KR20070018912A - Method for obtaining graded pore structure in scaffolds for tissues and bone, and scaffolds with graded pore structure for tissue and bone - Google Patents

Abstract

As a scafford for one or more of tissue regeneration and bone growth, the support is made from two or more polymers and the polymers are disclosed having different biodegradation rates. The first polymer of the two or more polymers is eluted by a solvent and all other polymers are inert to the solvent and have a lower dissolution rate in the solvent. The support has a classified porosity that is high porosity at the surface of the support and low porosity at the core of the support.

Scaffolds, tissue engineering, tissue regeneration, bone growth, porosity, leaching, compression molding.

Description

Method for obtaining graded pore structure in scaffolds for tissues and bone, and scaffolds with graded pore structure for tissue and bone}

The present invention relates to a method for obtaining a graded pore structure in a scaffold for tissues and bones, and to a support for tissues and bones having a graded pore structure. In particular, but not limited to, the classified pore structure provides initial structural strength and enables tissue growth with controlled degradation.

Tissue engineering techniques generally require the use of a temporary support as a three-dimensional template for initial cell attachment and subsequent tissue formation. The ability of the support to be metabolized by the body allows the support to be gradually replaced by new longitudinals to form a functioning tissue.

Many conventional techniques have been developed to design and manufacture supports, from fiber bonding, solvent casting to particulate leaching. Rapid prototyping technology has also made it possible to design and manufacture supports using computer controlled technology.

Biodegradable polymers are attractive candidates for scaffolding material because they degrade as new tissues form and ultimately leave no foreign material in the body. Some techniques, such as salt leaching, gas foaming, emulsion freeze-drying, three-dimensional printing, and phase separation, are highly porous polymer supports for tissue engineering. Was developed to generate. However, developing clinically useful scaffolds for bones, tissues and organs remains a challenge.

The support is expected to have the following features for use in tissue engineering:

(i) a porous three-dimensional structure with interconnected pore networks for cell / tissue growth and transport of nutrients and metabolic wastes;

(ii) be biodegradable or bioresorbable at a controllable degradation rate and resorption rate consistent with cell / tissue growth in vitro / in vivo;

(iii) the surface chemistry of the surface should be suitable for cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation;

(iv) have suitable mechanical properties in harmony with the mechanical properties of the tissue at the site of implantation; And

(v) Must be easily machined to form various shapes and sizes.

In addition to the features described above, the support should be able to perform guided tissue regeneration. This requires functionally classified features throughout the three-dimensional network. Among these, pore size, porosity, and surface area (surface-to-volume ratio) are widely recognized as important parameters for tissue engineering supports. Other architectural properties such as pore shape, pore wall shape, and inter-pore interconnectivity of scaffolding materials are also important for cell inoculation, migration, growth, mass transport, gene expression and new tissue formation in three dimensions. Is suggested.

Four kinds of biomaterials have been experimentally and / or clinically studied as support materials for tissue engineering applications:

(i) synthetic organic materials such as, for example, aliphatic polyesters, polyethylene glycols;

(ii) synthetic inorganic materials such as, for example, hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, plaster of Paris, glass ceramics;

(iii) natural organic materials such as, for example, collagen, fibrin glue, hyaluronic acid; And

(iv) natural inorganic materials such as, for example, coralline hydroxyapatite.

In general, the support should be made from a highly biocompatible material that is implanted into the human body and does not cause an immunorejection reaction.

Technical constraints in current processes and equipment place serious limitations in achieving a support design with the desired interconnections of pores. A simple example of process constraints is stereolithography. This requires a photo-curable polymer to obtain the desired structure and is limited in the maximum strength attainable. Three-dimensional fritting techniques to obtain the desired structure are dependent on the binder formulation. Methods such as salt elution and phase separation are limited in forming the interconnections of the required pores.

Current tissue engineering supports use rapid prototyping or gas bubbles / solvent dissolution to obtain a porous structure.

In a preferred embodiment, a support for tissue regeneration or bone growth is provided, wherein the support is made from two or more polymers. Polymers have different rates of bio-degradability. The first polymer of the two or more polymers may be eluted (or removed) by a solvent and the remaining polymers of the two or more polymers may be inert to the solvent or have a lower solubility in that solvent. The support may have a classified porosity that is high porosity at its surface and low porosity at its core.

In another embodiment, a support for tissue regeneration or bone growth is provided, wherein the support is made from two or more polymers. The first polymer of the two or more polymers may be eluted (or removed) by the solvent and the remaining polymers of the two or more polymers may be inert to the solvent or have a lower dissolution rate in that solvent.

