KR20010092008A - Apparatus and method for serving a law suit using internet - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: A lawsuit service system and method using the internet is provided to know a lawsuit procedure thoroughly by law consumers by providing practice procedures of a civil case and a criminal case on which the law consumers want to consult to the law consumers and writing a general contract regarding the lawsuit using the Internet. CONSTITUTION: A web server(100) processes data regarding lawsuits such as a civil practice lawsuit and a criminal practice lawsuit selected by a law consumer through a law consumer computer(600) connected with an internet network(500). A system management unit(200) performs a security management, a fault recovery/backup management, a contents management, and a various statistic management of the data processed in the web server(100). A DB server(300) stores, updates, deletes, and retrieves the data regarding the lawsuit processed in the web server(100), manages a table regarding a general contract form, and stores data backup information. A manager unit(400) manages data inputted by the law consumer and transmits information regarding the lawsuit to the law consumer through the law consumer computer(600).

Description

Apparatus and method for serving a law suit using internet}

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for legal litigation service using the Internet. More specifically, the present invention provides law consumers with simulated litigation procedures for civil and criminal cases that legal consumers want to consult, and provides general contracts for legal litigation over the Internet. The present invention relates to a legal litigation service apparatus and method for allowing legal consumers to become familiar with legal litigation by making it use.

Recently, the financial, legal, and medical fields operating offline have emerged as a new business field in connection with the online Internet.The offline legal field is provided by professional lawyers based on professional legal knowledge. The reality is that the legal consumer has no choice but to delegate all matters about the law to the lawyer in the event of a dispute. In particular, legal proceedings cause a lot of difficulties due to the consumption of time and the high cost of fees for the legal consumer who is a party, and often causes a serious legal and physical disadvantage of the legal consumer due to complicated legal proceedings. As a result, more and more sites are attempting legal services online, and these legal services sites simply post their types of lawsuits and assign the appropriate attorneys to provide legal advice. have. However, it is possible to acquire a simple legal knowledge and legal solution by such a simple response, but it is difficult to know the legal procedures such as more professional civil lawsuits and criminal lawsuits required by law consumers.

Accordingly, the present invention has been made to solve such a problem, and the present invention allows legal consumers to experience mock proceedings on the Internet to receive a high quality legal service, and to accurately predict the proceedings of law to provide legally appropriate defenses. The purpose of the present invention is to provide a legal litigation service apparatus and method that can prevent unnecessary litigation.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a legal litigation service apparatus and method for allowing a legal consumer to select a civil litigation, criminal litigation, etc. on the Internet to perform a mock litigation by role playing or a general procedure.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a document via e-mail with guidance on the precautions, time required, and litigation costs in the course of proceedings in civil litigation, criminal litigation, etc. It is to provide a legal litigation service apparatus and method for searching the relevant legal term from time to time.

Another object of the present invention is to reduce the burden on the legal consumer involved in the lawsuit by making a general contract for legal proceedings directly on the Internet, and by providing guidance through e-mail support, etc. The present invention provides a legal litigation service apparatus and method for helping consumers understand the form preparation and litigation.

1 is a block diagram of a legal litigation service device using the Internet according to the present invention,

2 is a flowchart of a legal litigation service method using the Internet according to the present invention;

3 is a detailed flowchart of a civil simulation contract process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG.

4 is a detailed flowchart of a criminal mock case contract process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG. 2;

5A and 5B are detailed flowcharts of a civil mock litigation process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG. 2;

6A to 6C are detailed flowcharts of the criminal mock litigation process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG.

<Explanation of symbols for the main parts of the drawings>

100: web server 200: system management means

300: DB server 400: administrator means

500: Internet 600: Legal Consumer Computer

A feature of the present invention for achieving the above object is a web server for processing data on the lawsuit selected by the legal consumer through a legal consumer computer connected to the Internet network; System management means for performing security management, disaster recovery / backup management, content management, various statistics management, etc. of the data processed in the web server; A database server for storing, updating, deleting, retrieving, managing tables, and data backup information of the data relating to the lawsuit processed by the web server; And administrative means for managing the data entered by the legal consumer and sending information about the lawsuit to the legal consumer via email.

