KR20100060507A - Medium that a program for deciding a prior order in applying energy saving design is stored, and prior order deciding system that the program is installed - Google Patents
Medium that a program for deciding a prior order in applying energy saving design is stored, and prior order deciding system that the program is installed Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20100060507A KR20100060507A KR1020080119126A KR20080119126A KR20100060507A KR 20100060507 A KR20100060507 A KR 20100060507A KR 1020080119126 A KR1020080119126 A KR 1020080119126A KR 20080119126 A KR20080119126 A KR 20080119126A KR 20100060507 A KR20100060507 A KR 20100060507A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- building
- importance
- energy saving
- saving design
- program
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
- G05B19/4093—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by part programming, e.g. entry of geometrical information as taken from a technical drawing, combining this with machining and material information to obtain control information, named part programme, for the NC machine
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Electricity, gas or water supply
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Abstract
Description
본 발명은 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 기록매체, 및 이러한 프로그램이 설치된 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위 결정시스템에 관한 것으로, 더욱 상세하게는 합리적이고 효율적으로 건물의 외피구조에서의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 기록매체, 및 이러한 프로그램이 설치된 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위 결정시스템에 관한 것이다. The present invention relates to a recording medium in which a program for determining the priority of energy saving design application is recorded, and a system for prioritizing energy saving design application in which such a program is installed. A recording medium having a program recorded thereon for determining the priority of energy saving design application in a structure, and a system for prioritizing energy saving design application in which such a program is installed.
환경 친화적인 에너지 절약형 건물의 수요가 증가함에 따라서, 각종 건물에의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 필요성이 대두되고 있다.As the demand for environmentally friendly energy-saving buildings increases, the necessity of applying energy-saving designs to various buildings is on the rise.
그러나, 에너지 절약설계가 적용될 수 있는 건물의 벽체구조, 바닥구조, 지붕구조, 창구조, 문구조 등의 여러 외피 구조에서의 에너지 절약설계에 따른 비용 과 효용이 각각 상이한 관계로, 시공자가 특정 건물에 에너지 절약설계를 적용함에 있어서, 건물의 외피구조 중에서 어느 구조에 우선적으로 에너지 절약설계를 적용해야 하는 지에 대한 효율적이고 합리적인 결정방법이 없다는 문제점이 있다. However, since the cost and utility of energy saving design are different in various envelope structures such as wall structure, floor structure, roof structure, window structure, door structure, etc. to which the energy saving design can be applied, the contractor has a specific building. In applying the energy saving design, there is a problem in that there is no efficient and rational method of determining which structure should be preferentially applied to the structure of the shell structure of the building.
따라서, 본 발명의 목적은, 합리적이고 효율적으로 건물의 외피구조에서의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 기록매체, 및 이러한 프로그램이 설치된 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위 결정시스템을 제공함에 있다.Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a recording medium in which a program is recorded for determining the priority of energy saving design application in a building structure of a building reasonably and efficiently, and a system for prioritizing energy saving design application in which such a program is installed. In providing.
상기 목적을 달성하기 위한 본 발명에 따른 기록매체는, 건물에서의 에너지 절약설계가 적용될 수 있는 상기 건물의 부위들의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 기록매체에 있어서, 상기 우선순위를 결정함에 있어서 고려해야 하는, 상기 건물의 상황을 반영하여 결정되는 복수의 결정요소의 요소값을 입력받는 단계; 상기 복수의 결정요소들 각각의 상기 건물의 부위들 각각에서의 에너지 절약설계에 있어서의 중요도를 산출하는 단계; 및 상기 요소값 및 상기 중요도에 기초하여, 상기 건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출하는 단계를 실행하는 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 기록된 것을 특징으로 한다. In the recording medium according to the present invention for achieving the above object, in the recording medium recording a program for determining the priority of the application of the energy saving design of the parts of the building to which the energy saving design in the building can be applied, Receiving element values of a plurality of decision elements determined in consideration of the situation of the building, which should be considered in determining the priority; Calculating importance in an energy saving design in each of the parts of the building of each of the plurality of determinants; And based on the element value and the importance, a program for determining the priority of the energy saving design application for executing the step of calculating the suitability of the energy saving design for each part of the building is recorded.
바람직하게는, 상기 중요도를 산출하는 단계는, 상기 복수의 결정요소들 각각에 있어서의 상기 건물의 부위들의 상대적인 중요도를 결정하는 쌍대 비교를 통해 상기 중요도를 산출하는 것을 특징으로 한다. Preferably, the calculating of the importance may include calculating the importance through a pairwise comparison that determines a relative importance of the parts of the building in each of the plurality of determination elements.
