KR20150077796A - System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification - Google Patents
System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20150077796A KR20150077796A KR1020130166642A KR20130166642A KR20150077796A KR 20150077796 A KR20150077796 A KR 20150077796A KR 1020130166642 A KR1020130166642 A KR 1020130166642A KR 20130166642 A KR20130166642 A KR 20130166642A KR 20150077796 A KR20150077796 A KR 20150077796A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- disputed
- dispute
- value
- information
- model
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a patent dispute risk metric information processing system that reflects the importance of each patent in a dispute, and to an information processing method of the system.
The patent dispute risk metric information processing system includes (A) obtaining a set of disputed patents comprising at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents; (B) obtaining dispute information related to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set; (C) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent in the disputed patent set; and (D) assigning the disputed numerical value to the disputed patent set and at least two non-disputed numerical values In the case of a non-disputed patent set composed of a disputed patent, the disputed numerical value and the non-disputed numerical reference value are set as reaction variable values, and at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non- And establishing at least one patent dispute risk measurement model using statistical techniques.
Using the present invention, a patent dispute risk metric information model that reflects the importance of each disputed patent is made possible. An information processing system equipped with a patent dispute risk metric information model that reflects the importance of each patent in a dispute is utilized and the information processing system Information service becomes possible.
Description
The present invention relates to a patent dispute risk metering information processing system and an information processing method of the system, and more particularly, to a patent dispute risk metering information processing system that reflects the importance of each patent in a dispute .
In the era of patent wars, patent disputes are rapidly increasing worldwide. Traditionally, it has been at a level that enables to construct dispute information about patent disputes through DB, to analyze dispute information, to transmit dispute information to newsletters, or to search for dispute information. These services did not provide predictive information on future disputes as a service to patent disputes that occurred in the past.
The conventional patent dispute risk metering information processing system or the patent dispute risk metric information model has a limit to deal with patent dispute risk unilaterally without reflecting the inherent importance of each patent dispute.
Therefore, it has been urgently required to develop a patent dispute risk metric information processing system, which reflects the importance of each patent, and an information processing method of the system.
The first technical problem to be solved by the present invention is a patent dispute risk metric information processing system in which importance of each patent is reflected.
A second technical problem to be solved by the present invention is a method for processing information of a patent dispute risk metric information processing system in which importance of each patent is reflected.
A third technical problem to be solved by the present invention is a recording medium on which a computer-readable program is recorded, on which an information processing method of a patent dispute risk metric information processing system reflecting the importance of a patent for a dispute is incorporated.
A fourth technical problem to be solved by the present invention is a recording medium on which a computer-readable program is recorded, in which a patent dispute risk metric information processing system, which reflects the importance of each patent dispute, is mounted.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for processing information on a patent dispute risk metric information processing system, the method comprising: (A) Obtaining a set of disputed patents; (B) obtaining dispute information related to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set; (C) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent in the disputed patent set; and (D) assigning the disputed numerical value to the disputed patent set and at least two non-disputed numerical values In the case of a non-disputed patent set composed of a disputed patent, the disputed numerical value and the non-disputed numerical reference value are set as reaction variable values, and at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non- Establishing at least one patent dispute risk measurement model using statistical techniques, wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information, And the type of the disputed numerical value is different according to the disputed patent PATENT risk of metering information processing system, characterized in that it is presented in the information processing method.
(E) applying the patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model.
The quasi-litigation patent may be one or more of the patents used in the judgment or reexam, or the litigation patent may be any of the patents used in the judicial jurisdiction litigation, or the patents used in the administrative litigation .
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of the number of disputes of the disputed patent, the point of dispute, the type of dispute, the number of defendants and the defendant number.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period in which the patent is used.
It is preferable that the number of independent defendants is the number of defendants who do not share the longest identical character string in the defendant's name.
The disputed patent set obtained in the step (A) is a subset of the total disputed patent set, the non-disputing patent set in the step (D) is a subset of the entire non-disputing patent set, It is desirable that the disputed patent set has at least one or more shared attributes.
The shared attribute is a point-in-time shared, and the response variable value and the description variable value are generated based on the specific point in time.
The response variable is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model end point, and the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of a technology group, a state group, an industry group, a time group, and a right attribute group and a party attribute group to which the dispute patent belongs.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a patent dispute risk metering information processing system, comprising: a patent dispute risk metering modeling engine that performs a function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling; ; A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model; And a patent dispute risk metering model DB for storing data generated by the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, The disputed patent and the non-disputed patent are generated using statistical techniques using the disputed numerical value as a response variable and using at least two or more explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent , The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module The patent dispute risk metric model is used to assign a patent dispute risk metric model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs, and the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the disputant information , The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information, and the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents. present.
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and a property group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period in which the patent is used.
