KR20080082018A - Method and system for providing sustainability index - Google Patents

Method and system for providing sustainability index Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20080082018A
KR20080082018A KR1020060132468A KR20060132468A KR20080082018A KR 20080082018 A KR20080082018 A KR 20080082018A KR 1020060132468 A KR1020060132468 A KR 1020060132468A KR 20060132468 A KR20060132468 A KR 20060132468A KR 20080082018 A KR20080082018 A KR 20080082018A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
index
sustainability
data
evaluation
unit
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020060132468A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
최혁준
Original Assignee
(주)라임글로브
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by (주)라임글로브 filed Critical (주)라임글로브
Priority to KR1020060132468A priority Critical patent/KR20080082018A/en
Publication of KR20080082018A publication Critical patent/KR20080082018A/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management

Abstract

The present invention is to present an appropriate social contribution model to a company by diagnosing and evaluating social contribution activities among corporate social responsibilities, and more specifically, to objectively evaluate a social contribution index, and to provide the evaluated index to a company. The present invention relates to a system for providing a sustainability index and a method of providing the same for organizing a social contribution strategy. Sustainability index providing system according to the present invention is a data collection unit for collecting data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation; A data classification unit classifying the collected data into a system area and an activity area; A data analysis unit for analyzing the sustainability index using the classified data; And calculating and indexing the analyzed sustainability index, and evaluating the indexed sustainability index to determine a grade for sustainability of each company.

Description

Sustainability Index Provision System and its Provision Method {METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SUSTAINABILITY INDEX}

1 is a block diagram showing the overall configuration of a sustainability index providing system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

2, 3, and 4 block diagrams illustrating an index calculation process according to the embodiment of FIG. 1.

5 is a flowchart illustrating a process of a method of providing a sustainability index according to another embodiment of the present invention.

6, 7 and 8 illustrate, in an example of the present invention, the exponential calculation process of three regions in blocks.

<Explanation of symbols for the main parts of the drawings>

101: data collection department

102: data classification section

103: data analysis department

104: Grading Division

121: system area module

122: activity area module

The present invention is to present an appropriate social contribution model to a company by diagnosing and evaluating social contribution activities among corporate social responsibilities, and more specifically, to objectively evaluate a social contribution index, and to provide the evaluated index to a company. The present invention relates to a system for providing a sustainability index and a method of providing the same for organizing a social contribution strategy.

The ISO 26000 guideline, which will be presented in 2008 through international organizations, includes some mandatory social responsibility. Therefore, companies need to find a countermeasure in accordance with the above global standards and guidelines. In this regard, it is a reality that the recognition scope of the company evaluation is still low and its response range and application area remain limited.

The present invention has been made to solve the problems of the prior art as described above, and proposes a new technology relating to a system for providing a sustainability index and a method of providing the same.

The purpose of the present invention is to objectively evaluate the social contribution index of a company to provide effective infrastructure construction information on the social sustainability of the company.

In addition, the present invention aims to reduce the social expenditure cost of the company and improve the external credibility of the company by effectively and systematically managing the infrastructure configuration of the company's social contribution activities.

In order to achieve the above object and solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, the system for providing a sustainability index for social contribution evaluation of a company according to an embodiment of the present invention, collects data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation Data collection department; A data classification unit classifying the collected data into a system area and an activity area; A data analysis unit for analyzing the sustainability index using the classified data; And calculating and indexing the analyzed sustainability index, and evaluating the indexed sustainability index to determine a grade for sustainability of each company.

According to one aspect of the present invention, in the sustainability index providing system, the rating unit calculates the indexed sustainability index in the form of scores and grades, and evaluates the calculated sustainability index environmental management index and Determine the grade of the Ethical Management Index.

According to another aspect of the present invention, the sustainability index providing system further includes an index evaluation unit for indexing and evaluating data for sustainability evaluation.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for providing a sustainability index for assessing corporate social contribution may include collecting data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation; Classifying the collected data into a system area and an activity area; Analyzing a sustainability index using the classified data; Calculating and indexing the analyzed sustainability index; And evaluating the indexed sustainability index to determine a grade for sustainability by company.

According to one aspect of the invention, the step of determining the rating comprises the steps of calculating the indexed sustainability index in the form of scores and ratings; Evaluating the calculated sustainability index to determine a grade of the environmental management index and the ethical management index.

