minimum value among the values of the first to nth generations
Figure pat00013
It means that the absolute value of the maximum value is added.

Figure pat00014

here,

Figure pat00015
,
Figure pat00016
And
Figure pat00017
Is a weight that can reflect the significance of the deviation of each unit. For the analysis of emissions, only units are more important than national units. For example, constant values of 0.05, 0.15 and 0.8 can be used. Meanwhile,
Figure pat00018
Means the monthly emission of the relevant household,
Figure pat00019
,
Figure pat00020
And
Figure pat00021
It is the average generation of emissions per unit for three months in each country, municipality, and complex.

The emission information-based indexes calculated as above can be selected in a descending order of the calculated results and can be adjusted to have a maximum value of 100 and a minimum value of 0 for convenience of data processing.

When the equipment status is selected as an analysis item through the user interface unit 500, the analysis management unit 600 analyzes the individual garbage collecting weighing equipment for the food waste collection in the administrative area selected from the equipment database unit 300 10).

Next, the analysis management unit 600 processes the provided data to extract the number of registered equipments, the number of movable equipments and the number of unused equipments in each administrative complex, calculates the utilization rate by dividing the number of movable equipments into the number of registered equipments, The calculated utilization rate can be compared with the average utilization rate by administrative district and can be provided as an analysis result at the same time.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can display the calculated data through the map display area 540, the list display area 560, and the graph display area 570, and calculate the calculated operation rate nationwide In the case of the top 20% of the nation, it is classified as grade 3. In case of the lower 30% of the nation, it is classified as grade 1, and the rest is classified as grade 2. Thus,

3 is a diagram illustrating another example of a screen displayed by the user interface unit 500 of the system for managing garbage using the geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The interface unit 500 divides the screen of the predetermined display means and displays the menu selection region 510, the operation status region 581, the discharge status region 582, the loss status status region 583, the equipment status region 584 ) And a main list area 585. [

In this case, the menu selection area 510 may be provided with three means of comprehensive status, emission management, and equipment management. In the screen shown in FIG. 3, when the user selects the comprehensive status in the menu selection area 510, And may be a divided screen for collectively displaying the regional evaluation results generated as a result of analyzing the area-based data in the analysis management unit 600. [

First, the operation status area 581 is an overview display area in which the operation statuses of the local governments corresponding to the reference dates are displayed in a list and a map form, and includes a municipality name, a registered complex number, a registered household number, 3-month emissions (kg), and the weight loss rate (%) for the last 3 months.

In addition, the emission status area 582 graphically displays the ratio (%) of the average emission amount (kg) per household for the last three months, the average emission amount (kg) It can be displayed as a list expression.

On the other hand, the weight loss status area 583 is a value obtained by subtracting the average weight loss rate for each household from the average weight loss rate (%) for each household in the past three months, the average weight loss rate (% Graph and list expressions.

In addition, the equipment status area 584 displays graphically and listwise the operating rate (%) and the nationwide average operating rate (%) as the ratio of the number of registered equipments, the number of movable equipments, can do.

On the other hand, the main list area 585 is an area for displaying the target of the weight loss promotion measure and the equipment inspection target by using the analysis result of calculating the grade and standard score for each apartment in the analysis management unit 600.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an operation of a system for managing garbage collection using a geographic information system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIGS. 1 to 4, A description will now be made of a method for analyzing the status of the equipment failure and the objects to be inspected during the operation of the waste management system.

First, in the method of analyzing the status of the equipment failure and the method of analyzing the inspection object, the term " equipment " refers to an individual weighing apparatus 10 having a structure capable of storing food waste by opening the inlet by the contact of the RFID tag, As described above, an electronic balance having a load cell attached thereto is mounted on the upper part of the equipment, and the amount of food waste discharged into the equipment is measured, and the measured amount of discharged waste can be transmitted to the communication unit 100 through the communication unit installed therein .

Here, the important parameters used for analysis by the analysis management unit 600 to determine the equipment check target are tag error, time error, and no status information transmission.

First, the tag error includes the loss and deletion of the RFID tag, the non-registration, and the non-issuance. The tag error described above will be described in detail as follows.