The shared attributes of the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set are shared at a specific time point, and the response variable value and the explained variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The response variable is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model end point, and the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided an information processing method of a patent dispute risk metering information processing system, comprising: (a) Obtaining a set of disputed patents; (G) obtaining dispute information relating to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set; (H) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set; (I) weighted sampling of the disputed patent in the set of disputed patented disputed numerical values; (J) sampling a non-disputing patent in a non-disputed patent set to which no disputed numerical value is assigned, and (K) performing statistical modeling using the weighted sampled disputed patent and the non- , The statistical model may be applied to a disputed patent set consisting of at least two non-disputing patents granted with the disputed numerical value and weighted sampled disputed patent set and a non-disputed numerical standard value, And a non-disputed numerical reference value is set as a reaction variable value, and at least one patent dispute risk measurement model is established by applying statistical techniques using at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent The disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information, and the dispute information is generated by processing the disputed information Wherein the disputed patent information includes at least one of a dispute occurrence information and a disputant party information, and the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents. do.
The weighted sampling is preferably generated using the disputed numeric value.
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of the number of disputes of the disputed patent, the point of dispute, the type of dispute, the number of defendants and the defendant number.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period in which the patent is used.
The disputed numeric value is preferably a number of disputes of a predetermined time period.
The disputed patent aggregation is a subset of the total disputed patent aggregation, the non-disputing patent aggregation is a subset of the entire non-disputing patent aggregation, and the disputed patent aggregation and the non-disputing patent aggregation have at least one shared attribute .
The shared attribute is a point-in-time shared, and the response variable value and the description variable value are generated based on the specific point in time.
The response variable is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model end point, and the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
(L) applying the patent dispute risk measurement model value to the dispute patent and the population patent to which the non-dispute patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a patent dispute risk metering information processing system, comprising: a patent dispute risk metering modeling engine that performs a function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling; ; A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model; And a patent dispute risk metering model DB for storing data generated by the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, The disputed patent set included in the disputed patent set is weighted sampled in consideration of the disputed numerical value, and the disputed patent granted value given to the weighted sampled disputed patent and the non-disputed patent granted value And the disputed patent and the non-dispute The patent dispute risk metric model value generation module is generated using statistical techniques using at least two explanatory variable values for each patent, and the patent dispute risk metric model value generation module generates the patent dispute risk metric model value using the patent dispute risk metric model, A patent dispute risk measurement model value is assigned to a population patent to which a dispute patent belongs, and the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information, and the dispute information includes any one of dispute occurrence information and disputant information And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents, thereby providing a patent dispute risk metric information processing system.
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and a property group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the independent defendant number information and the disputant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used.
The shared attribute of the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set is shared at a specific time point, and the response variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated on the basis of the specific time point.
The response variable is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model end point, and the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a recording medium on which a computer-readable program is recorded, the program comprising: (M) obtaining a set of disputed patents comprising at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents; step; (N) obtaining dispute information related to the disputed patent from the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set; (O) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set; and (P) assigning the disputed numerical value to the disputed patent set, and (P) In the case of a non-disputed patent set composed of a disputed patent, the disputed numerical value and the non-disputed numerical reference value are set as reaction variable values, and at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non- And establishing at least one patent dispute risk metering model using statistical techniques, wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information, Occurrence information and the disputant party information, and the type of the disputed numeric value is Presents a program recording medium that can be read by a computer, it characterized in that it can be different for each group disputed patents.
The response variable may be generated based on a time from a specific time point to a model end point, and the explanatory variable value may be generated based on a model starting time point to the specific time point.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable recording medium having a function of generating at least one patent dispute risk measurement model through patent dispute risk measurement modeling A patent dispute risk measurement modeling engine; A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model; And a patent dispute risk metering model DB for storing data generated by the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, The disputed patent and the non-disputed patent are generated using statistical techniques using the disputed numerical value as a response variable and using at least two or more explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent , The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module The patent dispute risk metric model is used to assign a patent dispute risk metric model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs, and the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the disputant information , The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information, and the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents. And presents the recorded recording medium.
The shared attribute of the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set is shared at a specific time point, and the response variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated on the basis of the specific time point.
The response variable is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model end point, and the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and a property group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a recording medium on which a computer-readable program is recorded, the program comprising the steps of: (a) receiving a set of disputed patents comprising at least two litigated and semi-litigated patents; ; (R) obtaining dispute information relating to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set; (S) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set; (T) weighted sampling of the disputed patent in the set of disputed patented disputed numerical values; (U) sampling a non-disputed patent in a non-disputed patent set to which the disputed numerical value is not assigned, and (V) performing statistical modeling using the weighted sampled disputed patent and the non-disputed patent The statistical model is based on a non-disputed patent set consisting of at least two non-disputed patents given a disputed numerical value and a weighted sampled disputed patent set and a non-disputed numerical standard value , The statistical technique is applied to the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent by using explanatory variable values of at least two explanatory variables for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent, A risk metric model is established, and the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information Wherein the dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information, and the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents. And presents the recorded recording medium.
