KR20160135618A - Method for judging of machining error - Google Patents
Method for judging of machining error Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20160135618A KR20160135618A KR1020150069220A KR20150069220A KR20160135618A KR 20160135618 A KR20160135618 A KR 20160135618A KR 1020150069220 A KR1020150069220 A KR 1020150069220A KR 20150069220 A KR20150069220 A KR 20150069220A KR 20160135618 A KR20160135618 A KR 20160135618A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- cartridge
- error
- workpiece
- cartridges
- last
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
- B23Q17/20—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring workpiece characteristics, e.g. contour, dimension, hardness
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
- B23Q17/24—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves
- B23Q17/2452—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves for measuring features or for detecting a condition of machine parts, tools or workpieces
- B23Q17/2471—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves for measuring features or for detecting a condition of machine parts, tools or workpieces of workpieces
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
- B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
- B23Q17/24—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves
- B23Q17/248—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves using special electromagnetic means or methods
- B23Q17/249—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools using optics or electromagnetic waves using special electromagnetic means or methods using image analysis, e.g. for radar, infrared or array camera images
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/401—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by control arrangements for measuring, e.g. calibration and initialisation, measuring workpiece for machining purposes
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Constituent Portions Of Griding Lathes, Driving, Sensing And Control (AREA)
Abstract
Cartridges to which the respective workpieces are respectively coupled are detachably coupled to each side in plural on each side of a polygonal-shaped jig assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention, and a plurality of workpieces are connected to the same tool A first cartridge of the first cartridge and a last cartridge processed last of the cartridges are separated from the jig assembly and placed in an error measuring device while the workpieces are coupled to each other ; And an error measuring device for measuring an error between the first cartridge and the last cartridge and determining a processing error of the first through last cartridges as normal if the measured values are within an error range, And judging that the workpieces of the first to last cartridges are to be reprocessed if the workpieces are out of the tolerance range.
Description
One embodiment of the present invention relates to a method of determining the error of each work piece when a plurality of work pieces are processed using the cartridge.
The main purpose of the conventional jig device is to securely fix the workpiece to control the position of the workpiece during machining and measurement, and to prevent movement. In addition, in the conventional jig device, the work jig fixes the workpiece in each process, and the measurement jig at the time of three-dimensional measurement fixes the measurement direction. In a jig device that performs each dedicated role, the machining jig device not only softens the tool approach posture according to the limit value of the Y-axis tilt angle of the 5-axis machining center, but also the approach or retraction direction of the tool Dimensional measuring jig allows a smooth setting to be made so that a specific part desired by the operator can be accurately and quickly measured, Thereby preventing the shaking of the workpiece and minimizing the error rate.
In such a conventional jig device, a small number of workpieces must be processed separately for each process, and each of the workpieces must be separately measured using a measuring jig, which increases the processing time. In addition, since the conventional jig takes a method of fixing the workpiece after it is inserted into the jig, there is often a problem of flatness after the workpiece is completed. In addition, since a large number of maximum instantaneous power is required to move the workpiece to be processed by the tool, power consumption is high.
Therefore, a more improved jig assembly capable of mounting and machining a plurality of workpieces at the same time, improving the degree of defects such as flatness, and reducing the maximum power consumption can be considered.
In addition, a method of determining the machining error of each workpiece more economically by constructing such a jig assembly can be considered.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for determining a machining error of a plurality of workpieces by a method different from the conventional method.
According to an aspect of the present invention, cartridges to which workpieces are respectively coupled are detachably coupled to respective surfaces of the cartridges on respective surfaces of a polyhedron-formed jig assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention, A method for determining a machining error of a workpiece after machining a workpiece by the same tool by a horizontal positional movement or a rotary movement is characterized in that the workpiece is held in a state in which the first cartridge processed first and the last processed last cartridge Separating the jig from the jig assembly and arranging the jig in the error measuring device; And an error measuring device for measuring an error between the first cartridge and the last cartridge and determining a processing error of the first through last cartridges as normal if the measured values are within an error range, And judging that the workpieces of the first to last cartridges are to be reprocessed if the workpieces are out of the tolerance range.
