KR200380990Y1 - Packet scheduling in a wireless local area network - Google Patents

Abstract

An access point configured to schedule packets in a wireless WLAN includes a mapping device, an allocation device, a queuing device, a selection device, and a transmitter. The mapping device is configured to map the packet for the access category (AC) based on the priority of the packet. The assigning device is configured to assign the packet to the traffic flow (TF) at one station based on the AC of the packet. The queuing device is configured to place a packet from the TF to the transmission queue for AC. The selection device is configured to select a packet from the transmission queue based on the QoS based contention resolution function. The transmitter is configured to send the selected packet.

Description

Packet scheduling access point in wireless LAN {PACKET SCHEDULING IN A WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK}

The present invention relates generally to wireless communication systems, and more particularly to packet scheduling of traffic flows in a wireless local area network (LAN).

In an 802.11e-based environment, an enhanced distributed coordination function (EDCA) classifies traffic flows into access categories according to the priority of the application delivered by each traffic flow. Different arbitration interframe space (AIFS), minimum contention window (CWmin), and maximum contention window (CWmax) parameters are assigned per traffic flow according to its AC. AIFS is a period during which a station (STA) waits after receiving an acknowledgment from an access point (AP) that received a previously transmitted packet. Higher priority ACs have shorter AIFS than lower priority ACs, so higher priority traffic has less latency before channel access. The CWmin and CWmax values represent the lower and upper limits of the contention window (CW) used in the back-off procedure. EDCA properly sets AIFS, CWmin, and CWmax to ensure that higher priority traffic flows have more opportunities to access the channel.

The 802.11e standard specifies a contention and backoff mechanism between several ACs. However, scheduling of APs between different traffic flows belonging to different STAs within the same AC is not defined by the above standard and depends on the AP implementation.

Access points for scheduling packets in a wireless LAN include mapping devices, assigning devices, queuing devices, selecting devices, and transmitters. The mapping device is configured to map the packet to an access category (AP) based on the user priority of the packet. The assigning device assigns the packet to the traffic flow (TF) in the station based on the AC of the packet. The queuing device is configured to place a packet from the TF to the transmission queue for the AC. The selection device selects a packet from the transmission queue based on a quality of service-based contention resolution function. The transmitter is configured to send the selected packet.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

The present invention implements QoS based internal contention solving function in AP. QoS-based functions operate per AC to resolve contention among multiple traffic flows within the same AC.

The contention resolution function is initiated when there are packets in two or more traffic flow queues in the same AC, both queues attempting channel access at frame transmission time. The output of the contention resolution function is the internal contention priority for each AC, which is used for channel access.

1 is a diagram illustrating a delay-based QoS function 100 within an EDCA operation. The EDCA function supports AC. As shown in Table 1 below, eight different user priorities (UP) are mapped to four ACs.

Priority User priority (equivalent to UP-802.1D user priority) 802.1D assignment Access Category (AC) Specify (informational) Unique assignment lowest rank Top One BK AC_BK Background AC_1 2 - AC_BK Background AC_1 0 BE AC_BE Best effort AC_2 3 EE AC_VI Video AC_3 4 CL AC_VI Video AC_3 5 VI AC_VI Video AC_3 6 VO AC_VO Video AC_4 7 NC AC_VO Video AC_4

In step 102, the packet to be transmitted to the STA is mapped to the corresponding AC based on its UP. In the mapping function, UPs are mapped to each AC, and packets from different traffic flows are sent into each corresponding queue in its AC.

In the 802.11e standard, a STA can have one or more traffic flows, depending on the applications running from that STA and the number of concurrent sessions of the same application, which can be scattered across AC. For implementation purposes, each STA is limited to have up to four traffic flows, each traffic flow supporting a different application. It is noteworthy that although the STA may have four or more traffic flows and also support concurrent sessions of the same application, the present invention operates in the same manner in this environment.

Thus, AC can support up to N traffic flows, where N is the number of STAs in the system. The AC may have no traffic flow when none of the STAs are running an application belonging to that AC.