The weighted sampling is preferably generated using the disputed numeric value.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable recording medium having a function of generating at least one patent dispute risk measurement model through patent dispute risk measurement modeling A patent dispute risk measurement modeling engine; A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model; And a patent dispute risk metering model DB for storing data generated by the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, The disputed patent set included in the disputed patent set is weighted sampled in consideration of the disputed numerical value, and the disputed patent granted value given to the weighted sampled disputed patent and the non-disputed patent granted value And the disputed patent and the non-dispute The patent dispute risk metric model value generation module is generated using statistical techniques using at least two explanatory variable values for each patent, and the patent dispute risk metric model value generation module generates the patent dispute risk metric model value using the patent dispute risk metric model, A patent dispute risk measurement model value is assigned to a population patent to which a dispute patent belongs, and the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information, and the dispute information includes any one of dispute occurrence information and disputant information And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents, and a recording medium on which the computer readable program is recorded is presented.
The disputed numeric value is preferably generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and a property group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
Preferably, the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the independent defendant number information and the disputant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used.
The present invention has the following effects.
First, the patent dispute risk metric information model, which reflects the importance of each patent, becomes possible.
Second, the information processing system equipped with the patent dispute risk metric information model, which reflects the importance of each patent by the disputed patent, and the information service using the information processing system becomes possible.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a patent dispute risk metering information processing system of the present invention. FIG.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an exemplary information processing method of a patent dispute risk metering information processing system that establishes a patent dispute risk metering model of the present invention.
3 is a diagram of an exemplary configuration for generating a disputed numerical value of a patent dispute risk metering information processing system of the present invention.
4 is a diagram of another exemplary embodiment information processing method of a patent dispute risk metering information processing system for establishing a patent dispute risk metering model of the present invention.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings.
1 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary configuration of a patent dispute risk metering
The patent dispute risk metric
The patent dispute risk
The
The
An exemplary information processing method of a patent dispute risk metering
The patent dispute risk
In order to establish the patent dispute risk measurement model, the explanatory variable value is generated for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent based on the specific time T1. The explanatory variable is a variable that is generated by utilizing the information included in the
A1, B1, D1, E1 based on the type of patent holder
A1, B1, D1, E1 based on the type ratio of patent holders
A1, B1, D1, E1 based on patent classification of patents
Table 1 will be described. The types of right holders are divided into companies, institutions, universities and individuals, which can be divided into domestic and foreign countries. Companies can be classified into large corporations and small businesses. Private corporations, private institutions and universities are public members. It can be divided into two categories: the main applicant and the minor applicant. In the Maintenance Fee information issued by the USPTO, information on whether or not a Large Entity exists is given to the right holder, and in other countries, the number of patent applications or patents registered by the right holder / applicant is applied. . The division of a corporation, an institution, and a university can be identified by the organization type information included in the name of the applicant / holder (name = organization name + organization type). For example, name is Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Elelctronics becomes the organization name, and Co. Ltd. becomes the organization type. The right holder type ratio can be enterprise right holder / whole right holder, (enterprise + individual) / (institution + university). Self refers to the case where the owner of an individual patent is the same as the owner of a patent for patents (so-called Self Citation), and Non-Self refers only to the case where the owner of the patent is different from the owner of the patent.
On the other hand, since the number of notation items is too large, this abbreviated notation such as "A1, B1, D1, E1" A1 is the total number of patent holders in the patents, B1 is the total number of patent holders in the patent for the last n years, D1 is the patent holder's patentee, , The total number of patent holders and other patent holders, E1, is the number of patent claims divided by A1, B1, and D1. Thus, the abbreviated notation consists of "element part + range of reference part". In the above example, the element part becomes the "owner of the patents patented", and the scope part becomes the scope of the reference parts constituting the candidate for the conflict risk prediction element based on the patentee's patent right.
On the other hand, the patent classification is classified by the patent classification (IPC, USPC, FT, FI, ECLA), the level in the patent classification hierarchy (for example, IPC, subclass, main group, The competition risk prediction element candidate value may be generated for any one or two or more combinations of the use ranges of the patent classification. For example, if a patent contains both a USPC and an IPC, only the main patent classification is used. In the case of USPC, IPC is classified into three classes, namely subclass unit and main group unit, You will be able to generate candidate values. Dispute Risk Prediction Elements The same applies to the processing of a patent classification as far as candidate or conflict risk prediction elements are concerned.
There are four types of citation in the present invention. The first is direct citation, which corresponds to a quoted depth of 1. If there is a patent P2 in the reference (reference) information of patent P1, P2 becomes the parent of P1 and P1 becomes the child of P2. In this case, P2 is a direct citation of P1, and P1 is a direct citation of P2. The second is indirect citation, which is equivalent to citation depth 2 or higher. If there is P3 in the reference of P2, P3 is an indirect quotation of quotation depth 2 in P1. The third is latent citation. The fourth is chain citation. All kinds of quotations are divided into forward and backward. The Conflict Risk Prediction Element Value or the Conflict Risk Prediction Element Value for the various Conflict Risk Prediction Elements to the Conflict Risk Prediction Element Candidate as shown in Table 1 above are calculated for each of the four types of citation For example, a first kind of potential quotation, a second kind potential quotation, a first kind of chain quotation, a second kind of chain quotation, etc. Hereinafter, the same shall apply) Or may be generated by a method of simply adding one or more or summing up with a predetermined weight given according to the four kinds of citation. Of course, the conflict risk prediction element value to the conflict risk prediction element candidate value may be generated by separating the forward and backward components.
