KR20160114308A - Combat entity based modeling system to enable interactive analysis of performance/engagement effectiveness - Google Patents

Abstract

Provided in the present invention is a concept modeling system of a battle entity, capable of mutually analyzing performance / battle effectiveness. The concept modeling system of the battle entity capable of mutually analyzing performance / battle effectiveness comprises: multiple single battle entity model units classified to form a horizontal class with respect to the range of the model; and an interface unit for the interaction between the multiple single battle entity model units and for the vertical interaction in each of the multiple single battle entity model units.

Description

{COMBAT ENTITY BASED MODELING SYSTEM TO ENABLE INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE / ENGAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS}

FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a conceptual modeling system for a combat entity, and more particularly to a submarine. The present invention relates to a conceptual modeling system of a combat entity capable of mutual analysis of performance / engagement effectiveness for use of simulation with respect to a combat entity such as a naval ship, a naval ship, and a torpedo.

Typically, a new concept Next Generation combat platform / weapon system, such as a new fighter / submarine, a mobile term, or a wire-guided torpedo. It takes enormous budget and time to develop.

Therefore, from the early stage of development, it is necessary to continuously review the appropriateness of military needs through system performance analysis and to develop tactics / doctrines that can effectively operate them.

In the aspect of M & S (Modeling and Simulation) development, there was a lack of techniques for expressing battlefield functions and combat logic close to reality.

There is a limit in terms of model reusability in modifying / expanding the modeling results according to the changing engagement situations.

In the past, we developed a model design method that can be reconfigured only for some elements of battlefield function and combat logic.

Also, from the viewpoint of simulation analysis (effect analysis), there has been a problem in that it is not flexible in mutual analysis of the performance / engagement effectiveness since the simulation analysis of some elements among the battle function and the combat logic element has been performed conventionally.

In summary, many studies on M & S of combat platform / weapon system in many domestic / foreign cases have been conducted, and they have expressed battle platform / weapon system close to reality in expressing combat logic and combat logic Techniques were lacking. There were limitations in modifying / expanding the modeling results according to changing engagement situations.

In particular, they propose a modeling method that is flexible in reconfiguration for only some of the elements of combat logic and combat logic. Therefore, they are limited in terms of model reusability for mutual analysis of various performance / engagement effects.

Simulation Combat Simulation System and Method for Analysis of Weapon System Combat Effect (Patent Application No. 10-2013-0067904)

An object of the present invention is a submarine. The present invention provides a conceptual modeling system of a combat entity capable of mutual analysis of the performance / engagement effectiveness for the use of simulation for a combat entity such as a naval ship, a naval ship, and a torpedo.

In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a conceptual modeling system for a combat entity capable of mutual analysis of performance / engagement effectiveness.

The conceptual modeling system of a combat entity capable of mutual analysis of the performance / engagement effectiveness diagrams includes a plurality of single combat entity model units classified to form a horizontal hierarchy according to a range of a model; And an interface for interaction between the plurality of single combat entity model units and vertical interaction in each of the plurality of single combat entity model units.

The plurality of single combat entity model units may include a plurality of upper model units separated according to horizontal layering; And a lower model unit connected to the plurality of upper model units and being divided into a plurality in accordance with the vertical layering.

The upper model portion is preferably classified according to the range of the model.

Preferably, the upper model unit includes a control model, a detection model, and a startup model that are independently classified along the horizontal direction and perform their own tasks.

Wherein the lower model part is classified into the control model, the detection model, and the startup model according to a vertical hierarchy, and the plurality of lower models are classified into a control model and a plurality of tasks having tasks of performing the tasks of the detection model and the startup model, And a plurality of behavioral models that are classified vertically and hierarchically with the plurality of task models and perform actions required to perform the tasks.

Wherein the interface unit includes a control interface, a first interface for interaction between the task model and the behavior model in each of the detection model and the startup model, and a second interface for interaction between the task model and the behavior model, Interface.

The present invention is advantageous in that it enables reusability of sub-models not only in the battlefield functional elements but also in terms of combat logic elements in terms of M & S development, and is flexible in modifying / expanding sub-models that may occur during the simulation analysis process .