Preferably, the lawsuit is characterized in that the civil mock suit, criminal mock suit, and the like.

Preferably, the table is a table relating to a general contract form relating to the lawsuit.

Another aspect of the present invention is a legal litigation service method for a legal consumer to conduct a mock litigation procedure through an internet network, the legal consumer for legally and forcibly resolve conflicts of interest and disputes concerning the life relationship between the two individuals. A civil mock litigation process in which a series of procedures for coordination are performed through a web server, a civil case document is prepared and stored in a database server; And a criminal that the legal consumer performs a series of procedures for legally and forcibly resolving and coordinating conflicts of interest and disputes between criminals through the web server, and prepares criminal case documents and stores them in the database server. To include a mock litigation process.

Preferably, the legal consumer further comprises a general contract written according to a procedure, and after the review by a legal expert, further comprising a contract preparation process that is sent back to the legal consumer via e-mail.

Preferably, the contract preparation process is characterized in that it comprises a civil mock case contract process and a criminal mock case contract process.

Preferably, the civil mock case contract process is a first step in which a law consumer logs in, selects a civil case document type and selects a written item, and inputs a case name and personal information of a plaintiff / defendant; The second process of determining whether the entered personal information includes the defendant's address, if the defendant's address is not provided, and if the defendant's address is provided, enter the purpose of the claim, the cause and the method of verification, and then select the competent court to complete the complaint. ; And judging whether or not the prepared complaint is to be reviewed by a legal expert, and if the legal expert wants to be reviewed by the legal expert, the legal expert includes a third process of e-mailing the review opinion to the legal consumer after reviewing the complaint.

Preferably, the criminal mock case contract process is a first process of selecting a criminal case document type and a complaint writing item and logging the case name after login of the legal consumer; A second process of judging whether or not an example of the complaint is made, and if an example of the complaint is made, a complaint is prepared according to the example; A third step of entering the personal information of the complainant and the complainant after the complainant has been completed, and then entering the complainant's facts and supporting documents and the date of the complainant; And selecting the competent police department / prosecutor's office and completing the complaint, and if the legal complaint is desired to be reviewed by a legal expert, the legal expert includes a fourth process of e-mailing a review opinion to the legal consumer after reviewing the complaint.

Preferably, the civil simulated litigation process determines whether the law consumer selects the case from the illustrated civil case case and proceeds with a preservation procedure such as a seizure / disposal, and performs a seizure / disposal procedure. A first step of receiving personal information through a legal consumer computer connected to a web server through an internet network; The second process of judging whether or not to make a complaint in person, and if the complaint is to be prepared by hand, the complaint should be prepared by the court of competent jurisdiction; A third step of completing the registration, paying the license fee and the delivery fee when the complaint is received, and notifying the plaintiff of the trial date; A fourth process of presenting the plaintiff at the trial date and determining whether the defendant is present, and if the defendant is not present, determining whether the defendant has not been served; A fifth process of performing the disclosure service procedure if the defendant has not been served, and determining whether the defendant has not attended again, and terminating the trial with the plaintiff's prevailing action if the defendant did not attend; If the defendant is present at trial or if the disclosure service has been carried out, the trial proceeds. If the plaintiff and the defendant's claim are not in conflict, the judgment is decided after the conclusion of the hearing. The sixth process of doing; A seventh process of completing and submitting a witness application and prepaying the fee if you apply for a witness; An eighth process of filing an evaluation of the evidence and proceeding to trial if no witnesses have been filed or costs have been paid; And a ninth process, in which the trial is terminated due to the prevailing manuscript or the judgment proceeding after the application for the appraisal of the evidence is conducted, the sentence is specified and the judgment is decided or appealed according to the appeal.