That is, a household which is to discharge food waste by using the individual weighing device 10 for collecting food waste, receives the RFID tag, and transmits the tag information to the analysis management unit 600 through the user interface unit 500 or the communication unit 100 Is registered as the identification information of the food waste exporter. Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 stores the RFID tag information requested to be registered in the equipment database unit 300 and transmits the RFID tag information to the information management unit (not shown) in the individual weighing equipment 10 through the communication unit 100. [ And transmits the RFID tag information. Next, the individual weighing apparatus 10 can determine whether the RFID tag that the food waste discharge household makes contact with the individual weighing apparatus 10 by using the received RFID tag information. At this time, the individual weighing apparatus 10 can update the information stored therein by periodically receiving the information transmitted by the analysis management unit 600 through the communication unit 100 in order to determine whether or not an error exists.

Here, the loss and deletion error refers to a case where the RFID tag that the household waste generation household has requested to report or delete the RFID tag is recognized by the individual weighing device 10, and the unregistered error means that the RFID tag Means that the RFID tag is recognized in the individual weighing device 10 and the unreleased error means that the RFID tag not issued is recognized in the individual weighing device 10. [

On the other hand, the time error includes a delayed transmission error in which the difference between the registration time and the discharge time exceeds 24 hours, an error in the past time when the difference between the registration time and the discharge time exceeds 365 days, There is a time error.

In addition, the transmission of the status information during the tag error refers to the equipment in which the status information is not transmitted on a weekly or daily basis on the analysis day.

First, the analysis management unit 600 calculates the current number of tags and the number of previous tag errors and time errors using the data stored in the equipment database unit 300 and the area-based data management unit 400 (S100) . At this time, if the analysis period of the analysis management unit 600 is a weekly unit, the current week is the last week and the last week is the previous week. If the analysis period standard is the daily unit, the current day is the present day, . ≪ / RTI >

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 confirms whether or not status information for each equipment is not transmitted (S200).

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can calculate the total number of occurrences of each type of tag error and time error of the last time and the present time (S300). That is, the analysis management unit 600 calculates the sum of the number of occurrences of the loss and deletion errors, the unregistered errors, and the unreleased errors in the case of the tag error, and calculates the sum of the number of occurrences of the delayed transmission error, Can be calculated.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 calculates a tag error occurrence index according to the following equation (4) (S400). Here, the whole equipment may be a range of equipment included depending on the range set through the user interface unit 500, and the range may be all equipment in the whole country or all the equipment in the administrative area It may be all of my equipment.

Figure pat00022

For example, if the total number of equipment tag errors is 10, and the number of tag errors in a given individual weighing machine 10 is 5, the tag error occurrence index is 50 (= (5 × 100) / 10).

Next, the analysis management unit 600 calculates a time error occurrence index according to the following equation (5) (S500). Here, the whole equipment may be a range of equipment included depending on the range set through the user interface unit 500, and the range may be all equipment in the whole country or all the equipment in the administrative area It may be all of my equipment.

Figure pat00023

For example, when the total number of equipment time errors is 200, and the number of time errors of a given individual weighing machine 10 is 40, the time error occurrence index is 20 (= (40 / 200) x 100).

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 calculates the total occurrence index according to the following equation (6) (S600).

Figure pat00024

For example, the total occurrence index is 70, which is the sum of these two values when the tag error occurrence index is 50 and the time error occurrence index is 20.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 calculates the frequency and the hysteresis index (S700). The frequency and the hysteresis index are calculated based on the current time and the weight of the error occurrence of the previous individual weighing equipment 10, The method is as follows.

First, the previous occurrence indicates whether a tag error or a time error has occurred last time. If the tag error or time error occurred last time, it may be given 5 points, and if not, zero point may be given.

The occurrence rate of the current time indicates whether or not a tag error or a time error has occurred at this time. If the tag error or the time error has occurred at this time, 15 points can be given.

On the other hand, the occurrence rate of the current tag error indicates whether or not the tag error has occurred for the present time, and 5 points can be given when the tag error occurs at this time, and 0 point if the tag error has not occurred.

The simultaneous occurrence of the current tag and the time error indicates whether or not the tag error and the time error occurred simultaneously at this time. If the tag error and the time error occur simultaneously at this time, the value is 10 points. .

On the other hand, the current occurrence of the current and previous tag errors indicates whether or not the tag error has continuously occurred during the present and the last time. If the tag error continuously occurs during the present and last time, 25 points are displayed. .

In addition, the current occurrence of the current and previous time error indicates whether or not the time error has continuously occurred during the current session and the previous session. If the time error occurred last time and last time, it is 15 points. .

On the other hand, the current time and previous tag and time error persistency occurrence indicates whether or not the tag and time error have occurred simultaneously at the current and previous times, and when the tag and time error continuously occur at this time and last time, , And if it does not occur, 0 point can be given.

