KR20090023529A - The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server - Google Patents
The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20090023529A KR20090023529A KR1020070088725A KR20070088725A KR20090023529A KR 20090023529 A KR20090023529 A KR 20090023529A KR 1020070088725 A KR1020070088725 A KR 1020070088725A KR 20070088725 A KR20070088725 A KR 20070088725A KR 20090023529 A KR20090023529 A KR 20090023529A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- recommendation
- review
- reviews
- wedding
- client terminal
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/951—Indexing; Web crawling techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0278—Product appraisal
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a system for securing a customer review through a client terminal and a server.
The system of the present invention includes a site providing server having data stored on an Internet site and having a function of transmitting the data, and a plurality of client terminals capable of connecting to an internet site provided by the site providing server to write a review. Has In addition, the site providing server provides an internet site that displays the wedding related company information so that the user can write reviews of the wedding related company, and allows non-members who access the internet site through the client terminal to join the membership. When you try to do this, you will be asked to answer a marriage-related questionnaire, and the review of the wedding-related company will be allowed to members who have completed the membership. When you try to fill in the questionnaire, you will be asked to re-display the question related to marriage when you register, and you will not be allowed to write a review if the answer to the question during registration does not match the question for writing the review. It is characterized by not.
Description
The present invention comprises a server for transmitting data about an Internet site and a client terminal connected to an Internet site provided by the server, and the user terminal can be used to write a review through the client terminal. It is about a system to secure.
With the advent of the Internet, much of the existing services that were performed offline have been moved online, and many services are still moving online.
What is needed for this online service is an Internet site, and companies are setting up an Internet site and bringing netizens to the site.
The Internet site is operated by a system consisting of client terminals (personal computer (PC) and portable terminal (PDA), etc.) and a server. The server has a data transmission function for the Internet site, and a plurality of client terminals are provided by the server. You can connect to the Internet site.
Most of these Internet sites sell or directly or indirectly sell goods or services.
On the other hand, the present age of the existence of a large number of companies that provide goods or services is a time of flooding of goods and services but also of flooding of advertisements.
The flooding of advertisements caused consumers to avoid advertisements and to distrust the contents of advertisements.
As a result, advertising through mass media is merely increasing the awareness of goods and services, and what has a real influence on the purchase of goods or services becomes the opinion of those around them.
Many experts agree that this will become more apparent in the future.
As a result, companies have been concentrating on marketing by word of mouth, and this phenomenon has been introduced into business methods through the Internet, and many Internet sites are now adopting a method of writing reviews of products.
In other words, the client terminal and server system that can secure user reviews are created and the Internet site is provided through the system.
However, the prior art has a significant problem that it is possible to secure a review, but can not obtain a reliable review, it was only to secure a review for the product.
In other words, even if a netizen who does not even have a transaction about a product writes a testimonial, he could not limit or distinguish the authenticity. It could not be limited or distinguished.
For this reason, netizens are not completely trusted even in the reviews, and the situation has been very confusing due to numerous reviews.
In addition, the service provider was not able to obtain a review.
The present invention is to solve the above problems, more specifically, it is possible to secure reliable reviews for companies that provide services related to marriage (hereinafter referred to as "wedding-related companies") and netizens also reviews The aim is to provide a system for securing a review through client terminals and servers.
The present invention provides a service related to marriage by asking a non-member who wants to become a member and judging whether or not to write a review through an unintended intention by answering this question. Ensure reliable reviews of your business.
Therefore, the system of the present invention has a site providing server in which data relating to an Internet site is stored and having a function of transmitting this data.
It also has a plurality of client terminals that are able to access the Internet site provided by the site providing server and write the user reviews.
In addition, the site providing server provides an Internet site for displaying information of the wedding-related companies so that you can write reviews of the wedding-related companies,
Display a registration form that allows non-members who access the Internet site through the client terminal to join, but asks them to answer questions related to marriage when they try to join.
Review of wedding related companies is allowed to members who have already registered.
When a registered member wants to write a testimonial about a wedding-related company, the question related to marriage is displayed again so that the member can answer again. If they do not match, we do not allow the review.
In addition, the administrator who is logged in to the Internet site can identify which user reviews have been confirmed through the operation of the input terminal of the client terminal. By allowing users to display and identify which reviews are unreviewed reviews, netizens can trust the reviews.
The system of the present invention provides a service related to marriage by asking a non-member who wants to join a membership and determining whether or not to write a testimonial with an unintended intention by answering this question. You can get reliable reviews for companies that provide them.
In addition, if the administrator logged in to the Internet site identifies which reviews have been confirmed through the input operation of the client terminal, the reviews are displayed on the Internet site. The transaction can be classified and displayed as an unconfirmed review, allowing netizens to appreciate the review's reliability.