Preferably, the criminal simulation proceedings may be initiated by investigating if the law consumer directly writes a complaint and selects the case from the illustrated criminal case name, and decides to sue / complain to the police. The first process of prosecuting the prosecution if the lawsuit is to be investigated by the prosecution, or if the prosecution does not investigate the prosecution; A second process of requesting a warrant for arrest by the prosecution after probing the suspect's non-compliance or risk of attendance, and then requesting the warrant for the arrest by the prosecution and determining whether the judge issued the arrest warrant; If the judge issued an arrest warrant, the suspect was arrested, and the prosecution filed a warrant for the arrest within a certain time, and if the judge did not issue an arrest warrant, the judge judged whether there was a risk of extinction and escaping the evidence, A third process of proceeding with the investigation in spite of the claim of arrest warrant without risk of destruction or escape; If the prosecution filed a warrant for arrest on the court, the newspaper examines the suspect before detention and determines whether the judge issued a warrant for arrest.If the judge did not issue a warrant for arrest, the court dismisses the warrant of arrest and proceeds in spite of the investigation. process; A fifth process of determining whether the court ordered the release of the suspect by arresting the suspect if he or she issued a warrant of arrest and ordering the release by the court, and if the court did not order the release; If you have applied for bail before the bail, apply for bail after you apply for bail. If you do not apply for bail before, you can investigate the detained suspect and send it to the prosecution service. Sixth process; A seventh process of releasing when a court ordered release or permission to bail and sending it to the prosecution service after the police investigation in the state of release by bail or in the state of crippled state; An eighth step of determining whether the prosecution has been prosecuted or if the suspect is sent to the prosecution, whether the prosecution has been prosecuted by the prosecution; A ninth process of proceeding with the trial after the bail process and making a sentence, and determining whether to appeal according to the sentence; If the prosecution did not prosecute in the eighth process, the prosecution determined that the prosecution was informed. If the prosecution did not prosecute, the prosecution was suspended, the prosecution of the prosecution, and if the prosecution was prosecuted. A tenth process of making an order; And an eleventh process of judging whether to disobey the judge's abbreviated order, requesting a formal trial if not, and executing the sentence if not.

Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. First, in adding reference numerals to the components of each drawing, it should be noted that the same reference numerals are denoted by the same reference numerals as much as possible even if displayed on the other drawings.

1 is a block diagram of a legal litigation service device using the Internet according to the present invention.

In FIG. 1, the present invention comprises a web server 100, a system management means 200, a DB server 300, an administrator means 400, an internet network 500, a legal consumer computer 600.

The web server 100 processes data related to lawsuits such as civil simulation suits and criminal simulation suits selected by law consumers through the legal consumer computer 600 connected to the Internet network 500, and the system management means 200 Security management, failure recovery / backup management, content management, various statistics management, etc. of the data processed in the web server 100 is performed.

The DB server 300 stores, updates, deletes, retrieves, and manages a table relating to a general contract form relating to legal proceedings and data backup information about the legal proceedings processed by the web server 100. The 400 manages data input by the legal consumer and transmits information about the lawsuit through the legal consumer computer 600 to the legal consumer through e-mail.

2 is a flowchart of a legal litigation service method using the Internet according to the present invention.

In FIG. 2, in order for a legal consumer to conduct a simulated litigation procedure through the Internet network 500, the legal consumer logs in through the legal consumer computer 600 (step S100), whereby a civil / criminal simulated litigation contract is entered into the procedure. If written accordingly (step S200), after receiving a review by a legal expert through the manager means 400, the review opinion is sent back to the legal consumer via e-mail.

When the civil / criminal mock litigation contract is created in step S100, a legal consumer performs a series of procedures through the web server 100 to adjust legally and compulsorily to resolve conflicts of interest and disputes regarding life-life relations between the autographs and civil If a civil mock litigation contract is created by completing the case document (step S300), and a civil / criminal mock litigation contract is created in step S100, legal consumers are forced to resolve conflicts of interest and disputes regarding the criminal relations between the autographs and disputes. A series of procedures for the adjustment are performed through the web server 100 and a criminal case document is prepared to perform a criminal simulation litigation process (step S400).

After the step S300 or S400 is performed, data about the civil simulation lawsuit is stored in the DB server 300 (step S500), and the corresponding data is transmitted to the legal consumer using the legal consumer computer 600 (step S600). . The legal consumer logs out when the legal consumer receives data regarding a civil mock lawsuit, a criminal mock lawsuit, etc. in step S600 (step S700).

