KR102609081B1 - Smart Broabcasting System - Google Patents

Abstract

The embodiment relates to a smart broadcasting system.
Specifically, this smart broadcasting system quickly checks for malfunctions in speakers at various sites and efficiently diagnoses the type of malfunction through the broadcasting information processing device in the broadcasting room.
In addition, if the speaker of the broadcasting device breaks down in a disaster situation, the system quickly and reliably handles the breakdown by interacting with nearby field managers through a specific internal emergency response manual.
These manuals have action scenarios to respond to various types of speaker failures, and actions are taken dynamically by interacting with nearby managers according to these scenarios. In addition, it interacts with the speaker's surrounding environment information and used parts to change the scenario in advance to suit the situation, dynamically providing emergency measures according to the field situation.
The above interaction means that the speaker's emergency handling is guided by TTS for each procedure based on a scenario, and the operation of recognizing the user's emergency handling matters by STT is repeatedly performed and processed.

Description

Smart Broadcasting System

The content disclosed in this specification relates to a technology in which a broadcasting information processing device in a broadcasting room at a school or building diagnoses and processes the failure of speakers at various sites and broadcasts.

Unless otherwise indicated herein, the material described in this section is not prior art to the claims of this application, and is not admitted to be prior art by inclusion in this section.

In general, schools and buildings of a certain size or larger are equipped with a public address system to enable various broadcasts, and if necessary, emergency broadcasts can be made in emergency situations.

It is mainly equipped with a broadcasting information processing device in the broadcasting room and speakers individually installed in each specific location. For example, in schools, speakers are installed for each grade or class and connected to the broadcasting information processing device in the broadcasting room.

The broadcasting information processing device in the broadcasting room can simultaneously broadcast broadcasts through each speaker or select only a portion of the broadcasts. In particular, when a disaster or calamity occurs, existing broadcasts can be stopped and emergency broadcasts can be quickly sent out.

However, in most cases, when no sound is transmitted from the speaker, the manager is embarrassed and requests after-sales service. However, it is not a simple announcement, and if a disaster or disaster is broadcasted, it must be handled as an emergency, and managers may become nervous and embarrassed.

These prior technologies are as follows.

Document 1 Korean Patent No. 10-1349078 Document 2 Korean Patent No. 10-2104101 Document 3 Korean Patent No. 10-1633681 Document 4 Korean Patent No. 10-1349078

The disclosed content first seeks to provide a smart broadcasting system that can quickly check whether speakers at various sites are broken and efficiently diagnose the type of malfunction through a broadcasting information processing device in a broadcasting room.

In addition, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or other disaster, the broadcasting information processing device attempts to quickly and reliably perform emergency processing in conjunction with nearby managers.

The smart broadcasting system according to the embodiment is,

First, as before, it includes a broadcast information processing device in a broadcast room and a speaker that receives broadcast signals from the broadcast information processing device at each site and outputs them as audio signals.

In this state, depending on the embodiment, a specific failure detection module is individually installed for each speaker. The failure detection module compares the size of the broadcast signal sent from the broadcast information processing device and the size of the actual voice signal output through the speaker, and if there is a difference, sends an alarm signal notifying the broadcast information processing device of a malfunction of the speaker. Transmit.

Then, the broadcast information processing device is characterized in that it initiates and processes a malfunction diagnosis of the speaker based on a manual for diagnosing malfunctions for each speaker malfunction type in response to this alarm signal.

In addition, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or calamity, emergency handling is performed quickly and reliably by interacting with a nearby manager in a specific manual of the broadcasting information processing device.

These manuals have action scenarios to respond to various types of speaker failures, and actions are taken dynamically by interacting with nearby managers according to these scenarios. In addition, it interacts with the speaker's surrounding environment information and used parts to change the scenario in advance to suit the situation, dynamically providing emergency measures according to the field situation.

The above interaction means that the speaker's emergency handling is guided by TTS for each procedure based on a scenario, and the operation of recognizing the user's emergency handling matters by STT is repeatedly performed and processed.

According to embodiments, failure of speakers in various fields is quickly confirmed and the type of failure is efficiently diagnosed through a broadcasting information processing device in a broadcasting room.

In addition, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or disaster, the broadcasting information processing device quickly and reliably performs emergency processing in conjunction with a nearby manager.