Whether or not the status information is not transmitted indicates whether or not status information untransfer has occurred. If no status information is transmitted, 5 points can be given. If no status information is transmitted, 0 point can be given.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 calculates an error index according to the following equation (7) (S800).

Figure pat00025

At this time, if there are only 5 points, which is the number of past status information, including the previous tag error, previous time error, current tag error, and current time error, the corresponding equipment can be excluded from the error index ranking calculation.

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 calculates the order of the equipment in the nationwide or the administrative area in the order of the highest error index (S900). At this time, the analysis management unit 600 may use the total occurrence index instead of the error index in ranking calculation.

Next, the analysis management unit 600 can classify the equipment grade into three grades when the calculated rank is 70% as above, one rank when the lower rank is 10%, and the remaining rank, (S1000). Here, the analysis management unit 600 may classify all equipments as one class for convenience, and classify the equipments as class 3 when there are more than ten equipments, for convenience, .

Thereafter, the analysis management unit 600 may convert the above classification result into marker display through the user interface unit 500 and display it on the map data (S1100). In this case, The second grade required is orange, and the first grade for action is gray, but not limited to this. At this time, the analysis management unit 600 can display the markers not only by the equipment but also by the complex. If there are only three grades in the complex, the marker is displayed in red color. If there is only the grade 2 in the complex, If there are equipments with different grades in the complex, they can be displayed in the highest grade color. For example, the analysis management unit 600 can display a complex with a red marker when all the grades 1 to 3 are present in the complex, and the orange marker when there are only the grades 1 and 2 in the complex. Can be displayed.

The method for managing garbage using the geographic information system according to the present invention can be implemented by a program and stored in a computer-readable recording medium (CD-ROM, RAM, ROM, floppy disk, hard disk, magneto-optical disk, etc.).

Although the disclosed method and apparatus have been described with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications and equivalent embodiments are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention. I will understand that. Accordingly, the true scope of protection of the disclosed technology should be determined by the appended claims.

100:
200: emission amount database part
300: equipment data base
400: area-based data management unit
500: user interface section
600:
700: RFID reader unit

Claims (14)

A food waste management system using a geographic information system for managing the amount of food waste discharged,
A communication unit for receiving generation amount-by-generation emission amount information and equipment-specific equipment information;
An emission data base for storing emission data;
An equipment data base for storing equipment data;
A region-based data management unit for storing map data, matching the map data with the emission data and the related area of the equipment data, and storing the matching result as area-based data;
A user interface unit for providing an interface for selection of an analysis target and analysis criteria and providing an interface for displaying an analysis result; And
Updating the emission data and the equipment data by using the emission amount information for each household and the equipment information for each household inputted through the communication unit and using the analysis object selected through the user interface unit and the analysis standard And analyzing the data, and outputting the analyzed result as the analysis result to the user interface unit.
The method according to claim 1,
The user interface unit provides an interface for selecting a region and an interface for selecting a reference time as a detailed selection item of the analysis target, and further includes an interface for selecting an analysis item and an interface Lt; / RTI >
Wherein the analysis management unit receives the region selection, the reference date selection, the analysis item selection, and the analysis condition selection through the user interface unit, analyzes the region-based data according to the input selection value, A food waste management system using geographic information system generated as an analysis result.
The method of claim 2,
Wherein the region-specific evaluation result is a grade determined in proportion to the amount of emission in the generation amount of the generation and a target of acceleration of weight reduction selected in accordance with the grade.
The method of claim 3,
Wherein the analysis result indicates whether the rating or the weight reduction promotion target is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.
The method of claim 2,
The regional evaluation results include a reduction rate determined by substituting the monthly emission amount and the previous month emission amount among the emission amount information per generation into the following equation (1)
[Equation 1]
Figure pat00026