3 is a detailed flowchart of a civil simulation contract process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG.

In Fig. 3, in order to perform the civil simulation contract process, the legal consumer logs in (step S200a), selects a civil case document type (step S201a), selects a collectible item (step S202a), and sets a case name. (Step S203a), personal information such as the name, address, and contact information of the plaintiff / defendant is input (step S204a).

It is determined whether the personal information entered in step S204a has the defendant's address (step S205a), and if the defendant's address is absent in step S205a (step S206a), if the defendant's address is found in step S205a, the purpose and cause and proof of the claim are claimed. The method is entered (step S207a). After performing step S207a, a jurisdiction court is selected (step S208a), and a written complaint is completed (step S209a). The jury determines that the lawsuit prepared in step S209a wants to be reviewed by the legal expert (step S210a), and if the legal expert wants to be reviewed by the legal expert in step S210a, the legal expert sends a review opinion to the legal consumer by email (step S211a). .

4 is a detailed flowchart of the criminal mock case contract process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG.

In Fig. 4, in order to perform the criminal simulation contract process, the legal consumer performs login (step S200b). After performing step S200b, the legal consumer selects a criminal case document type (step S201b), and selects an item for preparing a complaint (step S202b).

If the complaint making item is selected in step S202b, the relevant incident name is searched (step S203b). If the case name is retrieved in step S203b, it is determined whether or not an example of the complaint is filed in the case (step S204b), and if an example of the complaint is shown in step S204b, a complaint is prepared according to the example (step S205b). If you have not seen an example of the complaint in step S204b or if the complaint has been made in step S205b, enter the personal information of the complainant and the accused (step S206b), and enter the fact and evidence documents and the date of the complaint (step S207b).

In step S207b, if the complaint facts, evidence documents, and the date of the complaint are input, the competent police station / prosecutor's office is selected (step S208b), and the collection is completed (step S209b). After completing the collection in step S209b, it is determined whether or not it is desired to be reviewed by a legal expert (step S210b). It sends out (step S211b).

5A and B are detailed flowcharts of a civil simulation litigation process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG. 2.

5A and 5B, in order to perform the civil simulation litigation process, the legal consumer logs in through the legal consumer computer 600 (step S301), and selects the case from the case names of the illustrated civil case (step S302). ). If the case is selected in step S302, it is determined whether to proceed with the maintenance procedure such as pressurization / disposal (step S303), and if it is to proceed with the maintenance procedure in step S303, the pressurization / disposal procedure is performed (step S304). If the maintenance procedure is not performed at step S303 or if the pressurization / disposal procedure is not performed at step S304, the legal consumer computer 600 is connected to the web server 100 through the Internet 500. Input is through (step S305).

If the personal information of the manuscript / defendant is input in step S302, it is determined whether or not to directly create a complaint (step S306). If you are going to create a complaint directly at step S306 (step S307), you can create a complaint in step S306, or accept a complaint filed with the court of competent jurisdiction, regardless of the step in which you create a complaint directly in step S307 ( Step S308). If the complaint is received in step S308 (step S309), the payment is completed (step S309), and the complaint is registered (step S310), and when the complaint is registered in step S310, the plaintiff is notified of the trial date (step S311).

If the trial date is notified at step S311, the plaintiff is present at the trial date (step S312), and the defendant is present (step S313). If the defendant is not present at step S313, the defendant is judged that the date has not been received. (Step S314). In step S314, if the defendant has not received the date, the disclosure service procedure is performed (step S315), and it is determined whether or not the defendant is present again after a predetermined time (step S316). If the defendant did not attend again in step S316, the trial ends with the plaintiff prevailing (step S317).

If the defendant is present at step S313, or if the disclosure service procedure is performed at step S315, or if the defendant is not present at step S316 again, the trial proceeds (step S318) to determine whether the plaintiff and the defendant's claim are in conflict (step S313). S319). If the plaintiff and the defendant's claim are not conflicted in the step S319, the defendant recognizes the plaintiff's claim and terminates the hearing (step S320), assigns a sentence date (step S321), and decides (step S322).

