KR19990019276A - Household Customer Evaluation System - Google Patents

Household Customer Evaluation System Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR19990019276A
KR19990019276A KR1019970042632A KR19970042632A KR19990019276A KR 19990019276 A KR19990019276 A KR 19990019276A KR 1019970042632 A KR1019970042632 A KR 1019970042632A KR 19970042632 A KR19970042632 A KR 19970042632A KR 19990019276 A KR19990019276 A KR 19990019276A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
household
customers
variables
loans
income
Prior art date
Application number
KR1019970042632A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
권익대
Original Assignee
이관우
주식회사 한일은행
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 이관우, 주식회사 한일은행 filed Critical 이관우
Priority to KR1019970042632A priority Critical patent/KR19990019276A/en
Publication of KR19990019276A publication Critical patent/KR19990019276A/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/03Credit; Loans; Processing thereof
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management

Abstract

본 발명은 축적된 은행 가계고객의 데이터(예컨대 나이, 소득수준, 주거상황, 거래실적등의 변수)를 종합적으로 분석하여 변수들에 대한 리스크를 측정하고 접수화하여 시스템화 함으로써 고객에게 신속한 융자가부 결정 및 합리적인 여신한도를 제공하는데 목적이 있다.The present invention comprehensively analyzes accumulated data of bank household customers (for example, variables such as age, income level, housing situation, and transaction performance) to measure and accept risks of variables and systemize them to provide fast loans to customers. The purpose is to provide a decision and reasonable credit limit.

이를 실현하기 위하여 본 발명은, 독립성검정을 이용하여 상기 변수들에 대한 리스크를 측정한 후 로짓분석에서 모수추정방법으로 최우추정법을 사용 변수별 점수를 산출하여 스코아카드를 작성하고, 이를 융자가부결정 기준과 점수별 소득별 여신한도 설정기준과 함께 전산시스템화 하여, 전산으로 가계고객에 대한 과학적·자동적 심사를 가능케 하고 있다.In order to realize this, the present invention uses the independence test to measure the risks for the variables, and then calculate scores for each variable using the maximum likelihood estimation method as a parameter estimation method in logit analysis, and create a scorecard, In addition to the decision criteria and credit limit setting criteria by income, the computerized system enables scientific and automatic screening of household customers.

시스템의 활용으로 불특정 다수를 대상으로 하는 소액의 대량 가계대출을 신속히 처리하여 고객만족을 극대화하고, 은행은 업무의 효율성을 제고함은 물론 우량고객과 불량고객을 선별할 수 있어 가계대출의 부실을 최소화 하는 효과를 얻을 수 있다.Maximize customer satisfaction by quickly processing small-scale large-scale household loans to unspecified people through the use of the system, and improve the efficiency of business, and banks can select good and bad customers, thereby reducing household loans. Minimize effect can be obtained.

Description

가계고객평가시스템(Scoring System)Household Customer Evaluation System

본 발명은 축적된 은행 가계고객의 데이터(예컨대 나이, 소득수준, 주거상황, 거래실적등의 변수)를 종합적으로 분석하여 변수들에 대한 리스크를 측정하고 점수화하여 고객에게 신속한 융자가부결정 및 합리적인 여신한도를 제공하는 전산시스템이다.The present invention comprehensively analyzes accumulated data of bank household customers (for example, variables such as age, income level, housing situation, transaction performance, etc.) to measure and score risks for variables to quickly determine loans and rationality to customers. It is a computer system that provides a credit limit.

이 분야의 종래기술은 은행 가계고객의 데이터(예컨대 나이, 소득수준, 주거상황, 거래실적등의 변수)를 종합적으로 분석하지 못하였기 때문에 리스크가 검증되지 않은 기준이나 대출담당자의 경험에 의한 심사가 이루어져 담당자의 업무적 능력이나 경험에 따라 여신가부결정과 대출실행이 결정되고, 소액의 대량대출이 이루어지는 가계대출의 특징상 많은 시간이 소요된다는 점이다.The prior art in this field has failed to comprehensively analyze the data of bank household customers (such as variables such as age, income level, housing conditions, and transaction performance), so that screening based on the risk-tested criteria or the experience of the loan officer is not possible. In this regard, loan determination and loan execution are decided according to the professional ability and experience of the person in charge, and it takes a lot of time because of the characteristics of household loans in which a small amount of large loans are made.

독립성검정기법을 이용하여 상기 변수들에 대한 리스크를 측정한 후 로짓분석에서 모수추정방법으로 최우추정법을 사용 변수별 점수를 산출하여 스코아카드를 작성하고, 이를 융자가부결정 기준과 점수별 소득별 여신한도 설정기준과 함께 전산시스템화 하여 전산으로 가계고객에 대한 과학적·자동적 심사를 가능케 하는데 있다.After measuring the risks of these variables using the independence test technique, the score analysis for each variable was used as a parameter estimation method in logit analysis to calculate scores for each variable. It is a computerized system with credit limit setting standards to enable scientific and automatic screening of household customers through computerization.

