KR20080004241A - A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production - Google Patents

A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20080004241A
KR20080004241A KR1020060063010A KR20060063010A KR20080004241A KR 20080004241 A KR20080004241 A KR 20080004241A KR 1020060063010 A KR1020060063010 A KR 1020060063010A KR 20060063010 A KR20060063010 A KR 20060063010A KR 20080004241 A KR20080004241 A KR 20080004241A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
quality
inspection
evaluation
result
welder
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020060063010A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
신상호
이지원
Original Assignee
Stx조선주식회사
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stx조선주식회사 filed Critical Stx조선주식회사
Priority to KR1020060063010A priority Critical patent/KR20080004241A/en
Publication of KR20080004241A publication Critical patent/KR20080004241A/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04Manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

A method of establishing a system for a quality test result analysis of ship building is provided to deal with the following steps of setting up a process for establishing the level of the quality management strategy and goal, establishing a system for the standard structure and the outcome evaluation of quality management, setting up a process and a structure for self-inspection, breeding up engineers for managing grade and quality of the whole work process, systemizing documents for quality through information management, managing the documents, bringing up cooperative companies, establishing an evaluation system, and dealing with demands of a ship owner. A method of establishing a system for a quality test result analysis of ship building follows an acquisition/evaluation/report procedure of quality result. The procedure includes the following steps: a quality result assessment step in each item which assesses a quality result of each test part about inferiority over test performance; a line QC test reliability evaluation step which evaluates the submitted check and evaluation sheet which compares a line QC test result with an official test result and then analyzes the comparison; a test progress rate assessment step which assesses a progress rate for the progress status in comparison with a test plan; a company quality status assessment step which manages the quality status of materials, a block outside the company and a cooperator inside the company by acquiring and grading the quality status; a quality cost assessment step which assesses additionally demanded waste cost according to rework, additional resource input, comment and feedback; a bad welder assessment and notice step which monthly selects a bad welder, notifies him to the relevant team and deducts cost charged by work process; an evaluation and report step which evaluates and reports the acquired quality result; and an incentive or penalty step which grants an award or gives one a penalty according to the quality result evaluation.

Description

선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법{A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production}A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production}

도 1은 본 발명에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법에 관한 절차의 흐름도이다.1 is a flowchart of a procedure relating to a method for establishing a system for analyzing quality inspection results on shipbuilding according to the present invention.

도 2는 조선소의 일반적인 업무 흐름도이다.2 is a general business flowchart of the shipyard.

본 발명은 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법에 관한 것이다.The present invention relates to a method for establishing a quality inspection result analysis system in shipbuilding.

일반적으로, 조선소에서는 선박을 건조하기 위하여, 도 2에 도시된 바와 같이, 수주된 선박의 종류 및 크기 등에 따라 영업 설계를 시작함과 아울러 생산 계획에서 대일정 계획을 수립하게 된다. 그리고, 영업 설계가 수립되면 상세 설계를 함과 아울러 이에 따른 구매 일정을 수립한 후 이러한 구매 일정과 연동하도록 중일정 계획을 수립한다.In general, in order to build a ship, the shipyard will start a business design according to the type and size of the ordered ship as shown in FIG. 2 and establish a large schedule plan in the production plan. When the sales design is established, the detailed design and the purchase schedule are established accordingly, and then the middle schedule plan is established to link with the purchase schedule.

상기한 상세 설계 및 중일정 계획을 수립하면, 다시 생산에 필요한 생산 설계를 함과 아울러 생산에 필요한 소일정 계획을 부서별, 공종별로 수립하고 이에 따라 구매 자재를 입고하고, 생산을 실행하게 된다. 물론, 이 경우에는 생산 일정 및 생산 계획을 개별적으로 수립하여 선박 건조 일정에 소요되는 인력 배치, 도크(DOCK) 배치, 작업장 배치, 건조 설비 일정 조절, 외주 업체 일정 조절 등을 연동하여 행하게 된다.When the detailed design and the mid-schedule plan are established, the production design necessary for production is made again, and the small schedule necessary for the production is established by department and by industry, and the purchase material is received and production is executed accordingly. Of course, in this case, the production schedule and production plan are separately established, and work is performed in conjunction with manpower arrangement, dock arrangement, workshop arrangement, drying facility schedule adjustment, and subcontractor schedule adjustment.