또한, 상기 건물의 각 부위별로 적합도를 산출하는 단계는, 상기 건물의 각 부위별로, 상기 결정요소의 요소값과 상기 결정요소의 상기 건물의 해당 부위에서의 중요도를 곱한 값을 상기 복수의 결정요소에 따라 누적함으로써 산출하는 것을 특징으로 한다. The calculating of the fitness for each part of the building may include, for each part of the building, a value obtained by multiplying an element value of the determination element by the importance of the corresponding element of the building of the determination element. It calculates by accumulating according to the above.
한편, 본 발명에 따른 시스템은, 건물에서의 에너지 절약설계가 적용될 수 있는 상기 건물의 부위들의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 설치된 시스템에 있어서, 상기 우선순위를 결정함에 있어서 고려해야 하는, 상기 건물의 상황을 반영하여 결정되는 복수의 결정요소의 요소값을 입력받는 단계; 상기 복수의 결정요소들 각각의 상기 건물의 부위들 각각에서의 에너지 절약설계에 있어서의 중요도를 산출하는 단계; 및 상기 요소값 및 상기 중요도에 기초하여, 상기 건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출하는 단계를 실행하는 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하기 위한 프로그램이 설치된 것을 특징으로 한다. On the other hand, the system according to the present invention, in a system in which a program for determining the priority of the application of the energy saving design of the parts of the building to which the energy saving design in the building can be applied, is considered in determining the priority. Receiving an element value of a plurality of determination elements determined in response to the situation of the building; Calculating importance in an energy saving design in each of the parts of the building of each of the plurality of determinants; And based on the element value and the importance, characterized in that the program for determining the priority of the application of energy saving design for executing the step of calculating the suitability of the energy saving design for each part of the building.
본 발명에 따르면, 건물의 에너지 사용 절감을 위해 건물의 외피구조의 구성요소들을 변경함에 있어서, 해당 건물의 상황에 따라 합리적 결정이 가능해짐으로써, 신속하고 정확한 대안을 통해 건물의 에너지 성능을 향상시킬 수 있게 된다. According to the present invention, in changing the components of a building's skin structure to reduce the energy use of the building, it is possible to make rational decisions according to the situation of the building, thereby improving the energy performance of the building through a quick and accurate alternative. It becomes possible.
이하에서는 도면을 참조하여 본 발명을 보다 상세하게 설명한다. 도면들 중 동일한 구성요소들은 가능한 한 어느 곳에서든지 동일한 부호들로 나타내고 있음에 유의해야 한다. 또한 본 발명의 요지를 불필요하게 흐릴 수 있는 공지 기능 및 구성에 대한 상세한 설명은 생략한다. Hereinafter, with reference to the drawings will be described the present invention in more detail. It should be noted that the same elements in the figures are represented by the same numerals wherever possible. In addition, detailed descriptions of well-known functions and configurations that may unnecessarily obscure the subject matter of the present invention will be omitted.
본 발명은 건물에서의 에너지 절약설계가 적용될 수 있는 건물의 부위들인 외피구조에서의 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위를 결정하는 방법에 관한 것이다. 본 발명을 실시함에 있어서는 에너지 절약설계가 적용될 수 있는 외피구조는 벽체구조, 바닥구조, 지붕구조, 창구조, 문구조를 예로 들 수 있으며, 이들 외피구조에서의 에너지 절약설계의 적용의 우선순위를 결정함에 있어서 고려해야 하는 요소로서, 건물의 상황을 반영하여 결정되는 복수의 결정요소들의 요소값이 먼저 결정되어야 한다.The present invention relates to a method for determining the priority of the application of the energy saving design in the shell structure, which is the parts of the building to which the energy saving design in the building can be applied. In the practice of the present invention, the shell structure to which the energy saving design can be applied may be a wall structure, a floor structure, a roof structure, a window structure, a door structure, and the priority of the application of the energy saving design in these shell structures is given. As a factor to be considered in the decision, the element values of a plurality of decision factors determined in consideration of the building situation must first be determined.
본 발명을 실시함에 있어서, 건물의 상황을 반영하여 결정되는 복수의 결정요소들은 총 16가지로서, 시공 용이성(X1), 타공정과의 관련성(X2), 재료수급 용이성(X3), 신공법 적용성(X4), 입면 변화 정도(X5), 설계 변형 용이성(X6), APT이미지 영향정도(X7), 에너지 효율성(X8), 환기의 중요도(X9), 향의 중요도(X10), 단열성능의 중요성(X11), 초기투자비 상승정도(X12), 공사비 상승정도(X13), 인건비 상승정도(X14), 재료비 상승정도(X15), 유지관리 용이성(X16)가 된다.In carrying out the present invention, the plurality of determination elements determined in consideration of the situation of the building are 16 in total, and ease of construction (X1), relevance to other processes (X2), ease of supply and demand (X3), and application of new construction methods. (X4), Elevation of Change (X5), Ease of Design Deformation (X6), APT Image Impact (X7), Energy Efficiency (X8), Criticality of Ventilation (X9), Criticality of Scent (X10), Importance of Insulation Performance (X11), initial investment cost increase (X12), construction cost increase (X13), labor cost increase (X14), material cost increase (X15), and ease of maintenance (X16).