According to another aspect of the present invention, the step of calculating and indexing the sustainability index may include calculating an index by performing an evaluation process on an evaluation area of the activity section.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 is a block diagram illustrating an overall configuration diagram of a system for providing a sustainability index in an example of the present invention.

As shown in the figure, the system for providing a sustainability index for evaluating corporate social contribution includes a data collecting unit 101 for collecting data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation, and the collected data in the system area module unit and activity area. A data classification unit 102 classified into a module unit, a data analysis unit 103 analyzing the sustainability index using the classified data, and calculating and indexing the analyzed sustainability index, and the indexed sustainability And a grading unit 104 that evaluates the indices to determine the grading for each company's sustainability.

The data collected by the data collection unit 101 is characterized in that the data comprising the sustainability index of each of the social, environmental and ethical fields for the purpose of sustainability evaluation. In addition, the data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation is preferably collected through a method such as a survey, internal interview and internal data analysis.

The data classification unit 102 preferably collects and classifies the collected data for the purpose of the sustainability evaluation into the system area module unit 121 and the active area module unit 122, respectively. In addition, the activity area module unit 122 preferably includes evaluation areas such as corporate culture, corporate reputation, corporate social contribution, and corporate financial contribution.

In order to specify the evaluation area, the system area module unit 121 includes a strategic area item for evaluating consistency and continuity, an operation part item for evaluating an effective organization and an institutional support system, and an evaluation system establishment and organization. It is preferable to include information management section items for evaluating management utilization.

In the system area module unit 121, the items of the strategic section include a consistency evaluation item for evaluating the existence of a slogan, the existence of a core social contribution, and a sustainability evaluation for evaluating the existence of a core social contribution and the preparation of an annual social contribution plan. It is preferable to include the item.

In the system area module unit 121, the operation section items include the presence of a dedicated department, the location of the dedicated department, the name of the team concerned, the number of social contribution employees, the related department, and the existence of a committee for coordinating opinions. It is desirable to include an effective tissue composition evaluation item for evaluating whether or not.

In addition, in the system area module unit 121, the operation section items include an institutional support system for evaluating whether there is a matching grant, employee social contribution-related educational opportunities, volunteer group operation cost support, or recognition of volunteer working hours. It is preferable to include the item.

In the system area module unit 121, the information management section items include whether the evaluation system exists, whether the evaluation budget is secured, whether or not computerization of social contribution activities, whether to manage activity records by employees, whether to manage beneficiary related records, and collaborative NGO related records It is desirable to include the evaluation system construction and organizational management utilization evaluation items that evaluate the management, records management of customers and citizens, and records management of suppliers.

In the system area module unit 121, the information management section item preferably includes an informationalization and report publication evaluation item for evaluating whether a social contribution related report has been published, a social contribution position on a homepage, and the like.

The activity area module unit 122 of the data classification unit 102 preferably includes evaluation items such as an organizational culture sector section, a corporate reputation section section, a corporate social contribution section and a financial contribution section.

In the activity area module unit 122, the company's organizational culture section items include the number of fundraising employees, the total number of employees, the number of volunteer experience employees, the total number of employees, the level of volunteer participation in public service projects, and resources related to social campaigns. It is desirable to include an assessment item of interest, including the degree of participation in service staff. In addition, the corporate culture sector item includes a voluntary evaluation item including a surplus service time ratio, and the corporate culture sector item includes an employee donation amount, total number of employees, total volunteer time, total number of employees, etc. It is preferable to include the aggressiveness evaluation item included.

In addition, in the activity area module unit 122, the corporate culture sector item of the enterprise preferably includes a sustainability evaluation item including a percentage of regular volunteers, and the corporate reputation sector item is a terrestrial social contribution activity. Includes general public interest awareness evaluation items, including broadcasting, social contribution activities, major newspapers, social contribution activities, media exposures, social contribution activities, terrestrial broadcasts, social contribution activities, major newspapers, and total social contributions. It is desirable to include general public interest assessment criteria, including activity press exposure.

In the activity area module unit 122, the corporate reputation category section includes the number of media exposures of core social contributions, the total number of media contributions of social contributions, the annual number of core social contribution related public service themes, and the number of annual public service themes. It is preferable to include a strategic public interest assessment evaluation item, and an enterprise preference evaluation item including an external member's participation in volunteering and an external member's participation in donation.

 In the activity area module unit 122, the social contribution sector items of the company include employee donations, total cash invested in social contribution activities, total in-kind invested in social contribution activities, total volunteer hours, and social campaign + public interest marketing. It is desirable to include quantitative contribution assessment items, including funds raised through the program.