Hereinafter, the technical spirit of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
However, the accompanying drawings are only examples to illustrate the technical idea of the present invention in more detail, and thus the technical idea of the present invention is not limited to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention relates to a system for securing a review through a client terminal and a server, which enables a company on an internet site provided by a server to write a review through a client terminal connected to the internet site.
Therefore, the present invention also has a site providing server that stores data relating to an Internet site and has a function of transmitting this data.
In addition, it has a plurality of client terminals that can connect to the Internet site provided by the site providing server to write a review on the company displayed on the Internet site.
However, in the present invention, unlike the prior art has the purpose to ensure the reliability of the reviews, and has the purpose of securing a reliable review for the company that provides a service rather than a product.
In the prior art, the biggest reason that the reliability of the reviews was not secured from the point of view of the netizens was because they did not know whether the reviews were written by actual users or by intention of the company's officials.
The inventor of the present application has devised a method that can solve the above problems after a long research and effort.
This method can be divided into two types: the answer to the question of the registration dossier itself. That is to judge the reliability based on whether the answers match.
An example of an internet site that provides information and reviews of wedding companies is that non-members who access the internet site must enter a wedding date in the registration form to register, and the entered wedding date is Saturday, public holiday, or Sunday. If not, the description of the review is not allowed.
In other words, married couples, especially women, rarely remember their wedding dates, and most of them get married on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays except for a few.
Therefore, it is to extract whether the marriage date described in the membership registration document is Saturday, Sunday and public holidays, and if the written marriage date does not belong to any one of Saturday, Sunday and public holidays, the description of the review is blocked.
Since the digital calendar can determine whether a certain date is a public day or a public holiday through the year, month, and day, a technique for equipping a site providing server with a digital calendar to perform this is common in the field of this technology. It can be easily implemented by a knowledgeable person.
Specifically, the system configuration in this case, the site providing server provides an Internet site to display the information of the wedding-related companies so that you can write reviews of the wedding-related companies.
In addition, a non-member who accesses the Internet site through the client terminal is allowed to register, but a member registration document is displayed to input a marriage date when attempting to register.
In addition, the entry of the testimonials for the wedding-related company is allowed to the registered members, but the stored digital calendar confirms whether the wedding date entered for the membership belongs to any one of Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. If you do not belong to the member's reviews will not be allowed.
The problem with this system is that it is not allowed to write a review if you are actually married on a non-Saturday, Sunday, or non-holiday day.
In order to solve this problem, if the entered marriage date is found not to belong to any one of Saturday, Sunday, and public holidays, the member who wants to write a review is asked to enter the marriage time, and then the If not within the scope of the member can be implemented in a form that restricts the review.
In other words, if you get married on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays, most marriages take place between 10 and 16:00, but if you get married on weekdays, you get married between 18:00 and 21:00.
Therefore, if the entered marriage date does not belong on Saturday, Sunday, or holiday and is not entered as married between 18:00 and 21:00, it is regarded as an untrusted member and does not allow the entry of reviews.
Instead of entering the marriage time, the system may be asked to enter what day the marriage date was, or it may be required to enter both the day of the week and the marriage time for the wedding date.
Such a system is a case where the reliability is determined based on the answer to the question itself.
Another way is to ask questions related to marriage at the time of registration, and then when the registered member tries to write a review through this process, answer the same questions as at the time of registration, and the answers of the two questions coincide. It is to decide whether or not to allow the review.
In such a system, when a question is answered false, the answer to the question is not remembered over time, and thus the answer to the question is mostly inconsistent, and thus the effect of preventing repeated descriptions of the review is significant.
Specifically, the system configuration in this case, the site providing server provides an Internet site to display the information of the wedding-related companies so that you can write reviews of the wedding-related companies.
In addition, a non-member who accesses the Internet site through the client terminal is allowed to register, but when the member tries to join, a member registration document is displayed, which requires to answer questions related to marriage.
In addition, the description of the wedding-related companies is allowed to the member who has completed the membership registration,
When a registered member wants to write a testimonial about a wedding-related company, the question related to marriage is displayed again so that the member can answer again. If they do not match, we do not allow the review.
In such a system, even if a member is subscribed to an Internet site, it is preferable not to check the answer to the question entered at the time of membership registration.
In other words, it is desirable for members who have subscribed to the Internet site to be able to view the address and phone number that they entered when registering for membership reasons, etc. The answer is to limit the member's authority to not be identified.
As a question related to marriage in the system, a marriage date is most desirable with a very low probability of misremembering.
FIG. 8 shows an example of a registration document for inputting a wedding date, and FIG. 9 shows an example of a user input screen for inputting a wedding date.
In the method of securing a review using the system, when a client terminal accesses a site providing server, an Internet site providing information of a wedding-related company is displayed on the client terminal, but a member registration menu for selecting membership can be displayed. To provide membership registration menu
In addition, if a non-member connected to the Internet site through the client terminal selects the member registration menu, the member registration document providing step of displaying a membership registration document requiring the user to answer questions related to marriage is performed.