이러한 복수의 결정요소의 각 요소값은 각 현장의 여건에 따라 사용자가 직접 선택하여 결정하는 값으로서, 사용자는 하기의 표 1에서의 기준에 따라 각 요소 값을 입력하게 된다.Each element value of the plurality of determination elements is a value that the user directly selects and determines according to the conditions of each site, and the user inputs each element value according to the criteria in Table 1 below.
우선순위 결정요소
Priority Determinants
매우복잡
매우어려움Very low
Very complicated
Very difficult
복잡
어려움lowness
complication
difficulty
보통
usually
단순
쉬움height
simple
facility
매우단순
매우쉬움Very high
Very simple
Very easy
타공정과의 관련성(X2)
재료수급 용이성(X3)
신공법 적용성(X4)Ease of Construction (X1)
Relevance to other processes (X2)
Material Supply Ease (X3)
New Method Applicability (X4)
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
설계 변형 용이성(X6)
APT이미지 영향정도(X7)Elevation change degree (X5)
Ease of Design Deformation (X6)
APT Image Impact (X7)
√√
√
√
√
환기의 중요도(X9)
향의 중요도(X10)
단열성능의 중요성(X11)Energy efficiency (X8)
Importance of ventilation (X9)
Importance of incense (X10)
Importance of insulation performance (X11)
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
공사비 상승정도(X13)
인건비 상승정도(X14)
재료비 상승정도(X15)
유지관리 용이성(X16)Initial investment cost increase (X12)
Construction cost increase degree (X13)
Labor cost increase (X14)
Material cost increase degree (X15)
Ease of Maintenance (X16)
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
즉, 분석 대상 건물 또는 공동주택 단지의 상황을 에너지 절약설계 적용의 우선순위 결정 과정에 반영하기 위해서, 사용자가 결정요소에 대한 요소값을 상기 표 1에서와 같이 직접 입력하면 요소값들이 결정된다. That is, in order to reflect the situation of the analysis target building or the apartment complex in the priority determination process of applying the energy saving design, the element values are determined when the user directly inputs the element values for the decision elements as shown in Table 1 above.
그 다음에는 우선순위 결정요소들 각각의 건물의 외피 구조 각각에서 에너지 절약설계에 있어서의 중요도를 산출한다. It then calculates the importance in the energy-saving design in each of the building envelopes of each building.
도 1은 우선순위 결정요소들의 건물의 외피 구조 각각에서의 중요도의 관계를 나타내고 있는 도면이다. 즉, 우선순위 결정요소 X1, X2, ..., X16은 외피 구조 중 벽체구조와의 관계에 있어서 각각 c1, c2, ..., c16의 중요도를 가지고, 외피 구조 중 바닥구조와의 관계에 있어서 각각 d1, d2, ..., d16의 중요도를 가지며, 외피 구조 중 지붕구조와의 관계에 있어서 각각 e1, e2, ..., e16의 중요도를 가지고, 외피 구조 중 창구조와의 관계에 있어서 각각 f1, f2, ..., f16의 중요도를 가지며, 외피 구조 중 문구조와의 관계에 있어서 각각 g1, g2, ..., g16의 중요도를 가진다.FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship of importance in each of the envelope structures of the building of the priority determinants. That is, the priority determining factors X1, X2, ..., X16 have the importance of c1, c2, ..., c16 respectively in the relationship with the wall structure among the shell structures, and the relationship with the floor structure among the shell structures. In this regard, each has an importance of d1, d2, ..., d16, and has an importance of e1, e2, ..., e16 in relation to the roof structure among the shell structures, and a relationship with the window structure among the shell structures. They each have the importance of f1, f2, ..., f16, and have the importance of g1, g2, ..., g16 in relation to the door structure among the shell structures, respectively.
이들 각각의 중요도를 산출하기 위한 첫 번째 단계는 쌍대비교를 행하는 단계이다. 즉, 주어진 기준에 대하여 요소를 쌍으로 비교하는 것이다. 쌍대비교를 위해서는 매트릭스가 좋은 양식이다. 매트릭스는 가능한 모든 비교를 통하여 여러 가지 정보를 추출하고, 판단의 변화에 따른 전체 우선순위의 일관성을 검토할 수 있는 틀을 제공하는 간단하면서도 잘 정립된 도구이다. 이러한 매트릭스 접근법만이 우선순위의 두 가지 측면인 우세와 열세를 반영할 수 있다. The first step in calculating each of these importance levels is to perform a pairwise comparison. That is, pairs of elements against a given criterion. The matrix is a good form for paired bridges. The matrix is a simple and well-established tool that provides a framework for extracting various information from all possible comparisons and examining the consistency of the overall priority as the judgment changes. Only this matrix approach can reflect two aspects of priority: dominance and inferiority.
