KR20110107548A - The korean dictionary with search function using word inflections - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a Korean dictionary for searching by conjugation of words, and more particularly, to a constitution method of using a consonant word conjugation in a constitution of a headword portion of a Korean dictionary as a search word or to use it as a headword, and a headword portion of a dictionary. By using the conjugation form without the basic form of the verb in the whole part of the meaning, and setting the representative conjugation heading and the subconjugation heading and the basic and real words in the heading part of the dictionary, It relates to a Korean dictionary to search by the conjugation of the word, characterized in that it comprises a configuration method for searching the conjugation.
According to the present invention, the phonetic information is properly represented, and the basic form of the verb is dealt with in a verb conjugation form. It can provide useful dictionaries for people who have high levels of Korean spelling and low levels of spelling, or for elementary school students, especially foreigners who are learning Korean. Furthermore, it can be applied to electronic dictionaries or Internet dictionaries that can be searched by all utilization types of words through text or phonetic languages.

Description

Korean Dictionaries WITH SEARCH FEATURES {THE KOREAN DICTIONARY WITH SEARCH FUNCTION USING WORD INFLECTIONS}

The present invention relates to a Korean dictionary for searching by conjugation of words, and more particularly, to a constitution method of using a consonant word conjugation in a constitution of a headword portion of a Korean dictionary as a search word or to use it as a headword, and a headword portion of a dictionary. By using the conjugation form without the basic form of the verb in the whole part of the meaning, and setting the representative conjugation heading and the subconjugation heading and the basic and real words in the heading part of the dictionary, It relates to a Korean dictionary to search by the conjugation of the word, characterized in that it comprises a configuration method for searching the conjugation.

In general, the structure of the Korean dictionary can be divided into the heading and the meaning part. There are three research problems of the heading. First, the general Korean dictionary uses the basic form of the word as the heading. The basic form of the word has a problem that the notation correctly displays the pronunciation information. Second, the basic form of the verb is not an artificial word but an artificially organized artificial word. Third, there is a problem in that the morphological theory necessary for constructing a dictionary to search by all utilization forms of the pronunciation type is concentrated on the construction of a notation-character dictionary that is spelled. This is a drawback of not being able to technically cope with the trend of the information age, where the language of speech is mainly used and the language of speech is important.

In more detail, the first problem is that the basic form of a word used as a dictionary heading is subject to '7 kinds of pronunciation constraints', in which only seven kinds of sound are pronounced. There are many problems that arise. Therefore, we can think of setting the word conjugation type as a search term as an alternative to the basic type.

And the second problem is that the basic form of the verb is an artificially organized form with the ending ending {-da} in the stem, which is not actually used. For example, you should say {eat rice}, where the basic verb is {eat}. This is an artificial form made by forcibly adding the ending {-da} to the stem {muk-}, so the term {eat rice} is not actually used in the language life. Therefore, it can be seen that there is a contradiction of using artificial words that are not actually used in the dictionary that should put natural words.

In addition, the third problem is that in the existing electronic dictionary, words that exactly match the notation can be searched in various forms, but not in all forms of pronunciation or phonetic language. This may be due to the fact that Korean grammar research is made up of spell-oriented morphology. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a phonetic morphological study that reflects the reality of speech with the use of the phonetic language. Therefore, the development of an electronic dictionary, which is searched for all forms of use of words through text and voice, is required.

While describing the three research problems of the Korean dictionary as described above will be described the background of the present invention.

Although prior studies related to the present invention have been sought, no direct research has been found. Anyone can easily think that it would be good to use conjugations, such as verbs, verses, and formulas. However, the use of words in Korean language is so diverse and delicate that it is technically difficult to present it as the heading of a dictionary. In addition, it is considered that there is no attempt to search by utilizing all words by not only the notation but also the pronunciation including the voice.

However, according to the necessity of the dictionary as a resource for those who learn Korean as a foreign language, or to use it as a learning material for using words, an attempt to increase the effect of word learning by simply using several types of verbs as the heading of the dictionary It's happened before. This method is commonly known and is different from the principles of the present invention.

Therefore, there is no previous research directly related to the present invention, but the paper related to the selection of headwords of the verb usage type was found. Jeong, Sang-geun, "A Study on the Selection of Headings of Verbal Utilization in Korean Learning Dictionary," Journal of Korean Language Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, International Korean Education Association, 2002, p. 207. The selection criteria include 'unusual use language learning in the first, intermediate and intermediate level', and 'second, the use of regular language learning in the elementary and intermediate level, with no support for the end syllables of the basic stem, but only the word 'Third, it compares the frequency of appearance and importance in real life or education field'. This is a completely different object and method from the present invention. This study is concerned with the selection of conjugations of terminology. In particular, since the second criterion selected that the base syllable does not have a support, the present invention can be seen to be contrary to the solution of the use of the consonant rather than the problem of the support sound.

Therefore, the idea of the present invention, the theorem of linguistic principles, the establishment of concepts, the application and the construction method, etc. can be seen as pioneering new fields.

Next, as a first research problem of the Korean dictionary, the basic form of the words used as dictionary headings will be examined from the problem that the notation correctly displays the pronunciation information. Korean words are characterized by various and detailed usage, and most of the language life is composed of utilization forms rather than basic forms of words. In particular, since verbs are stem-dependent morphologies, it is necessary to add a mother, and most of the verbs are used in the form of investigation.

However, the conventional Korean dictionary is mainly composed of the basic forms of words. That is, in the case of verbs, the headword is also a basic form, and the basic form of the word is also used in the sentence of the meaning solution part of the verb. In more outgoing examples of sentences, most of the examples in the dictionary use primitives. Therefore, the dictionary that uses a lot of basic forms is far from the language life that uses a lot of utilization forms.

By the way, the basic form of the word under the so-called 'seven kinds of pronunciation constraints', which is realized by only seven kinds of support sounds, the notation often does not correctly display the pronunciation information. Therefore, people who can speak Korean may have difficulty in searching the dictionary, especially those who have a low level of learning Korean. For example, a person who knows the pronunciation of [makta] cannot search the dictionary without knowing the basic form {clear}.

In addition, since the use of words in Korean is diverse and complicated, there are many cases where a dictionary cannot be found because the user knows how to use a word but does not know the basic form of the word. For example, a person who can say [weather is broken] can't find a dictionary unless they know that the basic form of [damaged] is {clear}.

In Fig. 1, since the pronunciation form of the basic {bright} 101 is [bakta], it is different from the written form. This is the phenomenon of stem support [d, a] and ending ending {-da}. In other words, the combination of the ending ending {-da} does not produce the sound of stem support [d] (referred to as 'falling'), and the pitch of {-da} is also transformed into [-ta]. Therefore, the form {bright-} (102) is pronounced as [bak] in the notation, which is different from the notation.

On the contrary, since the pronunciation type of {bright} 103 becomes [balgayo], it has a structure in which the sound configuration of the notation and the pronunciation coincide. In other words, when {Bright-} becomes [Balga-] (104), the sound of 'Bl' is pronounced as 'L' and 'ㄱ'. Therefore, in the consonant conjugation, when the word 'ㄹㄱ' is written, it is gathered into one syllable and written like {Bright-}, and when pronounced, it is realized by two syllables as [Balga-] . This phenomenon is called 'consonance of notation and pronunciation' in soft form.

'Yon-eum' refers to a phenomenon in which a basal sound is pronounced as the first sound of a vowel (the first consonant) when a word or survey beginning with a vowel is combined with a stem or idiom of a verb. Since this has the same result as 'wrought iron' in the notation except for a special case such as palatalization, in this description, it is intended to say that the sound of the stem or stem is the first sound of the next syllable as 'yeonmyeon' or 'soft iron'. For example, a form of a conjugation type that is pronounced as [balgayo] and denoted as {brighter} is called 'conjugated conjugation' (or 'consonant').

In the case of the recital in FIG. 1, since the pronunciation of the basic type {life} 105 is [three], the notation does not correctly display pronunciation information. However, if you look at the life-threatening {life] and his pronunciation [salmi] (107), {life-} becomes like [salmi] (108) and the sound of 'ㄹㅁ' is the support of 'ㄹ' and 'ㅁ'. It is realized by sound.

Particularly, those who receive basic Korean language education, such as elementary school, literacy education, or foreign language Korean education, may find it difficult to know the spelling of the basic type, which may cause them to stay away from the dictionary. However, if they only understand the ringtone phenomena of the bass sound, the use of 'bright' [bright] [balgayo] is easier and easier to search than the basic '{bright} [bakta]'.

'Literacy education' refers to the education of people who have learned Korean as their native language and are not good at reading and writing Korean. In modern times, it is estimated that there are still millions of people who are educated in our country. Lee Hee-soo (Research Director) and five others, "A Study on the Survey of Non-literacy in Korean Adults" (Korean Educational Development Institute, Trust Research CR 2002-, pp. 35-36). You can see the data.

For the elementary school students, those receiving literacy education, and for international students, the sound of the {deep} prop is difficult and the {bright} the prop sound is more difficult. However, if you say {deep} [giffer yo] as a conjugation, you can easily come up with the sound of 'ㅍ', and if you say {bright} [balgayo], you will easily hear the sound of 'ㄹㄱ'. In addition, the situation with such a problem is also the same in the case of communication. According to Figure 1, the noun {life} is pronounced [three] (105). However, {life}, which has a survey {-yi / ga} in its basic form {life}, becomes [salmi] (107) with a consonant or soft iron.

As such, the reason why the notation and pronunciation are not identical in the basic form of Korean words can be found in the opposition of spelling and pronunciation. This is because the spelling is limited to using 27 kinds of stand sounds, whereas the standard pronunciation method has only 7 kinds of supports in front of words and consonants.

According to Hangul Spelling Chapter 2 Jamo, Clause 4, Attachment 1, 2 (National Institute of Korea's homepage, Korean language regulations, search 2007.12.18), the number of consonants is 19 and the sound is 27, as shown in the table below. Here, the first sound of the syllable is referred to as 'first sound' or 'choseong', and the end sound of the syllable is referred to as 'support sound' or 'end sound, Jongsung', and the syllable's sound is called 'collection sound' or 'neutral'. The first sound and the sound of the support that make up the syllables are summarized as follows.

Table 1 below is about the first syllables and the bass sounds of Korean spelling.

division Consonant Remarks Syllable first sound
(First time) A, b, c, d, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k, k 19 kinds Buzz
(Jongjong) A, b, b, b, b, b, b, c, b, r, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b, b Eh, ㅎ
27 kinds

According to Table 1, since there are 27 kinds of support sounds, there are eight more sounds than the first sound. It also tells us that the role of standoff in notation is much more important, and that standoff becomes more difficult than the first.

By the way, according to the pronunciation of Chapter 4 of the Standard Pronunciation Method-Clause 8 (National Institute of Korea's homepage, language and regulations, search December 18, 2007), "the sound of support is 'ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅇ' Pronounces only seven consonants. " This refers to pronunciation constraints in which 27 of the notations of the notation are not pronounced. The environment (condition) under which the support sound is restricted in pronunciation is 'before words and consonants'. Paragraph 9 of the standard phonetic method states that "the support 'ㄲ,' ',' ㅅ, ㅆ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅌ ', and'" is pronounced as a representative sound before the words or consonants, respectively. Prescribed.

Thus, we can say that the twenty-seven of the notations of the notation are neutralized in seven before words and consonants. This pronunciation is referred to as the '7-jongseong pronunciation' (hereinafter referred to as '7-jongjong') of the sound. This is because there is a characteristic of articulation with only the sound of support.

Regarding the characteristics of bass sound articulation, in the writings of Choi, Jong-min's article, "The Sound of Korean and Music Sounds (2) -Songs and Singing Songs-Korean Music History Journal, Vol. 17, The Korean Society for Music History, 1996, 133. [B, c, ㅂ] refers to the clogging trumpet, and [b, ㅁ, ㅇ, d] refers to the ringing trumpet. The articulation of vowels is the vocal vocalization that ends by preventing the vowels of vowels, and [b, ㅁ, ㅇ, ㄹ] is the vowels of the vowels [b, ㅁ, ㅇ] or the vowel [ㄹ] It is summarized as 'sounding change' that ends with a simple description as shown in FIG.

According to this, the seven-jong method (201), which is the articulation of the basal sound, acts to prevent the sound of the vowels (202), or the articulation of changing the sound of the vowels to the nasal or the sound (203). These two articulations are complementary, which is to be referred to as 'supportive constraints' (204).

Since the sound of the gob finishes the sound of the vowel, it can't act as 'rupture' or 'friction', which is the essential articulation of the consonant. Therefore, only seven species (a, c, ㅂ, b, ㅁ, ㅇ, d) of the twenty-seven of the basal sounds of the notation can have their original values, and the other twenty lose their own values.

All headings in English dictionaries have different pronunciation and pronunciation, so the phonetic symbols must be marked separately. On the other hand, Korean uses Hangeul (Hunminjeongeum), which can be written down phonetically, so the notation and pronunciation are essentially the same. However, pronunciation words are separately written in the heading part only in the case of words restricted by pronunciation depending on the voice environment.