In addition, when a patent applicant who has a closely related relationship with his or her company (for example, an affiliate relationship, etc.) quotes a patent, it is called self citation. The self-citation may have a common denominator of itself and a reference, and the common denominator may include the applicant common, the inventor common, the patent classification common, and the like.
The cited patent set generation unit 1221 generates a cited patent set generation unit 1221 for the patented SSi by using a set of direct citation patents including at least one direct citation patent, a set of indirect citation including at least one indirect citation patent, A set of potential patents including at least one chain patent, and a set of chain quotations containing at least one chain patent.
Reference information related to the direct citation of the present invention includes 1) information given by the applicant or owner of Pi (applicant's reference), 2) information given by the examiner (reference to the examiner), 3) , And 4) those awarded by the examiners at the Pi examinations (for reference). The generation of the cited patent set of the cited patent set generation unit 1221 is generated by considering at least one of the above 1) to 4) types of indirect citation information, potential citation information, and chain citation information.
Third, there are many conflict inducers. The dispute inducer information is obtained by obtaining the patent dispute information and by applying various conditions such as a preset frequency or predetermined increase rate in relation to the right holder or plaintiff of the patent number contained in the patent dispute information One or more multi-disruptors can be extracted. A multi-dispute inducer who analyzes and generates dispute information is called a dispute-inducer of the first kind. On the other hand, a patent monster or an owner who has more than a predetermined number of patents in at least one patent pool or holds a patent that meets predetermined conditions (recent number, high growth rate) is called a second kind of conflict inducer. Among the patents, among the patents of the right holders, the patents of the patents determined by the entire patent portfolio or the specific period or conditions, the ratio of Reissue patents, multi-family patents, multi-family increasing patents, The right holder holding a patent group with a high proportion of high-speed patents is called a third party patent right.
From the viewpoint of the multi-dispute inducer, it is possible to exemplify a dispute risk prediction element candidate as shown in Table 3 below.
When there is a set of n patents, among the n patents, any one or more of the count value, the average value, and the predetermined function value of the patent which is the owner of the multi- . For example, if there is a patent family of 100 patents, then 10 can be a count value if the number of patents is AA, the multi-dispute inducer is the right holder. On the other hand, the smaller the population (n) is, even if there are 10 patents with the same multi-dispute inducer as the right holder, the larger the number of the dispute inducer includes the patent as the right holder. In other words, the density associated with multi-dispute inducers will increase, and the higher density will increase the likelihood that the patent family will be involved in the dispute. On the other hand, the density may be measured as an average value.
Furthermore, a patent group or predefined conditions (a specific period, a specific patent classification, or a specific query or other condition) generated by the entire patent of a multi-dispute inducer of the first, second, and / The candidate viewpoints may be generated for each of the patents satisfying the cited viewpoint.
Fourth, there exists a multi - dispute technology group in which litigation frequently occurs. Also, there exists a technology group that causes a lot of disputes based on the patent portfolio that the right holder owns, and a technology group which does not cause many disputes. The patent portfolio of the right holder is different in each technology group, and the subjective importance of the right holder may be different. The right holder may have two or more patents for two or more technology groups (for example, patent classification), and the patents included in each technology group of the same right holder may have different disputes, .
For example, in the US patent dispute information, IPC standards G06F and A61K among the patent classification of dispute patent have more patent disputes than other patent classification. The dispute inducing patent includes at least one patent classification of at least one kind or more, and processes the patent classification to extract at least one multi-dispute technology group. The multi-dispute technology group may be a patent classification included in IPC, USPC or other patent bibliography. On the other hand, according to the hierarchical structure of the patent classification system, it is possible to generate multi-disputing technique group information for various classes. For example, when there is a patent classification of H04B 7/26, the parents of H04B 7/26 (3 dot subgroup) are classified as H04B 7/24 (2dot Subgroup), H04B 7/00 (Main Group), H04B (Subclass), H04 (Class), and H (Section). Therefore, it is possible to extract at least one best patent classification from the n dot subgroup based on the patent classification of the disputed patent group for each class such as Main Group, Subclass, Class and so on. At this time, whether to extract the most-privileged patent classification only by the main classification or to extract the most-probable patent classification including the sub classification may vary depending on the setting of the system or the selection of the user. Of course, the depth of the patent classification hierarchy (IPC, n dot subgroup in Section, n dot subgroup in Class, USPC, etc.) Can vary.
From the viewpoint of the above multi-dispute technology group, candidate conflict risk prediction elements as shown in Table 4 below may be exemplarily shown.
