KR102356115B1 - Method and apparatus for recommending a position based on user propensity for human resource management - Google Patents

Abstract

An embodiment of the present invention provides a method for recommending a job title based on a user propensity, performed by a server, comprising the steps of: obtaining California psychological inventory (CPI) test result information including a first score of a user with respect to each of a plurality of CPI individual items from a user terminal; determining whether the user is compatible as a general member of a company based on a first compatible score range and the first score with respect to each of the plurality of CPI individual items for the general member of the company which are preset; if the user is determined to be compatible as the general member of the company, extracting a first job title among a plurality of job titles based on a second compatible score range and the first score with respect to each of the plurality of CPI individual items for each of the plurality of job titles in the company; and providing the first job title as a recommended job title for the user to the user terminal. The present invention can effectively manage human resources.

Description

Method and device for recommending positions based on user propensity for human resource management

The present invention relates to a position recommendation method and apparatus based on a user's propensity for human resource management, and more particularly, to a user's CPI (California Psychological Inventory) test result, FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result And to a method and apparatus for recommending at least one position within a company to a user based on at least one of a Myers-Briggs-Type Indicator (MBTI) test result.

In general, a company is a group that performs work, and efficient work performance is the most important task. Various factors may be required to perform these tasks, but with the development of modern society, the most important factor is recognized as human resources.

Therefore, in recent years, in order to increase the efficiency of work, it is important to put the necessary manpower in the right place and to utilize the competent human resources above all else. However, if you look at the actual situation of normal companies, the human resources within the organization do not know about the work that is happening within the organization other than their own work, and in most cases, they cannot know the information about the human resources who perform the work. In such a situation, it is impossible to efficiently perform work and manage human resources, and there is a problem in that the work ability of the company cannot be effectively exhibited.

An object of the present invention for solving the above problems is to provide a position recommendation method based on a user's propensity for human resource management.

Another object of the present invention for solving the above problems is to provide a position recommendation device based on user propensity for human resource management.

Another object of the present invention for solving the above problems is to provide a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for executing a position recommendation method based on a user's propensity for human resource management.

An embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above object is a method for recommending a position based on a user's propensity performed by a server, the CPI ( California Psychological Inventory) test result information; determining whether the user is suitable as a member; if it is determined that the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise, a second suitability score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items for each of a plurality of positions within the enterprise; It may include deriving a first position among the plurality of positions based on a first score and providing the first position to the user terminal as a recommended position of the user.

Here, when it is determined that the user is not suitable as a general member of the company, the first score among the plurality of CPI individual items falls short of at least one CPI individual item that is not included in the first suitable score range. The method may further include deriving an item and providing information on improvement plan for the under-CPI item to the user terminal.

Here, the step of obtaining FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result information including the user's second score for each of the plurality of FIRO-B individual items from the user terminal, the plurality of FIRO-Bs obtaining a third score of another user of the second position for each of the individual items; calculating a mutual reconciliation score based on the second score and the third score; and the user based on the mutual reconciliation score and deriving information on the possibility of a relationship conflict between the other users and providing the information to the user terminal, wherein the second position is a position primarily connected to the first position on a preset position relationship diagram within the company can indicate

Here, when the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict includes information that the possibility of the relationship conflict is high, obtaining the first feedback information of the user corresponding to the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict from the user terminal Further comprising, the step of providing the first position to the user terminal as the recommended position of the user may include determining the first position as the recommended position based on the first feedback information.

Here, the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict is determined based on information about a specific mutual harmony score range in which the mutual harmony score is included among a plurality of preset mutual harmony score ranges, and the plurality of FIRO-B individual items These include a affiliation expression item, a affiliation expectation item, a control expression item, a control expectation item, a testis expression item, and an emotion expectation item, and the reciprocity score is the first reciprocity score for the belonging desire item and the first reciprocity score for the control desire item. 2 including a reciprocity score and a third reciprocity score for the emotional desire item, wherein the first reciprocity score is a first between the score of the affiliation expression item among the second scores and the score of the belonging expectation item among the third scores The difference and the second difference between the score of the expected belonging item among the second scores and the score of the belonging expression item of the third score is calculated as the sum of the difference, and the second mutual harmony score is the score of the control expression item among the second scores and a third difference between the scores of the control expectation items among the third scores and the fourth difference between the scores of the control expectation items among the second scores and the scores of the control expression items among the third scores, wherein the third The mutual harmony score is the fifth difference between the score of the emotion expression item of the second score and the score of the emotion expectation item of the third score, the score of the emotion expectation item of the second score, and the emotion expression item of the third score It can be calculated as the sum of the sixth difference between the scores.

Here, the steps of obtaining information about the first type of the user from among the plurality of MBTI types from the user terminal, obtaining information about the second type of the other user from among the plurality of MBTI types, and the second type The method may further include deriving information on the possibility of a task conflict between the user and the other user based on the first type and the second type and providing the information to the user terminal.

Here, when the information on the possibility of the task conflict includes information indicating that the possibility of the task conflict is high, obtaining second feedback information of the user corresponding to the information on the possibility of the task conflict from the user terminal Further comprising, the step of providing the first position to the user terminal as the recommended position of the user may include determining the first position as the recommended position based on the second feedback information.

Here, the information about the possibility of the task conflict may be determined based on the degree of harmony between the first type and the second type derived according to table information on the degree of harmony between the preset MBTI types.

An embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above other object is a server for performing a position recommendation method based on a user's disposition, including a processor and a memory for storing at least one instruction executed by the processor, wherein the at least One command is executed to obtain, from the user terminal, California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test result information including the user's first score for each of the plurality of CPI individual items, the plurality of preset general members of the company is executed to determine whether the user is suitable as a general member of the company based on the first score range and the first score for each of the CPI individual items, and when it is determined that the user is suitable as a general member of the company , derive a first position of the plurality of positions based on the first score and a second fit score range for each of the plurality of CPI line items for each of the plurality of positions within the enterprise; It may be executed to provide the first position to the user terminal as the recommended position of the user.