Performing a member registration completion step of allowing a non-member connected through a client terminal to input the contents to the member registration documents displayed through the member registration document providing step to complete membership registration;
If a member of the Internet site selects a menu to write a review on a wedding-related company while logging in as a member through authentication process through a client terminal, a question related to marriage requiring input from a membership registration document is asked. Perform the material statement step to display again and answer again.
If the answer of the question entered through the material statement step and the answer to the question in the registration documents do not match, do not allow the entry of the review, if the match is allowed to review the review Method comprising the steps.
In all the above-described systems, it may be possible to write a review after a certain time elapses after registering.
In other words, in the case of a lie, the contents of the lie cannot be remembered over time, and if the answer is not a truth but a lie, the effect of the system can be maximized.
If the wedding date does not correspond to a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, ask for the wedding date again when you try to write a review, and the wedding date entered when you enter the wedding date and review that you entered when you registered. If is matched may be implemented in a form that allows the description of the user reviews.
Obtaining reviews based on long-term trading experiences with companies that provide services other than goods, such as wedding-related companies, will only reduce the reliability of other reviews.
In other words, even if the reviews based on recent transactions are the main, netizens can question the reliability of the acquired reviews if the reviews based on the long-term trading experience are mixed.
For this reason, it is desirable not to allow descriptions of the reviews based on experiences that have been made too long ago.
For this configuration, when the Internet site provided through the site providing server is to provide a review of the wedding-related companies can be determined based on the wedding date.
In other words, non-members accessing the Internet site to enter the marriage date for membership registration, the site providing server is used when the marriage date entered for membership registration has passed the period set in reverse from the date you want to write a review It is to not allow the description of the latter.
For example, in a system where only members who have been married within two years of writing a review are allowed to write a review, July 2005 if the date to write a review is July 20, 2007 Only members who have been married after 20 days will be allowed to write a review.
On the other hand, even if you have a reliable review through the system described above it does not gain the strong trust of netizens alone.
In order to solve this problem, the administrator of the Internet site checks the transaction facts about the company for each review, and what kind of testimonials have been confirmed and what kind of reviews have not been confirmed? It is possible to provide a system for displaying a visited member or a non-member so that they can recognize it.
In the example of such a system, the site providing server allows a non-member to register on the Internet site through a procedure of inputting personal information through a client terminal.
In addition, the registered member is allowed to access the Internet site and log in through the authentication process (for example, nickname and ID authentication or social security number). Allow reviews.
In addition, the administrator of the Internet site may log in as an administrator of the Internet site through the client terminal, and may use the input terminal of the client terminal to classify the reviews in which the transaction is confirmed for the corresponding company among a plurality of reviews written by the members.
Through this, the user-written reviews are divided into reviewed transactions and reviewed transactions that are displayed on the Internet site.
The input unit of the client terminal refers to a part including a keyboard or mouse of a computer and a command input button of a portable terminal.
The administrator of the Internet site can determine whether the user reviews the reviews by a member who has a transaction with the company through a transaction statement or a receipt presented to the administrator by the member who created the review.
In the administrator's way of distinguishing between reviewed and unverified reviews, an administrator logged into an Internet site clicks on a hypertextualized menu for each review. Can be implemented by procedures.
As a specific example, when an administrator logs in, a hypertextualized menu of 'verified' is displayed on the Internet site as shown in FIG. 1A for each review, and the menu of 'verified' is displayed. The administrator clicks to complete the identification of the transaction as a confirmed review.
As another method, when the administrator logs in, each of the reviews may be displayed on the Internet site, and the administrator may drag the predetermined reviews to the set position so that the classification may be completed by the confirmed reviews.
As described above, when a member or a non-member accesses an Internet site while the classification of the reviews is completed, the form in which the reviews for which the classification is completed is displayed is divided and displayed.
Specifically, as shown in B of FIG. 1, when the user reviews are displayed on the Internet site, the phrase 'verified' may or may not be displayed together. Only the reviewers located show the result of the work being divided into confirmed reviews.)
In other words, the reviews that are treated as confirmed by the administrator's transaction is marked with the phrase 'verified' and no phrase is displayed in the reviews that are not confirmed as transaction (Fig. 1B) The phrase 'unverified' is indicated (not shown).
This type of structure allows the administrator to immediately grasp whether or not the administrator has confirmed the transaction facts about the reviews when the member or non-member accesses the Internet site.
As another display method, there may be a form in which a review in which a transaction is confirmed and a review in which a transaction is not confirmed are classified into separate spaces.
That is, when the classification operation of processing the transaction as the confirmed review for the second review from the bottom in FIG. 1A is completed, as shown in FIG. They are placed in separate spaces so that they can be displayed. (In FIG. 2, the confirmed reviews are displayed in the 'verified review' corner, and the unverified reviews are displayed in the 'review pending review' corner.)