1 is a diagram conceptually explaining a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.
Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating an emergency processing process applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment
Figure 3 is a diagram for explaining emergency processing operations applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment
Figure 4 is a diagram showing a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.
Figure 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a broadcasting information processing device applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.
Figure 6 is a procedural flowchart sequentially showing the operation of a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

1 is a diagram conceptually explaining a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 1, the system of one embodiment first broadcasts simultaneously or individually through speakers in specific places according to the administrator's settings in a broadcasting information processing device in a broadcasting room in various places such as schools or buildings as before. Perform.

In this state, one embodiment quickly checks whether each speaker is broken individually and efficiently diagnoses the type of trouble through the broadcast information processing device.

For this purpose, a specific fault detection module is installed in each speaker. The failure detection module compares the size of the broadcast signal sent from the broadcast information processing device and the size of the actual voice signal output through the speaker, and if there is a difference, sends an alarm signal notifying the broadcast information processing device of a malfunction of the speaker. do.

When the size of the broadcast signal corresponds to the size of a preset disaster broadcast signal or disaster broadcast signal, that is, when a disaster or calamity occurs, a second alarm signal that is higher than the intensity of the alarm signal by a set value can be transmitted. The set value may be determined proportionally by considering the size of the corresponding broadcast signal depending on the degree of emergency, such as a disaster or calamity.

Then, in response to this alarm signal, the broadcasting information processing device initiates and processes a fault diagnosis of the speaker based on a manual for fault diagnosis for each speaker fault type.

Therefore, in one embodiment, the failure type of a plurality of speakers in various locations is individually and quickly confirmed and the failure type is efficiently diagnosed through the broadcast information processing device.

For example, when a fire occurs, the broadcasting information processing device outputs a fire broadcasting signal, and the speaker notifies people at the scene of this through a voice signal.

The failure detection module compares the size of the fire broadcast signal and the sound signal and, if there is a difference, transmits a second alarm signal notifying that there is a failure in the corresponding speaker to the broadcast information processing device.

Then, according to the second alarm signal, the broadcast information processing device initiates a fault diagnosis of the speaker based on the manual, determines the type of fault, and processes it.

For example, if the voltage and current of the voice coil are normal and no sound comes out of the speaker, the malfunction can be diagnosed and inspected due to a stuck voice coil or a defective horn speaker.

On the other hand, when a voice comes out of a speaker, if there is a difference of more than 50% between the volume of the voice signal and the volume of the corresponding broadcast signal, inspection is requested due to a problem with the horn speaker. And, if it is over 80%, it is diagnosed as normal.

As another example, the broadcasting information processing device repeatedly outputs a test broadcast signal to the failure detection module every time a set period elapses, so that the manager can directly determine whether the speaker is broken depending on the presence or absence of an alarm signal from the failure detection module. You can check it.

Alternatively, the test broadcast signal can be generated and output manually by manipulating the administrator key.

The setting cycle is determined differently depending on the frequency of use, performance, use location, etc. of the speaker according to the administrator's setting information, and the test broadcast signal can be set to be relatively lower in size and information amount than the general broadcast signal or set to be the same.

Meanwhile, when the broadcast information processing device receives the second alarm signal, it can urgently inform the manager of information indicating that a disaster or calamity has occurred through the registration manager terminal or display medium. The display medium may be an electronic signboard.

In such an emergency situation, if a speaker breaks down, emergency treatment must be handled quickly, and managers may become nervous and embarrassed.

Accordingly, in another embodiment, under this situation, emergency handling is quickly and reliably performed by interacting with a nearby administrator in a specific manual of the broadcast information processing device.

In other words, if a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or disaster, emergency handling is performed quickly and reliably in conjunction with nearby managers.

These manuals have action scenarios to respond to various types of speaker failures, and actions are taken dynamically by interacting with nearby managers according to these scenarios. In addition, it interacts with the speaker's surrounding environment information and used parts to change the scenario in advance to suit the situation, dynamically providing emergency measures according to the field situation.

The above interaction means that the speaker's emergency handling is guided by TTS for each procedure based on a scenario, and the operation of recognizing the user's emergency handling matters by STT is repeatedly performed and processed.

Through this, in another embodiment, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or disaster, the information processing device in the broadcasting room performs emergency processing quickly and stably in conjunction with a nearby manager.

