KR20090034236A - System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road - Google Patents
System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20090034236A KR20090034236A KR1020070099507A KR20070099507A KR20090034236A KR 20090034236 A KR20090034236 A KR 20090034236A KR 1020070099507 A KR1020070099507 A KR 1020070099507A KR 20070099507 A KR20070099507 A KR 20070099507A KR 20090034236 A KR20090034236 A KR 20090034236A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- risk
- transport
- module
- radioactive waste
- route
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 title description 12
- 239000002901 radioactive waste Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000012857 radioactive material Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001466538 Gymnogyps Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009313 farming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000191 radiation effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005022 packaging material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010816 packaging waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013097 stability assessment Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a safety evaluation system for radioactive waste landmass. Specifically, to assess the risk by establishing a virtual route of the land transport group to calculate the collective dose, to assess the risk, the route is segmented and the collective dose according to the accident status is evaluated for each segmented route, and the evaluated group The present invention relates to a ground transportation safety evaluation system that can derive an optimal safe transport route from a combination of sections based on dose.
The radioactive waste land transportation safety evaluation system according to the present invention comprises a virtual path selection module comprising selecting a plurality of road virtual paths segmented between a radioactive waste generating site and a disposal site; A data input module for receiving and processing respective transport condition data for each of a plurality of sections; A risk assessment module for assessing risk from the input data; A comparison evaluation module for comparing the transportation according to various conditions from the evaluated risk; And a result output module for deriving optimal transport conditions.
Description
The present invention relates to a safety evaluation system for radioactive waste landmass. Specifically, it is to assess the risk by calculating the collective dose by setting the virtual route of the land vehicle, and segmenting the paths to evaluate the risks, and evaluating the group doses according to the accident status by the segmented paths. The present invention relates to a land transportation group safety assessment system that can derive an optimal safe transport route from a combination of intervals based on the collected collective dose.
Because of the risks associated with radioactive waste, ensuring safety is a charging agent for the transport of radioactive waste. To this end, measures must be taken to ensure that all relevant personnel comply with the safety rules and protect residents and the environment from radiation hazards associated with transportation. Several factors should be considered in determining the route of radioactive waste transport, but the evaluation of radiological safety, ie the covering dose of workers and residents, is very important for the safety and environmental aspects of the residents, apart from the large and small radiation doses. In addition, in the case of activities involving radiation coating, such as the transport of radioactive waste, it is necessary to keep the dose as low as reasonably possible.
In accordance with the International Atomic Energy Agency's Safety Assessment Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials, the radiological impact of transportation may be extended to the transport workers, routes and residents living in the vicinity of the transport routes before carrying out the transport operations. Safety assessment should be preceded.
Many computer codes are currently used in countries to assess the risks of transporting radioactive waste. In order to carry out the transport safety assessment, it is necessary to evaluate the collective dose rate received by the general public and workers during normal transport according to the transport route and the change of the evaluation factors, and the potential risk for the radiation-covered object in the case of a virtual accident. There are various evaluation codes to accomplish this. For example, the British CONDOR code, the INTERTRAN code of France, the US Radtran code, and the like correspond to such codes. The CONDOR code calculates the collective dose according to the type of waste or the route of transportation. The INTRANRAN code calculates the cover dose for transporting trains and vehicles on a 1995 basis. The RADTRAN code is characterized by assessing risk using half-life, particle energy and nuclide characteristics. Currently, the Radtran code is the most used worldwide, and the Radtran code is used to calculate the collective dose of radiation workers and locals for radioactive material transport and virtual accident conditions.
