KR20120048786A - Improved method for weapon assignment with minimized dependence on the weapons and program media recording thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: An advanced weapon assignment method for minimizing dependence on weapon and program medium recording the same is provided to improve the reusability of a software by independently modularizing a weapon assignment function dependent to weapons installed according to the kinds of vessels. CONSTITUTION: A weapon assignment method is as follows. A correspondent weapon is set in advance according to each component operation(310). A list of available weapons for threatening targets distinguished in a threat evaluation step is created(330). Combat possibilities of the each weapon of the correspondent weapon list is decided(340,341,342,343). A specific weapon is assigned(350).

Description

Improved method for Weapon Assignment with minimized dependence on the weapons and program media recording etc}

The present invention relates to an improved arming allocation method for minimizing arming dependence and a program medium recording the same, and more particularly, in determining the possibility of armed engagement in a corresponding arming list, these determination functions are as independent of arming as possible. The present invention relates to an improved arming allocation method for minimizing armed dependencies by minimizing armed dependencies and minimizing reusability, and a program medium recording the same.

The naval battle system consists of sensors and armaments mounted and a command and armament control system with control over them. The command and armed control system largely handles targets received from sensors to identify tactical situations, evaluates threats from tactical situations, and assigns appropriate weapons to targets that are rated as threats to conduct armed engagement. It consists of armed control function. The armed control function of the command and armed control system, in turn, consists of threat assessment and armed allocation, where threat assessment identifies threats by threat assessment criteria. The proper allocation of weapons to threats.

The current trend in the development of naval battle systems is to minimize development time and costs by modularizing these functions to be as independent of the sensors and weapons as possible, in order to reuse command and armed control functions in different types of ships and platforms.

In the case of the command control function which processes the target received from the sensor and grasps the tactical situation, since the sensor provides most of the necessary information in common, the functions are modularized and reused so as not to be dependent on the onboard sensor. However, in the case of the armed control function, where arming is assigned to targets evaluated as threats, the arming control function is difficult to modularize because many functions are dependent on the armed armed arm, in particular, the functions, characteristics, and constraints provided by the armed armed arm. It is developed and used every time.

Accordingly, there is a need for a method for improving software reusability by minimizing the arming dependency of the armed control function in accordance with the development trend of the naval battle system. In the present invention, a method of improving the software structure for minimizing the arming dependency of the arming allocation function having a large arming dependency among arming control functions is devised. To do this, instead of modularizing each armed weapon with the ability to determine the possibility of engagement, which depends only on the features, characteristics, and constraints provided by the armed arm, the armed arm is mounted and used to take into account the interrelationships between the armed armed forces. Allows the operator to set whether and how to respond. It is possible to designate whether or not to use armed weapons for each component operation, and to assign and change the highest-armed weapons for threats for each component operation based on the designated weapons. have.

The present invention relates to the improvement of the software structure for minimizing the arming dependence of the armed allocation function, which is highly dependent on the armed of the naval battle system, and independently modularizes the armed allocation function depending on the type of weapons to be mounted differently for each type of ship. The purpose is to improve software reusability.

In order to achieve the above object, the arming allocation method in the engagement module in the tactical information processing server of the naval battle system according to the present invention includes presetting the corresponding arming for each component operation, and for the threat target identified in the threat assessment step. Generating a combatable corresponding armed list, determining the possibility of engaging each of the armed forces present in the corresponding armed list, and assigning a specific armed weapon.

In addition, when there are a plurality of combatable weapons in the corresponding armed list at the same time, allocating the specific arming may include setting a priority allocation priority for the combatable armed arm and selecting a weapon having the highest priority. And assigning them.

In the determining of the possibility of engagement, the engagement possibility determination function for each arm is modularized and used.

In addition, the step of assigning a specific arming may designate or change the top-armed armed threat for each component operation based on the designated armed or not.

In addition, when a new armed weapon is added or a large number of weapons of the same type are mounted, the modular engagement possibility determination function may be added by modularizing the engagement possibility determination function for the additional arming and the remaining functions may be reused.

