KR102341636B1 - training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training contents - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for setting content training data for cognitive rehabilitation training. According to the present invention, the method comprises: a subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process of acquiring a subject's cognitive impairment information from the subject's information; a training data collection content preparation process for preparing training data collection content for collecting the subject's training data in response to the subject's cognitive impairment information; and a training data collection process of collecting the subject's training data through at least one adjustment selected from training difficulty, training time, number of repetitions, and combinations thereof of the training data collection content during the training data collection content preparation process for the subject, wherein the training data includes at least one selected from the training difficulty, the training time, and a combination thereof. According to the present invention, training data which is a training baseline optimized for cognitive rehabilitation training content for each subject for effective cognitive rehabilitation training of the subject through the cognitive rehabilitation training content can be set, thereby providing an effect of preventing unnecessary time wasted as a therapist or rehabilitator repeats a training process to set a training baseline for a subject or an erroneous training evaluation caused by an incorrect baseline.

Description

Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training {training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training contents}

The technology disclosed herein generally relates to content for cognitive rehabilitation training, and more specifically, to a method for setting content training data for cognitive rehabilitation training.

Cognitive impairment is often caused by developmental delay in children, and in adults or the elderly, it is often caused by brain damage due to an accident or by causes such as stroke.

The brain can change its function through repetitive learning or training, and this is based on neuroplasticity that new neurons can be generated through repetitive learning even after becoming an adult.

Based on brain plasticity, various methods and training tools have been developed to stimulate nerve cells damaged by various causes or to stimulate nerve cells that have not been activated due to developmental delay.

In addition, recently, many cognitive training contents using a computer or tablet PC using IT technology have been developed, and many studies are being conducted to confirm the effectiveness and reliability through clinical trials. Video games develop various digital training contents so that patients can have fun and focus, and continuous training is possible, so many cases are being published through research, and new training methods that can improve training methods through existing training tools and counseling are available. It's getting attention as a training method. Training using a video game or computer program can provide a training level suitable for various scenarios and patients, enabling personalized training that reflects individual cognitive abilities and characteristics. In the existing cognitive training method, clinical psychologists or rehabilitators decide through long-time counseling and observation to determine a patient's cognitive level and symptoms, but it is difficult to determine the game composition, scenario, and difficulty level for each video game because the game composition, scenario, and difficulty are different.

Cognitive training video games for the general public currently available in the market are learning games for normal people, and these games are difficult to use for people with disabilities who have characteristics different from normal people due to uniform game settings. As a result, the biggest problem may occur when training for the disabled video game is too difficult or does not match the level of the person, so the training is refused or stopped.

However, most of the currently developed cognitive training for video games do not support individual customized training settings, but set or select uniform difficulty and time, and most of these settings are determined by the experience of rehab or clinical psychologists. There is a problem that there is.

As a prior art related to contents for cognitive rehabilitation training, there is Korean Patent No. KR 10-0805274 "a method for treating cognitive impairment using a game and a recording medium thereof, and an apparatus for treating cognitive impairment using a game". The prior art has a feature of being able to record and analyze the user's performance results, but there is a problem in that it does not support individual customized training settings, and sets or selects uniform difficulty and time.

The technology disclosed in this specification is derived to solve the problems of the prior art, and is a training baseline optimized for cognitive rehabilitation training contents for each subject for effective cognitive rehabilitation training of subjects through cognitive rehabilitation training contents. It is to provide a technique on a method for setting training data for content training for cognitive rehabilitation that can set training data.

In one embodiment, a technology related to a content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training is disclosed (disclosure). The content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training includes a subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process for acquiring the subject's cognitive impairment information from the subject's information, and training for collecting training data of the subject in response to the cognitive impairment information of the subject In the training data collection content preparation process for preparing the data collection content and the subject's training data collection content execution process, the training difficulty, training time, repetition frequency, and combinations thereof of the training data collection content are selected from A training data collection process of collecting the training data of the subject through at least one adjustment, wherein the training data includes at least one selected from the training difficulty, the training time, and a combination thereof.