This type is desirable because it allows the administrator to immediately identify whether a transaction has been confirmed for a review when a member or non-member accesses an Internet site, and does not include a review where the transaction has been confirmed and a review without a transaction. Do.
As another display method, a member who accesses an Internet site performs a search box function so that a review of a confirmed transaction and a review of an unknown transaction are selected and displayed.
That is, in the state as shown in FIG. 1A, even if the transaction is identified as a review confirmed for the second review from the bottom, the display state as shown in FIG. 3 is displayed, but only the review confirmed through the search box function When the display is required, as shown in FIG. 4, only the confirmed user reviews are displayed.
Of course, it is also possible to display a review in which the transaction is confirmed first, followed by a review in which the transaction is not confirmed.
For this configuration, a search box may be provided on the Internet site to request a display of selected reviews of confirmed transactions in a state where mixed reviews of confirmed transactions and unconfirmed reviews are displayed.
In addition, the site providing server may display a review of a confirmed transaction or a review of a confirmed transaction when a member or a non-member accessing an Internet site through a client terminal requests a selected display of a review in which the transaction is confirmed through the search box. Should be displayed first, followed by any reviews for which no transaction has been confirmed.
The above-described system of the present invention is a semi-automated system in which an administrator of an Internet site directly checks whether a transaction with a company is performed and performs a division operation.
Alternatively, it can be implemented as a fully automated system.
Such a system has a site providing server in which data relating to an Internet site is stored and having a function of transmitting this data.
In addition, it has a plurality of client terminals that can connect to the Internet site provided by the site providing server to write a review of the company displayed on the Internet site.
In addition, it has a transaction fact storage server that stores the fact that the company has been issued a transaction and receipt.
In addition, the site providing server allows non-members to register on the Internet site through the process of entering personal information through the client terminal, and allows the registered member to log in through the authentication process by accessing the Internet site. Allows the logged-in member to write a review through the client terminal, and checks whether the member who wrote the review has traded the business through the transaction fact storage server to confirm the transaction that the member has written. It is divided into reviews and unreviewed reviews.
The transaction fact storage server may be an IRS server that stores the fact when a customer receives a cash receipt or a card receipt.
It may also be a separate server that is connected to the company that sells the service.
In other words, a company that sells a product or service has a transaction fact storage server that notifies the facts of a transaction of a specific customer, and uses the data stored in the transaction fact storage server to confirm the fact of the transaction for a review.
In the present invention, it is preferable to limit the number of times a particular member can write a review for one company, and most preferably, to limit it to one time.
In other words, there is a need to prevent the official of the company to write a review for the promotion or to repeatedly write the review to criticize the company.
The site providing server of the present invention for such a configuration stores a member's reviews written in relation to each company on a server and makes a database, and when a member wants to write a review, a user reviews the corresponding company from a database. It is implemented to check whether there is a fact and to decide whether or not to write a review.
That is, if there is a description of the review, the description of the review is not allowed. If there is no description of the review, the review of the review is allowed.
Of course, in this case, the number of reviews may be determined. For example, it is a system which does not allow from 3 or more descriptions.
Such a system is desirable to maintain membership even if the user leaves the Internet site.
To this end, membership registration and user reviews are stored in the site providing server, and this data is preserved even if the member leaves the Internet site.
Through this, it is possible to limit the entry of the reviews by the same company by the same member in a way that does not allow the re-subscription of the withdrawn member.
In addition, even if re-enrollment is allowed, it is possible to limit the description after use more than the number of times set for the same company.
Of course, the site providing server allows the description of duplicate reviews of the same company of the same member, and if the same member writes more than the set number of times (preferably two or more times) for the same company is wrong intention Regarding a member who has a member, the user may limit the further description of the review or further implement a deletion process of all the reviews described by the member.
In the present invention, the site providing server is to delete the review if the transaction is not classified as a confirmed review even after the set period, that is, the period set from the date that the review is written, the user reviews described by the member It can be implemented.
Of course, it can be deleted but no longer displayed as a review on an Internet site.
In other words, it can be displayed as classified by netizen's writings, not as a review.
In this way, the reliability of the reviews can be further increased.
In other words, even if a certain period (about 6 months) has elapsed since the date of the review is written, if the transaction is not proved to the administrator or the transaction is not confirmed by the connection with the transaction storage server, the transaction is no longer classified. It is not to be.
In the present invention, the company information (including reviews) is displayed on the Internet site, it may be provided with a search box that can be displayed based on the service satisfaction entered in the reviews or displayed based on the price evaluation .
In other words, members and non-members who visited the Internet site can be displayed in relation to service satisfaction by requesting that a lot of company information is displayed on the Internet site in order from the search box. The implementation is to accommodate this need.
In addition, it is required to display the information in the order of ratings of the companies that are evaluated as very cheap in the reviews, the order of listings that are rated as normal, or the order of listings of the price, and implement the site providing server to accommodate this request. will be.