도 1은 가계고객평가시스템 흐름도.1 is a flow chart of household customer evaluation system.

도 2는 융자가부결정 흐름도.2 is a flow chart for determining loan.

도 1은 가계고객평가시스템 흐름도로서, 먼저 축적된 과거데이터(2)를 기반으로 나이, 주거상황, 혼인여부, 직업, 직위, 근무년수, 연간소득, 동반가족수, 신용카드 소지여부등에 대한 데이터분석(3)을 한다. 이때 사용되는 기법은 변수간의 상관여부를 알아보는 분석기법인 독립성검정이다. 예를들면 소극적 리스크가 서로 관련이 없다면 두변수는 독립이라는 곁론을 얻을 수 있고 소득은 리스크를 설명하는데 변수로 사용될 수 없다.1 is a flow chart of a household customer evaluation system, which is based on historical data (2) accumulated earlier, data on age, housing status, marital status, occupation, position, working years, annual income, number of accompanying family members, credit card possession, etc. Analyze (3). The technique used at this time is an independence test, an analysis method that checks correlation between variables. For example, if passive risks are not related to each other, the two variables can be argued for independence, and income cannot be used as a variable to describe risk.

만약 소득과 리스크가 서로 관련이 있다면 두변수는 종속이라는 결론을 얻을 수 있고 소득은 리스크를 설명하는데 변수로 사용될 수 있다.If income and risk are related to each other, one can conclude that two variables are dependent and income can be used as a variable to explain risk.

다음은 스코어카드 항목선정·배점(4)인데 변수로 사용할 수 있는 항목 중 리스크가 큰 항목을 선정하여 로짓분석에서 모수추정방법으로 최우추정법을 이용 각 변수에 가중치를 주어 배점을 산출한다.The following is the scorecard item selection and scoring (4). The items with high risk are selected from the items that can be used as variables, and the weight is calculated by weighting each variable using the maximum likelihood estimation method as the parameter estimation method in logit analysis.

이렇게하여 스코어카드작성(5)을 하고 점수별 월소득을 매치시켜 합리적인 여신한도설정(6)을 하게 된다. 즉, 점수가 더높은 우량고객과 같은 점수일지라도 월 소득이 더많은 고객에게는 더 많은 한도를 주고, 기준점수미만인 고객과 신용불량거래자에게는 여신을 제한하게 한다.In this way, the scorecard preparation (5) is made and the monthly income for each score is matched to establish a reasonable credit limit (6). In other words, even if the score is the same as the superior customer with higher score, the limit is more limited to the customer with higher monthly income, and the credit is limited to the customers and the creditors who are below the standard score.

동 스코어카드는 은행의 외부환경과 고객의 형태가 변화함에 따라 지속적으로 사용할 수 없어 신규데이터(1)가 축적되면 리스크 재분석을 통하여 약3년에서 5년 간격으로 업-데이트를 하게 된다.The scorecard cannot be continuously used as the bank's external environment and customer types change. When new data (1) is accumulated, the scorecard is updated every three to five years through risk reanalysis.

영업점사용자(7)은 고객의 융자요청시 고객으로부터 융자신청서와 확인서류를 징구받아 융자신청서의 모든 기재사항을 단말기에 입력거래하면, 전산부호스트(8)에서는 고객의 정보사항 중 나이, 직업, 소득, 동반가족수등 항목과 은행거래실적인 수신평잔, 급여이체, 자동이체, 신용카드 소지여부등 항목을 자동 점수화하는 시스템운영(9)이 작동되어 스코어카드출력(10)이 이루어지며 마지막으로 융자가부결정(11)이 이루어지는데 이것에 대해서는 도 2에서 구체적으로 설명한다.When the branch user (7) receives a loan application form and confirmation document from the customer upon request of the customer's loan, and inputs all the details of the loan application into the terminal, the computerized host (8) requests the age, occupation, and income among the customer's information items. The system operation (9) automatically scores the items such as the number of family members, and the items such as the banking record, the receiving balance, payroll, direct debit, and the presence of a credit card. The scorecard output (10) is performed. The provisional determination 11 is performed and this is demonstrated concretely in FIG.

도 2는 융자가부결정흐름도로서, 창구직원이 고객으로부터 징구받은 융자신청서의 기재사항을 단말기(1)에 입력하여 출력된 스코어카드(2)와 은행연합회등과 연계된 불량거래자정보(3)를 이용하여 전산으로 융자가부결정을 하게된다.Fig. 2 is a loan deciding flow chart, in which the counter clerk inputs the details of the loan application collected from the customer to the terminal 1 and outputs the scorecard 2 and the bad trader information linked to the bank association. The loan is decided by computerization.