Patent Classification Criteria Disputes Filed Patent Number,
Patent Classification Criteria Disputes filed,
Patent Classification Criteria Disputed Defendants,
Patent classification standard Dispute occurrence ratio,
Patent classification standard Dispute against total number of patents Number of patents
Patent classification standard Dispute ratio of total number of patents filed,
Patent classification standard Dispute ratio
Patented classification of patents owned by the right holder Patent dispute filed Patent number,
Right holders Patent group limited patent classification criteria Disputes filed,
The right holder holds patent group limited patent classification standard The number of the defendant defendant,
Patented classification of patents owned by right holders Patent classification standard Dispute occurrence ratio,
Patents owned by right holders Classification of limited patents Complaint dispute against total number of patents Number of patents
The right holder holds a limited number of patents.
Patents owned by the right holder Patent classification classification criteria Total number of patent disputes Defendant ratio
Right holder patent classification standard concentration rate,
Right holder patent classification activity rate,
Patent patent classification by the right holder H3
Average patent registration period per patent patent classification
In Table 4, the patent classification is classified according to the patent classification (eg, IPC, USPC, etc.), the patent classification depth (eg, IPC, class, subclass, main group, n dot subgroup, Or a combination of two or more. Meanwhile, in Table 4, the proprietor's limited patents classification standard refers to a conflict risk prediction element generated only for the patent classification included in the patent group held by the proprietor of the specific patent Pi. For example, if there is an A right holder holding m patents of the C1 patent classification and n patents of the C2 patent classification, the value of the conflict risk prediction element corresponding to B4 is divided into m and n. Of the m patents of the right holder A, two of the patents are disputed. Of the n patents, if there is one patent that has filed a dispute, the right holder of the right holder holds the patent group. The predictive element value is 2 for C1 and 1 for C2, and the value of the contention risk predictive element, that is, the ratio of the number of patent disputes to the total number of patents owned by the patent owner, is 2 / m And becomes 1 / n with respect to C2.
Next, generation of reaction variable values will be described. The value of the response variable is the disputed numerical value given to the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent from the point of time T1, which is the specific point, to the point of T2, which is the end point of the model. The disputed-numeric-
The disputed numerical
Table 5 below shows an exemplary configuration of the disputed numeric value
Table 6 below shows an exemplary configuration of disputed numeric value
If there is such a dispute numerical value assignment policy, the dispute numerical
If VPi is used in a case where a particular patent Pi has two litigation and one reexamination up to and including time T1 and T2, the disputed numerical value is 2.5. For non-disputed patents, a non-disputed numerical reference value is also assigned, where the disputed numerical value = non-disputed numerical reference value may be 0 for example. In this way, the disputed numerical value is generated for the model patent participating in the patent dispute risk measurement model. The generated disputed numerical value for each patent is stored in the disputed numerical value DB (1440).
In the event of multiple disputes, such as the occurrence of multiple disputes or the submission of a dispute, the same weighting process as above (dispute numerical value 2.5 is treated as a dispute and disputed numerical value is not assigned 1) Patent attributes are strongly reflected in patent dispute risk measurement models. The patent dispute risk metric model, which is treated differently from the disputed patent value, is treated differently from the patent dispute risk metric model, It becomes a good quality patent dispute risk measurement model that reflects the importance of the patent.
FIG. 4 illustrates another method for reflecting the above-mentioned multi-dispute patent in the patent dispute risk measurement model.
The patent dispute risk
In the above, the disputed patent value is 2.5 for the disputed patent and the disputed numeric value is 0 for the non-disputed patent, but the patent dispute sampling for the creation of the patent dispute risk measurement model is duplicated do. In this case, you could do double sampling, or round up to triple. In other words, the patent dispute is duplicated twice or three times in the same dispute, which is reflected in the patent dispute risk measurement model. In other words, since the attributes of a patent contained in a multi-dispute patent and the attributes included in a dispute patent are treated differently, the patent dispute risk metric model generated through this process is used to determine the importance of the patent dispute risk metric model It will become a good quality patent dispute risk measurement model effectively reflected.
Sampling may be required to create a patent dispute risk metering model. Sampling samples the disputed patent against the entire set of disputed patents and samples the non disputed patent from the entire non-disputed patent set. One example of sampling is to sample the entire patent disputed from time T1 to time T1 and to sample the non-disputing patent by sampling stratified by the sampled dispute patent. It is possible to consider the patent classification of the sampled patent, the patent registration year, and the like as a criterion used in stratified extraction.
Through the above process, the disputed numerical value according to the obtained patent dispute patent (S11) and the disputed patent dispute information (S12) are generated (S13). And non-disputed numerical threshold values are granted for non-disputed patents. The reaction variable
Then, the patent dispute risk
The statistical technique may use a modeling technique. The modeling technique can use either boosting, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), C5.0, Decision Tree, or the like.