An embodiment of the present invention for achieving the above another object is a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for executing a position recommendation method based on a user's disposition, wherein the method for recommending a position based on the user's disposition is performed from a user terminal. Acquiring CPI (California Psychological Inventory) test result information including the user's first score for each of the plurality of CPI individual items; 1 determining whether the user is suitable as a general member of the company based on 1 suitability score range and the first score; deriving a first position among the plurality of positions based on a second suitable score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items and the first score, and the first position as a recommended position of the user It may include providing to the user terminal.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide effective human resource management by determining whether a user is suitable for a specific position based on 27 items according to the results of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test.

According to the present invention, the possibility of relationship conflict can be predicted by determining the mutual harmony between the two parties involved between the positions based on belonging, control, and emotion items according to the FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result, We can suggest a suitable solution for this.

According to the present invention, it is possible to predict the possibility of a task conflict by judging the temperament harmony between the two parties involved in the position based on the type information according to the MBTI (Myers-Briggs-Type Indicator) test result, and to present an appropriate solution. can

1 is a diagram illustrating terminals performing a position recommendation method based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a block diagram of a server that performs a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a diagram for explaining a first embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.
FIG. 4 is a view for explaining a plurality of items included in a result of a California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test of FIG. 3 .
FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #1 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 3 .
FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #2 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 3 .
FIG. 7 is a view for explaining a relationship diagram between positions of a chairperson corresponding to A1 of FIG. 3 .
FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions other than the chairperson corresponding to B1 of FIG. 3 .
9 is a diagram for explaining a second embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.
FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions of the chairperson corresponding to A2 of FIG. 9 and mutual harmony according to the relationship.
11 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions other than the chairperson corresponding to B2 of FIG. 9 and mutual harmony according to the relationship.
12 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #3 of the consulting and education treatment of FIG. 10 or 11 .
13 is a diagram for describing a plurality of items included in a result of a Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B) test of FIG. 9 .
14 is a diagram for explaining a mutual harmony score for each desire based on a plurality of items of FIG. 13 .
15 is a diagram for explaining a third embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.
FIG. 16 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the positions of the chairperson corresponding to A3 of FIG. 15 and the mutual harmony/temperament harmony according to the relationship.
FIG. 17 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions other than the presidency corresponding to B3 of FIG. 15 and mutual harmony/temperament harmony according to the relationship.
FIG. 18 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #4 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 16 or 17 .
19 is a diagram illustrating table information regarding a degree of harmony between types included in a result of a Myers-Briggs-Type Indicator (MBTI) test of FIG. 15 .

Since the present invention can have various changes and can have various embodiments, specific embodiments are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail. However, this is not intended to limit the present invention to specific embodiments, and it should be understood that the present invention includes all modifications, equivalents and substitutes included in the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Terms such as first and second may be used to describe various elements, but the elements should not be limited by the terms. The above terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another. For example, without departing from the scope of the present invention, a first component may be referred to as a second component, and similarly, a second component may also be referred to as a first component. The term "and/or" includes any combination of a plurality of related listed items or any of a plurality of related listed items.

When an element is referred to as being "connected" or "connected" to another element, it is understood that it may be directly connected or connected to the other element, but other elements may exist in between. it will be 　On the other hand, when it is mentioned that a certain element is "directly connected" or "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that another element does not exist in the middle.

The terms used in this application are used only to describe specific embodiments, and are not intended to limit the present invention. The singular expression includes the plural expression unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. In the present application, terms such as “comprise” or “have” are intended to designate that a feature, number, step, operation, component, part, or a combination thereof described in the specification exists, but one or more other features It is to be understood that it does not preclude the possibility of the presence or addition of elements, numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

In this regard, the terms "about", "substantially", etc. to the extent used throughout the specification are used in or close to the numerical value when manufacturing and material tolerances inherent in the stated meaning are presented, and To help understand the invention, accurate or absolute figures are used to prevent an unconscionable infringer from using the mentioned disclosure unfairly. As used throughout the specification of the present invention, the term “step to (to)” or “step to step” does not mean “step for step”.

In this specification, the term "part" includes a unit realized by hardware, a unit realized by software, and a unit realized using both. Also, one unit may be realized using two or more hardware, and two or more units may be realized by one hardware.

Some of the operations or functions described as being performed by the terminal, the apparatus, or the device in this specification may be performed instead of the terminal, the apparatus, or a server connected to the device. Similarly, some of the operations or functions described as being performed by the server may also be performed in a terminal, apparatus, or device connected to the server.

Unless defined otherwise, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Generally, terms such as those defined in the dictionary should be interpreted as having a meaning consistent with the meaning in the context of the related art, and unless explicitly defined in the present application, it should not be construed as an ideal or excessively formal meaning. does not

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. In describing the present invention, in order to facilitate the overall understanding, the same reference numerals are used for the same components in the drawings, and duplicate descriptions of the same components are omitted.

1 is a diagram illustrating terminals performing a position recommendation method based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1 , the method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention transmits and receives information between a user's disposition-based position recommendation server (hereinafter, the server 100 ) and the user terminal 200 . can be done through Here, the user terminal may represent an electronic device used by the user or an electronic device corresponding to the user, and the user may be represented as a participant according to an expression method.

For example, the user terminal may represent an electronic device capable of communicating and computing, and a communicable desktop computer, a laptop computer, a notebook, a smart phone, a tablet PC ( tablet PC), mobile phone, smart watch, smart glass, e-book reader, PMP (portable multimedia player), portable game console, navigation device, digital camera camera), DMB (digital multimedia broadcasting) player, digital audio recorder, digital audio player, digital video recorder, digital video player, PDA (Personal) Digital Assistant), but is not limited thereto.

For example, the server 100 provides the user terminal 200 with at least one of a California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test, a Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B) test, and a Myers-Briggs-Type Indicator (MBTI) test. It is possible to provide query information for the examination, and obtain answer information corresponding to the query information from the user terminal 200 to obtain information on at least one of CPI examination result information, FIRO-B examination result information, and MBTI examination result information. can be derived.