In addition, the company's social contribution category items include employee fundraising, total cash invested in social contribution activities, total cash involvement in social contribution activities, total volunteer hours, funds raised through social campaigns and public interest marketing, and ordinary profits. It is desirable to include qualitative contribution assessment items including the presence of donation support activities, the presence of volunteers, the presence of public utilities, the presence of social campaigns, and the effect of a comprehensive portfolio.

In the activity area module unit 122, the social contribution sector items of the enterprise include active nature protection efforts evaluation items including biodiversity conservation efforts, environmental investment-to-sales ratios, and eco-friendly raw materials purchases. It is desirable to. In addition, the social contribution section of the company includes the contribution tax reduction evaluation evaluation items including the social contribution amount stated as accounting costs, and the public interest associated marketing sales, including the total sales and total sales of the products subject to public interest marketing It is preferable to include the evaluation item of a contribution effect.

In accordance with the present invention, the sustainability index providing system calculates and indexes a data analysis unit 103 for analyzing a sustainability index using the classified data and the analyzed sustainability index, and indexes the indexed sustainability. And a grading unit 104 that evaluates the indices to determine the grading for each company's sustainability.

2, 3, and 4 are block diagrams illustrating an index calculation process in the preferred embodiment of FIG. 1. 5 is a block diagram illustrating the flow of the method for providing a sustainability index in an example of the present invention.

The data collection unit 201 receives data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation through the step S501. The data collection unit 201 performs step S501 and transfers the input data to the index evaluation unit 204. In step S502, the evaluation area of the classified system unit is divided into an operation unit, a strategy unit, an information management unit, and the like for evaluation.

The index evaluation unit 204 performs step S502 to index the input data and evaluates the indexed input data. In addition, the index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluated data to the data analysis unit 205 for index analysis. The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluation result by the data collection unit 201 to the system area module unit 202 and the activity area module unit 203 separately by item and area. In the collected data classified through step S501, step S502 evaluates items such as donation support activities, volunteer activities, public works, public service campaigns, public relations marketing, and the like. In this case, the collected data is classified into evaluation areas of a system unit and an activity unit to perform the evaluation.

In step S502, the evaluation area of the classified system section is divided into an operation section, a strategy section, an information management section, and the like. Step S502 evaluates the consistency and continuity for the operation sector, and the likelihood and expertise for the strategy sector.

The evaluation result of each area is input to the data analysis unit 205 in an individual and overall form. The data analysis unit 205 performs step S503 to calculate the evaluation result for each area by a method based on a score or a grade, and performs an indexing process on the calculated evaluation result. In another aspect, the indexing process may include calculating an index by performing an index calculation method for the evaluation area of the activity section, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.

Next, the rating unit 206 determines the score and the grade of each company's sustainability for the indexed evaluation results through step S504.

As shown in FIG. 5, the data collection unit 101 for collecting data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation performs step S501, for a preferred implementation.

In step S501, the sustainability index of the company is classified into three areas such as social contribution, environmental management, and ethical management by using the collected data. In another aspect, the data collection unit 101 assigns a predetermined recognizable value to the collected data through step S501, and indexes the collected information to enable individual and collective evaluation. It may include.

In step S502, the collected data classified through step S501 is indexed and evaluated. To this end, step S502 performs an exponential calculation process for the three regions. Step S502 indexes the data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation of the three areas classified and evaluated in step S501, and classifies the indexed data into an evaluation area of a system part and an evaluation area of an activity part. Analyze by In this step (S501), the exponential calculation process of the three areas will be described in detail in the rear portion with reference to the accompanying drawings.

In step S503, each of the indexed evaluation areas is divided into organizational culture sectors, corporate reputation sectors, social contribution sectors, financial contribution sectors, and the like, and the indexes of the evaluation results are indexed. From the other side. As illustrated in FIG. 5, the indexing process may include calculating an index by performing an index calculation method on an evaluation area of an activity section.

In step S504, through the index for the indexed evaluation results, the evaluation details of the evaluation area of the system sector and the evaluation area of the activity sector are calculated as scores and grades, and the sustainability scores and grades are determined.

6, 7 and 8 illustrate, in an example of the present invention, the exponential calculation process of three regions in blocks.

As mentioned above, sustainability assessment is carried out in three categories: (1) social contribution, (2) environmental management, and (3) ethical management.

Hereinafter, an index calculation process for sustainability of a company in the social contribution sector according to one side of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 6.