More specifically, the manual first collects usage environment status information by interacting with current surrounding usage environment sensors in a general situation, and then interacts with usage parts to collect identification or operation information of the corresponding parts. Alternatively, you can interact with the user via voice or text to collect the relevant administrator information to perform emergency processing. So, with this information, the scenario in the manual is changed to suit the current surrounding environment and parts.

For example, the current surrounding temperature, noise, vibration status, and device identification or number information such as the current voice coil and horn speaker are collected, and the scenario setting standard value or component information is varied.

Therefore, when the above-mentioned situation occurs, emergency handling is performed reliably by quickly interacting with the relevant manager based on this scenario.

For example, the scenario is converted into TTS for each emergency handling procedure and output through a speaker to a nearby manager, and is performed in order by interacting with the manager's emergency handling actions.

When outputting the scenario, the scenario can be converted into text and displayed through a nearby administrator terminal or a specific display medium. In this case, interaction with the user can be performed through voice or text input by the user.

As described above, one embodiment quickly checks whether speakers at various sites are broken and efficiently diagnoses the type of trouble through the broadcast information processing device in the broadcast room.

In addition, if the speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation such as a disaster or calamity, emergency handling is performed quickly and reliably in conjunction with nearby managers.

Figure 2 is a diagram for explaining an emergency handling process applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in Figure 2, the emergency handling process of one embodiment is as described above. First, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation, emergency handling is performed quickly and reliably by interacting with a scenario in the manual to a nearby manager.

For example, a case in which a horn speaker was diagnosed as malfunctioning is described.

First, the action scenario is as follows, for example.

1) When an alarm signal or a second alarm signal is received from the failure diagnosis module, a speaker failure is notified.

2) If no sound comes out of the speaker, check the voltage and current of the voice coil and if normal, request a voice coil inspection.

3) Notification of horn speaker failure if normal according to the above voice coil inspection

4) When voice comes out of the speaker, if there is a difference of more than 50% between the volume of the voice signal and the volume of the broadcast signal, request inspection of the horn speaker.

In this situation, the first procedure in the manual, '1) Speaker failure notification', is converted into voice and delivered to a nearby manager. The administrator confirms this, inputs the 'alarm reception' information by voice, converts it into text, and replies in the manual.

If the voice does not come out of the speaker using the following procedure, convert the '2) Voice coil inspection request' information into voice and deliver it to the administrator. The manager performs an inspection, inputs the 'voice coil normal' information by voice, converts it into text, and sends a reply.

Next, the '3) Horn speaker defect notification' information is output again, and once the processing result is received, emergency processing for the corresponding failure type is completed.

On the other hand, if the voice comes out of the speaker, the '4) Horn speaker inspection request' information is forwarded to the administrator and a reply is received to complete the process.

Additionally, the user can check by interacting with the manual whether it is normal to exceed 50% and around 80%.

Figure 3 is a diagram for explaining emergency processing operations applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 3, the emergency handling operation according to one embodiment first registers a manual based on the speaker's usage environment and usage parts or user interaction scenarios for each speaker failure type.

In this state, the scenario is varied according to the current surrounding environment and device by setting various setting values or device information of the scenario by interacting with the surrounding usage environment information and usage parts of the speaker to be handled according to the registered manual. Alternatively, you can interact with the user to appropriately set an administrator to handle emergency handling according to the above scenario.

Accordingly, if a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation, the manual provides a scenario interaction to nearby managers to quickly and reliably handle the emergency.

The specific operations are as follows.

First, the usage environment information is collected by interacting with various sensors in the manual. In addition, the used parts information and the user information are input as text through a key signal input unit according to the user's key operation in the manual, or as voice input through the microphone and STT unit according to the user's voice.

For example, the current use environment information includes temperature and humidity, vibration, noise, and geomagnetic information, and the use part information includes device identification information and operation settings such as the currently used voice coil and horn speaker.

Therefore, the scenario of the emergency response manual is varied by setting various setting values, device information, administrator information, etc. of the scenario according to the current usage environment, used parts, or user information.

For example, in the case of the horn speaker emergency treatment described above, if the usage environment is relatively high in vibration or noise, 50% in 4) above can be converted to '50%+k'. Alternatively, if the part used is a specific horn speaker, the horn speaker can be converted to the corresponding device in steps 3) and 4) above, and each can be set to the number of units used.

