KR20160144113A - Intellectual Property Analysis System - Google Patents
Intellectual Property Analysis System Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20160144113A KR20160144113A KR1020150080455A KR20150080455A KR20160144113A KR 20160144113 A KR20160144113 A KR 20160144113A KR 1020150080455 A KR1020150080455 A KR 1020150080455A KR 20150080455 A KR20150080455 A KR 20150080455A KR 20160144113 A KR20160144113 A KR 20160144113A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- technology
- information
- intellectual property
- product
- technical
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 97
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 64
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 25
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000306 component Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008358 core component Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000153 supplemental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002087 whitening effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
-
- G06F17/30—
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
The present invention relates to techniques for analyzing intellectual property rights.
As the importance of intellectual property rights becomes more important, more and more individuals or organizations are in the process of securing intellectual property rights. Further, there is provided a system for providing intellectual property right data (hereinafter referred to as intellectual property right data) in a database, and for searching and browsing intellectual property right data.
However, as the number of intellectual property rights grows day by day, a lot of time and effort are required to analyze vast amounts of intellectual property rights. There is a growing demand for a system that automatically handles the analysis of intellectual property rights.
Prior art researches are used to extract similar patents after deriving retrieval expressions through technical classification.
Since it is difficult to derive a search formula through technical classification,
- a reference keyword combination for each product or technology,
- Request that the names of competitors based on core technology be provided as references.
The technology trend survey method,
The similar patents derived from the prior art researches that have been conducted in the past are divided into technologies and products.
In pursuing this method, it takes a lot of time to match with the related product by the patent (or technology), which makes analysis difficult.
- I would like to be provided with a way to effectively judge the trends of technology and products.
Competitor analysis,
We are analyzing the competitor's intellectual property right application or registration trend for already well-known competitors (Well-Known).
Such a method has difficulties in understanding the status of intellectual property application and registration of new or small competitors,
We have a problem in forecasting countermeasures against infringement lawsuits that may occur in the future.
- How to effectively identify new and small competitor information in the technology field,
- We request that information on infringement cases and trends by sector be provided.
The new patent direction setting,
To derive a business model through future technology forecasting, to acquire the technology (new patent) required for product or service implementation,
Technology Commercialization We are carrying out the steps for each month.
Currently, today's KIFRIS provides information on the applicant companies by super citations and IPC sections, but there is no detailed technical classification other than those of the applicants.
- a method of confirming application information which is classified by technology or product industry field,
- subdivide the IPC section to request service.
The method of setting the avoiding patent direction,
The claim component of the prior patent literature is divided into core components and limiting factors to determine whether infringement has occurred.
Such a method has a problem that it takes much time to identify key components and limiting elements when there are a large number of prior patent documents.
- Request that the preceding patent literature indicate key components and constraints so that they can be easily identified.
The method for supplementing the right-
We analyze and classify related core technologies based on products and services.
In such a case, when the products and services are composed of n products or more, detailed technical classification limitations make it difficult to supplement the whitening blank technology.
- According to the technical classification,
- Tech Tree uses CPC classification to ask users to provide detailed information.
The general domestic demand technology transfer flow is proceeding in the same way, and the effect is relatively low.
We predict that this method will be dependent on the companies that lack system analysis ability or product understanding.
In participating in the technology transfer, there was a difficulty in grasping the relevance of the technology of the institution with the company's product implementation.
- a method of retrieving the technology or product category list of the institutional possessions,
- We ask that you provide a way to easily search the portfolio or information on technology of foreign institutions and companies.
The model provided above is. It was derived by reinterpreting existing technology valuation models (profit approach, market approach, and cost approach) from a technical commercialization point of view,
The existing technology valuation method is problematic in deriving the result of the technical value evaluation that the company desires because it is dependent on the enterprise 's estimated financial statement or the evaluation of the technical rights,
In addition, since the technology life span reflects the median price provided by the USPTO, there is a limit to how long the technology commercialization period should be appropriate for the state of Korean technology commercialization.
- Providing information on the period required for technical commercialization,
- I would like to be provided with a percentage of the commercialization risk of the industry.