To this end, the site provision server implements such that the logged-in member allows entry of user reviews only after inputting a service satisfaction item and a price evaluation item for the company.
The service satisfaction item can be implemented in a form that can be selected from among very satisfied, satisfied, moderate, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied.
In addition, the valuation items are very expensive, expensive, moderate, and inexpensive. It is very inexpensive to implement in a form that can be chosen.
In the present invention, it is preferable to implement so that a visitor to the Internet site can send an e-mail or the like with a question content to the member who entered the reviews.
Through this, it is possible not only to increase the reliability of the reviews but also to obtain more detailed information about the reviews.
However, if a member who writes a review does not want to send such a mail, it is necessary to prevent the mail from being sent.
This is because a system that gives inconvenience to the members who write the reviews has difficulty in activating the reviews.
Therefore, on the Internet site, a hypertext menu is displayed to send an e-mail to a member who has entered a review.
In addition, the site providing server provides a menu so that a member who writes a review can decide whether or not to allow a third party to send an e-mail. If you don't allow it, you can't send emails about reviews.
In the present invention, it is sometimes necessary to prevent information on a specific company from being displayed among many companies displayed on an Internet site.
In addition, there is a need to ensure that the display is not displayed, but then again.
It is very important to ensure that the company's information is not displayed and then displayed again so that data such as reviews already obtained is not lost.
To this end, the site provisioning server allows the logged-in administrator to selectively decide whether or not to display information about the company displayed on the Internet site, but the information secured for the company is not deleted even if the information about the company is not displayed. If it is maintained without being displayed again, the already obtained information is displayed as it is.
In the system that is intended to write a review, even a netizen (non-member who visited the Internet site) who does not have a deal with the company may have a free bulletin board so that they can freely leave a post (question, reply, etc.).
In other words, netizens can freely post their stories and questions.
In the above-described system, the reviews written by the members are allowed to be deleted from the site providing server so that even if the members who have written the reviews are not deleted after the set time has elapsed or after a certain procedure It is desirable not to.
Of course, it can also be impossible to modify the reviews.
This is because the first review that is left behind is the most reliable and prevents the action such as deleting a difficultly obtained review.
The predetermined procedure may be that the member who left the reviewer logs out of the Internet site or the administrator performs the sorting process for the reviewer.
In addition, the set time means that a predetermined time (which is a set time) elapses from a time of leaving a user review, such as 12 hours or 24 hours elapsed from a time of leaving a user review.
In the above-described system, it is possible to implement such that reviews left by a particular member are extracted and displayed by a search.
As a specific example, if Member 1 left a review for Company A, Company B, or Company C, the menu displayed in connection with the review written by Company A (e.g., "View other members' reviews") Click to display all the reviews written by companies A, B, and C on the Internet site.
Of course, if the nickname or name of the member is entered in the search box, all the reviews written by the member may be displayed.
To do this, a search menu is displayed on the Internet site to request a search for a review left by a specific member, and the site providing server selects a search menu to search for a review left by a specific member. Extract reviews and display them on an Internet site.
Such a search function may be implemented to be possible only by the administrator of the logged in Internet site, may be made possible only by the logged in member and the administrator, or may be implemented to enable non-members who have visited the Internet site.
This function is useful for the logged-in administrator to determine the reliability of the review and delete the review.
In the implementation of deleting the reviews by the administrator of the Internet site, it is possible to select and delete some of the reviews written by a specific member or to delete all the reviews written by the member at the same time.
In limiting the reviews of the logged in members, the system may be implemented in such a way as to induce the selection of a trading company at the time of membership registration and to allow the entry of the reviews only for the selected companies through this procedure.
In detail, a system for providing such a service will be displayed when a non-member attempts to join a member so that the information of the company displayed on the relevant Internet site is displayed in the membership registration document. After completing the membership registration, members who have registered through this process will be allowed to write a review only for the companies that selected the transaction at the time of registration.
Such a system is desirable when the number of goods or services displayed on an Internet site is small.
In particular, it is preferable when there is little reason to use the company as in the system for securing the reviews of the wedding-related company.
In the system of the present invention, the site providing server may be configured to display and display the information of the wedding-related companies by region, and to perform a separate login process for each region classified when logging in to the Internet site as an administrator. .
That is, as shown in FIG. 6, information of a wedding-related company is classified and displayed by region. (Selecting each region will cause the screen to move and display businesses in that region.)
In this state, if an administrator logs in to each classified region, a separate login process must be performed.
For example, if you want to log in as an administrator in Seoul, you will be logged in only for Seoul, but not for other regions.
In addition, the administrator login to the Daejeon area through the administrator login authentication procedure for the Daejeon area so that only the administrator login to the Daejeon area.
This is very useful when you have a separate manager for each region.
Meanwhile, in the system of the present invention, an email recommendation function for activating recommendation behavior of an Internet site can be added.