Through this, in one embodiment, when a speaker is diagnosed as broken in an emergency situation, the emergency is handled quickly and reliably by interacting with a scenario in the manual to a nearby manager.

As another example, unlike changing the scenario by interacting with the above-described usage environment and usage components, the corresponding settings or device information are changed by directly interacting with the user.

In this setting operation, each emergency handling procedure for the scenario is converted into voice in order and output to the user, and the user inputs specific settings or device information according to the current environment and parts by voice and converts them into text.

For example, the user can voice input 50% of 4) mentioned above as '50%+k' or voice input 3) 4) through a specific horn speaker (one unit).

In another embodiment, a failure level is assigned according to the degree of emergency for each speaker failure type, and the action type, action method, or action device for the scenario varies for each failure level. The manual for the above fault diagnosis is also the same.

For example, the failure type is classified into horn speaker failure, voice coil, etc., and the failure grade is assigned to grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 in that order. In addition, the action format of the action scenario is divided into voice and text, the action method varies the voice output size and the color and thickness of the text, and the action device is one or more of speakers, electronic signs, and administrator terminals depending on the fault level. Alert with

In the case of a horn speaker failure, it is a level 1 dangerous situation, so voice and text messages are provided to both the on-site manager and the remote main manager. In the case of voice, it is output through a speaker at a relatively high sound, and in the case of text, it is displayed in bold red through the electronic signboard or administrator terminal.

On the other hand, for relatively simple devices, only text messages are provided to the remote main administrator. In this case, the text can be displayed through the administrator terminal in black and normal thickness.

Therefore, in one embodiment, the action scenario is provided by varying the action type, action method, and action device according to the failure level, so that the failure situation is handled more dynamically.

Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 4, the system of one embodiment includes a broadcast information processing device 100 in a broadcasting room, speakers 200 individually installed in various places, a fault detection module 300 installed in each speaker 200, It includes a remote management information processing device 400.

The broadcasting information processing device 100 is installed in broadcasting rooms in various places such as schools and buildings, and transmits broadcasting signals through corresponding speakers for each location where the administrator wants to broadcast, and broadcasts simultaneously or individually.

The speaker 200 is installed in various places within a school or building, and outputs a broadcast signal as a voice signal under the control of the broadcast information processing device 100.

The fault detection module 300 is installed in each speaker 200. The failure detection module 300 compares the size of the broadcast signal of the broadcast information processing device 100 with the size of the voice signal actually output from the speaker 200, and if there is a difference, it sends the corresponding speaker to the broadcast information processing device 100. An alarm signal is sent to notify of a malfunction. The broadcast information processing device 100 performs a fault diagnosis of the corresponding speaker based on the above-mentioned manual in response to this alarm signal.

The management information processing device 400 receives the failure diagnosis results of each speaker 200 from a remote location through the broadcasting information processing device 100 and provides them to the manager, or checks and manages usage status information for each device.

Figure 5 is a block diagram showing the configuration of a broadcasting information processing device applied to a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 5, the broadcast information processing device 100 of one embodiment includes a key signal input unit 101, a first sensor unit 102, a second sensor unit 103, a storage unit 104, and a TTS unit. (105), a signal processing unit 106, a voice output unit 107, a text output unit 108, an interface unit 109, an MIC unit 110, an STT unit 111, and a control unit 112.

The key signal input unit 101 receives broadcast information and speaker device information according to the user's key operation. In addition, setting information such as functions and standard values of various devices for diagnosing and processing speaker failures and device registration information are input.

The first sensor unit 102 detects information about the surrounding environment of the speaker. The first sensor unit 102 includes a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, a vibration sensor, a noise sensor, and a magnetic field sensor.

The second sensor unit 103 detects driving state information of the speaker. The second sensor unit 103 may include a voltage sensor and a current sensor of a voice coil or a sound pressure sensor of a horn speaker.

The storage unit 104 is controlled by the control unit 112 and includes a failure diagnosis manual and an emergency handling manual according to an embodiment.

The TTS unit 105 converts the above action scenario into voice under the control of the control unit 112.

The signal processing unit 106 includes an A/D converter or a D/A converter, and processes and converts broadcast, voice, or text information according to the specifications and format of the corresponding device.

