KR20140054533A - System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof - Google Patents
System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20140054533A KR20140054533A KR1020120120117A KR20120120117A KR20140054533A KR 20140054533 A KR20140054533 A KR 20140054533A KR 1020120120117 A KR1020120120117 A KR 1020120120117A KR 20120120117 A KR20120120117 A KR 20120120117A KR 20140054533 A KR20140054533 A KR 20140054533A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- inspection
- request
- management unit
- agricultural products
- agricultural product
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
- G06F3/0484—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] for the control of specific functions or operations, e.g. selecting or manipulating an object, an image or a displayed text element, setting a parameter value or selecting a range
- G06F3/0486—Drag-and-drop
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/018—Certifying business or products
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Mining
Abstract
Description
The present invention relates to inspection of agricultural products, and more particularly, to a system and method for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management.
Recently, as the market has been liberalized, imports of agricultural products have increased rapidly, and consumers' preference for high quality and safe agricultural products has increased. In particular, the safety of agricultural products is an important determinant when purchasing agricultural products, which has a great impact on agriculture and the food industry.
In order to provide agricultural producers with safe agricultural products, it is necessary to comprehensively manage factors that may cause food safety problems such as contaminated water or soil, pesticides, heavy metals and harmful organisms (microorganisms) in the process of production and simple processing of agricultural products A series of systems is called Good Agricultural Practices (GAP).
Domestically, the Agricultural Products Excellence Management System has established a system to certify agricultural products by appointing a private institution with a certain qualification from the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as a certification body.
In addition, internationally, GAP has been widely accepted as a general guideline for agricultural safety. In particular, the European Union (EU) has developed GAP for safe and fresh fruits or vegetables that meet consumer needs and calls it Global GAP.
On the other hand, it can be said that the use of pesticides in GAP is based on complying with the safe use standard of pesticides. The safe use standard of pesticides refers to the criteria for limiting the number of pesticide spraying and the final spraying period (days) before harvesting, so that the residual amount of pesticides in the harvested agricultural products does not exceed the residual permissible level.
Currently, government and private efforts are continuing to develop such GAP into a certification system in which many farmers participate. In other words, the producer (sponsor) must make a certification request to be certified as an excellent agricultural product, and the inspector should perform pesticide or microbial inspection on the commodity requested. In addition, the administrator shall be able to supervise and supervise the inspectors.
However, it is difficult for an administrator to organically link producers and inspectors and effectively manage the inspectors in order to secure consumer confidence. In addition, it is difficult to immediately reflect the change in the authentication procedure or inspection standard.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide an agricultural product inspection system that provides a user interface for effectively performing inspection on agricultural products based on a business process.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an agricultural product inspection method for efficiently performing an inspection on agricultural products based on a business process.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an agricultural product inspection system including a commissioning unit for requesting an inspection for agricultural products by receiving an inspection request for agricultural products, an inspection unit for inspecting agricultural products at the request of the commissioning unit, A process manager for designating an inspector to request inspection by a designated inspector, and a inspection manager for assigning inspection for agricultural products to a designated inspector at the request of the process manager.
Here, the request management section can receive and manage the information about the farmhouse requesting the inspection of agricultural products.
Here, the process management section may provide information on the designated examiner to the commissioning section.
Here, the process management unit may provide an inspection standard for agricultural products to the request management unit or the inspection management unit at the request of the request management unit or the inspection management unit.
Here, the process management unit may include a process authoring tool for authoring an inspection process for agricultural products.
Here, the process authoring tool may modify the inspection process for the agricultural product by adding or adjusting components constituting the inspection process for agricultural products through a drag-and-drop method .
Here, the inspection management unit may receive the inspection result of the agricultural product performed by the designated inspector and provide the inspection result to the request management unit or the process management unit.
Here, the inspection result of the agricultural product can be calculated by examining at least one of residual pesticide, heavy metal and microorganism.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for inspecting agricultural products, comprising the steps of: receiving an inspection request for agricultural products from a farmer and requesting inspection for agricultural products; Designating an inspector to check a possible inspector, requesting inspection by a designated inspector, and assigning inspection for agricultural products to a designated inspector in accordance with a inspection request by a designated inspector.