At step 104, a packet is assigned to traffic flows within the STA based on the AC. In step 106, packets from each traffic flow are placed in a transmission queue for the corresponding AC. In step 108, one packet from each AC's transmission queue is selected by the QoS based contention solving function based on the AC's transmission rate and delay requirements (this function is more specific with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4 below). To explain). At step 110, the selected packet is attempted to be sent, and at step 112 it is determined whether a transmission collision with another packet will occur. If it is determined that there is no conflict, the selected packet is sent in step 114 and the function ends in step 116.

If a collision with another channel is anticipated in step 112, then a high priority packet is transmitted in step 120. In step 122, the contention window value (CW) for the low priority packet is compared with the CWmax value for the AC associated with that packet. If the CW value is less than CWmax, the CW value is updated to the following Equation 1 in step 124.

CW = ((CW + 1) × 2)-1

If the CW value is updated or the CW value is greater than or equal to CWmax in step 122, the low priority packet enters the backoff mode for the same time as CW in step 126, and the countdown timer is started. When the countdown timer reaches 0 in step 128, the idle state of the channel is determined by detecting carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA / CA) in step 130. If the channel is idle, the function returns to step 124 to reset the CW value and resume the countdown timer.

If the channel is idle, a low priority packet is sent (step 132) and the function ends (step 116).

The function 100 will now be described with reference to FIG. 2, which shows an example of an EDCA implementation model with four STAs. Each STA runs four different applications mapped to different ACs, and generates one traffic flow of each STA in each AC. The packet is assigned to the traffic flow of the STA based on the AC, for example, the second traffic flow TF_2 from station B (STA_B) is at AC_2. Packets from each traffic flow are inserted into separate transmission queues, and the QoS-based contention resolution function names one packet to be sent from each AC.

Once a packet is selected from AC, e.g. AC_2, the packet is ready for transmission (i.e. it is not in backoff mode and is detecting that the channel is idle) and then attempts to transmit on the channel. do. If there are other packets ready to be transmitted from other ACs, for example AC_4, this causes an internal conflict between the ACs. In this case, the packet from AC_2 (high priority) allows AC (AC_4) with high priority to access and transmit the channel. AC_2 updates its CW [AC_2] to the value ((CW [AC_2] +1) × 2) -1, and if CW [AC_2] has already reached CWmax [AC_2], it leaves the CW value unchanged. .

The packet from AC_2 then starts the backoff procedure and decrements the backoff counter until it reaches zero. If the channel is idle then the packet attempts to transmit. Until a packet from AC_2 is sent, the QoS based contention resolution function will not be triggered for AC_2, and no packet will be named for transmission for the AC_2 category.

If the backoff timer has reached zero for a packet waiting at AC_2 and there are no packets from other categories that the AC_2 packet can collide with, then AC_2 will send this packet. If a collision occurs, a new back off procedure must be initiated to update CW [AC_2] according to the value ((CW [AC_2] +1) × 2) -1.

After successive transmissions, the AC that just sent the last transmission within the allowed transmission opportunity (TXOP) updates its CW [AC] value and backs to the next named packet, regardless of the collision with the higher priority AC. Will start off procedure. TXOP is the point in time where an STA can begin transmitting frames for a certain period of time. During the TXOP, the STA can transmit as many frames as possible in the TXOP, and the length of the TXOP is set according to the traffic class (TC) associated with the data. EDCA TXOP shall not exceed the TXOP limit notified by the AP. This ensures that the high priority AC does not continually win the low priority AC in the AP whenever it has a transmission, and also through the appropriate setup values of CWmin [AC], CWmax [AC], AIFS [AC]. This is necessary to ensure prioritization.

Traffic flow in the EDCA initiates a backoff procedure in three cases:

1. Due to internal collision with upper AC

2. Due to external collisions with other STAs sharing a wireless channel

3. After designating another packet for transmission, after the final transmission within the assigned TXOP

If there is only one traffic flow queue in an AC, the QoS based contention solving function will not be effective. Because there is no other queue to compete with.