이러한 생산 일정계획은 대략 1년 정도의 중일정 계획을 세우고, 이에 기초하여 다시 부서별, 공종별 시수에 따른 상세한 소일정 계획을 수립함으로써 이루어지게 된다. 즉, 중일정 계획을 수립할 때 조립, 도장, 의장, 탑재 등의 부서별 및 선행, 후행, 선실, 특도, 기장, 선장, 전장 등과 같은 공종별로 각자가 시수에 따른 일정을 수립하게 되는 것이다.This production schedule is planned by establishing a mid-term schedule of about one year, and then, based on this, a detailed small schedule according to the time of each department and work. In other words, when establishing a mid-scheduling plan, each department, such as assembly, painting, designing, and mounting, and each division such as leading, trailing, cabin, specialty, captain, captain, and battlefield, will establish a schedule according to the time.

한편, 종래에는 선박건조상의 품질관리 업무의 차질로 인하여, 자재 검수가 미흡하여 불량 자재가 생산에 투입되고, 단위 공정별 자주검사가 미흡하여 불량률이 높아지며, 품질관련 문서가 체계적으로 관리되지 않아 후속 생산에 적용되지 않는 한편, 작업 담당자 변경 및 신규 작업자에 대한 업무이관이 체계적으로 이루어지지 않아 작업자 기술 저하 및 품질저하 문제가 발생하였다. 또한, 협력업체의 잦은 인원 변동으로 인하여 기술 축적이 안 되고, 물량 증가에 따른 협력업체 고기량자 미확보로 인하여 품질의 불안전성을 초래하며, 선주 요구사항에 대한 관리가 체계적으로 이루어지지 않는 문제도 발생하였다.On the other hand, in the past, due to the disruption of the quality control work in shipbuilding, the material inspection is insufficient and the defective material is put into production. On the other hand, it was not applied to production, and the change of the work person and the transfer of work to new workers were not carried out systematically, resulting in the deterioration of worker technology and quality deterioration. In addition, technology is not accumulated due to frequent fluctuations in the number of business partners, and quality instability is caused due to the inability to secure supplier's meat quantity due to the increase in quantity. It was.

본 발명은 상기와 같은 문제점을 해결하기 위해 제안된 것으로, 선박건조상의 품질관리 업무에 있어서, 품질관리 전략 및 목표 수준 설정 프로세스를 정립하 고, 품질관리 기준 체계 및 성과 평가 시스템을 구축하며, 자주검사 체계 및 프로세스를 정립하고, 전 공정 정도 및 품질관리를 위한 기술인력을 양성하는 한편, 지식관리를 통한 품질 관련 문서를 체계화하여 관리하고, 협력업체 육성 및 평가체계를 구축하며, 선주의 요구 사항을 통합적으로 처리할 수 있도록 하는 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 한다.The present invention has been proposed to solve the above problems, in establishing the quality control strategy and target level setting process in the quality control work on shipbuilding, establish a quality control standard system and performance evaluation system, and often Establish inspection system and process, train technical manpower for overall process quality and quality control, systematize and manage quality-related documents through knowledge management, foster business partners and establish evaluation system, owner requirements The aim is to provide a method for establishing a quality inspection result analysis system for shipbuilding that enables the integrated processing of ships.

본 발명의 기타 목적 및 장점들은 하기에 설명될 것이며, 이는 본 발명의 청구범위에 기재된 사항 및 그 실시예의 개시 내용뿐만 아니라, 이들로부터 용이하게 추고할 수 있는 범위 내의 수단 및 조합에 의해 보다 넓은 범위로 포섭될 것임을 첨언한다.Other objects and advantages of the present invention will be described below, which are not limited to the matters set forth in the claims and the disclosure of the embodiments thereof, but also to the broader ranges by means and combinations within the range readily recited therefrom. Add that it will be included.

