KR20130095387A - The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof - Google Patents

The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20130095387A
KR20130095387A KR1020120016760A KR20120016760A KR20130095387A KR 20130095387 A KR20130095387 A KR 20130095387A KR 1020120016760 A KR1020120016760 A KR 1020120016760A KR 20120016760 A KR20120016760 A KR 20120016760A KR 20130095387 A KR20130095387 A KR 20130095387A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
analysis
student
preference
item
processing means
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020120016760A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
김경현
Original Assignee
김경현
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 김경현 filed Critical 김경현
Priority to KR1020120016760A priority Critical patent/KR20130095387A/en
Publication of KR20130095387A publication Critical patent/KR20130095387A/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/20Education
    • G06Q50/205Education administration or guidance

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention, the analysis screen processing means; Analysis execution means; Analysis result processing means; And an analysis preparation means, wherein the analysis screen processing means provides a frame for generating and placing a group; The analyzing executing means allows the observer to select or input an analysis item by using the frame in which the group is arranged; Analysis result processing means relates to the student preference analysis system, characterized in that to present the number and time of each analysis item in a graph and matrix table.

Description

The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium

The present invention, the analysis screen processing means; Analysis execution means; Analysis result processing means; And an analysis preparation means, wherein the analysis screen processing means provides a frame for generating and placing a group; The analyzing executing means allows the observer to select or input an analysis item by using the frame in which the group is arranged; Analysis result processing means relates to the student preference analysis system, characterized in that to present the number and time of each analysis item in a graph and matrix table.

Classes are at the heart of educational activities, and it is natural and important to evaluate and analyze classes to improve the quality of instruction.

In general, class evaluation is conducted through observation, analysis, and evaluation of classes. Particularly, the reason for observation is that classrooms have communication situations between teachers and students, various tasks and events coexist, and they affect each other. This is because the speed is not too fast.

However, in the conventional class evaluation, the observer (scholar, principal, vice principal, fellow teacher, etc.) observes and evaluates the class once in the field, so that the teacher feels a considerable burden in preparing the class and the observer and the teacher have enough The proceedings were not agreed.

In other words, in the conventional evaluation method, the observer and teacher face to head and ponder the evaluation result, and thus, the preconditions for contributing to the improvement of the quality of the class could not be satisfied.

Therefore, in order for the observation, analysis, and evaluation process of the class to be successful, the observation and analysis of the class should not only be completed by one-time observation, but also by the observer and the teacher on the items to be evaluated and the evaluation criteria for the items. By being fully reflected in the class, the quality of the class can be ultimately improved.

Meanwhile, as a criterion for evaluating lessons, researches on analyzing teacher's preference tendency have been conducted.

Here, preference is implied to give constraints or preferences to specific objects without giving equal opportunities to everyone, rather than personal tastes.

Of course, the teacher will not intentionally prefer a particular student consistently, but regardless of the will, there will be some form of preference for the student or group, and if this is concentrated over a long period of time, it can develop into personal preference.

For example, when asking questions to induce creative thinking, low-level students may not be able to answer properly or may disturb the class atmosphere. One, but there is the possibility of becoming habitual.

Therefore, there is a need for a method to improve the quality of instruction by systematically organizing and analyzing information on preferences that can occur regardless of the intention of the teacher.

In addition, by reflecting computer information processing technology in the student preference analysis, it is possible to relieve the teacher's evaluation burden by modifying the evaluation analysis items and present the results of the analysis in a variety of ways by performing observations in class videos rather than directly in the field. We need a student preference analysis system.

Overall, the analyst and the teacher decide the items to analyze the student's preferences together, and the students can improve the quality of the class by conducting the actual student preference analysis by integrating the computer information processing technology. Preference analysis system is desperately needed.

The following briefly reviews prior arts developed in relation to class evaluation.

First, the Republic of Korea Patent Publication No. 10-0522728 relates to a system that can evaluate the learner's fidelity, which is characterized by managing the learner to learn faithfully by proceeding the learner's prior learning evaluation and post-learning results evaluation have.

This is positive about the processing of learner's learning evaluation using computer information processing technology, but it does not describe the teacher's student preference analysis.

Secondly, Republic of Korea Patent Publication No. 10-0833097 relates to a method and system for evaluating educators, characterized in that the trainees score the results of evaluating the educators to process using the statistics.