If the plaintiff and the defendant's claim are conflicted in step S319, it is determined whether or not to apply for a witness (step S323), and if the applicant applies for a witness in step S323, a witness application is prepared (step S324). When the witness application form is prepared in step S324, a witness newspaper matter is prepared and submitted (step S325), and a fee is paid in advance (step S326). In step S323, if the witness is not applied for or if the cost is paid in step S326, the applicant applies for the appraisal of the evidence (step S327).

If the appraisal of the evidence is requested in step S327, the trial proceeds (step S328). If the trial is terminated by the prevailing manuscript in step S317, or when the trial proceeds in step S328, the date of the sentence is designated (step S329). If the date of the sentence is designated in step S329, the sentence is pronounced (step S330), and it is determined whether to appeal (step S331). If it is not appealed in step S331, the judgment is confirmed (step S332), and if it is appealed in step S331, the appeal is performed (step S333).

6A to 6C are detailed flowcharts of a criminal simulation litigation process in the legal litigation service method shown in FIG.

6A to 6C, in order to perform the criminal mock litigation process, the legal consumer performs login (step S401). In step S401, if it is determined that the collectible is directly created when the login is performed (step S402), and if the collectible is directly created in step S402, the corresponding case is selected from the illustrated criminal case names (step S403). If the case is selected in step S403, it is determined whether or not to sue / complain to the police (step S404), and if it is sued / complained to the police in step S404, the investigation is started (step S405).

If it is not sued / complained to the police at step S404, it is sued / claimed at the prosecution service (step S406), and it is determined whether or not to investigate directly by the prosecution service (step S407). If it is not directly investigated by the prosecution at step S407, it is moved to the jurisdiction police station (step S408). If the prosecution judges to directly investigate in step S407, the prosecution investigates (step S409).

After performing step S405 or step S408, the police investigates (step S410), and it is determined whether or not the suspect's attendance is expected or the risk is expected (step S411). If the suspect's attendance is not accepted or the risk is expected in step S411, a warrant for arrest is requested to the prosecution service (step S412), and the warrant is requested for a arrest warrant from the prosecution service (step S413).

If the prosecution requests the arrest warrant in step S413, the judge judges whether the arrest warrant has been issued (step S414). If the judge issued the arrest warrant in step S414, the suspect is arrested (step S415), and the prosecution within 48 hours. Request a warrant of arrest to the court (step S416). If the judge did not issue an arrest warrant in step S414, it was determined that there was a risk of extinction and escape from the evidence (step S417). The investigation proceeds (step S418).

If in step S416 or S417 a claim for arrest is issued, the suspect is read before the arrest (step S419), the judge judges that the warrant has been issued (step S420), and if the judge has not issued a warrant for arrest in step S420, The arrest warrant is rejected (step S421), and the process returns to step S418 where the investigation is performed in the state of being deceased.

On the other hand, if the judge issued a warrant of arrest in step S420, the suspect is arrested (step S422), and it is determined whether or not to apply for a restraint application (step S423). If the redemption suit is applied in step S423, the court examines the redemption suit (step S424) to determine whether the court ordered the release (step S425). If it is determined in step S425 that the court has not ordered the release before the prosecution bail system (step S426), and in step S426, if the petition is applied for the prosecution bail system (step S427), the bail is granted (step S427). S428).

If you did not apply for the indictment bail system in step S426 (step S429), and sent to the prosecution (step S430), the prosecution starts the investigation and after a predetermined time, the investigation is extended (step S431), Prosecution is confirmed (step S432). After performing step S425 or step S428, the suspect is released (step S433). If the investigation proceeds in the crippled state in step S418 or the suspect is released in step S433, the police are sent to the prosecution after the police investigation on the crippled suspect (step S434). After performing step S432 or step S434, it is determined whether the prosecution has been prosecuted (step S435), and if the prosecution is prosecuted in step S435, it is determined whether to apply for jewelry (step S436).