In particular, in the case of a system for acquiring testimonials for wedding-related companies, this recommendation activation function is very important.
This is because there is a great interest in the stage of marriage-related reviews for wedding-related companies, but it is indifferent at other times.
In a system having such a recommendation act activating function, it is desirable to make a recommendation act by sending an e-mail, and the recommendation act can be performed only by a member who is subscribed to an Internet site after a member login.
Makes referrals available only to members so that when a member clicks on the "Recommend" menu created on an Internet site, "Recommendation sends a referral email to an unrelated person." You will receive a warning message, which can be a stimulus to members who want to send referral emails in bulk.
In detail, the configuration for this purpose is such that a recommendation menu for sending a recommendation email by a member is displayed on the Internet site provided by the site providing server.
In addition, the site providing server performs a recommendation screen generation step of creating a screen for inputting the email address of the recommendation target when the logged-in member clicks on the recommendation menu displayed on the Internet site.
Allow members to perform the recommendation step to complete the recommendation after entering the email address of the recommendation target on the screen created through the recommendation screen creation step.
When the recommendation step is completed, the mail sending step of sending an email containing the recommendation contents to the email address of the recommendation target entered through the recommendation step is performed.
However, the recommendation function as described above has a problem that a recommendation email is sent in large quantities by an individual seeking only a reward or a mass recommendation email sent by a competitor may be made in an unintended manner.
In other words, knowing only the email address of the recommendation subjects could send a recommendation email to a person who is not really affiliated with the recommender.
As a result, an individual who only seeks a reward may extract a large amount of email through a mail extractor and send a recommendation email.
In some cases, competitors may deliberately send a large number of referrals from third parties, tricking users into making negative recommendations about the companies or Internet sites that send them. It can happen until you get it.
As such, sending a referral email to an audience that is completely unrelated to the referrer is not at all in line with the fundamental purpose of the referral function.
In order to solve this problem, only the members who have subscribed to the relevant Internet site can use the recommendation. If the recommender performs the recommendation, the recommendation person's name, mobile phone number, address, etc. It is necessary to input the unique information of the recommendation subject to identify the subject so that the recommendation can be completed smoothly.
In addition, the content of 'recommended person's mobile phone number and the non-member's mobile phone number to fill out the membership registration document is recognized as a recommender' or as shown in FIG. You can prevent the sending of referral emails to unknown audiences by displaying a phrase that prompts the user to enter the correct cell phone number.
The recommendation activation function is to recommend the Internet site itself and sign up for membership so that at least the recommendation person can recognize the existence of the Internet site by visiting the Internet site and further use it.
To this end, the site providing server of the present invention inputs unique information of a recommendation subject who can identify a recommendation subject together with an e-mail address of a recommendation subject when a member in a logged in state clicks the recommendation menu displayed on an Internet site. A recommendation screen generation step for generating a screen is performed.
In addition, the member inputs the e-mail address of the recommendation target and the unique information of the recommendation target on the screen generated through the recommendation screen generation step, and then performs the recommendation step of completing the recommendation.
In addition, an email containing a recommendation content is sent to the email address of the recommendation subject entered through the recommendation step, and a mail sending step is performed so that unique information of the recommendation subject is stored in association with the recommended member.
In addition, when a non-member accessing an Internet site through a client terminal inputs personal information for membership registration, it checks whether the personal information of the personal information matches the unique information of the stored recommendation target, and if it matches, A recommendation confirmation step of storing the related recommendation as the recommendation of the person who inputs the personal information is performed.
Referring to the step of generating the recommendation screen as a specific example, the recommendation menu as shown in Figure 6 on the Internet site displayed on the client terminal while the member connected to the client terminal logged in by entering the ID and password (the right side of Figure 6) 'Recommend site' displayed at the top is created.
When the recommendation menu of this site is clicked, as shown in FIG. 7, a recommendation screen for inputting an e-mail address and a mobile phone number of the recommendation target is generated on the client terminal screen.
In FIG. 7, the mobile phone number is unique information of the recommendation person because the mobile phone number is not an acquaintance, but is easily known if it is an acquaintance.
In order to find the recommender through the unique information, it is necessary to induce the unique information to be registered in the registration document, since it is easy to derive the correct input in the case of a mobile phone number.
For example, enter the correct mobile phone number in the registration document by writing the phrase 'You must enter the correct mobile phone number to be contacted in order to win the sweepstakes on this site.' It can be induced to.
In the case of a name, a person with the same name may be generated, and in the case of a social security number, such as an acquaintance, it is not easy to know. Considering the presence of a mobile phone number is the most desirable.
Whatever the unique information such as mobile phone number, address, name, etc. for extracting the recommendation, it is desirable for the non-member to enter the unique information in the membership registration document so that membership can be registered.
The recommendation step is a step in which the member (recommended), who is logged in, enters an e-mail address and unique information (cell phone number) of the recommendation target and completes the recommendation on the recommendation screen generated as shown in FIG. 7.