먼저, 사용자는 비교의 기준이 되는 속성에 따라 한 요소의 다른 요소에 대한 상대적 중요도를 숫자로서 입력한다. 하기의 표 2는 쌍대비교를 위한 중요도의 수치에 따른 정의를 내리고 있다. First, the user inputs the relative importance of one element to another element as a number according to the attribute of the comparison. Table 2 below is a definition according to the numerical value of importance for the pair contrast bridge.
(equal importance)Similar
(equal importance)
(moderate importance)Slightly important
(moderate importance)
(strong importance)Important
(strong importance)
(very storng importance)very important
(very storng importance)
(extreme importance)Extremely important
(extreme importance)
The median of the above values
(for tied activities)Equal activity
(for tied activities)
상기의 표 2에 기초하여, 사용자는 하기의 표 5-1과 같이 상대적 중요도의 수치를 입력한다. Based on Table 2 above, the user inputs numerical values of relative importance as shown in Table 5-1 below.
상기의 표 3에서의 수치 입력요령을 설명하면, 시공 용이성의 측면에서 벽체구조는 바닥구조에 대해 약간 중요하므로 3을 입력하고, 창구조는 벽체구조에 비해서 중요한 정도이므로 5를 입력한 것이다. 또한, 상대적 중요도의 수치가 1로 입력된 대각선을 중심으로 양쪽이 역수의 관계를 이루고 있음을 확인할 수 있다. Referring to the numerical input method in Table 3, the wall structure is slightly important for the floor structure in terms of ease of construction, the input is 3, and the window structure is 5 because it is more important than the wall structure. In addition, it can be seen that both sides have a reciprocal relationship with respect to a diagonal line with a relative importance value of 1 input.
사용자가 상대적 중요도의 수치를 모두 입력하면, 시공 용이성(X1)의 벽체구조, 바닥구조, 지붕구조, 창구조, 문구조에서의 중요도인 c1, d1, e1, f1, g1이 각각 0.11, 0.06, 0.04, 0.48, 0.31로서 산출되게 된다.When the user inputs all the values of relative importance, the importance of c1, d1, e1, f1, and g1 of wall structure, floor structure, roof structure, window structure and door structure of ease of construction (X1) is 0.11, 0.06, It is calculated as 0.04, 0.48, 0.31.
구체적인 중요도의 산출과정은 하기의 표 4에서와 같다. The calculation process of specific importance is shown in Table 4 below.
즉, 구체적인 산출과정을 살펴보면 먼저 각각의 세로열에서의 각 수치가 차지하는 비율을 모든 세로열에 대해서 산출한 후에 각각의 상기 산출된 비율의 각 가로열에서의 평균값을 구한 것이 중요도가 된다.In other words, looking at the specific calculation process, it is important to first calculate the ratio of each numerical value in each column for all the columns, and then obtain the average value in each row of the calculated ratios.
이와 같은 방법으로 c2 내지 c16, d2 내지 d16, e2 내지 e16, f2 내지 f16, g2 내지 g16을 구한 결과는 다음의 표 5 내지 표 19와 같다. 참고로, 표 내부의 빈칸은 대각선을 중심으로 대칭되는 값과 역수의 관계에 있다. The results of c2 to c16, d2 to d16, e2 to e16, f2 to f16, and g2 to g16 in the same manner are shown in Tables 5 to 19 below. For reference, the blanks in the table are inversely related to the values symmetrical about the diagonal line.
우선순위의 결정에 필요한 복수의 결정요소의 요소값이 입력되고, 복수의 결정요소들 각각의 건물의 각 부위에서의 에너지 절약설계에 있어서의 중요도가 산출되면, 이를 기초로 건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출하게 된다.When the element values of a plurality of determinants required for the determination of priority are input and the importance in the energy saving design in each part of the building of each of the plurality of determinants is calculated, the energy for each part of the building is based on this. The goodness of fit of the saving design is calculated.
건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출함에 있어서는, 건물의 각 부위별로 결정요소의 요소값과 해당 결정요소의 건물의 해당 부위에서의 중요도를 곱한 값을 복수의 결정요소에 따라 누적함으로써 산출하게 된다. In calculating the goodness-of-fit of the energy-saving design for each part of the building, it is calculated by accumulating the value of the factor of the determinant and the importance of the determinant in the corresponding part of the building according to the plurality of determinants for each part of the building. Done.