If it is requested in step S436, the court determines whether the bail application is granted (step S437). If the bail application is authorized in step S437, the bail deposit is paid (step S438), and the bail is processed (step S439). If the applicant did not apply for bail at step S436, or the court did not approve bail at step S437, and the bail was processed at step S439, the trial proceeds (step S440) and a sentence is sent (step S441). If it is determined in step S441, it is determined whether to appeal (step S442), and if it is determined to appeal in step S442, the appeal is performed (step S443).

If the prosecution is not prosecuted in step S435 (step S444), the prosecution is determined in the prosecution (step S444). The trial is conducted only with the investigation record without the trial procedure (step S446), and a short order is issued (step S447). With respect to the judge's abbreviated order performed in step S447, it is determined whether or not the judge's abbreviated order is dismissed (step S448), and if it is dissatisfied with the abbreviated order in step S448, a formal trial is requested (step S449). If you do not appeal in step S442 or if you do not disagree with the abbreviated order in step S448, the sentence is executed (step S450).

As described above, in the detailed description of the present invention, specific embodiments have been described, but various modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the described embodiments, but should be defined by the claims below and equivalents thereof.

As a result, according to the lawsuit service apparatus and method using the Internet according to the present invention, the following advantages occur.

Encourage legal consumers to experience mock litigation on the Internet to get quality legal services, accurately predict the litigation process and ensure legally adequate defense to prevent unnecessary litigation, role-playing or general procedures It is necessary to conduct a mock lawsuit by conducting a mock lawsuit, etc., and to provide information on the precautions, the time required, and the cost of the lawsuit in the course of proceedings, such as civil lawsuits and criminal lawsuits, through documents by e-mail. You can explain the legal terms in the collection or search for them at any time. In addition, by making legal contracts for legal proceedings directly on the Internet, legal consumers directly reduce the burden on legal consumers involved in legal proceedings, and by providing e-mail support for each step of contract form preparation, Help you understand the lawsuit.

Claims (10)