In order for the modeling result of the patent dispute risk
As a result of the modeling of the patent dispute risk
A patent dispute risk metering model is created, and the parameter values are regenerated for all patents based on the T2 point or the current point of use (Tu point of use) for actual use. The generated parameter value is stored in the patent dispute risk measurement model value
The generated patent dispute risk metric model value is provided to the user through DBMS or search engine search, and the function is provided by the patent dispute risk metric model
Next, the number of independent defendants and the number of independent defendants used in generating the disputed numerical value will be described. Assume that the plaintiff is a plaintiff AAA in a particular patent suit in which patent Pi is used, and defendants are Apple, Samsung Electronics, Samsung Electronics America, Hyundai Motors, and Hyundai Motors Alabama. In this case, the defendant in the form of five cases, but the actual case is AAA vs.. Apple, AAA, etc. Samsung Electronics, AAA etc. There are three Hyundai Motors. At this time, the plaintiff can file a complaint with a number of defendants in one litigation, but can also file a complaint by individual litigation. At this time, it may be inappropriate to set the number of cases Pi to 1 in the former case and to 3 in the latter case. In addition, it may not be feasible to set the number of litigation to five in the former case.
Accordingly, the disputed-numeric-
On the other hand, the disputed numerical value may be differently assigned to the technical group, the state group, the industrial group, the time group, the owner property group, and the party attribute group to which the dispute patent belongs. For example, patent disputes are frequent, or disputes are increasing rapidly (based on the IPC, USPC, and CPC criteria, the number of disputes or disputes is handled and utilized based on a specific depth in the hierarchy of these patent categories) In the case of patents belonging to the patent, the disputed numerical value of a specific patent Pj may be adjusted in such a manner that a certain point or weight is additionally given. The same may be true if the applicant or current owner of Pj is a right holder belonging to a particular country, or if it has a specific holder attribute (eg NPE). On the other hand, if industry groups can be assigned based on PJ's IPC, USPC, and CPC, they may assign different disputed numerical values to patent Pj belonging to a specific industry group.
The patent dispute risk metric
The present invention can be widely used in the patent information industry and the patent consulting industry.
1000: Patent dispute risk metering information processing system
1100: Patent dispute risk measurement modeling engine
1110: Description variable value get module
1120: Reaction variable value acquisition module
1130: Disputed numerical value generation module
1140: Patent dispute risk measurement modeling module
1150: Patent dispute risk measurement model verification module
1200: Patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module
1300: Patent Dispute Risk Measurement Model Value Providing Module
1400: Data DB for patent dispute risk measurement model
1410: Parametric DB for patent dispute risk modeling
1420: Parameter DB for creating patent dispute risk measurement model value
1430: Patent dispute risk measurement model value DB
1440: Disputed numerical value DB
1450: dispute numerical value grant policy DB
1500: Patent DB
1510: Patent original text DB
1520: Patent classification DB
1530: Patent Transaction DB
1540: Patent dispute DB
1550: Patent right holder DB
1560: NPE DB
Claims (40)
(A) obtaining a set of disputed patents consisting of at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents;
(B) obtaining dispute information related to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set;
(C) granting the disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set; and
(D) For a non-disputed patented set of at least two non-disputing patents to which the disputed numerical value is assigned and the disputed numerical value is given as a non-disputed numerical reference value, the disputed numerical value and the non- And establishing at least one patent dispute risk measurement model using statistical techniques using the explanatory variable values of at least two or more explanatory variables for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent, ,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
Wherein the type of the disputed numerical value is different for each of the disputed patents.
(E) granting a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputing patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model. A method of processing information in a processing system.
The quasi-litigation patent is one or more of the patents used in the trial or reexam,
Wherein the patent litigation patent is at least one of a patent used in a court of competent jurisdiction or a patent litigation filed in an administrative jurisdiction.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the number of disputes in the dispute patent, the point of dispute, the type of dispute, the number of defendants, and the defendant number in the patent dispute risk metering information processing system.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used.
Wherein the number of independent defendants is the number of defendants who do not share the longest same string in the defendant's name.
The set of disputed patents obtained in the step (A) is a subset of the entire disputed patent set,
The non-disputed patent set in step (D) is a subset of the entire non-disputed patent set,
Wherein the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set have at least one shared attribute.
The shared attribute is a point-in-time share,
Wherein the response variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The reaction variable value is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable value is generated based on the model starting time point to the specific time point.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of a technical group, a state group, an industrial group, a time group, a right holder attribute group, and a party attribute group to which the dispute patent belongs. A method of processing information in a processing system.
A patent dispute risk metric modeling engine that performs the function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling;
A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model;
The patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, and the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the data generated by the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, A model DB unit,
The patent dispute risk measurement model receives the disputed patent assertion and sets the disputed numerical value given to the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent as the response variable. The patent dispute risk measurement model includes at least two explanatory variables It is generated using statistical techniques using variable values,
The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module assigns a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and an attribute group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used.
Wherein the reaction variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The reaction variable value is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable values are generated based on the model starting time point to the specific time point.