Or, for example, the user terminal 200 may obtain information about at least one of CPI test result information, FIRO-B test result information, and MBTI test result information from a separate external server and provide it to the server 100 . Also, at least one test result information among CPI test result information, FIRO-B test result information, and MBTI test result information stored in a memory or a storage device may be provided to the server 100 .

2 is a block diagram of a server that performs a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2 , the server 100 performing the method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition according to an embodiment of the present invention may be referred to as a position recommendation apparatus 100 based on a user's disposition. Here, the position recommendation apparatus 100 based on the user's disposition may include at least one processor 110 and a memory 120 , and may include a transceiver 130 , an input interface device 140 , and an output interface device 150 . ) and at least one of the storage device 160 may be further included. In addition, each component included in the position recommendation apparatus 100 based on the user's disposition may be connected by a bus 170 to communicate with each other.

For example, the at least one processor 110 may be a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), or a dedicated processor on which methods according to embodiments of the present invention are performed. can mean Each of the memory 120 and the storage device 160 may be configured of at least one of a volatile storage medium and a non-volatile storage medium. For example, the memory 120 may be one of a read only memory (ROM) and a random access memory (RAM), and the storage device 160 is a flash-memory. , a hard disk drive (HDD), a solid state drive (SSD), or various memory cards (eg, micro SD card).

For example, the memory 120 or the storage device 160 may store at least one instruction that can be executed by the at least one processor 110 . For example, the at least one command is a command for obtaining information about a California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test result including a user's first score for each of a plurality of CPI individual items from the user terminal, a command for obtaining a preset general member of a company a first suitability score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items and an instruction to determine whether the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise based on the first score, indicating that the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise an instruction for deriving a first position among the plurality of positions based on the first score and a second suitable score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items for each of the plurality of positions within the enterprise when determining and a command for providing the first position to the user terminal as a recommended position of the user.

Here, when it is determined that the user is not suitable as a general member of the company, the first score among the plurality of CPI individual items falls short of at least one CPI individual item that is not included in the first suitable score range. It may further include a command for deriving an item and a command for providing information on improvement plan for the under-CPI item to the user terminal.

Here, a command for obtaining FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result information including the user's second score for each of the plurality of FIRO-B individual items from the user terminal, the plurality of FIRO-Bs An instruction for obtaining a third score of another user of a second position for each of the individual items, an instruction for calculating a mutual reconciliation score based on the second score and the third score, and an instruction for calculating a mutual reconciliation score based on the mutual reconciliation score and a command for deriving information on the possibility of a relationship conflict between the other users and providing the information to the user terminal, wherein the second position is a position primarily connected to the first position on a preset position relationship diagram within the company can indicate

Here, when the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict includes information that the possibility of the relationship conflict is high, a command to obtain the first feedback information of the user corresponding to the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict from the user terminal Further comprising, the command to provide the first position to the user terminal as the recommended position of the user may include a command to determine the first position as the recommended position based on the first feedback information.

Here, the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict is determined based on information about a specific mutual harmony score range in which the mutual harmony score is included among a plurality of preset mutual harmony score ranges, and the plurality of FIRO-B individual items These include a affiliation expression item, a affiliation expectation item, a control expression item, a control expectation item, a testis expression item, and an emotion expectation item, and the reciprocity score is the first reciprocity score for the belonging desire item and the first reciprocity score for the control desire item. 2 including a reciprocity score and a third reciprocity score for the emotional desire item, wherein the first reciprocity score is a first between the score of the affiliation expression item among the second scores and the score of the belonging expectation item among the third scores The difference and the second difference between the score of the expected belonging item among the second scores and the score of the belonging expression item of the third score is calculated as the sum of the difference, and the second mutual harmony score is the score of the control expression item among the second scores and a third difference between the scores of the control expectation items among the third scores and the fourth difference between the scores of the control expectation items among the second scores and the scores of the control expression items among the third scores, wherein the third The mutual harmony score is the fifth difference between the score of the emotion expression item of the second score and the score of the emotion expectation item of the third score, the score of the emotion expectation item of the second score, and the emotion expression item of the third score It can be calculated as the sum of the sixth difference between the scores.

Here, a command for obtaining information about the first type of the user from among a plurality of MBTI types from the user terminal, a command for obtaining information about a second type of the other user from among the plurality of MBTI types, and the first The method may further include a command for deriving information on the possibility of a task conflict between the user and the other user based on the first type and the second type and providing the information to the user terminal.

Here, when the information on the possibility of the task conflict includes information indicating that the possibility of the task conflict is high, a command to obtain the user's second feedback information corresponding to the information on the possibility of the task conflict from the user terminal Further comprising, the command to provide the first position to the user terminal as the recommended position of the user may include a command to determine the first position as the recommended position based on the second feedback information.

Here, the information about the possibility of the task conflict may be determined based on the degree of harmony between the first type and the second type derived according to table information on the degree of harmony between the preset MBTI types.

A detailed description of each operation will be described later in detail according to each embodiment.

<Example 1 - Position recommendation method using CPI test>

3 is a diagram for explaining a first embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.

Referring to FIG. 3 , the method for recommending a position according to an embodiment of the present invention may be performed based on result information of a CPI examination. Alternatively, the position recommendation method may be performed based on a result according to a preset pre-exam and result information of the CPI test. Thereafter, the user may receive business training (eg, a Business Network International (BNI) chapter) including training and workshops on CPI. Here, the CPI test may represent a personality test by a questionnaire method that measures personality characteristics of normal people.

In one embodiment, the user's first score (eg, 27 scales) for each of a plurality of items (eg, a plurality of CPI individual items) included in the result information of the CPI test and the preset company's It may be determined whether the user is suitable as a general member of the corresponding company based on a first suitability score range for each of the plurality of items that are identical to a general member (eg, an employee or a general member). For example, if the user's first score for each of the plurality of items is included in the range of the first suitable score for each of the plurality of items, an embodiment determines that the user is suitable as a general member of the corresponding company can do.