And a target for acceleration of weight reduction selected in a reverse order of magnitude of the weight reduction rate.
The method of claim 5,
The regional evaluation results are as follows: the emission variation of the household per unit of 3 months, the average emission per household per unit of 3 months, the emission variation of the household per unit of 3 months, And the size of the emission information-based index proportional to the sum of the emission deviations of the food waste.
The method of claim 6,
Wherein the analysis result indicates that the weight loss rate or the weight loss promotion object is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.
The method of claim 2,
The result of the regional evaluation is a utilization rate of the number of movable equipment compared to the number of registered equipment in the complex equipment information.
The method of claim 8,
Wherein the analysis result indicates that the operation rate is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.
The method of claim 2,
The result of the regional evaluation is a system for managing garbage using a geographic information system that is an equipment grade that reflects an error of identification information of a garbage collector collected from a garbage collection device through the communication unit.
The method of claim 10,
The equipment class is determined by reflecting the rank according to the error index calculated by reflecting the type and occurrence frequency of the error with respect to the identification information,
Wherein the type of the error includes a tag error that is an error related to the reliability of the identification information and a time error that is an error related to the collection time of the identification information.
The method according to claim 10 or 11,
Wherein the analysis result indicates that the equipment class is indicated by a marker on the map data according to the related area.
A food waste management method using a geographic information system for reading a tag for identifying an exporter and receiving the information from a plurality of food waste collection equipment for measuring the discharge time and managing the amount of the waste,
Calculating tag error and time error occurrence count for each device;
Figure pat00027
Calculating a tag error occurrence index according to the recognition;
Figure pat00028
Calculating a time error occurrence index according to the recognition;
Figure pat00029
Calculating a total occurrence index according to the recognition;
Calculating a ranking in descending order of the total occurrence index;
Ranking the calculated rankings and assigning markers having different colors to the rankings; And
And displaying the marker on the map data by the geographic information system.
A computer-readable recording medium storing a program for executing a method of managing food waste using the geographic information system according to claim 13.
KR1020150180137A 2015-12-16 2015-12-16 System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method KR101757677B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020150180137A KR101757677B1 (en) 2015-12-16 2015-12-16 System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020150180137A KR101757677B1 (en) 2015-12-16 2015-12-16 System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20170072403A true KR20170072403A (en) 2017-06-27
KR101757677B1 KR101757677B1 (en) 2017-07-27

Family

ID=59427905

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020150180137A KR101757677B1 (en) 2015-12-16 2015-12-16 System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR101757677B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102031087B1 (en) * 2019-03-19 2019-10-11 주식회사 다누시스 Big Data-Based City Control System For Clean City Implementation
KR20210084183A (en) * 2019-12-26 2021-07-07 한국국토정보공사 Food waste management support apparatus and method

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101401037B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2014-05-29 유빈스 주식회사 System for managing food waste

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102031087B1 (en) * 2019-03-19 2019-10-11 주식회사 다누시스 Big Data-Based City Control System For Clean City Implementation
KR20210084183A (en) * 2019-12-26 2021-07-07 한국국토정보공사 Food waste management support apparatus and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101757677B1 (en) 2017-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Moghadam et al. Urban energy planning procedure for sustainable development in the built environment: A review of available spatial approaches
CN106327062A (en) Method for evaluating state of power distribution network equipment
US20160018835A1 (en) System and method for virtual energy assessment of facilities
CN109416531A (en) The different degree decision maker of abnormal data and the different degree determination method of abnormal data
CN108717676B (en) Multi-data fusion-based job and live space evaluation method and system under different scales
US20120220274A1 (en) Position information analysis device and position information analysis method
US8554788B2 (en) Apparatus and method for analyzing information about floating population
CN102436624A (en) Method for processing flow and standard of power-marketing site services on basis of handheld terminal
CN104657811B (en) For account health evaluating, risk identification and the method and system remedied
CN106503178B (en) Automatic method and device for evaluating land ecological quality
CN110458195A (en) A kind of abnormal data discriminating method based on the fusion of more criterions
CN109492858A (en) Employee performance prediction technique and device, equipment, medium based on machine learning
Wiik et al. A Norwegian zero emission neighbourhood (ZEN) definition and a ZEN key performance indicator (KPI) tool
CN104574141A (en) Service influence degree analysis method
CN109255524A (en) A kind of measuring equipment data analyzing evaluation method and system
KR101757677B1 (en) System for managing for food waste using geographic information system, method thereof and computer recordable medium storing the method
CN109542742A (en) Database server hardware health evaluating method based on expert model
JP5054427B2 (en) Biomass utilization plan support method, apparatus and program
KR20150102503A (en) System of providing recommendation menu of weather for increasing sales
CN115130046A (en) Transformer substation carbon emission calculation method, device and management system
KR20160074325A (en) Electricity Demand Index (EDI) Forecasting System with respect to Weather Condition Change
CN113628083A (en) Source-boundary-domain integrated TVOC (transient voltage on-chip) management and control cloud platform
Bougdira et al. An intelligent traceability system: Efficient tool for a supply chain sustainability
CN105844373A (en) Target business district strength evaluation system and method
CN107093018A (en) Communication engineering project information method for visualizing and device based on health model

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AMND Amendment
AMND Amendment
X701 Decision to grant (after re-examination)
GRNT Written decision to grant