Here, the step of requesting the inspection of the agricultural products may receive and manage the information about the farmhouse.
Here, the step of requesting inspection by the designated tester may provide information on the tester designated to the farmhouse.
Here, the step of assigning the inspection for the agricultural product may receive the inspection result of the agricultural product performed by the designated inspector and provide the inspection result to the farmer or the external system.
Here, the inspection result of the agricultural product can be calculated by examining at least one of residual pesticide, heavy metal and microorganism.
In the case of using the agricultural product inspection system and method according to the embodiment of the present invention as described above, the farmer (requester) can access the agricultural product inspection system and can easily request the inspection of the agricultural products. If there is, it can be checked and processed in real time. The inspector can perform his / her work effectively by performing the inspection of the agricultural products according to the inspection request for the agricultural products assigned to him and inputting the inspection results of the agricultural products .
In addition, the administrator can modify the inspection process for agricultural products in accordance with the needs of the administrator or in accordance with changes in legislation.
In addition, the agricultural product inspection system and method can be effectively applied to GAP or Global GAP.
1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an agricultural product inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a flowchart illustrating a process performed by an agricultural product inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a conceptual diagram for explaining the authoring of a process for inspection of agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 is an exemplary diagram for explaining an inspection request for agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention.
5 is an exemplary diagram for explaining inspection results of agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention.
6 is a flowchart illustrating an agricultural product inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments, but includes all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention. Like reference numerals are used for like elements in describing each drawing.
The terms first, second, A, B, etc. may be used to describe various elements, but the elements should not be limited by the terms. The terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another. For example, without departing from the scope of the present invention, the first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be referred to as a first component. And / or < / RTI > includes any combination of a plurality of related listed items or any of a plurality of related listed items.
It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" or "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected or connected to the other element, . On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" or "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between.
The terminology used in this application is used only to describe a specific embodiment and is not intended to limit the invention. The singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In the present application, the terms "comprises" or "having" and the like are used to specify that there is a feature, a number, a step, an operation, an element, a component or a combination thereof described in the specification, But do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, or combinations thereof.
Unless defined otherwise, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Terms such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries are to be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with the contextual meaning of the related art and are to be interpreted as either ideal or overly formal in the sense of the present application Do not.
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an agricultural product inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, an agricultural
The agricultural
BPM is a technique that increases the efficiency of work by automating the execution of the main business processes of the organization through the information system. In addition, BPMS can provide a variety of functions to automate business processes as well as to intervene in the process of the process, control its execution, monitor progress, and analyze progress.
In the present invention, a user using the agricultural
A farmer (or a requester) who produces agricultural products can access the agricultural
The manager who manages the inspection of the agricultural products can confirm the inspected inspection through the agricultural product inspection system (10), and can designate the inspector who can perform the inspection for the agricultural product and request the inspection.
In addition, an inspector who inspects agricultural products can perform inspections on agricultural products through the agricultural product inspection system (10), and provide inspection results to the requester or the manager.
The
The farmer can input information about the farmhouse, information on agricultural products to be inspected, etc. through the
The
Also, the
The
The inspector testing the agricultural products can receive the inspection for the agricultural products through the inspection and
2 is a flowchart illustrating a process performed by an agricultural product inspection system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 2, the
The
The
Here, the inspection criterion may refer to a criterion based on the kind of the agricultural product or the inspection item. In addition, the inspection standard may include national standards and international standards. For example, domestic standards may refer to the standards provided by the Food and Drug Administration, and international standards may be defined by the International Food Standards Committee (CAC), which is jointly run by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAQ) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (Codex) for the purpose of promoting international trade and protecting consumers' health.