The present invention also provides a method of pre-setting a corresponding arm for each component operation, generating a combatable armed list for the threat target identified in the threat assessment step, and determining the possibility of engagement of each armed arm in the corresponding armed list. Provided is a computer-readable medium having recorded thereon a program for executing an arming allocation method in an engagement module in a tactical information processing server of a naval battle system comprising the steps of assigning a specific arming.

The step of allocating the specific arming includes setting a priority allocation priority for the combatable arming in advance, and selecting and assigning the arming with the highest priority.

In addition, the computer-readable medium that records the program includes a module having a capability of determining engagement for each arm, and the determining of the engagement possibility uses the modular engagement possibility determination function.

By using the arming allocation method according to the present invention, the arming dependency of the arming allocation function having a large dependence on the armed control among arming control functions can be minimized, thereby improving the reusability of the arming control function by modularizing the arming allocation function independently. Can be.

1 is a block diagram of a naval battle system.
2 is a block diagram of the engagement module of the existing ship combat system.
FIG. 3 is a diagram of the armed allocation structure with improved software to minimize armed dependencies. FIG.
FIG. 4 shows the corresponding arming for each elementary operation to be preset by the operator in the structured arming allocation function and the priority allocation priority window for them.
5 is a conceptual diagram for reusing an improved weapon allocation function.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. The embodiments of the present invention have the purpose of illustrating the present invention and should not be regarded as limiting the present invention, and all the ideas of the present invention should be construed according to the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

1 is a block diagram of a naval battle system.

The naval battle system includes a sensor 110 and an armed 150 mounted therein and a sensor interlocking server 120 and an armed interlocking server 140 having an interlocking function therefor and a tactical information processing server 130 having command and arming control functions. It is composed of The tactical information processing server 130 having command and armed control functions, which are the main functions of the naval battle system, is largely processed from the target management module 131 and the tactical situation of the command control function to identify the tactical situation by processing the target received from the sensor. The arming control function engagement module 132 evaluates the threat and assigns the appropriate armed to the targets evaluated as the threat and performs the armed engagement.

2 is a block diagram of the engagement module of the existing ship combat system.

The engagement module is largely composed of threat assessment 210 and armed assignment 220. The threat assessment is to select 211 threats in the tactical situation and determine 212 the threat ranking by the threat assessment criteria, and the arming assignment generates the armed lists of warfare against the threat target identified in the threat assessment stage (221). After that, the possibility of engagement with the generated weapon list is determined (222), and then the specific weapon is allocated (223).

As shown in FIG. 2, the conventional arming function generates an armed list for a threat target (221), and then determines the possibility of engagement with the armed list (222) and assigns an armed (223). In determining the possibility of engagement, the interdependence between the mounted weapons is taken into consideration, so the possibility of engagement determination is dependent on the functions, characteristics, and constraints provided by the onboard weapons, and the change of the uppermost assigned arm is limited.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of the armed allocation structure with improved software to minimize armed dependencies. FIG.

According to FIG. 3, in the arming allocation method of the present invention, a step 310 of setting a corresponding arm for each component operation in advance, generating a combatable armed list for the threat target identified in the threat assessment step 330, and Determining 341, 342, and 343 possible engagement of each of the armed arms in the corresponding armed list, and allocating the specific armed 350.

In addition, when there are a plurality of combatable weapons in the corresponding armed list at the same time, allocating the specific arming may include setting a priority allocation priority for the combatable arming in advance (320), and the highest priority. Selecting and assigning an arming 350.

FIG. 3 illustrates the existing arming list generation 221 and the arming selection / assignment 223 of FIG. 2 without considering the interrelationships between the armed arms and considering only the functions, characteristics, and limitations of individual armings. Enhancement to determine the likelihood (341, 342, 343) and if it is possible to engage in multiple armed engagements that may be caused by the exclusion of interrelationships, it may be possible to assign weapons to priority weapons. Added functions 310 and 320 for setting the corresponding arming and priority allocation order.