According to one example related to the present invention, it is possible to further include a giving step of giving order to the processed cartridges.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, in the determining step, when the workpiece of the original cartridge is within an error range or the workpiece of the last cartridge is out of an error range, any one of the n < th > Setting the n-1 < th > cartridge to the last cartridge, and re-executing the determination step.
According to an example of the present invention, the selection of the n-th cartridge in the setting step may be set differently according to the error value of the last workpiece.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, when the error of the last cartridge corresponds to one of the predetermined error range lists in the setting step, the predetermined cartridge can be set as the nth cartridge.
The process error determination method according to at least one embodiment of the present invention configured as described above requires no errors or errors in each of the workpieces, It is possible to judge the error and judge the error.
Further, steps such as movement, machining, and error measurement of the workpiece are performed while being coupled to the cartridge.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a view showing an example of a machining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention; Fig.
Figure 2 illustrates an example of processing using a jig assembly in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a conceptual view of a jig assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 shows one side of the jig assembly shown in Figure 3;
5A is a conceptual view of a cartridge according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5B shows an inclined portion of the cartridge according to another embodiment of the present invention. FIG.
6 is a view showing an example in which a workpiece is mounted on the cartridge shown in Fig. 5A; Fig.
Figure 7 illustrates one side of a jig assembly in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
8 is a perspective view of a cartridge according to another embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 9 is a rear view of Fig. 8; Fig.
Fig. 10 is a view showing a body to which the cartridge shown in Fig. 8 is mounted; Fig.
11 is a photograph of a jig assembly according to a comparative example.
12 is a photograph showing an example of measuring a machining error of a case using the jig assembly according to Fig.
13 is a conceptual diagram showing an example of measuring a machining error of a case using a jig assembly according to embodiments of the present invention.
14 is a flowchart showing a method of processing a case using a jig assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention.
15 is a conceptual view showing a cartridge according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
16 is a rear perspective view of the cartridge shown in Fig. 15;
Fig. 17 is a side view showing a state in which a workpiece is coupled to the cartridge shown in Fig. 15; Fig.
18 is a view showing an example in which a cartridge is coupled to a body constituting a jig assembly;
Fig. 19 is a conceptual diagram showing a modified example of the cartridge shown in Fig. 15. Fig.
20 is a flowchart showing a method of processing a workpiece using a cartridge according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
21 is a conceptual diagram showing an example of measuring a machining error of a workpiece when using a jig assembly according to embodiments of the present invention;
FIG. 22 is a flowchart showing a method of determining a machining error after machining according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG.
Hereinafter, a processing error determination method according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The suffix "module" and " part "for the components used in the following description are given or mixed in consideration of ease of specification, and do not have their own meaning or role. In the present specification, the same or similar reference numerals are given to different embodiments in the same or similar configurations. As used herein, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
1 is a diagram showing an example of a
When the
When the size and shape of workpieces processed by a machining center or the like are varied, there is a problem in carrying and replacing the APC machine. In the case of machining one kind or several kinds of workpieces with one machine tool, It takes a lot of time to fix and position the workpiece and the tool each time it is replaced. Therefore, in order to shorten the stopping time of the machine, the standard type fixing jig may be attached directly to the table 150 of the
The jig assembly described below may be coupled to any
2 is a view showing an example of processing using a
As a result, the
FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of a
Referring to FIG. 3, the
3 to 4, the
As shown, the
The
2 through 4, the
In addition, the
The
5A is a conceptual view of the
The
And may further include an
5B is a view showing an
Referring to FIG. 5B, the
And may further include an
The
Fig. 6 is a view showing an example in which the
The
As a result, the
The
For example, if the
7 is a side view of a jig assembly in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 7, the
The
As described above, the
Referring again to FIG. 7, the
The
FIG. 8 is a perspective view showing a cartridge according to another embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 9 is a rear view of FIG. 8, and FIG. 10 is a view showing a body on which the cartridge shown in FIG. 8 is mounted.