(F) obtaining a set of disputed patents consisting of at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents;
(G) obtaining dispute information relating to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set;
(H) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set;
(I) weighted sampling of the disputed patent in the set of disputed patented disputed numerical values;
(J) sampling a non-disputed patent in a non-disputed patent aggregation for which no disputed numerical value has been assigned; and
(K) performing statistical modeling using the weighted sampled disputed patent and the non-disputed patent,
For the statistical model, for a non-disputed patent set consisting of at least two non-disputing patents granted with the disputed numerical value and weighted sampled disputed patent and a non-disputed numerical reference value, And a statistical technique is applied to the disputed patent and the non-disputing patent by using at least two explanatory variables for each explanatory variable to establish at least one patent dispute risk measurement model Lt; / RTI &
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
Wherein the type of the disputed numerical value is different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the weighted sampling is generated using the disputed numeric value. ≪ RTI ID = 0.0 > [10] < / RTI >
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the number of disputes in the dispute patent, the point of dispute, the type of dispute, the number of defendants, and the defendant number in the patent dispute risk metering information processing system.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the independent defendant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used.
Wherein the disputed numeric value is a number of disputes of a predetermined time period.
The disputed patent set is a subset of the entire disputed patent set,
The non-disputed patent aggregation is a subset of the entire non-disputing patent aggregation,
Wherein the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set have at least one shared attribute.
The shared attribute is a point-in-time share,
Wherein the response variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The reaction variable value is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable value is generated based on the model starting time point to the specific time point.
(L) assigning a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the dispute patent and the population patent to which the non-dispute patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model. A method of processing information in a processing system.
A patent dispute risk metric modeling engine that performs the function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling;
A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model;
The patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, and the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the data generated by the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, A model DB unit,
The patent dispute risk measurement model receives the disputed patent set, weight-samples the disputed patent contained in the disputed patent set in consideration of the disputed numerical value, and compares the disputed patent grant value A non-disputed patent grant value given to the sampled non-disputing patent as a response variable, and a non-disputed patent created using statistical techniques using at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent Lt; / RTI &
The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module assigns a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and an attribute group of the patent right of the disputed patent.
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the independent defendant number information and the disputant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the patent is used. .
The shared property of the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set is a point-
Wherein the reaction variable value and the explanatory variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The reaction variable value is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable values are generated based on the model starting time point to the specific time point.
(M) obtaining a set of disputed patents consisting of at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents;
(N) obtaining dispute information related to the disputed patent from the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set;
(O) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set; and
(P) For a non-disputed patented set of at least two non-disputing patents to which the disputed numerical value is assigned and the disputed numerical value is given as a non-disputed numerical reference value, the disputed numerical value and the non- And establishing at least one patent dispute risk metering model using the statistical technique using the explanatory variable values for at least two or more explanatory variables for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent, Information processing,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the reaction variable value is generated based on the time from a specific time point to a model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
A patent dispute risk metric modeling engine that performs the function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling;
A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model;
The patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, and the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the data generated by the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, A model DB unit,
The patent dispute risk measurement model receives the disputed patent assertion and sets the disputed numerical value given to the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent as the response variable. The patent dispute risk measurement model includes at least two explanatory variables It is generated using statistical techniques using variable values,
The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module assigns a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
The shared property of the disputed patent set and the non-disputed patent set is a point-
Wherein the response variable value and the description variable value are generated based on the specific time point.
The reaction variable value is generated based on the time from the specific time point to the model termination time point,
Wherein the explanatory variable value is generated based on the time from the model start time to the specific time point.
Wherein the disputed numeric value is generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and an attribute group of the patent right of the disputed patent. Lt; / RTI >
(Q) obtaining a set of disputed patents consisting of at least two litigated and semi-litigious patents;
(R) obtaining dispute information relating to the disputed patent for the disputed patent constituting the disputed patent set;
(S) granting a disputed numerical value to the disputed patent belonging to the disputed patent set;
(T) weighted sampling of the disputed patent in the set of disputed patented disputed numerical values;
(U) sampling a non-disputed patent in a non-disputed patent aggregation not assigned a disputed numerical value; and
(V) performing statistical modeling using the weighted sampled disputed patent and a non-disputed patent; and
For the statistical model, for a non-disputed patent set consisting of at least two non-disputing patents granted with the disputed numerical value and weighted sampled disputed patent and a non-disputed numerical reference value, And a statistical technique is applied to the disputed patent and the non-disputing patent by using at least two explanatory variables for each explanatory variable to establish at least one patent dispute risk measurement model Lt; / RTI &
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the weighted sampling is generated using the disputed numeric value. ≪ Desc / Clms Page number 24 >
A patent dispute risk metric modeling engine that performs the function of generating at least one patent dispute risk metering model through patent dispute risk metering modeling;
A patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module for generating a patent dispute risk measurement model value using the patent dispute risk measurement model;
The patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, and the patent dispute risk metering modeling engine and the data generated by the patent dispute risk metering model value generation module, A model DB unit,
The patent dispute risk measurement model receives the disputed patent set, weight-samples the disputed patent contained in the disputed patent set in consideration of the disputed numerical value, and compares the disputed patent grant value A non-disputed patent grant value given to the sampled non-disputing patent as a response variable, and a non-disputed patent created using statistical techniques using at least two explanatory variable values for the disputed patent and the non-disputed patent Lt; / RTI &
The patent dispute risk measurement model value generation module assigns a patent dispute risk measurement model value to the disputed patent and the population patent to which the non-disputed patent belongs using the patent dispute risk measurement model,
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing the dispute information,
The dispute information includes at least one of dispute occurrence information and disputant party information
And the type of the disputed numerical value may be different for each of the disputed patents.