The data collection unit 201 receives data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation through the step S501. The data collection unit 201 performs the step S501 and transfers the input data to the index evaluation unit 204. The index evaluation unit 204 performs step S502 to index the input data and evaluates the indexed input data. The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluated data to the data analysis unit 205 for index analysis. The index evaluation unit 204 classifies and transmits the evaluation result by the data collection unit 201 to the system area module unit 202 and the activity area module unit 203 for each item and area.

With respect to the collected data classified through step S501, step S502 evaluates items such as donation activities, volunteer work, public service projects, public service campaigns, public relations marketing, and the like. In this case, the collected data is classified into evaluation areas of a system unit and an activity unit to perform the evaluation.

In step S502, the evaluation area of the classified system section is divided into an operation section, a strategy section, an information management section, and the like. Step S502 evaluates the consistency and continuity for the operation sector, and the likelihood and expertise for the strategy sector. In addition, step S502 evaluates the evaluation system and communication for the information management section.

Next, in step S502, the evaluation areas of the classified activity sectors may be classified into organizational culture sectors, corporate reputation sectors, social contribution sectors, and financial contribution sectors. In step S502, the degree of interest, spontaneity, aggressiveness and persistence in the organizational culture sector is evaluated, and the recognition and likelihood of the corporate reputation sector is evaluated. In addition, step (S502) evaluates the quantitative and qualitative contributions, impact, and contact for the social contribution sector, and evaluates the sales contribution and tax reduction effect on the financial contribution sector.

The evaluation result of each area is input to the data analysis unit 205 in an individual and overall form. The data analysis unit 205 performs step S504 to calculate the evaluation results for each area by a method based on a score or a grade, and performs an indexing process on the calculated evaluation results. From the other side. As illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, the indexing process may include calculating an index by performing an index calculation method on an evaluation area of an activity section.

The grade determination unit 206 derives the index of social contribution activity by indexing the comprehensive evaluation contents of the evaluation area of the system unit and the evaluation area of the activity unit into scores and grades by performing step S504.

Hereinafter, the index calculation process for the sustainability of the company for the environmental management sector, according to another aspect of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.

The data collection unit 201 receives data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation through the step S501. The data collection unit 201 performs the step S501 and transfers the input data to the index evaluation unit 204. The index evaluation unit 204 performs step S502 to index the input data and evaluates the indexed input data.

The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluated data to the data analysis unit 205 for index analysis. The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluation result by the data collection unit 201 to the system area module unit 202 and the activity area module unit 203 separately by item and area.

Regarding the collected data classified through step S501, step S502 evaluates items such as INPUT management, OUTPUT management, environmental management performance, and the like. The INPUT management includes raw and subsidiary materials, energy, water, etc., and the OUTPUT management includes air, water, waste, products, soil, transport, etc., and the environmental management performances such as EMS, financial adequacy and community relations. It is preferable to include.

At this time, the collected data is classified into evaluation areas of a system unit and an activity unit to perform the evaluation. In step S502, the evaluation area of the classified system section is divided into an operation section, a strategy section, an information management section, and the like.

Step S502 evaluates the consistency and continuity for the operation sector, and evaluates the effective organization and proactive prevention for the strategy sector. In addition, step S202 evaluates the evaluation monitoring system and information disclosure for the information management section.

Next, in the evaluation area of the classified activity section, step S502 evaluates the evaluation area of the classified activity section by subdividing it into organizational culture section, corporate reputation section, social contribution section, and financial contribution section. . In step S502, the degree of interest and voluntaryness in the organizational culture sector is evaluated, and the risk management, legal compliance and awareness of the corporate reputation sector are evaluated. In addition, the step (S502) is to evaluate the resource consumption, recyclability and active nature protection for the social contribution sector, and to evaluate the cost reduction and sales increase for the financial contribution sector.

The evaluation result of each area is input to the data analysis unit 205 in an individual and overall form. The data analysis unit 205 performs step S504 to calculate the evaluation results for each area by a method based on a score or a grade, and performs an indexing process on the calculated evaluation results. In another aspect, the indexing process may include calculating an index by performing an index calculation method for the evaluation area of the activity section, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.

The grade determination unit 206 derives the index of social contribution activity by indexing the comprehensive evaluation contents of the evaluation area of the system unit and the evaluation area of the activity unit into scores and grades by performing step S504.

Hereinafter, the index calculation process for the sustainability of the company for the ethical management sector according to another aspect of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.