상기한 목적을 달성하기 위하여 본 발명은, 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법을 제시한다.In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for establishing a quality inspection result analysis system on shipbuilding according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures.

이하, 본 발명의 바람직한 실시예를 첨부된 도면들을 참조하여 상세히 설명한다. 한편, 본 발명을 설명함에 있어, 관련된 공지 구성 또는 기능에 대한 구체적인 설명이 본 발명의 요지를 흐릴 수 있다고 판단되는 경우에는 그 상세한 설명은 생략한다. 또한, 이하에서 본 발명의 바람직한 실시예를 설명할 것이나, 본 발명의 기술적 사상은 이에 한정하거나 제한되지 않고 당업자에 의해 변형되어 다양하게 실시될 수 있음은 물론이다.Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Meanwhile, in describing the present invention, when it is determined that a detailed description of a related known configuration or function may obscure the gist of the present invention, the detailed description thereof will be omitted. In addition, the following will describe a preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the technical idea of the present invention is not limited thereto and may be variously modified and modified by those skilled in the art.

이하에서는, 도 1을 참조하여 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법에 대하여 설명한다.Hereinafter, with reference to Figure 1 will be described a method for establishing a quality inspection result analysis system on the ship drying according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures.

품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법은, 선박건조상의 품질관리 업무에 있어서, 검사 수행 대비 불량에 대한 검사 Part별 품질 결과를 산정하는 단계(항목별 품질 결과 산정단계); 공식검사 결과와 Line QC 검사 결과를 비교 분석하고 제출된 Check 및 평가 Sheet를 평가하는 단계(Line QC 검사 신뢰도 평가단계); 검사 계획 대비 진행 현황에 대한 진도율을 산정하는 단계(검사 진도율 산정단계); 기자재 및 사외블록, 사내 협력업체의 품질 현황을 취합하고 등급화 하여 관리하는 단계(업체 품질현황 산정단계); 재작업, 추가자원 투입 및 코멘트, 피드백 등에 따라 추가로 소요되는 낭비 비용을 산정하는 단계(품질비용 산정단계); 월별 불량 용접사를 선정하여 관련팀에 통보하고 기성 공제하는 단계(불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계); 취합된 품질 결과에 대하여 평가하고 보고하는 단계(평가 및 보고단계); 및 품질 결과 평가에 따른 상 또는 벌을 시행하는 단계(인센티브 또는 패널티 부여단계)를 포함하여 이루어진다.Quality results collected / evaluation / reporting procedures establishing quality test results analysis system on the ship method according to, in the quality control work on the ship, inspecting step of estimating the Part-specific quality of results (itemized quality of the performed tests against bad Result calculation step); Comparing and analyzing official test result and line QC test result and evaluating submitted check and evaluation sheet ( Line QC inspection reliability evaluation step; Estimating the progress rate against the progress of the inspection plan ( inspection progress rate estimating step); Collecting, grading and managing the quality status of equipment, external blocks, and in-house partner companies ( calculation of quality status); Estimating additional waste costs according to rework, input of additional resources and comments, feedback ( quality cost estimation step); Selecting a monthly bad welder and notifying related teams and making a deduction ( bad welder selection and notification step); Evaluating and reporting on the collected quality results ( evaluating and reporting step); And performing an award or punishment according to the evaluation of the quality result ( incentive or penalty granting step) .

이때, 상기 항목별 품질 결과 산정단계에서는, 품질 불량 실태 및 원인 분석을 통하여 불량 재발을 방지하고 품질 검사 항목 설정 또는 주요관리 항목 설정 등에 활용하게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 각 Part별(선체/의장/도장/비파괴/기자재) 검사결과, 코멘트 사항, Claim 분석 결과 자료들을 취합하고 분석한다.At this time, in the step of calculating the quality result for each item , it is used to prevent the recurrence and to set the quality inspection item or the main management item by analyzing the quality defect and the cause of the quality. (Non-destructive / Material) Collect and analyze the test results, comments and claims analysis results.