A web server for processing data on a lawsuit selected by a legal consumer through a legal consumer computer connected to the Internet network; System management means for performing security management, disaster recovery / backup management, content management, various statistics management, etc. of the data processed in the web server; A database server for storing, updating, deleting, retrieving, managing tables, and data backup information of the data relating to the lawsuit processed by the web server; And And legal means for managing data input by a legal consumer and transmitting information on the lawsuit to a legal consumer through an e-mail. The method of claim 1 wherein the lawsuit is Legal litigation service device using the Internet, characterized in that the civil mock, criminal mock litigation. The method of claim 1, wherein the table Legal litigation service device using the Internet, characterized in that the table of the general contract form for the lawsuit. In a legal litigation service method for a legal consumer to conduct a simulated litigation procedure through an internet network, Civil simulated litigation process in which the legal consumer conducts a series of procedures for legally and forcibly resolving and coordinating conflicts of interests and disputes concerning life-life relationships between individuals, and prepares civil case documents and stores them in a database server. ; And Criminal simulation in which the consumer of the law performs a series of procedures for legally and forcibly resolving and coordinating conflicts of interests and disputes between criminals and prepares criminal case documents and stores them in the database server. Law litigation service method using the Internet, characterized in that it comprises a litigation process. The method of claim 4, wherein The lawsuit service method using the Internet further comprises the process of drafting a general contract in accordance with a procedure for the legal consumer to be reviewed by a legal expert and then sent back to the legal consumer via e-mail. The method of claim 5, wherein the contract writing process A lawsuit service method using the Internet comprising a civil mock case contract process and a criminal mock case contract process. 7. The process of claim 6 wherein the civil mock contract process A first step in which a legal consumer logs in, selects a civil case document type, selects a complaint form, inputs a case name, and enters personal information of the plaintiff / defendant; The second process of judging whether the personal information entered has the defendant's address, if the defendant's address is not provided, and if the defendant's address is provided, enter the purpose of the claim, the cause, and the method of verification. ; And If a legal complaint is decided by a legal expert for review, the legal expert includes a third step of e-mailing the review opinion to the legal consumer after reviewing the legal complaint. Litigation Services Method. 7. The process of claim 6 wherein the criminal simulation contract process The first step of selecting a criminal case document and a complaint form after the legal consumer logs in and searching for the case name; A second process of judging whether or not an example of the complaint is made, and if an example of the complaint is made, a complaint is prepared according to the example; A third step of entering the personal information of the complainant and the complainant after the complainant has been completed, and then entering the complainant's facts and supporting documents and the date of the complainant; And After selecting the competent police department / prosecutor's office and completing the complaint, the legal expert will review the complaint, and the legal expert will include a fourth process of e-mailing the review opinion to the legal consumer after reviewing the complaint. Used legal litigation service method. The method of claim 4, wherein the civil mock litigation process is In the civil mock litigation process, the law consumer selects the case from the illustrated civil case and decides whether to proceed with preservation procedures such as seizure / disposal. A first step of receiving input through a legal consumer computer connected to a web server through a network; The second process of judging whether or not to make a complaint in person, and if the complaint is to be prepared by hand, the complaint should be prepared by the court of competent jurisdiction; A third step of completing the registration, paying the license fee and the delivery fee when the complaint is received, and notifying the plaintiff of the trial date; A fourth process of presenting the plaintiff at the trial date and determining whether the defendant is present, and if the defendant is not present, determining whether the defendant has not been served; A fifth process of performing the disclosure service procedure if the defendant has not been served, and determining whether the defendant has not attended again, and terminating the trial with the plaintiff's prevailing action if the defendant did not attend; If the defendant is present at trial or if the disclosure service has been carried out, the trial proceeds. If the plaintiff and the defendant's claim are not in conflict, the judgment is decided after the conclusion of the hearing. The sixth process of doing; A seventh process of completing and submitting a witness application and prepaying the fee if you apply for a witness; An eighth process of filing an evaluation of the evidence and proceeding to trial if no witnesses have been filed or costs have been paid; And If the trial is terminated due to the prevailing manuscript, or if the trial proceeds after applying for an appraisal of the evidence, the legal process using the Internet includes the ninth process of specifying the sentence due date and confirming or appealing the judgment according to the appeal. Service method. The method of claim 4, wherein the criminal simulation proceedings are After logging in, the law consumer directly fills out the complaint and selects the case from the illustrated criminal case name, and if he / she decides to sue / complain to the police, he / she starts investigation and sue / proclaims to the prosecution office. The first process of conducting an investigation by a prosecution if it is to be investigated, or by investigating by a police officer if the investigation is not conducted directly by the prosecution; A second process of requesting a warrant for arrest by the prosecution after probing the suspect's non-compliance or risk of attendance, and then requesting the warrant for the arrest by the prosecution and determining whether the judge issued the arrest warrant; If the judge issued an arrest warrant, the suspect was arrested, and the prosecution filed a warrant for the arrest within a certain time, and if the judge did not issue an arrest warrant, the judge judged whether there was a risk of extinction and escaping the evidence, A third process of proceeding with the investigation in spite of the claim of arrest warrant without risk of destruction or escape; If the prosecution filed a warrant for arrest on the court, the newspaper examines the suspect before detention and determines whether the judge issued a warrant for arrest. process; A fifth process of determining whether the court ordered the release of the suspect by arresting the suspect if he or she issued a warrant of arrest and ordering the release by the court, and if the court did not order the release; If you have applied for bail before the bail, apply for bail after you apply for bail. If you do not apply for bail before, you can investigate the detained suspect and send it to the prosecution service. Sixth process; A seventh process of releasing when a court ordered release or permission to bail and sending it to the prosecution service after the police investigation in the state of release by bail or in the state of crippled state; An eighth step of determining whether the prosecution has been prosecuted or if the suspect is sent to the prosecution, whether the prosecution has been prosecuted by the prosecution; A ninth process of proceeding with the trial after the bail process and making a sentence, and determining whether to appeal according to the sentence; If the prosecution did not prosecute in the eighth process, the prosecution determined that the prosecution had been informed. A tenth process of making an order; And A method for legal proceedings using the Internet, comprising the eleventh process of judging whether or not to complain to a judge's short order, and if not, requesting a formal trial and executing a sentence.