The training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed for input of the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data collection content may include at least one selected from the number of objects required for input of the correct answer and combinations thereof. The training time may include an execution time of the training data collection content.

The subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process includes a subject cognitive impairment level determination process for determining the subject's cognitive impairment level based on a normal person from at least one selected from the subject's gender, birth year, disability grade, and combinations thereof can do.

The training data collection content preparation process includes a cognitive training target determination process for determining a cognitive training target in response to the cognitive impairment level of the subject, and cognitive training for preparing content for cognitive training level judgment corresponding to the determined cognitive training target It may include a content preparation process for level judgment.

The training data collection process is a subject cognitive level typing process in which the subject's cognitive level is classified into a first type close to the normal level and a second type located far from the normal level with respect to a reference value, the cognitive level of the subject is the In the case of the first type, the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is started from high difficulty, and the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is gradually reduced according to the input result of the examinee, or When the cognitive level is the second type, starting the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level from low difficulty and gradually increasing the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level according to the input result of the examinee When the content difficulty adjustment process for training data collection and whether the subject's correct answer for the training data collection content reaches a correct answer reference value, the provision of the training data collection content to the subject is stopped, and from the input result of the subject It may include a training data securing process for securing the training data.

On the other hand, the content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training converts the training data into conversion training data requested by the other content when the subject performs cognitive rehabilitation training through content other than the content for the training data collection. It may further include a training data transformation process to transform. More specifically, the method for setting the content training data for cognitive rehabilitation training includes a subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process for acquiring the subject's cognitive impairment information from the subject's information, and the subject's cognitive impairment information in response to the subject's cognitive impairment information. In the training data collection content preparation process for preparing the training data collection content for training data collection and the subject's training data collection content execution process, the training difficulty, training time, number of repetitions of the training data collection content and A training data collection process of collecting the training data of the subject through at least one adjustment selected from a combination thereof, wherein the training data is at least one selected from the training difficulty, the training time, and a combination thereof Including one, when the subject performs cognitive rehabilitation training through content other than the content for the training data collection, a training data conversion process for converting the training data into the conversion training data required by the other content Including, the subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process, the training data collection content preparation process, the training data collection process, and the training data conversion process may be performed through the system.

In this case, the training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed to input the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data It may include at least one selected from the number of objects and combinations thereof required to input the correct answer of the content for collection. The training time may include an execution time of the training data collection content.

Through the training data conversion process, the allowable input time may be converted into at least one selected from a correct answer input time allowed for correct input of the other content, a correct answer input waiting time, and a combination thereof. The object movement speed may be directly converted to the movement speed of the object required for inputting the correct answer of the other content or may be set to 0 if the object necessary for inputting the correct answer of the other content does not exist. The number of necessary objects may be converted into the number of objects to be selected when the correct answer of the other content is input. Through the training data conversion process, the training time may be converted into the execution time of the other content.

The technology disclosed in the present specification can set a training baseline, which is training data optimized for content for cognitive rehabilitation training for each subject, for effective cognitive rehabilitation training of the subject through the content for cognitive rehabilitation training, so that the therapist or rehabilitator can set the subject's training base It can provide the effect of preventing unnecessary time wasted by repeating the training process for line setting or incorrect training evaluation caused by an incorrect baseline.

The foregoing provides only optional concepts in a simplified form for matters to be described in more detail later. It is not intended to limit key features or essential features of the claims, or to limit the scope of the claims.