상기 Line QC 검사 신뢰도 평가단계에서는, Line QC의 Check & 평가 Sheet 신뢰도 평가를 통해 검사 절차서(Inspection & Test Plan, ITP) 작성시 공식검사 항목 축소를 유도하게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 제출된 Check & 평가 Sheet 결과서와 공식검사 결과서를 비교 분석 평가한다. 이러한 Line QC 검사 신뢰도 평가단계는 보다 구체적으로, 작성된 Check & 평가 Sheet 결과서를 평가하는 단계; 신뢰도를 등록하는 단계; 및 공식검사 유무를 결정하는 단계로 이루어진다. Line In the QC inspection reliability evaluation step , line QC's check & evaluation sheet reliability evaluation leads to reduction of official inspection items when preparing an inspection & test plan (ITP). Comparative analysis and evaluation of official test results. Such Line QC inspection reliability evaluation step is more specifically, the step of evaluating the written Check & Evaluation Sheet; Registering a reliability; And determining whether there is a formal inspection.

상기 검사 진도율 산정단계에서는, 필수검사 항목 및 검사 진척률, 미 검사율 등의 관리를 통해 해당 호선의 진행 사항을 분석하고 주요 Issue 사항을 해결하게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 표준 검사일정 대비 실제 검사의 진도율 산정, 검사 Load 분석, 주요 공정 필수 완료 검사의 진행 상태 산정 등을 수행한다. 이러한 검사 진도율 산정단계는 보다 구체적으로, 기간 및 호선을 지정하는 단계; 검사 진도율을 산정하는 단계; 및 결과를 분석하는 단계로 이루어진다.In the step of estimating the test progress rate, the progress of the ship is analyzed and the major issues are resolved through the management of essential test items, test progress rate, untested rate, etc. Performs test load analysis, estimates the progress of critical process completion tests, etc. Such a test progress rate estimating step may more specifically include: specifying a period and a ship; Calculating a test progress rate; And analyzing the results.

상기 업체 품질현황 산정단계에서는, 등급 결정을 통해 기자재 업체의 입고 및 출장 검사 여부를 결정하고 품질 평가를 통해 협력업체를 관리하게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 공식 검사결과 및 코멘트 처리능력, Check & 평가 Sheet의 품질보증(Quality Assurance, QA) 평가 등을 산정해 평가하고, 그 평가결과에 관한 정보는 조달팀, 외주관리팀 등과 공유한다. 이러한 업체 품질현황 산정단계는 보다 구체적으로, 기자재 및 사외 검사결과를 취합하는 단계; Check & 평가 Sheet의 품질보증(Quality Assurance, QA) 평가를 분석하는 단계; 및 업체 품질을 평가하는 단계로 이루어진다.In the company's quality status calculation stage , the company decides whether to check the receipt and travel of the equipment company through grade determination and manages the supplier through quality evaluation.In this stage, the official inspection results, comment processing capability, check & evaluation sheet Quality Assurance (QA) evaluation is calculated and evaluated, and information on the evaluation results is shared with the procurement team and outsourcing management team. The company's quality status calculation step is more specifically, collecting equipment and external inspection results; Analyzing the Quality Assurance (QA) evaluation of the Check & Evaluation Sheet; And evaluating the company quality.

상기 품질비용 산정단계에서는, 품질비용 산정을 통해 공정 중 발생하는 Loss를 최소화하며 작업효율을 향상시키게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 표준 작업 외 발생하는 모든 추가 작업의 기록을 통해 품질비용을 산출한다.In the quality cost calculation step , the quality cost is calculated to minimize the loss occurring during the process and improve the work efficiency. In this step, the quality cost is calculated by recording all the additional work that occurs outside the standard work.