In addition, since the battle logic model interacts with the battle logic element and the battleground function element in the simulation analysis aspect, the battle logic element and the battleground function element can be balanced, and the performance / Interactive analysis is possible.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a conceptual model of a combat entity applying the two-dimensional model partitioning technique of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the structure of a performance / engagement effectiveness analysis model including battle entities.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, a conceptual modeling system of a combat entity capable of mutually analyzing the performance / engagement effectiveness of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a view showing a conceptual model construction diagram of a combat entity applying the two-dimensional model partitioning technique of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a structure of a performance / engagement effectiveness model including a combat entity.

Referring to FIG. 1, the conceptual modeling system of a combat entity of the present invention includes a plurality of single combat entity model units 100 classified to form a horizontal hierarchy according to a range of models, and a plurality of single combat entity model units 100 And an interface unit (I / F 1, I / F 2) for vertical interaction in each of the plurality of single combat entity model units 100.

The plurality of single combat entity model units 100 may include an upper model unit 110 divided into a plurality of units according to horizontal layering and a plurality of upper model units 110 connected to the plurality of upper model units 110, And a lower model part 120 which is a lower model part.

The upper model unit 110 includes a control model, a detection model, and a start-up model that are independently classified along the horizontal direction and perform their own tasks.

The lower model part 120 is classified according to a vertical hierarchy in each of the control model, the detection model, and the startup model, and includes a control model, a task for performing the tasks of the detection model and the startup model And a plurality of behavioral models classified into the vertical hierarchy with the plurality of task models and performing actions required to perform the tasks.

The above configuration will be described in detail with reference to a two-dimensional model partitioning method of a combat entity reflecting the battlefield function and combat logic elements.

The conceptual model design according to the present invention can divide the subdivided combat logic element and the overall functional element into sub-models, and combine them to construct the entire model.

Combat logic elements include command and control, armed assignment / leadership, and tactical maneuver / avoidance

In the following description of the present invention, the sub-model that operates as described above is referred to as a control model.

In order for the control model to make a decision through tactical operation, it should be based on data obtained from various detection devices such as a radar and a sonar.

In addition, the outcome of a decision may be a commanding order such as an armed assignment / command, but may also appear as a dynamic movement of a combat entity, such as a tactical maneuver / evasion.

A model that provides detection information to the control model is called a sensing model.

A model that performs dynamic motion for decision making of a control model is called a moving model.

As described above, the control model, the detection model, and the start-up model can be the overall function elements of the battle entity model.

Therefore, the proposed combat entity model can be subdivided into sub-models of detection / control / maneuver according to battle function and combat logic element horizontally

Next, a method for vertically subdividing the detection / control / activation sub-models is described.

The sub-model is divided into a task model (TM) layer and a behavior model layer (AM) according to the level of abstraction of the model and the time at which it is specified.

Like the control part model that is subdivided into TM and AM according to the combat logic element, the detection / activation part models can also be classified into TM and AM.

This is because full-function functional activities, such as maneuvering and detection, are carried out across all practical tasks, and the concrete actions of these activities can be regarded as actions, just like the control part model

For example, the TM of the startup sub-model carries out a series of processes of renewing and activating a command received from the control model in an upper concept, and actually performing the specific motion by interpreting such a command is executed through AM.

As described above, in the present invention, a method of dividing a combat entity according to an abstraction level vertically according to an element can be referred to as a two-dimensional model division technique.

In the present invention, there is an advantage in terms of reusability of the sub-models due to the coupling characteristics of the sub-models clearly distinguished by a certain criterion, and thus it can be effectively applied to the iterative / incremental mutual analysis in which modification and expansion of some models occur .

Referring to FIG. 1, each combat entity model (combat entity 1, 2...) Comprises a detection / control / starter sub-model, and each sub-model is also hierarchically classified by TM and AM.

In addition, the three parameters of the combat logic element need not be designed as a model, so they are treated as TM internal variables.

The six clearly categorized components interact only through the defined interfaces (I / F1, I / F2).