The
In addition, the
Here, the external system may be a
In addition, the agricultural
Therefore, the consumer can access the
The agricultural
The
3 is a conceptual diagram for explaining the authoring of a process for inspection of agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 3, an administrator can author an inspection process for an agricultural product using the
The inspection process for agricultural products may need to be changed according to the needs of the manager or according to changes in the legal system. In this case, the administrator can modify the inspection process for agricultural products by adding or adjusting components that make up the inspection process for agricultural products.
Accordingly, the
For example, when an agricultural product inspection process is started (S310), a farmer's inspection request is received (S320), and the
Here, it is possible to add a procedure (S335) for confirming whether or not the agricultural product is an object of inspection and approving the inspection, instead of requesting the inspection by always designating the inspector in accordance with the inspection request according to the inspection request.
Therefore, the administrator can modify the inspection process for the agricultural products according to the needs of the manager or in accordance with the change of the legal system.
The present invention can be embodied as a computer-readable program or code on a computer-readable recording medium. A computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of recording apparatuses in which data that can be read by a computer system is stored. The computer-readable recording medium may also be distributed and distributed in a networked computer system so that a computer-readable program or code can be stored and executed in a distributed manner.
Meanwhile, the present invention is provided in an open source form and can be modified or expanded according to the needs of the user.
FIG. 4 is an exemplary view for explaining an inspection request for agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 5 is an exemplary view for explaining inspection results of agricultural products according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 4, the farmer (requester) can input information about the farmhouse, information about the farm, and information about the agricultural products to be inspected through the
In addition, the farmer can receive an outdated ID through subscription through the
Referring to FIG. 5, the inspector can perform inspection on the basis of inspection for agricultural products, and input inspection results of agricultural products through the inspection and
The inspector can indicate whether the agricultural product on which the inspection is performed is appropriate based on the inspection standard. That is, the inspection result of agricultural products can display the standard value and the inspection result for each inspection item, and it can indicate whether or not each inspection item is passed.
In addition to the contents shown in FIG. 5, it is possible to additionally add test result items that require labeling according to a consumer's demand or legal regulations, and may include information on the farmers who produce the agricultural products.
Therefore, the agricultural
6 is a flowchart illustrating an agricultural product inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
6, an agricultural product inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention includes receiving an inspection request for an agricultural product from a farmer, requesting inspection of the agricultural product, requesting inspection of the agricultural product, To request an inspection by the designated inspector, and to assign the inspection for the agricultural product to the designated inspector in response to the inspection request by the designated inspector.
The farmer may apply for an inspection request for agricultural products requiring inspection (S610) and request inspection of agricultural products (S620). Farmers can request inspection of residual agricultural chemicals, heavy metals or microorganisms on agricultural products. For example, a farmer can apply for an inspection request for agricultural products by inputting information about farmers, information on agricultural products to be inspected, and the like.
The manager can check inspection orders for agricultural products in real time. If there is an inspection request for an agricultural product, the manager may designate an inspector capable of inspecting agricultural products requested for inspection (S630) and request inspection by the designated inspector (S640). The manager can identify the inspectors who can inspect the agricultural products at the request of the farmer and can request the inspection by the designated inspectors.
The inspector can be assigned an inspection of the agricultural product (S650). In addition, the inspector can provide the farmer or manager with the results of the inspection on the agricultural products. That is, the inspector can check the inspection standard and provide the result of the inspection to the farmer or the manager.
Therefore, the farmer can access the agricultural
The agricultural product inspection method according to the embodiment of the present invention can be implemented by the agricultural
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims It can be understood that
10: agricultural products inspection system 20: quality management system
100: a request management unit 200: a process management unit
300:
Claims (13)
A process management unit for identifying an inspector who is capable of inspecting the agricultural produce according to a request of the request management unit and designating an inspector and requesting inspection by the designated inspector; And
And a test management unit for assigning a test for the agricultural product to the designated tester according to a request of the process management unit.
And receives and manages information about farmers requesting inspection of the agricultural products.
And provides information on the designated inspectors to the commissioning management unit.
And provides the inspection management unit or the inspection management unit with an inspection standard for the agricultural product in response to a request from the request management unit or the inspection management unit.
And a process authoring tool for authoring an inspection process for the agricultural product.