1 is a flowchart of a content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training disclosed in the present specification according to an embodiment.
2 is a diagram conceptually illustrating a process of setting a training baseline, which is training data for performing contents for cognitive rehabilitation, through the method for setting training data for contents for cognitive rehabilitation disclosed in the present specification according to an embodiment.
3 is a view for explaining a method of determining the content for training data collection for determining the training baseline that is training data for performing the content for cognitive rehabilitation training.
4 is a diagram for explaining a method of collecting a training baseline, which is training data through content for collecting training data of the second type.
5 is a diagram for explaining a method of collecting a training baseline that is training data through the first type of training data collection content.
6 is a diagram showing a case in which an input allowable time and the number of objects are applied as training difficulty.
7 is a diagram showing a case in which an input allowable time and an object movement speed are applied as training difficulty.
8 is a view showing a case where training difficulty is integrated and applied as a step.

Hereinafter, embodiments disclosed herein will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Unless otherwise specified in the text, like reference numbers in the drawings indicate like elements. Exemplary embodiments described above in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not intended to be limiting, and other embodiments may be used, and other changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the technology disclosed herein. A person skilled in the art may arrange, construct, combine, and design in variously different configurations the components of the present disclosure, i.e., the components generally described herein and illustrated in the drawings, all of which are obviously It will be readily understood that the invention is intended to form a part of the present disclosure. In order to clearly express various layers (or films), regions, and shapes in the drawings, the width, length, thickness, or shape of the components may be exaggerated.

When it is referred to as “providing” one component to another component, the case in which the one component is directly provided to the other component, as well as a case in which an additional component is interposed therebetween, may be included.

Since the description of the disclosed technology is merely an embodiment for structural or functional description, the scope of the disclosed technology should not be construed as being limited by the embodiment described in the text. That is, since the embodiment may have various changes and may have various forms, it should be understood that the scope of the disclosed technology includes equivalents capable of realizing the technical idea.

The singular expression is to be understood as including the plural expression unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, and terms such as “comprises” or “have” refer to the embodied feature, number, step, action, component, part or these It is to be understood that this is intended to indicate that a combination exists, and does not preclude the possibility of addition or existence of one or more other features or numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

All terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed technology belongs, unless defined otherwise. Terms defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having the meaning consistent with the context of the related art, and cannot be interpreted as having an ideal or excessively formal meaning unless explicitly defined in the present application.

1 is a flowchart of a content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training disclosed in the present specification according to an embodiment. 2 is a diagram conceptually illustrating a process of setting a training baseline, which is training data for performing contents for cognitive rehabilitation, through the method for setting training data for contents for cognitive rehabilitation disclosed in the present specification according to an embodiment. 3 is a view for explaining a method of determining the content for training data collection for determining the training baseline that is training data for performing the content for cognitive rehabilitation training. 4 is a diagram for explaining a method of collecting a training baseline, which is training data through content for collecting training data of the second type. 5 is a diagram for explaining a method of collecting a training baseline that is training data through the first type of training data collection content. 6 is a diagram showing a case in which an input allowable time and the number of objects are applied as training difficulty. 7 is a diagram showing a case in which an input allowable time and an object movement speed are applied as training difficulty. 8 is a view showing a case where training difficulty is integrated and applied as a step.

Hereinafter, a method for setting content training data for cognitive rehabilitation training disclosed in the present specification by using the drawings will be described. Hereinafter, for convenience of description, the content training data setting method 100 for cognitive rehabilitation training will be referred to as the training data setting method 100 .

The training data setting method 100 includes a subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process 110 , a content preparation process 120 for training data collection, and a training data collection process 130 . In some other embodiments, the training data setting method 100 may optionally further include the training data conversion process 140 .

In the subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process 110, the subject's cognitive impairment information is acquired from the subject's information.

In the training data collection content preparation process 120, in response to the cognitive impairment information of the test subject, training data collection content for the subject's training data collection is prepared. The content for the training data collection is the content used by the subject to collect the training baseline, which is the training data optimized for the subject, as basic data for effective cognitive rehabilitation training of the subject when the subject proceeds with the contents for cognitive rehabilitation training. The training data collection content may be provided, for example, in the form of a game, but is not limited thereto.