전산가부결정(4)은 기준점미만 점수자 및 현재 신용정보불량자 등은 자동부결(5)되고 기준점수이상자는 자동승인(6)되어 부결통지(11) 또는 승인통지(12)하게 된다.In the computerized decision (4), the scorer who scores below the reference point and the current credit information defector etc. are automatically rejected (5), and those who are higher than the standard score are automatically approved (6) and the notification of rejection (11) or approval notification (12).

또한 전산으로 가부결정이 곤란한 사항은 검토(7) 과정을 거치는데 기준점미만이지만 보증인을 입보하는 등 대출신청승인고려(8) 사항이 있으면 해당여신 전결권자의 최종검토(10)를 거쳐 부결통지(11) 또는 승인통지(12)를 하고, 고려한 사항이 없으면 최종검토(10) 과정을 거치지 않고 직접 부결통지(11) 한다.In addition, the matters in which it is difficult to decide whether or not to make a decision by computer are subject to review (7) but it is less than the standard point. 11) or the approval notice 12, and if there is no consideration, the direct notification (11) without going through the final review (10) process.

기준점이상이지만 과거 신용정보불량자등 대출신청부결고려(9) 사항이 있으면 해당여신 전결권자의 최종검토(10)를 거쳐 부결통지(11) 또는 승인통지(12)를 하고, 고려사항이 있으면 최종검토(10) 과정을 거치지 않고 직접승인통지(12) 한다.If there is any consideration of loan application refusal (9) such as bad credit information in the past, it is passed through the final review (10) of the creditor's predecessor (10). (10) Direct approval notification (12) without going through the process.

Claims (2)

축적된 고객의 과거 데이터를 분석하여 스코어카드를 만드는 기법A technique for creating scorecards by analyzing accumulated customer historical data 스코어카드, 여신가부결정시스템, 점수별 월소득과 매치된 여신한도를 연계하여 과학적·자동적으로 심사하는 시스템Scientific and automatic screening system by linking credit card matched with score card, credit decision system and monthly income by score
KR1019970042632A 1997-08-29 1997-08-29 Household Customer Evaluation System KR19990019276A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1019970042632A KR19990019276A (en) 1997-08-29 1997-08-29 Household Customer Evaluation System

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1019970042632A KR19990019276A (en) 1997-08-29 1997-08-29 Household Customer Evaluation System

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR19990019276A true KR19990019276A (en) 1999-03-15

Family

ID=66038397

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1019970042632A KR19990019276A (en) 1997-08-29 1997-08-29 Household Customer Evaluation System

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR19990019276A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7818254B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2010-10-19 Juno Holdings, N.V. Application apparatus and method

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7818254B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2010-10-19 Juno Holdings, N.V. Application apparatus and method
USRE44626E1 (en) 1999-04-07 2013-12-03 Juno Holdings S.A.R.L. Application apparatus and method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jagtiani et al. The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform
Wakamori et al. Why do shoppers use cash? Evidence from shopping diary data
Matthews et al. Competitive conditions among the major British banks
CN106875078B (en) Transaction risk detection method, device and equipment
Chye et al. Credit scoring using data mining techniques
Khalifaturofi'ah Cost efficiency, innovation and financial performance of banks in Indonesia
CN109816519A (en) A kind of recognition methods of fraud clique, device and equipment
US20110166987A1 (en) Evaluating Loan Access Using Online Business Transaction Data
WO2011139889A2 (en) System and method for collections on delinquent financial accounts
KR102246782B1 (en) System for Debt Repayment Capability Evaluation Of Corporation Including Evaluation Model Based On AI Using Commerce Data
Kulkarni et al. Advanced credit score calculation using social media and machine learning
Yousaf et al. Tail connectedness between lending/borrowing tokens and commercial bank stocks
US20120072334A1 (en) Responsibility analytics
CN107563885A (en) A kind of arbitrage recognition methods and device
Panza et al. Hidden in plain sight: Correspondent banking in the 1930s
Balyuk et al. Friends and family money: P2p transfers and financially fragile consumers
Adem Determinants of credit risk in Ethiopian banking industry: Does political stability matter?
US11935073B1 (en) System and methods for general ledger flagging
KR19990019276A (en) Household Customer Evaluation System
CN112950290A (en) Mining method and device for economic dependence clients, storage medium and electronic equipment
Vasconcelos et al. A neural network based solution for the credit risk assessment problem
CN110941652A (en) Analysis method of bank flow data
CN116882998B (en) Virtual currency fund analysis method
CN111563747B (en) Processing method and device for merchant credit
Mushtaq et al. Income Smoothing and Islam: Evidence from Pakistan Shari'ah Compliant Companies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E601 Decision to refuse application