Or, for example, if at least one item among the plurality of items is out of the corresponding conformity score range, it may be determined that the user is not suitable as a general member of the corresponding company, and at least one item out of the conformity score range ( For example, it is possible to confirm to the user through the user terminal whether there is a notification about an under-qualified measure or under-qualified CPI item) and whether there is an intention of character development training related thereto, and information that the intention of character development training exists from the user terminal is obtained In this case, the operation of consulting and training treatment #1 may be provided to the user by classifying the user as a semi-general member (eg, a semi-general member). Thereafter, according to an embodiment, the user may be converted from a semi-normal member to a general member through the operation of the consulting and educational treatment #1, and the consulting and educational treatment #1 will be described later with reference to FIG. 5 .

An embodiment provides a second suitability score range for each of a plurality of items related to each of a plurality of positions within the enterprise, and the above-described user's score when the user is determined to be suitable as a general member of the enterprise or when the user is converted to a general member of the enterprise. A first position among the plurality of positions may be derived based on the first score. For example, in one embodiment, a position in which the user's first score for each of the plurality of items among the plurality of positions is all included in the second suitable score range for each of the plurality of items may be determined as the first position. have. When there are a plurality of positions in which the user's first score for each of the plurality of items among the plurality of positions is all included in the second suitability score range for each of the plurality of items, the second suitability for each of the plurality of positions A difference value in which the first score deviates from a median value within the score range or a preset reference value may be derived, and the most suitable first position may be determined based on the sum of absolute values of the difference values for each of the plurality of items. Thereafter, according to an embodiment, the first position may be assigned or recommended to the user through the operation of consulting and educational treatment #2, and consulting and educational treatment #2 will be described later with reference to FIG. 6 .

Also, according to an embodiment, the determined first position may be provided to a user terminal corresponding to the user as a recommended position. For example, an embodiment may provide the first position as a recommended position to the user terminal after performing the operation of assigning or recommending the first position determined in the operation of consulting and educational treatment #2. In addition, among the plurality of positions, the case of positions included in the presidency and the cases of positions not included in the presidency are separated from each other in the relationship diagram between positions. A1 to be described later may be referred to together with , and B1 to be described later together with FIG. 8 may be referred to.

FIG. 4 is a view for explaining a plurality of items included in a result of a California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test of FIG. 3 .

Referring to FIG. 4 , a plurality of items included in the CPI test result are 27 in all, initiative, status increase desire, sociability, social presence, self-acceptance, independence, empathy, responsibility, sociality, self-control, liking, May include conformity, well-being, generosity, adaptive achievement, independent achievement, intellectual efficiency, sensitivity, flexibility, interpersonal sensitivity, managerial potential, work-orientation, creative temperament, leadership potential, friendliness, norm/norm orientation, and tenacity. However, since this is an example, a plurality of items (eg, a plurality of CPI individual items) is not limited thereto.

For example, the plurality of items may be classified into five parts, in which the first part may include initiative, desire to rise, sociability, social presence, self-acceptance, independence, and empathy, and the second part may include responsibility, Sociability, self-control, sympathy, conformity, well-being and generosity may be included, the third part may include adaptive achievement, independent achievement and intellectual efficiency, and the fourth part may include sensitivity, flexibility and interpersonal sensitivity Part 5 may include managerial potential, work orientation, creative temperament, leadership potential, friendliness, norm/norm orientation, and tenacity.

For each of the plurality of items, a score within a range of 0 or more and 100 or less may be determined, and the score may be included in the result information of the CPI test.

Also, according to an embodiment, level information may be determined according to a score criterion for a plurality of items, and the first part to the fourth part may be set the same as the score criterion, and the fifth part may be set differently. have.

For example, when the score for the items included in the first to fourth parts is 0 or more and 29 or less, the level information of the item may be determined as very low, and the score is included in 30 or more and 45 or less In this case, the level information of the corresponding item may be determined as Low, the level information of the corresponding item may be determined as Normal if the score is 46 or more and 54 or less, and High if the score is 55 or more and 70 or less Level information may be determined, and when the score is 71 or more and 100 or less, the level information of the corresponding item may be determined as very high.

Or, for example, for the items included in the fifth part, when the score is 0 or more and 19 or less, the level information of the item can be determined as very low, and when the score is 20 or more and 40 or less, it is low. The level information of the corresponding item can be determined, and when the score is 41 or more and 59 or less, the level information of the corresponding item can be determined as Normal, and when the score is 60 or more and 80 or less, the level information of the corresponding item is High may be determined, and if the score is included in 81 or more and 100 or less, the level information of the corresponding item may be determined as very high.

A first fit score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items with respect to the general member described in FIG. 3 and/or a second fit score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items with respect to each of a plurality of positions is each Level information corresponding to an appropriate level among level information including very high, high, normal, low, and very low may be indicated. For example, the first fit score range for the particular item may be set to very high, high, and medium among very high, high, medium, low, and very low, and the first fit score range for the other particular item may be Very High, High, Normal, Low, and Very Low, which can be set to High, Normal, and Low. Here, the first suitability score range or the second suitability score range is set as level information, and may be referred to as a first suitability level range or a second suitability level range.

FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #1 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 3 .

Referring to FIG. 5 , in step #1 of consulting and training treatment according to an embodiment, it is determined that the user is not suitable as a general member of the company (eg, a general member), and thus a semi-normal member (eg, a semi-regular member) ), it is possible to provide the corresponding user with CPI-related information and information on improvement plans for the CPI items that are not met (eg, the scale that is not met). Here, the information on the improvement plan for the incomplete CPI item may include various information such as podcasts, books, and education for improving the incomplete CPI item.

In other words, in step #1 of consulting and education treatment according to an embodiment, after CPI orientation is first performed, an understanding process of four personality types and an understanding process of 27 personality scales related to CPI may be performed, and the final result Interpretation and participant feedback processes may be performed.