In the training data collection process 130, through the adjustment of at least one selected from among the training difficulty, training time, number of repetitions, and combinations thereof of the training data collection content in the process of performing the training data collection content of the subject. The training data of the subject is collected.

The training data includes at least one selected from the training difficulty, the training time, and a combination thereof.

As an example, the training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed for input of the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data It may include at least one selected from the number of objects and combinations thereof required to input the correct answer of the content for collection.

The training time may include an execution time of the training data collection content.

The subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process 110 is a subject cognitive impairment level determination process for determining the subject's cognitive impairment level based on a normal person from at least one selected from the subject's gender, birth year, disability grade, and a combination thereof may include For example, in the process of determining the level of cognitive impairment of the subject, the level of cognitive impairment of the subject as a normal person may be determined from the level of cognitive impairment in the overall view or the level of cognitive impairment in a specific cognitive domain. In order to determine the level of cognitive impairment of the subject, the cognitive ability evaluation method or diagnosis of a professional therapist may be utilized.

The training data collection content preparation process 120 prepares a cognitive training target determination process for determining a cognitive training target in response to the cognitive impairment level of the subject and a cognitive training level determination content corresponding to the determined cognitive training target It may include a content preparation process for judging the cognitive training level.

Specifically, the cognitive training target determined in the cognitive training target determination process may be at least one selected from attention training, spatiotemporal perception training, memory training, problem solving ability training, and a combination thereof for the subject. . In the content preparation process for determining the cognitive training level, the content corresponding to the cognitive training target determined in the cognitive training target determination process may be prepared as the content for determining the cognitive training level.

The training data collection process 130 is a subject cognitive impairment level typing process of categorizing the cognitive impairment level of the subject into a first type close to a normal person level and a second type located far from a normal person level based on a reference value, When the cognitive impairment level is the first type, the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is started from high difficulty, and the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is gradually reduced according to the input result of the examinee or, when the cognitive impairment level of the test subject is the second type, starting the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level from a low difficulty, according to the input result of the subject, the content for judging the cognitive training level. When the content difficulty adjustment process for training data collection that gradually increases the training difficulty and whether the subject's correct answer for the training data collection content reaches the correct answer standard value, the training data collection content for the subject is stopped, and the It may include a training data securing process of securing the training data from the input result of the subject.

Specifically, the training data collection process 130 will be described. In the subject cognitive impairment level classification process, based on the predefined reference value for the cognitive training target of the subject determined through the cognitive training target determination process, the subject The subject may be classified into the first type or the second type depending on whether the person has a cognitive ability close to that of a normal person or has a cognitive ability that is much insufficient compared to a normal person. The reference value may be, for example, a median value of the standard cognitive impairment stage, but is not limited thereto.

Thereafter, in the training data collection content difficulty adjustment process, when the cognitive level of the examinee is the first type relatively close to a normal person, the cognitive training level according to the input result of the examinee to increase interest in the examination of the examinee The training difficulty of the content for judgment is reduced from a high training difficulty level to a low training difficulty level and provided, and in the case of the second type in which the cognitive level of the examinee is located relatively far from a normal person, the examinee's abandonment of the examination, etc. In order to prevent this, the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level may be increased from a low training difficulty to a high training difficulty according to the input result of the examinee and provided.

Thereafter, in the training data securing process, when the test subject's input result for the training data collection content is analyzed and the correct answer of the test subject reaches the correct answer reference value, the training data collection content for the test subject is stopped, It is possible to secure the training data from the input result of the subject for the training data collection content of the highest difficulty that has reached the correct answer reference value. In other words, it is possible to secure at least one selected from among training difficulty, training time, and a combination thereof corresponding to the highest difficulty of the training data collection content for which the examinee has reached the correct answer reference value as the training data. The correct reference value may be determined based on the number of consecutive correct input for the training data collection content that is repeatedly provided, the number of consecutive wrong answer inputs, and the correct answer rate for the repeatedly provided training data collection content, but is not limited thereto. .