This is positive about the indirect evaluation of instruction by evaluating educators, but it does not describe the analysis of teacher's student preferences.

The purpose of the present invention is to analyze items for analyzing student preferences together with an analyst and a teacher, and consider them together, and by combining computer information processing technology, actual student preference analysis can be performed to improve the quality of instruction. To provide a student preference analysis system.

The present invention, the analysis screen processing means; Analysis execution means; Analysis result processing means; And an analysis preparation means, wherein the analysis screen processing means provides a frame for generating and placing a group; The analyzing executing means allows the observer to select or input an analysis item by using the frame in which the group is arranged; Analysis result processing means is to solve the technical problem by providing a student preference analysis system, characterized in that to present the number and time of each analysis item in a graph and matrix table.

According to the present invention, an analyst and a teacher consider items to analyze student preferences sufficiently, and by combining computer information processing technology with them, actual student preference analysis is performed to improve the quality of instruction. Has the effect.

1 is a main configuration of a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an analysis screen of a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a diagram illustrating an example of performing a class analysis project using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 to 6 are diagrams illustrating an example of changing and generating an analysis item template using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
7 to 11 are diagrams showing an example of generating a group using the student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
12 is a diagram illustrating an example of performing an analysis using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
13 to 20 are diagrams illustrating an example of processing and presenting a preference analysis result using a student preference analysis system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

The terms and words used in the present specification and claims should not be construed as limited to ordinary or dictionary terms and the inventor may properly define the concept of the term in order to best describe its invention It should be construed as meaning and concept consistent with the technical idea of the present invention.

Therefore, the embodiments described in the present specification and the configurations shown in the drawings are merely the most preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to represent all of the technical ideas of the present invention. Therefore, various equivalents It should be understood that water and variations may be present.

Before describing the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, it should be noted that the present invention is not described or specifically described with respect to a known configuration that can be easily added by a person skilled in the art, Let the sound be revealed.

1 is a main configuration of a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes an analysis screen processing means 100, analysis preparation means 200, analysis execution means 300, analysis result processing means 400 and a database, analysis results The processing means 400 includes a report processing means 410.

Preferably, it is noted that some modules included in each means may be configured to be included in other means or vice versa, depending on the design conditions.

The analysis screen processing means 100 mainly performs a function of managing the overall analysis screen for analyzing student preferences, and includes a screen interface module, a menu processing module, a video playback module, an Excel interlocking processing module, and a group generation module. do.

2 is a diagram illustrating an example of an analysis screen of a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The screen interface module is a module for managing an interface of the analysis screen. Referring to FIG. 2, the screen interface module functions to configure an analysis screen interface including a frame capable of playing a class video, a menu frame, all batch frames, and an analysis frame.

The menu processing module is linked to the module that performs the relevant function when the observer clicks on the menu in the menu frame of the analysis screen, and the shortcut menu for executing the analysis is displayed when the user clicks left or right on the analysis frame. Performs the function to link with the relevant module when is selected.

The video playing module performs a video processing function such as playing a video or selecting a cell to play a video part corresponding to the cell for student preference analysis.

In the analysis frame, the layout consists of cells, and each cell contains analysis time and analysis item information.

For example, the student analysis may be input as ●, and the teacher analysis may be configured as ○.

Excel linked processing module performs a function that allows the results of student preferences can be presented in conjunction with Excel.

The group generation module is a module that provides a function for placing a group, which will be described later.

3 is a diagram illustrating an example of performing a class analysis project using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The analysis preparation means 200 performs a function of managing the overall process of preparing the analysis before analyzing the student preferences, and includes a project processing module, a template processing module, and an analysis object setting module.

The project processing module performs a function of managing one entire project for analyzing student preferences, and a project execution preparation screen is illustrated in FIG. 3.

'Analytical item type' refers to classification of analytical items as a criterion for analyzing student preferences and is managed as a template.

Clicking on the 'Change' button will work with the template processing module, which will be described later.

'Site movement analysis' allows the function to analyze the preferences of the teacher's position movement.

'Video selection' may or may not load video, and not loading video may be applied when performing an analysis in the field.

4 to 6 are diagrams illustrating an example of changing and generating an analysis item template using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The template processing module performs a function of processing an analysis item template and is configured to set an analysis item and detailed items included in each item.