In addition, one embodiment may provide information (or improvement plan information) corresponding to the unsatisfactory scale, and based on this, information on individual learning and group learning may be provided to help perform learning, and then A reflection log writing process may be performed.

When the above-described process is completed, the CPI test may be performed again, and the result of the retest may be interpreted again. Based on the retest result, if the substandard scale again falls below (or out of) the corresponding first appropriate score range, it is possible to return to the process of providing information (or improvement plan information) corresponding to the above-mentioned substandard scale, and , if a substandard scale based on the retest results falls within (or is met) the corresponding first fit score range, the user is transferred from a quasi-normal member (eg, a quasi-general member) to a general member (eg, a quasi-normal member) general member).

FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #2 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 3 .

Referring to FIG. 6 , in step #2 of consulting and education treatment according to an embodiment, a user receives a plurality of based on a second suitable score range and a first score for each of a plurality of CPI individual items for each of a plurality of positions It may include the process of deriving the first position among the positions of the. That is, a specific position may be assigned or determined to the user based on the second suitability score range and the first score, and when the first score is out of the second suitability score range of all of the plurality of positions, a method for improving CPI items that are not met You may also provide information. In this case, the CPI item that is not satisfied may be determined based on the second suitable score range and the second score of the position in which the smallest number of items among the plurality of positions is not satisfied, but is not limited thereto.

Consulting and education treatment step #2 according to an embodiment performs the same operation as step #1 of consulting and education treatment except for some operations, so the description of the same operation will be omitted and only some different operations will be described.

In step #2 of consulting and education treatment according to an embodiment, after performing the final result interpretation and participant feedback process, among a plurality of positions, if there is a position that is satisfied based on the second suitable score range and the first score , it may be determined or assigned to the user's position.

In addition, the CPI test can be performed again in the consulting and educational treatment #2 step according to an embodiment, and the result of the retest can be reinterpreted. Based on the result of the retest, the first appropriate score corresponding to the incomplete scale. When it is included in the range (or if it is satisfied), the reference position from which the unsatisfied scale is derived according to the position in which the smallest number of items are unsatisfied may be determined or assigned as the user's position.

FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions of the chairperson corresponding to A1 of FIG. 3 , and FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining a relationship diagram between positions other than the chairperson corresponding to B1 of FIG. 3 .

In the case of a position included in the chairperson among a plurality of positions, a relationship diagram between the positions may be as shown in FIG. 7 . For example, a position primarily connected to the chairperson may appear as vice-chairperson and ST, and a position primarily connected to the vice-chairperson may indicate a member included in the membership committee. Here, ST may represent a Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

In the case of a position that is not included in the chairperson among the plurality of positions, a relationship diagram between the positions may be as shown in FIG. 8 . For example, a position primarily linked to a training coordinator may appear as a member of the training coordinator's team, a position primarily linked to a mentoring coordinator may appear as a member of the mentoring coordinator's team, and a position primarily linked to a growth coordinator may appear as a member of the team in the mentoring coordinator. may appear as a member of the growth coordinator's team, a position primarily associated with the event coordinator may appear as a member of the event coordinator's team, a position primarily associated with the visitor host may appear as a member of the visitor host's team, and PR Positions primarily linked to the coordinator may appear as a member of the PR coordinator's team.

In the case of another embodiment to be described later, information on mutual harmony and/or temperament harmonization is derived primarily between positions connected to each other, but in the case of the first embodiment, FIRO-B test results and/or MBTI test results are not used. may be omitted.

<Second Example - Position recommendation method using CPI test and FIRO-B test>

9 is a diagram for explaining a second embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.

Referring to FIG. 9 , the position recommendation method according to an embodiment of the present invention may be performed based on result information of a CPI test and result information of a FIRO-B test. Alternatively, the position recommendation method may be performed based on a result according to a preset pre-inspection, result information of the CPI examination, and result information of the FIRO-B examination. Thereafter, the user may receive business training including training and workshops on CPI and business training including training and workshops on FIRO-B (eg, a Business Network International (BNI) chapter). Here, the FIRO-B test may represent a test for evaluating how the propensity for interpersonal relationships affects behavior.

For example, the result information of the FIRO-B examination is information used to determine the mutual harmony between the positions primarily connected among the plurality of positions, and may be used only in A2 and/or B2. Therefore, in addition to the above-described operation, the operation shown in FIG. 9 performs the same operation as that of FIG. 3 , and a description of the same operation will be omitted.

In addition, among the plurality of positions, the case of the position included in the presidency and the case of the position not included in the presidency are separated from each other in the relationship diagram between the positions. A2 to be described later may be referred to together with , and B2 to be described later may be referred to together with FIG. 11 .

10 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the positions of the chairmanship corresponding to A2 of FIG. 9 and the mutual harmony according to the relationship, and FIG. 11 is a diagram showing the relationship between positions other than the chairmanship corresponding to B2 of FIG. 9 and the relationship It is a diagram for explaining the mutual harmony.

In the case of a position included in the chairperson among a plurality of positions, a relationship diagram between the positions may be the same as that of FIG. 10 , and may be the same as the relationship diagram shown in FIG. 7 . In addition, in the case of a position that is not included in the chairperson among the plurality of positions, the relationship diagram between the positions may be the same as in FIG. 11 , and may be the same as the relationship diagram shown in FIG. 8 .

However, in the second embodiment, it is possible to determine mutual reconciliation based on the result information of the FIRO-B test between the positions primarily connected to each other in FIG. 10 or 11 . For example, mutual harmony may be related to the possibility of relationship conflict, and in one embodiment, when it is determined that the possibility of relationship conflict is high based on mutual harmony, information about this may be provided to the user terminal, and in response thereto The first feedback information to be obtained may be obtained from the user through the user terminal. In this case, an embodiment may determine or allocate the first position as the recommended position based on the first feedback information.

For example, the process of determining the first position as the recommended position in consideration of mutual harmony may include an operation according to step #3 of the consultation and education treatment between the two.