In FIG. 7, the recommender directly inputs the recommendation content sent to the recommendation target, which prevents the recommender who has received the recommendation email from rejecting the mail and does not have negative thoughts even when receiving the duplicate mail and improves the reliability of the recommendation. To do so.
As shown in FIG. 3, it is more preferable that the recommender directly writes the name of the mail sender and the subject of the recommendation email as well as numerous spam mails.
Of course, the name of the recommender may be automatically described and sent by the operation of the site providing server.
As described above, the recommendation step is to complete the recommendation by clicking the 'Send' menu created on the recommendation screen while all the various input items are entered on the recommendation screen.
In the mail sending step, the recommendation email containing the recommendation contents is sent to the email address of the recommendation target entered through the recommendation step.
At this time, the e-mail is sent and at the same time, the site providing server is made to be a database by allowing the unique information of the recommendation target (mobile phone number in FIG. 7) to be stored in association with the recommended member.
That is, the unique information (mobile phone number in FIG. 3) of the recommendation target is stored in connection with data identifying the recommending member.
If the same member recommends more than one person, it is linked to the same member data and a plurality of unique information of recommendation subjects are stored.
In the recommendation confirmation step, if a non-member accesses an Internet site provided by the site providing server of the present invention through a client terminal, and the non-member enters personal information and performs a membership registration procedure, whether the non-member was a recommendation target or not. In the case of confirming and recommending the targets, it is a step of extracting the members who recommended the recommended targets and storing (recording) them as recommenders.
Therefore, in the recommendation confirmation step, the site providing server performs a procedure of confirming whether or not the unique information of the personal information of the recommended recommendation generated by the non-member and the information of the personal information input for the membership match.
In addition, if the personal information input by the non-member and the stored personal information of the recommendation subject match through this confirmation process, the recommender related to the matching unique information is stored as the recommender of the person who inputs the personal information.
Of course, if there is a mismatch, it is assumed that there is no recommender for the person who inputs the personal information, and the storage is not performed. (In this case, the personal information may be directly input by the person who inputs the personal information.)
In the recommendation screen generation step, the screen for inputting the information of the recommendation subject, the recommendation is completed in the recommendation step, the mail sending step, the recommendation confirmation step, and the like are performed by a program provided in the site providing server.
The production of such a program and constituting the system of the present invention through the present invention can be sufficiently implemented by those of ordinary skill in the art, and thus a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
However, through the recommendation function described above, it is not possible to know whether or not the actual effect is generated through the recommendation email. Therefore, when a plurality of referrals for the same recommendation target are generated, who should be selected and rewarded? Many difficulties arise in determining whether or not.
Simply, it is unreasonable to select and reward the person who sent the recommendation email first to a certain recommendation person as a recommendation person, and it is easy to bring complaints because they do not understand the recommendation person.
In addition, it raises doubts and dissatisfaction with the recommendation system, which makes it an obstacle to active recommendation.
However, it would be ineffective to reward referrals to all senders of referral emails.
Distributing a limited amount of compensation to a large number of people by distributing a low amount of compensation is because the effect of stimulating the recommendation is low, and the payment of a high amount of compensation to a small number of people has the effect of stimulating the recommendation.
Therefore, it is very important to establish a compensation system that can be understood by the recommender, and it is not burdensome for the company if it actually generates the effect of the recommendation.
In order to solve this problem, it can be selected as a recommender only if it is determined that the recommendation person reads the received recommendation e-mail.
In addition, in order to stimulate the recommendation behavior, if several recommendation emails are sent to the same recommendation target, and more than one of them is viewed, the recommendation member who sent the first viewed email can be implemented as a practical recommender.
To this end, in the above-described mail sending step, the site providing server sends an e-mail, but when the recommendation e-mail is read, an e-mail programmed to be returned to the site providing server is sent.
In the recommendation confirmation step, the site providing server checks whether the person who entered the personal information has read the recommendation e-mail when the personal information input for the membership coincides with the unique information of the recommendation target stored in the server. If it is confirmed that the recommended email is read after, the recommended member related to the matching unique information is stored as the recommender of the person who inputs the corresponding personal information.
Since a technique for allowing the reading of the sent email to be returned is already well known, a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
In this case, if only one recommender is to be stored (recorded), the recommendation member associated with the first recommended e-mail can be stored (recorded).
That is, in the recommendation confirmation step, if there is more than one recommendation member associated with the matching unique information, the server finds the recommendation member related to the first referred recommendation email and stores it as the recommender of the person who inputs the personal information for membership.
Of course, if only two recommenders are to be stored (recorded), only the recommended members related to the first referred email viewed and the second referred email viewed are stored (recorded).
In sending referral emails to potential customers, it is not advisable to send referral emails to anyone who is already a member of the Internet site.
Therefore, it is desirable to have a means for preventing this.