The data collection unit 201 receives data for the purpose of sustainability evaluation through the step S501. The data collection unit 201 performs step S501 and transfers the input data to the index evaluation unit 204. The index evaluation unit 204 performs step S502 to index the input data and evaluates the indexed input data.

The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluated data to the data analysis unit 205 for index analysis. The index evaluation unit 204 transmits the evaluation result by the data collection unit 201 to the system area module unit 202 and the activity area module unit 203 separately by item and area. Regarding the collected data classified through step S501, step S502 evaluates items of shareholders, employees, customers, partners, and the like.

The shareholders may include accounting transparency, fair trade, anti-corruption, etc., and employees should include evaluation items such as human rights protection, health and safety, education and training, industrial relations, and human resource management. In this case, the collected data is classified into evaluation areas of a system unit and an activity unit to perform the evaluation.

In step S502, the evaluation area of the classified system section is divided into an operation section, a strategy section, an information management section, and the like. Step S502 evaluates the expertise and systemicity of the operation sector, and evaluates the direction and specificity of the strategy sector. In addition, step S502 evaluates the evaluation system and communication for the information management section.

Next, in the evaluation area of the classified activity section, step (S502) divides the evaluation area of the classified activity section into an organizational culture section, a corporate reputation section, a social contribution section, and a financial contribution section to evaluate the evaluation. Done.

Step (S502) evaluates the sympathy, participation, satisfaction, etc. for the organizational culture sector, and evaluates the recognition, understanding, preference, etc. for the corporate reputation sector. In addition, step S502 evaluates the equity, fairness and transparency of the social contribution sector.

The evaluation result of each area is input to the data analysis unit 205 in an individual and overall form. The data analysis unit 205 performs step S503 to calculate the evaluation result for each area by a method based on a score or a grade, and performs an indexing process on the calculated evaluation result. As illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, the indexing process may include calculating an index by performing an index calculation method on an evaluation area of an activity section.

The grade determination unit 206 derives the index of social contribution activity by indexing the comprehensive evaluation contents of the evaluation area of the system unit and the evaluation area of the activity unit into scores and grades by performing step S504.

The method for providing a sustainability index according to the present invention may be implemented in the form of program instructions that can be executed by various computer means and recorded in a computer readable medium. The computer readable medium may include program instructions, data files, data structures, etc. alone or in combination. Program instructions recorded on the media may be those specially designed and constructed for the purposes of the present invention, or they may be of the kind well-known and available to those having skill in the computer software arts. Examples of computer-readable recording media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape, optical media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, and magnetic disks, such as floppy disks. Magneto-optical media, and hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions, such as ROM, RAM, flash memory, and the like. Examples of program instructions include not only machine code generated by a compiler, but also high-level language code that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter or the like. The hardware device described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operations of the present invention, and vice versa.

As described above, although the present invention has been described with reference to limited embodiments and drawings, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains various modifications and variations from such descriptions. This is possible.

Therefore, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the described embodiments, but should be determined not only by the claims below but also by the equivalents of the claims.

According to the present invention, the social contribution index of a company can be objectively evaluated to provide effective infrastructure construction information on the social sustainability of the company.

In addition, according to the present invention, it is possible to effectively and systematically manage the infrastructure configuration of the company's social contribution activities to reduce the company's social expenditure costs and improve the company's external credibility.

Claims (12)