Prior Art Research
- a reference keyword combination for each product or technology,
- Request that the names of competitors based on core technology be provided as references.
Technology Trend Survey
- I would like to be provided with a way to effectively judge the trends of technology and products.
Competitor Analysis
- How to effectively identify new and small competitor information in the technology field,
- We request that information on infringement cases and trends by sector be provided.
New patent direction setting
- a method of confirming application information which is classified by technology or product industry field,
- subdivide the IPC section to request service.
Avoiding patent direction setting
- Request that the preceding patent literature indicate key components and constraints so that they can be easily identified.
Supplemental blanking
- According to the technical classification,
- Tech Tree uses CPC classification to ask users to provide detailed information.
Technology transfer commercialization
- a method of retrieving the technology or product category list of the institutional possessions,
- We ask that you provide a way to easily search the portfolio or information on technology of foreign institutions and companies.
Technical evaluation
- Providing information on the period required for technical commercialization,
- I would like to be provided with a percentage of the commercialization risk of the industry.
Prior Art Research
- Prior art research and competitor analysis in the technology field will be more convenient.
Technology Trend Survey
- It is easy to analyze new trends,
- It is expected that the convergence technology between industries will be activated and the economy will be expanded by creating a new industry.
Competitor Analysis
- Invisible competitor response can be prevented,
- We believe that the dispute can be activated.
New patent direction setting
- When filing a new patent application,
- It is easy to identify key competitors in the technology or product industry.
Avoiding patent direction setting
- Quickly identify key components of prior art documents,
- It is considered convenient to write avoiding patent and analyze rights.
Supplemental blanking
- It is judged that it will be easier for the company to supplement the right to arbitrary products.
Technology transfer commercialization
- The transfer of the necessary technology of the enterprise,
- Global cooperation is activated both at home and abroad,
- Patent information competitiveness will be strengthened.
Technical evaluation
- It is possible to estimate reasonable technology transfer costs,
- It is easy to select the technology required by the company,
- It is believed that securing of rights will be convenient in terms of technology commercialization.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating components of the 01.xx patent document selected for a patent list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing technical classification information of a 01.xx patent document selected for a patent list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing product classification information of 01.xx patent document selected for a patent list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating competitor classification information of a 01.xx patent document selected for a patent list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating detailed DB information required according to an embodiment of the present invention.
6 is a diagram illustrating a process of extracting a technology trend according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating the components of
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing technical classification information of a 01.Tx technology name selected for a technology list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
9 is a diagram illustrating product classification information of a 01.Px product name selected for a product list detected according to an input keyword according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating competitor classification information of a 01.Ax competitor name selected for a competitor list detected according to an input keyword according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
A key-word DB corresponding to the technical information is constructed.
And configures a key-word DB corresponding to the product information.
And constitutes a technical information DB corresponding to the applicant or competitor.
And constitutes a product information DB corresponding to the applicant or competitor.
A step of combining the technical name of the technical information DB and the product name of the product information DB according to the user input key-word
Receiving technology or product information from the user
Step of extracting key-word from inputted technology or product information
Providing the search expression to the user
When the name of the technology is input, the matching product information is provided to the user.
(If you enter the name of the technology, List Provide to the user.)
When the name of the technology is input, the key word is extracted and provided to the user.
Provide competitor information to the user when entering the name of the technology.
When the information of the product is input, the related technical information is provided to the user.
(When entering the information of the product, List Provide to the user.)
When the information of the product is inputted, the key word is extracted and provided to the user.
When the name of the product is input, the competitor information is provided to the user.
When the information of the competitor is inputted, the related product information is provided to the user.
(If you enter your competitor's information, List Provide to the user.)
Entering information from competitors Key - word Extract and provide it to the user.
Provide technical information to the user when entering information of a competitor.
If you enter a key-word, provide the user with relevant technical information.
When you enter a key-word, you provide relevant product information to the user.
If you enter a key-word, you provide relevant competitor information to the user.
In analyzing the inputted key-word combination, the similarity degree of the related technical information is determined, and the list of the priorities is listed and the list is provided to the user.