즉, 다음의 수학식 1 내지 수학식 4에서와 같이 건물의 각 부위별 적합도가 산출될 수 있을 것이다. That is, the fitness of each part of the building may be calculated as in Equations 1 to 4 below.
c6*(X6) + c7*(X7) + c8*(X8) + c9*(X9) + c10*(X10) + c6 * (X6) + c7 * (X7) + c8 * (X8) + c9 * (X9) + c10 * (X10) +
c11*(X11) + c12*(X12) + c13*(X13) + c14*(X14) + c11 * (X11) + c12 * (X12) + c13 * (X13) + c14 * (X14) +
c15*(X15) + c16*(X16) c15 * (X15) + c16 * (X16)
d6*(X6) + d7*(X7) + d8*(X8) + d9*(X9) + d10*(X10) + d6 * (X6) + d7 * (X7) + d8 * (X8) + d9 * (X9) + d10 * (X10) +
d11*(X11) + d12*(X12) + d13*(X13) + d14*(X14) + d11 * (X11) + d12 * (X12) + d13 * (X13) + d14 * (X14) +
d15*(X15) + d16*(X16) d15 * (X15) + d16 * (X16)
e6*(X6) + e7*(X7) + e8*(X8) + e9*(X9) + e10*(X10) + e6 * (X6) + e7 * (X7) + e8 * (X8) + e9 * (X9) + e10 * (X10) +
e11*(X11) + e12*(X12) + e13*(X13) + e14*(X14) + e11 * (X11) + e12 * (X12) + e13 * (X13) + e14 * (X14) +
e15*(X15) + e16*(X16) e15 * (X15) + e16 * (X16)
f6*(X6) + f7*(X7) + f8*(X8) + f9*(X9) + f10*(X10) + f6 * (X6) + f7 * (X7) + f8 * (X8) + f9 * (X9) + f10 * (X10) +
f11*(X11) + f12*(X12) + f13*(X13) + f14*(X14) + f11 * (X11) + f12 * (X12) + f13 * (X13) + f14 * (X14) +
f15*(X15) + f16*(X16) f15 * (X15) + f16 * (X16)
g6*(X6) + g7*(X7) + g8*(X8) + g9*(X9) + g10*(X10) + g6 * (X6) + g7 * (X7) + g8 * (X8) + g9 * (X9) + g10 * (X10) +
g11*(X11) + g12*(X12) + g13*(X13) + g14*(X14) + g11 * (X11) + g12 * (X12) + g13 * (X13) + g14 * (X14) +
g15*(X15) + g16*(X16) g15 * (X15) + g16 * (X16)
한편, 본 발명을 실시함에 있어서는 상기 중요도를 다계층화할 수도 있을 것이다. 즉, 도 1 및 하기의 표 20에서 보는 바와 같이, 결정요소 X1, X2, X3, X4가 포함되는 건축시공 요인(Y1), 결정요소 X5, X6, X7가 포함되는 건축설계 요인(Y2), 결정요소 X8, X9, X10, X11가 포함되는 에너지절약 요인(Y3), 결정요소 X12, X13, X14, X15, X16가 포함되는 경제적 요인(Y4)를 결정요소(X1 내지 X16)에 대한 상위 결정요소(Y1 내지 Y4)로 설정한다. 또한, 상위 결정요소(Y1 내지 Y4)가 포함되는 에너지절약설계 적용부위(Z)를 최상위 결정요소로 설정한다.On the other hand, in the practice of the present invention may be a multi-layered importance. That is, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 20 below, the building construction factor (Y1) including the decision elements X1, X2, X3, X4, the architectural design factor (Y2), including the decision elements X5, X6, X7, Energy decision factor (Y3) including decision factors X8, X9, X10, X11, economic factor (Y4) including decision factors X12, X13, X14, X15, X16 The elements Y1 to Y4 are set. Also, the energy saving design application portion Z including the upper determination elements Y1 to Y4 is set as the highest determination element.