In the training data conversion process 140, when the subject performs cognitive rehabilitation training through content other than the content for training data collection, the training data may be converted into conversion training data required by the other content.

The training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed for input of the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data collection content may include at least one selected from the number of objects required for input of the correct answer and combinations thereof. The training time may include an execution time of the training data collection content.

Through the training data conversion process 140, the allowable input time may be converted into at least one selected from a correct answer input time allowed for correct input of the other content, a correct answer input waiting time, and a combination thereof. The object movement speed may be directly converted to the movement speed of the object required for inputting the correct answer of the other content or may be set to 0 if the object necessary for inputting the correct answer of the other content does not exist. The number of necessary objects may be converted into the number of objects to be selected when the correct answer of the other content is input. Through the training data conversion process, the training time may be converted into the execution time of the other content.

Hereinafter, the technology disclosed in the present specification will be described in more detail through specific examples. The content to be described below is an example, and it is clearly stated that the scope of rights of the technology disclosed in the present specification is not limited by the content described below.

There are many games for cognitive training used by normal people in the App Store, but these products are not designed for the disabled, so it is difficult to use them in clinics. Recently, there are cognitive training tools developed to be used in clinics by convergence of new IT technologies. should be tested with a separate test tool, and the result should be determined through the experience of the therapist or rehabilitation therapist in the analysis process using various methods. In order to improve this, this technology automatically measures the training difficulty and time data required to provide the content (eg, game) for cognitive rehabilitation training optimized for the disabled, and the system determines the content and cognition for cognitive rehabilitation training from the analysis result A level suitable for the disabled is recommended in performing the contents for rehabilitation training. Through this, this technology proposes a technique for setting a training baseline as training data for cognitive rehabilitation training contents, in which the system automatically determines the process that the existing rehabilitation or therapist directly judges through data analysis.

To this end, in this technology, data related to the training difficulty that can be used for cognitive rehabilitation training and data for determining an appropriate training time are defined, and the process and details thereof are presented to obtain the optimal value for each disabled user. have.

From the training difficulty data obtained through this process, it is possible to obtain the training baseline data necessary to implement the cognitive rehabilitation training contents. Incorrect training evaluation caused by this can be prevented.

Current cognitive rehabilitation training uses a training tool and a method in which the subject performs training in a prescribed manner with a therapist or rehabilitator for a set period of time, and these methods are based on the training time and training difficulty depending on the experience and knowledge of the therapist or rehabilitator. It was a way of determining factors. However, this method has a problem in that factors such as training time and training difficulty vary depending on the competency and experience of the therapist or rehabilitation therapist, and as the training tool changes, it is difficult to determine the personalized training method that reflects the characteristics of the training tool. .

Cognitive training products for therapeutic purposes that incorporate IT technology, which have been recently developed Wrong setting of the training baseline reduces the training effectiveness of the disabled or causes the disabled to stop training. In this technology, in order to solve the problems of the cognitive rehabilitation training baseline setting method based on the personal experiences and repetitive tasks of the therapist or rehabilitation therapist, the level and ability of the disabled through accurate procedure progress and automated data measurement through the system We present technology that can effectively implement appropriate cognitive rehabilitation training contents.

In FIG. 2 , a mobile game for cognitive training is represented as an example as content for cognitive rehabilitation training. In addition, FIG. 2 shows a process of providing a training baseline in the present technology as training data of a person with a disability who is a subject to be tested, which is the basis of cognitive rehabilitation training through the contents for cognitive rehabilitation training. Personal information input, data collection game, cognitive domain selection, game execution, and game data generation of FIG. 2 correspond to an example of a content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training presented in the present technology.

In this technology, in training using contents for cognitive rehabilitation training (eg, games), in order to provide a more suitable level of training and services for each user who is a test subject, “contents for training data collection” for training data measurement have been developed and provided to users. It provides the appropriate level of training difficulty and time data required for training.