The analysis item refers to the item for analyzing the teacher's student preference, and the student's preference is analyzed according to this item.

Preferably, the analysis item is configured to include a teacher's moving item, student preference item, and student property setting, and the analysis item presented above is designed to be classified into various detailed items.

Depending on the design conditions, the types and details of analysis items can be changed, and can be changed through the template processing module.

For example, moving items may include 'media use', 'daily moving', and 'student guidance', and student preference items may include 'accepting emotion', 'praise', and 'accepting student ideas'. In addition, student attributes include 'gender', 'level', and 'propensity'.

The analysis target setting module performs a function of processing a screen for inputting information as an analysis target.

The observer enters basic information about the class being analyzed, which is reflected in the class frame and configured to be stored in the associated project file.

7 to 11 are diagrams showing an example of generating a group using the student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The number of groups and the group name can be determined using the group generation module, and an example in which the group is arranged is shown in FIG. 8.

It also provides the ability to copy, paste, and delete a group by clicking on a group frame (Figure 9), and provides the ability to directly enter a student attribute by clicking on the student (Figure 10).

In addition, it provides a function to determine the student copying, pasting, and copying and pasting student attributes by clicking on the student (Fig. 11).

12 is a diagram illustrating an example of performing an analysis using a student preference analysis system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The analysis execution means 300 mainly performs a function of directly executing the analysis in connection with the analysis screen processing means 100 and the like, and includes an analysis item input module, a step input module, a preference analysis module for each student, and a preference analysis module for each group. .

The analysis item input module is a module for inputting an analysis item according to the movement of the teacher movement item and the student preference item teacher by clicking a space or a student in a group frame.

According to the design conditions, the analysis item input module shows the analysis items provided by the analysis item template specified in the analysis project currently being processed, and the observer provides a screen for selecting among them or inputting special items.

The step input module provides a screen for setting a class step, and provides a function for specifying a class step by selecting a cell of a class to be analyzed.

Preferably, the class step is provided to set the number of steps and the name of the step, the color of the cell specified for each class step is displayed is changed, the specified class step is configured to be displayed in the class frame.

The preference analysis module for each student analyzes the number and types of teachers''acceptanceacceptance','praise','accept student idea', and 'question' for each student.

The preference analysis module for each group analyzes the teacher's lessons while moving to a position, and analyzes the number and types of 'media utilization', 'daily movement', and 'student guidance' for each group.

13 to 20 are diagrams illustrating an example of processing and presenting a preference analysis result using a student preference analysis system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

The analysis result processing means 400 mainly performs a function of presenting an analysis report, an analysis result, an improvement point by processing the analysis result, and includes a report processing means 410, an analysis result processing module, and an improvement point guide module.

The report processing means 410 includes a time reference processing module, a graph processing module, a matrix table processing module and a pattern ranking processing module.

The time reference processing module is configured to perform a function of processing and providing an analysis result on a time basis.

For example, an analysis result is processed based on a duration specified by an observer to indicate the number of times for each analysis item.

The graph processing module is provided to graph the analysis items, but is configured to be displayed in a straight line and a line, it can be possible to enable different types of graph processing according to the design conditions.

Preferably, it is configured to move or adjust the timeline or to display various kinds of class information at the same time.

The matrix table processing module is configured to provide an analysis item by processing a matrix table, and to perform a function of processing and displaying a matrix table of frequency and time of the analysis item.

The analysis result processing module reprocesses and presents the analysis result of the student's preference, and is also configured to be stored in the database when the analysis result is registered.

The improvement guide module is a module for managing a function of guiding an improvement that can guide an improvement to a future class by referring to an analysis report and an analysis result provided by the report processing means 410 and the analysis result processing module.

Meanwhile, the above descriptions using only FIGS. 1 to 20 describe only the main matters of the present invention, and the present invention is limited to the configurations and functions of FIGS. It is obvious that it is not limited.