The regional nature of these components is essential for the mutual analysis of the systems. That is, the segmented design of the components of interest facilitates the implementation of the individual components and enables the activities / attributes such as just-in-time development and concurrent engineering, interoperability and reusability technically.

One combat entity model interacts with the first and second interfaces (I / F 1, I / F 2), which are communication mediums.

This type of independent systems is called the System of Systems, and the method for M & S of the combined system can be roughly divided into two.

First, in the single computing environment, several subsystems share information and cooperate in one form. In the second, in the single / distributed computing environment, the interoperability using the mediator such as HLA / RTI ).

These model combinations and model interactions can be selected by various criteria such as simulation performance, model reusability, and distributed environment.

Referring to FIG. 2, a real system includes a plurality of battle entity systems participating in a battle in a given battlefield environment, and a battle entity system also includes a plurality of sub systems.

For example, a submarine, which is one of the combat entity systems, is equipped with an air control system for air conditioning, a propulsion system for submersible, a launcher system for arming, and the external pressure of the deep sea, as well as a maneuvering / combat / And the hull structural system that can be used.

The model may be a process of abstracting the system to a predetermined modeling purpose, rather than representing 100% of the target system.

In the present invention, since the purpose of modeling is a mutual analysis of performance / engagement effectiveness, only the battle functional elements (detection / maneuvering system) and combat logic elements (battle system) required for mutual analysis are modeled in detail and the remaining sub- It can be excluded or, if necessary, simply parameterized and processed as a data variable.

Such an abstraction process implies that models may differ for the same target system if the purpose of modeling is different.

For example, when modeling the submarine's ability to engage, rather than its engagement capability, only the propulsion and maneuvering systems in the sub-system need to be modeled in detail.

The purpose of this modeling process is called Objective-driven Modeling, and the two-dimensional model partitioning method focusing on detection / combat / maneuvering systems for mutual analysis of performance / It can be seen as an approach.

Through the above-described structure and operation, the embodiment according to the present invention can easily reusability of sub-models not only in terms of battle function elements but also in terms of combat logic elements in terms of M & S development, It can be flexible in modifying / expanding possible sub-models.

In addition, in the embodiment of the present invention, since the combat logic model and the battle logic element interact with each other in the simulation analysis, the combat logic element and the battle field function element can be balanced, Interactive analysis of performance / engagement effectiveness may be possible.

Although the concrete modeling system of the combat entity capable of mutual analysis of the performance / engagement effectiveness of the present invention has been described above, it is obvious that various modifications can be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention .

Therefore, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the above-described embodiments, but should be determined by the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

It is to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive in all respects and that the scope of the present invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, It is intended that all changes and modifications derived from the equivalent concept be included within the scope of the present invention.

1: battle object
100: Single combat object model part
110: upper model part
120: Lower model part
TM: Task Model
AM: Behavioral model

Claims (5)

A plurality of single combat entity model parts classified to form a horizontal hierarchy according to the range of the model; And
And an interface unit for interaction between the plurality of single combat entity model units and vertical interaction in each of the plurality of single combat entity model units. Conceptual modeling system.
The method according to claim 1,
Wherein the plurality of single combat entity model units include:
An upper model part which is divided into a plurality of parts in accordance with the horizontal layering;
And a lower model unit connected to the plurality of upper model units and being divided into a plurality of lower model units according to vertical layering.
3. The method of claim 2,
The upper model unit,
It is classified according to the range of the model,
A concept modeling system of a combat entity, which is capable of mutually analyzing a performance / engagement effect diagram, characterized by having a control model, a detection model, and a maneuvering model, which are independently classified along a horizontal line and perform their own mission.
The method of claim 3,
Wherein the lower-
A plurality of task models, which are classified according to a vertical hierarchy in each of the control model, the detection model and the startup model, and having a task of performing the tasks of the control model and the detection model and the startup model,
And a plurality of behavioral models classified in a vertical hierarchy with the plurality of task models and performing actions required to perform the task, the method comprising: system.
5. The method of claim 4,
The interface unit includes:
A first interface for interaction between the task model and the behavior model in each of the detection model and the startup model;
And a second interface for interaction between the plurality of upper model units. The system of claim 1,

Images