In the step of analyzing the combination of the inputted key-words, the similarity degree of the related product information is determined, and the list of the priorities is listed and the list is provided to the user.
In the analysis of the input key-word combination, the similarity degree between the related technical information and the product information is determined, and the list of the priorities is listed and the list is provided to the user. (Associated technical information and the Key input is required need be determined by integrating the degree of similarity between the product information in order to do this - individual technical information, and determines the degree of similarity between the product information, and the similarity of technical information, product information in accordance with the word combination A judgment function section for discriminating the need for additional function is required)
The user can update the provided technical information or product information or competitor information.
Prior art researches are used to extract similar patents after deriving retrieval expressions through technical classification.
Since it is difficult to derive a search formula through technical classification,
- a reference keyword combination for each product or technology,
- Request that the names of competitors based on core technology be provided as references.
If the above function is provided
- Prior art research and competitor analysis in the technology field will be more convenient.
The technology trend survey method,
The similar patents derived from the prior art researches that have been conducted are divided into technologies and products.
In pursuing this method, it takes a lot of time to match with the related product by the patent (or technology), which makes analysis difficult.
- I would like to be provided with a way to effectively judge the trends of technology and products.
If the above function is provided
- It is easy to analyze new trends,
- It is expected that the convergence technology between industries will be activated and the economy will be expanded by creating a new industry.
Competitor analysis,
We are analyzing the competitor's intellectual property right application or registration trend for already well-known competitors (Well-Known).
Such a method has difficulties in understanding the status of intellectual property application and registration of new or small competitors,
We have a problem in forecasting countermeasures against infringement lawsuits that may occur in the future.
- How to effectively identify new and small competitor information in the technology field,
- We request that infringement cases and trend information by industry or technology field be provided.
If the above function is provided
- Invisible competitor response can be prevented,
- We believe that the dispute can be activated.
The new patent direction setting,
To derive a business model through future technology forecasting, to acquire the technology (new patent) required for product or service implementation,
Technology Commercialization We are carrying out the steps for each month.
Today Today's KrisFris provides information on the applicants for each of the super citations and IPC sections,
There is no detailed technical classification other than those of the applicant.
- a method of confirming application information which is classified by technology or product industry field,
- subdivide the IPC section to request service.
If the above function is provided
- When filing a new patent application,
- It is easy to identify key competitors in the technology or product industry.
The method of setting the avoiding patent direction,
The claim component of the prior patent literature is divided into core components and limiting factors to determine whether infringement has occurred.
Such a method has a problem that it takes much time to identify key components and limiting elements when there are a large number of prior patent documents.
- Request that the preceding patent literature indicate key components and constraints so that they can be easily identified.
If the above function is provided
- Quickly identify key components of prior art documents,
- It is considered convenient to write avoiding patent and analyze rights.
The method for supplementing the right-
We analyze and classify related core technologies based on products and services.
In such a case, when the products and services are composed of n products or more, detailed technical classification limitations make it difficult to supplement the whitening blank technology.
- According to the technical classification,
- Tech Tree uses CPC classification to ask users to provide detailed information.
If the above function is provided
- It is judged that it will be easier for the company to supplement the right to arbitrary products.
Technology transfer and transfer technology commercialization,
Providing a list of desired demand technologies through participating in an agency's demand survey,
We select the desired technology from the list of requested technology, and complete the technology transfer through the technology negotiation.
The general domestic demand technology transfer flow is proceeding in the same way, and the effect is relatively low.
We predict that this method will be dependent on the companies that lack system analysis ability or product understanding.
Review the list of patent holdings of the institution to derive the technology corresponding to the Nordson product,
After evaluating the value of the technology (patent) using its own model, we transferred the technology.
In participating in the technology transfer, there was a difficulty in grasping the relevance of the technology of the institution with the company's product implementation.
- a method of retrieving the technology or product category list of the institutional possessions,
- We ask that you provide a way to easily search the portfolio or information on technology of foreign institutions and companies.
If the above function is provided
- The transfer of the necessary technology of the enterprise,
- Global cooperation is activated both at home and abroad,
- Patent information competitiveness will be strengthened.