Radiation risk and safety assessments provide the basis for routing by evaluating the radiological impacts of various pathways on a variety of factors, and therefore risk and safety assessments should be preceded to ensure the safe transport of radioactive waste. Radioactive waste can be transported through various routes. Since the transport conditions vary according to the transport route and different safety assessment methods must be applied, the most appropriate stability assessment system along the route needs to be selected and the radioactive waste needs to be transported based on the assessed system. Particularly, in case of land transportation of radioactive waste, there is a possibility of directly damaging not only the environment but also the surrounding residents when an accident occurs, so it is necessary to select a path that can minimize the damage in case of an accident. The present invention provides a land transportation safety evaluation system that can obtain the optimal safe transportation conditions by evaluating the safety according to the transport conditions and the path in consideration of the radiological effects on various transport routes that can be selected in the case of land transport of radioactive waste. Suggest.
The present invention calculates the collective dose through normal transport and derives the collective dose through the data statistics of accidents reflecting the risk of accidents to calculate the collective dose for the entire transport route and optimizes the virtual transport situation. It provides a radioactive waste transportation safety evaluation system that can select the route and use the risk of radioactive leakage in case of actual transportation through the selected optimal route or the estimated risk in case of actual accident. For the purpose of
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the radioactive waste land transportation safety evaluation system includes a virtual path selection module including selecting a plurality of road virtual paths segmented between a radioactive waste generation site and a disposal site; A data input module for receiving and processing respective transport condition data for each of a plurality of sections; A risk assessment module for assessing risk from the input data; A comparison evaluation module for comparing the transportation according to various conditions from the evaluated risk; And a result output module for calculating optimal transport conditions.
According to another suitable embodiment of the present invention, the risk assessment module includes a risk assessment module for evaluating risk by dividing it into normal transportation and accident.
According to another suitable embodiment of the present invention, the data is characterized in that the information according to the actual grounding is data is utilized again as input data.
According to the present invention, by using the traffic statistics data to evaluate the risk according to the collective dose during the virtual transport, it can be applied during the actual transport has the advantage that the radioactive waste can be transported through a low risk safe road. In addition, by applying a feedback system that re-datas the accident risks that occur during actual transportation and reflects them in the actual safe transportation evaluation, the risks associated with transportation are best achieved through the safety evaluation system for radioactive waste land transportation system that reflects actual transportation conditions along various routes. It has the advantage of allowing radioactive waste to be transported through a low land route.
The transport risk assessment is to assess the impact of the transport of radioactive material on normal transport or accident conditions and on the general population living in or near the transport route. Radiation effects associated with normal transport are mainly limited to workers, and in the case of accidents with a very low probability of occurrence, the effects are so low that it is common to apply probabilistic methods to assess the risks associated with transport. For land transport groups, the results of the assessment of the hazards caused by the everyday clothing received by the people in the vicinity of the haul are to be included, as well as the hazards caused by the handling of unloading workers.
Radioactive waste Road traffic statistics are used during normal normal transport to assess the risk of overland traffic. And the transportation accident frequency is calculated based on statistical data about accidents during transportation along each route. Accident frequency applies to the probability of accident occurring when transporting radioactive waste. Based on the probability of accidents, the scenarios of virtual accidents are derived to take into account the risk factors, and the transport risks are evaluated by calculating the radiological risks during transport accidents.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1 is a block diagram of a radioactive waste land transportation safety evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, the radioactive waste transport safety evaluation system includes a central management server 10, a
The safety assessment program uses the transport conditions as input data and evaluates the risk according to the transport situation. The risks of the possible transport conditions are compared to determine the best transport conditions.
The virtual
The
The
When calculating the risk in the
In land transport risk assessments, the transport route often passes through dense areas of the population, so the results of the daily risk assessments of the daily coverage of the residents around the transport route are also included. Therefore, the following describes the risk assessment in normal transportation and the risk assessment in the case of a virtual transportation accident.