8,
Referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, a plurality of
Here, the
A plurality of guide protrusions may be formed on the back surface of the
Fig. 11 is a photograph of a jig assembly according to a comparative example, and Fig. 12 is a photograph showing an example of measuring a processing error of a case when the jig assembly according to Fig. 11 is used.
The jig assembly according to the comparative example is fixed on the table, and four cases are arranged on the upper surface of the jig assembly. The tool is used to machine the case. In this case, the case is a metal case, and holes for inserting a charging jack, a microphone, an ear jack, and the like of the metal case may be formed using a tool, or holes may be formed for coupling the antenna.
When machining is finished, the tolerance caused by machining is measured. At this time, the case is separated from the jig assembly, and the error of the case is measured separately. When an error occurs, it is re-coupled to the jig assembly.
13 is a conceptual diagram showing an example of measuring a machining error of a case using a jig assembly according to embodiments of the present invention.
Using a jig assembly according to embodiments of the present invention makes it easier to measure machining errors. That is, the processed case is not separated from the
More specifically, in the case of using the jig assembly according to the embodiments of the present invention, after the plurality of cases arranged on one side of the
On the contrary, in the case of the comparative example, since the jig assembly is fixed on the table, the cases must be separated from the jig assembly. At this time, if a force exceeding a predetermined level is applied, there may be a problem in the flatness of the case. Also, when the case is moved to the error measuring device, the case may be inadvertently damaged. If the case is manually moved, the workload increases and the production cost increases. Further, when an error occurs, a separate operation for fixing the workpiece to the jig assembly for reworking is required.
Compared with the comparative example, the superiority of the present invention is highlighted. In the comparative example, only about four cases were machined simultaneously, and each was separated from the jig assembly, and the error was measured and reworked. However, according to the present invention, a total of 64 cases can be machined at the same time, and after the machining is completed, the
The metal case of the mobile terminal can be more efficiently processed by using the
14 is a view showing a method of processing a case using a
Referring to Fig. 14, a method of processing a case using the
In the fixing step, the cases, which are the
In the coupling step, the
In the machining step, the case disposed on any one of the mounting surfaces can be machined by using the tool. When the cases are arranged in plural, the
Then, the
Thus, a large amount of
As described above, by using the machining method according to the embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of
FIG. 15 is a conceptual view showing a cartridge according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 16 is a rear perspective view of the cartridge shown in FIG. 15, And Fig. 18 is a view showing an example in which the cartridge is coupled to the body constituting the jig assembly.
Referring to Figs. 15 and 16, the
And may further include an
The
A fixing
Referring to FIG. 17, at least two
Referring to FIGS. 16 and 18, a plurality of
Here, the
A plurality of guide protrusions may be formed on the back surface of the
Fig. 19 is a conceptual diagram showing a modified example of the cartridge shown in Fig. 15. Fig.
Referring to FIG. 19, the
20 is a flowchart showing a method of processing a workpiece using a cartridge according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The greatest feature of the processing method using the cartridge according to the embodiment of the present invention is that the workpiece to be processed is processed from the initial arrival to the cartridge and remains coupled to the cartridge until the error is measured. However, it is not excluded from the scope of the right to cancel the union of the cartridge and the workpiece for a more suitable machining in at least some steps.