“Training difficulty” is a basic element for effective cognitive rehabilitation training, and since children and adults with cognitive impairment have lower concentration than the general public and have different levels for each individual, appropriate “training time” is also an important factor for effective training.

Therefore, in this technology, data related to training difficulty and training time required for effective cognitive rehabilitation training are defined. The defined training difficulty and training time are as follows.

Existing cognitive rehabilitation training contents are produced for the purpose of training only, so it is difficult to measure training data. So, in this technology, in order to collect training data of contents for cognitive rehabilitation training, contents for training data collection were developed so that necessary training data could be collected in a short time.

Training data collection contents can be classified according to the following criteria.

The reason for classifying the contents for training data collection in this way is that if the contents for cognitive rehabilitation training and the contents for training data collection are different from each other, it is difficult to accurately obtain the training data required for training, so it is necessary to supplement this. In addition, the reason for classifying the measurement method standards is that the basic measurement method is to measure the level of difficulty gradually from a low level to a high level. This is because it can take a long time, so it has the advantage of reducing the training data collection time by performing the reverse method.

3 shows a method of determining the content for training data collection for determining the training baseline, which is the training data of the content for cognitive rehabilitation training.

Among the data for setting the training baseline, which is the training data defined above, the training difficulty attribute is the data that determines the difficulty of the content, such as the time allowed for input of content for cognitive rehabilitation training suitable for the level of the user who is the subject, and the number of objects that require correct input. . The training difficulty is an important factor to increase the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation training and the subject's training participation, and the wrong training difficulty may cause frustration or stop the training participation in the subject with cognitive impairment.

In order for users with cognitive disabilities to continuously participate in training, it is necessary to determine an appropriate training time for each individual, but the existing technology allocates the same amount of time for each training content to all disabled people. However, unlike normal people, the amount of time that people with disabilities can focus on training is different for each individual, so it should be applied differently.

To this end, in the present technology, the training effect can be increased by making the overall training time constant and allocating different training times for each level of the examinee to each detailed training content.

On the other hand, the most important factor in the training time is to confirm that the user concentrates on the training, and if the user's attention falls, the training effect is rapidly reduced, so the training should be stopped.

The method of collecting training difficulty data corresponds to content type 01 and type 02 defined in the above measurement method standards. decide one of them

4 shows the process of collecting training data properties according to the measurement method by changing the content type 01, which is the content type 01, from the low difficulty level to the high difficulty level defined in the above measurement method standard. 4 shows a case in which the number of consecutive incorrect answers is used as the reference value for correct answers described above. 4 shows two as the number of consecutive incorrect input as an example, but is not limited thereto. 4, a game for collecting training data is exemplified as the content for collecting training data, but is not limited thereto.

Content type 01 of the measurement method reference of FIG. 4 corresponds to most users with cognitive impairment, and is a second type of data measurement method in which the cognitive level is far from the normal level. In this case, data is collected at the point in time when wrong answers are continuously selected while changing from easy difficulty to gradually higher difficulty. Entering an incorrect answer twice in a row may be judged as incapable of solving this level of problem.

The stored training difficulty is determined as the training baseline, which is the training data, based on the training difficulty data at the point in time when the correct answer is input, which is the stage immediately preceding the stage in which the incorrect answer is entered two or more times. The training difficulty data may include an input allowed time, an object movement speed, and the number of objects as described above.

The stored training time may be, for example, the total time that the subject performed the content. Specifically, when starting the content in FIG. 4, the training time is initialized to “0”, and when the training difficulty data collection condition is satisfied while increasing the training difficulty, the entire time performed until then is stored in “training time” . This is based on the fact that it is possible to focus attention when the correct answer is input, and it can be judged that it is difficult to concentrate due to the high training difficulty if the wrong answer is continuously input.

The training baseline, which is the training data, may include an input allowable time, an object movement speed, and the training time together with the number of objects.