2 is a diagram illustrating a risk assessment process during normal transportation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to Figure 2, it is assumed that the external dose rate of the packaging material transport (S20). The collective dose is calculated by dividing each section of the set path (S21), and the risk (S22) is calculated. At this time, the collective dose is calculated in consideration of factors such as the transportation mode, the moving speed, the number of stops, the transportation route, the population density around the route, and the vehicle density. Other factors to consider during normal transport include crew members, unloading workers and warehouse workers, pedestrians around radioactive material carriers, individuals in residents and vehicles, workers in areas where frequent transport is carried out, and people living near the shipping or destination of radioactive material. The type of clothing of the individual is considered. Population density classification criteria for regional classification can be divided into urban areas, suburbs, and rural areas. Based on the population density per 1 km 2 , the areas with more than 1,000 people are classified into urban areas and 150 to 1,000 suburban areas with less than 150 rural areas. The data as described above is input to the data input module to calculate the collective dose and risk for each section of the set path.
3 is a diagram illustrating a process of evaluating collective dose and risk in an accident according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 3, the accident category is classified into a diffuse waste (S31) and a non-diffusing waste (S32) at the time of accident (S30), and the amount of coating is calculated. Since the non-diffusing packaging waste (S32) is directly coated to calculate the direct coating amount (S321). Non-diffusing waste (S32) is no longer spread radiation when treating the waste itself. However, in the case of diffuse waste (S31), radiation is diffused through the atmosphere. In the case of diffuse waste (S31), based on the isotope content when calculating the collective dose, the atmospheric diffusivity is evaluated (S312), the accident frequency is calculated (S313), and the reaction state of the package is calculated at the accident (S314). . According to the response of the vesicles can be calculated the collective dose diffused through the atmosphere (S315). The risk is calculated through the direct dose and the collective dose evaluated above (S33).
4 illustrates an algorithm for evaluating the safety of a set virtual path according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 4, a transport route sectioning is performed to set a virtual transport route (S40) and divide the set route into several sections (S41). As described above, the path setting and the segmentation may include several virtual paths between the radioactive waste source and the disposal site, and several virtual paths may be variously segmented. Risk assessment is performed for each segmented route, after which a safe route can be derived from the combination. When the route is segmented, the probability of an accident is calculated by referring to the road statistics (S42). From the calculated likelihood of occurrence of the accident, the risk of radioactive transport depending on whether the accident (S43) through the risk of the accident is determined. According to the risk of accidents, the collective dose is calculated during normal transport without an accident (S44). Collected dose in normal transport is calculated according to the method described with reference to FIG. And collective dose is calculated when the accident is assumed in the section with high probability of accident. In the case of a virtual accident, an accident scenario is derived based on information and transport information of a given section (S45). Through the derived accident scenario, the collective dose is calculated at the assumed accident (S46), and the collective dose calculation at the accident may be performed as in the method described with reference to FIG. 3 above. Such a process may be performed using, for example, Intertran or Radtran codes through the transport condition data in case of an accident as described above. The risk is calculated based on the calculated collective dose after calculating the collective dose in the case of normal transport or accident (S47). The risk of each section is calculated by repeating the process of calculating the collective dose for the other sections. The operation of comparing the risk of each section through the calculated risk (S48). As described above, an optimal safety path may be derived from a combination of a plurality of paths through a risk comparison operation for each path (S49).
The land transportation group safety evaluation system according to the present invention can evaluate safety using various data, and obtain transport conditions with optimal safety conditions. In the case of land-based farming, in particular, the data can be refined to effectively assess the risks and safety of actual land-based farming. Due to the nature of land transportation, there is a radiation effect on local residents. Therefore, the risk assessment involved in normal transportation is used as a data for reducing the risk and safe transportation in normal transportation. In addition, accidents that occur during actual transport are re-datad as a new dangerous condition, which can be effectively applied to actual transport by providing feedback to obtain safety conditions.
The present invention has been described above in detail by using an embodiment. The presented embodiments are exemplary and can be made by those skilled in the art to various modifications and modifications to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention. The scope of the invention is not limited by these modifications and variations, but only by the claims appended below.