In this way, Korean does not need to display a phonetic symbol separately for each word. However, in the dictionary, a basic form subject to the pronunciation restriction of the seven-jong method is put on the heading as a title, and the pronunciation is separately displayed. This is a problem. However, if the heading is a conjugation type in which the notation and pronunciation are the same as the consonants, it is not necessary to separately display the pronunciation information in the dictionary.

It is conceivable that the use of the basic form with different notation and pronunciation as the heading excludes the vocal language of 'speaking and listening', and is mainly the result of the text language mainly for 'reading and reading'. In language, pronunciation is directly related to the area of 'speaking and listening'.

There is a need to increase the usefulness of dictionary headings by using word forms that match the notation and pronunciation in the heading part of the dictionary. In particular, in terms of Korean language education, it is effective to compile educational Korean dictionaries that use headings as word-using forms that match pronunciation and notation in speaking and listening.

In the information age of the 21st century, text and voice languages are important. In particular, when developing and using electronic dictionaries to search by phonetic language, it is more appropriate to use consonant conjugations as headings than to use basic forms that do not match pronunciation and headings as headings. Even with these considerations, the problem of using dictionary headings as the basic form is in need of improvement.

So far, we have raised the research problem of using the basic form of word as a heading.

Table 2 below relates to the problem of using the basic form with different notation and pronunciation in dictionary headings.

Problems caused by different notation and pronunciation of the basic form Alternatives  (1) Even if you know the pronunciation, it is often difficult to search the dictionary. Consonant word application  (2) Korean uses Korean as headings for basic forms with different notations and pronunciations, and writes pronunciation information (pronounced symbols) separately like an English dictionary.  (3) The use of the basic form of the title as a heading is a way of focusing on the text language rather than the phonetic language.  (4) The basic form of headings with spelling notation results in neglect of the area of pronunciation-voice language such as 'speaking or listening'.  (5) In order to improve the efficiency of speaking-listening in Korean language education, an educational Korean dictionary that uses the Yin-myeon type where the notation contains pronunciation information is needed.  (6) When the 21st-century phonetic language emerges as the center, it is not appropriate to use a basic form with headings that differ in notation and pronunciation.  (7) In electronic dictionaries that search by text and voice, it is more appropriate to use the method of matching the pronunciation and pronunciation in soft sound than other basic forms.

According to Table 2, it can be seen that using a word base form different from the notation and pronunciation in the dictionary headword can be problematic in various aspects. Therefore, in the heading part of the dictionary, it is necessary to use the word utilization type that matches the notation and pronunciation.

Next, as a second research problem of the conventional Korean dictionary, we will look into the problem of the basic form of the verb. Verb primitives used in the heading or the meaning part (including examples) are artificial word forms that are not actually used. That is, since the verb basic form is artificially organized by attaching the ending ending {-da} to the stem, it is not a natural word form, but there is a problem of using a word form that is not actually used in the dictionary.

However, the basic form of the adjective is also a form of ending with the ending ending {-da} as in the case of verbs, but in the case of adjectives it is a word used naturally in everyday life such as {wide} or {deep}. Therefore, it can be seen that only basic forms of verbs matter.

Conventional Korean dictionaries not only use the basic forms of verbs, but also use the basic forms of verbs in the sentence part of the dictionary. For example, most of the examples of verb basic {eat} are presented as "Everybody eats." This sentence is like stopping in the middle of a conversation, and it's hard to know what the meaning is. In order for the sentence to be correct and natural, "Everyone eats rice" should be.

The basic form of {eat} is artificially made by adding the ending {-da} to the stem of {eat-}, so it is not actually used. For people with low levels of Korean learning, dictionaries with such contradictions may not help learning, but rather may interfere with learning.

Here, we will present an example of using the verb basic form, which is an artificial word form, in the sentence as well as the headword. Some examples of this are as follows: 'Standard Korean Dictionary' (National Institute of Korean Language website, search date 2007.12.29) and 'Yonsei Korean Dictionary' (Yonsei Korean dictionary website, search date 2007.12.29).

Table 3 below is about the basic forms of verbs used in the Korean dictionary.

division entry Basic Forms of Use Standard Korean Dictionary {eat} Meaning:
To bring food into the stomach Example: the rice eat / drink eat / eat about / water eat satisfied with / eat foods / Lisa weakened eat chicken / Rana a body is to eat a restorative and stumbled a few times always golgol. Yonsei Korean Dictionary {eat} Meaning:
To pass food through the mouth .
A. Chew gaily take the food to the stomach.
N. Drink liquids.
C. Chew or drink medicine . Example of a: Children eat sweets well .
ㄴ Example: The child does not eat milk all day, but only crying.
Example of c: He took medicine for a month .

According to Table 3, the underlined words are all verb basic forms. For verb primitive {to eat}, the standard Korean dictionary used the verb primitive {to send in} in the meaning sentence, and also used the verb primitive {to eat] in the example sentences.

Also, the Yonsei Korean Dictionary uses verb basic forms such as {turn, send, drink} in the meaning sentence, which is an artificial word form. To be a natural word type, you have to be like {turn over, send, drink}. However, only the part of the meaning used verbs such as {eat, eat, eat}. Therefore, compared to the standard Korean dictionary, it can be seen as having more practical.

However, the two dictionaries are identical in that they use the verbal form in the heading and the meaning. The meaning is presented in the form of an intact sentence. It is obvious that if an artificial word type is used without using a natural word type, it does not really fit the word.

Even if the headword is a noun such as {value}, we can also use verb primitives in our examples. In the case of the standard Korean dictionary, it is equivalent to 'raise the price / raise the price / put the price / cut the price'. Less than this, but the Yonsei Korean Dictionary calls' value. Say how much it costs Tell the price to pay. ' You can see examples like this. Therefore, we can see that the basic forms of verbs are used throughout the two dictionaries.

In actual language life, it is difficult to see examples of using verbal forms. Occasionally, something like "what to do" can be found in the title of an article in a newspaper, which is only a special use with special intentions. This is a bad sentence in natural and normal Korean grammar.

Verb primitives are commonly used in dictionary headings, meaning pools, and example sentences. Verb primitives are also used in words illustrated in the current Hangul spelling. You can see a lot of basic forms of verbs as illustrated in the Unification of Korean Spelling, which was enacted in 1933 (search for 'Hangul Spelling' on the Korean Language Society homepage, January 3, 2008). Of course, Korean grammar theory research also uses a lot of verb forms.

However, the Hangul spelling and standard language regulations do not require the use of verb base forms, but only the basic words in the illustrated words. This seems to work as an implicit provision that the verb basic form can be used. According to this, the basic form of the verb can be used in the dictionary.

But dictionaries can be seen as intrinsically carrying and interpreting the words actually used. However, the use of the verb basic form, which is an artificial word form in the headword and the meaning solution, is an interpretation of words that are not actually used. This is inherently contradictory and can be problematic in view of the practicality of dictionaries.

In particular, elementary school students or those who learn Korean as a foreign language would look at the dictionary and actually try to use the verb basic form or the sentence in the heading. This will allow you to make sentences with verb basic forms, which are artificial word forms that are not actually used, which adds confusion in the learning process. Therefore, in terms of Korean language education, this should be improved.

In addition, even in Korean grammar or in pragmatics or semantics, it is difficult to use the basic form of {eat} as the ending form of a normal sentence. This is because English has a clear grammar for verb prototyping, and Japanese has a clear grammar for using verb primitives, but Korean has no grammar for verb primitives. This is the grammar of Korean studies. Even if we use forms such as prototypes or basic forms of verbs in English or Japanese, it is out of the essence of Korean to use artificial forms of verbs that do not exist in Korean.

Especially in the Korean dictionary, which should use natural words actually used, it is difficult to understand a sentence ending with an artificial word verb basic form as an example sentence or a meaning solution. This can be seen as rebuilding Korean structures.

Changing the basic form of the verb requires further academic discussion, which remains a challenge for the Korean language community. But you can't just discuss forever. This is because it is directly related to the problem of Korean language education, and in particular, the terminology of the dictionary and its language are used as words, and thus the amount of usage is high and it has a great influence on education and research.

The problems of the verb basic form discussed above are summarized as follows.

Table 4 below relates to problems of verb basic forms used in dictionaries.

Problems with verb primitives in dictionaries Alternatives  (1) Verb primitives are not natural word forms, but artificially organized word forms. Conjugation of verbs  (2) The verb basic form is a word that is not used in actual language life.  (3) It is contradictory to use verb base forms as headwords or pool words that are not used in real language life in dictionaries where actual words are to be used.  (4) A person receiving literacy education, an elementary school student, or a person learning Korean as a foreign language will be confused by using the headings of dictionaries or verbal forms used as their translations.

According to Table 4, it can be said that the use of the verb basic form in the headword and the solution word of the dictionary needs improvement.

In particular, we should not use verb primitives in dictionary headings, solution words, and example sentences, as we must avoid confusion in student learning. Given the increasing number of people who learn Korean as a foreign language in the 21st century, it is necessary to take educational measures to prevent the use of verbal forms in the dictionary's headings and lexicons.

Next, we will look at the third research problem of the conventional Korean dictionary. In other words, due to insufficient theorem of the morphological theory necessary to find a way to search for all words using forms of pronunciation or phonetic language, the method of searching by all forms of words using pronunciation or voice was not properly developed. I will explain.

In the existing electronic dictionary, only the basic type that is spelled is searched by using various words of the word. There is a conditional restriction, using only spelling forms and limiting the terminology. Therefore, the pronunciation type or the phonetic type cannot be used as a search word in the search using all types of words, and the utilization type of the word has a limitation that is excluded from the object.

Having all the conjugations as they are in the dictionary is not feasible due to the problem of dealing with a large number of word forms, nor is it necessary to put all conjugations with the same basic meaning. You just need to find a way to search with all words.

Existing dictionaries generally use the basic form according to the notation as the heading, and even the pronunciation dictionary only targets the pronunciation of the basic form. Among the pronunciation dictionaries, in the Korean Broadcasting Corporation's book, Standard Korean Phonetic Dictionary (Eummungak, 1993), this dictionary uses the basic form of a word as its heading and describes only its pronunciation information. It does not provide a solution.

However, in some electronic dictionaries, a method of searching for the basic type of the utilization type and providing a solution is provided when the word utilization type is written according to the notation. You can check in the dictionary search such as 'Naver' or 'Next'. These dictionaries are limited in that they must be input in the form of usages in accordance with the notation.

Conjugated forms with terminology notation always maintain the shape of the stem, so it can be seen that only the stem form should be used. For example, the basic type {clear} is used as the {{clear, clear, clear, but clear}, etc., and since the stem {clear-} is represented as a representative type, {clear-} can be used as a search type. will be.

The disadvantage of these dictionaries is that they must be entered only in spelling characters of all forms of verbs. Therefore, there is a problem that can not be searched in the form of a verb or formula, and there is also a problem that can not be searched in the pronunciation form, there is a problem that can not be searched if you enter the voice more.

In order to solve the problems of the prior art as described above, the present invention can solve the problem that the conventional dictionary headword basic form is not pronounced and pronunciation is not matched by the pronunciation constraints of the seven kinds of methods by using the conjugation type that the sound is consonant in the dictionary headword It is aimed to provide a Korean dictionary to search by conjugation of a word.

In addition, an object of the present invention is to provide a Korean dictionary to search by utilizing the improved form of the word by replacing the use of the verb basic form, which is an artificial word form in the existing dictionary with a verb conjugation form in the existing dictionary.

In addition, an object of the present invention is to provide a Korean dictionary for searching by utilizing the type of words that can be searched by the actual use of the letters and pronunciation and voice used.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention in the Korean dictionary,

In the composition of the heading part of the dictionary, the method of constructing the use of consonant words as a search term or as the heading itself,

How to construct a conjugation form without using the basic form of the verb in the heading part and the meaning part of the dictionary,

To search by the utilization type of the word characterized in that it comprises a configuration method for searching all utilization forms of word notation or phonetic language type by setting the representative utilization heading and sub-utilization heading in the heading part of the dictionary and the basic and real words. Provide Korean dictionary.

In particular, the Korean dictionary places a conjugation type such as a suffix or a verb in the heading part of the dictionary in front of the basic type as a heading, and uses it as a search term for a basic type, or uses a conjugation type such as a suffix or a verb as the heading itself, The main subject of the pronunciation type is to find only the heading of the pronunciation type, or put the basic type after the consonant type in the heading part and put the pronunciation type in multiple search terms, or use it as a multiple search term, The concept of any one selected from between the real phoneme and the phoneme common phoneme and the stem source sound can be used.

In addition, the Korean dictionary may be a paper dictionary, electronic dictionary or Internet dictionary.

The first effect of the present invention is to solve the problem that the basic form used in the headword of the dictionary is caused by a mismatch in pronunciation and notation due to the restriction of 7 kinds of pronunciation. This problem is solved by applying the conjugation type that the bass sounds are used for, that is, the word utilization type that is used as a vowel or survey of vowels. According to this method, information of 27 buzzing sounds can be correctly displayed in the heading of the dictionary.

In other words, in the usage form of the word and the verb, the notation suggests a word utilization form that properly displays the information of the pronunciation, so that it can be used for the search of the dictionary. In other words, the stems of verbs are combined with the endings that begin with vowels to accurately display the stem support information of stems.