According to another aspect, a support for tissue regeneration or bone growth is provided; The support has a classified porosity that is high porosity at the surface of the support and low porosity at the core of the support. The support can be made from two or more polymers with different biodegradation rates. Additionally or alternatively, the support may be prepared from two or more polymers, wherein the first polymer of the two or more polymers may be eluted (or removed) by a solvent, and the remaining polymers of the two or more polymers may be It may be inert or have a lower dissolution rate in the solvent.

In a final aspect, a method of preparing a support for tissue regeneration or bone growth is provided; The method is:

(a) blending two or more polymers to form a polymer blend;

(b) forming the support from the polymer mixture;

(c) eluting the support with a solvent to remove the first polymer in the at least two polymers, and the remaining polymers in the at least two polymers are inert to the solvent or have a lower dissolution rate in the solvent. A dissolution step.

The polymer may be milled before mixing. All polymers of the two or more polymers can have different biodegradation rates. Leaching can only occur for a portion of the support. The portion may be the surface of the support or an adjacent portion thereof, but may not be the core of the support. Preferably, the first polymer has a faster biodegradation rate.

Molding can be by one or more methods selected from compression molding, injection molding, rapid molding, and three-dimensional printing. Press molding may be performed at a pressure of 0 to 20 Mpa, and at a temperature in the range of 25 ° C to 80 ° C. Elution can be carried out in an ultrasonic bath of the solvent, the solvent is preferably at a temperature in the range from 25 ° C. to 50 ° C., preferably at a frequency in the range from 1 KHz to 40 KHz and exposed. The time is preferably in the range of 5 minutes to 120 minutes. Two or more polymers may be ground and mixed in a cryogenic mill or ground and mixed in a cold mill to form a desired particle size in the range of 20 to 500 μm.

Milling may be performed in cycles that may depend on the desired particle size for the polymer and the type of polymer. Grinding may be carried out at a frequency in the range of 15 to 30 cycles, each 1 minute, and the impact rate may be 15 closes / second.

In all embodiments, the two or more polymers are pure synthetic polymers such as polyglycolide, poly-L-lactide, poly-DL-lactide, polylactide co-glycolide, polycaprolactone, or polyhydroxybutate; Or a mixture of synthetic and natural polymers, or a natural polymer. The solvent may be acetone, dichloromethane, hexfluoroisopropanol, chloroform, or an alcohol or similar organic solvent.

Two polymers may be present in ratios ranging from 60:40 to 30:70.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In order that the present invention may be readily understood and realized, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of non-limiting examples, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG.

1 shows one embodiment of a support;

FIG. 2 is a vertical cross-sectional view of the support of FIG. 1; FIG.

3 is a cofocal image of two samples after elution with different solvents;

4 is an optical image of a sample before and after elution with different solvents;

5 is a porosity profile graph of a sample; And

6 illustrates one embodiment of the support preparation.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

1, 2 and 6, one embodiment of a support 10 for tissue regeneration and / or bone growth is shown.

In order for the support 10 to mimic tissue and improve the quality of tissue regeneration / bone growth that occurs in the implant, the support 10 has classified properties including classified porosity. This contributes to obtaining optimal in-growth of different tissues and cells and enhances the implant's ability to withstand various mechanical loads at specific sites of the implant. The classified structure of the pores 12 assists in delivering growth agents in a controlled manner. Thus, it supports to have controlled and induced bone formation and angiogenesis. Polymer mixtures of different polymers with different degradation rates, preferably with degradation rates that are compatible with the formation of tissues, bones and blood vessels, are used. This provides sufficient support and strength to the support to support the regeneration process.

The pores 12 are classified to allow growth to commence from the surface, and the core 14 of the support 10 provides the necessary support and retardation of tissue growth so that blood vessel formation can occur at the core.

In one preferred embodiment, the required number of polymers may be used depending on the required properties of the support to be constructed, but two different polymers are used. For example, three or four kinds of polymers may be used.

When two kinds of polymers are used, the ratio of the two kinds of polymers may be in the range of 60:40 to 30:70. Even in this case, the exact ratio will depend on the desired properties of the support to be built. The polymer may be a natural polymer or a synthetic polymer and may be polyglycolide, polylactide (including poly DL-lactide and poly L-lactide), polylactide-co-glyclide, polycaprolactone, and polyhydroxybutyrate (polyhydroxylutrate), including but not limited to.

To prepare the support 10, the polymer is selected, in suitable proportions, ground into powder and mixed to form a polymeric blend. The mixed powder is sieved to a constant size and used to prepare the support. Subsequently, the support is subjected to secondary processing. Grinding is carried out in cold mills and may include mixing.