Wherein the inspection process for the agricultural product is modified by adding or adjusting a component constituting the inspection process for the agricultural product through a drag-and-drop method.
Wherein the control unit receives the inspection result of the agricultural product performed by the designated inspector and provides the inspection result to the request management unit or the process management unit.
Wherein at least one of the residual agricultural chemicals, heavy metals, and microorganisms is inspected.
Identifying an inspector capable of inspecting the agricultural product according to an inspection request for the agricultural product, designating the inspector, and requesting inspection by the designated inspector; And
And assigning a test for the agricultural product to the designated tester according to an inspection request by the designated tester.
Wherein the information about the farmhouse is received and managed.
And providing the farmer with information on the designated inspectors.
Wherein the inspection result of the agricultural product performed by the designated inspector is received and provided to the farmer or the external system.
Wherein at least one of the residual agricultural chemicals, heavy metals, and microorganisms is inspected.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020120120117A KR20140054533A (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2012-10-29 | System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020120120117A KR20140054533A (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2012-10-29 | System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20140054533A true KR20140054533A (en) | 2014-05-09 |
Family
ID=50886370
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020120120117A KR20140054533A (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2012-10-29 | System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20140054533A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20170051922A (en) * | 2015-11-03 | 2017-05-12 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A medical apparatus, a system for controlling a request for medical observation and a program recorded in a medium |
-
2012
- 2012-10-29 KR KR1020120120117A patent/KR20140054533A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20170051922A (en) * | 2015-11-03 | 2017-05-12 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A medical apparatus, a system for controlling a request for medical observation and a program recorded in a medium |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lammerding | An overview of microbial food safety risk assessment | |
Jespersen et al. | Comparative analysis of existing food safety culture evaluation systems | |
Wallace et al. | HACCP–the difficulty with hazard analysis | |
Manning et al. | Quality assurance models in the food supply chain | |
Aiassa et al. | Applicability and feasibility of systematic review for performing evidence-based risk assessment in food and feed safety | |
Castka et al. | Audits and COVID-19: A paradigm shift in the making | |
Pham et al. | Supply chain risk management research in construction: a systematic review | |
Shevchenko et al. | Preventing supplier non-conformance: Extending the agency theory perspective | |
Tuominen et al. | Trapping the food safety performance of a small or medium-sized food company using a risk-based model. The HYGRAM® system | |
Brackett et al. | Validation and Verification: A Practical, Industry-driven Framework Developed to Support the Requirements of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) of 2011. | |
Stärk et al. | The value of information: current challenges in surveillance implementation | |
Manning | Food safety and brand equity | |
Mumford et al. | Disentangling quality and safety indicator data: a longitudinal, comparative study of hand hygiene compliance and accreditation outcomes in 96 Australian hospitals | |
Kharub et al. | The application of quality tools in effective implementation of HACCP: An empirical study of food and pharmaceutical industries | |
Rachman et al. | Implementation of lean knowledge work in oil and gas industry-A case study from a Risk-Based Inspection project | |
Focker et al. | Designing a risk-based monitoring plan for pathogens in food: A review | |
Cho et al. | Exploring latent factors influencing the adoption of a processed food traceability system in South Korea | |
Armbruster et al. | Informatics to Support International Food Safety. | |
Vangay et al. | Classification of Listeria monocytogenes persistence in retail delicatessen environments using expert elicitation and machine learning | |
KR20140054533A (en) | System for inspecting agricultural products based on business process management and method thereof | |
Baker et al. | Framework for managing mycotoxin risks in the food industry | |
Starbird | Testing errors, supplier segregation, and food safety | |
Humphrey | Regulation, standards and risk management in the context of globalization | |
Zainuddin et al. | Implementation of The Retail Halal Control Points: Assessment Leading to Sustainable Competitiveness in Cottage Food Businesses During Post-Pandemic Recovery | |
Lachapelle et al. | Expert elicitation to estimate the feed safety impact of criteria included in the Canadian Food Inspection Agency risk assessment model for feed mills |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E601 | Decision to refuse application |