12 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #3 of the consulting and education treatment of FIG. 10 or 11 .

Referring to FIG. 12, in step #3 of consulting and education treatment according to an embodiment, after FIRO-B orientation is first performed, the understanding process of three-dimensional interpersonal needs related to FIRO-B can be performed, The process of understanding the reciprocity through the six cells may then be performed, and the final result interpretation and participant feedback process may be performed. Here, 6 cells may represent a plurality of FIRO-B individual items.

Thereafter, an embodiment may determine whether mutual harmony between the two is satisfied, and when the mutual harmony is satisfied, the first position may be determined or assigned as a recommended position. Alternatively, according to an embodiment, when mutual harmony is not satisfied, information on the possibility of a relationship conflict may be derived and this may be provided to the user terminal. In this case, as described above, the first feedback information regarding the possibility of a relationship conflict may be obtained from the user terminal, and based on this, the first position may be determined or assigned as a recommended position.

Whether the above-described mutual harmony between the two is satisfied may be determined based on the mutual harmony score, and a detailed description thereof will be described later with reference to FIGS. 13 and 14 .

13 is a view for explaining a plurality of items included in a result of a Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B) test of FIG. 9 .

Referring to FIG. 13 , the result information of the FIRO-B test may include a plurality of FIRO-B individual items and scores for each individual item. For example, the plurality of FIRO-B individual items may be 6, and there may be 6 items of expression of belonging (eI), expected item of belonging (wI), item of control expression (eC), expectation item of control (wC), item of expression of emotion (eA). ) and sentiment expectation items (wA).

For example, in one embodiment, the sum of the score of the affiliation expression item (eI) and the affiliation expectation item (wI) among the scores (second score) for a plurality of FIRO-B individual items of the user is the affiliation desire ( It can be expressed as the score of I), and the sum of the score of the control expression item (eC) and the control expectation item (wC) can be expressed as the score of the control desire (C), and the score of the emotion expression item (eA) and The sum of the scores of the emotional expectation item (wA) may be expressed as the score of the emotional desire (A). In addition, the sum of the score of the belonging expression item (eI), the score of the controlled expression item (eC), and the score of the emotion expression item (eA) can be expressed as the score of the expression behavior (e), and the expectation of belonging item (wI) The sum of the score, the score of the control expectation item (wC), and the score of the emotional expectation item (wA) may be expressed as a score of the expected behavior (w).

One embodiment is to calculate a mutual reconciliation score between the user and the other user based on the user's second score for the plurality of FIRO-B individual items and the third score for the plurality of FIRO-B individual items of the other user. and it can be determined whether the mutual harmony between the two is satisfied based on the mutual harmony score. Here, the other user may represent a user having a second position primarily connected to the first position on a pre-set position relationship diagram within the company.

For example, the information about the possibility of a relationship conflict may be determined based on information about a specific mutual harmony score range including a mutual harmony score calculated from among a plurality of preset mutual harmony score ranges. The mutual harmony score will be described next with reference to FIG. 14 .

14 is a diagram for explaining a mutual harmony score for each desire based on a plurality of items of FIG. 13 .

Referring to FIG. 14 , the mutual harmony score between the two is the first mutual harmony score for the belonging desire item (I), the second mutual harmony score for the control desire item (C), and the third mutual harmony score for the emotional desire item (A) It may include a reciprocity score.

For example, the first reciprocity score, the second reciprocity score, and the third reciprocity score between the first user and the second user may be calculated as in Equation (1).

Referring to Equation 1, eI ₁ and eI ₂ may represent the scores of the items belonging to the first user and the second user, respectively, and wI ₁ and wI ₂ are the expected items belonging to the first user and the second user, respectively. can represent the score of In addition, eC ₁ and eC ₂ may represent the scores of the control expression items of the first user and the second user, respectively, and wC ₁ and wC ₂ may represent the scores of the control expectation items of the first user and the second user, respectively. have. In addition, eA ₁ and eA ₂ may represent the scores of the sentiment expression items of the first user and the second user, respectively, and wA ₁ and wA ₂ may represent the scores of the sentiment expectation items of the first user and the second user, respectively. have.

That is, the first reciprocity score between the user corresponding to the second score and the other user corresponding to the third score is the first difference between the score of the affiliation expression item among the second scores and the score of the expected affiliation item among the third scores. It may be calculated as the sum of the second difference between the score of the expected belonging item among the 2 scores and the score of the belonging expression item among the third scores, and the second reciprocity score is the score of the control expression item among the second scores and the third score The third difference between the scores of the control expectation item and the fourth difference between the score of the control expectation item among the second scores and the score of the control expression item among the third scores may be calculated as a sum of the third difference, and the third reciprocity score is the second score It can be calculated as the sum of the fifth difference between the score of the emotion expression item in the middle score and the score of the emotion expectation item in the third score, and the sixth difference between the score of the emotion expectation item in the second score, and the score of the emotion expression item in the third score have.

According to an embodiment, the plurality of reciprocity score ranges may include four ranges including high, moderate, effort required, and relationship consideration required, and a high range according to each reciprocity score may be 0 or more and 5 or less, and , the normal range may be 6 or more and 10 or less, the effort required range may be 11 or more and 15 or less, and the relationship consideration required range may be 16 or more and 18 or less.

For example, an embodiment may derive a specific reciprocal reconciliation score range including each of three reciprocal reconciliation scores, and determine information regarding the possibility of a relationship conflict based on the information.

<Third Example - Position recommendation method using CPI test, FIRO-B test and MBTI test>

15 is a diagram for explaining a third embodiment of a method for recommending a position based on a user's disposition.

Referring to FIG. 15 , the position recommendation method according to an embodiment of the present invention may be performed based on result information of a CPI test, result information of a FIRO-B test, and result information of an MBTI test. Alternatively, the position recommendation method may be performed based on a result according to a preset pre-exam, result information of the CPI test, information on the result of the FIRO-B test, and information on the result of the MBTI test. Thereafter, the user may receive business training including training and workshops on CPI, business training including training and workshops on FIRO-B, and business training including training and workshops on MBTI (e.g., Business Network (BNI) International) chapter). Here, the MBTI test may represent a self-reported personality type test devised by Myers and Briggs based on the psychological typology of Carl Jung, a Swiss psychoanalyst.