.타공정과의 관련성(X2)
.재료수급 용이성(X3)
.신공법 적용성(X4)Ease of construction (X1)
Relevance to other processes (X2)
.Ease of supply and demand (X3)
New method applicability (X4)
.설계변경용이성(X6)
.APT이미지 영향정도
(X7)Elevation change (X5)
Easy to change design (X6)
.APT image impact
(X7)
.환기의 중요도(X9)
.향의 중요도(X10)
.단열성능의 중요도
(X11)Energy efficiency (X8)
Importance of ventilation (X9)
Importance of incense (X10)
Importance of insulation performance
(X11)
(X12)
.공사비 상승정도(X13)
.인건비 상승정도(X14)
.재료비 상승정도(X15)
.유지관리 용이성(X16)Initial investment cost increase
(X12)
Construction cost increase degree (X13)
Labor cost rise (X14)
Material cost increase (X15)
Ease of maintenance (X16)
도 1에서 보는 바와 같이, 건축시공 요인에 있어서 결정요소 X1, X2, X3, X4는 각각 b1, b2, b3, b4의 중요도를 가지고 있으며, 건축설계 요인에 있어서 결정요소 X5, X6, X7은 각각 b5, b6, b7의 중요도를 가지고 있고, 에너지절약 요인에 있어서 결정요소 X8, X9, X10, X11은 각각 b8, b9, b10, b11의 중요도를 가지고 있으며, 경제적 요인에 있어서 결정요소 X12, X13, X14, X15, X16은 각각 b12, b13, b14, b15, b16의 중요도를 가지고 있다.As shown in FIG. 1, the determinants X1, X2, X3, and X4 each have importance of b1, b2, b3, and b4 in building construction factors, and the determinants X5, X6 and X7 in architectural design factor, respectively. b5, b6, b7, and the determinants X8, X9, X10, and X11 in energy saving factors, respectively, and b8, b9, b10, and b11, respectively. X14, X15 and X16 have the importance of b12, b13, b14, b15 and b16, respectively.
또한, 에너지절약설계 적용부위에 있어서, 건축시공 요인은 a1의 중요도를, 건축설계 요인은 a2의 중요도를, 에너지 절약 요인은 a3의 중요도를, 경제적 요인은 a4의 중요도를 가지고 있다. In addition, in the energy-saving design application area, building construction factor has importance of a1, building design factor has importance of a2, energy saving factor has importance of a3, and economic factor has importance of a4.
이를 기초로, 전술한 쌍대비교를 통한 중요도를 산출해보면, 중요도 ai 는 하기의 표 21, 중요도 bi 는 하기의 표 22 내지 표 25와 같이 산출된다. Based on this, when calculating the importance through the above-mentioned pair contrast bridge, the importance a i is calculated as shown in Table 21, the importance b i below Table 22 to Table 25.
상승정도Initial investment
Ascent
상승정도Construction cost
Ascent
상승정도Labor costs
Ascent
상승정도material cost
Ascent
용이성Maintenance
Ease
이와 같이 중요도를 다계층화한 상태에서 각 계층별 중요도를 고려하여 기초로 건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출할 수도 있을 것이다. In this way, in the state of multi-tiered importance, the fitness of energy-saving design may be calculated for each part of the building based on the importance of each layer.
건물의 각 부위별로 에너지 절약설계의 적합도를 산출함에 있어서는, 건물의 각 부위별로 결정요소의 요소값과 해당 결정요소와 연관되어 있는 모든 중요도를 곱한 값을 복수의 결정요소에 따라 누적함으로써 산출하게 된다. 즉, 다음의 수학식 6 내지 수학식 10에서와 같이 건물의 각 부위별 적합도가 산출될 수 있을 것이다. In calculating the goodness-of-fit of the energy saving design for each part of the building, it is calculated by accumulating the value of the factor of the determinant and all the importance associated with the determinant for each part of the building according to the plurality of determinants. . That is, the fitness of each part of the building may be calculated as shown in Equations 6 to 10 below.
+ a1*b4*c4*(X4) + a2*b5*c5*(X5) + a2*b6*c6*(X6)+ a1 * b4 * c4 * (X4) + a2 * b5 * c5 * (X5) + a2 * b6 * c6 * (X6)
+ a2*b7*c7*(X7) + a3*b8*c8*(X8) + a3*b9*c9*(X9)+ a2 * b7 * c7 * (X7) + a3 * b8 * c8 * (X8) + a3 * b9 * c9 * (X9)