상기 불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계에서는, 월별 비파괴 검사 결과를 토대로 불량 용접사를 선정한 후 교육을 통한 기량향상을 수행하게 되는데, 본 단계에서는 품질검사 결과를 취합해 불량 용접사를 월별로 산정한 후 불량 용접사에 대해서는 보수교육을 통한 재시험을 실시해 자격여부의 유지를 판단하며, 불량 용접사에 따른 재작업의 결과에 대해서는 기성 공제 처리를 한다. 이러한 불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계는 보다 구체적으로, 용접사별 불량율을 집계하는 단계; 불량 용접사를 선정하는 단계; 불량 용접사에게 통보하는 단계; 및 기성 공제 처리하는 단계로 이루어진다.In the selection and notification of the bad welder, the bad welder is selected based on the monthly non-destructive test results, and the skill improvement through training is carried out. Re-tests through maintenance training are conducted to determine eligibility, and a deduction is made for the result of rework by a poor welder. The selection and notification step of the defective welder is more specifically, the step of counting the defective rate for each welder; Selecting a bad welder; Notifying the bad welder; And a ready deduction process.

상기 평가 및 보고단계는, 분석된 자료를 기초로 전사적인 품질 수준을 향상시키는 것을 그 목적으로 하는 바, 품질 검사 결과, 진척률, 업체 품질, 품질 비용에 대해 주요관리지표(KPI)를 기준으로 주간/월간/분기/년 품질 보고를 수행한다.The evaluation and reporting step aims to improve the company-wide quality level based on the analyzed data. Based on the key management index (KPI) on the quality inspection results, progress rate, company quality, and quality cost. Perform weekly / monthly / quarterly / year quality reports.

상기 인센티브 또는 패널티 부여단계에서는, 분석된 자료를 기초로 하여 전부서의 품질 수준을 객관적으로 평가하며, 매월 또는 분기별 품질 평가 결과에 따라서 인센티브 또는 패널티를 부과한다.In the incentive or penalty granting step , the quality level of all the books is objectively evaluated based on the analyzed data, and incentives or penalties are imposed according to the monthly or quarterly quality evaluation results.

이상의 설명은 본 발명의 기술 사상을 예시적으로 설명한 것에 불과한 것으로서, 본 발명이 속하는 기술 분야에서 통상의 지식을 가진 자라면 본 발명의 본질적인 특성에서 벗어나지 않는 범위 내에서 다양한 수정, 변경 및 치환이 가능할 것 이다. 따라서, 본 발명에 개시된 실시예 및 첨부된 도면들은 본 발명의 기술 사상을 한정하기 위한 것이 아니라 설명하기 위한 것이고, 이러한 실시예 및 첨부된 도면에 의하여 본 발명의 기술 사상의 범위가 한정되는 것은 아니다. 본 발명의 보호 범위는 아래의 청구범위에 의하여 해석되어야 하며, 그와 동등한 범위 내에 있는 모든 기술 사상은 본 발명의 권리범위에 포함되는 것으로 해석되어야 할 것이다.The above description is merely illustrative of the technical idea of the present invention, and various modifications, changes, and substitutions may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the essential characteristics of the present invention. will be. Accordingly, the embodiments disclosed in the present invention and the accompanying drawings are not intended to limit the technical spirit of the present invention but to describe the present invention, and the scope of the technical idea of the present invention is not limited by the embodiments and the accompanying drawings. . The protection scope of the present invention should be interpreted by the following claims, and all technical ideas within the equivalent scope should be interpreted as being included in the scope of the present invention.

상술한 바와 같이, 본 발명에 따르면, 선박건조상의 품질관리 업무에 있어서, 품질관리 전략 및 목표 수준 설정 프로세스를 정립하고, 품질관리 기준 체계 및 성과 평가 시스템을 구축하며, 자주검사 체계 및 프로세스를 정립하고, 전 공정 정도 및 품질관리를 위한 기술인력을 양성하는 한편, 지식관리를 통한 품질 관련 문서를 체계화하여 관리하고, 협력업체 육성 및 평가체계를 구축하며, 선주의 요구 사항을 통합적으로 처리할 수 있다.As described above, according to the present invention, in the quality control work on shipbuilding, establish a quality control strategy and target level setting process, establish a quality control standard system and performance evaluation system, and establish an independent inspection system and process It is possible to cultivate technical manpower for overall process quality and quality control, to systematically manage and manage quality-related documents through knowledge management, to foster business partners and establish evaluation system, and to handle owner's requirements in an integrated manner. have.