The second effect is to solve the problem that the verb basic form, which is an artificial word type, is used in the dictionary's heading, the meaning pool, and the example sentence, and thus uses the word or sentence that is not actually used in the dictionary. This problem is solved by substituting the verb form for the verb form.

The third effect is that in addition to the basic words of the notation type, the concept of the real word is made from the word usage type of the phonetic language, and the method of analyzing the form between the real words can be created to create an electronic dictionary that searches all the utilization types of the word through text and voice. It is.

Through this effect, it is possible to improve the practicality of the dictionary by solving the problem of not being able to search the dictionary because it is not possible to make a basic type among people who have low level of Korean spelling or elementary school students, especially foreigners who are learning Korean. The unreasonable problem of using the basic verbs in organized words in the headword and the solution has been solved, and it can be applied to electronic dictionaries or Internet dictionaries as it can be searched freely using all types of words through not only letters but also voice languages.

Figure 1 is a comparative example of the basic form of words and conjugation type consonants.
Figure 2 is an exemplary structure of the articulation of the word standoff.
3 is an exemplary view illustrating a structure of converting audible sound of conjugation type.
4 is an exemplary diagram illustrating the relationship between the yin and jong 7 method and the notation basis of the support.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a search term using a consonant conjugation type according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG.
5 is a model diagram using the terminology of the consonant conjugation type according to an embodiment of the present invention.
7 is a heading partial model diagram for searching by text and voice according to an embodiment of the present invention.
8 is a heading partial model diagram of a dictionary found with all utilization types according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 9 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an electronic dictionary to look for all utilization types according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram and a working model diagram of an audio-negative analyzer of an electronic dictionary according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG.
11 is a working model diagram of an output word processing unit of an electronic dictionary according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.

The terms used in the present invention are summarized as follows. The term 'table control' is a 'spelling word' of a dictionary, and refers to a word item placed in a certain order. In addition, when dividing the items of the word of the dictionary into two parts, the part that gives information attached to the headword is called the 'table control part', and the part that gives information such as the meaning pool or example sentence is called 'the part of the word'. In addition, verbs and adjectives are referred to as 'words', and nouns, pronouns, and rhetoric words are referred to as 'subjects' and adverbs and adjectives are 'formal words'.

In addition, I would say that both the form of the mother's stem and the form of the survey's stem are added to the stem of the word. Also, the form of the word is represented as 'eat', the word or survey is represented as '-da' or '-i / ga', the stem is represented as 'eat-', and when the pronunciation (sound) is written, Let's express it like this.

The present inventors regard the dictionary as the most ideal Korean dictionary, which can be searched with all types of words through texts or voices, presenting some representative and sub-use types in the heading section, and setting the basic and real words between them. I tried to develop a Korean dictionary which is searched with all the forms of words through the phonetic language.

More specifically, in order to compensate for the weakness of the basic type spelling information that is subject to seven kinds of pronunciation constraints in the heading part of the dictionary, by using the soft-phone type, which is the form of the ending or investigation that begins with the vowel, How information is spelled correctly by means of soft or soft iron, how to use the title heading in the heading section, and the phonetic heading to find the title heading, and the dictionary heading or the sentence And how to use verb conjugations instead of basic verbs in example sentences, and how to apply notions of basic words and conjugations between real words and phonemic common phonemes, stem roots, etc. Specializing in making paper or electronic dictionary by applying complex or selective It is to create a Korean dictionary to search by the conjugation of the word.

According to the type of dictionaries that are created according to this type, in the heading part of the dictionary, the conjugation type such as suffix or idiom is placed before the base type, which is the headword, and the conjugation type such as dictionary, suffix or verb is used as the heading itself. Dictionaries and dictionaries that use verb conjugations in place of verb bases in dictionaries, headings, suffixes, and example sentences, which are mainly used for dictionaries, headings in the notational form, and pronunciation headings in the notational heading There is a dictionary that puts the basic type behind and puts the pronunciation type as a multiple search word, and applies the compositional features of these dictionaries in combination or in part to paper dictionary or electronic dictionary.

In order to create an ideal Korean electronic dictionary that is searched by all types of texts and voices, we apply the composition method of searching for all types of words by setting the headings of representative types, the headings of sub-use types, and the basic and real words between headings. By doing so, it is possible to create a Korean dictionary to search by utilizing the word, characterized in that the electronic dictionary to search for the notation and pronunciation type of all words by text or by searching all the word utilization type of the voice language.

In short, by using the basic form of the word in the dictionary heading, the problem of inconsistency with the pronunciation due to the pronunciation restriction of the seven-jong method is solved by the conjugation type that the bass sound is soft (soft iron). The problem of the use of is that the first point of the present invention is to solve the problem by replacing with the use of verbs, and then, the second is to create an ideal Korean electronic dictionary that can be searched for all the utilization forms of words through text and voice. I can say the point.

In addition, if the existing general Korean dictionary has a normative character, the Korean dictionary of the present invention can be seen to have a practical character. The following three steps are considered suitable for the stage of practical use.

The first stage is to create an educational Korean dictionary for elementary education and literacy education. It requires about 3,000 headed dictionaries. This dictionary is for people who are not good at Hangul and spelling by learning Korean as their mother tongue.

The second stage is a dictionary for people who learn Korean as a foreign language, and the Korean dictionary for foreign education is made into a small dictionary with about 3,000 headings. This dictionary constitutes a dictionary that can be easily and conveniently searched using words to meet the condition of a dictionary for people who learn Korean. Education to find dictionaries would be effective if you could identify the identity of the sound of props according to the principles of soft and soft iron.

The third step is to construct a general Korean dictionary in small and large size. Of course, academic dictionaries are included. Since English and Japanese have a grammar using the basic form of the verb, the basic form of the verb is also naturally raised in the heading of the dictionary.However, in Korean, since the verb uses the basic form of the verb, the basic form of the verb is not used in this dictionary. Verbal conjugations are also used in the literary and example sentences. In this dictionary, the construction of a full-fledged electronic dictionary is also realized.

In these three stages, the existing dictionary system composed of basic forms is used as it is, and the utilization form is used only in the searching stage by adding the utilization form to the search term before the basic form. Increasingly, it is not unreasonable to make a dictionary using the headword itself, to exclude the basic verb form from the dictionary, and to construct a dictionary using the verb conjugation form.

The Korean dictionary searched by the conjugation form of the word of the present invention, the constitution method of using the word conjugation used in the constitution of the heading part of the dictionary as a search term or using it as the heading itself, and the whole of the heading part and the meaning part of the dictionary How to exclude basic form and use conjugation form, and configure constitution method to search all utilization forms of word form or phonetic form by setting representative utilization heading and subconjugation heading and basic and real words in heading part of dictionary. It is characterized by including.

Hereinafter, specific details for the implementation of the present invention will be divided into two parts. In the first stage, the structure and features of the consonant utilisation, which are presented as alternatives to the basic problem used as the dictionary heading, are explained through theory and example, and the method of morphological analysis of the vocal language utilization is theoretically established. In this article, we will explain the composition problem of Korean dictionary.

(Step 1)

1. Structure and Features of Yin-Yang and Its Form Analysis Method

In the first step, the conjugation type that is consonant among words Explain the characteristics centering on the example and discuss the theory on how to analyze pronunciation Explain.

In that order, first, it explains the characteristics of conjugated word conjugation, secondly, it compares seven species and consonant method, and third, explains the conjugation type of dictionary to be applied to the heading and the meaning of the dictionary. Explain the usage forms of the statement to be applied to the headword and the meaning of the dictionary. Fifth, the concept of the form analysis method of the pronunciation utilization type including the phonetic form in the word utilization form will be established.

The number '1.1.', Which is attached to the title below, is attached to mean the explanation of paragraph 1 in the first step, and the following method is used.

1.1. Characteristics of Conjugated Word Conjugation

Conjugation in conjugation of verbs is like wrought iron. According to FIG. 3, the utilization type {clear} 301 becomes [singing] 302 in the middle tone, so that the representation and the pronunciation of the word correspond in practice. In other words, the pronunciation of the word Yin-Yeong, which is pronounced as {Yeam}, becomes {Mal-Yo-Yo} in wrought iron notation. Thus, {clearer}, the conjugation of {-no / er}, is a coincidence between the notation and the pronunciation. In the conjugation type used in this way, it can be seen that the notation coincides with the pronunciation in soft iron and soft sound.

'Wrought iron' refers to the spelling method in which stems of a stem are combined with the vowels of the mother. The soft pronunciation is consistent with soft iron notation (302) because the soft sound notation is written in soft letters.

The phenomenon of coincidence with the notation is the same when there is only one base. For example, the conjugation type {eat} is a wrought iron that is written {mergeryo} and the pronounced yin becomes [mergeryo]. In {eating}, the spelling of the stem is written as {mum-}, but written in wrought iron notation is {merger-}. Therefore, it can be seen that the pronunciation and pronunciation coincide in the wrought iron notation and the pronunciation of the yin.

In the usage of idioms {clear} and {eat}, the notation and pronunciation are coincident because they are used as the ending of {-oh / er}. In the case of endings that begin with the suffix [ㅇ], such as [a] or [word], most of the notation and pronunciation are identical. In this explanation, it is said that 'syllable starts with vowels' according to the practice of using syllables that begin with the latter [o], such as [a] or [er].

A syllable that begins with a vowel is precisely a syllable that begins with a posterior [ㅇ]. By the way, the last sound [ㅇ] is a sound that comes out of the throat without sound, so the syllables such as [a] are regarded as the sound value of [ㅏ] with only vowels. Thus, the letter "a" or "uh", such as [?], While showing the post, "syllables begin with the vowels" is called.

The concept of the latter [ㅇ] is an important concept in the middle tone, so I will explain it further. The latter [ㅇ] has a special linguistic meaning in the creation of Hunminjeongeum (Korean). On the other hand, in the writings of Choi Jong-min, "The Sounds of Korean and Music Sounds (8) -The Sounds of the Throne [O] and the Three-Twoth-Period Five-Tinged Songs", "History and Culture of Korean Language" (Park Yi-jung, 2007), pp. 316-322 Summed up as 'the zero sound invention of linguistics', that is, the same concept as the zero of mathematics, which is called linguistic 'zero sound'. Even if it is written as 01 ', the value of the number is 1, and even if it is written as [a] in the syllable, the value of sound can be regarded as the same as [모음].

In this sense, syllables like [ah] and [uh] should be said to be 'syllables starting with zero sound'. But as practice has been used, I would say 'syllables that begin with vowels'. Therefore, I would like to say that endings such as {-no / uh} are 'mothers that begin with vowels', or 'collecting mothers' for short. The term includes the meaning that it begins with a suffix [o], and also means that a vowel occurs in the vowel sound of the stem. Thus, it can be said that the vowel mother use type is the yeonum utilization type.

The principle of structural system related to the sound quality of the rear sound [ㅇ] is working on the support sound download phenomenon of the soft-phone utilization type. According to FIG. 3, the sum of the stem bases [a] and [o] of the iron-type notation {clear} 301 is realized as [a] of the consonants in [laughs] 302. In the groin that the mother [A] downloads from the stem of the stem, an equation of sound such as '[a] + [ㅇ] = [ㄱ]' is established. This has the same context as the mathematical equation '1 + 0 = 1' (304).

The equations have the meaning of two terms equal to left and right, so the two terms are transformed into each other. Therefore, [a, o] of the pronunciation of consonants becomes a [a] of the pronunciation of the consonants, and again [a] of the pronunciation of the consonants has a structural system of interconversion (303), which can be [a, o] of the pronunciation of consonants. can see. Thus, in the vowel endings, it can be summarized that the structural system of the pronunciation and the notation coincides with the principle of mutual conversion.

Such a structural transformation system using vowel endings is a structural feature of Korean. If such a feature is available in the heading of the dictionary, it is expected to improve efficiency in Korean language education. One of the reasons why I think Korean spelling is difficult is to memorize the 'word basic form that the notation can't display the pronunciation properly' and also to search the dictionary by the basic form.

For example, the vowel ending, {overlay}, can be summarized as follows.

Table 5 below shows the structure of vowel endings-notation and pronunciation matching of vowel endings {cover}.

division Word conjugation Of notation and pronunciation
Interconversion Equation Remarks Grinding iron notation {Cover}
[Ct] + [o] = [ct] [ㅍ] of the iron notation
The sum of [ㅇ] is pronounced
Realized with [ Wrought iron notation
Pronunciation [Duffer] Equation Establishment: Action by Zero Sound Properties of Skeleton [ㅇ]
Theorem: There is a mutual transformation between the left term [ㅍ] + [ㅇ] and the right term [[] of the equation

According to Table 5, it can be seen that the verb that satisfies the conditions of the vowel ending utilization is a structural system that is interconverted between the pronunciation of the iron and the pronunciation. The condition of the vowel ending utilization form is that the word with the stem support meets the vowel ending.

The interconversion structure of the phonetic pronunciation is not only in the verb but also in the verb. In other words, when a survey starts with vowels and is utilized, the interconversion structure of the phonetic pronunciation is realized.

A survey that begins with a vowel is a form of {-i} or {-}, such as {-yi / ga} or {-/}, that is, a form in which a supportive sound of a message can be downloaded. Investigations {-, /,-,-, etc. are {-,-,--} if there is a support at the end of the statement, {-,-,-if there is no support. }, And I would like to say that {-i,-, -eun}, etc., is a collection investigation. I would like to say that the form using this is called 'vowel investigation type' or 'yeonum utilization type'.