Referring to FIG. 20, a fixing step is performed first. In the fixing step, each cartridge is given a serial number, and the workpiece is fixed to the cartridge. For example, when a total of thirty-two cartridges are assembled into a jig assembly, the cartridges to be processed first are numbered 1, and the cartridges are numbered to be numbered 32 in the order in which they are processed. When the cartridge according to the present invention is formed so as to correspond to the normal shape of the workpiece to be processed, if the workpiece is normally coupled to the cartridge, the dimensional error of the workpiece can be firstly determined before the machining. For example, when a defect occurs in a workpiece, it is possible to confirm whether or not the workpiece is defective by merely attaching the workpiece to the cartridge. If a shape error occurs in the workpiece, it may not fit into the protrusion of the cartridge or may not be inserted into the receiving portion of the cartridge.
Then, a placement step is performed. In the placement step, the numbered cartridges are arranged on each side of the body constituting the jig assembly so that the cartridges are sequentially processed according to the number. When the cartridges are normally disposed, a processing step of sequentially processing the workpieces is performed according to the number. The detailed processing method is as described with reference to Fig. When the machining is completed, the machining error of the workpieces is sequentially determined according to the number.
As described above, according to the present invention, movement, machining, and error determination can be performed while the workpieces are coupled to the cartridge from the fixing step to the judging step.
21 is a conceptual diagram showing an example of measuring a machining error of a
The steps of measuring the error as shown in FIG. 21 can also be performed while the
More specifically, when using a jig assembly according to embodiments of the present invention, after machining a plurality of cases disposed on one side of the
As shown in FIG. 21, when the
FIG. 22 is a flowchart showing a method of determining machining error after machining according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
In the machining method according to the embodiment of the present invention, since machining of a plurality of workpieces is performed by the same tool, errors are less likely to occur. Even if an error occurs, it is not necessary to check or judge all the errors of the respective workpieces, and only the errors of the first and last workpieces can be inspected or judged. For example, if an error occurs in the first workpiece, all errors will occur to the last workpiece. This feature makes it easy to check or judge errors. Due to this characteristic, the following errors can be examined or judged.
Referring to FIG. 22, the post-machining machining error determination method includes a placement step and a determination step. In the placement step, the first cartridge processed first and the last cartridge processed last of the cartridges are separated from the jig assembly and are placed in the error measuring device while the workpieces are coupled to the cartridge. When the error of the workpieces of the first cartridge and the last cartridge is measured using the error measuring device, if the measured values are within the error range, the processing errors of the first to last cartridges are judged as normal, If the range is out of range, the workpieces of the first to last cartridges are judged to be reprocessed.
Determining the nth cartridge of any one of the first to last cartridges as the first cartridge when the workpiece of the first cartridge is within an error range but the workpiece of the last cartridge is out of the error range, And a setting step of re-executing the determination step. For example, if a total of 32 cartridges are processed, the first cartridge, which is the first cartridge, is normal, and the last cartridge, 32, is abnormal, arbitrarily set 17 as the initial cartridge, 16 as the last cartridge, Determine the machining error of the workpiece. At this time, the cartridges from No. 17 to No. 32 perform rework. When the machining is completed, the judgment step is re-executed. If it is determined that the machining is abnormal, the setting step and the judgment step are performed again until it is judged as normal.
It is possible to more effectively select an arbitrary cartridge according to the degree of error. That is, it is possible to set the cartridge in which the problem of machining error is caused according to the experience in which the machining error has occurred. For example, if a machining error of the first cartridge occurred in the past, or if a machining error of 10 was generated in the last cartridge, if an error occurred from the fifth cartridge, it is recorded. If a machining error of 10 occurs, If an error has occurred from the 13th cartridge when a machining error of 6 has occurred in the last cartridge in the past, it is recorded. If a machining error of 6 occurs, the 13th cartridge is set to be reworked. This makes it possible to check or judge errors in workpieces faster.
In other words, the selection of the nth cartridge in the setting step can be set differently according to the error value of the last workpiece.
If the error of the last cartridge corresponds to one of the predetermined error range lists in the setting step, the predetermined cartridge can be set as the nth cartridge.