Secondary treatment is controlled leaching of one of the polymers in the polymer mixture. Elution improves surface porosity by the use of a solvent 20, preferably an organic solvent, but can have a reduced concentration of pores 12 in the core 14 of the support 10. Only the first polymer is mainly removed by elution, using a solvent that reacts only with the first polymer and not with the remaining polymer (s) or with limited or slower reactivity to the remaining polymer (s). This requires that all other polymers be inert to the solvent, have a lower reaction rate for that solvent, or have a lower dissolution rate for that solvent. Elution can be enhanced by controlling the temperature of the elution solvent by agitation such as the use of a heater 16 and / or ultrasonic agitation using an ultrasonic table 18 or an ultrasonic ultrasonicator.

By having different proportions of polymers in different regions of the support, different porosities will result from elution. Alternatively or additionally, the elution process may be controlled such that the elution is made to a greater extent at the surface of the support and at a smaller extent at the core 14 of the support 10. This may control the immersion rate of the support 10 and the immersion time in the vessel containing the solvent so that the solvent does not or completely dissolve the first polymer near the core. Elution begins at the surface of the support 10 and proceeds toward the core 14 through the pores 12 formed by the elution, thereby controlling the duration, temperature, and agitation in the solvent vessel, thereby controlling the core 14. ) May be partially eluted or free from the core 14 of the support 10. In this manner, the pores 12 will decrease in number, size, and connectivity from the surface 22 of the support 10 to the core of the support 10.

The higher the porosity, the faster the biodegradation rate, and the lower the porosity, the slower the biodegradation rate will be. By having a higher porosity at the surface 22 where tissue / bone regeneration / growth occurs earlier and fastest, the support 10 will biodegrade as regeneration / growth occurs. Due to the lower porosity in the core 14, the support will maintain structural strength as the tissue / bone regenerates / grows so that the combined strength will be relatively constant.

By having two or more different polymers with different biodegradation rates, this can be enhanced. In addition, polymers that decompose more quickly are degraded through the deeper portion 14, thus enhancing tissue / bone regeneration / growth. It is desirable that the polymer eluted by the solvent has a faster / fastest biodegradation rate.

In one embodiment, the polyglycolide particles, poly L-lactide particles and polylactide co-glycolide particles were ground at a frequency of 15 to 30 cycles, 1 minute per cycle. The exact number of cycles used depends on one or more of the polymer used, the particle size of the polymer, and the glass transition temperature. Particle sizes in the range of 20-500 μm are preferred. A close contact speed of 15 closes / sec was used.

The organic solvent used is acetone, dichloromethane, hexfluoroisopropanol, chloroform, alcohol, or another suitable organic solvent that selectively dissolves one of the polymers and is inert to the other polymers or has a lower dissolution rate. Can be selected from.

The manufacture of the support 10 can be made by methods such as rapid molding, for example, by compression molding, injection molding, or three-dimensional printing of the support using a suitable binder system. For example, compression molding at pressures of 0 to 20 MPa and temperatures in the range of 25 to 80 ° C. may be used.

The solvent may be placed in a bath in which the support is to be placed. The temperature of the solvent in the vessel may be in the range of 25 ° C to 50 ° C. The vessel may be an ultrasonic vessel using a frequency in the range of 1 KHz to 40 KHz. The exposure time of the support in the vessel may be in the range of 5 minutes to 120 minutes.

As is apparent from FIG. 3, there is good interconnection between the pores, and a good three-dimensional network of pores. The polymers used are:

(a) polyglycolide and polylactide co-glycolide in a 50:50 ratio eluted with dichloromethane; And

(b) polyglycolide and polyhydroxybutrate in a 50:50 ratio eluted with acetone.

4 is (a) before elution of the aforementioned sample; (b) after elution in dichloromethane; And (c) shows the sample after elution in acetone, showing a uniform distribution of surface pores and interconnections between them.

4 (d) shows the porosity distribution in the cores with pore size micropores in the range of less than 10 μm.

FIG. 5 shows two porosity profiles obtained after undergoing secondary treatment in poly L-lactide / polyglycolide samples. Porosity measurements were performed using a surface profilometer with a pore size resolution of greater than 10 μm.

While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in the foregoing description, those skilled in the art will understand that many variations or modifications in the details of design, construction or operation may be made without departing from the invention.