The voice output unit 107 outputs the voice converted by the TTS unit 105 under the control of the control unit 112 by varying it according to the action format and action method for each fault level.

The text output unit 108 outputs the above-mentioned action scenario in text format to the electronic signboard or administrator terminal. The electronic signboard indicates a malfunction of the speaker and displays the latest related information.

The interface unit 109 outputs a broadcast signal to the speaker 200, receives an alarm signal from the fault detection module 300, and transmits a fault diagnosis or emergency response result to the registration management information processing device 300. .

The MIC unit 110 receives the voice of an external user.

The STT unit 111 converts the user's voice into text.

The control unit 112 controls each of the units 101 to 111 to process or diagnose a failure situation using the failure diagnosis manual and the emergency handling manual and take emergency measures for each failure level.

Figure 6 is a flow chart sequentially showing the operation of a smart broadcasting system according to an embodiment.

As shown in FIG. 6, the smart broadcasting system according to one embodiment first includes a broadcast information processing device 100 as before and a speaker (which receives a broadcast signal from the broadcast information processing device 100 and outputs it as a voice signal). 200).

According to one embodiment, the failure detection module 300 is installed in the speaker 200.

In this state, the failure detection module 300 compares the size of the broadcast signal of the broadcast information processing device 100 with the size of the audio signal of the speaker 200.

As a result of the comparison, if the sizes of the two signals differ by the set difference value, an alarm signal notifying the failure of the corresponding speaker is transmitted to the broadcast information processing device 100. The difference value can be determined differently depending on the type of broadcast signal, for example, whether it is a test broadcast signal, a general broadcast signal, or a disaster and disaster broadcast signal.

In addition, when the size of the broadcast signal corresponds to the size of a preset disaster or disaster broadcast signal, that is, when a disaster or disaster occurs, a second alarm signal that is higher than the intensity of the alarm signal by a set value can be transmitted.

Then, the broadcast information processing device initiates and processes a malfunction diagnosis of the speaker based on a manual for diagnosing malfunctions for each speaker malfunction type according to the alarm signal transmitted from the malfunction detection module.

As described above, one embodiment quickly checks whether speakers at various sites are broken and efficiently diagnoses the type of trouble through the broadcast information processing device in the broadcast room.

100: Broadcast information processing device
101: key signal input unit 102: first sensor unit
103: second sensor unit 104: storage unit
105: TTS unit 106: Signal processing unit
107: audio output unit 108: text output unit
109: interface unit 110: MIC unit
111: STT unit 112: Control unit
200: speaker
300: Failure detection module

Claims (5)

Broadcast information processing device; In a broadcasting system including a speaker that receives a broadcast signal from the broadcast information processing device and outputs it as an audio signal,
It is installed in the speaker, and if there is a difference between the sizes of the broadcast signal and the voice signal, an alarm signal is transmitted to the broadcast information processing device to notify of a failure of the speaker, and a disaster broadcast in which the size of the broadcast signal is preset is provided. It includes a fault detection module that transmits a second alarm signal that is higher than the intensity of the alarm signal by a set value when it corresponds to the size of a signal or disaster broadcast signal,
The broadcast information processing device is
A first step of initiating and processing a malfunction diagnosis operation for the speaker based on a manual for diagnosing malfunctions for each speaker malfunction type according to the alarm signal sent by the malfunction detection module;
A second step of repeatedly outputting a test broadcast signal to the failure detection module every time a set period elapses to check whether the speaker is broken according to the presence or absence of an alarm signal from the failure detection module;
A third step of registering a manual for each speaker failure type by repeatedly performing the operation of providing TTS guidance for each procedure based on the scenario for emergency handling of the speaker and recognizing the user's emergency handling items as STT;
A fourth step of extracting a manual for the corresponding speaker failure type each time a failure diagnosis of the corresponding speaker is processed according to the second alarm signal, based on the manual registered in the third step; and
A smart broadcasting system comprising a fifth step of performing emergency treatment according to the manual extracted in the fourth step. delete delete delete In claim 1,
The broadcast information processing device is
In the first step, the current environment information and current part information of the speaker that will use the manual are collected, and the scenario of the manual is varied according to the speaker's current environment information and current part information. Smart broadcasting characterized in that system.

Images