An example of the use of vowel surveys in a statement is that the statement {life} becomes {life} (107) by being used as a survey {-//}. {Life}, a vowel survey application, becomes [Salmi] (108) by the tone. The same is true even when there is only one base, for example, the noun {flower} is a form where the vowel survey utilization type is {flowers} and the string is [skewer].

Therefore, the vowel ending usage of the word and the vowel survey usage of the dictation can be summed up by properly displaying the information of the sound of the basal sound.

1.2. 7 species  Grammar comparison

Yeonyeon pronunciation can be seen as a natural phenomenon to revitalize the sound of the sound. Referring to FIG. 3, the syllable first sound 305 realizes the essential property of the consonant because it is the primary place of the consonant, but the supporting sound may be described as realizing the secondary property of the consonant as a second place. Thus, it can be said that the consonant of the bearing is directed to move to the first sound of the next syllable at all times when the consonant is possible (306). This is referred to as 'the original position (in-situ) orientation-foreignization orientation' (306). In other words, consonants tend to be realized as the first sound of a syllable. Yeonye pronunciation can be explained by the nature of these consonants.

For example, the ruptured sound [발음] is different from the articulation and sound shape of [첫] of the first sound and [ㅂ] of the basal sound in the pronunciation of [bap]. The first sound [ㅂ] is intact rupture, but the standoff sound [뿐] only prevents the sound of vowels in the seat of the lips can not rupture completely. That is, the first sound is all three stages of the bursting action 'close-jim-bursting', but the support sound is only 'close'.

While these articulated sounds are sometimes referred to as 'overtones' and 'overtones' (see Chung Young-chan, 『Korean Phonology,』 Korean Culture History, 1997, p. 34), in this description, we can say “mipa sound” and “rupture sound”. have. This is because the unbroken buzzing sound [ㅂ] (307) goes to the first sound of a syllable beginning with vowels and can be seen to have the property of realizing complete rupture. In '{Bob}: [ㅂㅏ ㅂㅇ l]: [Barbie]' (308), which shows how the sound is realized, in the process of time, the support sound [ㅂ] is combined with the [ㅇ] of the vowel ending [Yi]. You can see the process of becoming the first sound of syllable.

In essence, consonants can reveal all of their identities before the vowel (the first syllable), but after the vowel (the backing) the articulation is limited. Therefore, the consonants in the position of the basal sound, if they meet the syllables that begin with vowels, it is a softening effect that moves to the first sound of the vowel syllables.

Another characteristic can be seen in the bass sound in Korean, which is a phenomenon in the layered support. Overlap is limited to the seventh juxtaposition, but only one of the overlaps is pronounced, but if it is a consonant, both consonants are pronounced.

Overlapping consists of [a] line, [a] line, [b] line, [b], bh, and [r] line, Therefore, there are ten in all. All of them reveal their own sounds through softening.

This is the advantage of the consonant method, and it is the principle and grammar that the bass sound is free from the seven-jong method, which is restricted in pronunciation. Such a pronunciation method is called 'yeonmyeon'. And we will say that the conjugation type pronounced by the consonant method is 'yeonmyeon type'.

The twenty-seven consonants of Korean notation can be explained on the basis of the consonant method. 4 shows that the basis of 27 bearings of the basic form of the notation is in the consonant method (407). For example, the sound of the support of the word {flower} (403) is {cr} is not known in [ko] (403). It can be confirmed that the sound of support is [vo] through the phonetic pronunciation [skewer] (405) of consonant conjugation {flowers}.

Thus, 27 kinds of basal sounds of different basic forms in the notation can be said to be based on conjugated conjugations (407), and consonant conjugations have a feature that is consistent with notation and pronunciation. In other words, it is difficult to explain the problem of pronunciation constraints in the seven-jong method unless the consonant method is established.

Therefore, Korean standoff sound is operated by the complementary relationship 401 between the consonant method and the seven-jong method. This is because the consonant method does not apply to the condition that the seventh law is applied, and the seventh law is not applicable to the condition where the consonant method is applied.

In terms of the type of support, the seven-jong method is limited to seven, but the soft-sound method realizes all 27 except for the use of anomalies. Therefore, since the seven-jong method is a subset of the consonant method, the seven-jong method is in a relationship 402 that is included (included) in the consonant method.

If so, it is necessary to consider which law is the primary legal entity for explaining the Korean word form, and which law is effective in explaining the word form first.

The basic form is a notation restricted by the seven species method, and it can be explained that all of the support sounds are based on the consonant method (407). Therefore, rather than the basic form of the word that is restricted by the seven species law, the consonant form of the word preserved by the consonant method can be considered as the fundamental form.

In FIG. 4, the ground of the sound of {clear} [Makta] (404) is [ㄹㄱ] can not be found in the pronunciation of [Makta], but can only be found in the pronunciation [malga-] (406). Since there is a pronunciation of [Malga-] in the yin-yum method, it is possible to reveal the basic structure of {clear} by inserting the [ㄹ] support despite the [makta]. In other words, if the result of compressing (abbreviating) two syllables called [malga-] into one syllable is {kum-}, it seems that the soft form has more circularity than the basic form.

Thus, if the soft-phone type '{clear' [malga] 'is more basic than the basic type' {clear} [makta] ', it is suitable for explaining the form of Korean words. Rather, it can be seen that it is soft. This is an important aspect of the present invention.

If the bass sound of the primitive '{clear} [Makta]' is rooted in the 'm' clear '[Maga]', the consonant's {clear} is the source of the primitive {clear}. Therefore, the utilization type with {-da} attached to the stem is the basic type, and the use of the Yon-myeon with {-a / word} attached to the stem can be said to be 'source type'. This problem is passed on to the academic research task, but it is emphasized that the consonant use form is as important as the basic form. Therefore, the use of the consonant type in the heading part of the dictionary is meaningful.

If the consonant can better explain the characteristics of the Korean word's notation and pronunciation than the basic form, it replaces the basic term 'stem + {-da}'. Either the "type" or "stem + {-no / er} type" to the default form, or you need to create a new type called "representative utilization type".

This problem is not only limited to the heading part of the dictionary, but is a matter to be discussed in Korean morphology. In the present invention, however, it is better to use a consonant type that is used as a consonant method capable of realizing all 27 types of notation as pronunciation rather than a basic type that is currently subject to the pronunciation restriction of the seven species method.

1.3. Explain the usage of words and phrases to apply to headings and their meanings

In order to see in detail how the notation and pronunciation coincide with yeonmyeon (wrought iron) in the usage form of the verb, I will compare the example of the basic form and the yeonmyeon utilization form. For example, if you compare words by buzzing sound as follows.

Table 6 below shows the comparison between the basic form and the consonant form.

support
sound {-Many}
Basic type {-No / I'm}
Utilization Of {-
Utilization   Remarks  [ㄱ] Eat [eat] ^ Eat [ What ] ^ Ate [ Mug ]  [ㄲ] Bind [mook] ^ Bundle [ What ] ^^ Mute ]  [N] ^ Know [know] ^ I know [ Ara yo ] ^ No [No]  [ㄴㅈ] Sit down ^ Sit down [ Do not sleep ] ^ I sat down Anzni ]  [ㄴㅎ] No [hits] No [No] [No] [ㅎ] potential  [C] Hear [hear] ^ Hear [ Reveal ] ^ Heard [ Drnie ]  [ㄹ] ^ Blow [Blow] ^ Blow [ I break ] Bunny Bunny  [ㄹㄱ] Clear [Makta] ^ It's sunny. ^ It's sunny [ Malgn ]  [ㄹㅁ] Resemble [dam] ^ Resembles [dalma] ^ Resembling [ sweet ]  [ㄹㅂ] Tread on [tapping] ^ Tread on [ Balbayo ] ^^ I stepped on Valvny ]  [ㄹㅌ] Lick ^ Lick [ Haltayo ] ^ I licked [ Haltney ]  [ㄹㄷ] [Euptata] ^^ [ It's fun ] ^^ Elfney ]  [ㄹㅎ] Lose [else] I lose [This] I'm lost. [ㅎ] potential  [ㅁ] Put [dam] ^ ^ [ Tadayo ] ^^ Dame ]  [ㅂ] Pick up ^ Pick up [ Governor ] ^^ Gibnie ]  [ㅂㅅ] None [Upta] ^ No [write it] ^ No [up] Homicide of [ㅅ] in [ㅄ]  [ㅅ] Laugh [Uta] ^ L laugh [Usser] ^ L laugh [ Funny ]  [ㅅㅅ] There is [tata] ^ ^ [ This ] ^^ [ Itsni ]  [ㅈ] Look for [Chatta] ^ Find [Tea] ^ Found [ Chazni ]  [ㅌ] Take [elderly] ^ Take it [ Matayo ] ^^ I'm taking it [ Martney ]  [T] Deep [Gibta] ^ Deep [ Gipper ] ^^ Gifney ]  [ㅎ] Put [nota] Let go [No] Let go [no] [ㅎ] potential

In Table 6, the [] mark is a pronunciation form, the ^ mark is a form in which the pronunciation and pronunciation match.

According to the above Table 6, the basic type {-da} type only coincides with the notation and pronunciation only in the sound of [b, r]. However, the consonant type {-no / uh} or {-(ee)} is not only in the case of {no} or in the same place as {no, lose, let go}. In every word you can see that the notation and pronunciation match.

In the case of {no}, the consonant of [ㅅ] to [ㅆ] is a phenomena caused by a sound connection such as [up + book], where [s] after [ㅂ] (closed sound) becomes an old sound. It's based on the "honoring rules." Therefore, this can be seen that the meaning of the sound to some extent. In this way, the sound is placed in the homonic environment, and the humonic and the groin is referred to as `` homonic groin '' or `` honed sound groin ''.

In addition, the structure shows that the [he] support is used in the case of the support. For example, {like} 's [ㅎ] is not pronounced because it is not consonant. The pronunciation of {like} is [zoa], not [joyo]. [ㅎ] is the same as [ㅇ] in [-No]. Thus, it is structurally indicating that [ㅎ] is potentially contained in [-ah] even though it is consonant and not pronounced as a sound. In this description, I will refer to it as a "potential salary of [he]."

Except for the two special symptom phenomena, such as the symptom consonant phenomena of [ㅅ] or the potential consonant phenomena of [ㅎ], it can be seen that all words have a phonetic notation matching structure.

 In summary, since the consonant vowel mother utilizing type can correctly display the supporting sound information, using this utilizing type as a dictionary search method, it is possible to properly receive the supporting sound information which was not obtained from the basic type. If you provide it as a learning dictionary for people in the spelling process, you can increase the effectiveness of your education. The Korean language has a wise structure, which shows that it is not tied to the pronunciation constraints of the Seven Species Act. All 27 kinds of notation standoffs have a mechanism to realize their own sounds naturally.

The vowel ending conjugations are nonterminal, such as the {-, or}, and terminating, such as the {-a / uh} or the {-oh / uh}. Here are some of the things that can be used for vowel endings:

Table 7 below shows the types of vowel endings.

             Termination Unterminated Dismantling
(Half-end) Haoche
(Excite the ordinary) Body
(Excite the ordinary) {-Ah oh} {-Five} {-No / I don't} {-
{-If} {Ah oh}
{-Arthur / go} etc

According to the above Table 7, three examples of the termination type and two of the non-termination type are illustrated. In the final form, there are 'dissolution' as half-word and 'haoche' and 'hazeche' by raising the ordinary.

John D. grades vary from scholar to scholar, and the expressions of dissolution, Haoche, and Hajache are based on Relative Elevation, a standard Korean grammar of Korean writing by Nam Ki-sim and Ko Young-geun (top publisher, 1996). The term `` examination of exorcism '' refers to Choi Hyun-bae's Korean Letter (Jeongum Culture History, 1929/1991), on page 266, `` Very low (low), executive lower (high), ordinary high (hao), very missing (haphop), It is according to the 'proposition'. According to this, the final {-a / uh} is dismantled in half, and {-o} and {-a / uh} are Haoche and Hajache, which is equivalent to ordinary exaltation.

Among the conjugated forms, the representative ones will be called 'representative use' and we will select one from the final type and the non-end type. In the final form, the {-A / er} form seems to be appropriate in the closing form, but the {-No / er} form is used a lot in everyday life. It may be more convenient to use {-a / uh} as half-words. Unterminated forms include {-(e) ni}. The vowel endings used as the soft-phone type have a {-a / word} line of the ending type and a {-E} line of the connection type, so {-a / word} is the final type.

If you select the representative application form from the consonant application form, you can use the {-A / English} form. However, if one reflects the Korean law, one of the characteristics of Korean, in the representative application form, {-no / uh} seems appropriate. If you don't like it, you can end up with {-a / uh} in half-phrases, naturally except for {-yo}. In the same vein, {-(g)} is appropriate for the non-terminating representative use type.

Of course, the selection of such a representative utilization type is a matter of reconsideration, and further discussion is required if necessary, so it is considered as a provisional selection.