For example, the MBTI test result information is information used to determine the confidentiality and harmony between positions that are primarily connected among a plurality of positions. can Accordingly, in addition to the above-described operation, the operation shown in FIG. 15 performs the same operation as that of FIG. 3 , and a description of the same operation will be omitted.

In addition, among the plurality of positions, the case of positions included in the presidency and the cases of positions not included in the presidency are separated from each other in the relationship diagram between positions. A3 to be described later may be referred to together with , and B3 to be described later together with FIG. 17 may be referred to.

16 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the positions of the presidency corresponding to A3 of FIG. 15 and mutual harmony/temperament harmony according to the relationship, and FIG. 17 is a relationship diagram between positions other than the presidency corresponding to B3 of FIG. 15 And it is a diagram for explaining mutual harmony / temperament harmony according to the relationship.

In the case of a position included in the chairperson among a plurality of positions, a relationship diagram between the positions may be the same as that of FIG. 16 , and may be the same as the relationship diagram shown in FIG. 7 . In addition, in the case of a position not included in the chairperson among the plurality of positions, the relationship diagram between the positions may be the same as that of FIG. 17 , and may be the same as the relationship diagram shown in FIG. 8 .

However, in the third embodiment, it is possible to determine the mutual harmony based on the result information of the FIRO-B test and the temperament harmony (personality) based on the result information of the MBTI test between the positions primarily connected to each other in FIG. 16 or 17 . For example, temperament harmony (personality) may be related to the possibility of task conflict, and in one embodiment, when it is determined that the possibility of task conflict is high based on temperament harmony (personality), information about this is provided to the user terminal , and the corresponding second feedback information may be obtained from the user through the user terminal. In this case, an embodiment may determine or assign the first position as the recommended position based on the first feedback information and/or the second feedback information.

For example, the process of determining the first position as the recommended position in consideration of mutual harmony and temperament harmony (personality) may include an operation according to step #4 of consulting and training between the two.

FIG. 18 is a diagram for explaining operations performed in step #4 of consulting and education treatment of FIG. 16 or 17 .

Referring to FIG. 18, in step #4 of consulting and education treatment according to an embodiment, after the FIRO-B orientation is first performed, the understanding process of three-dimensional interpersonal needs related to FIRO-B can be performed, The process of understanding the reciprocity through the six cells may then be performed. In addition, MBTI orientation may be performed, an understanding process of eight preference indicators may be performed, and an understanding process of intelligence and competency through four temperaments may be performed. However, since MBTI results may be derived as one of 16 types, an understanding of preference indicators for the 16 types or an understanding of functions and capabilities through a temperament based thereon may be performed.

Thereafter, an embodiment may determine whether mutual harmony between the two is satisfied, and when the mutual harmony is satisfied, the first position may be determined or assigned as a recommended position. Alternatively, according to an embodiment, when mutual harmony is not satisfied, information on the possibility of a relationship conflict may be derived and this may be provided to the user terminal.

Also, in one embodiment, it may be determined whether the temperament harmony between the two is satisfied, and when the temperament harmony is satisfied, the first position may be determined or assigned as a recommended position. Alternatively, according to an embodiment, when temperament harmony is not satisfied, information on the possibility of a task conflict may be derived and this may be provided to the user terminal.

In this case, as described above, the first feedback information on the possibility of a relationship conflict and/or the second feedback information on the possibility of a task conflict can be obtained from the user terminal, and the first position is determined as the recommended position based on this information or can be assigned.

For example, mutual compatibility may be determined in the same manner as described in the second embodiment, and it may be determined whether or not temperament compatibility is satisfied based on information about a type between both among a plurality of MBTI types. A detailed description will be given later with reference to FIG. 19 .

19 is a diagram illustrating table information regarding a degree of harmony between types included in a result of a Myers-Briggs-Type Indicator (MBTI) test of FIG. 15 .

The MBTI test result information may include information about one of 16 types for each user. For example, the 16 types may include, but are not limited to, INFP, ENFP, INFJ, ENFJ, INTJ, ENTJ, INTP, ENTP, ISFP, ESFP, ISTP, ESTP, ISFJ, ESFJ, ISTJ and ESTJ. . It can also be derived from 4 substrates instead of 16 types.

The above-described temperament harmony may indicate a degree of harmony between MBTI types.

Referring to FIG. 19 , according to an embodiment, a degree of harmony between types may be determined based on information about a first type of a user and information about a second type of another user. Here, the degree of harmonization between types may be determined according to table information regarding the degree of harmonization between preset MBTI types as shown in FIG. 19 . In FIG. 19 , O may indicate a high degree of harmonization, Δ may indicate a moderate degree of harmonization, and X may indicate a low degree of harmonization.

For example, according to an embodiment, information on the possibility of a task conflict between a user and another user may be derived based on the first type and the second type and provided to the user terminal. Here, when the degree of harmony is high, the possibility of task conflict can be determined to be low, and when the degree of harmony is average, the possibility of task conflict can be determined as moderate, and when the degree of harmony is low However, it can be judged that the possibility of task conflict is high.

The operation according to the embodiment of the present specification can be implemented as a computer-readable program or code on a computer-readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium includes all types of recording devices in which data that can be read by a computer system is stored. In addition, the computer-readable recording medium may be distributed in a network-connected computer system to store and execute computer-readable programs or codes in a distributed manner.

When the embodiment is implemented in software, the above-described technique may be implemented as a module (process, function, etc.) that performs the above-described function. A module may be stored in a memory and executed by a processor. The memory may be internal or external to the processor, and may be coupled to the processor by various well-known means.