The performance of technology valuation,
Technology commercialization The key patent evaluation model is applied.
The model provided above is. It was derived by reinterpreting existing technology valuation models (profit approach, market approach, and cost approach) from a technical commercialization point of view,
The existing technology valuation method is problematic in deriving the result of the technical value evaluation that the company desires because it is dependent on the enterprise 's estimated financial statement or the evaluation of the technical rights,
In addition, since the technology life span reflects the median price provided by the USPTO, there is a limit to how long the technology commercialization period should be appropriate for the state of Korean technology commercialization.
- Providing information on the period required for technical commercialization,
- I would like to be provided with a percentage of the commercialization risk of the industry.
If the above function is provided
- It is possible to estimate reasonable technology transfer costs,
- It is easy to select the technology required by the company,
- It is believed that securing of rights will be convenient in terms of technology commercialization.
The present invention is applicable to the service industry for intellectual property search or intellectual property right analysis.
Claims (1)
A detecting unit detecting a limiting element that defines a component and a component in the claims included in the intellectual property data detected according to the search formula;
And an output unit for marking the contents detected by the detection unit in a patent claim range and outputting the information to a user terminal.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150080455A KR20160144113A (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Intellectual Property Analysis System |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150080455A KR20160144113A (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Intellectual Property Analysis System |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20160144113A true KR20160144113A (en) | 2016-12-16 |
Family
ID=57735851
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020150080455A KR20160144113A (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-06-08 | Intellectual Property Analysis System |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20160144113A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111767370A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-10-13 | 北京墨丘科技有限公司 | Associated entity mining method, system and computer readable medium |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20140123647A (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-23 | (주)윕스 | System for analyzing intellectual property |
-
2015
- 2015-06-08 KR KR1020150080455A patent/KR20160144113A/en unknown
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20140123647A (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2014-10-23 | (주)윕스 | System for analyzing intellectual property |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111767370A (en) * | 2020-06-24 | 2020-10-13 | 北京墨丘科技有限公司 | Associated entity mining method, system and computer readable medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10242016B2 (en) | Systems and methods for management of data platforms | |
| US11244110B2 (en) | Method and system for suggesting revisions to an electronic document | |
| US20150356123A1 (en) | Systems and methods for management of data platforms | |
| US20140244524A1 (en) | System and method for identifying potential legal liability and providing early warning in an enterprise | |
| TWI709927B (en) | Method and device for determining target user group | |
| US10579651B1 (en) | Method, system, and program for evaluating intellectual property right | |
| US20130297519A1 (en) | System and method for identifying potential legal liability and providing early warning in an enterprise | |
| Guo et al. | An analysis framework for content-based job recommendation | |
| Uchitpe et al. | Predicting the future of project management research | |
| Connelly et al. | Diplomatic documents data for international relations: the Freedom of Information Archive Database | |
| CN112632405A (en) | Recommendation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| Chen et al. | ISTopic: Understanding information systems research through topic models | |
| Felicetti et al. | Total quality management and corporate social responsibility: a systematic review of the literature and implications of the COVID-19 pandemics | |
| Li et al. | Corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation: A bibliometric analysis | |
| CN108734021B (en) | Financial loan big data risk assessment method and system based on privacy-removing data | |
| EP3152678B1 (en) | Systems and methods for management of data platforms | |
| KR20160144113A (en) | Intellectual Property Analysis System | |
| Agarwala | The development of labor under contemporary capitalism | |
| CN110941952A (en) | Method and device for perfecting audit analysis model | |
| Hayashi et al. | Comparison between utility expectation of public and private data in the market of data | |
| Nasrizar | Big Data & Accounting Measurements | |
| de Fremery et al. | Monitoring the online antiquarian book trade: the public good and textual heritage in South Korea | |
| Verma et al. | Multi-structured data analytics using interactive visualization to aid business decision making | |
| Arnold et al. | Semi-automatic identification of counterfeit offers in online shopping platforms | |
| Kim et al. | Improving recommendation based on implicit trust relationships from tags |