1 is a block diagram of a radioactive waste land transportation safety evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a diagram illustrating a risk assessment process during normal transportation according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a diagram illustrating a process of evaluating collective dose and risk in an accident according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
4 illustrates an algorithm for evaluating the safety of a set virtual path according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020070099507A KR20090034236A (en) | 2007-10-02 | 2007-10-02 | System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020070099507A KR20090034236A (en) | 2007-10-02 | 2007-10-02 | System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20090034236A true KR20090034236A (en) | 2009-04-07 |
Family
ID=40760249
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020070099507A KR20090034236A (en) | 2007-10-02 | 2007-10-02 | System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20090034236A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112101759A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-12-18 | 交通运输部科学研究院 | Method and device for constructing risk assessment model and assessing risk of expressway tunnel |
CN116739345A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-09-12 | 南京工业大学 | Real-time evaluation method for possibility of dangerous chemical road transportation accident |
-
2007
- 2007-10-02 KR KR1020070099507A patent/KR20090034236A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112101759A (en) * | 2020-09-03 | 2020-12-18 | 交通运输部科学研究院 | Method and device for constructing risk assessment model and assessing risk of expressway tunnel |
CN116739345A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-09-12 | 南京工业大学 | Real-time evaluation method for possibility of dangerous chemical road transportation accident |
CN116739345B (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2024-03-22 | 南京工业大学 | Real-time evaluation method for possibility of dangerous chemical road transportation accident |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Berman et al. | Designing emergency response networks for hazardous materials transportation | |
Ashley et al. | Considerations in relation to off-site emergency procedures and response for nuclear accidents | |
KR20090028902A (en) | System for evaluating safety of radioactive waste-transportation | |
KR20090034236A (en) | System for evaluating safety of transporting nuclear waste by road | |
KR100935159B1 (en) | System for Evaluating Safety of Transporting Nuclear Waste on the sea | |
KR100967389B1 (en) | Method for selecting a route with the optimum conditions | |
KR101001943B1 (en) | System for selecting a route with the optimum condition | |
KR100967388B1 (en) | Method for selecting a marine route with the optimum conditions | |
KR102661794B1 (en) | Economic evaluation methodology for determination of optimal transportation route for radioactive waste | |
Starita et al. | Protecting and expanding railway networks to hedge against disruptions: a model with travel segments | |
Hobeika et al. | Selection of Preferred Highway Routes for the Shipment of Spent Nuclear Fuel Between Surry and North Anna Power Stations in Virginia | |
Kwak et al. | Radiological safety assessment for transportation of reactor pressure vessel during decommissioning of a nuclear power plant in Korea | |
Chen et al. | The Resource Handbook on DOE Transportation Risk Assessment | |
KR102166759B1 (en) | Safety evaluation system and method for land transportation of radioactive waste | |
CN115496436A (en) | Radioactive substance road transportation path planning system, method and storage medium | |
Amin et al. | Route Optimisation Programming for Emergency Vehicles Aftermath of Freight Train Accidents Involving Hazardous Materials | |
Chen et al. | Resource handbook on transport risk assessment | |
Appleton | Probabilistic safety assessment for the transport of radioactive waste to a UK repository at Sellafield | |
Yoon et al. | Important Parameters for Safety Assessment of the Transport of Radioactive Materials | |
Beyea | Report To The Massachusetts Attorney General On The Potential Consequences Of A Spent-Fuel-Pool Fire At The Pilgrim Or Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant. | |
Chitra et al. | Accident risk assessment of transport of spent fuel by rail in India | |
Ericsson et al. | INTERTRAN-A model for world-wide risk assessment of the transportation of radioactive materials | |
Insani et al. | A Mathematical Model for Integrated Disaster Relief Operations in Early-Stage Flood Scenarios | |
Biglin et al. | Emergency Response to a Nuclear Waste Shipment Accident, Inyo County | |
Assessment | on the Road Infrastructure in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E601 | Decision to refuse application |