Next, I will explain the usage of the statement. The state where no investigation is attached to the statement is referred to as 'base form' (hereinafter referred to as 'basic form'), and the form in which the investigation is combined with the statement is referred to as 'convention form' (hereinafter referred to as 'conventional form'), I would like to refer to a statement as a 'heading of the word'.

The problem with the word heading is that the notation and pronunciation are often inconsistent with the word heading. For example, the pronunciation of {kitchen} is [fugeum] and the pronunciation of {life} is [sam], so the basic form is different from the pronunciation. Ordinary words like {life, clothes, flowers} are also different in notation and pronunciation.

The following table illustrates the basic form of the meditation and the tympanum based on the sound of the support used for the narration.

Table 8 below shows the comparison between the basic form and the consonant form.

support
sound Basic type
(No investigation) {-This / ga}
uses {-/}
uses   Remarks   A ^ {Happy} [happy] ^ {Happy} [View} ^ {Happy}} Square ]   ㄲ {Out} [night] ^ {Out}} Baki ] ^ {Out} [ Busy ]   ㄱㅅ {Share} [Thursday] {Share} [Thursday] {Share} [throat]  Homonic chords in [ㄳ]   N ^ {Not} [not] ^ {Inside} [no] ^ {Inside} [ Today ]   D ^ {Fire} [fire] ^ {Fire} [beak] ^ {Light}   ㄹㄱ {Chicken} ^ {Chicken} [dang] ^ {Chicken} [ Calligraphy ]   ㄹㅁ {Life} [3] ^ {Life} [ salmi ] ^ {Life} [ Salme ]   M ^ {Dam} [dam] ^ {History} [ Dami ] ^ {Talk}} Damm ]   ㅂ ^ {Home} [home] ^ {House}} Zivi ] ^ {House} [ Jibble ]   ㅂㅅ {Value} [A] {Value} [Gap] {Value} [parse] Homonic chords of s in [ㅄ]   S {Clothes} [o] ^ {Clothes} [come] ^ {Clothes} [ Oslo ]   ㅇ ^ {Bell} [bell] ^ {Paper} [Joy] ^ {Bells} [ Tighten ]   ㅈ {Day} [낟] ^ {Lower} [naji] ^ {Lower} [ Nazle ]   H {Flower} [Tsu] ^ {Flowers} [skewers] ^ {Flowers} [ Kotzl ]   Lol {Kitchen} [Kitchen] ^ {Kitchen} [ Swollen ] ^ {Kitchen} [ Buckle ]   ㅌ {Red bean} [Pad] {Red bean} [pachi] ^ {Red beans} [ Fattle ] [ㅌ] palatalization   ㅍ {Forest} [숩] ^ {Forest}} [bark] ^ {Forests} [ Souffle ]

In Table 8, the ^ mark is a form in which the notation and pronunciation match, and the [] is a soft-sound type.

According to Table 8, [o] and [ko] written in the pronunciation form of {cloth} and {flower} are incorrectly written in the 'c' support, which is because the function of the 'Patent Office Electronic Document Composer' is not good. It is because [c] is not attached to [o]. And [Joy] 's [yi], the pronunciation form of {paper}, is a response to nasal noise.

In addition, as shown in Table 8, the basic form of the telegram does not match the pronunciation and pronunciation in all words except [a, b, d, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅇ] (6). If you put up to [ㄷ], only the seven-jong method of goblin sound matches the pronunciation and pronunciation.

In contrast, the yin-myeon type has the coincidence structure of notation and pronunciation in all words except for [ㅂㅅ] and [ㅌ] buzzing sound. It is a consonant consonant with [ㅅ] as [ㅆ]. This has been discussed in the description of the basic form and the soft form of the word of Table 6. In the case of [팥] as the sound of [ㅌ] as the sound of [papa], [ㅌ, c] is palatalized in front of [I], so I want to say that it is palatalized.

Therefore, in the consonant conjugation type of {-i /-} of the conjecture, the consonant conjugation type of all the consonants has a notation and pronunciation matching structure except for the consonant consonant and palate consonant consonants.

As described above, in the examples of the consonant utilization type of verbs and utterances in Tables 7 and 8, the consonants such as the ending {-a / er,-)} and the survey {-/} are examined. We will briefly summarize the structure of the utilization type.

Table 9 below shows the structure of the consonant utilization type.

Kind of note Example of soft use Softening A sound target (1) general penis 27 kinds of standoffs except 3 special methods
Example: {Flower} [Skewers] Bass sound (jongseong) consonants as the first consonant (secondary) of the next syllable Buzz
27 kinds
all (2) special
Penis A) homization
liaison Closed sound following [ㅅ]: {none} [write it] [ㅂ] followed by [ㅂ] as [ㅆ] B) palatalization
liaison [ㅌ] support before [this].
Example: {field}} Consonant with [ㅌ] as [ㅊ] C) potential
liaison Being a [ㅇ] sound of [ㅎ]: {like} [Joah] Conquered [ㅎ] as [ㅇ]

According to the above Table 9, it can be seen that all 27 kinds of support sounds defined by spelling have a conjugation type structure. Therefore, if the education on the structure of the consonant utilization type in the Korean word form is strengthened, the practicality of the consonant utilization type can be improved. In general, the teaching of consonants can easily be accomplished in a few hours, in the form of wrought iron and consonants when vowel endings and vowel surveys are connected. And because the special choonmyeon method is a reflection of the nature of the sound fundamentally, people who have learned Korean as a native language may be able to grab some sense of the special choon in the feeling of sound. In addition, since the sound properties are reflected according to the environment in which the sound is placed, they can be solved by easy-to-understand education because they are realized only in limited conditions. And this can also be solved by linking to the grammar. Searching the dictionary may suggest a special symptom in the dictionary's instructions, so don't worry too much about it.

The survey intends to emphasize the well established mechanisms for making soft sounds. That is, the survey {-, /,-, /-, etc., type {-,-,--} if the end syllable has a support, {-, -Is separated by-. For example, the {flower} with the base is used as {flower, the flower, the flower}, and the {tree} without the base is used as {tree, the tree, the tree}. The survey {-i,-, -eun} and the like are referred to as vowel surveys, and the {-ga,-,-and} are called consonant surveys. Here you can see the special structure of the survey. In other words, vowel surveys are well-equipped to make the statement more convenient.

One thing to consider is the way in which words are examined in word form. In the school grammar, investigation is regarded as an independence form, so the statement becomes an independence form and the investigation becomes an independence form. However, research is also dependent and academically controversial, unlike school grammar.

In this explanation, we see the use of the word {life} as the use of the word. This is intended to be in the same context as the case of words. In other words, as the ending is attached to the stem to become the word of the conjugation type, the statement is to see the state of the investigation as the conjugation type word. In essence, there is still academic controversy about the concept of words, but it seems reasonable to view the forms of use in which the message is investigated as 'use words'.

In particular, all the words also have the feature of being a verb if you add {-to}, which is called a descriptive check. For example, the conjugation type of {flower} to {flower} is {flower}, so it is a word used as a verb. Also, there are too many cases of using adjectives or verbs by adding {-to} or {-hand} depending on nouns. For example, {happy} becomes the adjective {happy}, and {study} becomes the verb {study}. Since the statement is also used as a verb, I would like to see the conjugation form attached to the investigation as a conjugation word in the same context.

The expression {flower is} is used as {flower-nee, flower-go, flower-cotton}, so the form of {flower-} can be seen here as a stem of the stem. The statement can also be part of the stem, depending on the type of application. Therefore, it can be seen that the utilization forms of the statement are diverse and complicated, and the utilization forms of the survey should be considered together.

In the Korean dictionary, which is used to search by all utilization forms, the word usage form can be considered as a word utilization form that can be uploaded as a representative heading or appendix in the heading section, or can be used as a query word searched by the user freely by text or voice.

1.4. Conjugation Real fish liver  interval Source  Concept formulation and application method

The Korean dictionary, which can be searched for all conjugations of words, including conjugations of the consonants and pronunciations of the seven kinds of consonants, will be the most ideal dictionary.

In order to reflect the characteristics of the Korean language with the use of various and delicate words in the dictionary, it is necessary to construct a dictionary to search by utilizing all words. However, if you want to put all the words, such as verbs and verses in the headings as a heading, even a paper dictionary as well as an electronic dictionary can not afford the amount. In addition, there is no need to put up all the use forms that have the same basic meaning and vary greatly in the form of application. Therefore, you only need to have a way to search by all the forms of the word (function).

Therefore, the present invention is to create and present a method that can be searched in all the utilization forms of pronunciation and phonetic (speech language), including notation.

Existing dictionaries generally use the basic form according to the notation as the heading, and even if it is a pronunciation dictionary, only the pronunciation of the basic form is excluded. Among the pronunciation dictionaries, for example, in the Korean Broadcasting Corporation, `` Standard Korean Phonetic Dictionary '' (Engmungak, 1993), the basic form of a word is used as a heading and pronunciation information is provided. It is made visible and does not provide an explanation.

Therefore, in the present invention, a general Korean dictionary having a heading part and a meaning pool part is to find a method of searching by utilizing all words by adding a search method by inputting a phonetic type and a phonetic language together with a notation type. In order to realize such a method, a method of morphological analysis based on a conventional notation and a method of morphological separation of a pronunciation type are required.

Therefore, the present invention has devised a new morphological separation method that separates stems into actual pronunciation forms of word-utilized forms, without using the morphological analysis method that separates the mother and the investigation as in the conventional morphological analysis method. This is a method of classifying all the word utilization forms of pronunciation and notation into several types to set up 'common phonetic forms' and setting them in the composition of the heading part of the dictionary.

'Common Sound' refers to the sound form that several utilization forms have in common. For example, in the pronunciation form [singers, horses, horses, horses, etc.] have a common phonetic form of [horses]. Therefore, the common phonetic form [malga-] is set in the heading part, and when a query (search word) is entered in a word utilization type such as [gasga, malgaco, horsegage, horse, etc.], the heading part can be found. . In other words, the common phonetic [marga-] converges all of the conjugations such as [gaga, malgako, malagai, magane].

In the notation form, the existing 'base stem form' (hereinafter, referred to as 'basic stem') becomes a common phonetic form. For example, all utilization forms of the notation {{clear, clear, clear, clear, clear}, etc., simply have one basic stem, {clear-}).

Since the common phonetic forms are realized with real sounds, the key idea is to set common phonetic forms of the phonetic and phonetic forms of words in the dictionary searched by all utilization forms, and use them in the heading part of the dictionary. Here, I would like to put it as a theoretical basis by arranging with the concept of 'common phonetic form of phonetic form' appearing in word utilization phenomenon. The common phonetic form of the phonetic form is a concept that has the same context as the stem, and can be said to be a set of heteromorphic forms of the phonetic stem of the conjugation type. Since this common sound form is realized with real sounds, it is intended to say that it is a 'utilized real sound stem' (hereinafter referred to as 'real sound stem'). This is to find the concept of the actual phonetic stem appearing in the utilization form in the invention.

Therefore, in the present invention, the stem is to be divided into the conventional basic stem according to the notation and the pronunciation between the pronunciation type according to the utilization type. Real word stem is the part where the phonetic form is immutable in the utilization form of a word. 'Invariant part' is the meaning borrowed from the concept of stem. The concept of the stem is an immutable form, which refers to the central form of the vocabulary that excludes parts that change, such as affinity or survey.

Existing basic stemming is restricted from pronunciation of 7 kinds and cannot show the sound type of actual pronunciation. The existing basic stemming concept refers to an immutable practical form, such as {Mok-}, when it is pronounced differently. For example, {eating, eaten, eaten, eaten, eaten}, etc., in the notation form {eat-} is always identified by the form of {eat-}, so {muck-} becomes an unchanged common form and can be defined as stem. However, in phonetic forms, the unchanging sound form in conjugations such as [Muger, Mugger, Murco, Murugdo, etc.] becomes [Murger-], and in conjugation such as [Joy, bruise, bruise, bruise], etc. The sound type is [snooze].

Therefore, the real words are different from the existing basic words defined by the spelling notation and are pronunciation type words of words used in pronunciation form, and the actual sound forms that are responsible for lexical meaning as sound forms in which the utilization type of words is actually pronounced. It is a stem. In the field of speech processing, including electronic dictionaries, there are times when it is necessary to analyze a form using only a pronunciation type. In this case, it is reasonable to use such a real ear stem.

In addition, real Chinese will be needed to study the pronunciation form academically. Traditionally, morphology studies of Korean linguistics have been used to describe spelling phenomena with the basic notation of conventional notation, since spelling has been the main object of writing. However, as the storage and reproduction of sounds become easier, and the technology that can be freely used through various media is improved, a morphological study on the sound form of pronunciation based on the speech language is newly requested. In other words, it is difficult to cover all of the actual sound forms of the utilized form, which are varied and delicately changed with only one of the conventional notation basic words.

Therefore, in the present invention, the concept of the fish stem is divided into the basic stem of the notation type and the practical verb between the pronunciation type. This method defines the invariant part as the utilization type real sound stem in the usage type of the pronunciation type as the invariant part is regarded as the stem in the basic type of the notation type. Finding the invariant part of the phonetic form is a bit complicated, but if you use the syllables in syllables, you can easily find the invariant part. However, if the consonants and vowels smaller than the syllable units are used as the units, they may be displayed differently. For example, [munch-] can be further defined as [munch-] and [malg-] can be defined as [mal-].