According to the configuration diagram of FIG. 3, the corresponding arming is set in advance 310 for each component operation, and the priority allocation priority is set in advance for the set corresponding arming in order to exist in the case where a plurality of armable weapons exist at the same time. 2, generate a weapon list for the threat target identified through the threat assessment 210 of FIG. 2, and determine the possibility of engagement of each armed arm only in the corresponding armed list without considering the correlation (341, 342). , 343). If there is a warfare armable allocation (350). At this time, if there are a plurality of armed battles that can be engaged, the highest priority arming designated in (320) is allocated (350).

FIG. 4 is a view illustrating weapons corresponding to each component operation to be preset by the operator in the armed allocation function with improved structure, and priority priority windows for them.

5 is a conceptual diagram for reusing an improved weapon allocation function.

Through the conceptual diagram of FIG. 5, the structured arming allocation function is reused. The platform A is developed by applying a structural improvement of the arming allocation method 510, and modularizes the engagement possibility determination function of each armed A, B, and C (520). As shown in FIG. 4, it is possible to designate whether or not to use the mounted weapons and to designate and change the top-armed weapons for threats according to component operations based on the designated weapons.

In other words, in the stage of determining the possibility of engagement, the modularity of engagement determination function of each armed weapon is used, and in the step of assigning these specific weapons, the top-level weapons for threats for each elementary operation can be assigned or changed based on the designated weapons. have.

In addition, when a new armed weapon is added or a large number of weapons of the same type are mounted, the modular engagement possibility determination function may be added by modularizing the engagement possibility determination function for the additional arming and the remaining functions may be reused.

For example, when a new weapon is added as in the development of the new platform B of FIG. 5 or when a large number of the same types of weapons are mounted as in the gun of FIG. If only an additional armed item is added to the window of FIG. 4 (530), the remaining functions can be reused.

When developing the arming control function using the arming allocation method according to the present invention, it is possible to reduce the development period and reduce the development cost by minimizing the arming dependency of the arming allocation function to improve the reusability of the arming control function. In addition, it is expected to contribute to the prevention of domestic technology leaks in naval battleships.

110 Sensor 120 Sensor Interlock Server
130 Tactical Information Processing Server 140 Armed Interlocking Server
150 ... armed

Claims (8)

In the engagement module in the tactical information processing server of the naval battle system,
Presetting corresponding weapons for each component operation;
Generating a combatable armed list of threat targets identified in the threat assessment phase,
Determining the possibility of engaging each of the armed forces present in the corresponding armed list; and
Arming allocation method comprising the step of assigning a specific arming.
The method of claim 1,
When there are a plurality of combatable weapons in the corresponding armed list at the same time, the step of allocating the specific arming may include setting a priority order of priority for the combatable armed arm, and selecting and assigning the highest-armed arm. Arming allocation method comprising the step of.
The method of claim 2,
Determining the possibility of engagement is
Arming allocation method characterized in that the modularity of the engagement possibility determination function for each weapon.
The method of claim 2,
The step of assigning the specific arming comprises assigning or modifying the highest level arming for threats per component operation based on whether or not arming is designated.
The method of claim 3,
The arming allocation method characterized in that when the new weapons are added or a large number of the same type of arming is equipped, the modular engagement possibility determination function is added by modularizing only the engagement possibility determination function for the additional weapons and the remaining functions are reused.
Presetting corresponding weapons for each component operation;
Generating a combatable armed list of threat targets identified in the threat assessment phase,
Determining the possibility of engaging each of the armed forces present in the corresponding armed list; and
A computer-readable medium having recorded thereon a program for executing an arming allocation method in an engagement module in a tactical information processing server of a naval battle system including assigning a specific arming.
The method of claim 6,
The step of allocating the specific arming includes: setting a priority order of priority for the combatable arming, and selecting and assigning the arming having the highest priority to the tactical information processing of the naval battle system. A computer-readable medium having recorded thereon a program for executing an arming assignment method in an engagement module at a server.
The method of claim 7, wherein
The computer-readable medium recording the program includes a module having a capability of determining engagement for each arm, and the determining of engagement possibility uses the modular engagement possibility determination function. A computer-readable medium having recorded thereon a program for executing an arming assignment method in an engagement module in a tactical information processing server of a system.

Images