Contention Resolution Function

In each queue, a priority index is calculated according to the delay and data rate criteria. Data rate index calculation takes into account the instantaneous data rate used to transmit the packet. Higher data rates require less media time and are therefore given higher priority. This improves the overall throughput of the system, but can increase latency for users with low instantaneous data rates. The delay index calculation reflects the QoS requirements per traffic flow, taking into account the delay of the first packet in all queues (ie, the time the packet spent in the queue) and the queue size. A packet with the highest priority index (combination of data rate and delay) within the same AC is intended to compete for transmission with other ACs.

3 shows a flow diagram of a contention resolution function 300 that determines the next packet based on the estimated data rate and the current delay caused by the packet. The competitive solution function 300 is also shown diagrammatically in FIG. 4.

There is one queue for each AC, indexed by "n". Within each queue, a priority index is calculated for each packet based on delay and data rate criteria. The delay index includes a parameter that depends on the AC.

The data rate index of each queue in AC _n is calculated according to the following equation.

Where the maximum data rate is the maximum data rate allowed by the applicable standard. For example, the maximum data rate in 802.11b is 11 Mbps and the maximum data rate in 802.11g is 54 Mbps.

The delay index of each queue in AC _n is described in equation (3).

Delay Index _n = (A [ACn] × First_Pkt_Delay _n (normalized)) + (B [AC _n ] × Queue_Size _n ) + (C [AC _n ] × Avg_Pkt_Delay _n (normalized))

Wherein _n is First_Pkt_Delay and delay the first packet experienced in AC _n, Queue_Size _n is the size of the AC to go _{n, n} is Avg_Pkt_Delay moving average (moving average) of the packet delay in the AC _n over the M packets. A, B, and C are weighted coefficients per AC for packet delay, queue size, and average packet delay, respectively. Initial values of the weighting coefficients applicable to all ACs as a starting point are A = 0.4, B = 0.3, and C = 0.3. The values of A, B, and C can be adjusted in operation by monitoring the average queue size. If the queue size gets too large, you can increase the C value by decreasing the A or B value. As another alternative, depending on the AC, different settings can be used for the three weighting factors, which highlight different QoS aspects of the traffic carried by each AC and prioritize more effectively in accessing the channel.

The first and third terms of the delay index equation may be normalized to an integer value so as not to be overshadowed by the second term of the queue size. The queue with the highest delay index calculation will be more likely to get the right to access the channel according to the priority index calculation (step 306).

Priority Index = (alpha × data rate index) + (beta × delay index)

Here alpha is a weighting factor for reducing the influence of the transmission data rate, beta is a weighting factor for reducing the influence of the delay. In one embodiment of the present invention, alpha is 0.5, beta is 0.5. This value can be adjusted over time by monitoring the number of packets that have experienced a delay of X seconds. If the number of packets exceeds 10% (this value can be adjusted), you can adjust the weights of alpha and beta. That is, it can reduce alpha and increase beta.

The first packet in the traffic flow with the highest priority index value is selected for transmission (step 308) and the function ends (step 310).

Access Point configured according to the present invention

An access point AP 500 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG. 5. The AP 500 includes a mapping device 502, an allocation device 504, a queuing device 506, a selection device 508, a transmitter 510, an antenna 512, a collision detection device 514, and a contention resolution device ( 516). The mapping device 502 is configured to map the packet to be transmitted by the STA to the AC according to the UP. The allocation device 504 is configured to assign the packet to the traffic flow in the STA based on the AC. The queue device 506 is configured to place packets from the traffic flow into the transmission queue for the corresponding AC.

The selection device 508 is configured to select packets in the transmission queue from each AC using QoS based contention resolution.

The transmitter 510 transmits the selected packet via the antenna. The collision detection device 514 is configured to detect whether the selected packet collides with another packet during transmission. The contention resolution device 516 is configured to resolve the conflict between the selected packet and another packet when a conflict occurs.