In the system of providing sustainability index for evaluating corporate social contribution, A data collection department that collects data for the purpose of sustainability assessment; A data classification unit classifying the collected data; A data analysis unit for analyzing the sustainability index using the classified data; And The grading division that calculates and indexes the analyzed sustainability index and evaluates the indexed sustainability index to determine the grade of sustainability by company. Sustainability index providing system comprising a. The method of claim 1, The data classification section, The sustained index providing system classifies the collected data by area and transmits the collected data to a system area module unit and an activity area module unit. The method of claim 1, Sustainability index providing system further comprises an index evaluation unit for evaluating the sustainability by indexing the collected data. The method of claim 3, The collected data is a sustainability index providing system, characterized in that collected by the area of society, environment and ethics. The method of claim 1, The data classification section, Sustainability index provision system which is classified into the organizational culture section, corporate reputation section, corporate social contribution section and corporate financial contribution section and delivered to the activity area module. The method of claim 1, The rating section is, Calculating the indexed sustainability index in the form of scores and grades, Sustainability index providing system, characterized in that for evaluating the calculated sustainability index to determine the grade of environmental management index and ethical management index. In providing sustainability index for evaluating corporate social contribution, Collecting data for the purpose of sustainability assessment; Indexing and evaluating the collected data; Classifying and analyzing the indexed and evaluated data into an evaluation area of a system part and an evaluation area of an activity part; Calculating and indexing the classified and analyzed data as scores or grades; And Analyzing the indexed data to determine the sustainability score and grade for each company Sustainability index providing method comprising a. The method of claim 7, wherein The indexing step, And an evaluation area of the system unit and an evaluation area of the activity unit, respectively. The method of claim 8, The determining the sustainability score and grade for each company, Evaluating the calculated sustainability index to determine the grade of environmental management index and ethical management index Sustainability index providing method comprising a. The method of claim 7, wherein The document for the purpose of the sustainability evaluation mentioned above, Method of providing a sustainability index, characterized in that the data collected through the step of survey, internal interview and internal data analysis. The method of claim 9, The determining the sustainability score and grade for each company, remind And calculating the sustainability index by performing an index index calculation method for the evaluation area of the active sector. A computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the method of any one of claims 7 to 11 is recorded.
KR1020060132468A 2006-12-22 2006-12-22 Method and system for providing sustainability index KR20080082018A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020060132468A KR20080082018A (en) 2006-12-22 2006-12-22 Method and system for providing sustainability index

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020060132468A KR20080082018A (en) 2006-12-22 2006-12-22 Method and system for providing sustainability index

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20080082018A true KR20080082018A (en) 2008-09-11

Family

ID=40021461

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020060132468A KR20080082018A (en) 2006-12-22 2006-12-22 Method and system for providing sustainability index

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20080082018A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20210052166A (en) 2020-05-13 2021-05-10 김국주 Systems and methods of evaluating Hospital Social Responsibility
US20220138659A1 (en) * 2011-02-10 2022-05-05 Diego Guicciardi System and Method for Enhancing and Sustaining Operational Efficiency
JP7178751B1 (en) * 2022-05-10 2022-11-28 株式会社Robot Consulting Information processing system, information processing method and program

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20220138659A1 (en) * 2011-02-10 2022-05-05 Diego Guicciardi System and Method for Enhancing and Sustaining Operational Efficiency
KR20210052166A (en) 2020-05-13 2021-05-10 김국주 Systems and methods of evaluating Hospital Social Responsibility
JP7178751B1 (en) * 2022-05-10 2022-11-28 株式会社Robot Consulting Information processing system, information processing method and program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Longoni et al. Sustainable innovativeness and the triple bottom line: The role of organizational time perspective
Anand et al. Measuring retail supply chain performance: Theoretical model using key performance indicators (KPIs)
Liu et al. Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies
Costa et al. A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception
Howorth et al. The focus of working capital management in UK small firms
Abidi et al. Humanitarian supply chain performance management: a systematic literature review
Lourenço et al. How does the market value corporate sustainability performance?
Brennan et al. Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implications
Jung et al. Good neighbors but bad employers: Two faces of corporate social responsibility programs
Will Talking about the future within an SME? Corporate foresight and the potential contributions to sustainable development
Schaltegger et al. Management roles and sustainability information. Exploring corporate practice
Shahrokhi Shahraki et al. Designing computable general equilibrium models for transportation applications
Pocewicz et al. Preferences of Wyoming residents for siting of energy and residential development
Budianto et al. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Islamic and Conventional Banking: VOSviewer Bibliometric and Library Research
Mendoza et al. Outsourcing sustainability: A game-theoretic modeling approach
Salling Assessment of transport projects: risk analysis and decision support
KR20080082018A (en) Method and system for providing sustainability index
Jewell et al. Measuring construction professional services exports: a case for change
Zafar et al. Dynamic stakeholder salience mapping framework for highway route alignment decisions: China–Pakistan Economic Corridor as a case study
Dagilienė et al. Corporate social reporting development in Lithuania
Jadhav et al. Sustainability practices disclosure of top logistics firms in Australia
Gholami et al. CRM: A conceptual framework of enablers and perspectives
Mjomba et al. Effects of enterprise resource planning on organisational performance on Kenya Power and Lighting Company: a case study of Kenya Power and Lighting Company Voi branch
Hervani et al. Blockchain technology and socially sustainable supply chains—A valuation perspective
Raluca Guse et al. Exploring eco-costs and externalities absorption policies and procedures in the context of global warming.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E601 Decision to refuse application