본 발명의 다른 효과는, 이상에서 설명한 실시예 및 본 발명의 청구범위에 기재된 사항뿐만 아니라, 이들로부터 용이하게 추고할 수 있는 범위 내에서 발생할 수 있는 효과 및 산업 발전에 기여하는 잠정적 장점의 가능성들에 의해 보다 넓은 범위로 포섭될 것임을 첨언한다.Other effects of the present invention, as well as those described in the above-described embodiments and claims of the present invention, as well as potential effects that may occur within the range that can be easily estimated therefrom and potential advantages that contribute to industrial development It will be added that it will be covered by a wider scope.

Claims (9)

선박건조상의 품질관리 업무에 있어서, In the quality control work in shipbuilding, 검사 수행 대비 불량에 대한 검사 Part별 품질 결과를 산정하는 단계(항목별 품질 결과 산정단계); Calculating a quality result for each inspection part for the failure compared to the inspection performance (evaluating the quality results for each item); 공식검사 결과와 Line QC 검사 결과를 비교 분석하고 제출된 Check 및 평가 Sheet를 평가하는 단계(Line QC 검사 신뢰도 평가단계); Comparing and analyzing official test result and line QC test result and evaluating submitted check and evaluation sheet ( Line QC inspection reliability evaluation step; 검사 계획 대비 진행 현황에 대한 진도율을 산정하는 단계(검사 진도율 산정단계); Estimating the progress rate against the progress of the inspection plan ( inspection progress rate estimating step); 기자재 및 사외블록, 사내 협력업체의 품질 현황을 취합하고 등급화 하여 관리하는 단계(업체 품질현황 산정단계); Collecting, grading and managing the quality status of equipment, external blocks, and in-house partner companies ( calculation of quality status); 재작업, 추가자원 투입 및 코멘트, 피드백 등에 따라 추가로 소요되는 낭비 비용을 산정하는 단계(품질비용 산정단계); Estimating additional waste costs according to rework, input of additional resources and comments, feedback ( quality cost estimation step); 월별 불량 용접사를 선정하여 관련팀에 통보하고 기성 공제하는 단계(불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계); Selecting a monthly bad welder and notifying related teams and making a deduction ( bad welder selection and notification step); 취합된 품질 결과에 대하여 평가하고 보고하는 단계(평가 및 보고단계); Evaluating and reporting on the collected quality results ( evaluating and reporting step); And 품질 결과 평가에 따른 상 또는 벌을 시행하는 단계(인센티브 또는 패널티 부여단계) Implementing awards or punishments in accordance with the evaluation of quality results (incentive or penalty Grant stage) 를 포함하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.Containing Method of establishing a quality inspection result analysis system in shipbuilding according to quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedure. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 항목별 품질 결과 산정단계에서는, In the step of calculating the quality result for each item , 품질 불량 실태 및 원인 분석을 통하여 불량 재발을 방지하고 품질 검사 항목 설정 또는 주요관리 항목 설정 등에 활용함에 있어서, 각 Part별(선체/의장/도장/비파괴/기자재) 검사결과, 코멘트 사항, Claim 분석 결과 자료들을 모두 취합하고 분석하는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.In order to prevent recurrence of defects through quality defects and cause analysis, and to use them for setting quality inspection items or setting up major management items, inspection results, comments, and claims analysis results for each part A method of establishing a quality inspection result analysis system on shipbuilding according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedure, characterized in that all data are collected and analyzed. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 Line QC 검사 신뢰도 평가단계는, Line QC inspection reliability evaluation stage , 작성된 Check & 평가 Sheet 결과서를 평가하는 단계; Evaluating the completed Check & Evaluation Sheet; 신뢰도를 등록하는 단계; 및 Registering a reliability; And 공식검사 유무를 결정하는 단계Steps to determine whether there is a formal inspection 를 포함하여 이루어지는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.Quality inspection result analysis system construction method according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures, characterized in that made in the. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 검사 진도율 산정단계에서는, In the inspection progress rate calculation step , 필수검사 항목 및 검사 진척률, 미 검사율 등의 관리를 통해 해당 호선의 진 행 사항을 분석하고 주요 Issue 사항을 해결함에 있어서, 표준 검사일정 대비 실제 검사의 진도율 산정, 검사 Load 분석, 주요 공정 필수 완료 검사의 진행 상태 산정 등을 수행하는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.In analyzing the progress of the ship and resolving major issues through the management of essential inspection items, inspection progress rate, and non-inspection rate, calculation of progress rate of actual inspection, inspection load analysis, and essential process completion compared to standard inspection schedule A method of establishing a quality inspection result analysis system in shipbuilding according to a quality result collection / assessment / reporting procedure, characterized in that the inspection progress calculation is performed. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 검사 진도율 산정단계는,The test progress rate calculating step , 기간 및 호선을 지정하는 단계; Designating a period and a line; 검사 진도율을 산정하는 단계; 및 Calculating a test progress rate; And 결과를 분석하는 단계Steps to analyze the results 를 포함하여 이루어지는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.Quality inspection result analysis system construction method according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures, characterized in that made in the. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 업체 품질현황 산정단계에서는, In the company quality estimation step , 등급 결정을 통해 기자재 업체의 입고 및 출장 검사 여부를 결정하고 품질 평가를 통해 협력업체를 관리함에 있어서, 공식 검사결과 및 코멘트 처리능력, Check & 평가 Sheet의 품질보증(Quality Assurance, QA) 평가 등을 산정해 평가하고 그 평가결과에 관한 정보는 조달팀, 외주관리팀 등과 공유하는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스 템 구축 방법.Determining whether the equipment supplier receives goods and business trips through grade determination, and managing the supplier through quality evaluation, the official inspection results, comment processing capability, and quality assurance (QA) evaluation of Check & Evaluation Sheet A method of establishing a quality inspection result analysis system for shipbuilding according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedure, which is calculated and evaluated and the information on the evaluation result is shared with the procurement team and outsourcing management team. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 업체 품질현황 산정단계는,The company's quality status calculation stage , 기자재 및 사외 검사결과를 취합하는 단계; Collecting equipment and external inspection results; Check & 평가 Sheet의 품질보증(Quality Assurance, QA) 평가를 분석하는 단계; 및 Analyzing the Quality Assurance (QA) evaluation of the Check & Evaluation Sheet; And 업체 품질을 평가하는 단계Steps to Evaluate Business Quality 를 포함하여 이루어지는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.Quality inspection result analysis system construction method according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures, characterized in that made in the. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계에서는, In the bad welder selection and notification step , 월별 비파괴 검사 결과를 토대로 불량 용접사를 선정한 후 교육을 통한 기량향상을 수행함에 있어서, 품질검사 결과를 취합해 불량 용접사를 월별로 산정한 후 불량 용접사에 대해서는 보수교육을 통한 재시험을 실시해 자격여부의 유지를 판단하며, 불량 용접사에 따른 재작업의 결과에 대해서는 기성 공제 처리를 하는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.In selecting the poor welder based on the monthly non-destructive test results and performing the skill improvement through training, the quality test result is collected and the bad welder is calculated monthly. A method of establishing a quality inspection result analysis system for shipbuilding according to the quality result collection / assessment / reporting procedure, which is determined, and the result of the rework according to the defective welder is a deduction. 제1항에 있어서, The method of claim 1, 상기 불량 용접사 선정 및 통보단계는,The bad welder selection and notification step , 용접사별 불량율을 집계하는 단계; Counting a defective rate for each welder; 불량 용접사를 선정하는 단계; Selecting a bad welder; 불량 용접사에게 통보하는 단계; 및 Notifying the bad welder; And 기성 공제 처리하는 단계Steps to Process Deductions 를 포함하여 이루어지는 것을 특징으로 하는 품질결과 취합/평가/보고 절차에 따른 선박건조상의 품질검사결과 분석 시스템 구축 방법.Quality inspection result analysis system construction method according to the quality result collection / evaluation / reporting procedures, characterized in that made in the.
KR1020060063010A 2006-07-05 2006-07-05 A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production KR20080004241A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020060063010A KR20080004241A (en) 2006-07-05 2006-07-05 A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020060063010A KR20080004241A (en) 2006-07-05 2006-07-05 A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20080004241A true KR20080004241A (en) 2008-01-09