For example, in the phonetic form of {eat, eat, eat}, [mugger-] is an immutable phonetic form. In addition, in the phonetic form of {eat, eat, eat}, [mug, mug, and root], [mug-] is an immutable sound form. Also, in the pronounced form of {eating, eating, but eating}, [eating-] is an immutable sound type. And in the phonetic form of [eat, eat, eat], [yoke-] is an immutable phoneme. Thus, the stem of stem can be seen in four forms such as [Muger / mug-/ ink-/ yoke-]. This includes the traditional notation stem {Mock-}.

 Since the statement is used with {-ida} attached to it and with investigation, it is intended to apply the same concept as the real word stem. For example, {life is life, if life} is pronounced [salmi, salmin, salmi ramen], so the real stem can be set to [salmi-]. The pronunciation of {life, life, life} is [salty, thin, live], so it can be regarded as "salm-". Since {life, life only} is pronounced [samdo, samman], the real word stem can be seen as [sam-]. Therefore, it is assumed that there are three real stems. Including the existing notation stem {life}, all the stems can be said in four forms, such as [life- / salmi- / salme- / sam-].

Next we can come up with another concept. For example, the actual form of mutant [merger- / mug- / ink- / bruise-] has a common phonetic form of [mer-], and [life- / salmi- / salme- / sam-] etc. [sa-] There is a common sound type. Since the common phonetic forms are the sound forms that are the roots between the real words, we will say 'the source between the real words' (hereinafter referred to as 'the stem root sound'). All stems, such as this form of conventional notation basic stem and real verb, have stem roots.

The sound form that is the root of the stem has the characteristic that the sound form does not change even in irregular utilization, so it can be used as an important concept. For example, the stem root sound in the form of {listening, listen} or phonetic form [drun, reveal, lift] in irregular utilization forms has a form of {de-}.

Therefore, all the conjugations are characterized as being based on the sound form of the stem source sound. In other words, utilization can be established only within the scope of the stem. Thus, stem roots also play a role in limiting the search range of all applications. If the root source is found first in the headword search of the electronic dictionary, and then the stem stem is searched, the scope of the search can be narrowed within the range of the stem root.

The concept of real word stem and stem root sound that can analyze and classify all types of words can be summarized as follows.

Table 10 below shows an example of establishing a concept of real stem and stem root.

division Application example Real
(Between variable words)
Common sound Stem Stem source Word Notation {It's sunny, it's sunny, it's sunny, it's sunny,
It's sunny, sunny, sunny, sunny}  {Sunny-} 1 branch [hemp] Phonetic
(Speech language) [Go, go, go, go to Malgata]  [Not sure]
5 kinds


[Laughs, speak, speak]  [Mag-] [Speech word, word, word only]  [Words-] [Makta, Maktani, Makchi, Makchiman]  [membrane-] [Mucks, ruined, ruined]  [Net-] Statement Notation {Life, life, life, life, life only,
Life, life, even life, life}  {Life-} 1 branch [four] Phonetic
(Speech language) [Salmi, Salmini, Salmi]  [salmi-]
4 kinds

[Fine, live, live]  [Salme-] [Salme, salme, salmedo]  [Salme] [Three, three thousand]  [three-]

According to the above Table 10, the conventional notation basic stem is one such as {clear-} or {life-} in all utilization forms by verbs and verbs, but the actual stem has five forms. And root root sounds encompassing notation and pronunciation were analyzed as having [E] and [E], respectively.

In this way, it is possible to classify all utilization forms by separating the forms between the actual words. For example, all the usage forms of the representative utilization form {clear} (clear) are used with one form among six real speech stems such as [clear-/ malga-/ malg-/ mal- / mak-/ net-]. Since it is classified into six types of word utilization having the representative utilization type {clear}, all the utilization forms can be accommodated between these six real words. For example, the conjugation type [if messed up] is analyzed to have [manne-] between actual words.

The sound form between real words is defined in syllable units. That is, one consonant is not marked separately. For example, consonants do not appear independently of syllables, such as [b-] or [b-] or [ㅁ-] of [salm-]. Consonants can not achieve the sound alone (syllables) because it does not match between real words. It also takes into account the idea that this would be convenient for the mechanical voice processing of electronic devices. The theory that consonants or vowels cannot be syllables alone lies in the theory of 'disciplinary' in the original text of Hunminjeongeum, a commentary on Hangeul creation. However, by using dictation and arranging stems by consonants and vowels, the stem form can be used more comprehensively.

Real stems seem complicated because they have many different forms compared to the basic stem of a notation with only one form, but this can be rather characteristic. Many Korean words are irregularly used words. Even in this case, the real word is set to the stem of the actual pronunciation that is used as all words are pronounced, so you can search the exact utilization type of all words among the real word. It is. Therefore, when used in the dictionary has the feature that all words can be searched correctly. All words used in the dictionary, such as verbs, spoken words, and formulas, are analyzed in real words and have the same result as using a morph analyzer that analyzes 100% completely.

In addition, there may be a case where there is a problem similar to that of the 'homonym'. The sound form between real words may overlap with other real words. For example, when searching for {sam} (noun), [sam-] ('sam' of 'life') is searched for and overlapped. This is not a problem because it is so large that the user can hide it. In other words, it does not matter much in the same context that there are many 'homonym' in words.

If a representative form is defined among real words, the verb can be selected from among these forms as a final form. It is also appropriate that the statement selects the phenotypes that are used as {-i} because it includes all the phenotypes that are used as descriptive search {-is}. For example, [life] and {kitchen}.

The description of the construction of the electronic dictionary using the real sound stem, the analysis of the real sound fish, and the analysis of the root sound of the stem will be described in more detail later in the second step.

(Step 2)

2. Korean Dictionary Dictionary

The second step is about the practice of making a dictionary, and I will explain how to apply a word-using form in a dictionary. Therefore, the dictionary to search for the basic type as the utilization type, the dictionary to set the heading itself as the utilization type, and the dictionary to search for all the utilization types of words will be described.

2.1. Korean dictionary to search basic headings

In the heading of the dictionary, we will explain how to use the consonant type as a search term. This is the simplest way to apply the consonant application to the heading of a dictionary. This method keeps the existing Korean dictionary system, but finds the basic form of the heading by placing the consonant form in front of the heading. It can be used in both paper and electronic dictionaries.

This is a way for people who do not know the spelling information of the basic form, for example, knowing the pronunciation of the basic form [Makta] or [Let's Say], but {clear}. If you use {clear}, which is a conjugation type of {clear}, as a search word, you can easily recognize the information that the support sound is [ㄹ, ㄱ]. It is the structure of Ma-d-a. Therefore, when searching for the dictionary {ma} and then searching for 'ㄹ' and 'ㄱ' in turn, the word {clear} is found, so the word {clear} can be easily searched.

It is a structure that can be easily understood with a little training of soft iron and iron iron. If the term is a verb, you can use the vowel endings {-h / a} or {-h / h}, or if you use the vowel check {-i / a} or {-/}.

This will be described with reference to the example of FIG. 5.

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a search term using a consonant conjugation type according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, the {conjugation} 501, which is a consonant conjugation type, is placed first in the search word, the arrow 502 guides the heading term found in the search word, and the {clear} 503 is a basic type. It is a raised term. Next, the part-of-speech 504 is written down, and the number 505 such as (1) indicates a meaning part. The term {clear} (503) or less is a method of using an existing dictionary framework.

The lower item [Song] 506 is configured to be searchable by pronunciation. The search term just guides {clear} (507) after the arrow to get to {clear} (501). This is because it doesn't know the spelling of the word 'clear' so it can be searched by the word as it is pronounced. Thus, the symbol '[]' is used as a sign of pronunciation. In fact, in the dictionary configuration, the search term {clear} 501 is placed below the pronunciation type [singer] 506.

The search word {clear} 501 need not be separately pronounced. By guiding the phonetic pronunciation or the soft iron method in the dictionary guide, it is not necessary to separately display the pronunciation of the search word. However, the heading {clear} (503) can also be pronounced [makta].

In the case of the verb search {Tread} (508), the heading to search is presented as {Tread} (509). The conventional verb basic form {to step on} is an artificial word that is not actually used, so instead of the {verb} (509) is added. Thus, in the example, "we step on the ground every day," and the verb uses {steps on} (510). If the original verb {tread} is used as a heading, the sentence should say, "We tread on the ground every day," because it is unreasonable to make a sentence that is not actually used.

In addition, a separate search word item [balbayo] (511) is written {step only} (512) after the arrow to go to {step} 508.

In the case of {quick} 513 in FIG. 5, the absence of a search word and an arrow is because parts of speech of this word are absent. There are no search terms in adverbs, because the search terms are posted in conjugation styles that use only verbs and verbs. In this sense, a table (514) such as '/' is written after the heading {quick}.

{Life is} (515} is an example of using a search term as a conjugation type to a verb, but the lower part is the same as an example of a prognosis. Post it as a heading.

In this way, even in the dictionary using the search term {clear} (501) of the consonant utilization type, the basic type {clear} (503) can be found directly. Since the stem of the search term and the heading is the same as {clear-}, you can find {clear} and {clear} together in almost the same place. Just consider that the heading {clear} (503) is after the search term {clear} (501). Such a method can be presented as a method of finding a dictionary in a dictionary guide.

2.2. Korean Dictionary with word conjugation

I would like to explain how to abandon the use of the basic forms of words as the headings of dictionaries, and how to create Korean dictionaries using the headings themselves as consonants. This creates a new dictionary framework that can be applied to both paper and electronic dictionaries.

6 will be described with reference to an example.

6 is a model diagram using the terminology of the consonant conjugation type according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figure 6, it is configured to be found as a pronunciation type 615 together with the notation type 601. The information on the meaning is presented in the notation, and the pronunciation is only configured to guide the notation.

In FIG. 6, the conventional word basic form is excluded and the consonant conjugation type {clear} 601 is used as the headword itself. This is a bit awkward because it is a form of honor, but I think of the merits of revealing the characteristics of respect. In particular, this dictionary structure is envisioned to be used as an educational dictionary for learning Korean. If it is unfamiliar and not appropriate to use honorific words as headings, they may be reserved. Therefore, the verb conjugation type {tread} (608) below is illustrated in half.

In the heading section, () is an example that can be used to refer to the utilization type {clear} (602) and the existing basic type {clear} (603) for reference. The part-of-speech guide is indicated as <adjective> (604), using '(1)' as the meaning number (605).

Since the headword is conjugation, the sentence of the meaning part (607) excludes the basic form and states it as conjugation, such as 'clean'. In other words, there is a burden to use the same word as the headword in the meaning. It would be a research problem to make this fit, but the example also suggested 'the water is clear' (606). This is the ending of honor.

However, in order to fit the word for '(clear, clear)' (602, 603), which are placed in parentheses as an appendix of the heading, at the end of the meaning, each sentence ends, such as '(clean, clean)' (607). It is added in (). That is, at the conclusion of the sentence, 'I am agreeing with the meaning of the phrase: {clean} for {clear}, {clean} for {clear}, and {clean} for {clear}.

Thus, in the solution to the meaning of the three termination forms. In other words, the concluding word for '{clear} (clear, clear)' is the response to '{clean} (clean, clean)'. There is no difficulty if you can tell how to read it well in the dictionary, but there is a drawback that the text looks a bit complicated. This semantic can be read in three sentences, shown in the table below.

Table 11 below shows a model of the meaning of verbs in the dictionary that uses conjugation as the heading (Fig. 6).

division Conclusion type Headword (Typical): Clear " I do not mix any foreign objects or dirty, clean." Accessory 1: clear "There is no foreign matter or dirty things are clean." Part 2: Utilization Type: Clear (Basic) "There is no foreign matter or dirty things are clean".

According to Table 11 above, there are two adjunct forms according to the heading {clear}. If the heading {clear} is the ending of the grand finalism, the first part of the word {clear} is the ending of the ending, and the basic type {clear} of the second part is the ending of the written form (formal). Writing the meanings according to this table is worth considering under the premise that there is an advantage in electronic dictionaries that can process a lot of information. The first part of the application form {Clear}, which is used in the form of {clear-west} or {clear-do}, is also referred to as the reference form because it also serves as the ending form of the end of the fish. {Clear} is presented as a secondary type because it has the importance as a basic form and the terminology used traditionally, and its meaning may want to know.

In a word, instead of placing only one of the clear {{clear}} or {clear} as the heading, and putting the first and the second sub-conjugated forms give the information of the conjugation type, it is not unfamiliar to users familiar with the existing dictionary heading basic form. It is consideration. It is considered that the method of using the accessory utilization type will be more advantageous in the electronic dictionary.

Rather than uploading the first and second subtypes, it may be better to put just {clear} as the heading. Also, after getting acquainted with the dictionary using the conjugation form as a heading, you may place only one conjugation form of the consonant, such as {clear} or {clear}.

Next, we will look at the case of the verb heading {Tread} (608). Unlike the heading {Clear} (601) above, it is an example of using the half-word conjugation as the heading. And the first subsidiary conjugation type raised {step} with respect, and the second subconjugated conjugation type posted {tread} the present type. The conventional verb basic form is {tread}, except that it is uploaded as {tread} because the verb basic form is an artificial word organized artificially. The three-part presentation of the meaning and example sentences (609, 610) is the same as the adjective (606, 607), so the explanation is reduced.