5 is a first type of data measurement method in which the cognitive level is close to that of a normal person. It shows the process of collecting training data properties according to the measurement method by changing from high difficulty to low difficulty, which is content type 02 defined in the above measurement method criteria. 5 shows a case in which the number of consecutive correct answers is used as the correct answer reference value described above. In FIG. 5 , two times as the number of consecutive correct answer input are presented as an example, but the present invention is not limited thereto. FIG. 5 exemplifies a training data collection game as the training data collection content, but is not limited thereto.

Since normal or near-normal subjects may be easy to perform content created for subjects with cognitive impairment, content type 02 based on the measurement method of FIG. Data is collected at the point of continuously entering correct answers while changing The point in time when the correct answer is entered two or more times in a row means that this level of content has an appropriate level of difficulty for the target.

The stored training difficulty is determined as the training baseline, which is the training data, based on the training difficulty data at the point in time when the correct answer is entered two or more times. The training difficulty data may include an input allowed time, an object movement speed, and the number of objects as described above.

Since the subject of content type 02 defined in the measurement method standard is a person with a disability that is relatively close to normal people, it is more suitable to apply a fixed training time because of good concentration, but if necessary, use the method described in content type 01 defined in the measurement method standard Training time can be measured. Specifically, the stored training time may be the total time the subject performed the content. That is, when starting the content in FIG. 5 , the training time is initialized to “0”, and when the training difficulty data collection condition is satisfied while the training difficulty is lowered, the entire time performed until then is stored in the “training time”.

The training baseline, which is the training data, may include an input allowable time, an object movement speed, and the training time together with the number of objects.

The training baseline, which is the training data including the training difficulty and training time, collected through the above-described training data collection contents, is a starting point for cognitive rehabilitation training. As training is conducted at this starting point, the effectiveness can be measured and evaluated. Therefore, the training baseline is an important factor in determining the training effect through the contents for cognitive rehabilitation training, and if training is continued, this training baseline is changed according to the training result.

When the same content as the content for cognitive rehabilitation training is used as the content for training data collection as in the case of Type 10 defined as the content standard above, the data included in the training baseline, which is the training data, is “input allowed time” because the same content is used. , “Number of objects”, “Object movement speed” and “Training time” can be directly used in the difficulty setting of individual settings for cognitive rehabilitation training contents. Even for the same content, if the variable related to the difficulty is integrated into a “level”, the “level” corresponding to the difficulty is selected in the user settings. In addition, in the case of content for which the training time cannot be separately set, the training may be stopped when the rehabilitator or the therapist reaches the training time.

As in the case of type 20 defined as the content standard above, when content for cognitive rehabilitation training and other content are used as training data collection content, if the content for training data collection and the actual training content for cognitive rehabilitation are different, the defined difficulty data Find the most similar data to and enter it. The training time is entered directly in the training game, or training stops when the rehab or therapist reaches the training time.

The data properties similar to the data properties of the training data defined in Type 20 defined by the content standard may be as follows.

On the other hand, the training difficulty attribute of the training baseline may include three types of data: “input allowed time”, “object movement speed”, and “number of objects”. Depending on the characteristics of each cognitive rehabilitation training content, all of these training difficulty attributes may be applicable, or only some of them may be applicable.

6 shows a case in which “input allowed time” and “number of objects” are applied as training difficulty attributes. The contents of FIG. 6 are memory training to find the number of animals that have disappeared. “Input allowed time” corresponds to “limit time” in the contents, and “the number of objects” corresponds to “the number of animals that have disappeared” in the contents.

7 shows a case in which “input allowed time” and “object movement speed” are applied as training difficulty attributes. The content of FIG. 7 is a visual perception training to find a car, such as a car, from the content. “Input allowed time” corresponds to “running time” and “object movement speed” corresponds to “moving speed” of the vehicle on the road.