6 shows details of a contention resolution device 516. The contention resolution device 516 includes a priority determination device 602, a comparison device 604, a countdown timer 606, and a channel detector 608. The priority determining apparatus 602 is configured to determine whether a colliding packet is a high priority packet. High priority packets are transmitted by the transmitter 510. The comparison device 604 compares the CW value for the packet of low priority with the CWmax value for AC associated with the packet and updates the CW value as needed. Low priority packets enter the backoff mode for the period counted by the countdown timer 606. When countdown timer 606 expires, channel detector 608 detects whether the channel is idle by CSMA / CA sensing. If the channel is idle, low priority packets are sent by transmitter 510. If the channel is not idle, countdown timer 606 is restarted and the lower priority packet enters another backoff period.

Although FIGS. 5 and 6 are shown as separate elements, these elements may be implemented on one integrated circuit (IC), such as an ASIC, multiple ICs, discrete components, or a combination of discrete components and ICs. .

Although features and elements of the present invention are described in the preferred embodiments with specific combinations, each feature and element may be used alone or in various combinations (with or without other features or elements) of the invention. Without features and elements). While specific embodiments of the present invention are shown and described, various modifications and variations are possible to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. The contents of the present invention described above are for illustrative purposes only, and the present invention is not limited thereto.

According to the present invention, a high priority traffic flow can access a channel by scheduling a packet of traffic flow within a wireless local area network (WLAN).

1 is a flowchart illustrating a packet scheduling method according to the present invention.

2 is a schematic diagram illustrating EDCA functionality with a QoS-based contention resolution function operating on multiple traffic flows.

3 is a flow diagram of a contention solving function operating within the same AC.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the competitive solution function shown in FIG. 3. FIG.

5 is a block diagram of an AP according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of the contention resolution device shown in FIG. 5; FIG.

Claims (11)

An access point (AP) configured to schedule packets in a WLAN, A mapping device configured to map the packet to an preset category based on the user priority of the packet, An allocation device configured to assign the packet to a traffic flow (TF) of a station based on the AC of the packet; A queuing device configured to place a packet from the TF into a transmission queue for the AC; A selection device configured to select a packet from the transmission queue based on a quality of a QoS based contention resolution function; A transmitter configured to transmit the selected packet And an access point configured to schedule packets in the WLAN. The method of claim 1, wherein the selection device, Calculate the priority value for each TF, And access the first packet in the TF having the highest priority value. 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the selection device is Priority index = (alpha × data rate index) + (beta × delay index) Will be calculated according to Wherein alpha, beta are weighting coefficients, the data rate index is based on an instantaneous data transmission rate, and the delay index is based on the size of the queue and the delay of the first packet of the transmission queue. Configured access point. 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the selection device is And calculate the data rate index according to: And wherein the maximum data transfer rate is the maximum data transfer rate allowed in the local area network. 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the selection device is Delay Index _n = (A [AC _n ]) × First_Pkt_Delay _n (normalized) + (B [ACn] × Queue_Size _n ) + (C [ACn] × Avg_Pkt_Delay _n (normalized)) Will be calculated according to Where A is the weighting factor for packet delay, First_Pkt_Delay _n is the delay experienced by the first packet of AC _n , B is the weighting factor for queue size, Queue_Size _n is the size of AC _n , and C is the average packet delay And weighting factor for Avg_Pkt_Delay _n is an access point configured to schedule packets in the WLAN, where Avg_Pkt_Delay _n is a moving average of the packet delay of AC _n for a predetermined number of packets. 4. The access point of claim 3, wherein the selection device is configured to dynamically adjust the alpha and beta. 7. The access point of claim 6, wherein the selection device is configured to adjust the alpha and beta based on the number of packets experiencing a predetermined delay. 10. The access point of claim 1, further comprising a collision detection device configured to detect whether a transmission collision with another packet occurs. 9. The access point of claim 8, wherein if the collision detection device does not detect a collision, it transmits the selected packet by the transmitter. 9. The access point of claim 8, further comprising a contention resolution device configured to resolve the collision detected by the collision detection device. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the contention resolution device is A prioritization device configured to determine which packets of the collision are high priority packets and which packets are low priority packets and to transmit the high priority packets to the transmitter; A comparison device configured to adjust a contention window value for the low priority packet; A countdown timer configured to count down the contention window determined by the comparison device; An access point configured to schedule packets in a WLAN comprising a channel detector configured to detect whether a transport channel is idle.