Also, in the verbal form [balba] 616, the arrow points to {tread} 608 when the arrow is found in the phonetic form, to move on to the heading {tread} 608. In addition, since the adverbs {fast} 513 and 514 use what is described with reference to FIG. 5, there is no need to add explanation.

In the case of {life} (611), which uses the term of the verb, the structural flow is the same as that of the adjective or verb. The only difference is that the survey was used instead of the mother. The headline {life is} is a use of {-yi / ga}, which is called the main subject. The first and second subsidiary types {life, life} (612) are the purpose of the survey {-and} and the basic type {life} without the use of research.

However, there is an unnatural aspect of the meaning part (613, 614) of {Life}. Therefore, it may be considered that the survey utilization type is only used as a search word method for searching the basic type, as in {life} 515 of FIG. 5. In this case, the terminology becomes the headword of the conjugation, and the statement becomes the search term for the terminology of the conjugation, so it is inconsistent, but it can be a practical way for users who are not used to the conjugation of the word.

Next, I will suggest how to use notation and pronunciation as search terms while using conjugation. This is to explain the dictionary search by letter and pronunciation in the electronic dictionary. An example is shown in FIG. 7.

7 is a heading partial model diagram for searching by text and voice according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7 shows the term {clear} (701) with the term verb conjugation. Then we attached the pronunciation of the heading [singing] (702), which is to find when searching by pronunciation. In paper dictionaries, it is used to supplement pronunciation information. The next symbol '/' 703 is a mark distinguishing the utilization form and the basic form. That is, the basic type {clear} (704) and the pronunciation type [makta] (705) are distinguished from the headings and placed as an appended form. Here, [makta] is a pronunciation type for use when searching by voice, but in a paper dictionary is to play the role of giving pronunciation information. The next symbol ';' (706) denotes the end of the heading, which is used only in the electronic dictionary to search only before the symbol.

The use of the conjugation type and the basic type in the heading part here is intended to allow both forms to be used as search terms in the electronic dictionary. If you divide the pronunciation type, it is four types. The basic form of the meaning solver made the area of 'Reference' (708) and simply write down the meaning and example sentences one by one.

Also, the verb basic form is not used because it has a problem, and instead of {tread}, {tread} [tuck] (709, 710) is used.

In addition, Cheon suggested the use of the form as a search term to find the basic form. Therefore, it can be searched by the use type {life} [salmi] (711, 712), and also by the basic type {life} [sam] (713, 714). Therefore, the information on the meaning of the statement is presented only the basic type (715), which was presented in the model for finding the basic type as the utilization type in FIG. This method is equivalent to using the system of predicates in the existing dictionary, but finding the headings in a conjugation form.

The terminology of FIG. 7 is used as a term for the conjugation type, and the conviction uses the existing dictionary system as it is using only the conjugation type as a search word. Thus, while reducing the change, solved the problem of difficult spelling. In addition, the problems with the basic forms of verbs were improved (709, 710), and the application of verbal forms was made possible.

When applying the various methods described above to the electronic dictionary, it is possible to create a search method by text only and a dictionary search by text and voice.

In the configuration of the electronic dictionary, the configuration shown in FIG. 9 is used as the basic configuration. For example, if you don't need a speech dictation, you can exclude it from the configuration.

2.3. Korean electronic dictionary to search by all types of text and voice

The ideal Korean dictionary can be seen as a dictionary that can be searched by all forms of text and voice. In other words, the Korean dictionary is not only searched by the basic form of the word, but also by the phonetic language. Questions can be spoken or written, so these dictionaries are the most convenient Korean dictionaries. In this section, we will present how to create such a dictionary.

Korean word utilization forms are diverse and delicate, so the number and complexity of them is very difficult to make a dictionary. However, if all the word utilization forms are spelled out to be spelled, the method of searching for the headword, which is the basic form of the word, is already commercialized. This is true only if the letter must be typed correctly to match the notation.

Such a dictionary can be constructed by using a search method using a common form of various utilization forms. For example, the utilization forms of {clear} are very diverse, such as {clear, clear, sunny, but sunny, clear}, but all of these utilization forms have a common form of {clear-}. Therefore, no matter what you ask, such as {clear, clear, clear}, you only need to find the basic type {clear} with the {clear-} stem.

 The same applies to the use of a statement. {Value} is used as a noun {value}, if {value is a value, a value, a value, only a value, a value is a value,} and the like, but there are many common forms of {value}. Based on this common form, various utilization forms can find the heading {value}.

This method has the limitation that the notation of stem or body must be typed in letters correctly for spelling. In other words, the disadvantage of the existing electronic dictionary is that it cannot be searched by inputting a phonetic form of a phonetic form or inputting it as a sound of a voice language.

Accordingly, the present invention is to search for all types of utilization of the word, at the same time to propose a method that can be searched by inputting not only the letters of the notation type, but also the letters of the phonetic or phonetic language.

Words entered as phonetic letters are called 'pronounced letters' or' pronounced words', and words entered as phonetic words are 'phonetic words' and words entered as spelling letters to match the spelling' I would say 'notation type' or 'notation type'.

Phonetic phonetic representation of the word is to receive the phonetic language and write it as a character, on the contrary, the output of the phonetic language is to read the phonetic transcription of the phonetic language. The speech recognition apparatus can convert the phonetic language into phonetic characters, which is easier to dictate the phonetic language than the phonetic language because it only dictates the phonetic language. It is more difficult to convert phonetic languages to notational characters because they must meet the difficult rules of notation.

In the dictionary that searches for all utilization forms of words, the user asks questions with the utilization forms of the words (hereinafter referred to as 'questions') that the user decides at will. Therefore, it is not expected at all which type of input will be entered as a query. In particular, the conditions for entering text or phonetic language must also be premised.

Therefore, when the utilization form of a word is input into a query of a character or a voice, it is difficult to apply a conventional form analysis method that separates a mother and a survey. Because there is an imperfect aspect of existing morph analyzers that analyzes spelling-type letters, however, it is less effective to develop a morph analyzer that analyzes endings and investigations, especially with the pronunciation of words used by voice. Because.

Therefore, in the present invention, without using a conventional affinity or morphological analysis method (morphological analyzer), by fixing the invariable part of the actual use of the word pronunciation pronunciation to analyze and separate the stem or root (base) of the utilization We want to use the method. This uses the concept of 'real sound stem' described in section 1.4. That is, in the present invention, the concept of stemming is divided into basic stemming of notation and real pronunciation of pronunciation. Unlike the existing basic stemming concept, the invariant part is defined as 'real sound word (utilized sound sound word)' in this form. Specific examples and explanations between the real words are given before and after Table 10 above.

Here we will present a dictionary model of headings, with some words as examples. The word {eat} has a {muck-} as the basic stem of the notation, and the pronunciation type used as {eat, eat, eat} is pronounced as [merger, merger, mergerra], so [merger-] There is also a real word stem, and the pronunciation type of {eat, eat, eat} becomes [mug, mug, root], and there is a real word stem, [mug-]. Also, in {eating, eating, eating}, the pronunciation type of [eating, eating, eating] is [eum-] being a real stem, and the {eating, eating, eating} pronunciation type of [eating, eating, eating] Esau is an actual term. Therefore, there are four kinds of actual stems of {eat} like [Muger / mug-/ eat-/ yoke-].

Thus, all forms of use of the word {eat} must have one of these four real words. For example, the conjugation type [yoke] has a gamma stem of [joong-], and the conjugation of [dwelling] has a gamma stem of [merger-]. Therefore, if four real words are set in the heading item, it can be searched in the heading item even if the query comes in by any usage.

However, among these four utilization stems, [Muk-], [Muger], and [Mug-] share three [ㅁ ㅓㄱ] in order. Therefore, they have a phoneme common type [ㅁ ㅓㄱ]. This will be referred to as 'common phoneme of phoneme' (hereinafter referred to as 'phoneme common phoneme'). This is equivalent to the result of abbreviation around common phonemes. If the other one is listed as phoneme common phoneme, it is the same as [ㅁㅓ ㅇㄴ]. Therefore, the four real words [muk-, mugger-, mug-, and munch-] are abbreviated to the two phoneme common types [ㅁ [ㄱ, ㅁㅓ ㅇㄴ]. This is summarized as follows. The context is the same in the case of a statement, with the example of the word {life} here.

Table 12 below compares the common phoneme and the phoneme.

      division        Application example  Real Phoneme  Remarks Word Notation {Eat, eat, eat} [Indian ink-]

[Indian ink-]
[ㅁ ㅓㄱ]
Phonetic
(Speech language)
[Suck it, get it, get it] [Merger, mercer, merger]  [Merger-] [Mug, Mug, Root]  [Mug] [Bruises, bruises, bruises]  [Joke-] [ㅁㅓ ㅇㄴ] Statement Notation {Life, life, life, life only}  {Life-}

[ㅅㅏㄹㅁ]

Phonetic
(Speech language)
[Salmi, Salmini, Salmi]  [salmi-] [Fine, live, live]  [Salme-] [Salme, salme, salmedo]  [Salme] [Three, three thousand]  [three-] [ㅅ ㅏㅁ]

According to Table 12, the phoneme common phoneme type is simpler than the real phoneme. Therefore, each of the features may be used differently as needed. You will be able to use the phoneme common phoneme type according to your needs and ability to process the data by recognizing and analyzing the input voice.

However, the phoneme common phoneme type has a disadvantage in that one or more consonants or vowels are reduced as compared with the real phoneme, thus reducing the accuracy of the search. For example, the vowel [ㅓ] is omitted from the phoneme common phonetic form [ㅁ ㅓㄱ] for [Muger-] between actual phonemes. Therefore, the accuracy of the search should be viewed as low. Therefore, even if it is complicated, it is necessary to use the real stem in order to increase the accuracy.

In the following, we will explain how the real word stem is used in the dictionary to search by all types of words. This will be explained through an example of a heading setting structure of Table 13 and an example of a heading submodel of FIG. 8.

The specific use of real words in Korean dictionaries that search by all utilization forms is mainly made up of the composition of the headword part. For example, words such as {clear} and {value}, the structure of the headword part is shown in Table 13 below. And two headings. Here, since the input word (query) is a utilization type of a word that is arbitrarily determined by the user, a simple utilization type is illustrated instead of the input word. No matter what utilization the query language is, the real word is always constant. In addition, the subheadings and subheadings are conjugation types that will be the basis for establishing real words.

Table 13 below illustrates the structure between the real word and the heading setting of the heading part.

division Example of input word (example of appearance) Real Subheading A representative heading Word {It's sunny, it's sunny, it's sunny} {Sunny-}
(Notation stem) {Sunny-no} {Sunny} {Be clear, be clear, be clear} {Sunny, sunny, sunny} [Sure, say, say] [Not sure] [Laughs] [Magni, horse root, horse] [Mag-] [Mag-ni] [Horse, horse, horse] [Words-] [Horse ^ ko] [Makta, makta, makchi] [membrane-] [Mak ^ ta] Statement {Value is value, if value} {value-}
(Notational noun) {Value-} {Value} {Value, value} {Value only} [Gap, Gap]
[Suddenly] [Gap, Gap]
[Suddenly] {Value-this} [Gapto] [naze-] [^^] [Gamman] [feeling-] [Gaming ^ only]

According to Table 13, the {} mark indicates the notation type, and the [] mark is used to indicate the pronunciation type. The '-' mark is used when the form of stem or spoke is clearly distinguished, and the '^' mark shows only the central part of the stem or stem in pronunciation. In the course of the search, you can perform a work order to find the previous form with this table.

When a query is entered, the actual words are separated, followed by searching for the heading part, and outputting information on the meaning of the searched heading part.

Depending on the type of word used, there may be eight kinds of real words, but fewer may be four types. More important than the burden of capacity, it is important to separate the stem form easily so that the accuracy of the search can be improved.

Next, the heading partial model illustrated in FIG. 8 will be described in more detail. 8 is a heading partial model diagram of a dictionary found with all utilization types according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 8, the heading portion is largely composed of two parts, a representative heading 801 and a subsidiary heading 802, 804, 805, 806, and the like. In addition, it is divided into the structures of the notation type (801, 802, 803) and pronunciation-voice type (804, 805, 806, etc.). Then, the real stem is set with the '-' in the << >> table (808). Clear (809) is the existing basic type used in the solution of the meaning (810), which is conventionally used to solve the meaning of the basic type, so that the basic solution is used.

In the case of a statement, {value} (811) is presented as a representative heading as a notation, and from [Gap] 812, a phonetic form is presented. In the real word between words 813, the basic type {value} of the notation type and the utilization type of the pronunciation type are set. Therefore, even if the user inputs any word utilized as the word {value} into the phonetic language, the user may search for the common phonetic type set in the heading part.

In the case of adverbs, the same applies to search. {Quickly} 814 simply illustrates the heading portion of the adverbs. There are many forms that are repeated, such as [fast] 815, in which case [fast] is set to a common sound type.

The composition of the heading part may be used in various ways to increase the efficiency of the search.