To this end, if the unique information input in the recommendation step is consistent with the personal information of a member who is already subscribed, the recommendation may not be completed normally.
For example, if you click the 'Send' menu after entering the e-mail address and unique information of the target person on the generated recommendation screen, you will not be recommended as you are already a member of this site. Please input another recommendation person or close the recommendation window 'so that the recommendation for the recommendation person is not completed and the recommendation is not made.
In using the present invention implemented as described above for the promotion and membership of the Internet site, the act of recommendation is actively compensated by rewarding both the recommendation targets who have registered as members and the recommendation members who have recommended the recommendation targets, or by rewarding only the recommended members. Can be done.
Compensation of the recommendation member or the recommendation target member registered as a member may be automatically performed by the server.
In the present invention, the operation of the site providing server or the transaction fact storage server is implemented to be executed by the program, which can be easily implemented by those skilled in the art.
In the description of the present invention, the expression 'validated', 'validated testimonial' or 'patent pending testimonial' is just one example adopted for better understanding.
The present invention is applied to a variety of Internet sites provided through a system having a data transfer function and a plurality of client terminals that can access the server to secure reliable reviews and to recommend the Internet site to potential customers. Can be.
1 is a schematic diagram showing an example in which an administrator logged in to an Internet site is displayed to perform a task of distinguishing a review for which a transaction has been confirmed, and an example in which a review for which a transaction has been confirmed by the segmentation is displayed.
A: Schematic displayed to allow logged-in administrators to distinguish between reviews for which transactions have been confirmed
B: Schematic displayed to members or non-members by completing the task of the logged-in administrator identifying the transaction for which the transaction has been confirmed
2 is for explaining that the reviews are displayed to the member or non-member by the administrator's division of the reviews, the reviews confirmed the transaction and the reviews that are not confirmed transactions are displayed in separate spaces Schematic diagram showing an example of one
3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example in which a review is displayed to a member or a non-member by a manager's division of a review for a review, and an example in which a review in which a transaction is confirmed and a review in which the transaction is not confirmed are displayed separately.
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a state in which only user reviews in which a transaction is confirmed by a search function of a search box is displayed in the display state as shown in FIG.
5 is an operation flowchart illustrating a function of activating an Internet site recommendation behavior according to the present invention.
6 is a schematic diagram for explaining a recommendation menu on an Internet site to which the present invention is applied.
7 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a recommendation screen generated by the recommendation screen generation step of the present invention;
8 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a registration document for non-members to enter for membership
9 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a user input screen for input of a marriage date;
Claims (27)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020070088725A KR20090023529A (en) | 2007-09-02 | 2007-09-02 | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020070088725A KR20090023529A (en) | 2007-09-02 | 2007-09-02 | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20090023529A true KR20090023529A (en) | 2009-03-05 |
Family
ID=40692906
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020070088725A KR20090023529A (en) | 2007-09-02 | 2007-09-02 | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20090023529A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20210144347A (en) | 2020-05-22 | 2021-11-30 | 주식회사 오퍼튜니티 | Apparatus and Method for Providing enterprise information tailored personal situation based on locatoin |
-
2007
- 2007-09-02 KR KR1020070088725A patent/KR20090023529A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20210144347A (en) | 2020-05-22 | 2021-11-30 | 주식회사 오퍼튜니티 | Apparatus and Method for Providing enterprise information tailored personal situation based on locatoin |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Schoenherr et al. | A note on the use of survey research firms to enable empirical data collection | |
| Lim et al. | Is online consumers’ impulsive buying beneficial for e-commerce companies? An empirical investigation of online consumers’ past impulsive buying behaviors | |
| US20190362438A1 (en) | System and method for providing a referral network in a social networking environment | |
| Shammout et al. | The impact of complaints' handling on customers' satisfaction: empirical study on commercial banks' clients in Jordan | |
| Huang et al. | How to enhance vendor-specific perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms and online shopper loyalty | |
| Tee | Factors Influencing Malaysian Youth Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention of Travel Products | |
| KR20090023527A (en) | The system have client terminal equipment and server | |
| Abdullahi | Diffusion of innovation theory and adoption of e-government by medium business enterprises in Kenya: a case of Nairobi city county | |
| Okonkwo | Behavoral Intention to Adopt Internet Banking | |
| KR20090023529A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20090023532A (en) | The system for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104488A (en) | The system for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104490A (en) | The system for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20090023530A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20090023531A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104485A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104486A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20090023528A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20090023533A (en) | The system for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104487A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| KR20070104489A (en) | The system and method for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| Alboqami | Investigating the factors affecting customers’ trust and acceptance of online banking: the case of Saudi Arabia | |
| KR20070104484A (en) | The system for obtain opinions using client terminal equipment and server | |
| Ansari et al. | Do customers perceive reviews as manipulated? A warranting theory perspective | |
| Molapo | An assessment of internet banking service quality |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WITN | Withdrawal due to no request for examination |