+ a3*b10*c10*(X10) + a3*b11*c11*(X11) + a4*b12*c12*(X12)+ a3 * b10 * c10 * (X10) + a3 * b11 * c11 * (X11) + a4 * b12 * c12 * (X12)
+ a4*b13*c13*(X13) + a4*b14*c14*(X14) + a4*b15*c15*(X15)+ a4 * b13 * c13 * (X13) + a4 * b14 * c14 * (X14) + a4 * b15 * c15 * (X15)
+ a4*b16*c16*(X16)+ a4 * b16 * c16 * (X16)
+ a1*b4*d4*(X4) + a2*b5*d5*(X5) + a2*b6*d6*(X6)+ a1 * b4 * d4 * (X4) + a2 * b5 * d5 * (X5) + a2 * b6 * d6 * (X6)
+ a2*b7*d7*(X7) + a3*b8*d8*(X8) + a3*b9*d9*(X9)+ a2 * b7 * d7 * (X7) + a3 * b8 * d8 * (X8) + a3 * b9 * d9 * (X9)
+ a3*b10*d10*(X10) + a3*b11*d11*(X11) + a4*b12*d12*(X12)+ a3 * b10 * d10 * (X10) + a3 * b11 * d11 * (X11) + a4 * b12 * d12 * (X12)
+ a4*b13*d13*(X13) + a4*b14*d14*(X14) + a4*b15*d15*(X15)+ a4 * b13 * d13 * (X13) + a4 * b14 * d14 * (X14) + a4 * b15 * d15 * (X15)
+ a4*b16*d16*(X16)+ a4 * b16 * d16 * (X16)
+ a1*b4*e4*(X4) + a2*b5*e5*(X5) + a2*b6*e6*(X6)+ a1 * b4 * e4 * (X4) + a2 * b5 * e5 * (X5) + a2 * b6 * e6 * (X6)
+ a2*b7*e7*(X7) + a3*b8*e8*(X8) + a3*b9*e9*(X9)+ a2 * b7 * e7 * (X7) + a3 * b8 * e8 * (X8) + a3 * b9 * e9 * (X9)
+ a3*b10*e10*(X10) + a3*b11*e11*(X11) + a4*b12*e12*(X12)+ a3 * b10 * e10 * (X10) + a3 * b11 * e11 * (X11) + a4 * b12 * e12 * (X12)
+ a4*b13*e13*(X13) + a4*b14*e14*(X14) + a4*b15*e15*(X15)+ a4 * b13 * e13 * (X13) + a4 * b14 * e14 * (X14) + a4 * b15 * e15 * (X15)
+ a4*b16*e16*(X16)+ a4 * b16 * e16 * (X16)
+ a1*b4*f4*(X4) + a2*b5*f5*(X5) + a2*b6*f6*(X6)+ a1 * b4 * f4 * (X4) + a2 * b5 * f5 * (X5) + a2 * b6 * f6 * (X6)
+ a2*b7*f7*(X7) + a3*b8*f8*(X8) + a3*b9*f9*(X9)+ a2 * b7 * f7 * (X7) + a3 * b8 * f8 * (X8) + a3 * b9 * f9 * (X9)
+ a3*b10*f10*(X10) + a3*b11*f11*(X11) + a4*b12*f12*(X12)+ a3 * b10 * f10 * (X10) + a3 * b11 * f11 * (X11) + a4 * b12 * f12 * (X12)
+ a4*b13*f13*(X13) + a4*b14*f14*(X14) + a4*b15*f15*(X15)+ a4 * b13 * f13 * (X13) + a4 * b14 * f14 * (X14) + a4 * b15 * f15 * (X15)
+ a4*b16*f16*(X16) + a4 * b16 * f16 * (X16)
+ a1*b4*g4*(X4) + a2*b5*g5*(X5) + a2*b6*g6*(X6)+ a1 * b4 * g4 * (X4) + a2 * b5 * g5 * (X5) + a2 * b6 * g6 * (X6)
+ a2*b7*g7*(X7) + a3*b8*g8*(X8) + a3*b9*g9*(X9)+ a2 * b7 * g7 * (X7) + a3 * b8 * g8 * (X8) + a3 * b9 * g9 * (X9)
+ a3*b10*g10*(X10) + a3*b11*g11*(X11) + a4*b12*g12*(X12) + a3 * b10 * g10 * (X10) + a3 * b11 * g11 * (X11) + a4 * b12 * g12 * (X12)
+ a4*b13*g13*(X13) + a4*b14*g14*(X14) + a4*b15*g15*(X15)+ a4 * b13 * g13 * (X13) + a4 * b14 * g14 * (X14) + a4 * b15 * g15 * (X15)
+ a4*b16*g16*(X16)+ a4 * b16 * g16 * (X16)
이상에서는 본 발명의 바람직한 실시예 및 응용예에 대하여 도시하고 설명하였지만, 본 발명은 상술한 특정의 실시예 및 응용예에 한정되지 아니하며, 청구범위에서 청구하는 본 발명의 요지를 벗어남이 없이 당해 발명이 속하는 기술분야에서 통상의 지식을 가진자에 의해 다양한 변형실시가 가능한 것은 물론이고, 이러한 변형실시들은 본 발명의 기술적 사상이나 전망으로부터 개별적으로 이해되어져서는 안될 것이다.While the above has been shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments and applications of the present invention, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments and applications described above, the invention without departing from the gist of the invention claimed in the claims Various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art, and these modifications should not be individually understood from the technical spirit or the prospect of the present invention.