In the following, we will briefly explain how to use 'phoneme common phoneme' among the methods to reduce common phoneme more than real phoneme using consonant and vowel common phoneme. In analyzing and separating the form, if the consonants and vowels are separated more analytically and used as phonemes, the amount of subtypes set in the heading part can be reduced.

This has a concept of the 'phoneme common phoneme type' shown in Table 12, and if a part of the actual phonetic forms shown in Table 13 is grouped into common phonemes, a simpler phoneme common phoneme type can be created and used as shown in Table 14 below.

Table 14 below compares the phoneme structure between phoneme words and phoneme common phoneme.

division Example of input word (example of utilization type) Real Phoneme Subheading Headword Word {It's sunny, it's sunny, it's sunny} {Sunny-} {Sunny-} {Sunny-no} {Sunny} {Now, sunny, sunny} {Sunny, sunny, sunny} [Sure, say, say it]
[Magni, horse root, horse] [Not sure]
[Mag-] [Speaking a-] [Laughs]
[Mag-ni] [Horse, horse, horse] [Words-] [Words-] {Horse ^ ko} [Makta, makta, makchi] [membrane-] [membrane-] [Mak ^ ta] Statement {Value is a value and a value} {value-} {value-} {Value-this} {Value} {Value, value} [Value only] [Suddenly, shoulder
[Gapson Gapson] [Gap, Gap, Gap, Gapson] {Gap} [Suddenly,
Gap, Gapson] [Gapto] [naze-] [naze-] [^^] [Gamman] [feeling-] [feeling-] [Gaming ^ only]

According to Table 14, the usage forms of the word and the verb were separated into a core common form. Therefore, the common form and the subordinate setting form become simpler.

In particular, in the case of a correspondence, the number of surveys is reduced since the survey {-, /,-, /,-, /, etc. is set to the common form {Gap}. If you present it again in the heading, you can see that the information of the real word between 7 terms such as << {value}, [Gap, Gap, Gapson, Gapson, Gap-, Gam-] >> (813) is << {value}, It is abbreviated in four terms as [Gap, Gap-, Gap-] >> (816). In this way, the phoneme common phonetic type reduces the number of common phonetic items in the search. However, the search has a disadvantage that the accuracy may be somewhat lower.

The heading partial configuration of FIG. 8 may be used in the heading configuration of the paper dictionary rather than the electronic dictionary. In other words, it is possible to increase the efficiency of the search by constructing the heading part in the paper dictionary. First, the representative heading is set as the conjugation type used to give accurate information of the supporting sound in the headword search. Then, the usage form that can be used as the basis of the actual verbs can be set as notation and pronunciation using sub-headings, and then the actual verbs are set.

In the electronic dictionary of searching by all utilization types of words using the heading part configuration of FIG. 8, the phonetic dictionary or phoneme common phonemes of the input words are separated, and a search process is performed to find common phonemes set in the heading part as shown in FIG. 8. . Therefore, a device that handles both text and voice languages is required for the processing of input words.

The configuration of such an electronic dictionary will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 9 to 11.

Figure 9 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of an electronic dictionary to look for all utilization types according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a configuration diagram and a working model diagram of an audio-negative analyzer of an electronic dictionary according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 11 is a working model diagram of an output word processing unit of an electronic dictionary according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 9, the input units 901 and 902 for inputting an input word by voice or text through a microphone or a keyboard, and the query word input by voice are received, and the query word input by the letter is received as it is and the query word is arranged. An input word processing unit 903, a data memory unit 904 for storing information on headword parts such as real phonetic words, common phonetic forms, basic words, and parts of speech, and word-related data such as meanings; After receiving the summarized query words and performing the analysis between the real words, the data retrieval unit 905 finds all target information such as the meaning pool, pronunciation, and notation, and then organizes the retrieved information by text or voice. An output word processing unit 906, an operation control unit 907 for controlling the operation of each component to output the retrieved data, and a display for displaying the input data. A ray unit 908, output units 909 and 910 for outputting data information as voice or text, and a transmission / reception unit 911 including a wired / wireless transmission / reception device for transmitting and receiving data information to and from an external device. .

An electronic dictionary having such a configuration may receive data from outside and use it, or may use its own data. Therefore, it is possible to carry out large and small Korean electronic dictionary on various electronic devices. Therefore, the method of applying the word utilization type as a search word may be usefully used in an electronic dictionary.

When the electronic dictionary of FIG. 9 is searched by text only, the voice input 902 and the voice output 910 may be excluded. In the description of FIG. 9, a configuration of a dictionary for input by text and voice is presented for convenience.

 In order to be searched for all the utilization types of words through text or voice, the input word processing unit 903 needs to dictate the phonetic words input by voice as phonetic letters. With the development of speech processing technology, the conversion of voice-to-text and the conversion of text-to-speech can be improved. Dictation of the phonetic language to spelling is technically difficult and error-prone, so avoid using it yet.

In the input word processing unit 903, the query form of the notation type input as the first notation type character may be passed to the data search unit 905 as it is, and the second query term input as the phonetic language is dictated by the pronunciation type character. Next, the data is passed to the data retrieval unit 905.

The data retrieval unit 905 receives a query using a notation type character or a character of a voice language, and analyzes and separates between real words. The working process is shown in Table 15 below.

Table 15 below illustrates the process of morphological analysis between real words.

Hypothetical setting structure between real words Hypothetical example of the query word [mug face] Data search results between real words in the heading part Work process Hypothesis-1: Pulmonary syllable type of question ending syllable [Mug surface] none Set hypothesis type-2 by removing the support of the end syllable from hypothesis type-1 Hypothesis-2: Open syllable type of query end syllable (no support-delete form) [Muggling] none Set hypothetical type-3 by deleting the end syllable from hypothetical type-2 Hypothesis-3: When the syllables at the end of the query are closed syllables
Without [/] none Form of end syllable removed from Hypothesis-3
Hypothesis-4: Deleted form of query syllables [Mug] Found the real stem in the heading {eat} Processing semantic information of heading entries with real words
(End search job) As shown here, if hypothetical stemming is not found in hypothetical type-4, it is a method of finding the form of the actual speech while deleting the end syllables under hypothetical type-5 or less.

According to Table 15 above, there is a hypothetical type between real words. Since we don't know the real words between the query words, we build up the hypothesis form of the real words from the whole form of the query words. Therefore, Hypothesis-1 was set up as the entire form of query. However, since Korean syllables have open syllables (syllables without reception) and closed syllables (syllables with support), Hypothesis-2 is set only when there are closed syllables in the first syllable. In this way, the syllables are set as hypotheses based on syllables.

For the sake of convenience, the hypothetical type is fixed evenly with the closed syllables 1, 3, 5, etc. and the odd syllables with the open syllables 2, 4, 6, etc. The example query is [Mug-Side] with three syllables and closed syllables, so Hypothesis-1 is set to [Mug-Side] with closed syllables. If there is no support for the end syllable of the query, it will start from hypothesis type-2.

[Mug], which is hypothetical type-4, is confirmed as a real word from a result of searching form information between real words of a heading part embedded in the data memory unit 903. Therefore, the real word stem of the query [Mug-face] is identified as [Mug-], and it is possible to receive information on the meaning of the term {eat} which is found by this search type.

In this way, the process of finding the real words by analyzing them while making the notation or pronunciation forms of the query words as hypothetical forms between the real words is called the morphological analysis between real words (hereinafter, referred to as 'real word between words'). If the working process of the real speech liver analyzer is illustrated in the drawings, it is the same as the 'working model between real sounds' of FIG. 10. FIG. 10 shows a working model of the real-mean liver analyzer during the working process of the data retrieval unit 905. Here, hypothetical type-1 (1001) between real words is composed of a structure that deletes the syllable form from a query word. In simple terms, it can be said to analyze real words between words by removing the types of syllables used in words or surveys from words. An example of a query is [spoken] (1003). As a result of setting [spoken face] as the overall form to hypothetical type-1 between real words and finding them in the data memory unit 904 (1005), there was no such real words and returned with no data (1006). 1007) to take action. Then, hypothetical type-2 and hypothetical type-3 are also confirmed and returned in the same manner, and hypothetical type-4 [Malg] is determined as 1001 by finding real data. Depending on the length of the query, the hypothesis form between the actual words may be extended beyond the hypothesis type-5 (1002).

In the case of the query [spoken face] 1003, the hypothetical type-4 [Malg] is confirmed as 'data found' and is confirmed as a real word (1008), thereby forming a morphological analysis between the real words. This work process is in charge of the data retrieval unit 905. If you look only at the process of deciding between verbal sounds (1008), it becomes an analyzer between actual speeches. In order to clearly show that this is a real speech analyzer, a device for displaying a visible real word between words [marg] 1008 can be visually displayed. In other words, if you set up the device so that you can see the found real sound stem, it becomes a dictionary of real sound stem. Even if the actual real words are not displayed visually, the process of the shape analyzer between the real words is actually an important function in charge of the front part of the data retrieval unit 905.

What the data retrieval unit 905 then does is execute 1010 a heading item search that includes the confirmed real word 1008 to provide information about the heading.

The output word processing unit 906 receives the word information of the headword item searched by the real word in the data retrieval unit 905 and processes the output word according to the state at the time of inputting the query word. The state at the time of input of the query is to distinguish the state input by text or voice when the query is input. The status at the time of input is divided into text and voice, and the output word is matched accordingly. What is input in the phonetic language is read again in the phonetic language, and what is input in the text gives information in the text. Or you can give the user two choices.

However, the output word processing unit 906 has to determine the quantitative problem of the information to be provided to the user. In FIG. 11, the heading item full information display form 1101, the representative heading and the appended heading display form 1102, and the basic form and the meaning pool display form 1103 are illustrated as simple forms. This may allow the user to view selectively, and the device may be selectively used for text and voice.

Meanwhile, when analyzing common phoneme types, the method and process of real word stem analysis can be applied as it is. However, when creating a hypothesis, the phoneme, consonants and vowels can be deleted without setting the syllables centered. Then, the number of hypotheses becomes larger than the hypothesis between real words, which becomes the 'phoneme common phoneme analyzer'. will be. Since the structure and the process of the real speech analyzer are the same, a separate description will be omitted. However, the phoneme common phoneme type has a tendency to congregate consonants and vowels in the dark, so it may be better to use consonant and vowels from the first syllable form of the query in contrast to real words. After adding the hypothesis to the end of the syllable's syllables, the hypothesis form is searched. Then, the longest of the hypothetical stems of the found hypothesis is determined as the real speech of the query.

As described above, although the present invention has been described by way of limited embodiments and drawings, the present invention is not limited thereto and is intended by those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains. Of course, various modifications and variations are possible within the scope of equivalents of the claims to be described.

Claims (6)

In the Korean dictionary,
In the composition of the heading part of the dictionary, the method of constructing the use of consonant words as a search term or as the heading itself,
How to construct a conjugation form without using the basic form of the verb in the heading part and the meaning part of the dictionary,
To search by the utilization type of the word characterized in that it comprises a configuration method for searching all utilization forms of word notation or phonetic language type by setting the representative utilization heading and sub-utilization heading and basic and real words in the heading part of the dictionary. Korean dictionary. The method of claim 1,
Korean dictionary to search by utilizing the word,
In the heading part of the dictionary, put the conjugation type, such as quoting or verb, in front of the basic type as the heading, and use it as a search term for the basic type.
Use conjugations such as statements or verbs as headings,
The headings of the notational form are mainly subject, and the pronunciation headings only take the role of searching for the notational heading,
Put the basic form after the consonant conjugation in the heading section, and make the pronunciation form a multiple search term.
Korean dictionary for searching by utilizing the word, characterized in that using the concept of any one selected from the basic language of the notation, the actual phonetic between the conjugation type and the phoneme common phoneme and stem root. The method of claim 1,
Korean dictionary to search by the conjugation of the word is Korean dictionary to search by the conjugation of the word, characterized in that any one of a paper dictionary, electronic dictionary or Internet dictionary. The method of claim 3,
The electronic dictionary is a Korean dictionary for searching by using the type of words, characterized in that by searching the notation and pronunciation type of all words by letter or by searching all the words utilizing type of the voice language. The method of claim 4.
The electronic dictionary includes input units 901 and 902 for inputting an input word as a voice or a text through a microphone or a keyboard, and an input word processing unit for receiving a query word input by voice and receiving a query word input as a character as it is. (903), a data memory unit 904 for storing word heading information such as real phonetic words, common phonetic forms, basic words, parts of speech, and word-related data such as meanings; and a query word arranged by an input word processing unit. A data retrieval unit 905 for retrieving the target words, such as the meaning pool, pronunciation, and notation, and performing output analysis between real words, and outputting the retrieved information by text or voice. 906, an operation control unit 907 for controlling the operation of each component to output the retrieved data, and a display unit for displaying the input data. 908, and output units 909 and 910 for outputting data information as voice or text, and a transmission / reception unit 911 which transmits and receives data information to and from an external device. Korean dictionary to search by word leverage. The method according to claim 5,
The data retrieval unit 905 analyzes the real words to determine the real words of the query, and then finds the target information such as the meaning pool, pronunciation, and notation. And a real word to speech analysis comprising a structure of a data processing process (1004) for searching between real words and a real word between words (1008) structure.

Images