In addition, the computer-readable recording medium may include a hardware device specially configured to store and execute program instructions, such as ROM, RAM, and flash memory. The program instructions may include not only machine language codes such as those generated by a compiler, but also high-level language codes that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter or the like.

Although some aspects of the invention have been described in the context of an apparatus, it may also represent a description according to a corresponding method, wherein a block or apparatus corresponds to a method step or feature of a method step. Similarly, aspects described in the context of a method may also represent a corresponding block or item or a corresponding device feature. Some or all of the method steps may be performed by (or using) a hardware device such as, for example, a microprocessor, programmable computer or electronic circuit. In some embodiments, one or more of the most important method steps may be performed by such an apparatus.

In embodiments, a programmable logic device (eg, a field programmable gate array) may be used to perform some or all of the functions of the methods described herein. In embodiments, the field programmable gate array may operate in conjunction with a microprocessor to perform one of the methods described herein. In general, the methods are preferably performed by some hardware device.

Although the above has been described with reference to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, those skilled in the art can variously modify and change the present invention within the scope without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as described in the claims below. You will understand that it can be done.

delete

Claims (9)

As a position recommendation method based on a user's propensity performed by a server,
obtaining, from a user terminal, California Psychological Inventory (CPI) test result information including a user's first score for each of a plurality of CPI individual items;
determining whether the user is suitable as a general member of the company based on a preset first score range and the first score for each of the plurality of CPI individual items for a general member of the company;
When the user determines that the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise, based on the first score and a second suitability score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items for each of a plurality of positions within the enterprise, the plurality of deriving a first position among the positions of and
Comprising the step of providing the first position to the user terminal as a recommended position of the user,
obtaining, from the user terminal, FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result information including a user's second score for each of a plurality of FIRO-B individual items;
obtaining a third score of another user of a second position for each of the plurality of FIRO-B individual items;
calculating a reciprocity score based on the second score and the third score; and
Further comprising the step of deriving information on the possibility of a relationship conflict between the user and the other user based on the mutual reconciliation score and providing it to the user terminal,
The second position represents a position primarily connected to the first position on a preset position relationship diagram within the company,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. The method according to claim 1,
When it is determined that the user is not suitable as a general member of the company, at least one CPI individual item whose first score is not included in the first suitable score range among the plurality of CPI individual items is set as an under-CPI item. deriving; and
Further comprising the step of providing information on the improvement plan of the under-CPI item to the user terminal,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. delete The method according to claim 1,
When the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict includes information indicating that the possibility of the relationship conflict is high, the method further comprising the step of obtaining first feedback information of the user corresponding to the information on the possibility of the relationship conflict from the user terminal do,
The step of providing the first position to the user terminal as a recommended position of the user comprises:
Comprising the step of determining the first position as the recommended position based on the first feedback information,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. The method according to claim 1,
The information on the possibility of the relationship conflict is determined based on information about a specific mutual harmony score range in which the mutual harmony score is included among a plurality of preset mutual harmony score ranges;
The plurality of FIRO-B individual items include affiliation expression item, belonging expectation item, control expression item, control expectation item, testicular expression item, and emotion expectation item,
The reciprocity score includes a first reciprocity score for the belonging desire item, a second reciprocity score for the control desire item, and a third reciprocity score for the emotional desire item,
The first reciprocity score is a first difference between the score of the affiliation expression item among the second scores and the score of the expected affiliation item among the third scores, the score of the expected affiliation item among the second scores, and affiliation among the third scores It is calculated as the sum of the second difference between the scores of the expression items,
The second reciprocity score is a third difference between a score of a control expression item of the second score and a score of a control expectation item of the third score, and a score of a control expectation item of the second score and a control of the third score It is calculated as the sum of the fourth difference between the scores of the expression items,
The third reciprocity score is a fifth difference between the score of the emotion expression item of the second score and the score of the emotion expectation item of the third score, the score of the emotion expectation item of the second score, and the emotion of the third score Calculated as the sum of the sixth difference between the scores of the expression items,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. The method according to claim 1,
obtaining information about a first type of the user from among a plurality of MBTI types from the user terminal;
obtaining information about a second type of the other user from among the plurality of MBTI types; and
Further comprising the step of deriving information on the possibility of a task conflict between the user and the other user based on the first type and the second type and providing the information to the user terminal,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. 7. The method of claim 6,
When the information on the possibility of the task conflict includes information indicating that the possibility of the task conflict is high, obtaining second feedback information of the user corresponding to the information on the possibility of the task conflict from the user terminal do,
The step of providing the first position to the user terminal as a recommended position of the user comprises:
Comprising the step of determining the first position as the recommended position based on the second feedback information,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. 7. The method of claim 6,
The information on the possibility of the task conflict is determined based on the degree of harmony between the first type and the second type derived according to table information on the degree of harmony between the preset MBTI types,
Position recommendation method based on user's disposition. As a server that performs a position recommendation method based on a user's disposition,
processor; and
a memory storing at least one instruction for executing the method by the processor;
The at least one command is
It is executed to obtain information about the result of CPI (California Psychological Inventory) examination including the user's first score for each of the plurality of CPI individual items from the user terminal,
and determine whether the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise based on a first fit score range and the first score for each of the plurality of CPI individual items with respect to a preset general member of the enterprise;
When the user determines that the user is suitable as a general member of the enterprise, based on the first score and a second suitability score range for each of the plurality of CPI individual items for each of a plurality of positions within the enterprise, the plurality of is executed to derive the first position among the positions of
is executed to provide the first position as a recommended position of the user to the user terminal;
is executed to obtain FIRO-B (Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior) test result information including the user's second score for each of the plurality of FIRO-B individual items from the user terminal;
and obtain a third score of another user of the second position for each of the plurality of FIRO-B individual items;
and calculating a reciprocity score based on the second score and the third score;
is executed to derive information about the possibility of a relationship conflict between the user and the other user based on the mutual reconciliation score and provide it to the user terminal,
The second position represents a position primarily connected to the first position on a preset position relationship diagram within the company,
server.

Images