Claims (31)

A scafford for one or more of tissue regeneration and bone growth, wherein the support is made from two or more polymers, and the polymers have different biodegradation rates. As a support for one or more of tissue regeneration and bone growth, the support is made from two or more polymers, a first polymer of the two or more polymers is eluted by a solvent, and all other polymers of the two or more polymers are A support that is inert and is selected from the group consisting of polymers having a lower dissolution rate in the solvent. A support for one or more of tissue regeneration and bone growth, wherein the support has a classified porosity that is high porosity at the surface of the support and low porosity at the depth of the support. The support of claim 3, wherein the support is made from two or more polymers having different biodegradation rates. The method of claim 3, wherein the support is made from two or more polymers, a first polymer of the two or more polymers is eluted by a solvent, and all other polymers of the two or more polymers are inert to the solvent, And a support having a low dissolution rate. The method of claim 4, wherein the first polymer of the two or more polymers is eluted by a solvent, and all other polymers of the two or more polymers are from the group consisting of polymers that are inert to the solvent and have a lower dissolution rate in the solvent. The support selected. The method of claim 1, wherein the first polymer of the two or more polymers is eluted by a solvent, and all other polymers of the two or more polymers are from the group consisting of polymers that are inert to the solvent and have a lower dissolution rate in the solvent. The support selected. The support of claim 1, wherein the support has a classified porosity that is high porosity at the surface of the support and low porosity at the core of the support. The method of claim 1, 2 or 4 to 8, wherein the two or more polymers are natural polymers, mixtures of natural polymers and synthetic polymers, synthetic polymers, polyglycolides, polylactides, A support selected from the group consisting of poly L-lactide, poly DL-lactide, polylactide co-glycolide, poly-caprolactone, and polyhydroxybutyrate. 8. A support according to any one of claims 2, 5, 6, or 7, wherein said solvent is selected from the group consisting of organic solvents and inorganic solvents. The support of claim 10, wherein the organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of acetone, dichloromethane, hexfluoroisopropanol, chloroform, and alcohol. The support according to claim 1, 2 or 4 to 9, wherein the two polymers are present in a ratio in the range of 60:40 to 30:70. A method of making a support for at least one of tissue regeneration and bone growth; The method is: (a) blending two or more polymers to form a polymer blend; (b) forming the support from the polymer mixture; (c) eluting the support with a solvent to remove a first polymer of the at least two polymers, wherein the remaining polymers of the at least two polymers are inert to the solvent. The method of claim 13, wherein all polymers of the two or more polymers have different biodegradation rates. The method of claim 13 or 14, wherein the two polymers are present in a ratio in the range of 60:40 to 30:70. The method of claim 13, wherein the two or more polymers are natural polymers, mixtures of natural polymers and synthetic polymers, synthetic polymers, polyglycolide, polylactide, poly L-lactide, poly DL- Lactide, polylactide co-glycolide, poly-caprolactone, and polyhydroxybutyrate. The method of claim 13, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of acetone, dichloromethane, hexfluoroisopropanol, chloroform, and alcohol. 18. The method of any one of claims 13-17, wherein the molding is performed by one or more methods selected from the group consisting of compression molding, injection molding, rapid molding, and three-dimensional printing. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the press molding is performed at a pressure in the range of 0 to 20 Mpa, and at a temperature in the range of 25 to 80 ° C. 20. The method of claim 13, wherein dissolution is controlled to be maximized at the surface of the support and minimized at the core of the support. The method of claim 14, wherein the first polymer has a faster biodegradation rate. 22. The method of any one of claims 13-21, wherein the dissolution is carried out in an ultrasonic bath containing the solvent. The method of claim 22, wherein the solvent is at a temperature in the range of 25 ° C. to 50 ° C., the frequency is in the range of 1 KHz to 40 KHz, and the exposure time is in the range of 5 minutes to 120 minutes. 24. The method of any of claims 13-23, wherein the two or more polymers are ground prior to mixing, and grinding and mixing are carried out in a cryogenic mill to form particle sizes in the range of 20 to 500 μm. How to be. The method of claim 24, wherein the milling is carried out in a cycle depending on one or more of the kind of the two or more polymers and the desired particle size of the two or more polymers. 26. The method of claim 24 or 25, wherein the milling is performed at a frequency of 15 to 30 cycles of 1 minute each. 27. The method of any one of claims 24 to 26, wherein during the milling, the adhesion rate is 15 closes / second. 28. The method of any one of claims 13-27, wherein the support has a classified porosity that is high porosity at the surface of the support and low porosity at the core of the support. 29. The method of any one of claims 13-28, wherein the elution comprises removal, and dissolution. 30. A support prepared by the method of any one of claims 13-29. 31. The support of any one of claims 2, 5-12, or 30, wherein elution comprises removal, and dissolution.

Images