8 shows a case in which training difficulty attributes are integrated into stages and applied. In fact, in the content for cognitive rehabilitation training, training difficulty or training time is often used as the level of difficulty (number or beginner, intermediate, advanced, etc.). In this case, the step closest to the collected training baseline should be selected. The contents of FIG. 8 are contents divided in difficulty from level 1 to level 20, with level 1 having the lowest level of difficulty and level 20 being a high level having a normal level of difficulty. The above example is an example for understanding, and the number of steps of the content may be determined differently.

As described above, the technology disclosed in this specification can set training data that is a training baseline optimized for content for cognitive rehabilitation training for each subject for effective cognitive rehabilitation training of the subject through the content for cognitive rehabilitation training. It can provide the effect of preventing unnecessary time wasted by repeating the training process for the purpose of setting the training baseline of the subject or the wrong training evaluation caused by the wrong baseline.

From the above, various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described for purposes of illustration, and it will be understood that various modifications are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. And the various embodiments disclosed above are not intended to limit the spirit of the present disclosure, the true spirit and scope will be presented from the following claims.

100: Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training
110: Subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process
120: Content preparation process for training data collection
130: training data collection process
140: training data conversion process

Claims (7)

a subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process of acquiring the subject's cognitive impairment information from the subject's information;
a training data collection content preparation process for preparing training data collection content for the test subject's training data collection in response to the cognitive impairment information of the subject; and
The training data of the subject is collected through at least one adjustment selected from among training difficulty, training time, number of repeated provision, and a combination thereof, in the process of performing the contents for collecting training data of the subject. Including the training data collection process to
The training data includes at least one selected from the training difficulty, the training time, and a combination thereof,
When the subject performs cognitive rehabilitation training through content other than the content for training data collection, the method further comprises a training data conversion process of converting the training data into conversion training data required by the other content,
The content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training in which the subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process, the training data collection content preparation process, the training data collection process, and the training data conversion process are performed through a system. According to claim 1,
The training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed for input of the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data collection content Including at least one selected from the number of objects required for input of the correct answer and combinations thereof,
The training time is a content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training including the execution time of the training data collection content. According to claim 1,
The subject cognitive impairment information acquisition process includes a subject cognitive impairment level determination process for determining the subject's cognitive impairment level based on a normal person from at least one selected from the subject's gender, birth year, disability grade, and combinations thereof Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training. 4. The method of claim 3,
The content preparation process for the training data collection is
a cognitive training target determination process of determining a cognitive training target in response to the cognitive impairment level of the subject; and
Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training, including a content preparation process for judging the cognitive training level to prepare the content for judging the cognitive training level corresponding to the determined cognitive training target. 5. The method of claim 4,
The training data collection process is
a process of classifying the cognitive level of the subject into a first type close to a normal person level and a second type located far from the normal person level based on a reference value;
When the cognitive level of the test subject is the first type, the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is started from high difficulty, and the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level is gradually increased according to the input result of the inspected or, when the cognitive level of the subject is the second type, starting the training difficulty of the content for judging the cognitive training level from a low difficulty level, according to the input result of the subject, the content for judging the cognitive training level. a content difficulty adjustment process for collecting training data that gradually increases the training difficulty; and
Training data securing process for stopping the provision of the training data collection content to the test subject and securing the training data from the input result of the test subject when the correct answer of the subject for the training data collection content reaches a correct answer reference value Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training comprising a. delete According to claim 1,
The training difficulty is an input allowable time that is the maximum time allowed for input of the correct answer of the training data collection content, the object movement speed that is the movement speed of an object required for the correct answer input of the training data collection content, and the training data collection content Including at least one selected from the number of objects required for input of the correct answer and combinations thereof,
The training time includes the execution time of the training data collection content,
Through the training data conversion process, the allowable input time is converted to at least one selected from a correct answer input time allowed for correct input of the other content, a correct answer input waiting time, and a combination thereof, and the object movement speed is the other content It is switched to the moving speed of the object required for the correct answer input of It is converted to the number of objects to be
Content training data setting method for cognitive rehabilitation training in which the training time is converted into the execution time of the other content through the training data conversion process.

Images