Family

ID=39215118

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020060063010A KR20080004241A (en) 2006-07-05 2006-07-05 A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20080004241A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112766694A (en) * 2021-01-12 2021-05-07 中化兴中石油转运(舟山)有限公司 Safety quality control informatization system for oil tanker arriving at port
CN113449395A (en) * 2021-07-08 2021-09-28 西安热工研究院有限公司 Subcritical boiler drum downcomer and tube seat state evaluation method based on off-line inspection
CN116720790A (en) * 2023-08-09 2023-09-08 中国标准化研究院 Typical part sampling inspection method and system

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112766694A (en) * 2021-01-12 2021-05-07 中化兴中石油转运(舟山)有限公司 Safety quality control informatization system for oil tanker arriving at port
CN113449395A (en) * 2021-07-08 2021-09-28 西安热工研究院有限公司 Subcritical boiler drum downcomer and tube seat state evaluation method based on off-line inspection
CN116720790A (en) * 2023-08-09 2023-09-08 中国标准化研究院 Typical part sampling inspection method and system
CN116720790B (en) * 2023-08-09 2023-10-20 中国标准化研究院 Typical part sampling inspection method and system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Parida et al. Maintenance productivity and performance measurement
Meissner et al. Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making
Bohan et al. Pinpointing the real cost of quality in a service company
Formoso et al. Evaluation of the impact of the last planner system on the performance of construction projects
Laporte et al. Measuring the cost of software quality of a large software project at bombardier transportation: a case study
Williams Benefits of IVHM: an analytical approach
Felderer et al. Experiences and challenges of introducing risk-based testing in an industrial project
JP2022103101A (en) Construction method for quality database for vessel, construction program for quality database, integrated data platform, and use method for integrated data platform
KR20080004241A (en) A method of analyzing quality test result for a ship production
Machado et al. A qualitative study of outsourced aeronautical maintenance: The case of Brazilian organizations
KR102036774B1 (en) Method for evaluating performance using qsc and recordable media thereof
Praharsi et al. Six sigma implementation and analysis-An empirical study of a traditional boat building industry in Indonesia
Haase et al. Assessment of reliability implementation in manufacturing enterprises
Dalcı et al. Quality costs and their importance in cost and management accounting
Muendler Offshoring and the Onshore Composition of Occupations, Tasks and Skills Sascha O. Becker, Karolina Ekholm and
Kamar et al. A conceptual framework of safety and health in construction management
Ahmad et al. On minimizing software defects during new product development using enhanced preventive approach
Olivieri Hardware and software readiness: A systems approach
Al-Rubaye Assessment of the quality of a construction organization in the world
Calvetti et al. Agile methodology to performance measure and identification of impact factors in the labour productivity of industrial workers
Windmark et al. Assessment of a cost-model on sustainability for a proposal for a framework for the evaluation of sustainable manufacturing
Murdoch et al. Measuring safety: applying PSM to the system safety domain
Jung A test process improvement model for embedded software developments
Sharma et al. Advanced Techniques for Maintenance Modeling and Reliability Analysis of Repairable Systems
Kharb Proposed CEM (Cost Estimation Metrics): estimation of cost of quality in software testing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WITN Withdrawal due to no request for examination