도 1은 우선순위 결정요소들의 건물의 외피 구조 각각에서의 중요도의 관계를 나타내고 있는 도면이다. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship of importance in each of the envelope structures of the building of the priority determinants.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080119126A KR101040680B1 (en) | 2008-11-27 | 2008-11-27 | Medium that a Program for deciding a Prior Order in Applying Energy Saving Design is Stored, and Prior Order Deciding System that the Program is installed |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080119126A KR101040680B1 (en) | 2008-11-27 | 2008-11-27 | Medium that a Program for deciding a Prior Order in Applying Energy Saving Design is Stored, and Prior Order Deciding System that the Program is installed |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20100060507A true KR20100060507A (en) | 2010-06-07 |
KR101040680B1 KR101040680B1 (en) | 2011-06-10 |
Family
ID=42361416
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020080119126A KR101040680B1 (en) | 2008-11-27 | 2008-11-27 | Medium that a Program for deciding a Prior Order in Applying Energy Saving Design is Stored, and Prior Order Deciding System that the Program is installed |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR101040680B1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019102287A1 (en) * | 2017-11-21 | 2019-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prioritizing applications for diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
US10635501B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive scaling of workloads in a distributed computing environment |
US10721179B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive resource allocation operations based on historical data in a distributed computing environment |
US10812407B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-10-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic diagonal scaling of workloads in a distributed computing environment |
US10887250B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2021-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reducing resource allocations and application instances in diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
US10893000B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2021-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Diagonal scaling of resource allocations and application instances in a distributed computing environment |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4222923B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2009-02-12 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Energy saving information provision system |
JP2008009466A (en) | 2006-06-27 | 2008-01-17 | Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Energy saving management system and energy saving management program |
JP5134266B2 (en) | 2007-03-07 | 2013-01-30 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Energy saving action support system |
-
2008
- 2008-11-27 KR KR1020080119126A patent/KR101040680B1/en active IP Right Grant
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019102287A1 (en) * | 2017-11-21 | 2019-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prioritizing applications for diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
US10635501B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive scaling of workloads in a distributed computing environment |
US10721179B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive resource allocation operations based on historical data in a distributed computing environment |
US10733015B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Prioritizing applications for diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
GB2581754A (en) * | 2017-11-21 | 2020-08-26 | Ibm | Prioritizing applications for diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
US10812407B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2020-10-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic diagonal scaling of workloads in a distributed computing environment |
US10887250B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2021-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reducing resource allocations and application instances in diagonal scaling in a distributed computing environment |
US10893000B2 (en) | 2017-11-21 | 2021-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Diagonal scaling of resource allocations and application instances in a distributed computing environment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR101040680B1 (en) | 2011-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101040680B1 (en) | Medium that a Program for deciding a Prior Order in Applying Energy Saving Design is Stored, and Prior Order Deciding System that the Program is installed | |
Triana et al. | Characterisation of representative building typologies for social housing projects in Brazil and its energy performance | |
Passer et al. | The impact of future scenarios on building refurbishment strategies towards plus energy buildings | |
Tereci et al. | Energy benchmarking for residential buildings | |
Sehar et al. | A peak-load reduction computing tool sensitive to commercial building environmental preferences | |
Dunant et al. | Regularity and optimisation practice in steel structural frames in real design cases | |
Mirniazmandan et al. | Mutual effect of geometric modifications and diagrid structure on structural optimization of tall buildings | |
Kripka et al. | Use of optimization for automatic grouping of beam cross-section dimensions in reinforced concrete building structures | |
CN102254312A (en) | Method for splicing geographical tile graphs | |
Jayaweera et al. | A parametric approach to optimize solar access for energy efficiency in high-rise residential buildings in dense urban tropics | |
Ochedi et al. | A framework approach to the design of energy efficient residential buildings in Nigeria | |
KR102170428B1 (en) | Method and apparatus of selecting construction scenario for remodeling building envelope | |
CN116595612A (en) | Drawing intelligent examination method and system based on house design specification | |
Silva et al. | Improved seismic design of concentrically X-braced steel frames to Eurocode 8 | |
KR101184982B1 (en) | Evaluation method for optimum sustainable design of building by environmental load and economical efficiency | |
Lu et al. | Damage-based inelastic response spectra for seismic design incorporating performance considerations | |
Wijnants et al. | Methodological issues in evaluating integral sustainable renovations | |
Ozkan et al. | The influence of passive measures on building energy demands for space heating and cooling in multi-unit residential buildings | |
KR20160029461A (en) | Compensation method for lateral displacement of tall building | |
KR101716078B1 (en) | Seismic reinforcement method of building using Buckling Restrained Brace | |
CN109214066B (en) | Building skin optimization method, device, terminal and computer readable storage medium | |
KR20160035807A (en) | Method of certification assessment of building | |
Xing et al. | Developing a system dynamics based building performance simulation model–SdSAP to assist retrofitting decision making | |
JP6980475B2 (en) | Insulation design support system | |
Abuimara et al. | Assessing the impact of changes in occupants on design decision making |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E701 | Decision to grant or registration of patent right | ||
GRNT | Written decision to grant | ||
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20140603 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20150601 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20160603 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20170602 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20180604 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Annual fee payment |
Payment date: 20190603 Year of fee payment: 9 |