100: analysis screen processing means
200: preparation for analysis
300: analysis execution means
400: analysis result processing means
410: report processing means

Claims (4)

Analysis screen processing means; Analysis execution means; Analysis result processing means; And it relates to a student preference analysis system comprising;
The analysis screen processing means provides a frame in which a group can be generated and arranged;
The analyzing executing means allows the observer to select or input an analysis item by using the frame in which the group is arranged;
Analysis result processing means is characterized by presenting the number and time of each analysis item in a graph and matrix table, student preference analysis system.
The method of claim 1,
The analysis item includes:
A student preference analysis system, characterized in that it includes an analysis item according to the position of the teacher and the student-specific analysis.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2,
The analysis preparation means includes a project processing module and a template processing module,
The project processing module allows observers to analyze and manage student preferences on a project-by-project basis.
Template processing module, characterized in that the observer to create or change the type and classification of the analysis item in the template unit, student preference analysis system.
A computer-programmed recording medium for the student preference analysis system of claim 1.
KR1020120016760A 2012-02-20 2012-02-20 The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof KR20130095387A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020120016760A KR20130095387A (en) 2012-02-20 2012-02-20 The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020120016760A KR20130095387A (en) 2012-02-20 2012-02-20 The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20130095387A true KR20130095387A (en) 2013-08-28

Family

ID=49218732

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020120016760A KR20130095387A (en) 2012-02-20 2012-02-20 The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20130095387A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015160074A1 (en) * 2014-04-16 2015-10-22 성기원 Seat arrangement method and system based on personality type test
CN107423272A (en) * 2017-04-21 2017-12-01 广东浪潮大数据研究有限公司 A kind of report form generation method and its device based on excel

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015160074A1 (en) * 2014-04-16 2015-10-22 성기원 Seat arrangement method and system based on personality type test
CN107423272A (en) * 2017-04-21 2017-12-01 广东浪潮大数据研究有限公司 A kind of report form generation method and its device based on excel

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sugar et al. Examining the anatomy of a screencast: Uncovering common elements and instructional strategies
Arslan‐Ari Learning from instructional animations: H ow does prior knowledge mediate the effect of visual cues?
Zarestky et al. Teaching high performance computing: Lessons from a flipped classroom, project-based course on finite element methods
Muñoz-Cristóbal et al. Lost in translation from abstract learning design to ICT implementation: a study using Moodle for CSCL
Schmitz et al. FoLA 2--A Method for Co-Creating Learning Analytics-Supported Learning Design.
Reich et al. Using technology integration frameworks in vocational education and training
Daun et al. Teaching conceptual modeling in online courses: Coping with the need for individual feedback to modeling exercises
Guerza ICT in the Algerian EFL classrooms: An innovative means to enhance learners’ autonomy
Youngs et al. Statistically-driven visualizations of student interactions with a French online course video
Levy Researching in language learning and technology
Põldoja et al. Web-based self-and peer-assessment of teachers’ educational technology competencies
KR20130095387A (en) The system of analyzing preference of instructor, and the recording medium thereof
Jamiat Designing problem based learning for teachers in Malaysia: A study of the nine-step problem design process
Plechawska-Wójcik et al. The comprehensive approach to students it research projects developing
Mahdavinasab et al. An investigation of the effective components considered in designing E-Learning environments in Higher education and offering a framework for E-Learning instructional design
KR101333035B1 (en) The system of analyzing behavior of students, and the recording medium thereof
Martindale et al. Exploring the inclusion of home sewing pattern development into fashion design curriculums
KR101126375B1 (en) The system of analyzing language of instruction, the method thereof, and the recording medium thereof
Queiros et al. Usability testing for teachers’ lesson planning services
Hashim et al. The design and development of augmented reality (AR) application in cloud computing learning topics
Jenkins Understanding how interactive whiteboard technology supports teaching and learning
Workman et al. Addressing Implicit Bias in Asynchronous Courses Through the Lens of UDL
Vermette An example-based customization sharing platform to support educators with using feature-rich classroom software
Asad et al. Integration of Artificial Intelligence in the Modern Classroom: Prospects for Digitization in Education
Sreedhara Kurup Video content creation as an enhancement to learning experiences about sustainable development in Indian elementary schools

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
AMND Amendment
E601 Decision to refuse application
AMND Amendment
E801 Decision on dismissal of amendment
J201 Request for trial against refusal decision
J301 Trial decision

Free format text: TRIAL DECISION FOR APPEAL AGAINST DECISION TO DECLINE REFUSAL REQUESTED 20140310

Effective date: 20150323

S901 Examination by remand of revocation
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
S601 Decision to reject again after remand of revocation