Wherein the disputed numeric value is generated by processing at least one of a dispute attribute point of view of the dispute patent, a technology group point of view of the disputed patent, and an attribute group of the patent right of the disputed patent. Lt; / RTI >
Wherein the disputed numerical value is generated by processing at least one of the independent defendant number information and the disputant number information in a dispute occurring in a predetermined time period during which the disputed patent was used. Recorded recording medium.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020130166642A KR20150077796A (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2013-12-30 | System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification |
| PCT/KR2014/004885 WO2015102174A1 (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2014-06-02 | System for processing patent dispute risk measurement information and information processing method for system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020130166642A KR20150077796A (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2013-12-30 | System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20150077796A true KR20150077796A (en) | 2015-07-08 |
Family
ID=53493505
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020130166642A KR20150077796A (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2013-12-30 | System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20150077796A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2015102174A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20100124152A (en) * | 2009-05-18 | 2010-11-26 | (주) 아이피아이 | Patent dispute forecasting system and method thereof |
| KR101160995B1 (en) * | 2009-08-17 | 2012-07-02 | 사단법인 한국전자정보통신산업진흥회 | Apparatus and method for forecasting patent trouble |
| KR101255181B1 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2013-04-16 | 강민수 | System, Media and Method on Making Patent Litigation Prediction Model |
| KR101199827B1 (en) * | 2011-03-23 | 2012-11-09 | 강민수 | System, Media, Program and Method on Making Patent Litigation Prediction Model |
| KR20130125119A (en) * | 2012-05-08 | 2013-11-18 | (주) 아이피아이 | Patent evaluation and forecasting system and method thereof |
-
2013
- 2013-12-30 KR KR1020130166642A patent/KR20150077796A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2014
- 2014-06-02 WO PCT/KR2014/004885 patent/WO2015102174A1/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2015102174A1 (en) | 2015-07-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR101333074B1 (en) | Method, System and Media on Making Patent Evalucation Model and Patent Evaluation | |
| Rehman et al. | Intellectual capital performance and its impact on corporate performance: An empirical evidence from MODARABA sector of Pakistan. | |
| US20180247078A1 (en) | System for anonymization and filtering of data | |
| Patwardhan et al. | A critical analysis of the ‘UGC-approved list of journals’ | |
| Javanmardi et al. | Modeling user reputation in wikis | |
| US20140250112A1 (en) | Systems and methods using reputation or influence scores in search queries | |
| Atal et al. | Patent quality and a two‐tiered patent system | |
| Czarnitzki et al. | Individual versus institutional ownership of university-discovered inventions | |
| Hu et al. | CPA firm’s cloud auditing provider for performance evaluation and improvement: an empirical case of China | |
| Ribeiro et al. | The time for a new arbitration law in China: Comparing the arbitration law in China with the UNCITRAL model law | |
| Nasseh et al. | Pricing in commercial dental insurance and provider markets | |
| KR20150077796A (en) | System and Method on Patent Litigation Risk Quantification | |
| KR101658890B1 (en) | Method for online evaluating patents | |
| Bavli | Aggregating for accuracy: a closer look at sampling and accuracy in class action litigation | |
| KR101199827B1 (en) | System, Media, Program and Method on Making Patent Litigation Prediction Model | |
| US20170323305A1 (en) | Mechanism for securing legal interactions | |
| Bregiannis et al. | Workers in the gig economy | |
| KR101771634B1 (en) | System, Media, Program and Method on Generating Patent Licensing Prediction Information | |
| KR101255181B1 (en) | System, Media and Method on Making Patent Litigation Prediction Model | |
| KR101271115B1 (en) | System, Media, Program and Method on Generating Patent Risk Hedging Prediction Information | |
| Drahozal | The state of empirical research on international commercial arbitration: 10 years later | |
| Hutt | Anything but Prideful: Free Speech and Conversion Therapy Bans, State-Federal Action Plans, and Rooting out Medical Fraud | |
| KR20140078969A (en) | Patent Information System and its Patent Information Providing Method Including Information on Patent Troll | |
| Sahu et al. | Growth of Open Access Law Research Articles seen through DOAJ: A Bibliometric Analysis. | |
| KR101456190B1 (en) | Method for verifying evaluation engine of patent evaluation system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A201 | Request for examination | ||
| E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
| E601 | Decision to refuse application |