As described above, according to the present invention, even if an error occurs, it is not necessary to check or determine all the errors of the respective workpieces, and only the errors of the first and last workpieces can be examined or judged to determine the error.
On the other hand, the imparting step may be performed in a stage prior to the arranging step, and the order is given to the processed cartridges in the delivering step. For example, cartridges can be serialized.
The method of determining a machining error as described above is not limited to the configuration and method of the embodiments described above, but the embodiments may be modified such that all or some of the embodiments are selectively combined .
Claims (5)
A disposing step of disposing, in the error measuring apparatus, the first processed cartridge and the last processed cartridge out of the cartridges from the jig assembly while the workpieces are combined; And
Wherein when an error between the first cartridge and the last cartridge is measured using the error measuring device and the measured values are within an error range, the processing error of the first through last cartridges is determined to be normal, And judging that the workpieces of the first to last cartridges are to be reprocessed if the error range is outside the error range.
Further comprising the step of giving an order to the processed cartridges.
In the determination step,
And sets the nth cartridge of any one of the first to last cartridges as the first cartridge when the workpiece of the first cartridge is within the error range and the workpiece of the last cartridge is out of the error range, Further comprising a setting step of setting the cartridge to the last cartridge and re-executing the determination step.
Wherein the selection of the nth cartridge in the setting step is set differently according to an error value of the last workpiece.
If the error of the last cartridge corresponds to one of the preset error range lists in the setting step, sets the predetermined cartridge to the nth cartridge.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020150069220A KR20160135618A (en) | 2015-05-18 | 2015-05-18 | Method for judging of machining error |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020150069220A KR20160135618A (en) | 2015-05-18 | 2015-05-18 | Method for judging of machining error |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20160135618A true KR20160135618A (en) | 2016-11-28 |
Family
ID=57706765
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020150069220A KR20160135618A (en) | 2015-05-18 | 2015-05-18 | Method for judging of machining error |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20160135618A (en) |
-
2015
- 2015-05-18 KR KR1020150069220A patent/KR20160135618A/en active IP Right Grant
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9457962B1 (en) | Pallet/flip unit/gantry system | |
US8579271B2 (en) | Machine tool with a workpiece mounting block | |
JP2010188519A (en) | Milling method and milling apparatus for automatically machining cuboid workpiece | |
JP5575689B2 (en) | Thin plate processing apparatus and method for manufacturing thin plate member | |
JP2016209989A (en) | Honing machine | |
US10232481B2 (en) | Workpiece holding fixture for machining multiple prismatic parts | |
JP2016137566A (en) | Gear or profile grinding machine and method for operation of the grinding machine | |
US20170282314A1 (en) | Workpiece holding fixture for machining multiple prismatic parts | |
US20060287174A1 (en) | Machine tool provided with pallet changing module | |
KR20160135616A (en) | Jig assembly and machining apparatus having the same | |
JP5356879B2 (en) | Machine tool system model switching method and apparatus | |
JP4700590B2 (en) | Horizontal machining center | |
KR101868559B1 (en) | Machining center with symmetrical machining module | |
JP2009178804A (en) | Machine tool with boring bar magazine, and boring bar magazine | |
KR101523364B1 (en) | Jig assembly and machining apparatus having the same | |
KR20160135618A (en) | Method for judging of machining error | |
KR20160135615A (en) | Machining method using cartridge | |
KR102324545B1 (en) | Automatic attachment changer and boring machine including the same | |
CN110369967A (en) | A kind of process for machining of high-precision workpiece | |
KR101523365B1 (en) | Method of case manufacturing using jig assembly | |
KR100959221B1 (en) | Index table | |
KR20160135620A (en) | Jig assembly for manufacturing case of mobile terminal | |
JP7194537B2 (en) | Reversing unit and processing equipment | |
CN209774065U (en) | Clamping tool for horizontal machine tool | |
KR101891576B1 (en) | Vertical machining center with automatic pallet changer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right |